DOCSLIB.ORG

Networking and Information Technology Workforce Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Networking and Information Technology Workforce Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Description ................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Study Background ................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Study Topics ......................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Country Selection ................................................................................................. 4 1.5 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 5 1.6 Defining NIT ........................................................................................................ 5 1.7 Defining the NIT Workforce ................................................................................ 6 1.8 Literature Overview ............................................................................................. 7 1.9 Relationship to Science and Engineering Workforce .......................................... 8 2. NIT Workforce in the United States ........................................................................... 9 2.1 Expected Demand for NIT Professionals ........................................................... 10 2.1.1 Size of the NIT Workforce ......................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Expected Growth of the NIT Workforce .................................................... 16 2.1.3 NIT Workforce by Sector ........................................................................... 20 2.1.4 Government NIT Workforce....................................................................... 23 2.1.5 Other NIT Workforce Characteristics ......................................................... 25 2.1.6 Demand Due to Expansion of NIT in Other S&E Disciplines ................... 29 2.2 Supply of NIT Students and Faculty .................................................................. 34 2.2.1 Pathways to NIT Careers ............................................................................ 34 2.2.2 Supply of NIT Workers from Traditional NIT Disciplines ........................ 43 2.2.3 Supply of Computer Scientists.................................................................... 46 2.2.4 Supply of Electrical Engineers.................................................................... 52 2.2.5 Supply of STEM Educated Workers........................................................... 55 2.3 NIT Labor Market Dynamics ............................................................................. 61 2.3.1 Matching Supply and Demand.................................................................... 61 2.3.2 NIT Labor Market Indicators ...................................................................... 63 2.4 Access to Foreign Talent .................................................................................... 68 2.4.1 Foreign Workers in the United States ......................................................... 68 2.4.2 Offshoring ................................................................................................... 71 2.5 Concerns and Programs to Increase Participation in NIT Careers ..................... 78 2.5.1 Computing Education ................................................................................. 78 2.5.2 K-12 Math and Science Education ............................................................. 86 2.5.3 Perceptions of NIT Careers ......................................................................... 90 2.5.4 Facilitating Other Pathways to NIT Careers ............................................... 92 2.5.5 Lessons from Other Fields .......................................................................... 95 3. Underrepresented Groups ......................................................................................... 97 3.1 Women ............................................................................................................... 98 3.1.1 Women in the NIT Workforce .................................................................... 98 3.1.2 Women in NIT Education ......................................................................... 101 3.1.3 Concerns and Programs to Increase Female Participation in NIT Careers105 3.2 African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans .................................... 111 3.2.1 Minorities is the NIT Workforce .............................................................. 111 3.2.2 Minorities in NIT Education ..................................................................... 114 -ii- 3.2.3 Concerns and Programs to Increase Minority Participation in NIT Careers 117 3.3 Persons with Disabilities .................................................................................. 127 3.4 Lessons from Other Fields ............................................................................... 129 4. International Comparisons ...................................................................................... 132 4.1 Cross-Country Trends ...................................................................................... 133 4.1.1 Size of the NIT Workforce ....................................................................... 133 4.1.2 Other Global Workforce Trends ............................................................... 137 4.1.3 Students Pursing Degrees Abroad ............................................................ 138 4.2 Country-Specific Trends and Initiatives .......................................................... 140 4.2.1 European Union ........................................................................................ 140 4.2.2 India .......................................................................................................... 155 4.2.3 China ......................................................................................................... 161 4.2.4 Singapore .................................................................................................. 164 4.2.5 Taiwan....................................................................................................... 169 4.2.6 Japan ......................................................................................................... 173 4.2.7 Republic of Korea ..................................................................................... 181 4.3 Gaps in International Information .................................................................... 187 4.4 Lessons from Other Fields ............................................................................... 188 5. Bibliography ........................................................................................................... 191 6. Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 219 -iii- FIGURES Figure 1.1: Distinguishing IT Workers from IT-Enabled Workers .................................... 6 Figure 1.2: Literature Timeline Overview .......................................................................... 8 Figure 2.1: Size of the Category 1 NIT Labor Force Estimated from CPS in Thousands (1983-2007)....................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 2.2: NIT Workforce as a Fraction of the Total Workforce (1983-2007) ............... 13 Figure 2.3: Size of the Category 1 NIT Workforce Estimated from the OES in Thousands (1999-2007)....................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 2.4: Size of the Category 1 NIT Workforce Estimated from SESTAT in Thousands (1997-2006) .................................................................................................... 16 Figure 2.5: Projected Growth of NIT Occupations Relative to Others (2006-2016) ........ 16 Figure 2.6: BLS NIT Projections Validation (1997-2006) ............................................... 18 Figure 2.7: BLS NIT Projections Validation (1999-2008) ............................................... 19 Figure 2.8: Changes in BLS NIT Projections over Time.................................................. 19 Figure 2.9: Fraction of NIT Workers by Industry (2006) ................................................. 21 Figure 2.10: NIT Workforce by Sector and Size of Company ......................................... 22 Figure 2.11: Fraction of Workforce by Employer Size NIT vs. All Workers (2006) ....... 23 Figure 2.12: Size of the Federal NIT Workforce .............................................................. 24 Figure 2.13: Age Distribution of NIT Occupations vs. All Occupations (2006) .............. 26 Figure 2.14: Degree Composition of NIT vs. Overall Workforce (2006) ........................ 27 Figure 2.15: Job Satisfaction of NIT Workers vs. All Workers (2006) ............................ 27 Figure 2.16: Reason for Participating in Work-Related Training: NIT vs. All Workers (2006) ................................................................................................................................ 28 Figure 2.17: Model Outline for STEM Education Modeling Project ............................... 34 Figure 2.18: STEM Model Feedback Loop ...................................................................... 35
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Talent, Immigration, and U.S. Economic Competitiveness
    Talent, Immigration, and U.S. Economic Competitiveness GORDON H. HANSON & MATTHEW J. SLAUGHTER | MAY 2013 Table of Contents About The Authors 1 Executive Summary 2 SECTION 1 The Contribution of Talent to American Innovation and Overall Competitiveness 4 SECTION 2 Immigration’s Contribution to U S Talent: Strong Past and Growing Importance Today 13 SECTION 3 Supply and Demand of STEM Talent in America: Immigrants Continue to Help Meet Growing Demand 23 SECTION 4 Conclusions 36 References 37 About the Authors Gordon H. Hanson is the Pacific Economic Cooperation Chair in International Economic Relations at UC San Diego (UCSD), where he is director of the Center on Emerging and Pacific Economies and founding co-director of the Policy Design and Evaluation Lab. At UCSD, he has faculty positions in the School of International Relations and Pacific Studies and the Depart- ment of Economics. Professor Hanson is also a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Matthew J. Slaughter is Associate Dean for Faculty and Signal Companies’ Professor of Management at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth. He is also a Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research, an adjunct Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, and a member of the Congressional Budget Office’s Panel of Economic Advisers. From 2005 to 2007, he served as a Member of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers. This report was sponsored and published by Compete America Coalition. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors. © 2013 Gordon H. Hanson and Matthew J.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge to Permanent Immigration Or Temporary Labor? the H-1B Visa Program Is a Source of Both Ron Hira, Howard University
    Bridge to Permanent Immigration or Temporary Labor? The H-1B Visa Program Is A Source of Both Ron Hira, Howard University Introduction Many members of the popular press, pundits, business and university leaders, and policy makers conflate and often confuse guest worker visas, such as the H-1B, with permanent immigration.11 Carly Fiorina, an advisor to John McCain’s presidential campaign in 2008 and former CEO of Hewlett-Packard, responded to a question about H-1Bs during the campaign this way, “It is in our economic interest to have really smart people wanting to come here. And so what's wrong with the H-1B visa system today, among other things, is that we curtail that program so tightly that the limits that Congress allows for H-1B visa entrance are usually filled within one week. So we have to find a more practical system for allowing smart, hard-working people to come into this country and it should be our goal to get them to stay here forever” (Bomey 2008). Reading the quote, one might expect that expanding the H-1B program is the critical change to immigration policy that is needed in order to keep skilled workers here permanently. While permanent residence allows foreign nationals to live and work in the United States permanently, guest worker visas like an H-1B allow them to live and work in the United States only temporarily (not “forever”) and under circumstances that restrict their ability to stay in the country if they don’t keep their position. These circumstances sometimes put guest workers in a precarious position that invites their exploitation, creates insecurity for them, and undermines the integrity of the labor market.
    [Show full text]
  • H-1B Visa Season Is Here the U.S
    Business Week Top News March 31, 2009, 12:01AM EST H-1B Visa Season Is Here The U.S. government begins accepting applications on Apr. 1, and all 85,000 H-1B visas available are expected to be used By Moira Herbst On Apr. 1, the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Service (USCIS) will begin accepting applications for H-1B visas for skilled workers. The number of applications will reveal U.S. employers' current appetite for overseas workers. Because of the recession, the overall volume of applications is expected to be down from the previous two years, in which the offices were instantly flooded with applications from tech companies, outsourcing firms, school districts, and a variety of other employers. Still, it's widely believed that the 85,000 visas available under the cap will be used before the fiscal year begins on Oct. 1. That's because there is some pent-up demand from 2008 applicants who didn't receive visas, and because employers say there are positions they can't fill with U.S. labor, even as unemployment rises. "It's fair to say that American companies are likely to file for fewer visas [in 2009]," Robert Hoffman, a vice-president at Oracle (ORCL) and spokesman for Compete America, a lobbying group advocating for more avenues for skilled immigration, said in a Mar. 31 conference call. "Still, all the [85,000] visas will be needed. If we're going to get out of the recession, we're going to have to innovate our way out…Continued use of the H-1B visa program is critically important." U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NFTC Signs Letter Expressing Disappointment with Revision To
    October 4, 2015 The Honorable John Kerry Secretary of State U.S. Department of State 2201 C Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20520 The Honorable Jeh Johnson Secretary of Homeland Security U.S. Department of Homeland Security 3801 Nebraska Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20528 Ms. Cecilia Muñoz Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20500 Re: The October 2015 Visa Bulletin and Immediate Eligibility for Submission of Adjustment of Status Applications Dear Secretary Kerry, Secretary Johnson, and Director Muñoz, We write to express our extraordinary concern and deepest objections to the Department of State’s revision to the October 2015 visa bulletin, published on September 25, 2015. As you are by now well aware, the Department of State’s eleventh hour revision to the October 2015 visa bulletin, and the Department of Homeland Security’s corresponding refusal to accept adjustment of status applications based on the originally published October visa bulletin, has generated tremendous chaos, uncertainty and disappointment. Literally tens of thousands of high skilled foreign professionals with already-approved immigrant petitions and their immediate family members placed their hope and trust in the promises of the original October visa bulletin, published on September 9, 2015, regarding their eligibility to file their applications from October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2015. Page 2 of 3 For the overwhelming majority of these applicants, this was the first real sign of progress in an employment-based green card journey marred by untenable backlogs, many extending well beyond a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • May 21, 2020 the Honorable Donald J. Trump
    May 21, 2020 The Honorable Donald J. Trump President of the United States of America The White House Washington, DC 20500 The Honorable Secretary Michael Pompeo Department of State 2201 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20520 The Honorable Secretary Eugene Scalia Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20210 The Honorable Acting Secretary Chad Wolf Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528 Dear Mr. President and Honorable Secretaries, The undersigned organizations, speaking for a variety of sectors and geographies across the American economy, and small, medium, and large employers, are writing about the importance of the high-skilled workforce to America’s economic recovery. In particular, the undersigned represent employers that rely on a highly skilled, college-educated, science and engineering workforce, including nonimmigrant professionals, to innovate, produce, research, develop, and lead. At this critical juncture in our nation’s history, the ability to continue to do so is in the national interest. We urge you to avoid outcomes, even for temporary periods, that restrict employment-authorization terms, conditions, or processing of L-1, H-1B, F-1, or H-4 nonimmigrants. Constraints on our human capital are likely to result in unintended consequences and may cause substantial economic uncertainty if we have to recalibrate our personnel based on country of birth. We join you in your continued commitment to protect the health and economic well-being of Americans, and hope our attached Appendix is helpful as you consider weighty judgments on how to navigate this important moment. Respectfully submitted, 324 employers and trade, industry, and higher education associations and groups across the American economy focused on the high-skilled workforce (signatory list follows Appendix) APPENDIX Importance to the nation of the STEM workforce and avoiding artificial constraints to this workforce IMPORTANCE OF THE COLLEGE-EDUCATED STEM WORKFORCE, INCLUDING NONIMMIGRANTS STEM Jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • September 19, 2012 to the MEMBERS of the U.S. HOUSE
    September 19, 2012 TO THE MEMBERS OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: The undersigned organizations ask for bipartisan passage of in the 112th Congress of H.R. 6429, “STEM Jobs Act of 2012,” to establish a new green card program for outstanding STEM advanced degree graduates. Such a reform would allow the American economy to spur innovation and create thousands of high-paying manufacturing and research jobs here in America. America has been greatly enriched by the contributions of gifted engineers, researchers, and scientists from around the world who have chosen to come here to study and innovate. However, our immigration system has failed to adapt in ways that help ensure we maintain this advantage. Each year, graduate students who complete advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) from America’s top universities are offered jobs here by U.S. employers. Hiring advanced degree STEM professionals is a key to creating and retaining jobs in a variety of sectors in our innovation economy. These are highly educated professionals who will create jobs wherever they settle, whether in the U.S. or elsewhere. Together, the undersigned represent many American employers who hire these highly educated professionals, as well as American high-tech employees. H.R. 6429 would prioritize legal immigration status for those earning STEM degrees from American graduate schools. The employer obligation to confirm that qualified American workers are not available would continue, as under current law. Our organizations appreciate the strong and sustained bipartisan congressional work on this critically important issue. We are also grateful for the thoughtful consultation on STEM visa issues with stakeholders by House leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S358
    S358 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE January 29, 2013 S. 174. A bill to appropriately restrict sales S. 6 S. 150 of ammunition; to the Committee on the Ju- At the request of Mr. REID, the name At the request of Mrs. FEINSTEIN, the diciary. of the Senator from Rhode Island (Mr. names of the Senator from Minnesota By Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Mr. REED) was added as a cosponsor of S. 6, (Mr. FRANKEN), the Senator from Ha- JOHANNS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. THUNE, a bill to reauthorize the VOW to Hire waii (Ms. HIRONO) and the Senator from Mr. VITTER, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. MORAN, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. ENZI, Mr. Heroes Act of 2011, to provide assist- Minnesota (Ms. KLOBUCHAR) were added INHOFE, and Mr. BOOZMAN): ance to small businesses owned by vet- as cosponsors of S. 150, a bill to regu- S. 175. A bill to amend the Federal Insecti- erans, to improve enforcement of em- late assault weapons, to ensure that cide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to im- ployment and reemployment rights of the right to keep and bear arms is not prove the use of certain registered pes- members of the uniformed services, unlimited, and for other purposes. ticides; to the Committee on Agriculture, and for other purposes. S. 152 Nutrition, and Forestry. S. 46 By Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. COR- At the request of Ms. MURKOWSKI, the NYN, and Mr. SESSIONS): At the request of Mr. TOOMEY, the name of the Senator from Alaska (Mr. S. 176. A bill to reject the final 5-year names of the Senator from Oklahoma BEGICH) was added as a cosponsor of S.
    [Show full text]
  • American Innovation Proclamation
    American Innovation Proclamation We, the leaders of American business and higher education, call on Congress to act quickly on an innovation agenda that will ensure continued U.S. competitiveness, enabling Americans to succeed in the global economy. Innovation leadership creates high-wage jobs and rising incomes for Americans. Innovation drives productivity and economic growth, giving American workers the tools to remain the most productive in the world and creating products, processes—and even new industries—that expand employment and boost living standards. The United States has remained the world’s innovation leader through a commitment to basic research, a world-class workforce and a climate that rewards innovation. But America cannot rest on past economic success. Our competitors are investing in innovation, improving their competitive position and, in some respects, surpassing us. Therefore, Congress must act to: Renew America’s commitment to discovery by doubling the basic research budgets at the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the Department of Energy’s Office of Science and the Department of Defense; Improve student achievement in math and science through increased funding of proven programs and incentives for science and math teacher recruitment and professional development; Welcome highly educated foreign professionals, particularly those holding advanced science, technology, engineering, or mathematics degrees, especially from U.S. universities, by reforming U.S. visa policies; Make permanent a strengthened R&D Tax Credit to encourage continued private-sector innovation investment. We, the signatories, hereby proclaim our support for these initiatives and stand ready to do our part. Craig Barrett Arthur F.
    [Show full text]
  • Sia 2005 Annual Report Contents
    SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION 2005 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 IS CLOSER THAN YOU THINK SIA 2005 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS Letter from the President 6 The Man Behind the Law 8 40 Years of Moore’s Law 10 Moore’s Law and the Emergence of the New Economy 16 About SIA 21 SIA Agenda Domestic Policy 23 Environment, Safety, and Health 25 Economy 28 World Markets 30 Technology 33 Workforce 36 2004 Robert N. Noyce Award 39 SIA Board of Directors 40 Committees 41 Member Profiles 49 Corporate Associates 61 SIA Staff 64 LAST YEAR, MORE TRANSISTORS WERE PRODUCED—AND AT A LOWER COST—THAN GRAINS OF RICE. 2 / SIA 2005 ANNUAL REPORT VIRTUALLY EVERY ASPECTCHIP OF HUMANAT CONSTANTLY ENDEAVOR. DECLINING AN EVER-INCREASING COST HAS REVOLUTIONIZED NUMBERTO DOUBLE OF COMPONENTS EVERY COUPLE ASONTO OFTHE AYEARS—THIS COMPLEXITY ABILITY OFCONTINUOUS INTEGRATED TO CRAM PROGRESSCIRCUITS ITINHAS ISSEMICONDUCTOR CONTINUED IMPOSSIBLE TOTECHNOLOGY. 40OVERSTATE YEARS THEOF EXPONENTIALIMPACT OF 40 PROGRESS YEARS OF MOORE’S* LAW: Transistors perintegratedcircuit: Transistors 1965 / he extendedtheamountoftimeto24months. with acommensuratereductionincostpercomponent.In1970, on anintegratedcircuitwasdoublingroughlyevery12months In 1965,GordonMooreobservedthatthenumberofcomponents 1966 / 1967 / 1968 / 1969 / 1970 / 1971 / 1972 / 2,500 1,000 1973 / 1974 / 3,200 4,000 Logic 1975 / 1976 / / Memory 1977 / 1978 / 29,000 16,000 1979 / 1980 / 1981 / 1982 / 120,000 64,000 1983 / 1984 / 1985 / 1986 / 275,000 256,000 1987 / 1988 / 1989 / 1990 / 1,180,000 1,000,000 1991 / 1992 / 1993 / 1994 / 3,100,000 4,000,000 1995 / 1996 / 7,500,000 16,000,000 1997 / 1998 / 24,000,000 64,000,000 1999 / 2000 / 42,000,000 128,000,000 2001 / 2002 / 220,000,000 256,000,000 2003 / 2004 / 410,000,000 256,000,000 2005 / 1,700,000,000 1,000,000,000 IN 1978, A COMMERCIAL FLIGHT BETWEEN NEW YORK AND PARIS COST $900 AND TOOK SEVEN HOURS.
    [Show full text]
  • Amicus Brief
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) WASHINGTON ALLIANCE OF ) TECHNOLOGY WORKERS, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-1170 v. ) ) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND ) SECURITY, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) BRIEF OF FWD.us, 52 COMPANIES, AND 11 INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONS REPRESENTING MORE THAN 500 ADDITIONAL COMPANIES AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF INTERVENORS Susannah Landes Weaver Andrew D. Silverman D.C. Bar No. 1023021 D.C. Bar # 1013835 DONAHUE, GOLDBERG, WEAVER & Brian P. Goldman (pro hac vice to be filed) LITTLETON Thomas King-Sun Fu (pro hac vice to be filed) 1008 Pennsylvania Avenue SE Elizabeth R. Cruikshank Washington, DC 20003 D.C. Bar # 1614375 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 51 West 52nd Street New York, NY 10019 Counsel for Amici Curiae LIST OF SIGNATORIES FWD.us eBay Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD)† EchoStar Airbnb, Inc. Ernst & Young LLP Alliance of Business Immigration Lawyers Facebook Amazon.com, Inc.† GitHub, Inc. Apple Google LLC† Asana Hewlett Packard Enterprise† Betterment HP Inc.† Bloomberg LP† Illinois Science & Technology Coalition Blue Fever Inspire Box, Inc. Intel Corporation BSA | The Software Alliance Internet Association Colorado Business Roundtable Juniper Networks Compete America Coalition LinkedIn CompTIA Micron Technology, Inc. ContextLogic, Inc. dba Wish Microsoft Criteria Corp. National Venture Capital Association Cummins Inc. New American Economy Dell Technologies NewsCred Dow Inc. Ooma Dropbox, Inc. Oracle America, Inc. † Denotes signatories represented by Donahue, Goldberg, Weaver & Littleton. i Perfect Sense Pharmavite LLC Postmates RealNetworks Salesforce SAP America, Inc.† Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Semiconductor Industry Association ShipHawk Society for Human Resource Management Sourcegraph TechNet TechNexus Tesla, Inc. The Guestbook Trax Retail Twist Bioscience Corporation Twitter Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Document
    www.CompeteAmerica.org Coalition Members AeA Altria American Council of Engineering Companies American Council on May 7, 2007 International Personnel American Immigration Lawyers Association Dear Member of Congress: Analog Devices On behalf of Compete America, a coalition of corporations, educators, research institutions Business Roundtable and trade associations, we urge Congress to put an end to our nation’s growing crisis in Business Software Alliance highly-skilled immigration by fixing our broken H-1B visa and employment-based (EB) green CompTIA card systems this year. Electronic Industries Alliance The H-1B program provides employers with visas for recruiting highly educated foreign Genentech, Inc. professionals into our workforce. The program grants only 65,000 visas per year – the same Global Personnel Alliance amount provided when it was first established in 1990, plus an additional 20,000 visas for those holding an advanced degree from a U.S. university. This arbitrary and anachronistic Google, Inc. limit does not reflect the reality of today’s global economic environment and increasingly Hewlett-Packard Company works against our nation’s competitiveness. Information Technology Association of America As you may know, last month, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Intel Corporation announced that the fiscal year 2008 allotment of H-1B visas was met on the very first day applications were accepted. This clearly demonstrates that reform can no longer wait. The International Rectifier status quo imperils America’s innovation leadership and competitiveness, allowing foreign Microsoft Corporation competitors to benefit from the best minds the world has to offer – many of whom have been Motorola Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge to Permanent Immigration Or Temporary Labor? the H-1B Visa
    Bridge to Permanent Immigration or Temporary Labor? The H‐1B Visa Program Is A Source of Both Ron Hira Howard University Introduction Many members of the popular press, pundits, business and university leaders, and policy makers make an elementary, but critically important, error when discussing high-skill immigration. They conflate and often confuse guest worker visas, such as the H-1B, with permanent immigration.1 Carly Fiorina, an advisor to John McCain’s presidential campaign in 2008 and former CEO of Hewlett-Packard, responded to a question about H-1Bs during the campaign this way, “It is in our economic interest to have really smart people wanting to come here. And so what's wrong with the H-1B visa system today, among other things, is that we curtail that program so tightly that the limits that Congress allows for H-1B visa entrance are usually filled within one week. So we have to find a more practical system for allowing smart, hard-working people to come into this country and it should be our goal to get them to stay here forever” (Bomey 2008). Reading the quote, one might expect that expanding the H-1B program is the critical change to immigration policy that is needed in order to keep skilled workers here permanently. While permanent residence allows foreign nationals to live and work in the United States permanently, guest worker visas like an H-1B allow them to live and work in the United States only temporarily (not “forever”) and under circumstances that restrict their ability to stay in the country if they don’t keep their position.
    [Show full text]