DOCSLIB.ORG

Lessons Learned from Past & Current ESA-NASA Collaborations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lessons Learned from Past & Current ESA-NASA Collaborations Lessons Learned ! from Past & Current ESA-NASA Collaborations" NRC Committee on NASA Participation in Euclid" January 2011" " George Helou" IPAC, Caltech" NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-1 OUTLINE" Question: What are the successes and failures of previous missions where NASA astrophysics has contributed to an ESA mission (ISO, Herschel, Planck)?" u Study Cases:" v Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) v Spitzer Space Telescope v Herschel Space Telescope v Planck Surveyor " Question: What are your recommendations for the framework for US role in Euclid?" u Suggestions for Euclid Participation" NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-2 IRAS: First mid-to-far-IR All-Sky Survey u IRAS was the first IR all-sky survey, at 12, 25, 60 and 100µm: Si and Ge photo-conductors u Collaboration between US, Netherlands, UK, 1983 Main data products: u Point Source Catalog ~1 Jy sensitivity u Faint Source Catalog, a few times deeper u All-Sky Image Atlas at 4΄ resolution u On-demand co-added survey data v Compact sources v Resolution enhancement NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-3 ISO: First Pointed IR Observatory in Space u Four versatile instruments, 2 imagers, 2 spectrometers, covering 3-240µm: Si, Ge photoconductors (1995-98) u ESA mission with minor NASA, ISAS participation NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-4 Spitzer: the NASA IR Great Observatory u Three instruments, imaging at {3.6, 4.5, 6.8, 8}, {24, 70 and 160} µm, 1 spectrometer 5-38µm, SED mode 60-120µm: Si, Ge photoconductors u NASA mission, August 2003 – May 2009 cold u Warm mission since 2009: 3.6, 4.5 µm imaging NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-5 [OIII] 88 µm Herschel: Cornerstone FIR/Submm Observatory z = 3.04 u Three instruments: imaging at {70, 100, 160}, {250, 350 and 500} µm; spectroscopy: grating [55-210]µm, FTS [194-672]µm, Heterodyne [157-625]µm; bolometers, Ge photoconductors, SIS mixers; 3.5m primary at ambient T u ESA mission with significant NASA contributions, May 2009 – February 2013 cold NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-6 ISO: Deal and Outcome u ISO was an ESA-only mission, with some US individual participation as co-investigators on instrument teams and on the ISO Science Team, and some “scientific associates” v Individual access to Guaranteed Time u Late-breaking agreement: DSN time for 30min/orbit (~30min/day) of Guaranteed Time, plus access to Open Time competitions v ISAS funded additional operations shift, also for 30min/orbit of GT v NASA & ISAS named 1 representative each to the ISO Science Team v Two or three US-based scientists were invited to join the TAC u NASA competed its GT independently, selecting 4 Key Projects u In Open Time, the US community was allocated ~30% of the time (PI), and participated on many more selected proposals u Net result: US community was responsible for ~25% of ISO time v NASA Astrophysics investment was all in Data Analysis funding and community support at IPAC v Data quality issues, slightly ameliorated by IPAC help (late arrival) NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-7 Spitzer: Deal and Outcome u Spitzer is a NASA Great Observatory. u Spitzer TAC and review committees included non-U.S. scientists as a matter of course, and all calls were open worldwide u European scientists (PI’s) were responsible for ~20% of Open Time on Spitzer, and participated on many more selected proposals u NB: ISO-SIRTF debate was very similar to XMM-AXAF debate NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-8 Herschel: Deal and Outcome (1) u Herschel is an ESA Cornerstone Mission (~B$ class) with significant NASA contributions (10-15% of mission cost up to launch) u Community advocacy for Herschel-like mission originated as a Transatlantic movement, and ESA moved on it first v Instrument proposals to ESA had US co-I’s and components u NASA primary H/W participation was in enabling detector technologies for 2 instruments v Bolometers and amplifiers assembly for SPIRE, plus expertise v SIS mixers and other components for HIFI, plus expertise u Instrument Team participation results in access to GT u Two US-based mission scientists and optical system scientist were selected in open competition, with additional access to GT NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-9 Herschel: Deal and Outcome (2) u Aside from the above, ESA and NASA exchanged LoA: v NASA provides Science Operations expertise and software (Spitzer heritage), shares any s/w or documentation developed at NHSC/IPAC v NASA provides resident astronomer at Herschel Science Center in Spain v ESA provides “appropriate US scientist representation on HOTAC” v ESA provides NHSC with full access, as “integral part of the Herschel Science Ground System” v NB: ESA-NASA reciprocally open calls for proposals are standard u Net result: Open Time calls on Herschel have resulted in U.S. PI’s carrying about half the Open Time, in addition to GT participation v Additional participation by US co-I on ~35% of Open Time v A third of all Key Projects had U.S. PI’s and all had U.S. participation u Data quality issues are much less severe, and NHSC has much more insight, ability to help NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-10 Planck: State-of-the-Art CMB+Astrophysics Survey u Two instruments, nine bands: HFI {857, 545, 353, 217, 143, 100} GHz, LFI {70, 44 and 30} GHz; bolometers cooled to 100mK, HEMT u ESA mission with significant NASA contributions, May 2009 – January 2012 cold; LFI on-going NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-11 Planck: Deal and Outcome (1) u Planck is an ESA Mid-Sized Mission with significant NASA contributions (10-15% of mission cost up to launch) u Community advocacy for Planck-like mission originated as a Transatlantic movement, and ESA moved on it first v Instrument proposals to ESA had US co-I’s and components u NASA primary H/W participation was in enabling new technologies v Spider-web bolometers and amplifiers for HFI, including polarization- sensitive bolometers, plus expertise v HEMT radio amplifiers for LFI, plus expertise v Hydrogen sorption coolers to get down from passive (~50K) to ~20K u Two US members on the Science Team, ~80 US Planck scientists v Full access to the data, software, discussions by US Planck scientists NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-12 Planck: Deal and Outcome (2) u MoU between NASA and ESA v NASA provides engineering support for delivered H/W v NASA provides support for mission design & planning, data analysis u US Planck scientists account for 20-25% of data analysis activity v Lead on several activities (in CMB, SZ, etc), and are part of all activities v Have led many papers in last few years v Planck key papers will be by “Planck Collaboration, authors-alphabetical” u NASA first visible contribution was in Early-Release Compact Source Catalog (ERCSC), and help with ESZ, ECC u ERCSC + ESZ have motivated >60 papers from non-Planck scientists since their release in January 2011 v First look at all-sky catalog at λ>300μm, ~104 sources, very fast release u The Planck Archive will have tremendous potential v US version of Archive will respond to community needs for tools NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-13 Summary: Lessons Learned u NASA and ESA can both fund, build and operate major missions v Euclid will happen u ISO did not kill SIRTF, XMM did not kill AXAF v Euclid by itself will not kill WFIRST, nor will NASA buying into Euclid u The unique capabilities of the U.S. are in leading-edge technologies, but more especially in human (and institutional) resources v If the community has access & support, it will get its share of the science u Good relations at working level are crucial, so create a robust high- level framework for participation, and let working relations develop: v Among scientists: build a science community v Among instrument/payload builders: optimize interfaces locally v Among Science Centers: learn by doing, add value for all users u Critical Mass of participation is important: v Single US scientist on Science Team is thin; <10% share is risky NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-14 Suggestions for a Framework for Participation in Euclid (1) u NASA & ESA would agree on H/W, S/W, Ops contributions u NASA & ESA would agree on seats on the Science Team, rules for individual participation in Consortium v This guarantees data access, input on decisions, insight v Let Science Team address items such as publication policy, authorship rules, mechanics of data access u ESA sets policy for public access to data; NASA reviews & concurs v Astrophysics vs. Dark Energy use, schedule and depth of access, etc v Parallel science archives (U.S. and EU) highly desirable: Facilitating Dark Energy research, other archival research by non-Euclid U.S. scientists u These agreements should be designed to allow the US community to compete on an equal footing, both within Euclid Consortium and in the community at large NRC Committee on Euclid Participation, January 2011 Helou-15 Suggestions for a Framework for Participation in Euclid (2) u In order to enable the U.S. Community to seize the opportunity, NASA just needs to follow its tradition of supporting research: u NASA would fund selected Science Team members to set up teams capable of exploiting data in a timely fashion v This was already planned in the earlier NASA solicitation for Euclid u NASA would provide data analysis funding to community at-large u NASA would establish US Science Center to support all Euclid users v Selected Science Teams, individual Consortium members, and community at-large v This Center would also provide NASA’s S/W contributions to the mission v NASA Herschel Science Center works well in this dual capacity, and is a valuable resource for the community and for the mission, i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 149
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [ X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 1-16417 NUSTAR ENERGY L.P. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 74-2956831 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 2330 North Loop 1604 West 78248 San Antonio, Texas (Zip Code) (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (210) 918-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common units representing partnership interests listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Securities registered pursuant to 12(g) of the Act: None. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Rfi Issue and Spectrum Sharing Paradigm for Future Satellite
    RFI ISSUE AND SPECTRUM SHARING PARADIGM FOR FUTURE SATELLITE COMMUNICATION AND RADIO ASTRONOMY SYSTEMS by Yucheng Dai APPROVED BY SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. Hlaing Minn, Chair Dr. John P. Fonseka Dr. Andrea Fumagalli Dr. Murat Torlak Copyright © 2020 Yucheng Dai All rights reserved Dedicated to my family, I received no more powerful and effective support than the support from my beloved family. RFI ISSUE AND SPECTRUM SHARING PARADIGM FOR FUTURE SATELLITE COMMUNICATION AND RADIO ASTRONOMY SYSTEMS by YUCHENG DAI, BS, MS DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The University of Texas at Dallas in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS August 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my PhD adviser, Dr. Hlaing Minn, for his valuable advice, dedicated guidance, and unparalleled support that made this work possible. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my committee members, Drs. Andrea Fumagalli, John P. Fonseka, and Murat Torlak. I would like to thank my parents, for their guidance to the way to PhD, and for their support both spiritually and financially. I also want to thank my friend and lab-mate, Dong Han, who shows an example of dedicated and helpful PhD student to me. June 2020 v RFI ISSUE AND SPECTRUM SHARING PARADIGM FOR FUTURE SATELLITE COMMUNICATION AND RADIO ASTRONOMY SYSTEMS Yucheng Dai, PhD The University of Texas at Dallas, 2020 Supervising Professor: Dr. Hlaing Minn, Chair Wireless services, which utilize radio spectrum resources, can be classified into two types: passive wireless services and active wireless services.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW ARTICLE the NASA Spitzer Space Telescope
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 78, 011302 ͑2007͒ REVIEW ARTICLE The NASA Spitzer Space Telescope ͒ R. D. Gehrza Department of Astronomy, School of Physics and Astronomy, 116 Church Street, S.E., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 ͒ T. L. Roelligb NASA Ames Research Center, MS 245-6, Moffett Field, California 94035-1000 ͒ M. W. Wernerc Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, MS 264-767, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109 ͒ G. G. Faziod Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 ͒ J. R. Houcke Astronomy Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-6801 ͒ F. J. Lowf Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85721 ͒ G. H. Riekeg Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85721 ͒ ͒ B. T. Soiferh and D. A. Levinei Spitzer Science Center, MC 220-6, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91125 ͒ E. A. Romanaj Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, MS 264-767, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109 ͑Received 2 June 2006; accepted 17 September 2006; published online 30 January 2007͒ The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Spitzer Space Telescope ͑formerly the Space Infrared Telescope Facility͒ is the fourth and final facility in the Great Observatories Program, joining Hubble Space Telescope ͑1990͒, the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory ͑1991–2000͒, and the Chandra X-Ray Observatory ͑1999͒. Spitzer, with a sensitivity that is almost three orders of magnitude greater than that of any previous ground-based and space-based infrared observatory, is expected to revolutionize our understanding of the creation of the universe, the formation and evolution of primitive galaxies, the origin of stars and planets, and the chemical evolution of the universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Herschel Space Observatory: Opening New Windows on the Universe
    The Herschel Space Observatory: Opening New Windows on the Universe William B. Latter Project Scientist and Task Lead for the NASA Herschel Science Center Herschel Space Observatory Carrying on Sir William’s Legacy • Herschel is an ESA Cornerstone mission, equivalent to a NASA Great Observatory in scientific and programmatic scope. • Herschel will be the largest single element space telescope for astronomical use launched to date. • Herschel will be the first long-duration, space-based observatory to open up the spectral window between 200 and 700 microns. • Herschel will be the only infrared/submillimeter space observatory to fill the gap between Spitzer and JWST. • Herschel will carry out important Spitzer follow-up. 2 1 Herschel in a nutshell • ESA Cornerstone Observatory instruments ‘nationally’ funded, int’l - NASA, CSA, Poland – collaboration ~1/3 guaranteed time, ~2/3 open time • FIR/Submm (57 - 670 µm) space facility large (3.5 m), low emissivity (< 4%), passively cooled (< 90 K) telescope 3 focal plane science instruments ≥3 years routine operational lifetime full spectral access low and stable background • Unique and complementary for λ < 200 µm larger aperture than cryogenically cooled telescopes (IRAS, ISO, Spitzer, Astro-F,…) more observing time than balloon- and/or air-borne instruments larger field of view than interferometers 3 4 2 Spatial Resolution: Spitzer vs. Herschel Spitzer Herschel Herschel offers same spatial resolution as Spitzer at ~4 times the wavelength 5 More about Herschel HIFI - Heterodyne Instrument for the Far- Infrared PI: T. de Grauuw, SRON, Groningen, The Netherlands Spectroscopy with 5 or 6 receiver bands 480 -1250 GHz and 1410-1910 GHz, λ/Δλ up to 107 (625-240 µm and 213-157 µm) SPIRE - Spectral and Photometric Imaging Receiver PI: M.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaianir Combining Optical and Near-Infra-Red (NIR) Capabilities with Time-Delay-Integration (TDI) Sensors for a Future Gaia-Like Mission
    Proposal title: GaiaNIR Combining optical and Near-Infra-Red (NIR) capabilities with Time-Delay-Integration (TDI) sensors for a future Gaia-like mission. PI: Dr. David Hobbs, Lund Observatory, Box 43, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden. Email: [email protected]. Tel.: +46-46-22 21573 Core team members: The following minimum team is needed to initiate the project. D. Hobbs Lund Observatory, Sweden. A. Brown Leiden Observatory, Holland. A. Mora Aurora Technology B.V., Spain. C. Crowley HE Space Operations B.V., Spain. N. Hambly University of Edinburgh, UK. J. Portell Institut de Ciències del Cosmos, ICCUB-IEEC, Spain. C. Fabricius Institut de Ciències del Cosmos, ICCUB-IEEC, Spain. M. Davidson University of Edinburgh, UK. Proposal writers: See Appendix A. Other supporting scientists: See Appendix B and Appendix C. Senior science advisors: E. Høg Copenhagen University (Retired), Denmark. L. Lindegren Lund Observatory, Sweden. C. Jordi Institut de Ciències del Cosmos, ICCUB-IEEC, Spain. S. Klioner Lohrmann Observatory, Germany. F. Mignard Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, France. arXiv:1609.07325v2 [astro-ph.IM] 22 May 2020 Fig. 1: Left is an IR image from the Two Micron All-Sky Survey (image G. Kopan, R. Hurt) while on the right an artist’s concept of the Gaia mission superimposed on an optical image, (Image ESA). Images not to scale. 1 1. Executive summary ESA recently called for new “Science Ideas” to be investigated in terms of feasibility and technological developments – for tech- nologies not yet sufficiently mature. These ideas may in the future become candidates for M or L class missions within the ESA Science Program.
    [Show full text]
  • EUCLID Mission Assessment Study
    EUCLID Mission Assessment Study Executive Summary ESA Contract. No. 5856/08/F/VS September 2009 EUCLID– Mapping the Dark Universe EUCLID is a mission to study geometry and nature of the dark universe. It is a medium-class mission candidate within ESA's Cosmic Vision 2015– 2025 Plan for launch around 2017. EUCLID has been derived by ESA from DUNE and SPACE, two complementary Cosmic Vision proposals addressing questions on the origin and the constitution of the Universe. 70% Dark Energy The observational methods applied by EUCLID are shape and redshift measure- ments of galaxies and clusters of galaxies. To 4% Baryonic Matter this end EUCLID is equipped with 3 scientific instruments: 26% Dark Matter • Visible Imager (VIS) • Near-Infrared Photometer (NIP) • Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIS) The EUCLID Mission Assessment Study is the industrial part of the EUCLID assessment phase. The study has been performed by Astrium from September 2008 to September 2009 and is intended for space segment definition and programmatic evaluation. The prime responsibility is with Astrium GmbH (Friedrichshafen, Germany) with support from Astrium SAS (Toulouse, France) and Astrium Ltd (Stevenage, UK). EUCLID Mission EUCLID shall observe 20.000 deg2 of the extragalactic sky at galactic latitudes |b|>30 deg. The sky is sampled in step & b>30° stare mode with instantaneous fields of about 0.5 deg2 . Nominally a strip of about 20 deg in latitude is scanned per day (corresponding to about 1 deg in longitude). galactic plane step 1 b<30° step 2 step 3 The sky is nominally observed along great circles in planes perpendicular to the Sun- spacecraft axis (SAA=0).
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Defence Activities Beyond NASA and ESA
    Planetary Defence Activities Beyond NASA and ESA Brent W. Barbee 1. Introduction The collision of a significant asteroid or comet with Earth represents a singular natural disaster for a myriad of reasons, including: its extraterrestrial origin; the fact that it is perhaps the only natural disaster that is preventable in many cases, given sufficient preparation and warning; its scope, which ranges from damaging a city to an extinction-level event; and the duality of asteroids and comets themselves---they are grave potential threats, but are also tantalising scientific clues to our ancient past and resources with which we may one day build a prosperous spacefaring future. Accordingly, the problems of developing the means to interact with asteroids and comets for purposes of defence, scientific study, exploration, and resource utilisation have grown in importance over the past several decades. Since the 1980s, more and more asteroids and comets (especially the former) have been discovered, radically changing our picture of the solar system. At the beginning of the year 1980, approximately 9,000 asteroids were known to exist. By the beginning of 2001, that number had risen to approximately 125,000 thanks to the Earth-based telescopic survey efforts of the era, particularly the emergence of modern automated telescopic search systems, pioneered by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT’s) LINEAR system in the mid-to-late 1990s.1 Today, in late 2019, about 840,000 asteroids have been discovered,2 with more and more being found every week, month, and year. Of those, approximately 21,400 are categorised as near-Earth asteroids (NEAs), 2,000 of which are categorised as Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs)3 and 2,749 of which are categorised as potentially accessible.4 The hazards posed to us by asteroids affect people everywhere around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations from Orbiting Platforms 219
    Dotto et al.: Observations from Orbiting Platforms 219 Observations from Orbiting Platforms E. Dotto Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino M. A. Barucci Observatoire de Paris T. G. Müller Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik and ISO Data Centre A. D. Storrs Towson University P. Tanga Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino and Observatoire de Nice Orbiting platforms provide the opportunity to observe asteroids without limitation by Earth’s atmosphere. Several Earth-orbiting observatories have been successfully operated in the last decade, obtaining unique results on asteroid physical properties. These include the high-resolu- tion mapping of the surface of 4 Vesta and the first spectra of asteroids in the far-infrared wave- length range. In the near future other space platforms and orbiting observatories are planned. Some of them are particularly promising for asteroid science and should considerably improve our knowledge of the dynamical and physical properties of asteroids. 1. INTRODUCTION 1800 asteroids. The results have been widely presented and discussed in the IRAS Minor Planet Survey (Tedesco et al., In the last few decades the use of space platforms has 1992) and the Supplemental IRAS Minor Planet Survey opened up new frontiers in the study of physical properties (Tedesco et al., 2002). This survey has been very important of asteroids by overcoming the limits imposed by Earth’s in the new assessment of the asteroid population: The aster- atmosphere and taking advantage of the use of new tech- oid taxonomy by Barucci et al. (1987), its recent extension nologies. (Fulchignoni et al., 2000), and an extended study of the size Earth-orbiting satellites have the advantage of observing distribution of main-belt asteroids (Cellino et al., 1991) are out of the terrestrial atmosphere; this allows them to be in just a few examples of the impact factor of this survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Broadband X-Ray and Multiwavelength Study of Active Galactic Nuclei in Local 57 Ultra/Luminous Infrared Galaxies Observed with Nustar And/Or Swift/BAT
    Draft version July 26, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX631 Comprehensive Broadband X-ray and Multiwavelength Study of Active Galactic Nuclei in Local 57 Ultra/luminous Infrared Galaxies Observed with NuSTAR and/or Swift/BAT Satoshi Yamada ,1 Yoshihiro Ueda ,1 Atsushi Tanimoto ,2 Masatoshi Imanishi ,3, 4 Yoshiki Toba ,1, 5 Claudio Ricci ,6, 7, 8 and George C. Privon 9 1Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-Oiwake-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan 2Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 3National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 4Department of Astronomical Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 5Research Center for Space and Cosmic Evolution, Ehime University, 2-5 Bunkyo-cho, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8577, Japan 6N´ucleo de Astronom´ıade la Facultad de Ingenier´ıa,Universidad Diego Portales, Av. Ej´ercito Libertador 441, Santiago, Chile 7Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China 8George Mason University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, MS 3F3, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA 9National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Rd, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA (Received April 13, 2021; Revised June 11, 2021; Accepted Jul, 2021) ABSTRACT We perform a systematic X-ray spectroscopic analysis of 57 local ultra/luminous infrared galaxy systems (containing 84 individual galaxies) observed with Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array and/or Swift/BAT. Combining soft X-ray data obtained with Chandra, XMM-Newton, Suzaku and/or Swift/XRT, we identify 40 hard (>10 keV) X-ray detected active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and con- strain their torus parameters with the X-ray clumpy torus model XCLUMPY (Tanimoto et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Debris: a Chronology
    NASA/TP-1999-208856 January 1999 Orbital Debris: A Chronology David S. F. Portree Houston, Texas Joseph P. Loftus, Jr Lwldon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas David S. F. Portree is a freelance writer working in Houston_ Texas Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ iv Preface ........................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... vii Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ ix The Chronology ............................................................................................................. 1 1961 ......................................................................................................................... 4 1962 ......................................................................................................................... 5 963 ......................................................................................................................... 5 964 ......................................................................................................................... 6 965 ......................................................................................................................... 6 966 ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Variable and Broad Iron Lines Around Black Holes
    Variable and Broad Iron Lines around Black Holes ESAC/ XMM-Newton Science Operations Center Workshop 26 – 28 June, 2006 “Broad” Iron Line ～20 years ago Cyg X-1 EXOSAT Barr et al. Tenma Kitamoto et al. broad narrow Gas Scintillation prop. Counter: best energy resolution at that time Rest frame @6.4 keV Iron K-line profile Newtonian near a black hole Special Relativity: Beaming and Fabian et al. 1989 Transverse Doppler General Relativity: Gravitational Redshift Disk Emissivity νobs/νem Fe K emission • Most prominent feature in X-ray spectrum of reprocessed (reflected) emission • Important diagnostics of illuminating source & illuminated matter • Sensitive probe of central region under extreme physical conditions • Potential of determining BH Mass & Spin [Fabian] [Matt] [Miniutti] ~10 yrs ago with ASCA K. Nandra Era of XMM-Newton, Chandra & Suzaku higher sensitivity and/or higher energy resolution • Presence of broad Fe lines confirmed and more are found • Also from Galactic BHBs • More complex spectral & time-variability features / properties discovered • Interpretations developed Relativistic Lines in Galactic BHs little affected by continuum model [Miller] Cyg X-1 (XMM) (JMM 02, 06) GRS 1915+105 (CXO) XTE J1550-564 (ASCA) (JMM 04) (JMM 04) GX 339-4 (CXO) (JMM 04) XTE J1650-500 (XMM) GRO J1655-40 (ASCA) (JMM 02) Broad Fe line in ~20 systems: [J.Miller] Is the relativistic broad Fe line robust? POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS • Narrow components • Blueshifted & redshifted lines [Cappi] • Compton reflection • High ionization / high column absorbers
    [Show full text]
  • Infrared Astronomical Satellite IRAS
    Infrared Astronomical Satellite IRAS Dr. Dusan Petrac 1 2 IRAS satellite 3 Collaboration IRAS mission was a collaboration between United States - NASA, Netherlands - Netherlands Agency for Aerospace Programmes (NIVR), and United Kingdom Science and Engineering Research Council - SERC. By ownership of satellite subsystems: NASA - optics, amplifying electronics, cryogenics, testing and launch. NIVR - satellite bus and processing electronics. SERC - mission operations and data acquisition. 4 General Major contractors: Ball Aerospace, Fokker Space and Hollandse Signaal. Launch date – 25 January, 1983 Launch site – SLC-2 West, Vandenberg AFB, CA Launch system – Delta 3910 Mass – 1083 kg Mission duration – 10 months 5 General cont. Type of orbit – sun-synchronous polar Orbit height – ~900 km Orbit period – ~100 minutes Current location – in orbit, deactivated Telescope style – Ritchey-Chretien Wavelength – infrared Mirror diameter – 0.57m Focal length – 5.5m 6 Following in IRAS footsteps Following spectacular successes of the IRAS mission, last few decades have seen several additional surveyors of our universe in infrared: Infrared Space Observatory - 1995 Spitzer Space Telescope - 2003 AKARI Space Telescope - 2006 Herschel Space Observatory (ESA) - April 2009 7 Mission design All-sky survey in four infrared bands 8 Mission design cont. IRAS mission design and survey strategy were optimized for maximally reliable detection of point sources. An all-sky survey was done at wavelengths ranging from 8 to 120 microns in four broadband photometric channels Channels were centered at 12, 25, 60 and 100 microns. Searches of rejected sources for moving objects led to discovery of three asteroids, six comets and a huge dust trail of comet Tempel 2. 9 Mission design cont.
    [Show full text]