DOCSLIB.ORG

M4 East EIS Volume 2B App H Part 1 Air Quality (Pdf)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
M4 East EIS Volume 2B App H Part 1 Air Quality (Pdf) M4 East Environmental Impact Statement Appendix H Volume 2B September 2015 Volume 2B Appendix H ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� Air quality impact assessment Appendix H Air quality impact assessment WestConnex Delivery Authority WestConnex M4 East Air Quality Assessment Report 4 September 2015 Prepared for WestConnex Delivery Authority Prepared by Paul Boulter, Francine Manansala, Jane Barnett Pacific Environment © WestConnex Delivery Authority The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of WestConnex Delivery Authority. You must not reproduce any part of this document without the prior written approval of WestConnex Delivery Authority. Document controls Title Project title Document type WestConnex M4 WestConnex M4 East East Air Quality Technical report to support Environmental Impact Statement Assessment Report Approval and authorisation Prepared by: Paul Boulter, Francine Manansala, Jane Barnett (Pacific Environment) Accepted on behalf Jay Stricker of the Roads and Industry Director - Transport Maritime Services by: Signed: Date 4 September 2015 Location File name AECOM Project Folders M4E - AQ V5.0 - MAIN.docx Document status Date Final report for Exhibition 4 September 2015 Contents Glossary of terms and abbreviations .................................................................................................... viii Executive summary ................................................................................................................................ xi The project ................................................................................................................................ xi The purpose of this report ........................................................................................................ xii Scenarios ................................................................................................................................. xii Methods and conclusions......................................................................................................... xiii Management of impacts .......................................................................................................... xiv 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview of the project ................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project location .............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Purpose of this report .................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Structure of the Report .................................................................................................. 5 2 Proposed project ......................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Overview of Chapter ................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Project features ........................................................................................................... 13 2.3 Construction activities ................................................................................................. 14 2.4 Specific aspects of design relating to in-tunnel and ambient air quality ..................... 18 3 Key air quality issues for the M4 East project ............................................................. 25 3.1 Overview of Chapter ................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Roads, tunnels and air quality ..................................................................................... 25 3.3 Sydney tunnels and air quality .................................................................................... 27 3.4 Advisory Committee on Tunnel Air Quality ................................................................. 28 3.5 WestConnex Strategic Environmental Review ........................................................... 28 3.6 Community Feedback Report ..................................................................................... 29 3.7 Summary of key air quality issues .............................................................................. 29 4 Regulation of emissions, air pollution and exposure .................................................. 30 4.1 Overview of Chapter ................................................................................................... 30 4.2 Policies and regulations for road vehicle emissions ................................................... 30 4.3 Fuel quality regulations ............................................................................................... 32 4.4 In-tunnel pollution limits .............................................................................................. 32 4.5 Tunnel portal emission restrictions ............................................................................. 35 4.6 Ambient air quality standards and criteria ................................................................... 35 5 Overview of assessment methodology ....................................................................... 40 5.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 40 5.2 Key documents, guidelines and policies ..................................................................... 40 5.3 Consultation with government agencies and ACTAQ ................................................. 41 5.4 Previous road and tunnel project assessments .......................................................... 41 5.5 General approach ....................................................................................................... 42 5.6 Treatment of uncertainty ............................................................................................. 52 6 Existing environment ................................................................................................... 54 6.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 54 6.2 Terrain and land use ................................................................................................... 54 6.3 Climate ........................................................................................................................ 55 6.4 Meteorology ................................................................................................................ 56 WestConnex M4 East v Roads and Maritime Services Air Quality Assessment Report 6.5 Emissions .................................................................................................................... 59 6.6 In-tunnel air quality ...................................................................................................... 65 6.7 Ambient air quality....................................................................................................... 65 7 Assessment of construction impacts ........................................................................... 68 7.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 68 7.2 Construction footprint .................................................................................................. 68 7.3 Construction activities for the project .......................................................................... 69 7.4 Assessment procedure ............................................................................................... 70 7.5 Step 1: Screening........................................................................................................ 72 7.6 Step 2: Risk assessment ............................................................................................ 72 7.7 Step 3: Mitigation ........................................................................................................ 77 7.8 Step 4: Significance of risks ........................................................................................ 77 8 Assessment of operational impacts ............................................................................ 79 8.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 79 8.2 Emissions .................................................................................................................... 79 8.3 In-tunnel air quality ...................................................................................................... 97 8.4 Dispersion modelling ................................................................................................... 99 8.5 Results for expected traffic scenarios ....................................................................... 126 8.6 Results for regulatory worst case scenarios ............................................................. 172 8.7 Summary of key assumptions ................................................................................... 173 8.8 Sensitivity tests ......................................................................................................... 179 9 Assessment of cumulative impacts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Draft Draft Draft Draft Draft Draft
    M4 Motorway from Mays Hill to Prospect DRAFTBefore andDRAFT after opening ofDRAF the T M4 Motorway from Mays Hill to Prospect Sydney case studies in induced traffic growth Michelle E Zeibots Doctoral Candidate Institute for Sustainable Futures University of Technology, Sydney PO Box 123 Broadway NSW 2007 Australia [email protected] www.isf.uts.edu.au tel. +61-2-9209-4350 fax. +61-2-9209-4351 DRAFT WorkingDRAFT Paper DRAFT Sydney case studies in induced traffic growth 1 M4 Motorway from Mays Hill to Prospect The original version of this data set and commentary was completed in May 1997 and presented in two parts. These DRAFTwere: DRAFT DRAFT 1. Road traffic data for western Sydney sector arterials: Great Western Highway and M4 Motorway 1985 – 1995 2. Rail ticketing data and passenger journey estimates for the Western Sydney Rail Line 1985 – 1995 These have now been combined and are presented here as part of an ongoing series of case studies in induced traffic growth from the Sydney Metropolitan Region. In the first, report which focussed on road traffic volumes, an error was made. The location points of road traffic counting stations were incorrect. Although this error does not affect the general conclusions, details of some of the analysis presented in this version are different to that presented in the original papers listed above. Some data additions have also been made, and so the accompanying commentary has been expanded. Acknowledgements During the collation of this data Mr Barry Armstrong from the NSW Roads & Traffic Authority provided invaluable information on road data collection methods as well as problems with data integrity.
    [Show full text]
  • Forward Pesticide Application Program North East Sydney Period of Coverage To: 31 May 2016
    Forward Pesticide Application Program North East Sydney Period of coverage to: 31 May 2016 Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd ABN 66 008 709 608 www.downergroup.com Page 1 of 21 Contents General Information 3 Information Line: 1300 776 069 3 Warnings: 3 Round-up Bioactive Herbicide 3 Lynx WG 3 Forward Program 4 MSDS 11 Downer EDI Works Pty Ltd ABN 66 008 709 608 www.downergroup.com Page 2 of 21 General Information Pesticide use is used for weed and vegetation control. The pesticides used is a standard mixture of Lynx WG Round-up Bioactive Herbicide All pesticide spraying is programmed between: Sunday to Thursday 8pm – 5am Works will be rescheduled if rain is forecasted within 24hours or the wind speed is above 15kmph. Information Line: 1300 776 069 Warnings: Round-up Bioactive Herbicide Do not contaminate dams, rivers or streams with the product or used container. When controlling weeds in aquatic situations refer to label directions to minimise the entry of spray into the water. Lynx WG DO NOT use chlorine bleach with ammonia. All traces of liquid fertilizer containing ammonia, ammonium nitrate or ammonium sulphate must be rinsed with water from the mixing and application equipment before adding chlorine bleach solution. Failure to do so will release a gas with a musty chlorine odour which can cause eye, nose, throat and lung irritation. Do not clean equipment in an enclosed area. DO NOT contaminate streams, rivers or waterways with the chemical or used containers. A nil withholding period is applicable for LYNX WG Herbicide. It is recommended, however, not to graze treated areas for 3 days to ensure product efficacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection Scoping Report BLANK PAGE Document Controls
    October 2017 Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection Scoping Report BLANK PAGE Document controls Title: Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection Scoping report Approval and authorisation Prepared by: Arcadis | Jacobs Accepted on behalf of Roads and Maritime Camilla Drover Services NSW by: Executive Director Motorways Signed: Date: 30/10/2017 Location File name BL_Scoping Report_Final Document status Date Final Scoping Report 30 October 2017 © Roads and Maritime Services NSW Executive summary Introduction and need The Western Harbour Tunnel and Beaches Link is a NSW Government initiative to provide additional road network capacity across Sydney Harbour and to improve connectivity with Sydney’s northern beaches. The Western Harbour Tunnel and Beaches Link program of works includes: The Western Harbour Tunnel and Warringah Freeway Upgrade project, comprising a new tolled motorway tunnel connection across Sydney Harbour, and the Warringah Freeway Upgrade to integrate the new motorway infrastructure with the existing road network and to connect to the Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection The Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection, including a new tolled motorway tunnel connection from the Warringah Freeway to Balgowlah and Frenchs Forest, and upgrade and integration works to connect to the Gore Hill Freeway. This scoping report relates to the Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection (the project). A separate application and scoping report has been prepared for the Western Harbour Tunnel and Warringah Freeway Upgrade project. The project would involve construction and operation of a 7.5 kilometre, tolled twin tunnel motorway to improve transport connections to the Northern Beaches, reduce road congestion, improve amenity and provide better access to employment centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaches Link & Gore Hill Freeway
    Ms Bastien Wallace General Manager of Public Affairs Bicycle NSW Bicentennial Drive, Bicentennial Park, Sydney Olympic Park NSW 2127 Director - Transport Assessment, Planning and Assessment, Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, Locked Bag 5022 PARRAMATTA NSW 2124. 22nd February, 2021 Dear Sir or Madam, RE: Beaches Link & Gore Hill Freeway EiS application number SSI-8862 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway EiS SSI-8862. Bicycle NSW has been the peak bicycle advocacy group in NSW for over forty-four years, and has over 30 affiliated local Bicycle User Groups. This submission has been prepared to be read together with the submissions of Bike North an affiliated Bicycle User Group of Bicycle NSW, and John Hawkins, a Bicycle NSW board member and subject matter expert on the needs of bike riders in the Northern Beaches. This submission contains objections to elements of the project, its rationale and to the opportunities currently missed to maximise the benefits, and minimise harms, to people and the environment. It also contains recommendations for improvements in the way the project is designed and delivered, in order to enhance its safety and amenity for bike riders and the wider community. This submission will focus on the overall project and lessons from other state road projects, whilst the submissions by Bike North and John Hawkins provide vital granular detail of the local impacts on bike riders and communities. Bicycle NSW remains and independent, non-profit funded by the contributions of our members. It makes and receives no political donations.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection Environmental Impact Statement
    Transport for NSW Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection Environmental Impact Statement Roadheader tunnelling for M4 East Building on land Cut and cover We will be building cut and cover tunnels when Tunnelling there is not enough rock cover to support the construction of the tunnels from underground. This We will be tunnelling using roadheaders. is generally where the tunnels come to the surface. Roadheaders are extremely powerful and advanced rock-cutting machines designed to excavate Cut and cover is a tunnelling method generally tunnels and caverns. They are almost always used involving excavating downwards from the surface for tunnelling on major road projects in Sydney of the ground, and installing a tunnel structure including the recently completed WestConnex M8, including a base, walls and a roof. Once the roof is New M4 tunnels and NorthConnex. in place, the tunnels are generally covered with fill and re-vegetated. Rock hammering and rock saws may be used in some areas for excavation of the tunnels, cross Cut and cover tunnels will be built where the passages and areas of sandstone within the cut Beaches Link tunnel: and cover and trough structures. • emerges within the Warringah Freeway, to the Controlled underground blasting may also be used, north of the Ernest Street bridge subject to confirmation during detailed design • emerges within Gore Hill Freeway, to the east construction planning. and west of Hampden Road bridge • off ramp to Reserve Road emerges from beneath Gore Hill Freeway The Beaches Link and Gore Hill • emerges within Burnt Bridge Creek Deviation, Freeway Connection Environmental to the north of Sydney Road Impact Statement (EIS) is now on • emerges within Wakehurst Parkway, to the public exhibition until midnight north of Kirkwood Street Monday 1 March 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection
    Transport for NSW Beaches Link and Gore Hill Freeway Connection Noise and vibration We have assessed the possible noise and vibration • providing notification about upcoming noisy impacts when we are building and when we are open and night work to traffic. Once the project is open to traffic some • laying out our sites so the noisy equipment is areas will benefit from less noise due to reduced shielded by other buildings and/or stockpiles, traffic on the surface and the new noise walls and at- where possible property noise treatments we will install. • using acoustic sheds to support 24 hour Assessing noise and vibration tunnelling activities, but only moving spoil by trucks during standard construction hours We know our work can be noisy which is why we • ensuring our equipment is serviced and will use a range of measures to reduce the impact maintained up to standard of our work when we are close to communities. • turning off machinery and equipment when We have carried out a thorough noise and vibration not in use assessment examining the potential impact to you • working within standard construction hours, when we build and operate the project. where possible These assessments involved identifying areas • managing construction activities to minimise which may experience changed levels of noise or major noise-generating work being done at vibration as a result of our work, and assessing the the same time at the same location, where type, level and duration of potential impacts and possible how we will manage them. • staging our work to avoid extended periods of consecutive night work in one area to Our assessments are conservative and always manage our impact on our neighbours, where assess the worst-case scenario such as all possible equipment being used at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 APPROVED 4.6 METRE HIGH VEHICLE ROUTES Note: The
    APPENDIX 1 APPROVED 4.6 METRE HIGH VEHICLE ROUTES Note: The following link helps clarify where a road or council area is located: www.rta.nsw.gov.au/heavyvehicles/oversizeovermass/rav_maps.html Sydney Region Access to State roads listed below: Type Road Road Name Starting Point Finishing Point Condition No 4.6m 1 City Road Parramatta Road (HW5), Cleveland Street Chippendale (MR330), Chippendale 4.6m 1 Princes Highway Sydney Park Road Townson Street, (MR528), Newtown Blakehurst 4.6m 1 Princes Highway Townson Street, Ellis Street, Sylvania Northbound Tom Blakehurst Ugly's Bridge: vehicles over 4.3m and no more than 4.6m high must safely move to the middle lane to avoid low clearance obstacles (overhead bridge truss struts). 4.6m 1 Princes Highway Ellis Street, Sylvania Southern Freeway (M1 Princes Motorway), Waterfall 4.6m 2 Hume Highway Parramatta Road (HW5), Nepean River, Menangle Ashfield Park 4.6m 5 Broadway Harris Street (MR170), Wattle Street (MR594), Westbound travel Broadway Broadway only 4.6m 5 Broadway Wattle Street (MR594), City Road (HW1), Broadway Broadway 4.6m 5 Great Western Church Street (HW5), Western Freeway (M4 Highway Parramatta Western Motorway), Emu Plains 4.6m 5 Great Western Russell Street, Emu Lithgow / Blue Highway Plains Mountains Council Boundary 4.6m 5 Parramatta Road City Road (HW1), Old Canterbury Road Chippendale (MR652), Lewisham 4.6m 5 Parramatta Road George Street, James Ruse Drive Homebush (MR309), Granville 4.6m 5 Parramatta Road James Ruse Drive Marsh Street, Granville No Left Turn (MR309), Granville
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Property Portfolio+ Property Details Asset Type Warehouse/Distribution Centre Acquisition Date Date Here Lettable Area Xx Sqm Book Value $14.20 Million
    Goodman Group December 2012 Direct property portfolio+ Property details Asset type Warehouse/distribution centre Acquisition date Date here Lettable area xx sqm Book value $14.20 million b Property name here TableAddress goes of here, contents Moorebank, NSW Australia Europe Warehouse/Distribution centres Business parks Kingston Distribution Centre 03 Air Park Paris-Sud 37 MFive Industry Park 04 Perth Airport – Amerind 05 United Kingdom Perth Airport – ITT Flygt 06 Warehouse/Distribution centres Perth Airport – Toll Transport 07 Amazon 39 Roberts Distribution Centre – Building A 08 Centrum 100 Business Park 40 Roberts Distribution Centre – Building B 09 Citadel Logistics Centre 41 Sheffield Distribution Centre 10 Earlstrees Industrial Estate 42 Southend Distribution Centre 11 Hinckley 43 Taylor Distribution Centre 12 Hoddesdon 44 Business parks Maltby 45 Airgate Business Park 14 Pioneer Business Park 46 Botany Grove Business Park 15 Royal Oak Industrial Estate 47 Campus Business Park 16 Tunnel Industrial Estate 48 Chase Business Park 17 Business parks Clayton Business Park 18 Gloucester Business Park 50 Euston Business Park 19 Forestridge Business Park 20 Homebush Corporate Park 21 Notes: IBC Corporate Centre 22 + Properties are 100% owned, unless otherwise stated. + Book values are as at 30 June 2011 and in Australian currency. Lidcombe Business Park 23 Moorabbin Business Park 24 Orion Business Park 25 Slough Business Park 26 Toyotagreen Business Park 27 Industrial estates AlexandriaProperty Description Industrial Estate 29 Property details Burrows+ Copy to Industrial go here please.Estate Copy to go here please.30 Copy to Asset type Warehouse/distribution centre go here please. Copy to go here please. Discovery Cove Industrial Estate 31 Acquisition date Date here + Copy to go here please.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport in NSW Briefing Paper No 10/99
    NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Transport in NSW by Stewart Smith Briefing Paper No 10/99 RELATED PUBLICATIONS C Sydney, Transport and Ecologically Sustainable Development, Briefing Paper No 17/95. C Air Pollution in Sydney, An Update, Briefing Paper No 11/98. ISSN 1325-5142 ISBN 0 7313 1649 5 May 1999 © 1999 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, with the prior written consent from the Librarian, New South Wales Parliamentary Library, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. Transport in NSW by Stewart Smith NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Dr David Clune, Manager .......................... (02) 9230 2484 Dr Gareth Griffith, Senior Research Officer, Politics and Government / Law ...................... (02) 9230 2356 Ms Rachel Simpson, Research Officer, Law ............ (02) 9230 3085 Mr Stewart Smith, Research Officer, Environment ....... (02) 9230 2798 Ms Marie Swain, Research Officer, Law/Social Issues .... (02) 9230 2003 Mr John Wilkinson, Research Officer, Economics ....... (02) 9230 2006 Should Members or their staff require further information about this publication please contact the author. Information about Research Publications can be found on the Internet at: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/gi/library/publicn.html CONTENTS Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction .................................................... 1 2.0 The Institutional Context .......................................... 1 2.1 Roads, Transport and the Environment ......................... 1 2.3 Motor Vehicle Emission Standards ........................... 3 2.5 Roads - an Overview of Expenditure ........................... 8 3.0 A Brief History of Rail in Australia ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Before and After Sydney's M4 Motorway
    Before and after Sydney’s M4 Motorway: Did it make the city more sustainable? Authored by: Michelle E Zeibots University of Technology, Sydney Institute for Sustainable Futures [email protected] Before and after Sydney’s M4 Motorway Zeibots ABSTRACT This paper presents an examination of traffic volumes on Sydney’s western road network before and after the opening of the Mays Hill to Prospect section of the M4 Motorway. The aim of the examination is to identify any possible traces of induced traffic growth, or new motor vehicle trips generated in response to the quicker travel times made possible by the increase in road capacity. The data show that average daily volumes on the M4 Motorway and Great Western Highway grew from just under 80,000 vehicle movements per day in 1991 to around 100,000 in 1992 after the new motorway section opened. Once business-as-usual growth (3,000 vehicles per day), road traffic reassignment (7,000 vpd) and possible mode shifting from the rail network (6,500 vpd) are taken into account, a residual volume of around 3,500 is left. This is likely to be redistributed or induced traffic growth. Induced traffic growth has significant implications for the sustainability of urban systems. These are discussed in tandem with a brief review of the debate that has taken place around induced traffic growth. Keywords Urban motorways, induced traffic growth, mode shifting State of Australian Cities National Conference 2003 Page 1 Before and after Sydney’s M4 Motorway Zeibots INTRODUCTION The focus of this paper is an examination of changes in road traffic movements that took place after the opening of the M4 Motorway section from Mays Hill to Prospect in Sydney’s west.
    [Show full text]
  • New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator's Guide
    New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide 1 March 2019 New South Wales Class 1 Load Carrying Vehicle Operator’s Guide Contents Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Approved Routes and Travel Restrictions ................................................................................................................ 3 1. Part 1 NSW Urban Zone ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Travel Restrictions in the NSW Urban Zone ................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1. Clearway and transit lane travel ............................................................................................................. 3 1.1.2. Peak hour travel ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.3. Peak hour travel – Newcastle Outer Zone ............................................................................................... 4 1.1.4. Night travel ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1.5. Sundays and state-wide public holidays ................................................................................................. 5 1.1.6. Public
    [Show full text]
  • RAW Westconnex Stage 3 Parliamentary Inquiry Submission
    http://rozelleagainstwestconnex.org RAW WestConnex Stage 3 Parliamentary Inquiry Submission 1 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this document RAW has developed this submission to the Parliamentary Inquiry into WestConnex with focus on the M4-M5 Link, also known as Stages 3A and 3 B of WestConnex. Key aspects of the Project have been selected and referred to with particular reference to the terms of the Parliamentary Inquiry. In this submission, ‘the Project’ refers to the WestConnex M4-M5 Link. 1.2 Executive Summary • It is RAW’s contention that the business case for the WestConnex project, including the cost-benefits ratio, is disturbingly inaccurate. The cost of the WestConnex project has been seriously underestimated and its forecast benefits overstated. This assessment is justified in considerable detail throughout the RAW submission and draws on data provided by SGS Economics and Planning, Searle CG and Legacy as well as from other sources. • The governance and structure of the WestConnex project including the relationship between Sydney Motorway Corporation, Roads and Maritime Services, the Treasury and its shareholding Ministers does need to be examined in detail. Substantial contributions made to both political parties by organisations in the business of providing infrastructure also need to be scrutinised in the light of the subsequent awarding of tenders for State Significant Infrastructure projects. • Allegations of corruption levelled against key players such as CIMIC and AECOM in other parts of the world have led to these companies being banned from tendering while these charges are being investigated. Good governance suggests that the same approach should also have been applied here.
    [Show full text]