United States National Museum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United States National Museum ADYERTISEMEKT. This work (Bulletin No. 48) is one of a series of papers inteuded to illustrate the collections l)elongiug- to the United States, and constitut- iug- the National Museum, of which the Smithsonian Institution was placed in charge by the act of Congress of August 10, 1840. The publications of the National Museum consist of two series—the Bulletins, of which this is No. 48, in continuous series, and the Proceed- ings, of which the seventeenth volume is now in press. A small edition of each paper in the Proceedings is distributed in pamphlet form to specialists in advance of the publication of the bound volume. The Bulletins of the National Museum, the publication of which was commenced in 1875, consist of elaborate papers based upon the collec- tions of the Museum, reports of expeditions, etc., while the Proceed- ings facilitate the prompt publication of freshly-acquired facts relating to biologj^, anthropology, and geology, descriptions of restricted groups of animals and plants, the discussion of particular questions relative to the synonymy of species, and the diaries of minor expeditions. Other papers, of more general popular interest, are printed in the Ap])endix to the Annual Eeport. Full lists of the i^ublications of the Museum may be found in the cur- rent catalogues of the publications of the Smithsonian Institution. Papers intended for publication in the Proceedings and Bulletins of the National Museum are referred to the Committee on Publications, composed as follows: F. W, Time (chairman), R. Edward Earll (editor), T. H. Bean, Otis T. Mason, Leonhard Stejneger, and Lester F. Ward. S. P. Langley, Secretary of the Sniithsonian Institution. Washington, D. C, October S, 1894. II CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARD A MONOGRAP OB" THE INSECTS OF THE lEPIDOPTEROUS FAMILY NOCTOH)! BOREAL NORTH AMERICA. A EEVISION OF THE DELTOID MOTHS. JOHX B. SMITH, Sc. D., Professor of Entomology in Eutgers College. WASHINGTON: GOVERNJIENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1895. o TABLE OF COoSTTEKTS. Page. Introductory remarks and definitions 1_3 Genera wrongly classed as Deltoids 3 4 Division into tribes '4 Antennal iieculiarities 4_g Sexual modification of male legs g_g Genera discussed q_, Ackno^^ledgments 10 Synopsis of tribes and genera J3 j^ Genus Epizeuxis l")--^? characters and scheme of division 15-17 analysis of the species i-j descriptions of the species 17-'^7 Genus Zanxlogxatha '>7-45 characters and scheme of division 27-31 analysis of the species 3^ 32 descriptions of the species 32-15 Genus Hokmisa 45-50 characters and scheme of division 45 46 analysis of the species 4g descriptions of the species 46-50 Genus Philometra _ 50-i54 chara cters of the genus and species 50 51 analysis of the species r^^ descriptions of the species 51-54 Genus Ciiytolita 54-57 characters of the genus and species 54 55 analysis of the species '. ' -~ descriptions of the species 55-57 Genus Bleptina * -- oi-blr-i characters of the ' genus and species 57 53 analysis of the species ' co descriptions of the species 58-61 Genus Tetanolita ()l-6" characters of the genus and species ^. 61 62 analysis ' of the species ^9 di'Scri])tions of the species 63-65 Genus Rexia fio-/6r- ^r characters and scheme of division 65-68 analysis of tlie species gg descriptions of the species : 68-76 Genus Hvpenula T-'S characters of the genus -j; -j-j description of the species : 77 78 V VI CONTENTS. Page. Genus Heterogramma 78-80 characters of the genus 78, 79 description of the species 79, 80 Genus Gabkrasa 80-82 characters of tlie genus 80, 81 description of the species 81, 82 Genus Dercetis 82-84 characters of fhe genus 82, 83 descriptions of the species 83, 84 Genus Palthis 84-88 characters of the genus and species 84-86 descriptions of the species 86-88 Genus Capis 88,89 characters of the genus 88 description of the species 88, 89 Genus Salia 89-91 characters of the genus 89, 90 analysis of the species 90 descriptions of the species 90, 91 Genus Bomolocha 91-109 characters and scheme of division 91-94 analysis of the species 94, 95 description of the species 95-109 Genus Lomanaltes 109, 110 characters of the genus 109 description of the species 109, 110 Genus Plathypena 110-112 characters of the geuus 110, 111 descriptions of the species 111-112 Genus Hypena 112-118 characters and scheme of division 112-114 analysis of the species 114 descriptions of the species 114-118 Synouymical list of genera and species 119, 120 Explanation of plates 121-126 General Index 127-129 CONTRIBUTIONS TOWARD A MONO(iRARH OF THK INSECTS OF THE LEPIDOP- TEROliS FAMILY NOCTUID.E OF BOREAL NORTH AMERICA. A REVISION OF THE DELTOID MOTHS. L5.V .loitx B. Smith, Sc. D., I'rofessor of Entomolo<jy in Iiuhjers CuUeye. Uiidoi- the general term " Deltoids'' there are usually grouped in lists, catalogues, and eollections the moths of a series of species and genera which have a somewhat distinctive appearance aud habitus, but for which we have as yet no exclusive characters. This series has been elevated to family raidc, has been associated with the Pyralids, and has been most recently recognized as indistinguish- able in structural characters from the IS octuidie. It is possible that sub- family rank at least shoiihl be accorded the series as here restricted; Init this is not proposed at present, since within the limits of the series there are two if not three very distinct types or tribes, of which Helia, Henninid, and Hi/pena are, respectively, typical. In a general way the si)ecies are characterized by unusually long palpi, which are either slender, closely scaled and curved upward and backward, sickle like, often far exceeding the head, or they are directed forward obliquely or straight, clothed with upright scales, the second joint longest, the third always set into the second so as to point upward. In the latter case the palpi with the pointed frontal tuft form a beak or snout similar to that in the Crambidie among the Pyralids. These elongated palpi are not peculiar to this family among the Noctuids; but there are very few genera so constructed in other series, and these may be, in most cases, diflerentiated without trouble. Among the species in which the palpi form a snout, being oblitjue or straight, with elongated second joint, none are Deltoids that have the terminal joint drooping or set in at a downward angle with the second joint. Nor do I include any species in which the second joint is closely scaled above, the long vestiture directed downward, so that the apparent enlarge- ment of the joint is formed by scales directed and extending below the joint. This at first seems a slight character; but it will assume impor- tance when the character of the palpi is closely studied, and when we consider that it is really reversing the i)Osition of a joint. Of the forms 78(51'— No. 48 1 2 BULLKTIX 48, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM. in wbicb the palpi are slender, curving np^yard and exceeding tlie head, none are Deltoids in which the two pairs of Avings are similar in size and niaculation or have a geometriform ornamentation extending on both wings. Further, with the exception of Helia, all Deltoids with palpi of the character last described have the lore legs of the male modified, clothed with tufts or pencils of hair, and always with aborted tibia. With the exceptions stated, the series does not differ from other Noctuids in any essential features; yet it will be worth whde to mention some of the other main characters. The liead is always small, yet never retracted, and often prominent. In none of our species is the tongue aborted or even weak, so all of them are capable of feeding. The eyes are usually prominent, semigiobose, though never very large; always naked, though in some genera— only one in our fauna—fringiul with hairy lashes. Ocelli are present in all our forms, situated close to the compound eye, but distinctly variable in their position relative to the posterior margin of the eye. In the Herminiini they are almost as far back as i)ossible, while in Hypenini they are almost in the middle of the crown. The \)o\ut of insertion of the antennse varies somewhat; but as in the matter of the ocelli our material is not yet sufficient to enable us to make studies on all the points involved or to generalize. The structure of the antennai is exceedingly interesting from the character of the sexual modifications; but this subject will betaken up again further on, and I need only say that they vary from simple to lengthily pectinated. The character of the i)alpi has been already referred to. The body is slight in most instances, never very robust. The thorax is closely scaled in general, tufted only in the Hypenini, where a lobust structure is characteristic of the males. The abdomen is usually cylindric, without sexual differences, but in the female terminating in an abrupt point, while in the male it is truncated. While it is never short, the abdomen rarely exceeds the anal angle of the secondaries more than a little, and it as rarely fails to reach that point. Tuftings are only found in the Hypenini, where, in most of the species, there is a series of little round, trunca'ted, dorsal tufts, composed of upright scales and very easily rubbed off. The legs are usually long and slender, though hardly weak. The thoracic structure tends to an elongation of the parts, the coxa^ being in all cases well develo])ed.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Appendix 3. Thousand Islands National Park Taxonomy Report
    Appendix 3. Thousand Islands National Park Taxonomy Report Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Agelenidae Agelenopsis Agelenopsis potteri Agelenopsis utahana Anyphaenidae Anyphaena Anyphaena celer Hibana Hibana gracilis Araneidae Araneus Araneus bicentenarius Larinioides Larinioides cornutus Larinioides patagiatus Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona abboti Clubiona bishopi Clubiona canadensis Clubiona kastoni Clubiona obesa Clubiona pygmaea Elaver Elaver excepta Corinnidae Castianeira Castianeira cingulata Phrurolithus Phrurolithus festivus Dictynidae Emblyna Emblyna cruciata Emblyna sublata Eutichuridae Strotarchus Strotarchus piscatorius Gnaphosidae Herpyllus Herpyllus ecclesiasticus Zelotes Zelotes hentzi Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus atriceps 1 Collinsia Collinsia plumosa Erigone Erigone atra Hypselistes Hypselistes florens Microlinyphia Microlinyphia mandibulata Neriene Neriene radiata Soulgas Soulgas corticarius Spirembolus Lycosidae Pardosa Pardosa milvina Pardosa moesta Piratula Piratula canadensis Mimetidae Mimetus Mimetus notius Philodromidae Philodromus Philodromus peninsulanus Philodromus rufus vibrans Philodromus validus Philodromus vulgaris Thanatus Thanatus striatus Phrurolithidae Phrurotimpus Phrurotimpus borealis Pisauridae Dolomedes Dolomedes tenebrosus Dolomedes triton Pisaurina Pisaurina mira Salticidae Eris Eris militaris Hentzia Hentzia mitrata Naphrys Naphrys pulex Pelegrina Pelegrina proterva Tetragnathidae Tetragnatha 2 Tetragnatha caudata Tetragnatha shoshone Tetragnatha straminea Tetragnatha viridis
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Tree Bats Foraging at Wind Turbines in the Southern Great Plains?
    ARE TREE BATS FORAGING AT WIND TURBINES IN THE SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS? By CECILY FRASER FOO Bachelor of Arts, 2011 Whitman College Walla Walla, WA Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the College of Science and Engineering Texas Christian University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science August 2016 This page is intentionally left blank ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study would not have been possible without the generous support of NextEra Energy Resources, including access to the wind facility at Wolf Ridge. I also need to thank my fantastic team of field technicians who helped with insect surveys: Cole Lindsey, Matt Paulsen, Alex Avrin, Carly Tolle, Martin McQueen, Karl Hoenecke, and Patrick Ryan. If anyone needs any bats dissected, Karl Hoenecke and Mallory Melton were a huge help in that department. Thanks is also due to the techs and former students in the TCU bat lab who conducted insect surveys and bat mortality monitoring in 2012 and 2013, especially Danielle Cochran and Chrissy Bienz. I also want to thank the TCU Biology Department for providing me with an Adkins Fellowship to conduct my research and a great community in which to work. All three of my committee members were essential to this project. Dr. Victoria Bennett taught me how to light trap and helped me organize my thoughts and writing. I learned every step of the genetic analysis portion of my research from Dr. Dean Williams. He patiently answered my (often redundant) questions in the lab and helped me troubleshoot. Dr. Amanda Hale provided constant guidance and encouragement; she helped me design my study, analyze my results, and patiently let me run ideas and concerns by her throughout the course of my project.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve
    SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 159 SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Doug Macaulay Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159 Project Partners: i ISBN 978-1-4601-3449-8 ISSN 1496-7146 Photo: Doug Macaulay of Pale Yellow Dune Moth ( Copablepharon grandis ) For copies of this report, visit our website at: http://www.aep.gov.ab.ca/fw/speciesatrisk/index.html This publication may be cited as: Macaulay, A. D. 2016. Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve. Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159. Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB. 31 pp. ii DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies of the Department or the Alberta Government. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometro
    Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, & Noctuoidea) Biodiversity Inventory of the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab Hugo L. Kons Jr. Last Update: June 2001 Abstract A systematic check list of 489 species of Lepidoptera collected in the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab is presented, including 464 species in the superfamilies Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, and Noctuoidea. Taxa recorded in Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, and Thyrididae are also included. Moth taxa were collected at ultraviolet lights, bait, introduced Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), and by netting specimens. A list of taxa recorded feeding on P. notatum is presented. Introduction The University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Laboratory (NATL) contains 40 acres of natural habitats maintained for scientific research, conservation, and teaching purposes. Habitat types present include hammock, upland pine, disturbed open field, cat tail marsh, and shallow pond. An active management plan has been developed for this area, including prescribed burning to restore the upland pine community and establishment of plots to study succession (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/natl.htm). The site is a popular collecting locality for student and scientific collections. The author has done extensive collecting and field work at NATL, and two previous reports have resulted from this work, including: a biodiversity inventory of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea) of NATL (Kons 1999), and an ecological study of Hermeuptychia hermes (F.) and Megisto cymela (Cram.) in NATL habitats (Kons 1998). Other workers have posted NATL check lists for Ichneumonidae, Sphecidae, Tettigoniidae, and Gryllidae (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/insect.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265509943 Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve Technical Report · January 2004 CITATIONS READS 2 349 1 author: Allan Douglas Macaulay Government of Alberta 29 PUBLICATIONS 44 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Holmes Crossing Ecological Reserve Lepidoptera View project Pakowki Sandhills Lepidoptera Survey View project All content following this page was uploaded by Allan Douglas Macaulay on 04 October 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve prepared by Doug Macaulay, P. Biol. (Alberta Lepidopterists’ Guild) January 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY..................................................................... 3 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 7 DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................... 7 Species List (March 21, 2016) ........................................................................................ 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................. 19 Appendix 1. Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve Species List………………… .. ….26 List of Figures Figure 1. Cucullia speyeri
    [Show full text]
  • Moose Lake Report 2006
    Collection of Lepidoptera at Moose Lake Provincial Park in 2006 C. Bruce Christensen, June 1, 2008 5702 43 A ST. Vegreville, AB, T9C 1E3 [email protected] Description of Moose Lake Provincial Park Moose Lake Provincial Park is located approximately 15 km SW of Bonnyville, Alberta, Canada in the northern boreal forest at coordinates 54.16, 110.54. The park consists of numerous inter-mixed habitats, including jack pine, paper birch, poplar, white spruce, black spruce bog, sand dune, flowering shrubs and other trees, and beach areas with forbs and sedge growth. Dead Man’s Point is a very densely forested area of Moose Lake Provincial Park. Cattails, forbs and sedges and shrubs lead up to the forested areas from the lake. Selection of Location and Sites Moose Lake is within 50 km of the Alberta-Saskatchewan border, which increases the probability of finding new species for Alberta. The park is reasonably level throughout with numerous well-groomed trails for easy access (all sites accessible by walking or road vehicle). This reduces the cost of accessing the sites. Each trap site was selected to maximize the diversity of habitats in an attempt to collect the largest variety of lepidopteran species. 2 Moose Lake Provincial Park is located west of Bonnyville in Alberta, Canada Collection Purpose The purpose of this study was to collect and identify a cross-section of the lepidopteran species indigenous to the Moose Lake area and to mount one or more specimens of each species for archival purposes in the Strickland Museum, University of Alberta. Collection Techniques Several collection techniques were used to obtain a more complete profile of the species of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta Bowman 1951
    AN ANNOTATED LIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF ALBERTA1.* Abstract This list consists of 1825 species and varieties of Lepidoptera which have been taken in Alberta. Of these, 657 are records of captures in the hitherto almost completely neglected Microlepidoptera. Though few specialists on this continent have studied the taxonomy of this large group, those who have done so in certain families have generously assisted in classifying the species which are recorded. Unfortunately, in a few families it has been ilnpossible to obtain this assistance. Despite the omissions this necessitates, the list constitutes the most comprehensive catalogue of Microlepidoptera which has, up to the present, been attempted for any province in the Donlinion. Arrangement and nomenclature are based on McDunnough's Check List of the Lepidoptera of Catzada alzd the United States, published in 1938 and 1939. Proposed modifications in nomenclature, presented in subsequent publications, are substituted if they appear to be gaining general acceptance. Locality records for captures are presented by a system of ecological areas of which the chief climatological and biological characteristics are briefly described. Introductory Professional entomologists are very greatly aided in the pursuit of their lifeworlc with its practical objectives by the unstinted and critical industry of competent amateurs. Such amateurs have gathered a vast mass of data upon the distribution and the relative abundance of various insects and have recorded valuable information on the biology of the groups to which they For personal use only. have devoted their particular attention. In no field of entbmological endeavor has this been more in evidence than it is in the study of Lepidoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Moths: Lepidoptera
    Moths: Lepidoptera Vítor O. Becker - Scott E. Miller THE FOLLOWING LIST summarizes identi- Agency, through grants from the Falconwood fications of the so-called Macrolepidoptera Corporation. and pyraloid families from Guana Island. Methods are detailed in Becker and Miller SPHINGIDAE (2002). Data and illustrations for Macrolepi- doptera are provided in Becker and Miller SPHINGINAE (2002). Data for Crambidae and Pyralidae will Agrius cingulatus (Fabricius 1775). United States be provided in Becker and Miller (in prepara- south to Argentina. tion). General, but outdated, background infor- Cocytius antaeus (Drury 1773). Southern United mation on Crambidae and Pyralidae are pro- States to Argentina. vided by Schaus (1940). Data for Pterophoridae Manduca sexta (Linnaeus 1763). Widespread in are provided in Gielis (1992) and Landry and the New World. Gielis (1992). Author and date of description Manduca rustica (Fabricius 1775). Widespread in are given for each species name. Earlier dates the New World. were not always printed on publications; those Manduca brontes (Drury 1773). Antilles north to in square brackets indicate that the year was Central Florida. determined from external sources not the pub- lication itself As in previous lists, authors' MACROGLOSSINAE names are put in parentheses when their Pseudosphinx tetrio (Linnaeus 1771). (See plate generic placement has been revised. Detailed 37.) United States through the Antilles to acknowledgments are provided in Becker and Argentina. Miller (2002), but, in addition, we are espe- Erinnyis alope (Drury 1773). Widespread in the cially grateful to C. Gielis, E.G. Munroe, M. New World. Shaffer, and M. A. Solis for assistance with iden- Erinnyis ello (Linnaeus 1758). Neotropical.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Cuban Lepidoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta)
    TERMS OF USE This pdf is provided by Magnolia Press for private/research use. Commercial sale or deposition in a public library or website is prohibited. Zootaxa 3384: 1–59 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A list of Cuban Lepidoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta) RAYNER NÚÑEZ AGUILA1,3 & ALEJANDRO BARRO CAÑAMERO2 1División de Colecciones Zoológicas y Sistemática, Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática, Carretera de Varona km 3. 5, Capdevila, Boyeros, Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba. CP 11900. Habana 19 2Facultad de Biología, Universidad de La Habana, 25 esq. J, Vedado, Plaza de La Revolución, La Habana, Cuba. 3Corresponding author. E-mail: rayner@ecologia. cu Table of contents Abstract . 1 Introduction . 1 Materials and methods. 2 Results and discussion . 2 List of the Lepidoptera of Cuba . 4 Notes . 48 Acknowledgments . 51 References . 51 Appendix . 56 Abstract A total of 1557 species belonging to 56 families of the order Lepidoptera is listed from Cuba, along with the source of each record. Additional literature references treating Cuban Lepidoptera are also provided. The list is based primarily on literature records, although some collections were examined: the Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática collection, Havana, Cuba; the Museo Felipe Poey collection, University of Havana; the Fernando de Zayas private collection, Havana; and the United States National Museum collection, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC. One family, Schreckensteinidae, and 113 species constitute new records to the Cuban fauna. The following nomenclatural changes are proposed: Paucivena hoffmanni (Koehler 1939) (Psychidae), new comb., and Gonodontodes chionosticta Hampson 1913 (Erebidae), syn.
    [Show full text]