Dominance Rank and Interference Competition in Foraging Among Six Species of Birds in a Park in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dominance Rank and Interference Competition in Foraging Among Six Species of Birds in a Park in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan Taiwan J For Sci 26(3): 255-66, 2011 255 Research paper Dominance Rank and Interference Competition in Foraging among Six Species of Birds in a Park in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan Chao-Chieh Chen,") Hui-Yu Wu,2'3) Tzu-Tsen Liu,')Bao-Sen Shieh') [ Summary Through body size, social interaction, and foraging behavior, we investigated the dominance rank and interference competition among 6 bird species foraging at a park feeding site in Kaohsi- ung City, Taiwan. Social interactions and foraging behaviors of these birds were recorded in June to September 2009. David's scores were calculated from an interspecific interaction matrix, and the score roughly increased with the body size of birds, but some exceptions were noted. Concern- ing foraging behavior, feral pigeons (Columba livia) and Spotted-necked Doves (Streptopelia chi- nensis) took over the food area once they appeared even though Tree Sparrows (Passer montanus) usually arrived first. A linear regression model indicated that the number of Tree Sparrows outside the food area was positively correlated with the number of feral pigeons and Spotted-necked Doves inside the food area. Feral pigeons and Spotted-necked Doves moved away as the food was gradu- ally consumed, and smaller species accordingly increased their foraging in the food area. Never- theless, the Tree Sparrow was also suppressed by other medium-sized birds, like the White-vented Myna (Acridotheres javanicus) and Chinese Bulbul (Pycnonotus sinensis), and they eventually oc- cupied the food area in large numbers at a later stage. This study revealed that body size did matter and the Tree Sparrow was clearly the least dominant species among the 6. However, a discrepancy between the dominance status and interference competition in foraging was apparent. In addition to David's score, we suggest incorporating body size, group size, and interference competition to reach a more-comprehensive dominance hierarchy in bird communities. Key words: David's score, dominance hierarchy, dove, foraging behavior, Tree Sparrow. Chen CC, Wu 11Y, Liu TT, Shieh BS. 2011. Dominance rank and interference competition in for- aging among six species of birds in a park in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. Taiwan J For Sci 26(3):255-66. °Department of Biomedical Science and Environmental Biology, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100 Shiquan 1st Rd., Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan. ANINV'V' t_41)4NV%fniAtA.1)4V*. 2)Department of Oral Hygiene, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100 Shiquan 1st Rd., Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan. ANINV'V' EuriRit_V*. 3) Institute of Biodiversity, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Rd., Tainan 70101, Taiwan. ' 70101tAir'l--,4M19R. ° 4) Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Received March 2011, Accepted June 2011. 2011*3)1')A, 2011*6)1-AA 256 Chen et al.Dominance rank and foraging behavior of birds in a park MA-tACR-allUtl*fit,-4Hi-A 1,4) 1.4 23) VI] -1);AIWA" 2431 ")-ni120096/A 19)A rnlYfAtiglitEXT.LOITJ--AMMMffiEMIT11. fflRAMIU*WRWARgEDAMM4MaffiRAANI-411U.MfflfflTiR pgra-WAnDavidinirmArfu4,0-t-ofs A-A-Mj-Py± vrgavcolumba tiviamWjApa (Streptopeliachinensis)JEAUFFAftirTZPAiKV.E,IVAII/jat(Passer montanus)trini]Mh MMAM°ElltbAtAMAE01,0M19MMR4MMMAMAUNOMIMMMOM°fiU AWARRTR,MR4MMM**MM14,1MR/PVAMAMAUNAAnthRTEZMU° (Acridotheres javanicus)RnEU(Pycnonotus sinensis)n+ 1444 2.11..MIntAntr412A At2J--*CCMMITEAU 24TPAIOTTAMIMA4114-PAIVJ rgaig ELd/J\MLit'ffiP.AfEMPFIAO-fi MITJRiratrak:TDavidiA2. MAT7 /J\ J-',1.1tYMNPEM.firi`Jf4MaliMig ° 3J p :Davidaf4MaliMI r I AMJ-Py Ait ° IAM'?, 5q7C/fVi10--44 Ewa2011AtiffriAfrOMIR2f4MaliMRAA-4144i1Py ° tiR t441.3M26(3):255-66 INTRODUCTION In addition to intraspecific competition, body size to be the major factor determining competition for resources among different dominance rank among birds, exceptions do animal species may also result in dominance occur. For example, the larger Black-backed hierarchies (Fisler 1977, Millikan et al. 1985, Woodpeckers (Pico ides arcticus) often stop Wallace and Temple 1987). Larger species foraging and move away when the smaller usually have a higher dominance rank and ac- Hairy Woodpeckers (P. villosus) approach cess resources earlier or take more food than within 10 m (Villard and Beninger 1993). Ap- smaller species (Hogstad 1989, Jablonski and parently, other factors such as aggressiveness Lee 1999, French and Smith 2005). Once or group size may also affect the dominance dominant species appear, they often occupy a rank (Burger and Gochfeld 1984, Chapman better position and make subordinate species and Kramer 1996, Basset 1997, Sandlin 2000, shift to other foraging sites (Alatalo 1981, Creel 2001). For example, the Grey-headed Alatalo and Moreno 1987, Jablonski and Lee Junco (Junco caniceps) won social encoun- 2002). Morse (1980, 1989) stated that an un- ters at a higher rate in larger groups (Millikan even partitioning of resources usually stems et al. 1985). On the other hand, gender, age, from different social dominance ranks among experience, and residence time at feeding birds. sites were proven to influence the dominance Although Basset (1995) considered rank among conspecific individuals (Davies Taiwan J For Sci 26(3): 255-66, 2011 257 1992, Stanback 1994, Emlem 1997, Martin et been feeding birds in the park every day for al. 1997, Pusey and Packer 1997). a long period of time, hundreds of birds, in- The study of urban ecosystems has be- cluding feral pigeons, Spotted-necked Doves, come quite popular in recent decades (Savard Tree Sparrows, etc, are attracted to the feed- et al. 2000, Fontana et al. 2011). Although ur- ing site almost every day. ban parks, especially forest parks, are consid- The food area was defined as the area of ered habitat islands in an ocean of buildings, ground covered by food, and it was circular they are actually important habitats for bird with a radius of about 1 m. Bread crumbs and communities living in big cities (Fernandez- bean sprouts were provided in the food area Juricic and Jokimaki 2001, Sandstrom et al. twice a day, once in the morning and once 2006). Furthermore, people may put out food in the afternoon. The quantity of food was at feeding areas of parks to provide birds with recorded whenever we began an observa- additional food (Orams 2002). According tion. The quantity of food in the food area to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (1989), was divided into 3 levels: 1) abundant, when about 82 million Americans use many dif- food had just been spread in the food area to ferent ways to feed birds, and Cowie and about 75% of food remaining; 2) medium, the Hinsley (1988) found that 75% of households remaining food covering > 50% of the food put out food during winter in Cardiff, UK. In area, and soil was clearly exposed in certain contrast, people in Taiwan seldom feed wild areas; 3) little, < 50% of the food area was birds. A feeding site in a park in Kaohsiung covered by food, and dark brown soil was ex- City provided us the opportunity to study posed in most parts of the circle. interspecific competition among some park bird species. Among them, the Tree Spar- Field methods row (Passer montanus), Chinese Bulbul From 25 June to 30 September 2009, (Pycnonotus sinensis), Spotted-necked Dove we recorded social interactions and foraging (Streptopelia chinensis), feral pigeon (Colum- behaviors of these bird species at the feeding ba livia), Grey Treepie (Dendrocitta formo- site. Concerning social interactions, we made sae), and White-vented Myna (Acridotheres note of the time, species involved, aggressive javanicus) are common bird species in city behavior, and outcome of the interaction. We parks of Kaohsiung (Chen et al. 2005) and scored a 'win' for birds that initiated aggres- frequently occur at the feeding site examined sive behavior, and a 'loss' for the bird that in this study. We investigated the dominance displayed submissive behavior. Aggressive rank and interference competition in foraging behavior included attacking others with the among these 6 bird species. beak, chasing others, and threat displays with posture or sound. Birds which displayed MATERIALS AND METHODS submissive behavior usually retreated or yielded to the bird that initiated the aggres- Study area sive behavior. For foraging behaviors, we The study site is located within the San- recorded foraging techniques applied by each Min Park (18.4 ha, 22°64'N, 120°31'E) in bird species at the feeding site. Foraging tech- Kaohsiung City, southern Taiwan. It is a well- niques included foraging within the food area, maintained park, full of trees and meadows. carrying food out of the food area, carrying Owing to an enthusiastic resident who has food up to trees, or snatching food from other 258 Chen et al.Dominance rank and foraging behavior of birds in a park individuals within the food area. defeated by species i (David 1987, de Vries To estimate the abundance of each bird 1998). Because our data had many interacting species at the feeding site, we used scan sam- pairs with reversals, application of David's pling at 10-min intervals (Martin and Bateson score was considered appropriate (Gammell 1993) to count the number of each species et al. 2003, Bang et al. 2010). We then used in the feeding site. If birds had flown away the Spearman rank correlation coefficient to because of a disturbance before the scanning test if the dominance index was positively time, we waited for another 10 min to repeat correlated with the body size of each bird the scanning. In between the sampling points, species (SAS 1999). Body size indices were we recorded social interactions among species derived from PRIN1 through a principal com- and the foraging behaviors of each species. ponent analysis (PCA), that integrated body We made additional observations to length and weight of the 6 bird species (Table examine the distribution of Tree Sparrows 2; SAS 1999), because body length and mass inside and outside the food area and the abun- may both play a role in dominance displays dances of large-sized bird species in the food (Robinson-Wolrath and Owens 2003).
Recommended publications
  • Thailand Highlights 14Th to 26Th November 2019 (13 Days)
    Thailand Highlights 14th to 26th November 2019 (13 days) Trip Report Siamese Fireback by Forrest Rowland Trip report compiled by Tour Leader: Forrest Rowland Trip Report – RBL Thailand - Highlights 2019 2 Tour Summary Thailand has been known as a top tourist destination for quite some time. Foreigners and Ex-pats flock there for the beautiful scenery, great infrastructure, and delicious cuisine among other cultural aspects. For birders, it has recently caught up to big names like Borneo and Malaysia, in terms of respect for the avian delights it holds for visitors. Our twelve-day Highlights Tour to Thailand set out to sample a bit of the best of every major habitat type in the country, with a slight focus on the lush montane forests that hold most of the country’s specialty bird species. The tour began in Bangkok, a bustling metropolis of winding narrow roads, flyovers, towering apartment buildings, and seemingly endless people. Despite the density and throng of humanity, many of the participants on the tour were able to enjoy a Crested Goshawk flight by Forrest Rowland lovely day’s visit to the Grand Palace and historic center of Bangkok, including a fun boat ride passing by several temples. A few early arrivals also had time to bird some of the urban park settings, even picking up a species or two we did not see on the Main Tour. For most, the tour began in earnest on November 15th, with our day tour of the salt pans, mudflats, wetlands, and mangroves of the famed Pak Thale Shore bird Project, and Laem Phak Bia mangroves.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornithological Records from Ha Giang Province, North-East Vietnam, During March–June 2000
    FORKTAIL 19 (2003): 21-30 Ornithological records from Ha Giang province, north-east Vietnam, during March–June 2000 C. J. VOGEL, P. R. SWEET, LE MANH HUNG and M. M. HURLEY Ornithological field surveys were undertaken at three montane forest sites in Ha Giang province, north-east Vietnam, between March and June 2000. A total of 146 bird species were recorded, including Beautiful Nuthatch Sitta formosa (Vulnerable), Short-tailed Scimitar Babbler Jabouillea danjoui (Near Threatened), the first record for Vietnam of Yellow-vented Warbler Phylloscopus cantator, and 16 additional species previously unrecorded in East Tonkin. The results indicate that the montane regions of northern Vietnam east of the Red River remain under-surveyed. INTRODUCTION richness and levels of human disturbance in montane areas of Ha Giang province (Hurley 2002, Lunde et al. This paper presents bird records based on sight submitted, Bain and Nguyen Quang Truong in prep.). observations and specimens collected during field The mountains of Ha Giang include the highest peak surveys at three montane localities in Ha Giang province, in Vietnam east of the Red River: Mount Tay Con Linh north-east Vietnam during March–June 2000. This (2,616 m). Although a number of bird collections have survey was part of a multi-taxa inventory conducted been made in Tonkin (e.g. Kuroda 1917, Delacour 1928, jointly by the Center for Biodiversity and Conservation 1930, Kinnear 1929, Bangs and Van Tyne 1931, at the American Museum of Natural History, New York Dickinson 1970, Eames and Ericson 1996), the (CBC-AMNH) and the Institute for Ecology and mountains along East Tonkin’s border with China have Biological Resources, Hanoi (IEBR) to ascertain species been relatively neglected compared with those to the Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Bangladesh 2015
    Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary Chief National Technical Expert Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Technical Coordinator Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature Bangladesh Country Office 2015 i The designation of geographical entitles in this book and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature concerning the legal status of any country, territory, administration, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The biodiversity database and views expressed in this publication are not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Bangladesh Forest Department and The World Bank. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from The World Bank through Bangladesh Forest Department to implement the subproject entitled ‘Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh’ under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection (SRCWP)’ Project. Published by: IUCN Bangladesh Country Office Copyright: © 2015 Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Citation: Of this volume IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+122. ISBN: 978-984-34-0733-7 Publication Assistant: Sheikh Asaduzzaman Design and Printed by: Progressive Printers Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird List of Kaeng Kracharn National Park No
    Bird List of Kaeng Kracharn National Park No. Species Date 1 Racket-tailed Treepie Crypsirina temia 2 Ratchet-tailed Treepie Temnurus temnurus 3 Grey Treepie Dendrocitta formosae 4 Common Green Magpie Cissa chinensis 5 Crested Jay Platylophus galericulatus 6 Black Drongo Dicrurus macrocercus 7 Ashy Drongo Dicrurus leucophaeus 8 Crown-billed Drongo Dicrurus annectans 9 Bronzed Drongo Dicrurus aeneus 10 Lesser Racket-Tailed Drongo Dicrurus remifer 11 Spangled Drongo Dicrurus hottentottus 12 Greater Racket-Tailed Drongo Dicrurus paradiseus 13 White-browned Piculet Sasia ochracea 14 Bamboo Woodpecker Gencinulus viridis 15 Grey-capped Pygmy Woodpecker Dendrocopos canicapillus 16 Grey-And-Buff Woodpecker Hemicircus concretus 17 Lesser Yellownape Picus chlorolophus 18 Greater Yellownape Picus jlavinucha 19 Streak-breasted Woodpecker Picus viridanus 20 Laced Woodpecker Picus vittatus 21 Streak-throated Woodpecker Picus xanthopygaeus 22 Common Flameback Dinpium javanense 23 Greater Flameback Chrysocolaptes lucidus 24 Rufous Woodpecker Celeus brachyurus 25 Great Slaty Woodpecker Mulleripicus pulverulentus 26 Grey-headed Woodpecker Picus canus 27 Checker-throated Woodpecker Picus mentalis 28 Great Barbet Megalaima virens 29 Lineated Barbet Megalaima lineata 30 Blue-eared Barbet Megalaima australis 31 Coppersmith Barbet Megalaima heamacephala 32 Green-eared Barbet Megalaima faiostricta No. Species Date 33 Golden-throated Barbet Megalaima franklinii 34 Oriental Pied Hornbill Anthracoceros albirostris 35 Brown Hornbill Anorrhinus tickilli 36 Great
    [Show full text]
  • Godavari Birds Godavari Birds
    Godavari Birds Godavari Birds i Godavari Birds From Godavari to Phulchowki peak, there are an estimated 270 bird species with 17 listed as endangered. Godavari proper has 100 species recorded. It is impossible to photograph all of them. A reference list is provided at the end of the booklet so that you can continue to locate birds that we have not been able to photograph. This fun booklet presents a few of the more common and eye catching birds that hopefully will catch your eye too. Bird watching provides valuable information. Consistent records give indications of habitat loss, changes in climate, migration patterns and new or missing previous records. Years of data have been collected across Nepal to give a picture of birds in place and time. The oldest Nepal record is from 1793 when it was more common to catch and skin birds for museum collections. Compiled by Karen Conniff, Ron Hess and Erling Valdemar Holmgren ii Godavari Birds Godavari Birds This basic guide is organized by family and sub-family groupings. The purpose is to make it easier to identify the birds sighted at the ICIMOD Knowledge Park and surrounding areas in Godavari. There are several bird watching tours and groups of regular bird watchers to join with and improve your knowledge of local birds. If you have comments, want to add a new identification record or found errors in this booklet please contact: Karen Conniff – [email protected] iii Godavari Birds Blue-throated Barbet (Ron Hess) iv Godavari Birds Family RHess Phasianidae or Kalij Pheasant (female) Partridges
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern China
    The magnificent Reeves's Pheasant was one of the many specialties seen on this tour (Brendan Ryan). EASTERN CHINA 3 – 27 MAY 2017 LEADER: HANNU JÄNNES Birdquest’s Eastern China tour, an epic 25 day journey across much of eastern China, focusses on an array of rare Chinese endemics and migrants, and this year’s tour once again proved a great success. The focus of the first part of the tour is to achieve good views of rarities like Spoon-billed Sandpiper, the critically endangered Blue-crowned (Courtois’s) Laughingthrush, the superb Cabot’s Tragopan and Elliot’s Pheasant and the ultra-rare Chinese Crested Tern. This was successfully achieved alongside a plethora of other much sought after species including White-faced Plover, Great Knot, stunning Saunders’s Gulls, Reed Parrotbill, eastern migrants, including Pechora Pipit, Japanese Robin, Japanese Paradise, Yellow-rumped, Narcissus and Mugimaki Flycatchers, and forest species like Brown-chested Jungle Flycatcher, White-necklaced Partridge, Silver Pheasant, Buffy and Moustached Laughingthrushes, Short-tailed Parrotbill, Fork-tailed Sunbird and the delightful Pied Falconet. Quite a haul! 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Eastern China 2017 www.birdquest-tours.com Crested Ibis at Dongzhai Nature Reserve (Brendan Ryan). The second part of the tour, the ‘Northeast Extension’, visited a series of sites for various other Chinese specialities. Beginning in Wuhan, we bagged the amazing Reeves’s Pheasant and Crested Ibis, as well as stunners that included Fairy Pitta and Chestnut-winged Cuckoo. We then moved on to Jiaocheng for the fabulous Brown Eared Pheasants before flying on to Beijing, where the mountains of the nearby Hebei province yielded the endemic Chinese Beautiful Rosefinch, Chinese Nuthatch, Green-backed and Zappey’s Flycatchers and the rare Grey-sided Thrush.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ornithological Importance of Thrumshingla National Park, Bhutan
    FORKTAIL 16 (2000): 147-162 The ornithological importance of Thrumshingla National Park, Bhutan CAROL INSKIPP, TIM INSKIPP and SHERUB Thrumshingla National Park is one of four national parks in Bhutan and was gazetted in 1998 to ensure the conservation of biodiversity in the central belt of the country. Two bird surveys have been carried out in the park: in April and May 1998 and in January 2000. Based on these surveys and records from other sources, a list of 345 bird species has been compiled for the park up to the end of May 2000. This includes three globally threatened species, 15 of Bhutan’s near-threatened species and eight of the country’s 11 restricted range species. Warm broadleaved forest was found to be the most valuable for bird species in both the breeding season and in winter, followed by cool broadleaved forest. Fir and hemlock, especially those with an understorey of rhododendron and bamboo, were the richest forests for birds at higher altitudes. INTRODUCTION highway runs through approximately the middle of the park from Bumthang, via Ura, Sengor, Namling, Bhutan lies in the eastern Himalayas, one of the world’s Yongkhala to Lingmethang. The park’s altitudinal range biodiversity ‘hotspots’ and identified as an Endemic Bird extends from 1,400 m below Saleng in the core area Area by BirdLife International (Stattersfield et al. 1998). and 700 m at Lingmethang in the buffer zone to over The country has an extensive protected area system, 6,000 m at Thrumshingla Peak. encompassing 26% of its land area and covering the Like most of Bhutan, Thrumshingla National Park full range of the nation’s major ecosystem types.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment & Management Plan
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized E1050 v3 rev m Theun 2 Hydroelectric Project Na & Management Plan Environmental Assessment March 2005 annexes List of Annexes List of Annexes Annex A: References ........................................................................................A1-6 Annex B: Contributors to the EAMP ....................................................................B1-2 Annex C: Project Key Technical Data ..................................................................C1-4 Annex D: Technical Drawings of Project Infrastructure ......................................D1-18 Annex E: Hydrological Data ............................................................................. E1-10 Annex F: Simulated Dam Operations ................................................................ F1-10 Annex G: Water Quality Modelling Assumptions and Results ................................G1-4 Annex H: Forest & Vegetation Types ..................................................................H1-4 Annex I: Mammal & Bird Species of the NNT Area .............................................I1-20 Annex J: Fish Species & Migration ..................................................................... J1-8 Annex K: Head Construction Contractor’s Environmental Requirements .............. K1-18 Annex L: Pest Management Plan ..................................................................... L1-18 Annex M: Public Consultation and Disclosure Events .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • SE China and Tibet (Qinghai) Custom Tour: 31 May – 16 June 2013
    SE China and Tibet (Qinghai) Custom Tour: 31 May – 16 June 2013 Hard to think of a better reason to visit SE China than the immaculate cream-and-golden polka- dot spotted Cabot’s Tragopan, a gorgeous serious non-disappointment of a bird. www.tropicalbirding.com The Bar-headed Goose is a spectacular waterfowl that epitomizes the Tibetan plateau. It migrates at up to 27,000 ft over the giant Asian mountains to winter on the plains of the Indian sub-continent. Tour Leader: Keith Barnes All photos taken on this tour Introduction: SE and Central China are spectacular. Both visually stunning and spiritually rich, and it is home to many scarce, seldom-seen and spectacular looking birds. With our new base in Taiwan, little custom tour junkets like this one to some of the more seldom reached and remote parts of this vast land are becoming more popular, and this trip was planned with the following main objectives in mind: (1) see the monotypic family Pink-tailed Bunting, (2) enjoy the riches of SE China in mid-summer and see as many of the endemics of that region including its slew of incredible pheasants and the summering specialties. We achieved both of these aims, including incredible views of all the endemic phasianidae that we attempted, and we also enjoyed the stunning scenery and culture that is on offer in Qinghai’s Tibet. Other major highlights on the Tibetan plateau included stellar views of breeding Pink-tailed Bunting (of the monotypic Chinese Tibetan-endemic family Urocynchramidae), great looks at Przevalski’s and Daurian Partridges, good views of the scarce Ala Shan Redstart, breeding Black-necked Crane, and a slew of wonderful waterbirds including many great looks at the iconic Bar-headed Goose and a hoarde of www.tropicalbirding.com snowfinches.
    [Show full text]
  • Entirely Electronic Journal Published Annually by the Institute for Bird Populations
    BIRD POPULATIONS A journal of global avian demography and biogeography Volume 13 2014 Published annually by The Institute for Bird Populations BIRD POPULATIONS A journal of global avian demography and biogeography Published by The Institute for Bird Populations Editor: DAVID G. AINLEY, H.T. Harvey & Associates, 983 University Avenue, Bldg D, Los Gatos, CA 95032; 415-272-9499; [email protected] Managing Editor: DAVID F. DESANTE, The Institute for Bird Populations, P.O. Box 1346, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956-1346; 415-663-2052; 415-663-9482 fax; [email protected] Spanish Translation of Abstracts: BORJA MILA, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, Madrid 28006, Spain; [email protected] Layout and Typesetting: PRISCILLA YOCOM, 5018 Albridal Way, San Ramon, CA 94582 THE INSTITUTE FOR BIRD POPULATIONS A tax-exempt California nonprofit corporation established in 1989 and dedicated to fostering a global approach to research and the dissemination of information on changes in bird populations. President: DAVID F. DESANTE , P.O. Box 1346, Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 Secretary-Treasurer: STEPHEN M. ALLAN, 962 Mistletoe Loop N, Keizer, OR 97303 Directors: CORDELL GREEN, IVAN SAMUELS, RODNEY B. SIEGEL, and DAN TOMPKINS All persons interested in birds are invited to join The Institute for Bird Populations. Individual membership dues are $35 per year. Institutional memberships are $50 per year; student and senior memberships are $15 per year. Please send check or money order (in U.S. dollars) payable to The Institute for Bird Populations, along with complete name, address, and email address to: The Institute for Bird Populations, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Askot Landscape, Uttarakhand Phase
    Evaluation of Birds as Potential Indicator Species for Long Term Monitoring: Askot Landscape, Uttarakhand Phase – 1 Report BCRLIP Coordinator Sh. V. K. Uniyal Bird Component Investigator Sh. R. Suresh Kumar Project Assistant Ankita Bhattacharya Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change Uttarakhand Forest Department World Bank Wildlife Instituute of India January, 2015 Further Contact: BCRLIP Coordinator Sh. V. K. Uniyal Department of Protected Area Network, WL Management and Conservation Education Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani Dehradun, India 248 001 Tell: 00 91 135 2646207 Fax: 00 91 135 2640117 E-mail; [email protected] Bird Component Investigator Sh. R Suresh Kumar Department of Endangered Species Management Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani Dehradun, India 248 001 Tell: 00 91 135 2646161 Fax: 00 91 135 2640117 E-mail; [email protected] Photo Credits: Front and Back Cover Photographs: Pankaj Kumar, Ankita Bhattacharya, Soni Bisht and Suresh Kumar Rana Main report Photographs: Suresh Kumar Rana and World Pheasant Asssociation (WPA) Citation: Bhattacharya, A., Kumar, R. S. and Uniyal, V. K. (2015): Evaluation of Birds as Potential Indicator Species for Long Term Monitoring: Askot landscape, Uttarakhand, Phase 1 – Report, Wildlife Institute of India. Pp 29. Contents List of Tables ii List of Figures iii Acknowledgements iv 1 Background 1 2 Study area 2 3 Methods 4 4 Findings of the study 6 5 Future Plans 24 6 References 24 Annexure I: Checklist of birds of Askot Landscape with 25 reports of birds seen during this study List of Tables Table No. Table Name Page No. 1 a. List of villages surveyed along Gori river basin in Askot 6 Landscape 1 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Ecosystems of Myanmar
    Threatened ecosystems of Myanmar An IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Assessment Nicholas J. Murray, David A. Keith, Robert Tizard, Adam Duncan, Win Thuya Htut, Nyan Hlaing, Aung Htat Oo, Kyaw Zay Ya and Hedley Grantham 2020 | Version 1.0 Threatened Ecosystems of Myanmar. An IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Assessment. Version 1.0. Murray, N.J., Keith, D.A., Tizard, R., Duncan, A., Htut, W.T., Hlaing, N., Oo, A.H., Ya, K.Z., Grantham, H. License This document is an open access publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non- commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors: Nicholas J. Murray University of New South Wales and James Cook University, Australia David A. Keith University of New South Wales, Australia Robert Tizard Wildlife Conservation Society, Myanmar Adam Duncan Wildlife Conservation Society, Canada Nyan Hlaing Wildlife Conservation Society, Myanmar Win Thuya Htut Wildlife Conservation Society, Myanmar Aung Htat Oo Wildlife Conservation Society, Myanmar Kyaw Zay Ya Wildlife Conservation Society, Myanmar Hedley Grantham Wildlife Conservation Society, Australia Citation: Murray, N.J., Keith, D.A., Tizard, R., Duncan, A., Htut, W.T., Hlaing, N., Oo, A.H., Ya, K.Z., Grantham, H. (2020) Threatened Ecosystems of Myanmar. An IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Assessment. Version 1.0. Wildlife Conservation Society. ISBN: 978-0-9903852-5-7 DOI 10.19121/2019.Report.37457 ISBN 978-0-9903852-5-7 Cover photos: © Nicholas J. Murray, Hedley Grantham, Robert Tizard Numerous experts from around the world participated in the development of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems of Myanmar. The complete list of contributors is located in Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]