Thailand After the Red Shirt Uprising

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Thailand After the Red Shirt Uprising Avoiding Conflict: Thailand after the Red Shirt Uprising Thailand’s 2006 coup unleashed deadly political conflict as a conservative elite rallied against Thaksin Shinawatra and his red shirt supporters. Further strife was predicted in the wake of Yingluck Shinawatra’s 2011 election victory. But, as Kevin Hewison reports, the expected clashes have not yet materialised. n April and May 2010, Thailand’s reducing opposition from the mili- challenge their own hierarchical con- colour-coded political conflicts tary, judiciary and monarchy. trol of the state. Igrabbed international attention While some in the red shirt Soon after Thaksin’s victory, these when the governing Democrat Party movement considered the election opponents began a campaign to oust led by Abhisit Vejjajiva ordered army a mandate for rapid and progressive him. The yellow-shirted People’s Al- crackdowns on pro-Thaksin Shina- change, for Thaksin, Yingluck and liance for Democracy (PAD) rallied watra red shirt protesters that were Pheu Thai leaders, compromise and and demonstrated, destabilising the demanding a new election. The reconciliation have been the defin- government. With Thaksin refusing result was more than 90 killed and ing political strategies since gaining to resign, the military was prodded some 2,400 injured. In murky cir- office. The underlying rationale for into action, prompted by former cumstances, several areas of Bang- all this has been a determination that generals in the king’s advisory kok and some provincial capitals the Yingluck administration should body, the Privy Council. When the were torched. Abhisit had presided remain in place for a full term and More than 90 military’s tanks rolled and the king over a remarkable expansion of po- gain re-election. people were quickly granted an audience to the litical repression, which, by the time In compromising with opponents, killed and junta afterwards, the military brass of the violence, saw virtually all red the Pheu Thai Party is seeking to probably felt satisfied that there was shirt media closed, tens of thousands prevent destabilising street dem- some 2,400 no bloodshed and that it had the of web pages blocked and an emer- onstrations and conservative elite injured in the support of Bangkok’s middle class, gency decree and the lèse majesté law, opposition that unseated previous 2010 protests including academics, civil society which protects the monarchy from pro-Thaksin administrations. Pheu organisations and the mainstream criticism, used to imprison more Thai has had to seek accommoda- media. than 200 political opponents. tions with a military leadership The royalist determination to Fast forward to late 2012 and associated with the 2006 coup, a destroy Thaksin was seen when the Thailand seems to have undergone judiciary that brought down several military appointed an interim gov- a transformation. The Democrats pro-Thaksin parties and a palace that ernment led by General Surayud are in opposition while Yingluck has been implacably opposed to Chulanont, who resigned from the Shinawatra and her Pheu Thai Thaksin since at least 2005. Privy Council to become prime min- Party – elected with massive red ister. A new constitution was writ- shirt support in a landslide in July ten, the military’s budget allocation 2011 – seems settled in government. Opposing Thaksin increased, and Thaksin supporters Certainly, royalist and yellow shirt were repressed as the elite sought to opponents have been sniping at the Thaksin was an odd threat to the con- negate Thaksin’s ‘populist’ appeal. government for alleged corruption, servative elite, given that he was one Despite this, and the dissolution of disloyalty to the monarchy, support- of Thailand’s richest men and formed the Thai Rak Thai Party, the elector- ing red shirt ‘terrorists’ and for being his Thai Rak Thai Party as essentially ate’s support for pro-Thaksin parties at Thaksin’s beck and call, but none a party for domestic businesses. Yet remained strong: his People’s Power of this has yet destabilised the gov- his arrogance and his strong-willed, Party (PPP) snatched a 2007 election ernment. This rapid political cooling aggressive policy implementation an- victory. has been possible because Yingluck noyed conservatives allied with the In 2008 – as the military effectively and her brother Thaksin have rec- monarchy’s state. When Thaksin won mutinied against the PPP govern- ognised that, in government, their an unprecedented landslide victory in ment, refusing to remove the yellow political aims are more likely to the 2005 election, the palace and the shirts occupying Bangkok’s airports be achieved through compromise, military worried that Thaksin was – the Constitutional Court hur- moderating radical demands and estabilshing a popularity that would ried through a ban on pro-Thaksin 28 Political Insight Since her 2011 election victory, Yingluck’s government has sought to keep influential General Prem Tinsulanonda (left) on side.Corbis politicians and parties. The military quickly shoehorned In the midst of a conflict over calls to amend thelèse Abhisit and the Democrat Party into government, a majesté law, Yutthisak was replaced by Air Chief Marshal move that quickly led to red shirt street protests. Sukumpol Suwanatat. Sukumpol, who had opposed With so much political capital invested in royalist the 2006 coup, was prepared to be tougher with the politics and keeping Thaksin and his supporters at bay, military elite and was trusted by Thaksin. Significantly, Yingluck’s election victory amounted to a rejection of The 2011 on the basis of seniority, he was not opposed by Privy the military, its coup and its royalist politics. Despite the election was a Council President and former prime minister General election rout, Thaksin and Yingluck identified the mili- rejection of the Prem Tinsulanonda. tary’s brute power, the palace’s propensity for interven- While the military has remained prickly in dealing tion and a royalist judiciary as significant threats to the military’s coup, with the government, the main points of possible con- new government. Party strategists developed strategies yet Yingluck flict appear to have been avoided. The government has to appease and sideline royalists. and Thaksin honoured the monarchy and refused consideration of decided not changes to the lèse majesté law. Red shirt activists were disappointed by this failure to address a law repeatedly Managing Military Machinations to directly used to jail compatriots, but the Pheu Thai leadership confront its recognised that the law was symbolic of the military’s The election result was a pointed rejection of the mili- leadership self-appointed role as protector of the monarchy. On the tary’s coup, yet Yingluck and Thaksin decided not to Thai–Cambodian border, where a dangerous conflict had confront its leadership. They proceeded carefully in seen the bilateral relationship collapse, some troops have choosing a Defence Minister. The initial choice, Gen- been withdrawn and nationalist fervour tempered. In eral Yutthisak Sasiprapha, was acceptable to the mili- the South, where an intractable insurgency has claimed tary but proved weak in managing the government’s some 5,000 lives since 2004, the government has not relationship with an antagonistic military top brass. confronted the military’s authority. During Thaksin’s December 2012 29 2006 coup and reflected a royalist effort to change the political rules, shifting power to unelected institutions. The anti-Thaksin alliance has vehemently opposed any change. The Yingluck government’s initial efforts at amendment provoked the Con- stitutional Court into a blatantly political intervention, ignoring its own procedures and the constitution to stymie change. Notably, the government – despite party and red shirt anger – has accepted this limitation and backed away from judicial confrontation. In cases involving lèse majesté and political charges against red shirts, the government has given ground to the conservative op- position. This has frustrated red shirts, but the government is reluctant to intervene where the palace is involved. It has quietly bailed red shirts jailed in 2010, although several lèse majesté prisoners remain incar- cerated, apparently considered by royalists as hardcore republicans. Placating the Palace Underlying political turmoil have been con- cerns regarding the future of the monarchy. In 2006, the junta claimed that Thaksin and his government – as well as showing ‘signs of rampant corruption, malfeasance, po- litical interference in government agencies and independent organization’ – engaged in ‘several actions verging on lèse majesté against His Majesty the King, who is highly respected by the Thai people’. The previous Surayud and Abhisit gov- ernments heavily promoted the monarchy, demanded loyalty to the monarchy’s state and used the lèse majesté law to suppress Red Shirt supporters of Thaksin Shinawatra wear masks of the exiled former Thai premier during opposition. Long involved in politics and a demonstration at the Democracy Monument in Bangkok, earlier this year. Corbis suspicious of elected politicians, palace propaganda spun the king’s interventions administration, his Southern intrusions royalists have used it to target Thaksin and as attempts to end national crises. It was the were resented, opposed and sabotaged. his allies with a plethora of cases unparal- 2006 coup that fully revealed the palace’s Yingluck hasn’t made the same mistake leled in modern times. The legal validity of politics: the coup’s leader General Sonthi and, as talks with the insurgents have ex- the cases matters little – it is the targeting Boonyaratglin and his junta met the king panded, the military’s support has gradu- that is politically significant. Amongst many and queen within hours of the coup and ally been won. In these circumstances, the cases, Thaksin lost 46 billion baht of his as- received palace approval, with Sonthi military has become quieter in its political sets (considered improperly gained) and he reporting that ‘the king was relaxed and interventions, with the outspoken Army and more than 200 other politicians were happy, smiling throughout’.
Recommended publications
  • Thailand's Red Networks: from Street Forces to Eminent Civil Society
    Southeast Asian Studies at the University of Freiburg (Germany) Occasional Paper Series www.southeastasianstudies.uni-freiburg.de Occasional Paper N° 14 (April 2013) Thailand’s Red Networks: From Street Forces to Eminent Civil Society Coalitions Pavin Chachavalpongpun (Kyoto University) Pavin Chachavalpongpun (Kyoto University)* Series Editors Jürgen Rüland, Judith Schlehe, Günther Schulze, Sabine Dabringhaus, Stefan Seitz The emergence of the red shirt coalitions was a result of the development in Thai politics during the past decades. They are the first real mass movement that Thailand has ever produced due to their approach of directly involving the grassroots population while campaigning for a larger political space for the underclass at a national level, thus being projected as a potential danger to the old power structure. The prolonged protests of the red shirt movement has exceeded all expectations and defied all the expressions of contempt against them by the Thai urban elite. This paper argues that the modern Thai political system is best viewed as a place dominated by the elite who were never radically threatened ‘from below’ and that the red shirt movement has been a challenge from bottom-up. Following this argument, it seeks to codify the transforming dynamism of a complicated set of political processes and actors in Thailand, while investigating the rise of the red shirt movement as a catalyst in such transformation. Thailand, Red shirts, Civil Society Organizations, Thaksin Shinawatra, Network Monarchy, United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship, Lèse-majesté Law Please do not quote or cite without permission of the author. Comments are very welcome. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the author in the first instance.
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 4: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report September 10, 2012 Country: Thailand Date of Election: July 3, 2011 Prepared by: King Prajadhipok’s Institute Date of Preparation: June 2011 NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: . The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] . If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [x] Parliamentary/Legislative [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ ] Upper House [x] Lower House [ ] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 4: Macro Report 2a. What was the party of the president prior to the most recent election, regardless of whether the election was presidential? - 2b. What was the party of the Prime Minister prior to the most recent election, regardless of whether the election was parliamentary? Democrat Party 2c.
    [Show full text]
  • War of Words: Isan Redshirt Activists and Discourses of Thai Democracy
    This is a repository copy of War of words: Isan redshirt activists and discourses of Thai democracy. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/104378/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Alexander, ST and McCargo, D orcid.org/0000-0002-4352-5734 (2016) War of words: Isan redshirt activists and discourses of Thai democracy. South East Asia Research, 24 (2). pp. 222-241. ISSN 0967-828X https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X16649045 © 2016, SOAS. This is an author produced version of a paper published in South East Asia Research. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ War of Words War of Words: Isan Redshirt Activists and Discourses of Thai Democracy Abstract Thai grassroots activists known as ‘redshirts’ (broadly aligned with former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra) have been characterized accordingly to their socio-economic profile, but despite pioneering works such as Buchanan (2013), Cohen (2012) and Uenaldi (2014), there is still much to learn about how ordinary redshirts voice their political stances.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    “PM STANDS ON HIS CRIPPLED LEGITINACY“ Wandah Waenawea CONCEPTS Political legitimacy:1 The foundation of such governmental power as is exercised both with a consciousness on the government’s part that it has a right to govern and with some recognition by the governed of that right. Political power:2 Is a type of power held by a group in a society which allows administration of some or all of public resources, including labor, and wealth. There are many ways to obtain possession of such power. Demonstration:3 Is a form of nonviolent action by groups of people in favor of a political or other cause, normally consisting of walking in a march and a meeting (rally) to hear speakers. Actions such as blockades and sit-ins may also be referred to as demonstrations. A political rally or protest Red shirt: The term5inology and the symbol of protester (The government of Abbhisit Wejjajiva). 1 Sternberger, Dolf “Legitimacy” in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (ed. D.L. Sills) Vol. 9 (p. 244) New York: Macmillan, 1968 2 I.C. MacMillan (1978) Strategy Formulation: political concepts, St Paul, MN, West Publishing; 3 Oxford English Dictionary Volume 1 | Number 1 | January-June 2013 15 Yellow shirt: The terminology and the symbol of protester (The government of Thaksin Shinawat). Political crisis:4 Is any unstable and dangerous social situation regarding economic, military, personal, political, or societal affairs, especially one involving an impending abrupt change. More loosely, it is a term meaning ‘a testing time’ or ‘emergency event. CHAPTER I A. Background Since 2008, there has been an ongoing political crisis in Thailand in form of a conflict between thePeople’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD) and the People’s Power Party (PPP) governments of Prime Ministers Samak Sundaravej and Somchai Wongsawat, respectively, and later between the Democrat Party government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva and the National United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Bangkok: Two Cities Petra Desatova
    Bangkok: Two Cities Petra Desatova Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, Volume 41, Number 2, August 2019, pp. 176-182 (Article) Published by ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/732131 Access provided at 9 Jan 2020 10:18 GMT from New Copenhagen University Library Bangkok: Two Cities PETRA DESATOVA Bangkok delivered one of the biggest surprises of Thailand’s March 2019 election, with the capital’s fickle voters amplifying larger national trends. Though popularly viewed as a stronghold for the storied Democrat Party, the history of Bangkok’s elections over the past 40 years has been distinctly mixed. Bangkok voters have shown an unparalleled willingness to embrace new parties—hence the landslide wins by Prachakorn Thai in 1979, Palang Dharma in 1992 and Thai Rak Thai in 2001. It was the Democrats that secured the majority of Bangkok seats in 2007 and 2011, on the strength of backing both from more affluent middle-class voters and low-income inner city communities in districts such as Bang Rak and Khlong Toei. In the 2011 elections, the Democrat Party won 23 out of the capital’s 33 constituency seats. Its main rival, Pheu Thai, secured the remaining ten seats. By contrast, in the March 2019 elections, the Democrat Party failed to secure even a single constituency seat in the capital. Out of 30 seats available, Pheu Thai won nine. The rest were split between two new parties: the pro-military Palang Pracharat Party (12) and the progressive Future Forward Party (9).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ongoing Insurgency in Southern Thailand: Trends in Violence, Counterinsurgency Operations, and the Impact of National Politics by Zachary Abuza
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 6 The Ongoing Insurgency in Southern Thailand: Trends in Violence, Counterinsurgency Operations, and the Impact of National Politics by Zachary Abuza Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Complex Operations, and Center for Strategic Conferencing. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, and publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Thai and U.S. Army Soldiers participate in Cobra Gold 2006, a combined annual joint training exercise involving the United States, Thailand, Japan, Singapore, and Indonesia. Photo by Efren Lopez, U.S. Air Force The Ongoing Insurgency in Southern Thailand: Trends in Violence, Counterinsurgency Operations, and the Impact of National Politics The Ongoing Insurgency in Southern Thailand: Trends in Violence, Counterinsurgency Operations, and the Impact of National Politics By Zachary Abuza Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 6 Series Editors: C. Nicholas Rostow and Phillip C. Saunders National Defense University Press Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand's Lengthening Roadmap to Elections
    Thailand’s Lengthening Roadmap to Elections Asia Report N°274 | 10 December 2015 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Road to the Roadmap ....................................................................................................... 3 III. Drafting the Twentieth Constitution ................................................................................ 6 A. First Draft................................................................................................................... 6 B. Roadmap Dead Ends ................................................................................................. 8 IV. The Road Ahead ............................................................................................................... 11 A. Revised Roadmap ...................................................................................................... 11 B. Incipient Praetorianism? ........................................................................................... 12 C. Economic Factors ...................................................................................................... 16 D. Dissent ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Love, Anger and Hate of the Red Shirts: the Contestation of Meanings of Politics and Justice
    Volume 20 No 2 (July-December) 2017 [Page 103-124] Love, Anger and Hate of the Red Shirts: The Contestation of Meanings of Politics and Justice Thannapat Jarenpanit * Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand Received 15 October 2017; Received in revised form 28 January 2018 Accepted 4 February 2018; Available online 7 March 2018 Abstract This article focuses on the cultural emotions of the red shirt supporters after the contexts of military coup in 2006. The patterns of emotions seen within the red shirt groups can help reveal their internal differences, and also the divisions and conflicts that exist there in. I will examine this issue by focusing on an analysis of the affective emotions of love (a positive emotion), anger and hate (negative emotions) displayed by the red shirt groups from Chiang Mai and Bangkok. These emotions can reflect the contestation of meanings of politics, democracy and justice among the social sub-groups and individuals who joined the red shirt protests during the last decade of Thailand’ s political conflicts. This situation, containing different cultural emotions and political meanings, has led to a deeply divided Thai population in terms of the country’s politics and society. To understand the diversity of social characteristics and actions that exist within the red shirt groups, one cannot see emotions as static; as emotions vary in terms of their meanings, levels and dynamics, based on the contexts and cultures within which they are experienced. Keywords Cultural emotions, Contestation, The red shirts, Politics, Justice * Corresponding author: [email protected] DOI: 10.14456/tureview.2017.12 Jarenpanit, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Demonology, Dehumanization, and Contemporary Thai Politics
    Asia-Pacific Social Science Review 19(2) 2019, pp. 115–130 RESEARCH ARTICLE Political Demonology, Dehumanization, and Contemporary Thai Politics Siwach Sripokangkul1* and Mark S. Cogan2 1Khon Kaen University, Thailand 2Kansai Gaidai University, Japan [email protected] Abstract: The employment of acts of political demonology has become common among power holders in Thai society. Demonization campaigns trace back to the early 1970s when Thai nationalists deemed Communists to be “beasts in human clothing.” This paper reviews demonization strategies employed by power holders (countersubversives) to undermine, marginalize, and repress anti-government protesters (subversives), beginning with the formative 1970s student movements, and continuing through the 2014 military coup d’état. We argue through a series of vignettes that the Thai elites have conveniently labeled anti-government protesters and their mobilization networks as demons, trolls, or animals due to their supposed threats to the Thai state, its monarchy, or national religion. Keywords: political demonology, Thailand, dehumanization, state violence, repression Demonology, or regarding others as non-human Although demonology has been accredited with or as being unwelcome, is a phenomenon that has origins in the United States because of Rogin’s been around as long as political society itself. The work, there are oft-cited examples elsewhere, such political variety is primarily derived from Michael as the Nazi dissemination of a massive ideological Rogin’s (1987) book, “Ronald Reagan, The Movie dehumanization of a host of other groups of people, and Other Episodes in Political Demonology, which devaluing these groups as lower forms of life, called to the attention the creation of monsters as a commonly associated with animals (Steizinger, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Translating Thailand's Protests: an Analysis of Red Shirt Rhetoric
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Directory of Open Access Journals ASEAS 6(1) Aktuelle Südostasienforschung / Current Research on South-East Asia Translating Thailand’s Protests: An Analysis of Red Shirt Rhetoric James Buchanan1 Citation Buchanan, J. (2013). Translating Thailand’s protests: An analysis of Red Shirt rhetoric. ASEAS – Austrian Jour- nal of South-East Asian Studies, 6(1), 60-80. From 14 March 2010 onwards, a mass of suea daeng, literally ‘red shirts’, began a prolonged, mass protest in Bangkok, which eventually degenerated into the worst political violence Thailand has seen in its modern history, leaving 91 people dead, around 2,000 injured, and a city smoldering from rioting and arson. This article provides a narrative of the protests and the Red Shirt move- ment which is informed by my own eye-witness account of the events and built around the transla- tion of Thai language sources I encountered. By translating and analyzing original Thai language sources from the protests, e.g. banners, signs, t-shirts, speeches, and graffi ti, I argue that the Red Shirts have a more sophisticated, far-reaching political philosophy than many give them credit for. Also, as events unfolded, the movement developed and grew beyond its original scope by demand- ing justice for victims of the military crackdowns and challenging the political role of the monar- chy. Both as a political movement and as a sizeable section of the electorate, the Red Shirts have the potential to drastically reconfi gure Thailand’s social and political landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Summary and Key Recommendations: Photo Feature
    Thailand H U M A N Descent into Chaos R I G H T S Thailand’s 2010 Red Shirt Protests and the Government Crackdown WATCH Summary and Key Recommendations Human Rights Watch | May 2011 Surrendered Red Shirt protesters are blindfolded and have their hands tied behind their back by soldiers on May 19, 2010 in Bangkok. © 2010 Jan Grarup/NOOR There will be blood on the street if the government does not call off the dispersal operations. Our patience is running out. We will take more serious measures to retaliate. The dark sky will turn red, red like blood. Jatuporn Prompan, Red Shirt leader, Bangkok, April 10, 2010 It is hard for the army to give explanations about every single dead body in Bangkok. Col. Sansern Kaewkamnerd, Center for the Resolution of the Emergency Situation (CRES) spokesman, Bangkok, June 7, 2010. DESCENT INTO CHAOS Thailand’s 2010 Red Shirt Protests and the Government Crackdown Thai soldiers fire live rounds into the air During the mass political mobilization from March (background) and rubber bullets at Red Shirt protesters (foreground) at the Phadung Krung to May 2010, Thailand endured the most violent Kasem intersection in Bangkok, during the confrontations since the protests against military dispersal of the Phan Fa Bridge protest site on April 10, 2010. rule in 1992. At least 90 people died and more © 2010 Agnes Dherbeys/VII Mentor Program than 2,000 were wounded in clashes between security forces and anti-government protesters led by the United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD), also known as “Red Shirts.” Arson attacks in Bangkok and elsewhere caused billions of dollars of damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Isan: Double Trouble Saowanee T
    Isan: Double Trouble Saowanee T. Alexander Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, Volume 41, Number 2, August 2019, pp. 183-189 (Article) Published by ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/732132 Access provided at 9 Jan 2020 10:19 GMT from New Copenhagen University Library Isan: Double Trouble SAOWANEE T. ALEXANDER “Khao ao ngoen phai, ka lueak Pheu Thai khue kao” [It doesn’t matter whose money they take, they will vote for Pheu Thai like before], a concession stand owner on campus told the author two days after the Palang Pracharat Party had held a mass rally at Ubon Ratchathani University—an unprecedented opportunity for any Thai political party. She had attended the rally, for which village-level coordinators had arranged transportation and collated the names of attendees. Upon being asked by the author whether the attendees would get paid, the concession stand owner merely smiled and said that she did not know. Instead of pressing for an answer, the author decided to wait anxiously for election day to find out whether the lady was right about Pheu Thai’s prospects. For almost 20 years, Thailand’s Northeast region (Isan) has strongly supported the Pheu Thai Party and its precursor parties closely associated with former prime ministers Thaksin Shinawatra and Yingluck Shinawatra. The region is also the bastion of the Red Shirt movement, a loose-knit, self-proclaimed “pro-democracy” alliance which staged large mass protests against the unelected government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva in 2009 and 2010.
    [Show full text]