Translation from Bulgarian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Translation from Bulgarian State Coat of Arms REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER 1000 Sofia, 22, Maria Louisa Blvd., telephone: 940 62 19, fax: (+3592) 988 53 16 DECISION ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT No. 8-6/2013 Pursuant to Article 99 para 2 of the Environmental Protection Act, Article 19, para 1 of the Ordinance on the conditions and procedure for performance of environmental impact assessment (“EIA Ordinance”) and in conjunction with Article 31 of the Biological Diversity Act and Article 39, para 12 and 13 of the Ordinance on the conditions and procedure for performance of assessment of the compatibility of plans, programmes, projects and investment proposals with the subject and objectives for preservation of protected territories (“CA Ordinance”), I HEREBY APPROVE The implementation of investment proposal for Decommission of Units 1 - 4 of Kozloduy NPP Contracting authority: State Enterprise Radioactive Waste Seat: 1797 Sofia, 52A G. M. Dimitrov Blvd., floor 6 Short description of the investment proposal: The investment proposal envisages decommissioning of Units 1 to 4 of Kozloduy NPP. Units 1 to 4 of Kozloduy NPP are with reactors of the WWER-440/230 type and are commissioned during the period from 1974 (Unit 1) to 1982 (Unit 4). The general characteristics of power units 1 to 4 are as follows: • The reactors of are of the water-water reactor type operating with pressurized water, with two circuits – primary and secondary. Units 1 to 4 have a capacity of 440 MW each. 235 • The fuel for Units 1 to 4 is UO2, with enrichment of up to 3.6%, U. • Units 1 to 4 have six main coolant loops of the primary circuit, with six main circulation pumps and six steam generators. • Each of the WWER-440 reactors and the primary coolant circuit is located in a concrete structure of hermetically sealed premises. The territory planned for the needs of decommissioning Units 1 to 4 of Kozloduy NPP is situated on the site of the nuclear power plant. Same is located at a straight-line distance of 120km from the city of Sofia, equaling 200 km by road. It is situated in the northwestern part of Bulgaria on the right bank of the Danube River, at a distance of 5km to the southeast of the town of Kozloduy. The site is located opposite 694th kilometre along the line of the Danube River, at a distance of 3.7km to the south of the river’s water course and the state border with Romania. The activities of decommissioning Units 1 to 4 are planned on the territory of these Units as the generated waste is to be transported to sites on which it will be stored safely and temporarily. The area of the entire site is about 3.2 km2, and when adding the channels of circulation and service water supply, it reaches 5.2 km2. The main structures of auxiliary buildings of Units 1 to 4 of Kozloduy NPP are located within an area of 1.4 km2. From administrative point of view, Units 1 to 4 are separated from Units 5 and 6. The initial strategy for decommissioning includes the preparation and operation of the Safe Enclosure Zone (SE) of the reactor compartments (RC) and of the auxiliary buildings for a period of 35 years, and as a last stage, the performance of deferred dismantling is envisaged. In the process of analysis and assessment, while taking into account all technical, economic and social aspects and based on international experience, this strategy is updated to a strategy of continuous dismantling. The main characteristic of this alternative is the continuous dismantling of equipment and facilities and the continuous process of waste management, as well as control (monitoring) of SE, conforming to all requirements for environment protection and radiation protection. The continuous dismantling is a selected combination of the two possible alternative options: • Immediate dismantling of certain facilities and equipment; • Deferred dismantling of other facilities and equipment. The updated strategy does not provide for fixed dates for completion of the activities/stages. Within the concept of continuous dismantling, deferred dismantling does not provide for long-duration safe storage. The adopted approach has the purpose of attaining smooth transition between the individual stages. According to the Strategy for continuous dismantling of Units 1 to 4, the auxiliary buildings (AB) and the ventilation stacks (VS) are excluded from the Safe Enclosure Zone, which 2 allows their use as facilities for radioactive waste management. The auxiliary buildings remain with a special status, for the purpose of being used for the individual phases of the decommissioning activities. The scope of SE is limited to the reactor compartments of the Units, to a part of the sanitary building and their connecting trestle bridges. The updated strategy for continuous dismantling in the course of decommissioning Units 1 to 4 of Kozloduy NPP comprises the following two stages: • Stage 1: preparation and controlling of the Safe Enclosure of Reactor Compartments 1 and 2 and dismantling of the equipment falling beyond the Safe Enclosure Zone; • Stage 2: deferred dismantling of the equipment within the Safe Enclosure Zone and exemption of the building from regulatory control. The dismantling commencement is complied with the terms set in the Strategy for Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management by 2030. • The last stage of the decommissioning process is closure and reclamation. Stage 1 includes the phases of Safe Enclosure Preparation and Safe Enclosure Control, as well as dismantling of the equipment outside the SE Zone. А. Activities during the Phase of Safe Enclosure Preparation The activities performed during the preparation of RCs of Units 1 to 4 for SE, and respectively of Units 3 and 4, are grouped as follows: • Activities outside the SE Zone; • Activities along the borders of the SE Zone – isolation of all unnecessary connections of RC to the machine hall and of such connections to AB-1; dismantling of equipment and devices located on the border of the isolated contaminated circuits, the integrity of which cannot be guaranteed for the SE period, implementation of construction measures for SE preparation; • Activities in the SE Zone – marking of the systems which remain in operation during the Units’ decommissioning with signs; isolation of all systems which are not needed for SE (ventilation, electric, controls and instruments (C&I), technological); isolation of the operating part of the systems which remain functioning during SE within the part which does not remain in operation (ventilation, electric, C&I, technological) removal of fluids from the systems; removal of hazardous materials, removal of combustible materials; removal of iodine filtres; replacement of aerosol filtres remaining in operation during SE; switch- off/disconnection of all electric systems, which are put out of operation in SE; removal of the insulation of the systems which are subject of decontamination; conservation of the systems 3 and equipment, which may be used during or after SE (manipulation systems, hoisting equipment); arranging of ventilation zones (sections); adaptation of the existing systems which are necessary for SE. B. Activities during the Safe Enclosure Control Phase Safe Enclosure of Reactor Compartment 1 and Reactor Compartment 2 The phase is characterized by minimum control and management activities: periodic inspections rounds and testing of the equipment; replacement of aerosol filtres; maintenance of the buildings and facilities remaining in operation; renovation of the operation systems during the SE period (if necessary); installation of heaters in the steam generator confinements (if necessary). C. Dismantling of the equipment outside the Safe Enclosure Zone (machine hall) Dismantling of the equipment outside the Safe Enclosure Zone is planned by starting with the equipment in the non-contaminated buildings and in the Machine Hall (MH) of Units 1 -4, namely: • Dismantling of non-contaminated equipment; • Dismantling of turbines; • Dismantling of the secondary circuit; • The plan of Kozloduy NPP for dismantling of the equipment from Units 1 to 4 of Kozloduy NPP outside the SE Zone follows the usual practice of projects for decommissioning of nuclear power units. For dismantling the equipment in the machine halls and other auxiliary buildings there shall be used conventional, predominantly manual or remotely controlled tools and cutting machines. Smaller components and equipment will be initially removed in order to make additional space for removal and maneuvering with large components. The end of Stage 1 is determined based on the dismantling completion outside the Safe Enclosure Zone. The performance of Stage 2 starts before the completion of Stage 1, as per the terms underlying the Strategy for SNF and RAW management by 2030 for the purpose of ensuring smooth transition between the two stages. During Stage 2 dismantling of the equipment in the Safe Enclosure Zone will be carried out. It is envisaged for the large equipment of the primary circuit of the Units to be dismantled in whole and stored in a repository specially built on the site for temporary storage of transitional RAW (“decay storage”). Dismantling of the reactors and active components 4 around them will be performed. It is planned to dismantle the reactor buildings last, in whole (without cutting) following a reverse order relative to their installation order, as for their removal from the pits and transferring to the transport corridor, the 250-ton cranes located in the RC will be used. The inner reactor building equipment will be returned inside the reactor building and will be transported to the repository and stored in one common container with the reactor building. It is planned for the reactor buildings to be stored in concrete or reinforced concrete containers specially developed for that purpose. At the end of this stage, the site and the building will be exempted from control in order to be used for other industrial purposes.
Recommended publications
  • Original Scientific Paper DETERMINATION of WATER
    www.ebscohost.com www.gi.sanu.ac.rs, www.doiserbia.nb.rs, J. Geogr. Inst. Cvijic. 67(1) (11–25) Original scientific paper UDC: 911.2:556.53 (497.2) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1701011I DETERMINATION OF WATER RESOURCES IN RIVERS IN THE BULGARIAN BASINS OF THE LOWER DANUBE Plamen Iliev Ninov*, Tzviatka Ivanova Karagiozova*, Maya Yordanova Rankova*1 * National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology — BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria Received: December 29, 2016; Reviewed: March 10, 2017; Accepted: March 31, 2017 Abstract: Object of the study is surface water bodies from category “rivers” according to Water Framework Directive 2000/60/ЕС. Surface water assessment is important for number of activities such as: water management in the country, making reports to international agencies, determining the change of the resources in the light of upcoming climate changes. The determination of water resources is based on information of hydrometric stations from the monitoring network system in the National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology — Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (NIMH- BAS) in which real ongoing and available water flows that are subject of management are registered. In the study a technology for surface water bodies in the Bulgarian basins of the lower Danube is applied which has been developed in the frame of cooperative project together with the Ministry of Environment and Water. This is absolutely true for the Bulgarian section of the Danube River basin which is expressed in big number and variety of hydrological homogeneous sections. The river flow is characterized with annual and inter-annual variability determined by climatic factors and anthropogenic influences.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Water Resources in Rivers in the Bulgarian Basins of the Lower Danube
    www.ebscohost.com www.gi.sanu.ac.rs, www.doiserbia.nb.rs, J. Geogr. Inst. Cvijic. 67(1) (11–25) Original scientific paper UDC: 911.2:556.53 (497.2) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1701011I DETERMINATION OF WATER RESOURCES IN RIVERS IN THE BULGARIAN BASINS OF THE LOWER DANUBE Plamen Iliev Ninov*, Tzviatka Ivanova Karagiozova*, Maya Yordanova 1 Rankova* * National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology — BAS, Sofia, Bulgaria Received: December 29, 2016; Reviewed: March 10, 2017; Accepted: March 31, 2017 Abstract: Object of the study is surface water bodies from category “rivers” according to Water Framework Directive 2000/60/ЕС. Surface water assessment is important for number of activities such as: water management in the country, making reports to international agencies, determining the change of the resources in the light of upcoming climate changes. The determination of water resources is based on information of hydrometric stations from the monitoring network system in the National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology — Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (NIMH- BAS) in which real ongoing and available water flows that are subject of management are registered. In the study a technology for surface water bodies in the Bulgarian basins of the lower Danube is applied which has been developed in the frame of cooperative project together with the Ministry of Environment and Water. This is absolutely true for the Bulgarian section of the Danube River basin which is expressed in big number and variety of hydrological homogeneous sections. The river flow is characterized with annual and inter-annual variability determined by climatic factors and anthropogenic influences.
    [Show full text]
  • DECISION on ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT No. 2-2/2014
    State Coat of Arms REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER 1000 Sofia, 22, Maria Louisa Blvd., telephone: 940 62 19, fax: (+3592) 988 53 16 DECISION ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT No. 2-2/2014. Pursuant to Article 99 para 2 of the Environmental Protection Act, Article 19, para 1 of the Ordinance on the conditions and order for performance of environmental impact assessment (“EIA Ordinance”) and in conjunction with Article 31 of the Biological Diversity Act and Article 39, para 12 and 13 of the Ordinance on the conditions and order for performance of assessment of the compatibility of plans, programmes, projects and investment proposals with the subject and objectives for preservation of protected territories (“CA Ordinance”), I HEREBY APPROVE The implementation of investment proposal for “Facility for Treatment and. Conditioning of Radioactive Waste with a High Volume Reduction Factor at Kozloduy Nuclear Power Plant Facility (HVRF)” Contracting authority: Kozloduy NPP EAD Seat: town of Kozloduy, 3321 Short description of the investment proposal: The investment proposal envisages the construction of Facility for Treatment and. Conditioning of Radioactive Waste with a High Volume Reduction Factor at Kozloduy NPP though the use of plasma technology, whereby a reduction in the volume will be achieved in respect of low and intermediate level radioactive waste (RAW) stored in the temporary storage repositories located on the site of Kozloduy NPP and their subsequent safe disposal. The selected technology is high-energy, capable
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 41St International Association for Danube Research Conference
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR DANUBE RESEARCH CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS SIBIU, ROMANIA, 2016 ~ The 41st International Association for Danube Research (IAD) Conference, Sibiu, Romania, 2016 ~ - Tributaries as key elements in sustainable management of the Danube River basin - Editorial Board • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Angela CURTEAN-BĂNĂDUC, Romania • Dr. Doru BĂNĂDUC, Romania • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Thomas HEIN, IAD, Germany • Dr. Harald KUTZENBERGER, Austria • Prof. Dr. Erika SCHNEIDER-BINDER, Germany Scientific committee • Dr. John AKEROYD, UK • Prof. Dr. Aurel ARDELEAN, Romania • Dr. Grigore BABOIANU, Romania • Prof. Dr. Klaus BATTES, Romania • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Angela BĂNĂDUC, Romania • Dr. Doru BĂNĂDUC, Romania • Prof. Dr. Acad. Árpád BERCZIK, Hungary • Dr. Jürg BLOESCH, Switzerland • Prof. Dr. Marieta COSTACHE, Romania • Prof. Dr. Ion DEDIU, Moldavia • Dr. Mária DINKA, Hungary • Dr. Edith DURISCH-KAISER, Switzerland • Dr. Gábor GUTI, Hungary • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Nicolae GĂLDEAN, Romania • Prof. Dr. Stoica GODEANU, Romania • Prof. Dr. Acad. Marian-Traian GOMOIU, Romania • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Thomas HEIN, Germany • Dr. Jan HELESIC, Czech Republic • Prof. Dr. Alois HERZIG, Austria • Prof. Dr. Georg JANAUER, Austria • Dr. Roumen KALCHEV, Bulgaria • Dr. Anita KISS, Hungary • Dr. Harald KUTZENBERGER, Austria • Dr. Milan LEHOTSKY, Slovakia • Dr. Mirjana LENHARDT, Serbia • Dr. Artem LYASHENKO, Ukraine • Dr. Melita MIHALJEVIC, Croatia ~ The 41st International Association for Danube Research (IAD) Conference, Sibiu, Romania, 2016 ~ - Tributaries as key elements in sustainable management of the Danube River basin - • Prof. Dr. Ionel MIRON, Romania • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Laura MOMEU, Romania • Dr. Ion NĂVODARU, Romania • Dr. Gheorghe OAIE, Romania • Dr. Martin PUSCH, Germany • Dr. Snezana RADULOVIC, Serbia • Prof. Dr. Geta RAȘNOVEANU, Romania • Dr. Cristina SANDU, Romania • Dr. Ulrich SCHWARZ, Germany • Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • The 41St IAD Conference
    The 41st IAD Conference “Tributaries as Key Elements in Sustainable Management of the Danube River Basin” September 13th – 16th 2016, Sibiu, Romania PROGRAMME Conference Programme September 13, 2016 1400-2200 PARTICIPANTS’ REGISTRATION at the “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Faculty of Sciences, ground floor, room A04. Address: Ion Raţiu Street, No. 5-7, Sibiu, tel. 0722604338, [email protected], [email protected] Registration office at: "Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, Faculty of Sciences location. Registration office at: "Lucian Blaga" University of Sibiu, Faculty of Sciences. September 14, 2016 ULBS Senate Conference Hall, Lucian Blaga Street, No. 2, Sibiu 1000-1100 OPENING CEREMONY • Assoc. Prof. Dr. Angela Curtean-Bănăduc “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu, Faculty of Sciences • Prof. Dr. Eng. Ioan Bondrea – Rector “Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu • Prof. Dr. Thomas Hein ‒ President of IAD University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna • Prof. Dr. Harald Kutzenberger International Association for Danube ‒ General Secretary of IAD • Prof. Dr. Erika Schneider-Binder International Association for Danube Research 1100-1130 KEYNOTE PRESENTATION E. Schneider-Binder ‒ State and human induced changes on rivers and their riparian zones in the lower Danube Basin and their consequences for ecosystems functioning and integrity. 1130-1200 Coffee break 1200-1345 ORAL PRESENTATION SESSION ‒ Chair T. Hein 1200-1215 S. Preiner and T. Hein ‒ Application of dynamic water quality models to simulate nutrient cycling and aquatic primary production in heterogeneous river-floodplain systems. 1215-1230 D. Datcu, M. Sava and G. Rîşnoveanu ‒ Responses of stream macroinvertebrate communities to hydromorphological deterioration. 1230-1245 L. Pehlivanov ‒ Downstream movement of fishes in the middle course of the Skat River (Northwest Bulgaria, Danube Basin).
    [Show full text]
  • Holocene and Recent Alluvial Sediments in Ogosta River Basin (Northwestern Bulgaria) and Anthropogenic Impact Assessment
    Holocene and Recent Alluvial Sediments in Ogosta River Basin (Northwestern Bulgaria) and Anthropogenic Impact Assessment Dora Angelova Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria email: [email protected] Abstract The catchment basin of Ogosta river takes an area of 3,110 sq km. It involves well developed river system of 40 feeders inclusive. In the region of Stara Planina mountain and the Fore Balkan the rivers are with narrow beds but in some places form large valleys. In the Danube lowland these rivers form wide floodplain terraces and strongly meandering river beds. The thickness of Holocene and recent alluvial sediments varies into wide ranges (from 1 m up to 40 m), as well as the sedimentation environment is changeable, too. The floodplain terraces width varies from 1 m to 2 km. The alluvial sediments in the Ogosta river basin are subjected to strongest anthropogenic alterations as a result of the urbanization, agricultural activities, mining industry, etc. Ninety four recent terrains strongly polluted with substandard substances in soil and water as a result of the anthropogenization. Some of the terrains are so strongly polluted with heavy metals and arsenic that they are defined as non- reclaimable. Generally, the pollution came in the period 1964-1979 from mining and flotation plants, which are located in Ogosta river upstream. Heavy metals and arsenic transportation is realized by river water during the high water, and their accumulation in alluvium comes in low water periods. The strong intensification of living style and agriculture, especially in the second half of 20th century also increased the alluvium pollution with chemical substances, living and construction waists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Key Factor for a Successful Territorial Cohesion: Cross-Border Cooperation –
    Volume 11, Issue 1, pp. 006 - 022 Article Info: Received: 27/01/2020; Received in revised form: 13/02/2020; Accepted: 19/10/2020 Corresponding Author: *[email protected] https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.k.sey.11.1.6.22 Spatial and temporal aspects of high streamflow periods within the Danube drainage basin in Bulgaria Kalin SEYMENOV1* 1 Sofia University, Bulgaria Keywords: Abstract high flow, High flow events are the main prerequisites for floods with negative social and floods, environmental consequences. Their study under uncertain and changing climate threshold method, gives informative knowledge for further management decisions. This paper seeks Danube River, to analyze the spatio-temporal parameters of high flow periods within the Danube Bulgaria drainage basin in Bulgaria. Three characteristics of the hazard phenomena: time of occurring, frequency and duration are investigated. The analysis is based on daily discharge data collected from 20 gauging stations for the period 2000–2005. The surplus water quantities are identified by the Threshold level method using fixed values – Q25 and Q5, derived from the flow duration curve. Results show a concentration of the high flow periods during the spring hydrological season, with an average duration up to six weeks. The calculations establish positive correlations between the duration of high flow, the altitude of catchments, and the density of drainage network. The resulting information can serve as a support for the development of preliminary flood risk assessments in the Danube River Basin. The publication of the European Journal of Geography (EJG) is based on the European Association of Geographers’ goal to make European Geography a worldwide reference and standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Full Article
    UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA Series: Geography UNIVERSITATEA DIN CRAIOVA Seria: Geografie Vol. 14 (new series) – 2011 Vol. 14 (serie nouă) – 2011 MAJOR BASINS WITHIN THE DANUBE HYDRO- GEOGRAPHICAL REGION WITHIN BULGARIA BAZINELE MAJORE DIN REGIUNEA HIDRO- GEOGRAFICA BULGĂREASCĂ Nelly HRISTOVA 1 Abstract: The present paper discusses the division of some sub-basins in the Danube River Basin Directorate. It proposes the division of the main river basin the Ogosta and the rivers west of the Ogosta and the unification of the catchment of the Erma and the Nishava River in a major river basin. This suggestion is based on the similarity of natural features, hydrographic and hydrological parameters and typification of water bodies according to UE Water Framework Directive. The result will be a better water management in these river basins. Key-words: the Danube River Basin Directorate, major basins, hydrographic and hydrological parameters Cuvinte cheie: Administraţia Bazinală a Fluviului Dunărea, bazine principale, parametrii hidrografici şi hidrologici Introduction EU Water Framework Directive (2000/60) establishes a single classification of surface water system for the first time. It separates the aquatic ecosystems in several groups arranged in strict subordination: eco-regions, categories water ecosystems (river, lake, coastal waters and transitional water), types of water ecosystem, water bodies – unit for assessment and management of waters. Meanwhile, at the core of the Directive is an integrated approach for sustainable water management in the river basin. According to Water Framework Directive, the EU member states have to identify all the river basins lying within their territory and assign them to individual river basins. For the management of the water basin, 4 Basin Directorates were established by the Ministry of Environment and Water in 2002-2003 – Danube district, Black Sea district, East Aegean district, West Aegean district.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria 118 Bulgaria Bulgaria
    BULGARIA 118 BULGARIA BULGARIA 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. General Overview Bulgaria is a country situated in the south-eastern Europe and it occupies the biggest part of the Balkan peninsula. The northern border of Bulgaria continues for 470 km on the Danube River and later in south-eastern direction to the Black Sea for about 139 km on land. In eastern direction, Bulgaria borders the Black Sea while to the south there is a 752 km long border with Turkey and Greece. To the west, the country has a border with the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Yugoslavia. Within these borders, Bulgaria has 110,975 km2 surface, including an altitude correction. The demographic situation in the country is characterized with a clear tendency of decrease in the population (Table 1). For the period between 1985 and 1998, the population has decreased by 719,509 people (8.0%). At the end of 1994, the population of the country numbered 8.43 million people and population density of 76 persons per square kilometre. There exists a negative trend in the change of the population, which was for 1990 -0.4%; for 1991 -1.7%; for 1992 -2.2%; and for 1993 -2.9%; see Figure 1, which shows the birth and death rates from 1992 to 2000. According to the National Institute of Statistics, the total number of the population is expected to decrease by another 320,000 (319,392) people around the year 2000, compared to 1993 (Table 2 and Figure 2). TABLE 1. POPULATION INFORMATION Growth rate (%) 1980 1960 1970 1980 1990 1996 1997 1998 to 1998 Population (millions) 7.9 8.5 8.9 8.7 8.3 8.3 8.2 -0.4 Population density (inhabitants/km2) 71 77 80 78 75 75 74 -0.4 Urban population as percent of total 38 53 63 67 68 68 68 0.5 Predicted population growth rate (%) 1998 to 2000 -1.1 Area (1000 km2) 111.0 Source: IAEA Energy and Economic Database; Country Information.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Burbot (Lota Lota L.) in the Lower Danube (Bulgaria) – a Species Threatened by Climate Change
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 910: 143–161Burbot (2020) in the Lower Danube – a species threatened by the climate changes 143 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.910.47866 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Status of the burbot (Lota lota L.) in the Lower Danube (Bulgaria) – a species threatened by climate change Pencho G. Pandakov1, Teodora M. Teofilova2, Nikolay D. Kodzhabashev1 1 Forestry University, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Hunting and Game Management, 10 Kliment Ohridski Blvd., 1756 Sofia, Bulgaria 2 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research (IBER), Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria Corresponding author: Pencho G. Pandakov ([email protected]) Academic editor: M.E. Bichuette | Received 31 October 2019 | Accepted 19 December 2019 | Published 10 February 2020 http://zoobank.org/C2C935EE-B9E4-4A59-AE46-8E267B8C9229 Citation: Pandakov PG, Teofilova TM, Kodzhabashev ND (2020) Status of the burbot (Lota lota L.) in the Lower Danube (Bulgaria) – a species threatened by climate change. ZooKeys 910: 143–161. https://doi.org/10.3897/ zookeys.910.47866 Abstract The study provides data on the catch composition, length-weight relationship, age structure, gender struc- ture, growth, maturation, fecundity, distribution and conservation status of the burbot Lota lota (Lin- naeus, 1758) in Bulgaria. During six consecutive winters (2008–2014) a total of 395 burbot specimens were caught. The total length and the weight of the specimens ranged from 16 to 51 cm and 29.8 to 1057 g, respectively. Seven age classes were represented (3- to 9-years-old), with 3-, 4-, and 5-years-old most abundant.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report of the Republic of Bulgaria on the Fulfilment of the Obligations on the Convention on Nuclear Safety
    Second Report of the Republic of Bulgaria on the fulfilment of the obligations on the Convention on Nuclear Safety October, 2001 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................5 1. Introduction......................................................................................................................5 2. Policy of the Republic of Bulgaria in the Field of Nuclear Power Production...........6 Legislative Framework in the Republic of Bulgaria................................................................ 6 Institutional Framework ....................................................................................................... 6 Energy Market..................................................................................................................... 6 3. Ongoing National Programmes Related to the Nuclear Facilities ..............................7 II. ARTICLE BY ARTICLE REVIEW..................................................................................8 Article 6 – Existing Nuclear Installations ..........................................................................8 1. Brief Review of the Contents of the First National Report on Article 6 of the Convention ..... 8 2. Improvement at Kozloduy NPP Units 1 through 4.............................................................. 8 3. Units 5 and 6 of Kozloduy NPP ...................................................................................... 10 4. Spent Fuel
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment
    EIA of Hot Dip Zing Galvanizing Facility - Oryahovo, BG. Executive Summarv. The new Hot Dip Zinc GalvantzingPlant will be the only galvanrzingfacility in NorthernBulgaria. The new galvamzingplant will be installed on the premisesof a former metallurgy facility, which comprised a foundry and electro-galvamzing facility. The Plant's capacrtywill be 6,000 t p.a. assuminga one-shiftprocessing schedule. The new Hot Dip Zing GalvantzingPlant will be situatedin the North- Westernpart of Bulgaria, and located in the town of Oryahovo - a port on the DanubeRiver, with a customsoffice and a ferry-boatcomplex (see Appendix I.). During the period: October 2006 March 2007, a full Environmental lmpact AssessmentStudy (EIA Study) of the proposedHot Dip Zinc GalvanrzingProject (i.e., the Project) actlities was performed, and a final EIA Report, documenting the EIA processesand results was prepared. The EIA Report was developedin compliancewith the relevant guidelines,set by the OverseasPrivate Investment Corporation(OPIC), the IFC, and the BG Ministry of Environmentand Waters(BG MEW). This EIA Reportwould be submittedto OPIC in June2007. 1. ProjectProponents. A specialentity (i.e., a "SpecialPurpose Corporation", or "SPC") will be incorporated to implement the Project with the participation of a Bulgarian and an American partner. Bulgarian Purtner in this project is 66TRF1.-P"EOOD, a Bulgarian company, which has acquiredland, production,storage and administrativebuildings, the related infrastructure and machinery and equipment located in the town of Oryahovo. "TRE P" EOOD holds clean title over assetsacquired against a considerationbelow the investment cost for setting up a similar plant which contributedto the lower overall cost of the Project. American partner in this project is "GTI Engineering Inc", - an U.S.
    [Show full text]