DOCSLIB.ORG

Systema Naturae 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Taxonomicon Systema Naturae 2000 Classification of Family Gracillariidae (moths) down to Genus Compiled by Drs. S.J. Brands Universal Taxonomic Services 8 Apr 2017 Systema Naturae 2000 - Family Gracillariidae - [Kingdom Animalia: Phylum Arthropoda: Class Insecta: Order Lepidoptera - moths] Family Gracillariidae* Stainton, 1854 - leafminer moths 01 Genus Amblyptila Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 02 Genus Apistoneura Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 03 Genus Apophthisis Braun, 1915, incertae sedis 04 Genus Aspilapteryx Spuler, 1910, incertae sedis 05 Genus Callicercops Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 06 Genus Calybites Hübner, 1822, incertae sedis 07 Genus Chilocampyla Busck, 1900, incertae sedis 08 Genus Conopobathra Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 09 Genus Conopomorpha Meyrick, 1885, incertae sedis 10 Genus Conopomorphina Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 11 Genus Corethrovalva Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 12 Genus Corythoxestis Meyrick, 1921, incertae sedis 13 Genus Cryptolectica Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 14 Genus Cupedia Klimesch & Kumata, 1973, incertae sedis 15 Genus Cuphodes Meyrick, 1897, incertae sedis 16 Genus Cyphosticha Meyrick, 1907, incertae sedis 17 Genus Dendrorycter Kumata, 1978, incertae sedis 18 Genus Dialectica Walsingham, 1897, incertae sedis 19 Genus Diphtheroptila Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 20 Genus Dysectopa Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 21 Genus Ectropina Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 22 Genus Epicnistis Meyrick, 1906, incertae sedis 23 Genus Eucalybites Kumata, 1982, incertae sedis 24 Genus Eurytyla Meyrick, 1893, incertae sedis 25 Genus Gracillariites Kozlov, 1987, incertae sedis 26 Genus Graphiocephala Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 27 Genus Guttigera Diakonoff, 1955, incertae sedis 28 Genus Hyloconis Kumata, 1963, incertae sedis 29 Genus Hypectopa Diakonoff, 1955, incertae sedis 30 Genus Lamprolectica Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 31 Genus Leucocercops Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 32 Genus Leucospilapteryx Spuler, 1910, incertae sedis 33 Genus Liocrobyla Meyrick, 1916, incertae sedis 34 Genus Marmara Clemens, 1863, incertae sedis 35 Genus Metacercops Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 36 Genus Neolithocolletis Kumata, 1963, incertae sedis 37 Genus Oligoneurina Vari, 1961, incertae sedis 38 Genus Ornixola Kuznetsov, 1979, incertae sedis 39 Genus Pareclectis Meyrick, 1937, incertae sedis 40 Genus Penica Walsingham, 1914, incertae sedis 41 Genus Pleiomorpha Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 42 Genus Pogonocephala Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 43 Genus Polydema Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 44 Genus Polysoma Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 45 Genus Porphyrosela Braun, 1908, incertae sedis 46 Genus Protolithocolletis Braun, 1929, incertae sedis 47 Genus Sauterina Kuznetsov, 1979, incertae sedis 48 Genus Semnocera Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 49 Genus Spanioptila Walsingham, 1897, incertae sedis 50 Genus Spulerina Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 51 Genus Systoloneura Vári, 1961, incertae sedis 52 Genus Timodora Meyrick, 1886, incertae sedis 53 Subfamily Gracillariinae* 01 Genus Acrocercops Wallengren, 1881 02 Genus Aristaea Meyrick, 1907 03 Genus Callisto Stephens, 1834 04 Genus Caloptilia Hübner, 1825 05 Genus Epicephala Meyrick, 1880 06 Genus Micrurapteryx Spuler, 1910 07 Genus Neurobathra Ely, 1918 08 Genus Neurolipa Ely, 1918 09 Genus Neurostrota Ely, 1918 10 Genus Parectopa Clemens, 1860 11 Genus Parornix Spuler, 1910 12 Genus Philodoria Walsingham, 1907 13 Genus Stomphastis Meyrick, 1912 14 Genus Synnympha Meyrick, 1915 54 Subfamily Lithocolletinae 1 Genus Cameraria Chapman, 1902 2 Genus Chrysaster Kumata, 1961 - 1 - © Universal Taxonomic Services, Zwaag, The Netherlands Systema Naturae 2000 - Family Gracillariidae - 3 Genus Cremastobombycia Braun, 1908 4 Genus Leucanthiza Clemens, 1859 5 Genus Phyllonorycter Hübner, 1822 55 Subfamily Phyllocnistinae 1 Genus Cryphiomystis Meyrick, 1922 2 Genus Metriochroa Busck, 1900 3 Genus Phyllocnistis* Zeller, 1848 Citation: Brands, S.J. (ed.), 2017. Classification of Family Gracillariidae (moths) down to Genus. In Systema Naturae 2000. The Taxonomicon. Universal Taxonomic Services, Zwaag, The Netherlands, 8 Apr 2017. <http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/TaxonTree.aspx?src=0&id=29463> Sources Beccaloni, G., Scoble, M., Kitching, I., Simonsen, T., Robinson, G., Pitkin, B., Hine, A. & Lyal, C. 2005. The Global Lepidoptera Names Index. Natural History Museum, London, Feb 2005. Kristensen, N.P., Scoble, M.J. & Karsholt, O. 2007. Lepidoptera phylogeny and systematics: the state of inventorying moth and butterfly diversity. In Z.-Q. Zhang & W.A. Shear (eds.), Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa 1668: 699-747. Poole, R.W. & Gentili, P. (comps.) 1996. Volume 3: Diptera, Lepidoptera, Siphonaptera. Nomina Insecta Nearctica: A Check List of the Insects of North America. Entomological Information Services, Rockville, Maryland: 1143 pp.. van Nieukerken, E.J., Kaila, L., Kitching, I.J., Kristensen, N.P., Lees, D.C., Minet, J., Mitter, C., Mutanen, M., Regier, J.C., Simonsen, T.J., Wahlberg, N., Yen, S.-H., Zahiri, R., Adamski, D., Baixeras, J., Bartsch, D., Bengtsson, B.Å., Brown, J.W., Bucheli, S.R., Davis, D.R., De Prins, J., De Prins, W., Epstein, M.E., Gentili-Poole, P., Gielis, C., Hättenschwiler, P., Hausmann, A., Holloway, J.D., Kallies, A., Karsholt, O., Kawahara, A.Y., Koster, J.C., Kozlov, M.V., Lafontaine, J.D., Lamas, G. et al. 2011. Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In Z.-Q. Zhang (ed.), Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148, 23 Dec 2011: 212-221. DISCLAIMER: This document is not published for nomenclatural purposes within the meaning of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). - 2 - © Universal Taxonomic Services, Zwaag, The Netherlands.
Recommended publications
  • 1 1 DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous

    1 1 DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous

    Page 1 of 57 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France. 12 3Institut de Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, 13 CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, 75005 Paris, France. 14 4 Landesmuseum für Kärnten, Abteilung Zoologie, Museumgasse 2, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria 15 5 Department of Entomology, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar 16 6 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON 17 N1G2W1, Canada 18 7Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Genome Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by UNIV GUELPH on 10/03/18 19 Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), 1919 Route de Mende, F-34293 20 Montpellier, France. 21 8Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD, UK. 22 23 24 Email for correspondence: [email protected] For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from final official version of record. 1 Page 2 of 57 25 26 Abstract 27 Madagascar is a prime evolutionary hotspot globally, but its unique biodiversity is under threat, 28 essentially from anthropogenic disturbance.
  • DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous Invasions of Micromoths in Madagascar

    DNA Barcodes Reveal Deeply Neglected Diversity and Numerous Invasions of Micromoths in Madagascar

    Genome DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in Madagascar Journal: Genome Manuscript ID gen-2018-0065.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 17-Jul-2018 Author: Complete List of Authors: Lopez-Vaamonde, Carlos; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), ; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte (IRBI), Sire, Lucas; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rasmussen,Draft Bruno; Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte Rougerie, Rodolphe; Institut Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Wieser, Christian; Landesmuseum für Kärnten Ahamadi, Allaoui; University of Antananarivo, Department Entomology Minet, Joël; Institut de Systematique Evolution Biodiversite deWaard, Jeremy; Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Decaëns, Thibaud; Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE UMR 5175, CNRS–Université de Montpellier–Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier–EPHE), , CEFE UMR 5175 CNRS Lees, David; Natural History Museum London Keyword: Africa, invasive alien species, Lepidoptera, Malaise trap, plant pests Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special 7th International Barcode of Life Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/genome-pubs Page 1 of 57 Genome 1 DNA barcodes reveal deeply neglected diversity and numerous invasions of micromoths in 2 Madagascar 3 4 5 Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde1,2, Lucas Sire2, Bruno Rasmussen2, Rodolphe Rougerie3, 6 Christian Wieser4, Allaoui Ahamadi Allaoui 5, Joël Minet3, Jeremy R. deWaard6, Thibaud 7 Decaëns7, David C. Lees8 8 9 1 INRA, UR633, Zoologie Forestière, F- 45075 Orléans, France. 10 2 Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l’Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS Université de Tours, UFR 11 Sciences et Techniques, Tours, France.
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5

    Lepidoptera of North America 5

    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
  • 2005 Project Abstract for the Period Ending June 30, 2008 PROJECT

    2005 Project Abstract for the Period Ending June 30, 2008 PROJECT

    2005 Project Abstract For the Period Ending June 30, 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Biological Control of European Buckthorn and Garlic Mustard PROJECT MANAGER: Luke Skinner AFFILIATION: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MAILING ADDRESS: 500 Lafayette Road Box 25 CITY/STATE/ZIP: St. Paul MN 55155 PHONE: 651-259-5140 FAX: 651-296-1811 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: (If applicable) FUNDING SOURCE: Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund LEGAL CITATION: [ML 2005, First Special Session, [Chap. 1], Art. 2, Sec.[11], Subd. 5 (h).] APPROPRIATION AMOUNT: $200,000 Overall Project Outcome and Results This project builds upon and continues work begun from a 2003 Trust Fund appropriation and has since received an additional 2007 Trust Fund appropriation to further continue and accelerate the work. Buckthorn and garlic mustard are invasive species of highest priority for development of long- term management solutions, such as biological control (bio-control). This research aimed to help determine 1) if there are suitable insects that can be used to reduce impacts caused by buckthorn and 2) to implement introduction of insects to control garlic mustard and assess their establishment and success. Buckthorn. Insects were collected and reared for carrying out host specificity testing. A total of 1,733 specimens (356 species) were collected from buckthorn infestations in this insect fauna survey. In total, 39 specialized arthopods were recorded from R. cathartica (common buckthorn) and F. alnus (glossy buckthorn) in Europe. The reassessment of the potential for biological control of R. cathartica and F. alnus was conducted based on work done in Europe from 2002-2007 on potential biological control agents.
  • Lepidoptera of Albany Hill, Alameda Co., California

    Lepidoptera of Albany Hill, Alameda Co., California

    LEPIDOPTERA OF ALBANY HILL, ALAMEDA CO., CALIFORNIA Jerry A. Powell Essig Museum of Entomology University of California, Berkeley and Robert L. Langston Kensington, CA November 1999; edited 2009 The following list summarizes observations of Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) at Albany Hill, Alameda Co., California, during 1995-1999. Data originate from about 75 daytime and crepuscular visits of 0.5 to 3.5 hrs, in all months of the year. All of the butterfly species and some of the moths were recorded by RLL, most of the moth species and their larval host plants by JAP. A total of 145 species is recorded (30 butterflies, 115 moths), a modest number considering the extent and diversity of the flora. However, many of the potential larval host plants may be present in too small patches to support populations of larger moths or butterflies. Nonetheless, we were surprised that colonies of some of the species survive in a small area that has been surrounded by urban development for many decades, including some rare ones in the East Bay region, as annotated below. Moreover, the inventory is incomplete. A more comprehensive census would be accomplished by trapping moths attracted to ultraviolet lights. In a habitat of this size, however, such survey would attract an unknown proportion of species from surrounding areas. Larval collections are indicated by date-based JAP lot numbers (e.g. 95C37 = 1995, March, 37th collection). Larval foods of most of the other species are documented in other populations. Host plants are recorded at Albany Hill for 75 species (65% of the moths, 52% of the total); the rest were observed as adults only.
  • A New Leaf-Mining Moth from New Zealand, Sabulopteryx Botanica Sp

    A New Leaf-Mining Moth from New Zealand, Sabulopteryx Botanica Sp

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 865: 39–65A new (2019) leaf-mining moth from New Zealand, Sabulopteryx botanica sp. nov. 39 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.865.34265 MONOGRAPH http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A new leaf-mining moth from New Zealand, Sabulopteryx botanica sp. nov. (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae, Gracillariinae), feeding on the rare endemic shrub Teucrium parvifolium (Lamiaceae), with a revised checklist of New Zealand Gracillariidae Robert J.B. Hoare1, Brian H. Patrick2, Thomas R. Buckley1,3 1 New Zealand Arthropod Collection (NZAC), Manaaki Whenua–Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auc- kland, New Zealand 2 Wildlands Consultants Ltd, PO Box 9276, Tower Junction, Christchurch 8149, New Ze- aland 3 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand Corresponding author: Robert J.B. Hoare ([email protected]) Academic editor: E. van Nieukerken | Received 4 March 2019 | Accepted 3 May 2019 | Published 22 Jul 2019 http://zoobank.org/C1E51F7F-B5DF-4808-9C80-73A10D5746CD Citation: Hoare RJB, Patrick BH, Buckley TR (2019) A new leaf-mining moth from New Zealand, Sabulopteryx botanica sp. nov. (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae, Gracillariinae), feeding on the rare endemic shrub Teucrium parvifolium (Lamiaceae), with a revised checklist of New Zealand Gracillariidae. ZooKeys 965: 39–65. https://doi.org/10.3897/ zookeys.865.34265 Abstract Sabulopteryx botanica Hoare & Patrick, sp. nov. (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae, Gracillariinae) is described as a new species from New Zealand. It is regarded as endemic, and represents the first record of its genus from the southern hemisphere. Though diverging in some morphological features from previously de- scribed species, it is placed in genus Sabulopteryx Triberti, based on wing venation, abdominal characters, male and female genitalia and hostplant choice; this placement is supported by phylogenetic analysis based on the COI mitochondrial gene.
  • Nota Lepidopterologica

    Nota Lepidopterologica

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2010 Band/Volume: 33 Autor(en)/Author(s): Langmaid John R., Sattler Klaus, Lopez-Vaamonde Carlos Artikel/Article: Morphology and DNA barcodes show that Calybites hauderi does not occur in the British Isles (Gracillariidae) 191-197 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Notalepid. 33 (2): 191-197 191 Morphology and DNA barcodes show that Calybites hauderi does not occur in the British Isles (Gracillariidae) John R. Langmaid^ Klaus Sattler^ & Carlos Lopez-Vaamonde ^ 1 Wilverley, 1 Dorrita Close, Southsea, Hampshire, P04 ONY, U.K.; [email protected] 2 Department of Entomology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, U.K.; [email protected] 3 INRA, UR0633 Zoologie Forestière, F-45075 Orléans, France; [email protected] Abstract. Evidence is presented that all British specimens of Calybites hauderi (Rebel, 1906) are not that species but the first brood of bivoltine Caloptilia semifascia (Haworth, 1828). C. hauderi is removed from the British list and its occurrence in Belgium is questioned. C. semifascia is normally univoltine in the British Isles but bivoltine populations are now spreading in southern counties. Zusammenfassung. Der Nachweis wird erbracht, daß es sich bei allen britischen Calybites hauderi (Rebel, 1906) um die erste Generation der bivoltinen Caloptilia semifascia (Haworth, 1828) handelt. C. hauderi wird von der britischen Liste gestrichen und das Vorkommen in Belgien wird angezweifelt. C. semifascia ist auf den Britischen Inseln normalerweise univoUin doch breiten sich in den südlichen Grafschaften zunehmend bivoltine Populationen aus.
  • Prickly Acacia in Queensland Is Generally Accepted to Be Acacia Nilotica Subspecies Indica

    Prickly Acacia in Queensland Is Generally Accepted to Be Acacia Nilotica Subspecies Indica

    PRICKLY ACACIA Prickly acacia (Acacia nilotica) in Queensland PEST STATUS REVIEW SERIES - LAND PROTECTION BRANCH Edited by A.P. Mackey Assessment team: M. Barker W. Dorney P. James P. Jeffrey N. March J. Marohasy D. Panetta Acknowledgements This assessment draws heavily on reports by P. Jeffrey and M. Marker and valuable discussions with J. Carter. Cover and contents design: Grant Flockhart and Sonia Jordan Photographic credits: Natural Resources and Mines staff ISBN 0 7242 6969 X Published by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld. Information in this document may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, provided that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Land Protection Department of Natural Resources and Mines Locked Bag 40, Coorparoo Delivery Centre, Q, 4151 Contents 1.0 Summary.....................................................................................................1 2.0 Taxonomic Status. .....................................................................................2 3.0 History of Introduction and Spread. .........................................................3 4.0 Current and Predicted Potential Distribution. .........................................4 5.0 Estimates of Current and Potential Impact..............................................7 5.1 Impact on Primary Industry............................................................................ 7 5.2 Control Costs. ................................................................................................ 7 5.3 Environmental
  • Novel Aspects of Host Tree Resistance to Leafminers

    Novel Aspects of Host Tree Resistance to Leafminers

    NOVEL ASPECTS OF HOST TREE RESISTANCE TO LEAFMINERS STANLEY H. FAETH Department of Zoology Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287 U.S.A. INTRODUCTION At least 10,000 species of leafminers in four orders of insects (Lepidoptera, Diptera, Coleoptera, and Hymenoptera) are found worldwide. The common feature of all leafminers is that larvae feed within leaves for at least some larval stages. Larvae of facultative mining species feed internally but also externally as free-feeders, usually in later larval instars. Larvae of obligate mining species feed exclusively, and may also pupate, within leaves (Hering 1951, Powell 1980). Despite wide interspecific variation in life histories, leafminers are generally more closely associated with their feeding substrates than are free-feeding insects (Mattson et al. 1988). This "intimacy" (sensu Mattson et al. 1988) is the primary factor in directing their evolution and influencing population dynamics. For leafminers, as distinct from most freefeeding insects, selection of feeding substrates is determined solely by female oviposition choice, at least for obligate leafminers. Eggs may be cemented to the surface or embedded in the leaf, so adult females determine feeding sites not only among plants but also within leaves. For facultative leafminers, female oviposition choice determines larval feeding sites for at least some larval instars, and female choice generally plays a much larger role in larval feeding sites than it does for most external feeding insects. Confinement to a single leaf means that larvae cannot behaviorally escape deteriorating abiotic or biotic conditions associated with their substrates as agile insect larvae can, though a few species can mine more than one leaf by exiting the mine or mining through the petiole to adjacent leaves.
  • Die Gracillariinae Und Phyllocnistinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) Des Bundeslandes Salzburg, Österreich

    Die Gracillariinae Und Phyllocnistinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) Des Bundeslandes Salzburg, Österreich

    ©Österr. Ges. f. Entomofaunistik, Wien, download unter www.zobodat.at Beiträge zur Entomofaunistik 15: 1 –7 Wien, Dezember 2014 Die Gracillariinae und Phyllocnistinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) des Bundeslandes Salzburg, Österreich Michael KURZ* & Gernot EMBACHER** Abstract The Gracillariinae and Phyllocnistinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) of the federal state of Salzburg, Austria. – The revision of all specimens housed in the collection “Haus der Natur” and in several private collections, as well as available literature records of the family Gracillari- idae (excluding Lithocolletinae) of the federal territority of Salzburg revealed 33 species, 29 of which belong to Gracillariinae and four to Phyllocnistinae. Four species recorded by EMBACHER & al. (2011b) and also by HUEMER (2013) had to be eliminated from the catalogue because the speci- mens were misidentified or the records could not be verified. Two species are new for the fauna: Caloptilia populetorum (ZELLER, 1839) and Caloptilia fidella (REUTTI, 1853). Key words: Austria, Salzburg, Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae, Gracillariinae, Phyllocnistinae, faunis- tic records, collection “Haus der Natur”. Zusammenfassung Die Revision der in der Sammlung am „Haus der Natur“ und in mehreren Privatsammlungen auf- gefundenen Belege aus der Familie Gracillariidae (ausgenommen Lithocolletinae) und der dazu bekannten Literaturangaben ergab den Nachweis von 33 Arten, von denen 29 den Gracillariinae und 4 den Phyllocnistinae zuzuordnen sind. Vier in EMBACHER & al. (2011b) und auch in HUEMER (2013)
  • Systematics, Phylogeny and Biology of a New Genus of Lithocolletinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) Associated with Cistaceae

    Systematics, Phylogeny and Biology of a New Genus of Lithocolletinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) Associated with Cistaceae

    Zootaxa 3741 (2): 201–227 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3741.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E37C82A2-27DA-42DE-A298-838578F6B179 Systematics, phylogeny and biology of a new genus of Lithocolletinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) associated with Cistaceae JURATE DE PRINS1,4, DONALD R. DAVIS2, ELIANE DE CONINCK1, JAE-CHEON SOHN2 & PAOLO TRIBERTI3 1Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium 2National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, USA 3Museo di Storia Naturale, Verona, Italy 4Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The gracillariid genus Triberta gen. nov. (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae: Lithocolletinae Stainton, 1854) is described to ac- commodate two species formerly assigned to the genus Phyllonorycter Hübner, 1822: Triberta helianthemella (Herrich- Schäffer, 1861) comb. nov. and T. cistifoliella (Groschke, 1944) comb. nov. Triberta cistifoliella bona sp. is restored from synonymy based on morphological characters. The new genus is biologically associated with the plant family Cistaceae of the order Malvales and is endemic to the Palaearctics. Our molecular analysis of eleven nuclear genes failed to unambiguously place Triberta in the lithocolletine phylogeny, but revealed that this genus is distinct from either clade Phyllonorycter + Cremastobombycia and Cameraria. The distinctiveness of Triberta is also supported by inferred
  • Über Die Puppen Der Mittel- Und Westeuropäischen Gracillariinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

    Über Die Puppen Der Mittel- Und Westeuropäischen Gracillariinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

    Über die Puppen der mittel- und westeuropäischen Gracillariinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) J. Patoöka PATOCKA, J., 2001. ON THE PUPAE OF THE CENTRAL AND WESTERN EUROPEAN GRACILLARIINAE (LEPIDOPTERA: GRACILLARIIDAE). - ENT. BER., AMST. 61 (11): 157-164. Abstract: Pupae of seven species of Central and Western European Gracillariinae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) are de¬ scribed and illustrated. Diagnostic characteristics of the species are compared with those of similar taxa of this subfami¬ ly. Some biological data are added. Institut für Waldökologie der SAW, Stürova 2, 960 53 Zvolen, Republik Slowakei. Die vorliegende Arbeit stellt einen Nachtrag Raupen an Asteraceae spp. In Mitteleuropa zu den Arbeiten von Patocka (1992a, 1992b) mit einer, in Westeuropa mit keiner Art ver¬ und Patocka & Zach (1995) vor. Sie behandelt treten. die Puppen der sieben von dem Autor bisher Bemerkung: Bei der Bestimmung dieser nicht untersuchten Arten der mittel- und Gattung mit Hilfe der Gattungstabelle der westeuropäischen Gracillariinae. Eine Cha¬ Gracillariidae in Patocka (1992 a) kommt man rakteristik der Lepidopteren-Puppen und Be¬ zum Punkt 11, Gattungen: Acrocercops Wal- stimmungstabelle deren mitteleuropäischer lengren und Parectopa Clemens. Von den Überfamilien und Familien anhand der Pup¬ beiden unterscheidet sich Aristaea durch die penmerkmale bringt Patocka (1999). Das frontale Richtung des Kopffortsatzes und System und die Nomenklatur folgt Karsholt & dadurch, daß der Kopf kaudal davon nur Razowski (1996) und berücksichtigt auch schwach gewölbt ist (Abb. 2-4). Von Parec¬ Leraut (1997) und Lastuvka (1998). Das topa ferner durch die Abwesenheit je einer untersuchte Material stammt aus der Samm¬ starken Kopfborste (Abb. 3), von Acrocercops lung des Verfassers, aus dem Museum für Na¬ und Dialectica Clemens durch das in der turkunde Berlin und der Zoologischen Staats¬ Mitte nur mittelstark verjüngte Pronotum sammlung München.