2020 Freshwater Fishing Digest Pages 16-33
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Prepared in Cooperation with the Trenton, New Jersey August 1982
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DRAINAGE AREAS IN NEW JERSEY: DELAWARE RIVER BASIN AND STREAMS TRIBUTARY TO DELAWARE BAY By Anthony J. Velnich OPEN-FILE REPORT 82-572 Prepared in cooperation with the UNITED STATES ARMY, CORPS OF ENGINEERS, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT and the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Trenton, New Jersey August 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information write to District Chief, Water Resources Division U.S. Geological Survey Room 430, Federal Building 402 East State Street Trenton, New Jersey 08608 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction--- - ---- -- --- ---- -- - - -- -- 1 Determination of drainage areas 3 Explanation of tabular data- 3 References cited 5 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing location of Delaware River basin and Delaware Bay drainage divides in New Jersey 2 TABLES Table 1. Drainage areas at stream mouths in New Jersey, in the Delaware River basin, including tributaries to Delaware Bay 6 2.--Drainage areas at selected sites on New Jersey streams tributary to, and including the Delaware River- 15 3. Drainage areas at selected sites on New Jersey streams tributary to, and including the Delaware Bay 41 FACTORS FOR CONVERTING INCH-POUND UNITS TO INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM UNITS (SI) For those readers who may prefer to use the International System (SI) units rather than inch-pound units, the conversion factors for the terms used in this report are listed below: Multiply inch-pound unit By To obtain SI unit feet (ft) 0.3048 meters (m) miles (mi) 1 .609 kilometers (km) square miles 2.590 square kilometers (mi 2 ) (km 2 ) II ABSTRACT Drainage areas of New Jersey streams tributary to the Delaware River and Delaware Bay are listed for over 1,100 sites. -
92 Passaic River Basin 01387000 Wanaque River at Wanaque, Nj
92 PASSAIC RIVER BASIN 01387000 WANAQUE RIVER AT WANAQUE, NJ LOCATION.--Lat 41°02'39", long 74°17'35", Passaic County, Hydrologic Unit 02030103, on left bank 750 ft downstream from Raymond Dam in Wanaque, and 50 ft upstream from bridge on County Route 511 (Ringwood Avenue). DRAINAGE AREA.--90.4 mi2, considered as 94 mi2 Oct. 1, 1928 to Sept. 30, 1934. PERIOD OF RECORD.--December 1903 to December 1905 (gage heights only), September 1912 to April 1915, May 1919 to current year. GAGE.--Water-stage recorder and concrete control. Datum of gage is 210.00 ft above NGVD of 1929(levels from New Jersey Geological Survey bench mark). Dec. 16, 1903, to Dec. 31, 1905, nonrecording gage on highway bridge at site 50 ft downstream at different datum. Sept. 15, 1912, to Apr. 1, 1922, nonrecording gage at site 200 ft downstream from present concrete control at different datum. Apr. 1, 1922 to Mar. 14, 1931, water-stage recorder at site 400 ft downstream from present concrete control at present datum. REMARKS.--Records good, except for estimated daily discharges which are fair. Flow regulated by Greenwood Lake 11 mi above station, since October 1987 by Monksville Reservoir just upstream from Wanaque Reservoir, and since 1928 by Wanaque Reservoir (see Passaic River basin, reservoirs in). North Jersey District Water Supply Commission diverts water for municipal supply from Wanaque Reservoir. Water is diverted to Wanaque Reservoir from Posts Brook at Wanaque and from Ramapo River at Pompton Lakes (see Passaic River basin, diversions). Water diverted into basin above gage from Upper Greenwood Lake (Hudson River basin) by North Jersey District Water Supply Commission since 1968. -
Greenwood Lake Water Level Management Plan
Greenwood Lake Water Level Management Plan A Collaborative Effort by Greenwood Lake Commission P.O Box 1110 Greenwood Lake, NY 11025 with New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Parks and Forestry State Park Service Ringwood State Park and New York Department of Environmental Conservation 2011 – 2031 Project Report No. 3 - 1 - GREENWOOD LAKE COMMISSION Ella Filippone, New Jersey Chair Steve Defeo, New York Chair Clinton Smith Kerry Kirk-Pflugh Eric Hastings Bill Olsen George Verno Pat Ferracane Karen Emrich Ben Winstanley Christine McAteer-Purdy, Secretary - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. I. INTRODUCTION 4 II. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 4 III. FACTS 5 A. CONSIDERATIONS 5 B. PROCEDURES 5 C. FACTS 6 IV. DRAWDOWN SCHEDULE – 20-Year Plan 6 V. OVERVIEW OF PROCDEURES FOR DRAWDOWN 6 VI. PRIMARY PARTNERS AND ROLES 8 A. THE ROLE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY 8 B. THE ROLE OF THE GREENWOOD LAKE COMMISSION 9 VII. OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED AND THEIR ROLES 10 A. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 11 B. NEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COUNCIL 11 C. NEW YORK DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 11 D. THE NORTH JERSEY DISTRICT WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION 12 E. PASSAIC COUNTY, NEW JERSEY AND ORANGE COUNTY, NEW YORK 12 F. TOWNSHIP OF WEST MILFORD, NEW JERSEY; VILLAGE OF GREENWOOD LAKE, NEW YORK; AND TOWN OF WARWICK, NEW YORK 13 G. UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 13 H. UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 13. VIII. DRAWDOWN PACKAGE CONTENTS 13 - 3 - I. Introduction This document is to be used as a Water Level Management Plan that is the source for directing future drawdowns of the waters which lie within Passaic County, New Jersey and Orange County, New York. -
The Nature of Boulder-Rich Deposits in the Upper Big Flat Brook Drainage, Sussex County, New Jersey
Middle States Geographer, 2009, 42: 33-43 THE NATURE OF BOULDER-RICH DEPOSITS IN THE UPPER BIG FLAT BROOK DRAINAGE, SUSSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Gregory A. Pope, Andrew J. Temples, Sean I. McLearie, Joanne C. Kornoelje, and Thomas J. Glynn Department of Earth & Environmental Studies Montclair State University 1 Normal Avenue Montclair, New Jersey, 07043 ABSTRACT: The upper reaches of the Big Flat Brook drainage, northwest of Kittatinny Mountain, contain a variety of glacial, pro-glacial, and periglacial deposits from the Late Quaternary. The area is dominated by recessional moraines and ubiquitous ground moraine, along with meltwater deposits, drumlins, and possible post- glacial periglacial features. We have identified a curious boulder-rich deposit in the vicinity of Lake Ocquittunk and Lake Wapalanne on upper Big Flat Brook. The area where these boulder deposits occur is mapped (1:24,000 surficial geology) as till. As mapped and observed, larger cobbles and boulders within the till are quartz-pebble conglomerate, quartzite, sandstone, and shale. The boulder-rich deposits differ from the typical till, however. Unlike the local till, which is more mixed in lithology, the boulder deposits are nearly exclusively Shawangunk conglomerate. The deposits are discontinuous, but appear to occur at a topographic level above the meltwater stream terraces. The boulders in the deposits lie partially embedded in soil, but are very closely spaced. The boulders range in size from ~20cm to over 100cm, and present a subrounded to subangular shape. There appears to be a fabric orientation of the boulders, NE-SW, with subsidiary orientations. As the boulder deposits differ from other mapped features in the area, we attempt to ascertain the origin for the deposits. -
Extensions of Remarks E1261 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS
September 17, 2018 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E1261 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS INTRODUCTION OF THE HUMAN With poor traceability and a lack of account- and his parent’s before him. They always re- TRAFFICKING AND IUU FISHING ability in the global seafood supply chain, we mained optimists and Mike is someone who ACT simply do not know where our seafood prod- from humble beginnings built an enviable leg- ucts come from or the conditions under which acy in our state. We can all take a lesson in HON. MADELEINE Z. BORDALLO they are harvested and processed. hard work, determination, and the entrepre- OF GUAM We must ensure that American fishermen neurial spirit from Mike Leprino. He is pre- IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES are never expected to compete against foreign ceded in death by his wife Joan, son Michael, seafood imports harvested with slave labor. Monday, September 17, 2018 sister Ange Testa, and brother Lou. Mike is Our bipartisan bill builds upon the Victims of survived by his wife Suzy, daughters; Laurie Ms. BORDALLO. Mr. Speaker, today I intro- Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of Leprino, Nancy Leprino, and Mary Leprino. He duce the Human Trafficking and IUU Fishing 2000 (Public Law 106–386), sponsored by is also survived by 6 grandchildren, 2 great- Act. I thank my colleagues, Congressman GRI- Congressman SMITH (R–NJ) from New Jersey. grandchildren, sister Marie Videtto and brother JALVA (D–AZ) and Congresswomen I urge all my colleagues to join us in co- Jim Leprino. Those of us who were fortunate RADEWAGEN (R–AS) and BONAMICI (D–OR), for sponsoring the Human Trafficking and IUU enough to know Mike and his indomitable opti- their support as original cosponsors. -
Ii. Natural Resources of the Greenwood Lake Watershed
II. NATURAL RESOURCES II. NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE GREENWOOD LAKE WATERSHED A. LAND RESOURCES Geologic History The Greenwood Lake Watershed is located in the Highlands Physiographic Province, as shown in Figure II.A-1. The Highlands are underlain by the oldest rocks in New Jersey. These Precambrian igneous and metamorphic rocks were formed between 1.3 billion and 750 million years ago by the melting and recrystallization of sedimentary rocks that were deeply buried, subjected to high pressure and temperature, and intensely deformed.1 The Precambrian rocks are interrupted by several elongate northeast-southwest trending belts of folded Paleozoic sedimentary rocks equivalent to the rocks of the Valley and Ridge Province. Figure II.A-1 - Physiographic Provinces of New Jersey 1 New Jersey Geological Survey, NJ Department of Environmental Protection. 1999. The Geology of New Jersey. II-1 II. NATURAL RESOURCES The Highlands ridges in New Jersey are a southward continuation of the Green or Taconic Mountains of Vermont and Massachusetts, the New England Upland of Connecticut, and the Hudson Highlands of New York.2 The ridges continue through Pennsylvania to the vicinity of Reading. This Reading Prong of the New England Physiographic Province plunges beneath the surface of younger rocks for a distance of about fifty miles southwest of Reading and reappears where the northern end of the Blue Ridge Mountains begins to rise above the surrounding country. The Blue Ridge Mountains of the Virginia Appalachians, the mountains of New England, and the Highlands of New Jersey and New York all have a similar geologic history and character. Topography The granites and gneisses of the Highlands are resistant to erosion and create a hilly upland dissected by the deep, steep-sided valleys of major streams.3 The Highlands can be characterized as broad high ridges composed of complex folded and faulted crystalline rocks and separated by deep narrow valleys.4 The topography follows the northeast-southwest trend of the geologic structure and rock formations. -
Project Report: Development of a TMDL for the Wanaque Reservoir
Project Report Development of a TMDL for the Wanaque Reservoir and Cumulative WLAs/LAs for the Passaic River Watershed Submitted To Division of Watershed Management NJ Department of Environmental Protection Trenton, New Jersey June 2005 Project Report Development of a TMDL for the Wanaque Reservoir and Cumulative WLAs/LAs for the Passaic River Watershed Submitted To Division of Watershed Management NJ Department of Environmental Protection Trenton, New Jersey June 2005 NAJARIAN ASSOCIATES Eatontown, New Jersey TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction............................................................................. 1-1 1.1 TMDL Basis.....................................................................................1-1 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................1-2 1.3 Approach.........................................................................................1-2 2. Reservoir Characteristics...................................................... 2-1 2.1 Reservoir’s Tributary Watershed ..................................................2-2 2.2 Diversion Intake Sites ....................................................................2-4 2.3 Previous Studies of Reservoir Water Quality ..............................2-8 3. River Simulation..................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Model Development .......................................................................3-1 3.2 Data Preparation.............................................................................3-3 -
Reconstruction of Streamflow Records in the Passaic and Hackensack River Basins, New Jersey and New York, Water Years 1993-96
RECONSTRUCTION OF STREAMFLOW RECORDS IN THE PASSAIC AND HACKENSACK RIVER BASINS, NEW JERSEY AND NEW YORK, WATER YEARS 1993-96 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4078 Prepared In cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION science for a changing world RECONSTRUCTION OF STREAMFLOW RECORDS IN THE PASSAIC AND HACKENSACK RIVER BASINS, NEW JERSEY AND NEW YORK, WATER YEARS 1993-96 By Donald A. Storck and John P. Nawyn U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4078 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION West Trenton, New Jersey 2001 USGS science fora changing world U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Mountain View Office Park Branch of Information Services 810 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 206 Box 25286 West Trenton, NJ 08628 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction................................................^ Purpose and scope................................................................................................................................2 Description of the study area ...............................................................................................................3 -
C O U N T Y O F S U S S
Mashipacong Island UDRV tribs Clove Brook (Delaware R) Rutgers Creek MONTAGUE tribs TOWNSHIP Shimers Brook UDRV tribs Forked (Dingmans Ferry Quarryville Brook/Parker to 206 bridg) Brook Brook Little Flat Clove Brook Wallkill Brook (Beerskill (Papakating River(stateline and above) Big Flat Ck) to Owens gage) Brook (above Forked Brook) WANTAGE Pochuck Little Flat TOWNSHIP Ck/Glenwood Lk Brook (Layton Wallkill & northern trib River(Owens gage to Beerskill) Papakating Ck to 41d13m30s) WB(abv 74d39m30s Big Flat side rd) Papakating Ck Brook (Kittle WB(blw 74d39m30s Rd to Forked Bk) Wallkill SANDYSTON side rd) R(41d13m30s to TOWNSHIP SUSSEX Martins Road) Little Flat Brook Black Creek (Confluence BOROUGH (below G. Gorge Big Flat Brook Wawayanda to Layton) Resort trib) (Confluence to Creek & Wykertown tribs Kittle Rd) tribs Dry (Papakating VERNON Brook Creek) Papakating TOWNSHIP Creek (below Papakating Ck Black Ck(above/incl Pellettown) (above Frankford G.Gorge Highland Flat Brook Plains) Resort trib) Lake/Wawayanda Wallkill Lake (Tillman Brook Culvers to Confluence) FRANKFORD Beaver R(Martins Rd to Creek TOWNSHIP Run Hamburg SW Bdy) Papakating HAMBURG BRANCHVILLE Pequannock Ck(Pellettown-Frankford BOROUGH BOROUGH R (above Plns) WALPACK Stockholm/Vernon Rd) TOWNSHIP LAFAYETTE Swartswood Flat Brook TOWNSHIP Pacock trib(41-06-06 Wallkill (below Tillman Lake Kemah Brook thru Lk Owassa) tribs Lafayette R(Hamburg SW Bdy Brook) Swamp to Ogdensburg) Paulins Kill tribs UDRV tribs Franklin (Dry Brook FRANKLIN (Flat Bk to Pond Creek to Rt 15) BOROUGH Dingmans -
2015 Surface Water Classification Assessments-Rivers and Streams
NJ DIVISION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Bureau of Freshwater Fisheries SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION - STREAMS 2015 Surface Water Classification Assessments Trout are useful bioindicators of stream health as excellent water quality and habitat are necessary for their survival and successful reproduction. In 1968, the Bureau of Freshwater Fisheries initiated the process of identifying and classifying New Jersey waters according to their suitability to support trout. Five years later, a classification system for New Jersey waters was developed. The Bureau’s classification system, although already in use by various programs within the Department, was formally recognized in 1981 under the state’s newly adopted Surface Water Quality Standards (SWQS). Today, waters of the state are classified according to their suitability to support trout. Lakes are classified on their ability to support trout year round, whereas streams are classified on the occurrence of natural reproduction and the presence or absence of trout and/or trout associated species (Hamilton and Barno 2006). Ultimately, the more suitable a waterway is to supporting trout the higher the classification and the more protection it will receive. The Department’s Land Use Regulation Program, through Stream Encroachment, Freshwater Wetlands, and the more recently developed storm water rules acknowledge the fragile nature of these ecosystems and provide additional protective measures. Although a vast amount of work has been accomplished in classifying New Jersey waters, waters continue to be classified and reclassified according to their trout supporting capabilities, when justified by additional field investigation data collected by NJDFW. These data are interpreted and recommendations for surface water classification changes are provided to DEP’s Bureau of Water Monitoring and Standards, Environmental Analysis Restoration and Standards, who ultimately integrate changes to the SWQS through an established rule making process. -
New Jersey Water Supply Plan 2017-2022 V 1.01
State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection NEW JERSEY WATER SUPPLY PLAN 2017-2022 V 1.01 STATE OF NEW JERSEY Chris Christie, Governor Kim Guadagno, Lieutenant Governor Department of Environmental Protection Bob Martin, Commissioner Water Resources Management Dan Kennedy, Assistant Commissioner NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NJDEP’s core mission is and will continue to be the protection of the air, waters, land and natural and historic re- sources of the State to ensure continued public benefit. The Department’s mission is advanced through effective and balanced implementation and enforcement of environmental laws to protect these resources and the health and safety of our residents. At the same time, it is crucial to understand how actions of this agency can impact the State’s economic growth, to recognize the interconnection of the health of New Jersey’s environment and its economy, and to appreciate that environmental stewardship and positive economic growth are not mutually exclusive goals: we will continue to protect the environmental while playing a key role in positively impacting the economic growth of the state. Suggested citation: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2017, New Jersey Water Supply Plan 2017-2022: 484p, http://www.nj.gov/dep/watersupply/wsp.html Cover Photo: “Delaware River from the Calhoun Street Bridge, Trenton, NJ”. Photo by Chelsea DuBrul. ii | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS AUTHORITY ................................................................................................................................................................. -
Flood Hazard Area Control Act Rules
THIS IS A COURTESY COPY OF THIS RULE. ALL OF THE DEPARTMENT’S RULES ARE COMPILED IN TITLE 7 OF THE NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. N.J.A.C. 7:13 FLOOD HAZARD AREA CONTROL ACT RULES Statutory authority: N.J.S.A. 12:5-3; 13:1D-1 et seq.; 13:1D-29 et seq., specifically 13:1D-33; 13:9A-1 et seq.; 13:19-1 et seq.; 13:20-1 et seq.; 58:10A-1 et seq.; 58:11A-1 et seq.; and 58:16A-50 et seq. Date last amended: July 8, 2021 For regulatory history and effective dates, see the New Jersey Administrative Code Table of Contents CHAPTER 13 ................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 FLOOD HAZARD AREA CONTROL ACT RULES ........................................................................................................... 6 SUBCHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS ........................................................................................................................ 6 7:13-1.1 Purpose and scope ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 7:13-1.2 Definitions .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 7:13-1.3 Forms, checklists, information, technical manual; Department address and website ............................................. 21 7:13-1.4 Delegation of authority .............................................................................................................................................