Breeding Seasonality and Reproductive Success of White-Fronted Bee-Eaters in Kenya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Breeding Seasonality and Reproductive Success of White-Fronted Bee-Eaters in Kenya BREEDING SEASONALITY AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF WHITE-FRONTED BEE-EATERS IN KENYA PETER H. WREGE1'2 AND STEPHEN T. EMLEN 1'2 •Sectionof Neurobiologyand Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York15853 USA, and 2NationalMuseums of Kenya,Nairobi, Kenya ABSTR•CT.--White-frontedBee-eaters (Merops bullockoides) at Nakuru, Kenya, reproduce in an environmentwhere foodsupply for provisioningnestlings is unpredictableand generally scarce.With data from 8 yr of study on three populationsof bee-eaters,we examinedhow these environmental conditionshave influenced the timing of breeding and patterns of nesting success. Breedingcoincided with the generalpattern of rainfall in the Rift Valley. Kenyaexperiences two rainy seasonsper year, and individual bee-eatersbred with eitherthe long or the short rains,but not both. Membersof a givenpopulation bred coloniallyand quitesynchronously, but membersof adjacentpopulations were often out of phasewith one another.As a result, the distributionof long- and short-rainsbreeding populations formed a spatialmosaic. Reproductivesuccess was highly variablebut typically low. Mean (+SD) fledging success was 0.57 + 0.83 young, and only one nest in four produced an independent offspring (6 monthsof age). Most prefledgingmortality (88%)was due to egg lossesand the starvation of young. Very little (7%) was attributableto predation.Social factors, primarily intraspecific nest parasitism,were responsiblefor nearly half of all egg losses,and representan important costof group living. Starvation,the singlemost important source of prefledgingmortality, claimedthe lives of 48%of all hatchlings.Starvation was greatestat times of low food availability,in nestswith large broods,and in neststended by pairs without helpers. Hatching was asynchronous.This enhancedthe ability of older nestlingsto monopolize limited food supplies,and resulted in the selectivedeath of the smallestnestling first. Such brood reduction, coupled with the ability of nestlingsto slow their developmentrate in responseto food stress,is consideredan adaptationfor copingwith the unpredictablevari- ation in food supply commonly faced by these birds. Received17 August1990, accepted18 January1991. EVOLUTIONARYprocesses act through vari- of breeding as it relates to the annual pattern. ability in the lifetime reproductive output of We then provide reproductive successstatistics, individuals. An understanding of how selec- quantify sourcesof egg and nestling mortality, tion hasshaped the different componentsof life and discuss the influence of environmental con- histories depends on knowledge of the sources ditions on reproductive output and the evolu- of variability in reproductive success. tion of life history patterns. For 8 yr we have studied the social dynamics and reproductivesuccess of individually marked METHODS White-fronted Bee-eaters(Merops bullockoides) in the central Rift Valley of Kenya. These birds This study was conducted in Lake Nakuru Na- are nonmigratory, cooperativebreeders that live tional Park, Kenya. The bulk of our data come from throughout the year in coloniesof 25-400 in- 8 yr of concentratedstudy of 3 populations:Makalia dividuals. Three populations were studied in- (1977-1979), Badlands (1977-1978), and Baharini tensively, and known individuals were moni- (1980-1984).A fourth population (Enderit) was mon- tored continuously for 3-7 yr (depending on itored in 1977,and thesedata are included in analyses population). Helpers at the nest were a con- of seasonalityand overall reproductive success.Ad- ditional data obtained from the Baharini population spicuousfeature of the social system,and we (1985-1986)as well asother populationsin and around detailed their influence on measuresof repro- the national park are included in someanalyses, as ductive successelsewhere (Emlen and Wrege noted. 1991). White-fronted Bee-eaters are colonial, roosting In this paper we describethe salient features throughout the year, and breeding, in holesexcavated of resourceavailability and examine the timing 1-2 m into vertical earth banks or cliffs. These birds 673 The Auk 108: 673-687. July 1991 674 W•aE ANDEMLEN [Auk, Vol. 108 feed almost exclusively on flying insects,and ex- predatorsat Nakuru to snakesand mongooses,both tended family groups(clans) defend foraging terri- of which are known to consume the entire nest toriesin savannahabitat surrounding the colonysite contentsin one visit. MadagascarHarrier Hawks (for a general descriptionof the socialstructure and (Polyboroidesradiatus) and various small falcons cooperativebreeding behavior, see Emlen 1990).All might take single nestlingsfrom hole entrances, adultswere identified individually by permanentleg but we rarely saw these predatorsat our study bands and plastic wing tags,and were sexedby lap- colonies. arotomywhen in adult plumage. 4. Other eggloss--all lossesof eggs not meeting the criteria above. Mr•SUR•M,wrr oF REPRODUCrIVE SUCCESS 5. Nestlingstarvation--young that disappearedsingly and for which there was prior evidence of mor- Behavioralobservations.--Behavioral aspects of nest- phological retardation of the individual (83% of ing phenology of the breeding colonies were ob- cases) or of nestmates. Often we found the car- served daily (2-5 observationhours per colony).In- cassesof suchnestlings either in the nestchamber formation on nest activity and failure, as well as or discardedbelow the colony. changesin the compositionof groupstending specific 6. Other nestlingloss--losses of nestlingsnot attrib- nests, was obtained from such observations. utable to either starvationor predation. Nestchecks.--We checked all activenests at regular 7. HorusSwifts--occasionally Horus Swifts (Apusho- intervals with a "ripariascope": a tube of adjustable rus)actively took over bee-eaternest chambersby length that contains lenses, lights, and a terminal enteringand pushingout eggsor killing nestlings mirror (Demongand Emlen1975). During egglaying, by puncturing them with their claws. nestswere checkeddaily (Baharini population)or ev- 8. Catastrophiclosses--eggs or young lost to severe ery secondday (Makalia, Badlands,and Enderit pop- environmental conditions (e.g. flooding or cave- ulations).Checks usually beganbefore the first egg, ins causedby heavy rains, rising streamlevels, or with supplementalchecks whenever unusualbehav- both). ior was suspected(e.g. intraspecificnest parasitism). Fledglingsurvival to independence.--Wecalculated Nest contentswere monitored periodically through- survivorshipfrom fledging to independencefor the out incubation but daily throughout the expected Baharini population from monthly censusdata. Al- hatching period. Checkscontinued at intervals of 3- though fledglings reach adult foraging proficiency 5 daysto monitorthe growth and fate of all nestlings. approximately6 weeksafter fledging (2.5 monthsof Beforefledging, eachsurviving nestlingwas removed from its nest hole, banded with a numbered alumi- age), they remain with the family unit and do not molt into the definitive adult plumageuntil 6 months num band, weighed, measured,and returned to the nest. of age. We usedthe plumagecriterion to define full independence.Survivorship was defined as the per- Nestingsuccess.--Actual fledging from the nest was centageof nestlingsthat reachedmorphological age not always observed, primarily becausethe age at 25 that were still alive at 6 monthsof age. fledging varied from a norm of 28-30 daysup to 42 Data from the Makalia and Badlands populations daysfor individuals with slowed development(Em- were not used in survival analyses.From 1978-1979, len et al. in press).Although chronologicalage varied, nestlingswere fitted with wing tagsjust before fledg- all nestlingsthat successfullyfledged first attained ing, and we suspectthat mortality was substantially morphologicalage 25 (i.e. the stageof morphological higher on fledglingswith tagsthan on thosewithout developmenttypically completedin 25 daysby well- (Emlen unpubl. obs.).Consequently, young from the fed nestlings).We thereforeused this morphological criterion as a standardized estimate of successful Baharini population were not given wing tags until approximately6 months of age. fledging. Sourcesof eggand nestling mortality.--All losseswere classifedto presumedcause of mortality accordingto ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING the following criteria: Insect availability was considereda possiblepre- I. Unhatchedeggs--eggs still present in the nest dictor of reproductive success.Rainfall influenced in- chamberwhen the oldest nestling was 5 days old sect abundance, and local weather conditions (hours (longest span for entire clutchesto hatch was 4 of rain, strength of wind, etc.) affectedboth the flight days). activity of insects and the ability of bee-eatersto 2. Desertion--eggsstill present in the nest chamber capturethem. The availabilty of insectsto foraging when, before full-term incubation, the birds ceased bee-eaterswas therefore representedin analysesby incubation and roosting at that nest. variables of insect abundance, rainfall, and their in- 3. Predation(of eggsor young)--entire nestcontents teraction. that disappearedbetween two successivechecks RainfalL--Monthly total precipitationand number separatedby <6 days. Such losseswere usually of dayswith >0.5 mm of rain were derivedfrom daily detectedwithin 2 days.Hole-nesting limits likely precipitationdata recordedat the national park head- July1991] ReproductiveSuccess inBee-eaters 675 quarters,3 km from the Baharini population (Fig. 1). There was no significantdifference in the amountor
Recommended publications
  • Nakuru County
    Kenya County Climate Risk Profile Nakuru County Map Book Contents Agro-Ecological Zones Baseline Map ………………….…………………………………………………………... 1 Baseline Map ………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………... 2 Elevation Map ...…………………….……………………………………………………………………………………..... 3 Farming Systems Map ……………….…….…………………………………………………………………………...... 4 Land Cover Map …………...……………………………………………………………………………………………...... 5 Livestock Production Systems Map ..…………………………………………………………………………......... 6 Mean Precipitation Map ……………….……………………………………………………………………………....... 7 Mean Temperature Map ……………………………………………………………………………………………....... 8 Population Density Map .………………………………………………………………………….…………………...... 9 Satellite Map .……………………………………………………………..………………………………………………... 10 Soil Classes Map ..……………………………………………………………………………………………..………...... 11 Travel Time Map ……………….…………………………………………………………………………………..…...... 12 AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONES a i o p ! ! i ! g ! ! ! k ! n i ! i ! ! ! ! r ! ! ! a ! ! a L ! ! !! ! ! ! ! B ! ! Solai ! ! ! ! Subukia ! ! ! ! ! ! Athinai ! ! ! ! Moto ! ! Bahati ! ! Rongai Kabarak N ! ! ! Menengai ! ! ! ! y Molo ! ! Dondori ! Turi ! a ! Nakuru ! ! ! Keusa Lanet Kio ! Elburgon ! ! ! Sasamua ! ! Chesingele Njoro n ! ! ! d N a k u r u ! ! ! ! Keringet ! a Kiriri ! Kariandusi ! Mukuki ! ! Elmentaita r Kabsege ! Gilgil ! ! Likia ! u East Mau ! ! ! a Olenguruone Mau ! ! F Cheptwech ! Narok ! ! ! Ambusket ! ! ! Morendat ! ! ! ! Naivasha ! ! Marangishu ! ! ! ! Ngunyumu Kangoni ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Longonot ! ! ! u ! ! ! b Akira Mai ! ! ! Legend ! Mahiu N a r o k ! m ! Town ! Agro-ecological
    [Show full text]
  • 469880Esw0whit10cities0rep
    Report No. 46988 Public Disclosure Authorized &,7,(62)+23(" GOVERNANCE, ECONOMIC AND HUMAN CHALLENGES OF KENYA’S FIVE LARGEST CITIES Public Disclosure Authorized December 2008 Water and Urban Unit 1 Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank __________________________ This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without written authorization from the World Bank. ii PREFACE The objective of this sector work is to fill existing gaps in the knowledge of Kenya’s five largest cities, to provide data and analysis that will help inform the evolving urban agenda in Kenya, and to provide inputs into the preparation of the Kenya Municipal Program (KMP). This overview report is first report among a set of six reports comprising of the overview report and five city-specific reports for Nairobi, Mombasa, Kisumu, Nakuru and Eldoret. The study was undertaken by a team comprising of Balakrishnan Menon Parameswaran (Team Leader, World Bank); James Mutero (Consultant Team Leader), Simon Macharia, Margaret Ng’ayu, Makheti Barasa and Susan Kagondu (Consultants). Matthew Glasser, Sumila Gulyani, James Karuiru, Carolyn Winter, Zara Inga Sarzin and Judy Baker (World Bank) provided support and feedback during the entire course of work. The work was undertaken collaboratively with UN Habitat, represented by David Kithkaye and Kerstin Sommers in Nairobi. The team worked under the guidance of Colin Bruce (Country Director, Kenya) and Jamie Biderman (Sector Manager, AFTU1). The team also wishes to thank Abha Joshi-Ghani (Sector Manager, FEU-Urban), Junaid Kamal Ahmad (Sector Manager, SASDU), Mila Freire (Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Participation in County Integrated Development Planning and Budgeting Processes in Kenya
    A Report of Trócaire Kenya A Report of Trócaire Kenya Citizen participation in County Integrated Development Planning and budgeting processes in Kenya A case of five Counties A Report of Trócaire Kenya Acknowledgements This research project was commissioned by Trócaire Kenya, and our sincere gratitude goes to all those who contributed towards its success. Special thanks to the respondents from the project areas for their co-operation and input. The contribution by respondents from The County Government, The National Government, communities, civil society and all other stakeholders interviewed is highly appreciated. Recognition goes to the support received from the government of Ireland through Irish Aid for their continued contribution to Trócaire’s work and supporting this research. © Trócaire, Kenya, 2019 2 Table of Contents A Report of Trócaire Kenya 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 4 GLOSSARY 5 ABOUT TRÓCAIRE 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION 13 INTEGRATED PLANNING & BUDGETING AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND PRACTICE 20 STUDY FINDINGS 37 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 Glossary ADP Annual Development Plan AG Attorney General CBEF County Budget and Economic Forum CDB County Development Board CECM County Executive Committee Member CFSP County Fiscal Strategy Paper CGs County Governments CGA County Government Act CGA2012 County Government Act (2012) CIDP County Integrated Development Plan CIMES County Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation System CLIDP Community-Level Infrastructure Development Programme OCOB Office of Controller of Budget
    [Show full text]
  • KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS Kenya Population Situation Analysis Published by the Government of Kenya supported by United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce National Council for Population and Development (NCPD) P.O. Box 48994 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-271-1600/01 Fax: +254-20-271-6058 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ncpd-ke.org United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Kenya Country Oce P.O. Box 30218 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254-20-76244023/01/04 Fax: +254-20-7624422 Website: http://kenya.unfpa.org © NCPD July 2013 The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the contributors. Any part of this document may be freely reviewed, quoted, reproduced or translated in full or in part, provided the source is acknowledged. It may not be sold or used inconjunction with commercial purposes or for prot. KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS JULY 2013 KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS i ii KENYA POPULATION SITUATION ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................ix ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..........................................................................................................................x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................xi
    [Show full text]
  • I. General Overview Development Partners Are Insisting on the Full
    UNITED NATIONS HUMANITARIAN UPDATE vol. 40 6 November – 20 November 2008 Office of the United Nations Humanitarian Coordinator in Kenya HIGHLIGHTS • Donors pressure government on the implementation of Waki and Kriegler reports • Kenya Red Cross appeals for US$ 7. 5 million for 300,000 people requiring humanitarian aid due to recent flash floods, landslides and continued conflict • Kenyan military in rescue operation along Kenya-Somalia border The information contained in this report has been compiled by OCHA from information received from the field, from national and international humanitarian partners and from other official sources. It does not represent a position from the United Nations. This report is posted on: http://ochaonline.un.org/kenya I. General Overview Development partners are insisting on the full implementation of the Waki and Kriegler reports to facilitate further development and put an end to impunity. Twenty-five diplomatic missions in Nairobi, including the US, Canada and the European Union countries have piled pressure for the implementation of the report whose key recommendations was the setting up of a special tribunal to try the financiers, perpetrators and instigators of the violence that rocked the country at the beginning of this year. The European Union has threatened aid sanctions should the Waki Report not be implemented. An opinion poll by Strategic Research Limited found that 55.8 per cent of respondents supported the full implementation of the report on post-lection violence. On 19 November, Parliament moved to chart the path of implementing the Waki Report by forming two committees to provide leadership on the controversial findings.
    [Show full text]
  • CHOLERA COUNTRY PROFILE: KENYA Last Update: 29 April 2010
    WO RLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION Global Task Force on Cholera Control CHOLERA COUNTRY PROFILE: KENYA Last update: 29 April 2010 General Country Information: The Republic of Kenya is located in eastern Africa, and borders Ethiopia, Somalia, Tanzania, Uganda and Sudan with an east coast along the Indian Ocean. Kenya is divided into eight provinces: Central, Coast, Eastern, North Eastern, Nyanza, Rift Valley and Western and Nairobi. The provinces are further subdivided into 69 districts. Nairobi, the capital, is the largest city of Kenya. In 1885, Kenya was made a German protectorate over the Sultan of Zanzibar and coastal areas were progressively taken over by British establishments especially in the costal areas. Hostilities between German military forces and British troops (supported by Indian Army troops) were to end in 1918 as the Armistice of the first World War was signed. Kenya gained its independence from Great Britain in December 1963 when a government was formed by Jomo Kenyatta head of the KANU party (Kenya National African Union). Kenya's economy is highly dependant on tourism and Nairobi is the primary communication and financial hub of East Africa. It enjoys the region's best transportation linkages, communications infrastructure, and trained personnel. Many foreign firms maintain regional branches or representative offices in the city. Since December 2007, following the national elections, Kenya has been affected by political turmoil and violent rampages in several parts of the country leading to economic and humanitarian crisis. Kenya's Human Development Index is 147 over 182. The major cause of mortality and morbidity is malaria. Malnutrition rates are high (around 50'000 malnourished children and women in 27 affected districts in 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • County Name County Code Location
    COUNTY NAME COUNTY CODE LOCATION MOMBASA COUNTY 001 BANDARI COLLEGE KWALE COUNTY 002 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT MATUGA KILIFI COUNTY 003 PWANI UNIVERSITY TANA RIVER COUNTY 004 MAU MAU MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL LAMU COUNTY 005 LAMU FORT HALL TAITA TAVETA 006 TAITA ACADEMY GARISSA COUNTY 007 KENYA NATIONAL LIBRARY WAJIR COUNTY 008 RED CROSS HALL MANDERA COUNTY 009 MANDERA ARIDLANDS MARSABIT COUNTY 010 ST. STEPHENS TRAINING CENTRE ISIOLO COUNTY 011 CATHOLIC MISSION HALL, ISIOLO MERU COUNTY 012 MERU SCHOOL THARAKA-NITHI 013 CHIAKARIGA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL EMBU COUNTY 014 KANGARU GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL KITUI COUNTY 015 MULTIPURPOSE HALL KITUI MACHAKOS COUNTY 016 MACHAKOS TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE MAKUENI COUNTY 017 WOTE TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE NYANDARUA COUNTY 018 ACK CHURCH HALL, OL KALAU TOWN NYERI COUNTY 019 NYERI PRIMARY SCHOOL KIRINYAGA COUNTY 020 ST.MICHAEL GIRLS BOARDING MURANGA COUNTY 021 MURANG'A UNIVERSITY COLLEGE KIAMBU COUNTY 022 KIAMBU INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY TURKANA COUNTY 023 LODWAR YOUTH POLYTECHNIC WEST POKOT COUNTY 024 MTELO HALL KAPENGURIA SAMBURU COUNTY 025 ALLAMANO HALL PASTORAL CENTRE, MARALAL TRANSZOIA COUNTY 026 KITALE MUSEUM UASIN GISHU 027 ELDORET POLYTECHNIC ELGEYO MARAKWET 028 IEBC CONSTITUENCY OFFICE - ITEN NANDI COUNTY 029 KAPSABET BOYS HIGH SCHOOL BARINGO COUNTY 030 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT, KABARNET LAIKIPIA COUNTY 031 NANYUKI HIGH SCHOOL NAKURU COUNTY 032 NAKURU HIGH SCHOOL NAROK COUNTY 033 MAASAI MARA UNIVERSITY KAJIADO COUNTY 034 MASAI TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE KERICHO COUNTY 035 KERICHO TEA SEC. SCHOOL
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya 1St Mover PPP Road Projects
    MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT, INFRASTRUCTURE, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STATE DEPARTMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE Kenya 1st Mover PPP Road Projects 14TH March, 2017 Eng. Peter M. Mundinia Director General, Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA) 1 CONTENTS . Nairobi Southern Bypass . Mombasa – Nairobi . Nairobi – Thika Highway . Rironi – Naivasha – Nakuru . Nyali Bridge 2 Nairobi Southern O&M PPP Project • Construction commenced early 2012 and is expected to be completed by May 2016. • 28.6km of dual carriageway with 12 km of slip roads and 8.5 km Service Roads • Design speed of 100 km/hr. • Pavement Design: loading of 40 M CESA 3 Toll Plaza Location Toll Plaza Location Just to the West of Ngong Road Intersection Proposed: Toll Plaza Location South of Langata Road I/C 4 Toll Plaza Layout 5 Nairobi Southern Bypass Investments include: Toll plaza to the west of Ngong Road; Provision of containment barriers on both sides of the central reserve; Local improvements to the interchange slip roads; Improvements to the Nairobi National Park and Ngong Forest perimeter fencing; Weighbridges CAPEX - 4 WIMs 6 Widening of Ngong Road • Full on-line dualling of Ngong Road from the Dagoretti Corner (Junction Mall) to the Ngong Road Interchange over a total distance of 3.28km with service roads on both sides. • Upgrading of the Dagoretti Corner junction by provision of a viaduct for through traffic city bound on Ngong Road 7 Possible Additional CAPEX ADDITIONAL CAPEX (M KSH) Widening of Ngong Road 3,595.0 Interchange at Gitaru/A8 upgrade works - local Improvements
    [Show full text]
  • Nakuru County Brochure
    U.S. GOVERNMENT INVESTMENTS IN NAKURU COUNTY STRENGTHENING DEMOCRACY AND MUTUAL SECURITY Collaborating with the Government of Kenya and its people panning more than five decades, to build a peaceful, secure, and democratic society the U.S.-Kenya partnership is a The Kenyan Constitution is a remarkable document that is built tapestry of ties in government, upon the values of freedom, equality, justice, and human rights – values that are shared by the American people. To achieve Sbusiness, academia, development, and the great promise of Kenya’s Constitution, we will partner with civil society. Each year, the American Kenya to strengthen democratic institutions, address ethnic divisions, fight corruption, and help ensure freedom of the people invest close to $1 billion (100 media and space for civil society. In particular, we are working to billion Kenyan shillings) in Kenya support both the national and county levels of government to to advance our mutual security, implement devolution. prosperity, and democratic values. We support Kenyan citizens as they seek to be more actively engaged in their democracy by learning how national and county governments work and finding ways for them to have a Our investment in Kenya’s future is voice in both. guided by the great promise of the 2010 Human rights and social protections are important to the Kenya Constitution and Kenya’s own security of Kenyans. We collaborate with civil society to ensure development goals. Through strong Kenyans can enjoy their human, civil, and labor rights, particularly within marginalized communities. partnerships with the national and Reducing crime and violent extremism ensures greater security county governments, civil society, and both at home and around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Nakuru – Mau Summit (A8) Highway (Ppp) Project
    PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE NAIROBI - NAKURU – MAU SUMMIT (A8) HIGHWAY (PPP) PROJECT RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN LEAD EXPERT ADDRESS PROPONENT ADDRESS Charles and Barker Limited Kenya National Highways Authority Upper Hill Devan Plaza, 4th Floor, Suite 4 P. O. BOX 49712 – 00100 Nairobi, Kenya Crossway Road, off Chiromo Road, Westlands, TEL: +254 2989000, +254 20 8013842, +254 20 P.O. Box 1784-00606 495400, +254 20 2889000 Tel +254-020-8008640 CELL: +254 731 330336; +254 700 423606 Nairobi, Kenya EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.kenha.co.ke Blue Shield Towers, Upper Hill, Nairobi JULY 2018 Proposed Development, Operations and Maintenance of the Nairobi - Nakuru – Mau Summit (A8) Highway (PPP) Project - Resettlement Action Plan CITATION This report should be cited as: KeNHA(2018). RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN for the Proposed Development, Operations and Maintenance of the Nairobi - Nakuru – Mau Summit (A8) highway (PPP) Project between (x) 236820.65, (y) 9874606.05 (Arc- 1960-UTM-Zone-37S) and (x) 799767.25 (y) 9982461.45 (Arc-1960-UTM-Zone-36S) - Charles and Barker Limited, Nairobi, Kenya. Charles & Barker Ltd is a consultancy firm established in Kenya to provide services in environmental and natural resources that meets local and international best practices. Their objective is to remain at the forefront of technology by liaising with reputable individuals and organisations to deliver consultancy services. The services offered by the firm include but are not limited to: Environmental due diligence, environmental impact assessment, environmental auditing, monitoring for environmental aspects, remediation studies, environmental and social baseline studies and natural resource and earth science studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure1: the Map of Kenya Showing 47 Counties (Colored) and 295 Sub-Counties (Numbered)
    BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) BMJ Global Health Additional file 1: The county and sub counties of Kenya Figure1: The map of Kenya showing 47 counties (colored) and 295 sub-counties (numbered). The extents of major lakes and the Indian Ocean are shown in light blue. The names of the counties and sub- counties corresponding to the shown numbers below the maps. List of Counties (bold) and their respective sub county (numbered) as presented in Figure 1 1. Baringo county: Baringo Central [1], Baringo North [2], Baringo South [3], Eldama Ravine [4], Mogotio [5], Tiaty [6] 2. Bomet county: Bomet Central [7], Bomet East [8], Chepalungu [9], Konoin [10], Sotik [11] 3. Bungoma county: Bumula [12], Kabuchai [13], Kanduyi [14], Kimilili [15], Mt Elgon [16], Sirisia [17], Tongaren [18], Webuye East [19], Webuye West [20] 4. Busia county: Budalangi [21], Butula [22], Funyula [23], Matayos [24], Nambale [25], Teso North [26], Teso South [27] 5. Elgeyo Marakwet county: Keiyo North [28], Keiyo South [29], Marakwet East [30], Marakwet West [31] 6. Embu county: Manyatta [32], Mbeere North [33], Mbeere South [34], Runyenjes [35] Macharia PM, et al. BMJ Global Health 2020; 5:e003014. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003014 BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) BMJ Global Health 7. Garissa: Balambala [36], Dadaab [37], Dujis [38], Fafi [39], Ijara [40], Lagdera [41] 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Community Led Total Sanitation in Turkana County
    KARANJA, NZISA & GATHU 41st WEDC International Conference, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya, 2018 TRANSFORMATION TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT WASH SERVICES Implementing community led total sanitation in Turkana County P. Karanja, E. Nzisa & C. Gathu (Kenya) PAPER 2939 Practical Action has been employing participatory approaches like Community Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) in Turkana to encourage communities to take initiative in addressing sanitation issues. CLTS is a process where communities are mobilized to completely eliminate open defecation (OD); mobilization focuses on helping communities understand the health risks of OD and use disgust and shame as “triggers” to promote action, which ultimately lead to the construction and use of locally-built low-cost household latrines. Sustainable WASH in fragile contexts (SWIFT) project implemented by Practical Action in Turkana County aimed at improving access to water, sanitation and hygiene practices among target communities. The sanitation component of the project was delivered using CLTS method; challenges experienced in the process enabled learning on modification of the approach and will inform design and execution of future programming in Turkana County and other semi-arid areas. Context analysis – Turkana County Turkana County is the Largest County in Kenya which is arid and semi-arid and is characterized by warm and hot climate. The county is sparsely populated and mostly inhabited by pastoralists. 95% of the population live below the absolute poverty line and is among the counties with the lowest WASH coverage in Kenya. Poor sanitation is the second leading issue faced by communities in Turkana County after water scarcity. Approximately 82 % of the population has low access and use of sanitation facilities which significantly impacts on their health and development.
    [Show full text]