NOTICE of NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CONVENED MEETING of the SHAREHOLDERS of IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Day Tuesday Date March

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NOTICE of NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CONVENED MEETING of the SHAREHOLDERS of IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Day Tuesday Date March 1 IBM India Private Limited No.12, Subramanya Arcade Bannerghatta Main Road Bangalore - 560029, India www.ibm.com/in NOTICE OF NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CONVENED MEETING OF THE SHAREHOLDERS OF IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Day Tuesday Date March 16, 2021 Time 11:00 AM IST to 11:30 AM IST Place Hilton Bangalore Embassy Golflinks, Embassy Golf Links Business Park, Off Intermediate Ring Road, Bengaluru – 560071 Sr. Contents Page No No. 1 Notice of the National Company Law Tribunal convened meeting of the shareholders of IBM India Private Limited under the 2-4 provisions of Sections 230 – 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 2 Explanatory statement under Section 230(3) and 232(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 6 of the Companies 5-17 (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 3 Annexure 1: Scheme of Arrangement between IBM India Private Limited and Grand Ocean Managed Infrastructure Services Private 18-45 Limited 4 Annexure 2: Share Entitlement Report dated January 13, 2021 issued by D and P India Advisory Services LLP 46-60 5 Annexure 3: Report adopted by the Board of Directors of IBM India Private Limited pursuant to the provisions of Section 61-63 232(2)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 6 Annexure 4: Supplementary unaudited accounting statement of IBM India Private Limited for the six months period ended on 64-94 September 30, 2020 7 Proxy Form 95-96 8 Attendance Slip 97 9 Route map for the venue of the meeting 98 Registered Office: No. 12, Subramanya Arcade, Bannerghatta Main Road, Bangalore – 560029 CIN: U72200KA1997PTC022382 2 BEFORE THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL BENGALURU BENCH COMPANY APPLICATION (CAA) NO. 05/BB/2021 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION UNDER SECTIONS 230 TO 232 AND OTHER APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND IN THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND GRAND OCEAN MANAGED INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SHAREHOLDERS AND CREDITORS IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, a company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office at No. 12, Subramanya Arcade, Bannerghatta Main Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560029 …..Demerged Company/Applicant No. 1 AND GRAND OCEAN MANAGED INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, a company incorporated under Companies Act, 2013 and having its registered office at No. 12, Subramanya Arcade, Bannerghatta Main Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560029 …..Resulting Company/Applicant No. 2 NOTICE CONVENING THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CONVENED MEETING OF THE SHAREHOLDERS OF IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Notice is hereby given that by an order dated January 28, 2021, the Bengaluru Bench of the Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”, and such order, the “Order”) has directed IBM India Private Limited (“Applicant No. 1” or “Demerged Company”) to convene the meeting of shareholders of the Demerged Company, for the purpose of considering, and if thought fit, approving with or without modification, the Scheme of Arrangement proposed to be made between the Demerged Company and the Resulting Company and its respective shareholders and creditors, pursuant to the provisions of Sections 230 - 232 and other applicable provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 (the “Scheme”). In pursuance of the said Order and as directed therein, further notice is hereby given that the meeting of the shareholders of Applicant No. 1 will be held at Hilton Bangalore Embassy Golflinks, Embassy Golf Links Business Park, Off Intermediate Ring Road, Bengaluru - 560071 on Tuesday, March 16, 2021 from 11:00 AM IST to 11:30 AM IST(“Meeting”) at which place, date and time, the shareholders are requested to attend and, if thought fit, approve with or without modification(s) the following resolutions: “RESOLVED THAT pursuant to the provisions of Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) and other applicable provisions of the Act (including any statutory modifications or re- enactment thereof, for the time being in force), the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 and any other rules, circulars and notifications made under the Act as may be applicable, and enabling provisions in the Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association of IBM India Private Limited (“Company”) and subject to the approval of the requisite majority of creditors of the Company and as directed by National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”), Bench at Bengaluru, Karnataka constituted under the provisions of the Act and such other competent authority, as may be applicable or any other appropriate authority under the applicable provisions of 4 Meeting provided that a certified true copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors or other governing body of the body corporate authorizing such representative to attend and vote at the Meeting is deposited at the registered office of Applicant No. 1 not later than 48 hours before the scheduled time of the commencement of the Meeting of the shareholders of Applicant No. 1. 2. A shareholder entitled to attend and vote at the Meeting is entitled to appoint a proxy to attend and vote and such proxy need not be a shareholder of Applicant No. 1. The proxy form duly completed should, however, be deposited at the registered office of Applicant No. 1 not later than 48 hours before the scheduled time of the commencement of the Meeting of Applicant No. 1. 3. The authorized representative or proxy are requested to carry a copy of valid proof of identity (i.e., a PAN Card / Aadhaar Card / Passport / Driving License / Voter ID Card) at the Meeting. 4. All alterations made in the proxy form should be initialled. 5. The quorum of the Meeting of the shareholders of Applicant No. 1 shall be both shareholders of Applicant No. 1. 6. Shareholder or its proxy or authorized representative is requested to bring copy of this notice to the Meeting and produce the attendance slip duly completed and signed at the entrance of the Meeting venue. 7. Only such shareholders of Applicant No. 1 may attend and vote (either in person or by proxy or through authorised representatives) at the Meeting, whose name appear in the Chartered Accountant’s certificate certifying the list of shareholders of Applicant No. 1 as on December 31, 2020 as had been filed with the NCLT. A person/entity who is not a shareholder on such date should treat this notice for information purposes only and shall not be entitled to avail the facility of voting at the venue of the Meeting. 8. Voting rights shall be reckoned on the paid-up value of the shares registered in the names of equity shareholders of Applicant No. 1 as on December 31, 2020. 9. Mr. Sudheendra.P.Ghali (FCS) has been appointed by NCLT, as the Scrutinizer to scrutinize the votes received. 10. The Scrutinizer will submit his report to the Chairperson of the Meeting after scrutinizing the votes logged by the shareholders. The result of the voting on the resolution at the Meeting shall be announced by the Chairperson of the Meeting or any person authorized by him, within two weeks from the date of conclusion of the Meeting. 11. Relevant documents referred to in the notice and the explanatory statement are open for inspection by shareholders at the registered office of Applicant No. 1 on all working days, except Saturdays and Sundays, between 11:00 AM IST and 1:00 PM IST upto the date of the Meeting and at the Meeting during the meeting hours. Enclosures: As above 5 BEFORE THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL BENGALURU BENCH COMPANY APPLICATION (CAA) NO. 05/BB/2021 IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION UNDER SECTIONS 230 TO 232 AND OTHER APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND IN THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND GRAND OCEAN MANAGED INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SHAREHOLDERS AND CREDITORS IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, a company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office at No. 12, Subramanya Arcade, Bannerghatta Main Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560029 …..Demerged Company/Applicant No. 1 AND GRAND OCEAN MANAGED INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, a company incorporated under Companies Act, 2013 and having its registered office at No. 12, Subramanya Arcade, Bannerghatta Main Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560029 …..Resulting Company/Applicant No. 2 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT UNDER SECTIONS 230(3) AND 232(2) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 6 OF COMPANIES (COMPROMISE ARRANGEMENT AND AMALGAMATION) RULES, 2016 (“ARRANGEMENT RULES”) 1. Pursuant to the Order dated January 28, 2021, passed by the Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench (“NCLT”), a meeting of the shareholders of IBM India Private Limited (“Applicant No. 1”/ “Demerged Company”) is being convened at Hilton Bangalore Embassy Golflinks, Embassy Golf Links Business Park, Off Intermediate Ring Road, Bengaluru - 560071 on Tuesday, March 16, 2021 from 11:00 AM IST to 11:30 AM IST (“Meeting”), for the purpose of considering and if thought fit, approving the arrangement embodied in the Scheme of Arrangement between the Demerged Company, Resulting Company and their respective shareholders and creditors (“Scheme”) for demerger of the Demerged Undertaking (as defined in Scheme) of Demerged Company into Resulting Company. A copy of the Scheme is enclosed as Annexure 1. Notice of the Meeting together with the copy of the Scheme is sent herewith. This statement explaining the terms of the Scheme of Arrangement is being furnished, inter alia, as required u/s 230(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. 2. DETAILS AS PER RULE 6(3) OF THE ARRANGEMENT RULES 2.1 Venue, Time and Date of Meeting The National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench vide its Order dated January 28, 2021 in CA (CAA) No.
Recommended publications
  • Corporate Citizenship in India Transforming Business, Technology and Society
    IBM Corporate Citizenship Corporate Citizenship in India Transforming business, technology and society IBM’s longstanding, global commitment to corporate responsibility is a “At IBM, we leverage our demonstration of our values and the priorities that guide them. By thought leadership, integrating corporate responsibility with business strategy, we contrib- ute to the communities in which we do business while engaging our technologies and expertise clients, partners and employees. IBM’s technology and talent have the to help our clients and our power to help transform governments, institutions, communities and communities – making a the quality of life for people around the world. Whether it’s improving difference to where we live education, revitalizing cities, protecting the environment or driving and work. Our CSR focus economic growth, IBM and IBMers contribute innovative solutions to the world’s toughest societal challenges. in 2014 was on supporting the community Education through service grants, IBM’s Teachers TryScience (TTS) is a science portal and resources, helping build the capacity strategies and tutorial for science educators across the globe to spark students’ interest in science, technology, engineering and math of NGOs that we are (STEM). Through Teachers TryScience, teachers can improve their associated with to make a instruction of project-based learning, with a focus on engineering and larger or deeper impact. design. Teachers are encouraged to search for grade-specific lessons We continue to evolve our that are linked to online professional development that helps them approach on corporate further implement lessons in the classroom. The TTS Community of Practice or the online teachers community allows to share the best citizenship to provide the practices and experiences across each country.
    [Show full text]
  • IBM India Private Limited: Update on Material Event
    October 20, 2020 IBM India Private Limited: Update on Material Event Summary of rating action Instrument* Rated Amount (Rs. crore) Rating outstanding [ICRA]AAA (Stable) / [ICRA]A1+; Long-term/Short-term – Proposed facilities 150.00 outstanding Short-term - Non-fund Based 20.00 [ICRA]A1+; outstanding Long-term (Interchangeable) (20.00) [ICRA]AAA (Stable); outstanding Total 170.00 Material Event On October 8, 2020, International Business Machines Corporation, USA (IBM Corporation; rated A2/stable/P1 by Moody’s) has announced its decision to spin off its managed infrastructure services unit of global technology services (GTS) division into a separate public company by the end of 2021, subject to regulatory approvals. The spin-off is to sharpen its focus on high-margin open hybrid cloud platform and artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. Subsequently, on October 10, 2020, based on media articles, it is noted that the Indian operations, which are currently carried on under IBM India Private Limited (IBM India), would be restructured as well and around one-fourth of its employees will be part of the new entity catering to the needs of managed IT infrastructure services. Impact of the Material Event IBM India is one of the key global delivery centres for IBM Corporation with over 70% of its revenues being derived from export of services to the parent entity and its fellow subsidiaries, as part of the outsourcing business model. The company derives over 20% of its revenues from technology services, cloud platform and global business services division, wherein IBM India provides infrastructure services and technology support services to its clients.
    [Show full text]
  • IBM India Private Limited: Ratings of [ICRA]AAA (Stable)/ [ICRA]A1+ Assigned
    September 23, 2020 IBM India Private Limited: Ratings of [ICRA]AAA (Stable)/ [ICRA]A1+ assigned Summary of rating action Current Rated Amount Instrument* Rating Action (Rs. crore) Long-term/Short-term – Proposed facilities 150.00 [ICRA]AAA (Stable) / [ICRA]A1+; assigned Short-term - Non-Fund based 20.00 [ICRA]A1+; assigned Long-term (Interchangeable) (20.00) [ICRA]AAA (Stable); assigned Total 170.00 Rationale The assigned ratings favourably factor in the strong parentage of IBM India Private Limited (IBM India), being a step- down subsidiary of International Business Machines Corporation, USA (IBM Corporation; rated A2/stable/P1 by Moody’s), experienced management team, strong operational and strategic linkages with IBM Corporation, and its healthy financial and operational profile with presence across various end-user industries. Being part of IBM Corporation, a global leader in providing information technology (IT)-related services and products, IBM India has access to the strong expertise and capabilities in the business of the latter. India is a key market for IBM Corporation, although its share in the overall revenues is less (<5%) because of the demographic advantage of availability of low-cost labour and large, skilled talent pool. The company is one of the key global delivery centres at the Group level and derived over 70% of its revenues in FY2020 from export of services to its parent and fellow subsidiaries on a cost- plus model. IBM India’s credit profile is characterised by its large scale of operations, stable earnings and cashflows, net debt-free status and strong liquidity profile. The Covid-19 pandemic has adversely impacted the Indian and global IT services industry, causing disruption to both supply (restriction of movement of employees) and demand (like delayed offtake of new projects, reduced discretionary spend and IT budget cuts).
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit: a Unique Irish Opportunity for Cross-Border Restructuring? 14.02.2019
    briefing Brexit: a Unique Irish Opportunity for Cross-Border Restructuring? 14.02.2019 Certainty is a key element in any business planning. For corporate restructuring practitioners who are planning or working on cross border transactions, the uncertainty relating to Brexit and the departure of the United Kingdom from the European Union (“EU”) may have long-term significant consequences and a “no-deal” Brexit (without a withdrawal agreement and the certainty of a transition period) will have immediate and significant consequences for any such cross-border transaction. In this context, Irish law and the Irish Courts can provide practical and effective solutions to assist corporates (and their advisors) restructure their business and affairs in a straight-forward and easily understood manner. It is also an opportunity for the Irish legal system to demonstrate its value to international practitioners. This opportunity was also recognised in a recent proposal document to the Irish Government produced by the Law Society of Ireland and the Bar Council of Ireland entitled “Promoting Ireland as a leading centre globally for international legal services” (the “Report”). In the context of the UK’s exit from the EU, the Report states that “we foresee a meaningful role for Irish law in certain areas and industry sectors allied with the provision of a greater range of legal services in Ireland for the benefit of international and Irish business. In a number of sectors, we believe that Ireland as a location and the Irish law and the Irish Courts are and can be advantageous contractual choices for international clients (now or in the future)”.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Examinership: Post-Eircom a Look at Ireland's Fastest and Largest
    A look at Ireland’s fastest and largest restructuring through examinership and the implications for the process Irish examinership: post-eircom A look at Ireland’s fastest and largest restructuring through examinership and the implications for the process* David Baxter Tanya Sheridan A&L Goodbody, Dublin A&L Goodbody [email protected] The Irish telecommunications company eircom recently successfully concluded its restructuring through the Irish examinership process. This examinership is both the largest in terms of the overall quantum of debt that was restructured and also the largest successful restructuring through examinership in Ireland to date. The speed with which the restructuring of this strategically important company was concluded was due in large part to the degree of pre-negotiation between the company and its lenders before the process commenced. The eircom examinership demonstrated the degree to which an element of pre-negotiation can compliment the process. The advantages of the process, having been highlighted through the eircom examinership, might attract distressed companies from other EU jurisdictions to undertake a COMI shift to Ireland in order to avail of this process. he eircom examinership was notable for both the Irish High Court just 54 days after the companies Tsize of this debt restructuring and the speed in entered examinership. which the process was successfully concluded. In all, This restructuring also demonstrates the advantages €1.4bn of a total debt of approximately €4bn was of examinership as a ‘one-stop shop’: a flexible process written off the balance sheets of the eircom operating that allows for both the write-off of debt and the change companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore's New “Supercharged” Scheme of Arrangement
    KEY POINTS Feature Singapore’s new regime combines elements of the US Ch 11 process with the traditional creditor scheme of arrangement. Companies may apply for a broad moratorium that can apply to acts outside of Singapore. Moratoriums can also be granted in respect of certain related companies. There is a (cross-class) cram down mechanic in respect of unsecured debt, but its effectiveness in practice is uncertain. The changes include introduction of a “pre-packaged scheme” which bypasses the requirement for scheme meetings, where it can be demonstrated the outcome is a foregone conclusion. It remains to be seen the extent to which foreign courts will recognise and give effect to a Singapore scheme. Authors Paul Apáthy and Emmanuel Chua Singapore’s new “supercharged” scheme of arrangement In this article, the authors consider aspects of Singapore’s new “supercharged” these new provisions are based on concepts scheme of arrangement procedure and its potential use in cross border restructurings. found in Ch 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. By adopting these concepts, Singapore is seeking to create a new regime that incorporates INTRODUCTION Central to the reforms is the the “best of both worlds” of the scheme of SINGAPORE’S NEW“SUPERCHARGED” SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT Singapore is seeking to become an augmentation of the scheme of arrangement arrangement and Ch 11 procedures. ■international debt restructuring hub, process with a number of new provisions, akin to London or New York. This aspiration some of which were adopted from the United APPLICABILITY OF SINGAPORE is unambiguously conveyed in the title of the States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy SCHEMES TO FOREIGN COMPANIES ‘Report of the Committee to Strengthen Code).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 1-2360 (Commission file number) INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) NEW YORK 13-0871985 (State of Incorporation) (IRS Employer Identification Number) ARMONK, NEW YORK 10504 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 914-499-1900 (Registrant’s telephone number) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Voting shares outstanding Name of each exchange Title of each class at February 9, 2018 on which registered Capital stock, par value $.20 per share 921,167,894 New York Stock Exchange Chicago Stock Exchange 1.375% Notes due 2019 New York Stock Exchange 2.750% Notes due 2020 New York Stock Exchange 1.875% Notes due 2020 New York Stock Exchange 0.500% Notes due 2021 New York Stock Exchange 2.625% Notes due 2022 New York Stock Exchange 1.25% Notes due 2023 New York Stock Exchange 1.125% Notes due 2024 New York Stock Exchange 2.875% Notes due 2025 New York Stock Exchange 0.950% Notes due 2025 New York Stock Exchange 0.300% Notes due 2026 New York Stock Exchange 1.750% Notes due 2028 New York Stock Exchange 1.500% Notes due 2029 New York Stock Exchange 8.375% Debentures due 2019 New York Stock Exchange 7.00% Debentures due 2025 New York Stock Exchange 6.22% Debentures due 2027 New York Stock Exchange 6.50% Debentures due 2028 New York Stock Exchange 7.00% Debentures due 2045 New York Stock Exchange 7.125% Debentures due 2096 New York Stock Exchange Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scheme of Arrangement: a Viable Option for Nigerian Companies In
    EMERGING MARKETS RESTRUCTURING JOURNAL ISSUE NO. 1 — SPRING 2016 The Scheme of Arrangement: A Viable Option for Nigerian Companies in a Downturn? By DIPO OKURIBIDO In Nigeria, large corporate bankruptcies are a rarity, and available literature on the subject tends to deal more with theory and provisions of existing law than with actual precedents and examples of lenders seeking liquidation, or to otherwise enforce security. Reasons abound for this situation, but perhaps the most striking of these is the fact that existing corporate insolvency legislation generally focuses on the actual liquidation of the insolvent company, as opposed to establishing buffers or moratoriums to create opportunities for its turnaround or rescue. The result of the limited insolvency regime is that Nigerian law establish a process for a Nigerian company to enter into a companies simply do not surrender to bankruptcy proceedings compromise or arrangement with its creditors or shareholders until there is clearly and absolutely no hope of survival. Up to (or any class of either of them). that point, in the gap between limping and dying, the tool of choice has been the Scheme of Arrangement. Under the rules contained in the Principal Companies Legislation1 (and supplemented in recent iterations of the The Nigerian Scheme of Arrangement Securities and Exchange Commission Rules and Regulations2), a public company would need to file an application for the The Nigerian Scheme of Arrangement is loosely based on the proposed scheme with the Nigerian Securities and Exchange UK Scheme of Arrangement. Similarly with its source material, Commission (“SEC”) and, following the SEC’s approval of the the Scheme of Arrangement provisions under Nigerian scheme, would then need to make an application to the Federal 26 EMERGING MARKETS RESTRUCTURING JOURNAL ISSUE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Schemes of Arrangement As Restructuring Tools
    Schemes of Arrangement as Restructuring Tools Since the start of the current credit crunch there has been a huge increase in the use of schemes as a restructuring tool. In most cases a scheme will be the fall-back strategy for use in cases where consensual changes to creditors’ and/ or shareholders’ rights under finance documents cannot be negotiated. Often the need for a scheme will fall away, but the prospect of a scheme will have helped deliver the consensus. So as well as those schemes that see their way through to implementation, there are many draft schemes in the marketplace. The purpose of this client note is to provide an overview of the use of schemes as a creditor restructuring tool and to highlight some of the key practice points. 1 What is a scheme? constituencies. The dominant driver of the creditor negotiations will usually be the A scheme of arrangement is a very flexible and creditor(s) who hold security and/or enjoy a long-established Companies Act procedure priority in repayment on an enforcement at the which can be used to vary the rights of some or point at which the value of the business breaks all of a company’s creditors and/or shareholders. (known as the fulcrum). That said, the question As long as a scheme receives the support of the of the value of a business will invariably be a statutory majorities of each class of creditor contentious point between the various stake- and/or shareholder whose rights are affected by holders in a restructuring and the value of the it, and the court sanctions it, the scheme will be business is in any event likely to move during binding on all creditors and/or shareholders, the course of restructuring negotiations as the including those within each class voting against business continues its operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Schemes of Arrangement
    Schemes of arrangement a special supplement to www.runoffbusiness.com PricewaterhouseCoopers PricewaterhouseCoopers (www.pwc.com) is the world’s largest professional services organisation. Drawing on the knowledge and skills of more than 125,000 people in 142 countries, we build relationships by providing services based on quality and integrity. The following areas of the firm have contributed to this supplement: Solutions for Discontinued Actuarial & Insurance Insurance Business Management Solutions PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Solutions for Discontinued PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Actuarial & Insurance Insurance Business team comprises 140 insurance Management Solutions (AIMS) practice is a global experts dedicated to dealing with issues facing practice of more than 450 consultants, providing life and discontinued insurance business. The team has an non-life actuarial and insurance advisory services. With a extensive range of specialists with expertise in proven track record across five continents and practices restructuring. in 14 countries, AIMS offers the global presence, resources and expertise to meet its clients’ most critical They include qualified chartered insurance practitioners, needs. Our actuaries regularly provide advice to both the accountants, restructuring practitioners and specialists insurance industry and broader financial services in risk management, treasury and business providers. management. As part of the world’s largest professional services firm, This team has a broad range of experience, including AIMS can also call on the global expertise of auditors, board level strategic management, claims run-off tax advisers, corporate finance and discontinued management, collections, underwriting, risk insurance business specialists who specialise in the management, investigations and finance. insurance sector. The team can also draw on the strength of offices Our non-life practice is the UK’s largest practice of its around the world including dedicated staff in the US and kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Schemes of Arrangement As Restructuring Tools
    Schemes of Arrangement as Restructuring Tools Since the start of the current credit crunch there has been a huge increase in the use of schemes as a restructuring tool. In most cases a scheme will be the fall-back strategy for use in cases where consensual changes to creditors’ and/ or shareholders’ rights under finance documents cannot be negotiated. Often the need for a scheme will fall away, but the prospect of a scheme will have helped deliver the consensus. So as well as those schemes that see their way through to implementation, there are many draft schemes in the marketplace. The purpose of this client note is to provide an overview of the use of schemes as a creditor restructuring tool and to highlight some of the key practice points. Timeline Over time, the English courts have become increasingly willing to accept companies’ innovative arguments regarding the establishment of a “sufficient connection” with England for the purposes of a Scheme. German company English governing English governing English governing Dutch company law and exclusive German governing law and exclusive law and exclusive jurisdiction New York governing law, amended to jurisdiction jurisdiction law and non- English law No UK lenders and Mostly UK lenders Mostly UK lenders exclusive jurisdiction no other connection No COMI shift to the UK establishments Some UK customers with England COMI shift to the UK UK 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 1 What is a scheme? 2 Who can use a scheme? A scheme of arrangement is a very flexible and Schemes need to be implemented in accordance long-established Companies Act procedure with the Companies Act 2006 and involve two court applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Rahul Cliffard Saluja
    Rahul Cliffard Saluja Rahul is an experienced HR professional with specialization in Leadership and Management Development based in Pune. Rahul Cliffard Saluja brings with him 24 ye a rs of experience having wo rke d in the Hospitality and Te ch no lo g y sectors. Starting off in Sales and Marketing, he moved to Learning in 1998. Ever since he has facilitated all flavours of programmes, including Strategy Workshops, Cu ltu re Building Programmes, Organisation, Culture & Leadership Performance Man ag e men t Workshops, Personal and Professional Effectiveness Development Consultant Workshops and Inductions. He is just as co mfo rtab le with Large Group Facilitation as he is with classroom sessions. His facilitation jou rne y includes Human Resource Professional facilitating sessions of popular programmes - Six Thinking Ha ts and Seven Ha b its Pune, Maharashtra of Highly Effective People. He has also picked up certifications on various Psychometric Too ls - MBTI, DiSC, HBDI and Kenexa Personality & Leadership Assessment. Leadership & Management Rahul's streng th s are exhibited in the co mfo rt with which he facilitates Development programmes around Leadership and Management Development, Cultural Diversity, Diversity and Inclusion in the wo rkp la ce , Ne w Man ag e r Orientation, Performance Management Personal and Professional Effectiveness. Talent Management Rahul’s experience from working on other segments of HR, namely, Ta le nt Acquisition, Performance Ma nag e men t , Employee Engagement, Building and Employee Engagement Reinforcing Cu lt u re , Policies and Procedures, Re wa rd s and Re co gn it io n and Retention enable him to consult with organisations for interventions across an Coaching, Mentoring and employees’ life-cycle.
    [Show full text]