Doctorat Paristech T H È S E L'école Nationale Supérieure D'arts Et Métiers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Doctorat Paristech T H È S E L'école Nationale Supérieure D'arts Et Métiers N°: 2009 ENAM XXXX 2016-ENAM-0003 École doctorale n° 432 : Science des Métiers de l’Ingénieur Doctorat ParisTech T H È S E pour obtenir le grade de docteur délivré par l’École Nationale Supérieure d'Arts et Métiers Spécialité “ Automatique ” présentée et soutenue publiquement par Ke WANG le 28 janvier 2016 Robot manipulator modeling for robust force control used in Friction Stir Welding (FSW) ~~~ Modélisation d’un robot manipulateur en vue de la commande robuste en force utilisé en soudage FSW Directeur de thèse : Gabriel ABBA Co-encadrement de la thèse : François LEONARD Jury M. Guillaume MOREL, Professeur, Université de Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI Président T M. Wolfgang SEEMANN, Professeur, Karlsruher Institute of Technology Rapporteur M. Stéphane CARO, Chargé de recherche, IRCCyN, CNRS Rapporteur H M. Gabriel ABBA, Professeur, LCFC, Université de Lorraine Examinateur M. François LEONARD, Maître de conférences, LCFC, Université de Lorraine Examinateur È M. Aurélien ROBINEAU, Ingénieur, Institut de Soudure Invité S E Arts et Métiers ParisTech - Centre de Metz Laboratoire de Conception Fabrication Commande (LCFC EA CNRS 4495) N°: 2009 ENAM XXXX CONTENTS Contents Acknowledgements 4 List of Figures 7 List of Tables 10 List of Abbreviations 12 I English Version 15 1 General Introduction and Literature Review 17 1.1 Research Background and Motivations . 17 1.2 Literature Review on Industrial Robot Manipulators . 18 1.2.1 History of Industrial Robot Manipulators . 18 1.2.2 Current Developments of Industrial Robots . 21 1.3 Literature Review on Modeling of Flexible Joint Robot Manipulators 23 1.4 Literature Review on Control of Flexible Joint Robots . 24 1.4.1 Singular Perturbation and Integral Manifold . 24 1.4.2 Feedback Linearization . 25 1.4.3 Cascaded System and Integral Backstepping . 26 1.4.4 PD Control . 28 1.4.5 Other Control Methods . 28 1.5 Dissertation Outline . 29 2 Modeling of Flexible Joint Robot Manipulators 31 2.1 Introduction . 31 2.2 Spatial Descriptions and Coordinate Transformations . 31 2.2.1 Descriptions of Positions, Orientations and Frames . 31 2.2.2 Homogeneous Transformations . 33 2.2.3 X-Y-Z fixed angles . 34 2.3 Robot Kinematics . 35 2.3.1 Modified Denavit-Hartenberg Convention . 35 2.3.2 Forward Kinematics: Direct Geometric Model . 36 2.3.3 Inverse Kinematics: Inverse Geometric Model . 39 2.3.4 Forward Instantaneous Kinematics: Direct Kinematic Model . 43 2.3.5 Inverse Instantaneous Kinematics: Inverse Kinematic Model . 44 1 CONTENTS 2.4 Robot Dynamics . 44 2.4.1 Dynamic Modeling of the Robot . 44 2.4.2 Flexibility Model . 46 2.4.3 Friction Model . 47 2.4.4 Introduction of SYMORO+ . 48 2.5 Conclusion . 48 3 Simplification of Robot Dynamic Model Using Interval Method 49 3.1 Introduction . 49 3.2 Interval Analysis . 51 3.2.1 Basic Definitions and Operations of Intervals . 51 3.2.2 Inclusion Functions and Overestimation . 52 3.3 Symbolic Robot Dynamic Model . 54 3.4 Simplification Using Interval Method . 55 3.4.1 Simplification Algorithm . 56 3.4.2 Example of Simplification of Component M44 . 58 3.4.3 Results of Simplified Model for Whole Workspace . 62 3.4.4 Error Analysis of Simplified Model for Whole Workspace . 63 3.4.5 Further Simplification and Results . 64 3.5 Case Study: Simplification on Three Different Test Trajectories . 65 3.5.1 Evaluation Indexes of Simplification . 66 3.5.2 Case I: Simplification on an Identification Trajectory . 67 3.5.3 Case II: Simplification on a Linear FSW Trajectory . 72 3.5.4 Case III: Simplification on a Circular FSW Trajectory . 77 3.5.5 Case IV: Torques Analysis in Robot Dynamic Equation . 81 3.6 Discussion on Usage of the Simplified Model . 83 3.7 Conclusion . 84 4 Dynamic Modeling and Identification of Robotic FSW Process 85 4.1 Introduction . 85 4.2 Description of the FSW Process . 87 4.3 Static Modeling of Process Forces in FSW . 89 4.4 Experimental Setup . 91 4.5 Calculation of Plunge Depth and Data Filtering . 95 4.5.1 Definition of Plunge Depth . 95 4.5.2 Three Methods for Calculating Plunge Depth . 96 4.5.3 Derivative of Plunge Depth and Data Filtering . 99 4.6 Linear Dynamic Modeling and Identification of Axial Force . 102 4.6.1 Linear Dynamic Model of Axial Force . 102 4.6.2 Least Squares Method and Error Analysis Method . 103 4.6.3 Results and Error Analysis of Identified Linear Model . 105 4.7 Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling and Identification of Axial Force . 109 4.7.1 Nonlinear Dynamic Model and Identification Method . 109 4.7.2 Results and Error Analysis of Identified Nonlinear Model . 111 4.8 Conclusion . 112 2 CONTENTS 5 Design of Robust Force Controller in Robotic FSW Process 115 5.1 Introduction . 115 5.2 Force Control of Robot Manipulator . 116 5.2.1 Basic Force Control Approaches . 116 5.2.2 Advanced Force Control Approaches . 118 5.3 Force Control Strategy and System Modeling . 118 5.3.1 Force Control Strategy . 118 5.3.2 System Modeling in Cartesian Space . 119 5.4 Parameter Identification of Displacement Model of Rigid Robot . 123 5.4.1 Identification using Transfer Function Estimation . 124 5.4.2 Identification using Process Model Estimation . 126 5.5 Design of Robust Force Controller . 128 5.5.1 Description of Entire Control System . 128 5.5.2 Specifying Desired Performance of Controller . 129 5.5.3 Designing Structure of Controller . 130 5.5.4 Calculating Parameters of the Controller . 132 5.5.5 Results of Force Controller Design . 134 5.6 Simulation of Robotic FSW Process . 135 5.6.1 KUKA Robot Controller and Trajectory Generator . 135 5.6.2 Dynamic Control of KUKA Robot . 136 5.6.3 Joint Motion Controller of the Simulator . 138 5.6.4 Establishment of Simulator for Robotic FSW Process . 141 5.6.5 Simulations and Results Analysis . 144 5.7 Vibration Analysis of Axial Force . 147 5.7.1 Identification of Experimental Axial Force Model . 147 5.7.2 Disturbance Model for Force Vibration and Simulation . 149 5.8 Conclusion . 152 6 General Conclusions and Perspectives 155 6.1 General Conclusions . 155 6.2 Perspectives . 158 II Résumé Étendu en Français 159 7 Résumé en Français: Modélisation d’un robot manipulateur en vue de la commande robuste en force utilisé en soudage FSW 161 7.1 Introduction générale et revue de littérature . 161 7.2 Modélisation des robots manipulateurs à articulations flexibles . 176 7.3 Simplification des modèles dynamiques des robots en utilisant la méth- ode d’intervalle . 182 7.4 Modélisation dynamique et identification du procédé de soudage FSW robotisé . 194 7.5 Conception d’un contrôleur robuste en force pendant le procédé de soudage FSW robotisé . 203 7.6 Conclusions générales et perspectives . 212 3 CONTENTS Bibliography 217 Appendix 229 A Supplementary Materials for Modeling of Robot 231 0 A.1 Homogeneous Transformation Matrix Tt . 231 A.2 Jacobian Matrix . 232 B Supplementary Materials for Model Simplification of Robot 235 B.1 Expression of Original Component M21 and Simplified component Ms21 of Inertia Matrix . 235 B.2 Tables for choosing appropriate kt and kp for linear and circular FSW trajectories . 236 C Supplementary Materials for Design of Force Controller 239 C.1 Detailed Computation Procedures for Single-Stage Controller . 239 D Technical Documents of the Robot 243 D.1 Technical Documents of the Robot . 243 4 Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge everyone who has helped me with my doctoral studies in any kind of way throughout the past three years. First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my thesis supervisor Dr. Gabriel Abba for providing me with the excellent opportunity to achieve this work. I am really grateful for his patient and continuous guidance, tremendous support and encouragement with my scientific research and professional development. His wisdom, enthusiasm and friendly attitude have inspired me to try my best to overcome any difficulty of my work. With the help of his extensive knowledge and countless suggestions, I have learned a great deal of things both for the research and life. I am also grateful for his invaluable help in proofreading the manuscript and assisting me in preparing my doctoral dissertation defense. I am also extremely grateful to my co-supervisor Dr. François Léonard for af- fording me technical guidance, generous support, flexible and valuable supervising time as well as his admirable patience and strong confidence on me. He has always been supportive and has provided me scientific knowledge and advice, insightful dis- cussions and helpful suggestions about my research. He has always encouraged me to think more independently and to get over the various obstacles. I have also ap- preciated the timely help that he has given to me, even in his vacation time, and the immense assistance in proofreading my manuscript and preparing my thesis defense. I would also like to thank all the members of my PhD thesis committee: Dr. Guillaume Morel, Dr. Wolfgang Seemann, Dr. Stéphane Caro and Mr. Aurélien Robineau for their support, encouragement, insightful questions and constructive suggestions. It is my great honor to have such a high level jury for my PhD defense. I want to give my special thanks to Dr. Wolfgang Seemann and Dr. Stéphane Caro for spending their precious time on reviewing my manuscript carefully and giving back their insightful comments and constructive advice to improve the quality of my thesis. Dr. Guillaume Morel has chaired the doctoral thesis defense and has given me some helpful comments on my research which inspired me a lot. I am also honored to be able to invite the FSW expert Mr.
Recommended publications
  • History of Robotics: Timeline
    History of Robotics: Timeline This history of robotics is intertwined with the histories of technology, science and the basic principle of progress. Technology used in computing, electricity, even pneumatics and hydraulics can all be considered a part of the history of robotics. The timeline presented is therefore far from complete. Robotics currently represents one of mankind’s greatest accomplishments and is the single greatest attempt of mankind to produce an artificial, sentient being. It is only in recent years that manufacturers are making robotics increasingly available and attainable to the general public. The focus of this timeline is to provide the reader with a general overview of robotics (with a focus more on mobile robots) and to give an appreciation for the inventors and innovators in this field who have helped robotics to become what it is today. RobotShop Distribution Inc., 2008 www.robotshop.ca www.robotshop.us Greek Times Some historians affirm that Talos, a giant creature written about in ancient greek literature, was a creature (either a man or a bull) made of bronze, given by Zeus to Europa. [6] According to one version of the myths he was created in Sardinia by Hephaestus on Zeus' command, who gave him to the Cretan king Minos. In another version Talos came to Crete with Zeus to watch over his love Europa, and Minos received him as a gift from her. There are suppositions that his name Talos in the old Cretan language meant the "Sun" and that Zeus was known in Crete by the similar name of Zeus Tallaios.
    [Show full text]
  • Ph. D. Thesis Stable Locomotion of Humanoid Robots Based
    Ph. D. Thesis Stable locomotion of humanoid robots based on mass concentrated model Author: Mario Ricardo Arbul´uSaavedra Director: Carlos Balaguer Bernaldo de Quiros, Ph. D. Department of System and Automation Engineering Legan´es, October 2008 i Ph. D. Thesis Stable locomotion of humanoid robots based on mass concentrated model Author: Mario Ricardo Arbul´uSaavedra Director: Carlos Balaguer Bernaldo de Quiros, Ph. D. Signature of the board: Signature President Vocal Vocal Vocal Secretary Rating: Legan´es, de de Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 HistoryofRobots........................... 2 1.1.1 Industrialrobotsstory. 2 1.1.2 Servicerobots......................... 4 1.1.3 Science fiction and robots currently . 10 1.2 Walkingrobots ............................ 10 1.2.1 Outline ............................ 10 1.2.2 Themes of legged robots . 13 1.2.3 Alternative mechanisms of locomotion: Wheeled robots, tracked robots, active cords . 15 1.3 Why study legged machines? . 20 1.4 What control mechanisms do humans and animals use? . 25 1.5 What are problems of biped control? . 27 1.6 Features and applications of humanoid robots with biped loco- motion................................. 29 1.7 Objectives............................... 30 1.8 Thesiscontents ............................ 33 2 Humanoid robots 35 2.1 Human evolution to biped locomotion, intelligence and bipedalism 36 2.2 Types of researches on humanoid robots . 37 2.3 Main humanoid robot research projects . 38 2.3.1 The Humanoid Robot at Waseda University . 38 2.3.2 Hondarobots......................... 47 2.3.3 TheHRPproject....................... 51 2.4 Other humanoids . 54 2.4.1 The Johnnie project . 54 2.4.2 The Robonaut project . 55 2.4.3 The COG project .
    [Show full text]
  • Robot Control and Programming: Class Notes Dr
    NAVARRA UNIVERSITY UPPER ENGINEERING SCHOOL San Sebastian´ Robot Control and Programming: Class notes Dr. Emilio Jose´ Sanchez´ Tapia August, 2010 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra 987‐84‐8081‐293‐1 ii Viaje a ’Agra de Cimientos’ Era yo todav´ıa un estudiante de doctorado cuando cayo´ en mis manos una tesis de la cual me llamo´ especialmente la atencion´ su cap´ıtulo de agradecimientos. Bueno, realmente la tesis no contaba con un cap´ıtulo de ’agradecimientos’ sino mas´ bien con un cap´ıtulo alternativo titulado ’viaje a Agra de Cimientos’. En dicho capitulo, el ahora ya doctor redacto´ un pequeno˜ cuento epico´ inventado por el´ mismo. Esta pequena˜ historia relataba las aventuras de un caballero, al mas´ puro estilo ’Tolkiano’, que cabalgaba en busca de un pueblo recondito.´ Ya os podeis´ imaginar que dicho caballero, no era otro sino el´ mismo, y que su viaje era mas´ bien una odisea en la cual tuvo que superar mil y una pruebas hasta conseguir su objetivo, llegar a Agra de Cimientos (terminar su tesis). Solo´ deciros que para cada una de esas pruebas tuvo la suerte de encontrar a una mano amiga que le ayudara. En mi caso, no voy a presentarte una tesis, sino los apuntes de la asignatura ”Robot Control and Programming´´ que se imparte en ingles.´ Aunque yo no tengo tanta imaginacion´ como la de aquel doctorando para poder contaros una historia, s´ı que he tenido la suerte de encontrar a muchas personas que me han ayudado en mi viaje hacia ’Agra de Cimientos’. Y eso es, amigo lector, al abrir estas notas de clase vas a ser testigo del final de un viaje que he realizado de la mano de mucha gente que de alguna forma u otra han contribuido en su mejora.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Robotics
    A Brief History of Robotics ~ 350 B.C The brilliant Greek mathematician, Archytas ('ahr 'ky tuhs') of Tarentum builds a mechanical bird dubbed "the Pigeon" that is propelled by steam. It serves as one of history’s earliest studies of flight, not to mention probably the first model airplane. ~ 322 B.C. The Greek philosopher Aristotle writes... “If every tool, when ordered, or even of its own accord, could do the work that befits it... then there would be no need either of apprentices for the master workers or of slaves for the lords.” ...hinting how nice it would be to have a few robots around. ~ 200 B.C. The Greek inventor and physicist Ctesibus ('ti sib ee uhs') of Alexandria designs water clocks that have movable figures on them. Water clocks are a big breakthrough for timepieces. Up until then the Greeks used hour glasses that had to be turned over after all the sand ran through. Ctesibus' invention changed this because it measured time as a result of the force of water falling through it at a constant rate. In general, the Greeks were fascinated with automata of all kinds, often using them in theater productions and religious ceremonies. 1495 Leonardo DaVinci designs a mechanical device that looks like an armored knight. The mechanisms inside "Leonardo's robot" are designed to make the knight move as if there was a real person inside. Inventors in medieval times often built machines like "Leonardo's robot" to amuse royalty. 1738 Jacques de Vaucanson begins building automata in Grenoble, France. He builds three in all.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of the Link and Joint Flexibilities on the Dynamic Chracteristics of Robot
    DOKUZ EYLÜL UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES MECHATRONIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT EFFECTS OF THE LINK AND JOINT FLEXIBILITIES ON THE DYNAMIC CHRACTERISTICS OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS by Arjan I. SADEQ October, 2011 İZMİR 1 2 EFFECTS OF THE LINK AND JOINT FLEXIBILITIES ON THE DYNAMIC CHRACTERISTICS OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS A Thesis Submitted to the Mechatronic Engineering Department of Dokuz Eylül University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in Mechatronic Engineering by Arjan I. SADEQ October, 2011 İZMİR 2 iii AKNOWLEDGMENTS During my graduate study I would like to thank the person who always show me the right way and expand my horizon by teaching me different view points Assoc. Prof. Dr. Zeki KIRAL, and during the lessons I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Erol UYAR who always trust and support me. Thank you to all my friends who supported me during my studies. And finally I would like to thank my family because without them I will never have done this. Arjan I. SADEQ iii iv EFFECTS OF THE LINK AND JOINT FLEXIBILITIES ON THE DYNAMIC CHRACTERISTICS OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS ABSTRACT Robots have a very significant position among the production tools in today’s technology. The robots which execute the transactions such as mounting, painting, transportation, blanking, welding, section feeding, peening, supervision and drilling in the sectors such as automotive, machine production, textile, electronic, chemistry, food and medicine. Robots are preferred in industry and service sectors for the features such as sensitive production, being calculable, acquiring rapid and high quality products, existing in the conditions in which human cannot work and saving from the labor force, although their usage areas are different.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Some Examples of Robots in Agriculture
    ANNALS OF THE ORADEA UNIVERSITY Fascicle of Management and Technological Engineering ISSUE #2, SEPTEMBER 2013, http://www.imtuoradea.ro/auo.fmte/ DEVELOPMENT AND SOME EXAMPLES OF ROBOTS IN AGRICULTURE David JOVOVIĆ High Economic School of Professional Studies Peć in Leposavić, SERBIA, e-mail: [email protected] new situations and solve new problems. This type of Abstract—The robot is an electro-mechanical device or intelligence is called artificial intelligence (Artificial system that is able to autonomously, according to the program, Intelligence) and is a special branch of science. or under the control of a man running, most dangerous, The word robotics was derived from the word robot, difficult and laborious, and persevering and precise tasks. which was introduced to the public by the Czech writer They are used in all areas of human activity. The paper Karel Capek in his play RUR (Rossum's Universal describes the historical development of robots, and their Robots's) which premiered 1921st year (figure 1). The application in agriculture. word robot comes from the Czech word slave, robot, which is used to indicate a hard, hard labor. Keywords—information and communication technology The robot is an electro-mechanical device or system (ICT), artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, agriculture. that is able to autonomously, according to the program, or under the control of a man running, most dangerous, I. INTRODUCTION difficult and laborious, and persevering and precise OBOTICS Robotics is a discipline or branch of tasks. Examples are.: Collecting nuclear waste, Rtechnology that deals with the design, construction, dismantling mines, working in mines and quarries, manufacture and application of robots and computer engines and chassis assembly automobile, welding of systems used for their control, sensory feedback, and complex machine parts and equipment, sorting parts of information processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Near .Ea-St University Faculity of Engineering
    NEAR .EA-ST UNIVERSITY FACULITY OF ENGINEERING 1988 G'RADUATION PROJECT SENSORS USED IN ROBOTICS EE 400 NAME: QAMAR ARIF KHOKHER STUDENT NO: 971286 DEPARTMENT: ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING SUBMITTED TO: Prof .• Dr. KHALIL ISMAILOV 1.1 What is Robot 1 1.2 History Of Robotics 1 1.3 Work Of Robot 2 1.4 Uses for Robots 2 1.5 Impact ofRobots 3 1. 6 Classification OfRobots 3 1.6.0 Robotic-Like Devices 3 1.6.1Prostheses 3 1.6.2Exoskeleton 4 1.6.3 Telecherics 4 1.6.4Locomotive Mechnism 4 1.7 Classification by Coordinate System 4 1.7.1 Cylindrical coordinate robots 5 1.7.2 Spherical coordinate robots 5 1.7.3 Jointed arm robots _6 1. 7.3 a. .Pure Spherical. 6 l.7.3b ..Parallelogram Jointed 7 1. 7.3 c . Jointed Cylindrical 8 1.7.4 Cartesian coordinate robots 9 1. 7. 4a. Cantilevered Cartesian. 10 l.7.4b. Gantry-Style Cartesian. 10 1.8 Major Components Of.Roboıs Jl 1.8.1 Sensor 11 1.8.2 Manipulator 12 1.8.3 Controller 12 1. 8 .4 End Effector 13 1.8.5 Arm 13 1.8.6 Drive 14 Conclusion 14 2.1 INTRODUCTION 15 2.2 NONOPTICAL-POSITION SENSORS 15 2.2.1 Potentiometers 15 2.3 SYNCHRO SYSTEM 17 2.3.1 Resolvers 20 2.3.2 The Motometics Resolver 23 11 2.4 The Inductosyn ·-:..: 25 2.5 Linear Variable Differential Transformers 28 2. 6 Optical Postion Sensors 29 2.6. 1 Opto-lnterrupters 29 2.6.2 Optical Encoders 32 2.6.3 Rotary absolute encoders 32 2.6.4 Absolute encoders usually .cn1l.S.L51.ofıhre~Jnajor elements 33 2.6.5 Optical incremental encoders 34 2.7 Velocity Sensors 4D 2.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights from Digital Computer Museum Report 1/1982
    file:////cray/Shared/COLLECTIONS/Curator/mondo_museum_report.htm Return to List of Reports Highlights from Digital Computer Museum Report 1/1982 Contents of Highlights ● Back of Front Cover ● The Director's Letter ● Unusual Photos ● LECTURE SERIES Back of Front Cover The Digital Computer Museum is an independent, non-profit, charitable foundation. It is the world's only institution dedicated to the industry-wide preservation of information processing devices and documentation. It interprets computer history through exhibits, publications, videotapes, lectures, educational programs, excursions, and special events. Hours and Services The Digital Computer Museum is open to the public Sunday through Friday, 1:00 pm to 6:00 pm. There is no charge for admission. The Digital Computer Museum Lecture Series Lectures focus on benchmarks in computing history and are held six times a year. All lectures are videotaped and archived for scholarly use. Gallery talks by computer historians, staff members and docents are offered every Wednesday at 4:00 and Sunday at 3:00. Guided group tours are available by appointment only. Books, posters, postcards, and other items related to the history of computing are available for sale at the Museum Store. The Museum's lecture hall and reception facilities are available for rent on a prearranged basis. For information call 617-467-4443. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Charles Bachman C. Gordon Bell Gwen Bell Harvey C. Cragon Robert Everett C. Lester Hogan Theodore G. Johnson Andrew C. Knowles, III John Lacey Pat McGovern George Michael Robert N. Noyce Kenneth H. Olsen Brian Randell Edward A. Schwartz Michael Spock Erwin O. Tomash Senator Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Robot and Robotics a Few Questions
    INTRODUCTION TO ROBOT AND ROBOTICS A FEW QUESTIONS What is a robot? What is robotics? Why should we study robotics? What is motivation behind robotics? How can we give instruction to a robot that you perform this particular task? What are the different types of robots, we generally use? What are the possible applications of robots? Can a human being be replaced by a robot?, DEFINITIONS The term: robot has come from the Czech word: robota, which means the forced or the slave laborer. The term robot was introduced in the year 1921 by Karel Capek. He was a Czech playwright who wrote one drama named “Rossum’s Universal Robot “(R.U.R). In that drama, he introduced a term: robota, that is, the robot. According to him, the robot is a machine similar to a human being in physical appearance. ROBOT HAS BEEN DEFINED AS FOLLOWS: According to the Oxford English Dictionary, robot is a machine capable of carrying out a complex series of actions automatically, especially one programmable by a computer, so this is nothing but an automatic machine. According to ISO, that is, International Organization for Standardization, the robot has been defined as follows: the robot is an automatically controlled, reprogrammable, multifunctional manipulator, programmable in three or more axes, which can be either fixed in place or mobile for use in industrial automation applications. According to Robot Institute of America: Robot is a reprogrammable multi-functional manipulator designed to move materials, parts, tools or specialized devices through variable programmed motions for the performance of a variety of tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Unimate to the Delta Robot: the Early Decades of Industrial Robotics
    From the Unimate to the Delta robot: the early decades of Industrial Robotics A. Gasparetto and L. Scalera Polytechnic Department of Engineering and Architecture – University of Udine, Udine, Italy, e-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] Abstract . In this paper, the early decades of the history of industrial robots (from the 1950’s to the be- ginning of the 1990’s, approximately) will be described. The history of industrial robotics can be con- sidered starting with Unimate, the first industrial robot designed and built by Devol and Engelberger. The subsequent evolutions of industrial robotics are described in the manuscript, taking into account both the technical and the economic point of view, until the beginning of the 1990’s, when new kine- matic structures (parallel robots) appeared, allowing high-speed operations. Key words: Industrial robots, history, Unimate, Stanford Arm, Delta robot 1 Introduction Since ancient times, the humanity conceived the idea to design and to build some kind of beings, or devices, which could substitute men in heavy or repetitive work. Such beings, called automata , date back to the Greek-Hellenistic age and have been conceived by several civilizations throughout the centuries. A historical per- spective of Robotics may be found in [1] and [2], while a brief history of automata and robots, from ancient times up to the Industrial Revolution, can be found in [3]. From the Industrial Revolution on, some forms of automatization took place in the industrial environment; however, it is only in the 1950’s that what is known as “industrial robotics” started.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Robotics
    1116 Chapter 54 Medical Robotics Ahmad Taher Azar Misr University for Science & Technology, Egypt M. Sam Eljamel The University of Dundee, UK ABSTRACT Medical robotics is an interdisciplinary field that focuses on developing electromechanical devices for clinical applications. The goal of this field is to enable new medical techniques by providing new ca- pabilities to the physician or by providing assistance during surgical procedures. Medical robotics is a relatively young field, as the first recorded medical application occurred in 1985 for a brain biopsy. It has tremendous potential for improving the precision and capabilities of physicians when performing surgical procedures, and it is believed that the field will continue to grow as improved systems become available. This chapter offers a comprehensive overview about medical robotics field and its applica- tions. It begins with an introduction to robotics, followed by a historical review of their use in medicine. Clinical applications in several different medical specialties are discusssed. The chapter concludes with a discussion of technology challenges and areas for future research. INTRODUCTION which was released in 1927. A Few years later, in 1959, John McCarthy and Marvin Minsky The word “robot” originated from a 1922 play established the Artificial Intelligence lab at the called “Rossum’s Universal Robots (R.U.R.)” by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Karel Capek (Capek 2001). The play was about a The first modern robotic hand was created by future in which all workers are automatons, who Heinrich Erst in 1961. The first industrial robot then revolt when they acquire souls. This idea was invented in 1962 and named as ‘Unimate’.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestones in Robotic Colorectal Surgery Development: an Historical Overview
    Genova et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:2 Mini-invasive Surgery DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2019.30 Review Open Access Milestones in robotic colorectal surgery development: an historical overview Pietro Genova1, Gianni Pantuso1, Solafah Abdalla2, Riccardo Memeo3, Federica Gaiani4, Paschalis Gavriilidis5, Nicola de’Angelis6 1Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Paolo Giaccone University Hospital, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo (PA), Italy. 2Department of Digestive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Bicêtre University Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Sud, 78 Rue du Général Leclerc, Le Kremlin Bicêtre 94275, France. 3Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Institute of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Bari, 70124 Bari (BA) Italy. 4Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, PR Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, PR IT-43124, Italy. 5Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK. 6Department of Digestive and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris- Est Créteil (UPEC), 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Créteil 94010, France. Correspondence to: Dr. Pietro Genova, Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Paolo Giaccone University Hospital, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129,
    [Show full text]