Badger Movement Ecology in Colorado Agricultural Areas After a Fire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Badger Movement Ecology in Colorado Agricultural Areas After a Fire University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Proceedings for 2005 Badger Movement Ecology in Colorado Agricultural Areas After a Fire Craig Ramey USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA Jean Bourassa USDA/APHIS/WS, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_wdmconfproc Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Ramey, Craig and Bourassa, Jean, "Badger Movement Ecology in Colorado Agricultural Areas After a Fire" (2005). Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Proceedings. 124. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_wdmconfproc/124 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Proceedings by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. BADGER MOVEMENT ECOLOGY IN COLORADO AGRICULTURAL AREAS AFTER A FIRE CRAIG A. RAMEY, USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA. JEAN B. BOURASSA, USDA/APHIS/WS, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA Abstract: While investigating the American badger (Taxidea taxus) in eastern Colorado’s wheatlands, we studied 3 badgers which were affected by a 2.1 km2 man-made fire and compared them to 2 adjacent badgers unaffected by the fire. All badgers were equipped with radio-telemetry collars and generally located day and night for approximately 1 month pre-fire and 3 weeks post-fire. Three point triangulation locations were converted into a global information system database. Adaptive kernel analyses compared pre- and post-fire horizontal: home ranges (i.e. 95% utilization areas, UAs), core activity areas (50% UAs), movements, den and habitat use patterns. Mean (¯x) locations pre-fire (43.7) and post-fire (32.0) provided home ranges for affected badgers that averaged 8.3 km2 and 9.2 km2, respectively. While 2 badgers maintained one core area which was outside the burn, the third used 2 core activity areas, one remained the same after the fire and second changed. Diurnal to nocturnal movements (measured in 24 hrs cycles) were pre-fire ¯x = 1.2 km and post-fire ¯x = 1.3 km. Den use remained approximately 5, but some locations changed after the fire. Mean home ranges included 74% winter wheat or wheat stubble. Habitat use for all 5 badgers averaged: 81.4% wheat, 8% riparian, 7.2% sagebrush, and 3.4% burned. Unaffected badgers averaged 7.7 km2 home ranges, 1 core area, 1.0 km diurnal-nocturnal movements, 4 dens, and 93% wheat crops and 7% riparian habitats. After the fire burned 10% of badger 4's home range, 1 of 3 core areas, and 3 of 5 dens, it moved > 3km northwest into another tributary and established 1 new den. However, it frequently revisited the northern portion of its home range and associated core area. After approximately1 month, it consolidated this UA into a new core area 1.7 km northwest and maintained 1 of 3 pre-fire core areas. The fire consumed 6% of Badger 2 home range, and post-fire it moved into the unoccupied southern portion of badger 4’s pre-fire home range. It also moved slowly west into sagebrush probably in partial response to the tilling of approximately 1/3 of its home range which was completed on April 16. Only 1.0% of Badger 1’s home range and its core area were not affected by the fire. However, it slowly moved its home range southeast approximately 1.0 km into the unoccupied area assumed to have been the home range of an un-collared badger found dead in early April. Its core area moved approximately 0.5 km southwest. In summary the movement ecology of affected badgers illustrated three themes: (1) home ranges and core areas moved initially away from the fire, (2) then adjustments were made by each badger in response to other badgers, the burned area, and habitat requirements, and (3) finally a new equilibrium of home ranges was established among these badgers post fire including the use of the burned areas after a few weeks. Key words: badger, fire, movements, radio-telemetry, Taxidea taxus, utilization areas, wheat Proceedings of the 11th Wildlife Damage Management Conference. (D.L. Nolte, K.A. Fagerstone, Eds). 2005 337 INTRODUCTION Killingley 1983); therefore, such activities can Very little data has been published damage rangeland pastures (USDA 1990). about the movement ecology of the North Badgers may also negatively impact farm America badger (Taxidea taxus), a fossorial equipment and water systems (Minta and member of the weasel family. This medium Marsh 1988), because they may cause an sized carnivore is stocky and shaggy in increased need for maintenance. These appearance, and its activities are mainly sporadic negative interactions with humans nocturnal. Its head is shaped as a stout cone make the badger economically a minor that facilitates digging (Long and Killingley vertebrate pest to agricultural interests, but 1983). It has an extensive history in the they may cause serious losses to individual prairie grasslands associated with their prey farmers or ranchers (Minta and Marsh 1988). species (Messick 1987). Although badgers Even though badgers in agricultural primarily consume prairie dogs (Cynomys habitats have not been the focus of North spp.) (Clark 1977), they are also opportunistic American research, in Europe the Eurasian predators that eat deer mice (Peromyscus badger (Meles meles) has been involved in maniculatus), ground squirrels (Spermophilus many studies in cultivated landscapes, spp.), pocket gophers (Thomomys spp. and particularly control measures (Kowalczyk et Geomys spp.), and voles (Microtus spp.) al. 2003, Fischer 2003, Rosalino and Santos- (Fagerstone and Ramey 1995). Reis 2004). For example, badger damage to Because they are primarily nocturnal, field crops such as maize (Zea mais) has been badger studies have been greatly facilitated by studied in southwestern England with crop the use of radio–telemetry. One such study depredations decreasing after using an electric was done by Sargeant and Warner (1964), and fence for exclusion purposes (Poole et al. it described the extensive movements of a 2002). In contrast, Eurasian badger removal single badger. Later, Lindzey (1971) studied in agricultural areas have had mixed results as 7 badgers in pre-dominantly non-crop a control measure. Initially, their spatial sagebrush in Utah and Idaho. More recent organization was severely perturbed during studies have viewed their population trends in the first year; however, re-colonization relation to other prairie pothole carnivores occurred rapidly mainly by females thereafter (Greenwood and Sovada 1998) or studied (Tuyttens et al. 2000). In China, the constant their risk to dieldrin at the Rocky Mountain harvest of the hog badger (Arctonyx collaris) Arsenal National Wildlife Refuge in Colorado has decreased their numbers to very low (Henriques 1997, Hoff 1998). One conclusion levels (Wang 1999) which are maintained from these and other studies is that little is year after year. known about the badgers of the Great Plains Natural fires from summer lightening especially in agriculture areas. storms on the Great Plains have long posed a Badgers are considered occasional danger to prairie residents both human and pests in North American agricultural habitats animal. More recently, man-made fires set for (Minta and Marsh 1988). Their interactions weed control have become a part of the prairie with humans, occur because their fossorial environment. Some rangeland fire niche creates mounds from either digging investigators in the central Great Plains have deep burrows for dens or seeking rodent prey shown fire suppression whether natural or (Lindzey 1971, 1982). These activities man-made resulted in increased growth of sometimes have been hazardous to livestock herbaceous plants and woody vegetation. that step into them and may fracture a leg (Kaufman and Fleharty 1974, Kaufman et al. (Burt and Grossenheider 1964, Long and 1988) Some investigators have speculated 338 that as a result of fire there may have been occurred and were due to leg fractures caused increased habitat for badger prey and/or by stepping in badger’s holes in pastures. In possible their transitory movements. In addition, a recent development at the study summary, the effect of fire whether natural or site had been the conversion of some of the man-made on badger movement ecology has prairies from livestock grazing to dry-land not been previously studied in agricultural farming particularly for alfalfa or winter habitats of the North American Great Plains. wheat. During harvest, the machinery is in The Wildlife Services (WS) program need of frequent repair because they hit many of the U.S. Department of Agriculture earthen mounds and burrows that they strike (USDA), Animal and Plant Health Inspection that result from badger activities such as den Service (APHIS) has identified the badger as excavation and foraging. For over 50 years one of 17 species that it needs to control in private trappers and more recently WS certain instances as an agricultural pest personnel have intermittently controlled (USDA 1990). A two-ingredient gas cartridge badgers in this area, but they remained a (sodium nitrate and charcoal) producing high problem. concentrations of carbon monoxide gas when The study site was along both sides of burned has been suggested by Savarie et al. Badger Creek (T 4 S, R 58 W, Sec. 1, 2) (1980) to be an effective pyrotechnic fumigant which flows from south to north at for vertebrate pests that live in burrows or approximately 1,600 m above sea level. The dens. This predacide while undergoing re- area was comprised mainly of gentle hills and registration with the EPA, was shown to be an with some shallow canyons, sandy loam soil ineffective tool to control problem badgers (Nunn Association), and semi-arid conditions.
Recommended publications
  • The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores
    The 2008 IUCN red listings of the world’s small carnivores Jan SCHIPPER¹*, Michael HOFFMANN¹, J. W. DUCKWORTH² and James CONROY³ Abstract The global conservation status of all the world’s mammals was assessed for the 2008 IUCN Red List. Of the 165 species of small carni- vores recognised during the process, two are Extinct (EX), one is Critically Endangered (CR), ten are Endangered (EN), 22 Vulnerable (VU), ten Near Threatened (NT), 15 Data Deficient (DD) and 105 Least Concern. Thus, 22% of the species for which a category was assigned other than DD were assessed as threatened (i.e. CR, EN or VU), as against 25% for mammals as a whole. Among otters, seven (58%) of the 12 species for which a category was assigned were identified as threatened. This reflects their attachment to rivers and other waterbodies, and heavy trade-driven hunting. The IUCN Red List species accounts are living documents to be updated annually, and further information to refine listings is welcome. Keywords: conservation status, Critically Endangered, Data Deficient, Endangered, Extinct, global threat listing, Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable Introduction dae (skunks and stink-badgers; 12), Mustelidae (weasels, martens, otters, badgers and allies; 59), Nandiniidae (African Palm-civet The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most authorita- Nandinia binotata; one), Prionodontidae ([Asian] linsangs; two), tive resource currently available on the conservation status of the Procyonidae (raccoons, coatis and allies; 14), and Viverridae (civ- world’s biodiversity. In recent years, the overall number of spe- ets, including oyans [= ‘African linsangs’]; 33). The data reported cies included on the IUCN Red List has grown rapidly, largely as on herein are freely and publicly available via the 2008 IUCN Red a result of ongoing global assessment initiatives that have helped List website (www.iucnredlist.org/mammals).
    [Show full text]
  • Records of Small Carnivores from Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park, Southern Sumatra, Indonesia
    Records of small carnivores from Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park, southern Sumatra, Indonesia Jennifer L. MCCARTHY1 and Todd K. FULLER2 Abstract Sumatra is home to numerous small carnivore species, yet there is little information on their status and ecology. A camera- trapping (1,636 camera-trap-nights) and live-trapping (1,265 trap nights) study of small cats (Felidae) in Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park recorded six small carnivore species: Masked Palm Civet Paguma larvata, Banded Civet Hemigalus derbyanus, Sumatran Hog Badger Arctonyx hoevenii, Yellow-throated Marten Martes flavigula, Banded Linsang Prionodon linsang and Sunda Stink-badger Mydaus javanensis effort, photo encounters for several of these species were few, despite their IUCN Red List status as Least Concern. This supports the need for current and comprehensive. An unidentified studies to otter assess (Lutrinae) the status was of also these recorded. species onEven Sumatra. given the relatively low camera-trap Keywords: Arctonyx hoevenii, camera-trapping, Hemigalus derbyanus, Martes flavigula, Mydaus javanensis, Paguma larvata, Pri- onodon linsang Catatan karnivora kecil dari Taman Nasional Bukit Barisan Selatan, Sumatera, Indonesia Abstrak Sumatera merupakan rumah bagi berbagai spesies karnivora berukuran kecil, namun informasi mengenai status dan ekologi spesies-spesies ini masih sedikit. Suatu studi mengenai kucing berukuran kecil (Felidae) menggunakan kamera penjebak dan perangkap hidup di Taman Nasional Bukit Barisan Selatan (1626 hari rekam) mencatat enam spesies karnivora kecil, yaitu: musang galing Paguma larvata, musang tekalong Hemigalus derbyanus, pulusan Arctonyx hoevenii, musang leher kuning Martes flavigula, linsang Prionodon linsang, dan sigung Mydaus javanensis. Tercatat juga satu spesies berang-berang yang tidak teriden- status mereka sebagai Least Concern.
    [Show full text]
  • How Is the COVID-19 Outbreak Affecting Wildlife Around the World?
    Open Journal of Ecology, 2020, 10, 497-517 https://www.scirp.org/journal/oje ISSN Online: 2162-1993 ISSN Print: 2162-1985 How Is the COVID-19 Outbreak Affecting Wildlife around the World? Abdel Fattah N. Abd Rabou Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza Strip, Palestine How to cite this paper: Abd Rabou, A.N. Abstract (2020) How Is the COVID-19 Outbreak Affecting Wildlife around the World? Open The COVID-19 is the infectious disease caused by the most recently discov- Journal of Ecology, 10, 497-517. ered coronavirus at an animal market in Wuhan, China. Many wildlife spe- https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2020.108032 cies have been suggested as possible intermediate sources for the transmission Received: June 2, 2020 of COVID-19 virus from bats to humans. The quick transmission of COVID-19 Accepted: August 1, 2020 outbreak has imposed quarantine measures across the world, and as a result, Published: August 4, 2020 most of the world’s towns and cities fell silent under lockdowns. The current Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and study comes to investigate the ways by which the COVID-19 outbreak affects Scientific Research Publishing Inc. wildlife globally. Hundreds of internet sites and scientific reports have been This work is licensed under the Creative reviewed to satisfy the needs of the study. Stories of seeing wild animals Commons Attribution International roaming the quiet, deserted streets and cities during the COVID-19 outbreak License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ have been posted in the media and social media.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence and Conservation Status of Small Carnivores in Two Protected Areas in Arunachal Pradesh, North-East India
    Occurrence and conservation status of small carnivores in two protected areas in Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India Aparajita DATTA, Rohit NANIWADEKAR and M. O. ANAND Abstract The rainforests of north-east India harbour a diverse assemblage of mustelids, viverrids and herpestids, many of which are hunted. Yet, very little information exists on their ecology, distribution, abundance, and conservation status. A camera-trapping survey was carried out in two protected areas (Namdapha National Park and Pakke Wildlife Sanctuary) in Arunachal Pradesh between 2005 and 2007 as part of a wildlife monitoring programme. The two areas are believed to hold 13–15 species of forest-dwelling small carnivores, apart from three otter species. We recorded seven species in 2,240 trap-nights in Namdapha, and four species in 231 trap-nights in Pakke. Direct sightings and indirect evidence confirmed the occurrence of additional small carnivore species apart from those recorded during the camera-trap surveys in both areas. Photo-capture rates of four species recorded were high in Namdapha relative to those in three sites in South-east Asia. Capture rates of the Large Indian Civet Viverra zibetha were relatively high in Namdapha compared with other species, and this species, along with the Yellow-throated Marten Martes flavigula, appears to be common. Species such as the Binturong Arctictis binturong, Spotted Linsang Prionodon pardicolor and Stripe-backed Weasel Mustela strigidorsa were not recorded by camera- traps, although other evidences of their presence were recorded. Incidental or retaliatory hunting was recorded for most species; otters are highly threatened in Namdapha due to considerable hunting for skins which have high market value.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting the Demise of Tiger and Leopard, and the Status of Other Carnivores and Prey, in Lao PDR's Most Prized Protected Area: Nam Et - Phou Louey
    Global Ecology and Conservation 20 (2019) e00766 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Ecology and Conservation journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/gecco Original Research Article Documenting the demise of tiger and leopard, and the status of other carnivores and prey, in Lao PDR's most prized protected area: Nam Et - Phou Louey * Akchousanh Rasphone a, , Marc Kery b, Jan F. Kamler a, David W. Macdonald a a Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, OX13 5QL, UK b Swiss Ornithological Institute, Seerose 1, CH-6204, Sempach, Switzerland article info abstract Article history: The Nam Et - Phou Louey National Protected Area (NEPL) is known for its diverse com- Received 15 April 2019 munity of carnivores, and a decade ago was identified as an important source site for tiger Received in revised form 24 August 2019 conservation in Southeast Asia. However, there are reasons for concern that the status of Accepted 24 August 2019 this high priority diverse community has deteriorated, making the need for updated in- formation urgent. This study assesses the current diversity of mammals and birds in NEPL, Keywords: based on camera trap surveys from 2013 to 2017, facilitating an assessment of protected Clouded leopard area management to date. We implemented a dynamic multispecies occupancy model fit Dhole Dynamic multispecies occupancy model in a Bayesian framework to reveal community and species occupancy and diversity. We Laos detected 43 different mammal and bird species, but failed to detect leopard Panthera Nam Et - Phou Louey National Protected pardus and only detected two individual tigers Panthera tigris, both in 2013, suggesting that Area both large felids are now extirpated from NEPL, and presumably also more widely Tiger throughout Lao PDR.
    [Show full text]
  • China October
    China October - December 2019 40 days Sophie and Manuel Baumgartner China was the last part of our 5-month mammal watching journey. We already had a great time in Borneo and South America and even though we were not sure how it would be here - we already appreciated a lot what nature had ready for us. What we experienced in China blew us away! When we started to organise our trip to China our idea was to travel independently once again and put a focus on also discovering new places (contributing in style of citizen science) but we quickly realized that this was going to be complicated here. It started with the fact that we were not allowed to drive, neither with our driving license, nor with the international one. Once we were there, we were really grateful to have a Chinese speaking travel companion, we barely met anyone speaking English and since one cannot use Google (no Facebook, Wikipedia and WhatsApp only partially as well by the way) here… well. No Google Translate and only Bing which leads to translations such as this on the picture besides. Even if you are travel experienced, everything seems to be different here in China and discovering new places was a great challenge to us. There are no Apps or anything like that where nature reserve and accommodations are visible, most interesting roads (small roads) are not visible on Google Maps (maps.me was sometimes more accurate). So, we always basically had to drive [email protected] anywhere and discover there. Accommodations were sometimes hard to find and there is also the possibility that you do find an accommodation but that they don’t take “westerners” because they don’t know how to report to the police or one time the police kindly told us to leave the whole county as we would have needed a special permit to visit.
    [Show full text]
  • Know Your Wild Animals
    CareCare forfor thethe WildWild IndiaIndia PresentsPresents KnowKnow YourYour WildWild AnimalsAnimals Look,Look, somesome animalanimal inin thethe bushbush Identify-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --???????????? CanCan youyou ???? IdentifyIdentify allall otherother WildWild AnimalsAnimals IfIfIf YesYesYes------Keep------Keep itit upup IfIfIf NoNoNo PleasePlease HaveHave aa looklook Let'sLet'sLet's beginbeginbegin thisthisthis lessonlessonlesson fromfromfrom WildWildWild MammalsMammalsMammals ofofof IndiaIndiaIndia WildWild MammalsMammals ofof IndiaIndia WhatWhat isis aa MammalMammal ?? DistinctiveDistinctive characterscharacters ÄÄMammaryMammary GlandsGlands oror MilkMilk producingproducing glands.glands. ÄÄ AnimalAnimal withwith hairshairs (except(except marinemarine mammals:mammals: WhalesWhales andand Dolphins)Dolphins) ÄÄSkeletonSkeleton oror bonybony frameworkframework onon thethe body.body. ÄÄNails,Nails, clawsclaws andand teeth.teeth. WildWild MammalsMammals ofof IndiaIndia WhatWhat isis aa MammalMammal ?? DistinctiveDistinctive characterscharacters ÄÄ LowerLower JawJaw directlydirectly hingedhinged toto skull.skull. ÄÄ HeartHeart andand lungslungs areare separatedseparated fromfrom intestineintestine byby muscularmuscularmuscular partition.partition. ÄÄ DoDo notnot produceproduce eggs,eggs, givegive birthbirth toto youngyoung onesones (except(except MonotremesMonotremes && Marsupians).Marsupians). CarnivoresCarnivoresCarnivores MostMost charismatic,charismatic, powerful,powerful, magnificentmagnificent andand beautifulbeautiful
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Minimum Trapping Effort on Camera Traps
    How long is enough to detect terrestrial animals? Estimating the minimum trapping eVort on camera traps Xingfeng Si1, Roland Kays2 and Ping Ding1 1 The Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology for Endangered Wildlife of the Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China 2 North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences & NC State University, Raleigh, NC, USA ABSTRACT Camera traps is an important wildlife inventory tool for estimating species diversity at a site. Knowing what minimum trapping eVort is needed to detect target species is also important to designing eYcient studies, considering both the number of camera locations, and survey length. Here, we take advantage of a two-year camera trapping dataset from a small (24-ha) study plot in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve, eastern China to estimate the minimum trapping eVort actually needed to sample the wildlife community. We also evaluated the relative value of adding new camera sites or running cameras for a longer period at one site. The full dataset includes 1727 independent photographs captured during 13,824 camera days, documenting 10 resident terrestrial species of birds and mammals. Our rarefaction analysis shows that a minimum of 931 camera days would be needed to detect the resident species suYciently in the plot, and c. 8700 camera days to detect all 10 resident species. In terms of detecting a diversity of species, the optimal sampling period for one camera site was c. 40, or long enough to record about 20 independent photographs. Our analysis of evaluating the increasing number of additional camera sites shows that rotating cameras to new sites would be more eYcient for measuring species richness than leaving cameras at fewer sites for a longer period.
    [Show full text]
  • And Red Panda (Ailuridae)
    MIXED-SPECIES EXHIBITS WITH CARNIVORANS VII. Mixed-species exhibits with Raccoons (Procyonidae) and Red Panda (Ailuridae) Written by KRISZTIÁN SVÁBIK Assistant Curator, Budapest Zoo and Botanical Garden, Hungary Email: [email protected] 30th January 2019 Refreshed: 7th June 2020 Cover photo © GaiaZOO Mixed-species exhibits with Raccoons (Procyonidae) and Red Panda (Ailuridae) 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF SPECIES COMBINATIONS – PROCYONIDAE ............................................. 4 Northern Raccoon, Procyon lotor .......................................................................... 5 Crab-eating Raccoon, Procyon cancrivorus .......................................................... 6 South American Coati, Nasua nasua .......................................................................7 White-nosed Coati, Nasua narica .......................................................................... 8 Kinkajou, Potos flavus ............................................................................................ 9 Ringtail, Bassariscus astutus .................................................................................10 LIST OF SPECIES COMBINATIONS – AILURIDAE .................................................. 11 Red Panda, Ailurus fulgens ................................................................................... 12 LIST OF MIXED-SPECIES EXHIBITS WITH LOCATIONS – PROCYONIDAE ........ 13 Northern
    [Show full text]
  • Mixed-Species Exhibits with Civets and Genets (Viverridae)
    MIXED-SPECIES EXHIBITS WITH CARNIVORANS IV. Mixed-species exhibits with Civets and Genets (Viverridae) Written by KRISZTIÁN SVÁBIK Assistant Curator, Budapest Zoo and Botanical Garden, Hungary Email: [email protected] 28th June 2018 Refreshed: 25th May 2020 Cover photo © Espace Zoologique de Saint-Martin-la-Plaine Mixed-species exhibits with Civets and Genets (Viverridae) 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 3 Viverrids with viverrids ........................................................................................... 4 LIST OF SPECIES COMBINATIONS – VIVERRIDAE.................................................. 5 Binturong, Arctictis binturong ............................................................................... 6 Small-toothed Palm Civet, Arctogalidia trivirgata ................................................7 Common Palm Civet, Paradoxurus hermaphroditus ............................................ 8 Masked Palm Civet, Paguma larvata .................................................................... 9 Owston’s Palm Civet, Chrotogale owstoni ............................................................10 Malayan Civet, Viverra tangalunga ...................................................................... 11 Common Genet, Genetta genetta .......................................................................... 12 Cape Genet, Genetta tigrina .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Camera-Trap Records of Small Carnivores from Eastern Cambodia, 1999–2013
    Camera-trap records of small carnivores from eastern Cambodia, 1999–2013 T. N. E. GRAY1, PIN C.2, PHAN C.2, R. CROUTHERS2, J. F. KAMLER3 and PRUM S.2,4 Abstract Camera-trapping targeted at large mammals was conducted across nine lowland areas (predominantly under 300 m asl) in eastern Cambodia between 1999 and 2013. At least 10 small carnivore species were recorded including, based on The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, two categorised as Vulnerable (Large-spotted Civet Viverra megaspila and Binturong Arctictis bintu- rong) and two as Near Threatened (Large Indian Civet V. zibetha and Hog Badger Arctonyx collaris). Over 75% of small carnivore camera-trap encounters were of Large Indian Civet or Common Palm Civet Paradoxurus hermaphroditus, indicating that these species remain widespread and common in eastern Cambodia’s lowland forests. Possible declines of Hog Badger, Large-spotted Civet and Small Indian Civet Viverricula indica are noted but further research is merited. This is particularly important for Large- Keywordsspotted Civet,: Arctonyx given collaristhe likely, Hog high Badger, significance lowland of forest, this region Large to Indian its global Civet, conservation Large-spotted status. Civet, Mondulkiri, Phnom Prich, Viver- ra megaspila, Viverra zibetha ζមេរ➶習័យវ 叒រវ㿒តកិ 㿒叒់ ានូវ叒រមេទេ羶ំ 習㿒ថ្នវ ា ក䞶់ រមៅកុាង㿒រំ ន ់ 徶គ޶ងមក㿒ើ 叒រមទ習កេុᾶព ពᯒី ា ១ំ ៩៩៩ ដល់ ᯒា ២ំ ០១៣ ζរ⮶កζ់ មេរ➶ ថ㿒ររូ 習័យវ 叒រវ㿒ិតដដល習ំមៅមៅមលើពពួកថនិក習㿒វដដល掶ន掶ឌធំដដល厶នមធើវម ើងកុងា រ玶ងᯒា ំ ១៩៩៩-២០១៣ មៅទូ䞶ំង ៩㿒ំរន់ទំ侶រកណ្តតល (徶គម叒រើន掶នរយៈកំព習់ម叒ζេ ៣០០េ ߒព習់ᾶង នីវទូ
    [Show full text]
  • Small Carnivore Conservation
    SMALL CARNIVORE CONSERVATION The Newsletter and Journal of the IUCN/SSC Mustelid, Viverrid & Procyonid Specialist Group Number 23 October 2000 Short-tailed mongoose (Herpestes brachyurus) - Photo: H. Van Rompaey The production and distribution of this issue has been sponsored by “Columbus Zoo”, Powell, Ohio, USA “Central Park Zoo”, New York, NY, USA “Marwell Preservation Trust Ltd”, Colden Common, UK “Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp”, Antwerp, Belgium and the “Carnivore Conservation & Research Trust”, Knoxville, TN, USA 23 SMALL CARNIVORE CONSERVATION The Newsletter and Journal of the IUCN/SSC Mustelid, Viverrid & Procyonid Specialist Group Editor-in-chief: Harry Van Rompaey, Edegem, Belgium Associate editor: Huw Griffiths, Hull, United Kingdom Editorial board: Angela Glatston, Rotterdam, Netherlands Michael Riffel, Heidelberg, Germany Arnd Schreiber, Heidelberg, Germany Roland Wirth, München, Germany The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the IUCN, nor the IUCN/SSC Mustelid, Viverrid & Procyonid Specialist Group. • The aim of this publication is to offer the members of the IUCN/SSC MV&PSG, and those who are concerned with mustelids, viverrids, and procyonids, brief papers, news items, abstracts, and titles of recent literature. All readers are invited to send material to: Small Carnivore Conservation c/o Dr. H. Van Rompaey Jan Verbertlei, 15 2650 Edegem - Belgium [email protected] [email protected] Printed on recycled paper ISSN 1019-5041 24 Trophic characteristics in social groups of the Mountain coati, Nasuella olivacea (Carnivora: Procyonidae) A. RODRÍGUEZ- BOLAÑOS, A. CADENA and P. SÁNCHEZ This study identifies the dietary composition of the Moun- kind of adaptation in order to exploit some kind of particular tain coati Nasuella olivacea (Gray, 1865).
    [Show full text]