DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of the Victoria Police Witness Protection Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of the Victoria Police Witness Protection Program REVIEW OF THE VICTORIA POLICE WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM Report of the Director, Police Integrity July 2005 Ordered to be printed Victorian Government Printer Session 2003 - 2005 P.P. No.145 To The Honourable the President of the Legislative Council and The Honourable the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Events last year and this have drawn to public attention the danger faced by some witnesses who give evidence in criminal trials or who are to do so. Upholding the criminal law and maintaining civil order depend to a very large extent on the preparedness of witnesses to give evidence to the court: if there is no witness, there can generally be no prosecution. The integrity and efficiency of our system of witness protection is important. It is a duty of the justice system to protect witnesses; only rarely may they need protection against the ultimate violence of murder, but any intimidated witness, too frightened to speak out fully and truthfully, undermines the cause of justice. Apathetic witnesses and witnesses who fear the system of justice itself are also of concern. In response to the increased attention on witnesses and acting under new powers to conduct an investigation on my own motion, I initiated a review into the Victoria Police Witness Protection Program under s.86NA of the Police Regulation Act 1958. This Report describes the findings of that review and sets out recommendations for reform. I present it to the Parliament pursuant to s.102J(2) of the Act. The immediate future – given current trends in serious and organized crime – suggests an increase in demand for Witsec services. Preparation for such needs should be made now. This review has found that while Victoria’s current Witness Protection Program is basically sound, more resources are required along with some important policy and procedural changes. The Force itself undertook a review of Witsec last year to address a number of challenges faced by the Program and the Unit responsible for its operation. Already there have been some organisational and procedural adjustments. Witnesses are not just a police responsibility. Improvements in the handling of witnesses and attitudes towards being a witness will take time and effort. Given the will on the part of Police Command, and with the support and encouragement of Government, immediate shortcomings could be remedied and longer-term change initiated. Within the context of the overall police budget, all the funds required for Witsec’s enlargement and reform would be modest. The high rate of return on such an investment should commend itself to a public where there is rising concern about the effectiveness and integrity of parts of the justice system. G E Brouwer DIRECTOR, POLICE INTEGRITY CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................3 2. WITNESS PROTECTION – A BRIEF HISTORY ............................5 3. “NO WITNESS – NO JUSTICE” .......................................... 6 4. WITNESS PROTECTION – “ALL IN” OR “ALL OUT” ......................10 5. LEGISLATIVE BASIS FOR THE PROTECTION OF WITNESSES ......15 6. ENTRY INTO WITNESS PROTECTION ..................................17 7. ON THE PROGRAM .......................................................27 8. THE COURTS AND THE LEGAL PROCESS .............................34 9. PROTECTION, PAYBACK AND REHABILITATION .....................39 10. MANAGEMENT ............................................................41 11. TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY .............................44 12. CONCLUSION .............................................................46 Appendix: Three case studies ........................................48 Bibliography ..............................................................53 1 2 1. INTRODUCTION In any general discussion of the administration of criminal justice, witness protection would seldom be an early topic raised. It is more likely to be regarded among the necessary administrative nuts and bolts, but not demanding deep attention in its own right. Far more readily discussed are likely to be (to name but a few): crime statistics; policing and detection; conviction rates; penal policy, sentencing and rehabilitation of offenders; youth crime; court proceedings and evidentiary matters; civil rights of citizens and legal representation. In a democracy such as Victoria, law enforcement proceeds according to strict legal principles and rules, and usually by way of hearing or trial in open court. Whether a case proceeds – indeed, whether a prosecution even begins – depends on the existence of evidence: some basic testimony of substance and apparent veracity which can be tested under cross-examination. Evidence usually comes before the court through the words of witnesses who may, if necessary, be compelled to attend; they are sworn, under heavy penalties, to tell the truth. The testimony of witnesses thus lies close to the start and to the heart of the exercise of the criminal jurisdiction. Whether it be the Magistrates’ Courts, the County Court or the Supreme Court, it is broadly true to say: “No witness: no prosecution”. It follows that any force or influence which may prevent witnesses from appearing in court, or which may make them reluctant to speak with full candour, or which promises them a reward for (say) concealing part of the truth, must tend to pervert the course of justice. Such circumstances could lead a court to reach a wrong decision; people may be acquitted of offences which they have indeed committed; innocent persons may be convicted, or left to live under a cloud of suspicion. The public loses confidence in the effectiveness and fairness of the courts. The tainted evidence of a witness who has been tampered with, or testimony which has been withheld, strikes at the integrity of the foundations of justice. Such abuses can never be tolerated by any society which aspires to good governance. From earliest times, English law has treated subornation of witnesses – any attempt to silence, or to change the story they will tell the court – as a grave offence deserving severe punishment. It remains a crime not lightly regarded by any court. 3 There are concerns that attempts at subornation are increasing. Some observers would say that powerful and wealthy organized crime groups regard it as a standard weapon in their anti-social armoury, to be used as a matter of course whenever the need arises. There is evidence, too, pointing to its use by corrupt police officers. Witnesses who are required to give evidence in criminal proceedings can potentially be at risk from unscrupulous persons who fear honest information being heard by the court. Witnesses may be threatened with death or injury; hints of threats – sometimes no more than hints – may be directed against the witness’s spouse or children; property may be damaged or threatened; and their future reputation may be set at risk. The law requires that witnesses be protected simply as citizens, not merely because of their usually brief role as witnesses. That many witnesses at risk themselves have serious criminal records does not weaken the case for their protection. In practice, protection may take the simple form of special vigilance by the police with (perhaps) the conspicuous “drive-by” appearance of a police car from time to time in the witness’s street. At the other extreme, it may require a whole family to be provided with a new identity, from birth certificates to current passports, and resettled overseas. Such operations require extreme finesse, and delicate liaison with a multiplicity of official and private bodies both Commonwealth and State, and with like organizations overseas. In Victoria, the Witness Protection Act 1991 empowered the Chief Commissioner of Police to provide safety and support for witnesses who stood in need of it. The fourteen years of the Act’s operation have seen many developments, not all of them encouraging. Similar Acts are now in force in other Australian states, providing comparative information which has been considered in this review. Useful material has also been gathered from jurisdictions overseas – notably from Britain, Canada, New Zealand and the United States. Beyond doubt, the time is ripe for a fresh appraisal of Victoria’s own experience, and of the lessons we may be able to learn from elsewhere. If this point needed emphasis, it was starkly supplied by the murder in Melbourne last year of two intended witnesses in an important criminal trial – Terence and Christine Hodson – in their own home. Part of the prosecution case collapsed with their deaths and criminal charges of the most serious kind had to be withdrawn. By their own choice, neither of the Hodsons had been participants 4 in Victoria’s Witness Protection Program, a fact overlooked in much of the media reporting of their murders. It was often asserted, wrongly, that Mr and Mrs Hodson were on the Program. That lesson was not wasted. In 2004, legislation for the first time gave the then Police Ombudsman, now the Director, Police Integrity, power to investigate any matter which he thought appropriate. It was no longer necessary for a complaint or a reference to be received from an outside body before I could act. The first inquiry initiated under the new provision was into the operation and effectiveness of the Victoria Police Witness Protection Program, of which this is the Report. It has involved a review of the literature about witness protection and of complaints received by my Office as well as interviews, including with a number
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Witness Protection Program
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ~---------~--~--~~~-~~--~----- WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM BY THE HAWAII CRIME COMMISSION State Capitol Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 NOVEMBER 1980 291 -----~------~~ ~~ 1 WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the pE'rson or organization onginatlng It. POints of view or opinions stated in thiS document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the officlat position or pOlicies of the Nationat Institute of Justice Permission to reproduce this COPl"igblQQ matenal has been granted by Hawaii Crime Commission --------.. --~. - -----~~~------------ ---------------------------- - ---- to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the ~w. owner. Hawaii Crime Commission November 1980 1'j George R. Ariyoshi Jean S. King 1 Governor Lt. Governor This report provides a study of witness protection programs, recommendations, and a model statute for consideration by the Legislature. The Crime Commission recommends implementation of the statute to aid in the war on career and organized crime connected persons and activities. A brief Executive Summary will allow interested persons to quickly grasp the study, understand the recommendations and statute. A Table of Contents will allow the reader to find specific 'i, , information without having to read the complete report. .\ THOMAS T. OSHIRO Chairman Hawaii Crime Commission Commission Members RAFAEL ACOBA NEAL OKABAYASHI GENE ALBANO (resigned Oct. 1980) BORICK PEROFF MAGGIE BUNSON (resigned Oct. 1980) NAPUA STEVENS POIRE A. VAN HORN DIAMOND FRANK WHITE, JR. ALWYN KAKUDA Edward J.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Threats and Reprisals Against Victims of Torture and Related International Crimes
    ENDING THREATS AND REPRISALS AGAINST VICTIMS OF TORTURE AND RELATED INTERNATIONAL CRIMES: A CALL TO ACTION December 2009 87 Vauxhall Walk London, SE11 5HJ United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7793 1777 Fax: +44 (0)20 7793 1719 Web: www.redress.org Registered Charity No.: 1015786 This Report was researched and written by Paulina Vega Gonzalez and Carla Ferstman. © The Redress Trust This Publication is available in English, French, Spanish and Arabic and is available in hard copy and electronic (soft) copy, from REDRESS’ website. For further information on this or other REDRESS publications, please contact REDRESS or visit our website: www.redress.org. We are very grateful to the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights for funding this research. 2 Introduction | REDRESS ENDING THREATS AND REPRISALS AGAINST VICTIMS OF TORTURE AND RELATED INTERNATIONAL CRIMES: A CALL TO ACTION Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 5 Part I. Identifying the Problem ........................................................................................... 9 I.1 The Crimes........................................................................................................................ 9 I.2 The Individuals and Groups Usually in Need of Protection ........................................... 11 Part II. The Right of Protection......................................................................................... 15 II.1 Protection as a Right in and
    [Show full text]
  • Widening the Antimafia Net: Child Protection and the Socio-Cultural
    YJJ0010.1177/1473225418791420Youth JusticeSergi 791420research-article2018 Original Article Youth Justice 1 –20 Widening the Antimafia Net: © The Author(s) 2018 Reprints and permissions: Child Protection and the sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225418791420DOI: 10.1177/1473225418791420 Socio-Cultural Transmission of journals.sagepub.com/home/yjj Mafia Behaviours in Calabria Anna Sergi Abstract This article explores proceedings by the Youth Tribunal of Reggio Calabria, Southern Italy, aimed at the protection of children in families where one or both parents are investigated for mafia offences. The findings show that preventing the transmission of mafia (‘ndrangheta) culture in the local context has become an essential part of child protection measures. This article will argue that when discussing child protection in criminal families, it is necessary (a) to question the nature of the bonds of these families with the socio- cultural context, and (b) to concretely assess the way this context wishes to affect the family’s criminality. Keywords child welfare, criminal families, cultural transmission, Italy, mafia, organised crime, youth justice Introduction ‘Ndrangheta is the collective name given to mafia clans in the Calabrian region at the toe of Italy. Antimafia prosecutors in Italy claim that the ‘ndrangheta is the most powerful mafia both in Italy and also abroad (DNA, 2017). Indeed most contemporary literature on the ‘ndrangheta highlights its global reach, its mobility and its capacity to penetrate and dominate various legal and illegal markets nationally and transnationally (Sergi and Lavorgna, 2016). This article examines the ways in which the Youth Tribunal in Reggio Calabria – and in Reggio Calabria only in the whole of Italy – is attempting to break mafia power locally, by affecting the way mafia culture and behaviours are transmitted and learned in mafia families.
    [Show full text]
  • La Cosa Nostra in the US
    NIJ - International Center - U.N Activities - La Cosa Nostra in the US Participating in the U.N.'s crime prevention program. LA COSA NOSTRA IN THE UNITED STATES by James O. Finckenauer, Ph.D. International Center National Institute of Justice Organizational Structure La Cosa Nostra or LCN -- also known as the Mafia, the mob, the outfit, the office -- is a collection of Italian- American organized crime “families” that has been operating in the United States since the 1920s. For nearly three quarters of a century, beginning during the time of Prohibition and extending into the 1990s, the LCN was clearly the most prominent criminal organization in the U.S. Indeed, it was synonymous with organized crime. In recent years, the LCN has been severely crippled by law enforcement, and over the past decade has been challenged in a number of its criminal markets by other organized crime groups. Nevertheless, with respect to those criteria that best define the harm capacity of criminal organizations, it is still pre-eminent. The LCN has greater capacity to gain monopoly control over criminal markets, to use or threaten violence to maintain that control, and to corrupt law enforcement and the political system than does any of its competitors. As one eminent scholar has also pointed out, “no other criminal organization [in the United States] has controlled labor unions, organized employer cartels, operated as a rationalizing force in major industries, and functioned as a bridge between the upperworld and the underworld” (Jacobs, 1999:128). It is this capacity that distinguishes the LCN from all other criminal organizations in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Accomplice-Witness and Organized Crime: Theory and Evidence from Italy
    TSE-403 March 2013 “Accomplice‐Witness and Organized Crime: Theory and Evidence from Italy” Antonio Acconcia, Giovanni Immordino, Salvatore Piccolo and Patrick Rey 7 Accomplice-Witness and Organized Crime: Theory and Evidence from Italy Antonio Acconciay Giovanni Immordinoz Salvatore Piccolox Patrick Rey{ March 30, 2013 Abstract We develop an agency model of organized crime accounting for the main trade-o¤s involved by the introduction of an accomplice-witness program. We characterize the optimal policy and identify its main determinants in a framework where public o¢ cials can be dishonest. Our predictions are tested by using data for Italy before and after the introduction of the 1991 accomplice-witness program. As predicted by the model and the earlier antitrust literature, the program appears to have strengthened deterrence and enhanced prosecution. Moreover, consistently with a novel prediction of our theory, the evidence suggests that the program e¢ cacy is a¤ected by the judicial system e¢ ciency. Keywords: Accomplice-witness, Criminal Organizations, Leniency, Whistleblowing. We greatly bene…ted from comments by one anonymous referee, the editor Richard Friberg, Ran Abramitzki, Orazio Attanasio, Ciro Avitabile, Sandeep Baliga, Richard Blundell, Dimitrios Christelis, Roberta Dessi, Luigi Guiso, Elisabbetta Iossa, Tullio Jappelli, Jakub Kastl, Alessandro Lizzeri, Riccardo Martina, Dilip Mookherjee, Marco Pagano, Erasmo Papagni, Nicola Pavoni, Adam Rosen and Giancarlo Spagnolo for many useful insights. We also thank participants to seminars in Boston (BU), London (UCL), Milan, Naples, SIE Rome (2009), EALE Rome (2009), Stanford, the 2009 CSEF-IGIER summer symposium in economics and …nance (Capri) and the 2009 Bonn and Paris Workshop on The Empirics of Crime and Deterrence (Paris) for their comments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Witness Protection Program Revisited and Compared: Reshaping an Old Weapon to Meet New Challenges in the Global Crime Fighting Effort
    University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review Volume 21 Issue 2 Volume 21 Issue 2 (Spring 2014) Article 4 5-1-2014 The Federal Witness Protection Program Revisited and Compared: Reshaping an Old Weapon to Meet New Challenges in the Global Crime Fighting Effort Raneta Lawson Mack Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umiclr Part of the National Security Law Commons Recommended Citation Raneta Lawson Mack, The Federal Witness Protection Program Revisited and Compared: Reshaping an Old Weapon to Meet New Challenges in the Global Crime Fighting Effort, 21 U. Miami Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 191 (2014) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umiclr/vol21/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FEDERAL WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM REVISITED AND COMPARED: RESHAPING AN OLD WEAPON TO MEET NEW CHALLENGES IN THE GLOBAL CRIME FIGHTING EFFORT Raneta Lawson Mack* I. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 192 II. A BRIEF HISTORICAL OVERVIEW ....................... 196 III. THE WITNESS SECURITY REFORM ACT OF 1984- 18 U.S.C. §§3521-28 ......................................... ..... 198 A. AUDITS OF THE WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM ................. 203 B. EVOLUTION OF THE WPP AND FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGE .................................. ..... 206 IV. A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE .................... ......... 207 A. QUALIFICATIONS FOR WITNESS PROTECTION ...... ...... 210 B. THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS ............. ......... 219 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Witness Protection As a Key Tool in Addressing Serious and Organized Crime
    WITNESS PROTECTION AS A KEY TOOL IN ADDRESSING SERIOUS AND ORGANIZED CRIME Karen Kramer＊ I. INTRODUCTION Many countries are affected by criminal activities that have a profound impact on human security and development, such as corruption, drug trafficking, serious and organized crime, human rights violations and terrorism. Yet, the ability the criminal justice systems of countries to investigate and prosecute such forms of serious crimes are often very limited. One of the challenges for many for countries is in obtaining the cooperation of victims and witnesses in order to obtain important information and evidence about such criminal matters. This paper will discuss: 1) the globalization of organized crime as background on why organized crime is a problem for all states; 2) why witness protection measures are important for the effective functioning of criminal justice systems; 3) what is meant by the concepts of victim and witness assistance, support and security; 4) some of the factors that have given rise to witness protection programmes; 5) the objectives and key features and elements of most witness protection programmes; 6) the use of witness protection; and 7) provide some recommendations. This paper looks at witness protection primarily from the point of view of serious and organized crime but mentions also its use in the human rights context as well as in the work of the International Courts and Tribunals. The paper draws substantially from the UNODC Good Practices for the Protection of Witnesses in Criminal Proceedings Involving Organized Crime manual published in 2008, as well as upon information obtained from many colleagues working in the field of witness protection around the world whose expertise, support and advice have been instrumental to the work of UNODC in supporting states in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Witness Protection Program: Report of the Standing
    HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA REVIEW OF THE WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security Garry Breitkreuz, MP Chair MARCH 2008 39th PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION The Speaker of the House hereby grants permission to reproduce this document, in whole or in part for use in schools and for other purposes such as private study, research, criticism, review or newspaper summary. Any commercial or other use or reproduction of this publication requires the express prior written authorization of the Speaker of the House of Commons. If this document contains excerpts or the full text of briefs presented to the Committee, permission to reproduce these briefs, in whole or in part, must be obtained from their authors. Also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire: http://www.parl.gc.ca Available from Communication Canada — Publishing, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9 REVIEW OF THE WITNESS PROTECTION PROGRAM Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security Garry Breitkreuz, MP Chair MARCH 2008 39th PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY AND NATIONAL SECURITY (39-2) CHAIR Garry Breitkreuz VICE-CHAIRS Hon. Roy Cullen Penny Priddy MEMBERS Hon. Sue Barnes Colin Mayes Bonnie Brown Serge Ménard Gord Brown Rick Norlock Hon. Ujjal Dosanjh Ève-Mary Thaï Thi Lac Dave Mackenzie CLERK OF THE COMMITTEE Roger Préfontaine LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT Parliamentary Information and Research Service Lyne Casavant Philip Rosen iii STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY AND NATIONAL SECURITY (39-1) CHAIR Garry Breitkreuz VICE-CHAIRS Joe Comartin Hon. Roy Cullen MEMBERS Hon. Sue Barnes Laurie Hawn Gord Brown Rick Norlock Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Witnesses Do Not Testify
    T O EN F J TM U R ST U.S. Department of Justice A I P C E E D B O J C S F A Office of Justice Programs V M F O I N A C I J S R E BJ G O OJJ DP O F PR National Institute of Justice JUSTICE National Institute of Justice Issues and Practices Preventing Gang- and Drug-Related Witness Intimidation About the National Institute of Justice The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), a component of the • The research and development program that resulted in Office of Justice Programs, is the research and development the creation of police body armor that has meant the agency of the U.S. Department of Justice. NIJ was estab- difference between life and death to hundreds of police lished to prevent and reduce crime and to improve the officers. criminal justice system. Specific mandates established by Congress in the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act • Pioneering scientific advances such as the research and of 1968, as amended, and the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 development of DNA analysis to positively identify direct the National Institute of Justice to: suspects and eliminate the innocent from suspicion. • Sponsor special projects, and research and develop- • The evaluation of innovative justice programs to deter- ment programs that will improve and strengthen the mine what works, including drug enforcement, commu- criminal justice system and reduce or prevent crime. nity policing, community anti-drug initiatives, prosecu- tion of complex drug cases, drug testing throughout the • Conduct national demonstration projects that employ criminal justice system, and user accountability pro- innovative or promising approaches for improving crimi- grams.
    [Show full text]
  • Triggering Terror: Illicit Gun Markets and Firearms Acquisition of Terrorist Networks in Europe
    Terror Triggering of Terroristof Networks in Europe Illicit Gun Markets and Firearms Acquisition Triggering Terror Illicit Gun Markets Flemish Peace Institute and Firearms Acquisition Leuvenseweg 86 1000 Brussels of Terrorist Networks tel. + 32 2 552 45 91 [email protected] Nils Duquet Edited by in Europe www.flemishpeaceinstitute.eu The Flemish Peace Institute was founded by decree of the Flemish Parliament as an independent institute for research on peace issues. The peace Institute conducts scientific research, documents relevant information sources, and informs and advises the Flemish Parliament and the public at large on questions of peace. Edited by Co- funded by the Internal Security Fund of the European Union Nils Duquet Triggering Terror Illicit Gun Markets and Firearms Acquisition of Terrorist Networks in Europe Triggering Terror Illicit Gun Markets and Firearms Acquisition of Terrorist Networks in Europe Nils Duquet (ed.) Co- funded by the Internal Security Fund of the European Union Colophon Triggering Terror: Illicit Gun Markets and Firearms Acquisition of Terrorist Networks in Europe ISBN 9789078864905 © Flemish Peace Institute, Brussels, 17 April 2018 Project SAFTE Project SAFTE is an international research project funded by the European Commission. SAFTE stands for ‘Studying the Acquisition of illicit Firearms by Terrorists in Europe’. The research was conducted by an international network of firearms experts. Project coordination: Flemish Peace Institute Project partners: SIPRI and Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant’Anna. Country study teams: • Flemish Peace Institute • SIPRI • Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant’Anna. • Arquebus Solutions • Bureau Bruinsma • Small Arms Survey Project SAFTE has received funding from DG Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission under the call for proposals to support ‘Transnational initiatives to fight trafficking in drugs and firearms’ (HOME/2015/ISFP/AG/TDFX) of the Internal Security Fund (2014-2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Victim and Witness Assistance
    , U.S. Department of Justice r Bureau of Justice Sta.tisties r ________________________________________________'. • "', • ~ ..~ , __________• C<~~~,iII ~". New State Laws and the System's Response Victim and Witness Assistance Traditionally, the criminal justice system in this country has been offender­ May 1983 oriented, focusing on the apprehension, prosecution, punishment and rehabilitation The administration of American President's Task Force on Victims of of wrong doers. Victims and witnesses criminal justice has acquired a new Crime-it is clear that a substantial have been considered only when they play focus: victim and witness assistance. alteration is expected in the practices i a role in the identification and prosecu­ In seeking the cooperation of victims of police, prosecutors, judges, probation i tion of offenders. The justice system and witnesses, criminal justice agencies and parole officials, members of the I cannot function without tire assistance are increasingly sensitive to the need of bar, and health and support agencies. l and cooperation of victims and witnesses, victims for information, notification, Requirements for notifying victims of yet little if any recognition has been given' compensation, participation, and simple the status of their cases, for reflecting l~ to their rights and less has been done to , understanding. Concerns of victims, the views and experiences of victims, irrb assist them in overcoming the frustrations witnesses, and their extended families and for facilitating the participation of i~ and economic sacrifices that involvement are here framed in the context of issues victims at each stage of the criminal in criminal proceedings causes. treated by the Bureau of Justice proceeding will place new burdens on I~ This attitude has begun to change in Statistics over the past decade- both law enforcement and social ! the last decade, particularly in the last (1) developing computer-based service agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Justice Sector Afterthought: Witness Protection in Africa
    Witness Protection cover 5/5/10 1:57 PM Page 1 ISS Head Office THE JUSTICE SEC Block D, Brooklyn Court, 361 Veale Street New Muckleneuk, Pretoria The justice sector Tel: (27-12) 346 9500 Fax: (27-12) 346 9570 E-mail: [email protected] afterthought: ISS Addis Ababa Office First Floor, Ki-Ab Building, T Alexander Pushkin Street, OR AFTERTHOUGHT Protection of African witnesses has yet to receive serious Pushkin Square, Addis Ababa academic examination. The justice sector afterthought: Tel: (251-11) 372 1154/5/6 Fax: (251-11) 372 5954 Witness protection in Africa Witness protection in Africa constitutes a first attempt to E-mail: [email protected] address this gap in the literature. The book examines a critical component of both ISS Cape Town Office international and domestic criminal justice processes. 2nd Floor, The Armoury, Buchanan Square Where international criminal tribunals have been 160 Sir Lowry Road, Woodstock, Cape Town established to address genocide, war crimes and crimes Tel: (27-21) 461 7211 Fax: (27-21) 461 7213 : against humanity, witness testimony – and therefore E-mail: [email protected] IN AFRICA WITNESS PROTECTION CHRIS MAHON witness protection – has been vital to successful prosecutions. Whether it is the dramatic death of almost ISS Nairobi Office 100 witnesses in the formative years of the International Braeside Gardens, Lavington, Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, the disproportionate Gitanga off Muthangari Road, Nairobi power of the prosecution to provide material benefit to Tel: (254 -20) 386 1625 Fax: (254-20) 386 1639 witnesses at the Special Court for Sierra Leone, or the E-mail: [email protected] International Criminal Court's enormous task of protecting witnesses in multiple conflicts at any given ISS Pretoria Office time, The justice sector afterthought provides the first Block C, Brooklyn Court, 3611 Veale Street description of formerly off-limits processes.
    [Show full text]