Volume Ii Tomo Ii Diagnosis Biotic Environmen
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Pöyry Tecnologia Ltda. Av. Alfredo Egídio de Souza Aranha, 100 Bloco B - 5° andar 04726-170 São Paulo - SP BRASIL Tel. +55 11 3472 6955 Fax +55 11 3472 6980 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT E-mail: [email protected] STUDY (EIA-RIMA) Date 19.10.2018 N° Reference 109000573-001-0000-E-1501 Page 1 LD Celulose S.A. Dissolving pulp mill in Indianópolis and Araguari, Minas Gerais VOLUME II – ENVIRONMENTAL DIAGNOSIS TOMO II – BIOTIC ENVIRONMENT Content Annex Distribution LD Celulose S.A. E PÖYRY - Orig. 19/10/18 –hbo 19/10/18 – bvv 19/10/18 – hfw 19/10/18 – hfw Para informação Rev. Data/Autor Data/Verificado Data/Aprovado Data/Autorizado Observações 109000573-001-0000-E-1501 2 SUMARY 8.3 Biotic Environment ................................................................................................................ 8 8.3.1 Objective .................................................................................................................... 8 8.3.2 Studied Area ............................................................................................................... 9 8.3.3 Regional Context ...................................................................................................... 10 8.3.4 Terrestrian Flora and Fauna....................................................................................... 15 8.3.5 Aquatic fauna .......................................................................................................... 167 8.3.6 Conservation Units (UC) and Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation (APCB) 219 8.3.7 References .............................................................................................................. 224 109000573-001-0000-E-1501 3 FIGURES LIST Figure 1 – Flora, reptiles and amphibians, birds and mammals sampling points map at the studied area near Araguari and Indianópolis cities, MG. .......................................................... 10 Figure 2 – Flora sampling points location. ................................................................................. 50 Figure 3 – Species distribution among the ten families with greater richness found in remaining areas of influence of the enterprise, between Araguari and Indianópolis cities, Minas Gerais, Brazil. ................................................................................................................... 73 Figure 4 – Species distribution among the habits found in remaining enterprise areas of influence, between Araguari and Indianópolis cities, Minas Gerais, Brazil.............................. 75 Figure 5 – Species distribution among the physiognomies found in remaining sampled areas. ...................................................................................................................................................... 76 Figure 6 – Photographic record of the species found in the remnants of vegetation at sampled areas. A – Styrax ferrugineus; B – Leucaena leucocephala; C – Guettarda virbunoides; D – Ficus pertusa; E and F – Passiflora foetida. ................................................................................ 78 Figure 7 – Photographic record of the species found in the remnants of vegetation at the sampled area. A – Adiantum deflectans; B – Davilla elliptica; C – Duguetia furfuracea; D – Vochysia rufa................................................................................................................................ 79 Figure 8 – Photographic record of the species found in the remnants of vegetation at the sampled areas. A – Micropholis venulosa; B – Solanum lycocarpum; C – Kielmeyera rubriflora; D – Adenocalymma peregrinum; E – Zeyheria montana; F – Chrysophyllum marginatum. ....... 80 Figure 9 – Comparison between families richness found in the primary and secondary data. 83 Figure 10 – Reptiles and amphibians sampling points location. ................................................ 91 Figure 11 – Reptiles and amphibians sampling points photographic record. ........................... 93 Figure 12 – Abundance of species recorded in the reptiles and amphibians sample, during the first campaign (blue) and the second campaign (red). ............................................................... 95 Figure 13 – Rarefaction (blue) and estimated richness (black) curves of the recorded species. A 95% confidence interval is established with respect to the collector curve (the dotted lines). ...................................................................................................................................................... 96 Figure 14 – Photographic register of the reptiles and amphibians species found in the remnants of vegetation at sampled areas. ................................................................................... 99 Figure 15 – Species richness per reptiles and amphibians families in the area of influence via secondary data (DS) and via raw data (DB). ............................................................................ 100 Figure 16 – Birds sampling points location. ............................................................................. 117 Figure 17 – Representation of non-Passerine bird species found in both campaigns at the sampled area. ............................................................................................................................. 127 Figure 18 – Representation of Passerine birds families found in both campaigns at the sampled area. ............................................................................................................................. 128 Figure 19 – Rarefaction curve (solid line) and estimated richness by Jackknife 1 (dashed line) of the birds recorded in the sampled areas. 95% of confidence interval was established with respect to the collector curve (dotted lines). ............................................................................. 129 Figure 20 – Photographic record of the birds species found in the remnants of vegetation at the sampled areas. ..................................................................................................................... 134 Figure 21 – Representation of Non-Passerine bird species at the sampled area, considering the data obtained in this survey (DB-raw/primary data) and also the data obtained through the bibliographic survey (DS-secondary data). .............................................................................. 134 Figure 22 – Representation of Passerine bird species at the sampled area, considering the data obtained in this survey (DB-raw/primary data) and also the data obtained through the bibliographic survey (DS-secondary data). .............................................................................. 135 109000573-001-0000-E-1501 4 Figure 23 – Cameras used in the mammals sampling. ............................................................. 138 Figure 24 – Mammals camera traps points location. ............................................................... 141 Figure 25 – Rarefaction curve (in blue) and estimated richness by Jackknife 1 (in black) of the mammalian registered at the sampled areas. 95% confidence interval is established with respect to the collector curve (dotted lines). ............................................................................. 145 Figure 26 – Photographic record of the mammals species found in the remnants of vegetation at the sampled areas. ................................................................................................................. 147 Figure 27 – Comparison between families with greater richness found in the primary data collection and secondary data obtained from works carried out in other areas of the region. .................................................................................................................................................... 148 Figure 28 – Three control centers (CCs) in yellow dashed circles close to urban centers and one near the area of the future enterprise at Nova Monte Carmelo farm represented by the orange dotted circle. .................................................................................................................. 150 Figure 29 – Control Center Uberlândia – Sampling points (yellow) and path traveled in C.C. during the study (blue). ............................................................................................................. 150 Figure 30 – Control Center Araguari – Sampling points (yellow) and path traveled in C.C. during the study (blue). ............................................................................................................. 151 Figure 31 – Control Center Indianópolis – Sampling points (yellow) and path traveled in C.C. during the study (blue). ............................................................................................................. 152 Figure 32 – Control Center Nova Monte Carmelo – Sampling points (yellow) and path traveled in C.C. during the study (blue). .................................................................................. 153 Figure 33 – Sampling points for vector insects study. .............................................................. 154 Figure 34 – Shannon trap type and the collector in activety.................................................... 157 Figure 35 – CDC trap type with luminous bait ........................................................................ 157 Figure 36 – Richness and abundances registered by sampling point .....................................