DOCSLIB.ORG

THE REINVENTED LIBERTINE in the NINETEENTH CENTURY By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE REINVENTED LIBERTINE in the NINETEENTH CENTURY By TWICE BORN GODS: THE REINVENTED LIBERTINE IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY by Tina Maria Dyer A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English The University of Utah May 2015 Copyright © Tina Maria Dyer 2015 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF DISSERTATION APPROVAL The dissertation of Tina Maria Dyer has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Matthew Potolsky , Chair 06 March 2015 Date Approved Therese De Raedt , Member 06 March 2015 Date Approved Scott Black , Member 06 March 2015 Date Approved Howard Horwitz , Member 06 March 2015 Date Approved Vincent Pecora , Member 06 March 2015 Date Approved and by Barry Weller , Chair/Dean of the Department/College/School of English and by David B. Kieda, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT The claim has been made that the nineteenth century’s interest in libertine fiction is merely “archival.” This dissertation seeks to contest that claim by examining the reuse of certain well-known, if not notorious, characters from European seduction narratives of the fifteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries—Valmont, Don Juan, and Tannhäuser—in the work of George Gordon, Lord Byron, Charles Baudelaire, Algernon Swinburne, and Aubrey Beardsley. It finds that these seducers are not static characters deployed for the purpose of allusion or critique, but heroes, reworked and rehabilitated as the central figures of literary seductions intended to entice and control the reader and address the perceived inequities of nineteenth-century morality or politics. By applying a four-phase framework for seduction derived from canonical seduction narratives, the argument demonstrates how the reinvented seducers have been stripped down, personalized, redressed, and recontextualized in narratives that seek to compel through seduction and educate through experience. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………. v INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………... 1 Chapters 1. SEDUCTION………………………………………………………………… 14 2. A PRACTICAL EDUCATION: BYRON’S DON JUAN AND THE INGENUE’S JOURNEY….…………………………………………………. 36 The Birth of Don Juan…………………………………………………… 38 The Cuckoo in the Harem……………………………………………….. 63 The Harrowing of London………………………………………………. 71 3. ASTRIDE THE WORLDS: BAUDELAIRE AND THE REINVENTED VALMONT…………………………………………………………………... 81 Obscenity and the Curriculum of Vice…………………………………... 83 The Eighteenth Century………………………………………………….. 87 The Object: Valmont as Dandy………………………………………….. 91 The Agent: Valmont as Satan……………………………………………. 99 4. SWINBURNE’S “LAUS VENERIS” OR THE NIHILIST TRIUMPHANT.. 110 The Tradition……………………………………………………………… 111 The Innovation……………………………………………………………. 116 The Lesson……………………………………………………………….. 142 5. THE INTENTIONAL TOURIST: BEARDSLEY’S THE STORY OF VENUS AND TANNHAUSER……………………………………………… 145 CONCLUSION: REBORN, REFASHIONED, REBOOTED, REPEAT……………………………………………………………………… 169 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my chair, Dr. Matthew Potolsky, and my committee, Dr. Therese de Raedt, Dr. Scott Black, Dr. Howard Horwitz, and Dr. Vincent Pecora, for their endless patience; my first reader, Dr. Jeffrey V. Yule, for his enthusiasm and encouragement, and my family, for their extraordinary tolerance through this process. INTRODUCTION Ian Kelly prefaces his biography of Giacomo Casanova with a brief anecdote retelling Casanova’s reaction to Mozart’s Don Giovanni. “Seen it?” Casanova is thought to have responded to the inquiry, “I’ve practically lived it” (1). It is a moment that underscores Casanova’s habitual wit and approachability, but it also says a great deal about the essential relevance of Don Giovanni. By the time of the opera’s Prague premiere in 1787, the tragi-comic antihero Don Juan had been going to his sticky supernatural end for more than 150 years,1 his cosmopolitan adventures advancing posthumously to occupy stages all across Europe. Yet Don Giovanni is not merely the subject of revival, like a Mirabeau perpetually parroting the same witticisms decade after decade in the same drawing room. Don Giovanni—or Don Juan, or Don John, as aliases vary according to the preferences and prejudices of the audience which consumes him— gets rewritten. He is tragic; he is comic; he is villain; he is hero; he is a killer, a rapist, a lover, a philosopher… He is, in short, an endlessly reconstitutable archetype. But it was not just the eighteenth century that had such a lust for recycling the classic heroes of dirty didactic tales; the nineteenth century also revived Don Juan— among others—with gusto.2 As we will see, the Spanish seducer was taken to the English everyman’s bosom along with the dame and the devil of pantomime, before being elevated into something uncommon again in Byron’s Don Juan; Valmont was promoted from subject of moral outrage to subject of analysis in Baudelaire’s “Notes sur Les Liaisons dangereuses”; Tannhäuser was retrieved from medieval German obscurity and 2 adopted as a subject by everyone who was anyone, at least in Aesthetic circles, becoming a sort of variorum edition of himself. That these characters are both popular and persistent is obvious; what is less clear is why the nineteenth century should have turned to this kind of morally dubious character in particular, and renovated their stories. One of the ways this question has been resolved critically is by discounting the immediacy of the nineteenth century’s interest. In Schooling Sex, James Grantham Turner traces the lineage of a particular genre of libertine discourse—the erotic-didactic text, in particular the predecessors and variants of Chorier’s Satyra Sotadica,—through its sixteenth-, seventeenth-, and early-eighteenth-century evolutions. Any nineteenth-century engagement with the type is confined to an epilogue subtitled “Afterlife and Retrospect.” Though the epilogue nicely balances the prologue, which considers Chorier’s formative impact on the adolescent Casanova, by noting the text’s place on the shelves of the imaginary aesthetic libraries conceived by Baudelaire and Huysmans and its role as a foundation for Forberg’s taxonomy of sex, the epilogue’s treatment of these occurrences emphasizes their archival, rather than practical, deployment. The paragraph that briefly considers Chorier’s reuse in Baudelaire’s “Femmes damnées: Delphine et Hippolyte” and “Les Bijoux” lingers over the moments of direct translation, but appears to consider Baudelaire’s reinventions of the source material half measures rather than valid evolutions: the first poem becomes “something doom-laden and infernal” (393) because of Baudelaire’s inability to sustain true amorality; the second transforms “erotic metamorphosis into the detached, voyeuristic mode of the ‘Museum’” (394)—it becomes a retrospective allusion rather than a contemporarily reinvention. In Turner’s defense, his argument is heavily self-limiting from the outset—focusing only on the eroto-didactic 3 trope, the feminine point of view, and the early-modern timeframe—so it is reasonable that, as the fashion for the trope peters out, so does his interest. He also positions himself openly and aggressively in reaction to previous collections of libertine scholarship, those of Lynn Hunt and Catherine Cusset in particular, that seek to connect libertine literature with modernity. In spite of their “modern moments,” Turner contends “my hard-core texts…have been weakened by anachronistic assimilation into genres like ‘pornography’ and ‘the novel’” (395). This, I believe, underestimates the tenacity of such texts. Mere allusion may be chalked up to only a fashion for decadence or subtle intellectual aggrandizement, an erudite wink on the part of an author to a coterie of readers in the know; reinvention, however, in the manner of Baudelaire’s poems, speaks to the kind of ongoing relevance to the nineteenth century also seen in the lineage of Don Juan— immediate, contemporary, and practical. The intention of this argument is to demonstrate that nineteenth-century revivals of certain seduction narratives are more than just “archival” manifestations; they are eroto-didactic texts themselves, true to the tradition that Turner explores, but elevating the didactic effect outside the narrative itself, replacing the libertine instructor and the novice instructee of the seventeenth-century tradition with libertine text and novice reader of the nineteenth-century transformation. These texts are less about seduction than they are seductions themselves, and my intention is to treat them as rhetoric, to analyze their methods and, wherever possible, divine their aims. The seduction narratives in question are those concerning the characters mentioned earlier—Don Juan, Valmont, and Tannhäuser—and the focus of inquiry is into the manner in which they are redeployed in the works of four of the enfants terribles of the age—Byron, Baudelaire, Swinburne, and 4 Beardsley. These authors would have known libertine literature intimately—it occupied their bookshelves, is mentioned in their diaries, and headlined their theater programs and their opera nights. They would have been readers, just as cognizant of the means and methods of seduction as any of the previous century’s consumers of Molière, Mozart, Choderlos de Laclos, or John Cleland. Initially, their reimaginings of libertine tales document their reader responses: how they negotiated the seductive inconsistencies in the source
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 1 the Traffic in Obscenity
    Notes Chapter 1 The traffic in obscenity 1 John Ashcroft, Remarks, Federal Prosecutors’ Symposium on Obscenity, National Advocacy Center, Columbia, SC (6 June 2002); Report from the Joint Select Committee on Lotteries and Indecent Advertisements (London: Vacher & Sons, 1908). 2 Steven Marcus, The Other Victorians: A Study of Sexuality and Pornography in Mid-Nineteenth-Century England (New York: Basic, 1964). 3 The earliest legal term for this print crime in Britain was obscenity, and I therefore prefer it to more recent terminology. 4 Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge, 1969, trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith (London: Routledge, 2001). 5 Society for the Suppression of Vice (London: S. Gosnell, 1825), 29. 6 Robert Darnton, The Forbidden Best-Sellers of Pre-Revolutionary France (New York: Norton, 1995); Jay David Bolter and Richard Grusin, Remediation: Understanding New Media (Cambridge: MIT, 1999); Lisa Gitelman and Geoffrey B. Pingree eds, New Media, 1740–1914 (Cambridge, MA: MIT 2003); and David Thorburn and Henry Jenkins, eds, Rethinking Media Change: The Aesthetics of Transition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003). 7 Anthony Giddens, Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives (New York: Routledge, 2002), 1. 8 Jean Baudrillard, The Ecstasy of Communication, ed. Sylvère Lotringer, trans. Bernard and Caroline Schutze (Paris: Editions Galilée, 1988), 22, 24. 9 Laurence O’Toole, Pornocopia: Porn, Sex, Technology and Desire (London: Serpent’s Tale, 1999), 51. 10 Baudrillard, The Ecstasy, 24. 11 Edward Said, Orientalism (New York: Vintage, 1979), 87. 12 Saree Makdisi, Romantic Imperialism: Universal Empire and the Culture of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 128. 13 Thomas Pakenham, The Scramble for Africa, 1876–1912, 1991 (London: Abacus, 2001), 140, 122.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Liaisons Dangereuses, and Juliette
    TOWARDS A THEORY OF LIBERTINE TEMPORALITY: TIME, LEGACY, AND FAILURE IN CLARISSA, LES LIAISONS DANGEREUSES, AND JULIETTE A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2017 Thomas G. Froh School of Arts, Languages and Cultures List of Contents Abstract 4 Declaration 5 Copyright Statement 6 Acknowledgements 7 The Author 8 1 Introduction 9 1.1 Methodology 10 1.1.1 Significance 13 1.1.2 Terms 14 1.1.3 The Four Themes 15 2 Libertine Time in the Eighteenth Century 18 2.1 Pressures of the Moment 18 2.2 Legacy 23 2.3 Pressures of Narration 24 2.3.1 The Libertine Novel 27 2.4 Temporal Articulation 32 2.4.1 Rousseau and Monasticism 35 2.5 Failure 39 3 Moment as Breath: Contextualizing the Eighteenth-Century Libertine 44 3.1 A New Focus on the Present 46 3.2 Changes from the Seventeenth Century 50 3.3 Libertine Literature in the Mid-Eighteenth Century 54 3.4 Shifts in Class 58 3.5 The Evolution of Libertine Temporality 61 3.5.1 Poetry 62 3.5.2 Pornography 68 3.5.3 Theatre 72 4 “This charming clock that runs low”: Lovelace and the Arrival of Death 77 4.1 Note on Editions 77 4.2 Context 79 4.3 Dominance and Submission as Temporal Articulation 85 4.4 Plotting, Legacy, and Futurity 94 4.5 Failure 103 5 “Remember that in your position time is precious”: Temporality in Les Liaisons Dangereuses 115 5.1 Valmont & Lovelace: Parallels 121 5.2 Distinctions between Valmont & Lovelace 134 5.3 Marquise de Merteuil 138 6 All Pleasures Fade: Juliette and the Denial of Narrative 149 6.1 Narrative by Numbers 151 6.2 Juliette’s Failure 159 6.3 Non-Reading 169 2 6.4 Juliette and Futurity 172 Conclusion 177 Bibliography 180 Word Count: 83200 3 Abstract This thesis is a series of textual studies which posits that key libertine characters in the latter half of the eighteenth century possess a cohesive and unique attitude towards time.
    [Show full text]
  • Erotic Bonds Among Women in Victorian Literature
    571 11 DEBORAH LUTZ Erotic Bonds Among Women in Victorian Literature Anne Lister, an early- nineteenth- century lesbian, wrote in her diary about using Byron’s poetry to seduce – or fl irt with – pretty women. 1 She planned to give the fi fth canto of “Childe Harold’s Pilgrimage” (1812) to one young woman, who, when Lister asked her if she liked Byron’s poetry, responded “yes, perhaps too well”; when the girl haunted Lister’s “thoughts like some genius of fairy lore,” she pondered sending her a Cornelian heart with a copy of Byron’s lines on the subject. 2 Women she knew blushed when they “admitted” to having read Don Juan (1819– 1824) and spoke of being “almost afraid” to read Cain (1821). 3 To one of her lovers, Lister read aloud Glenarvon (1816), Lady Caroline Lamb’s melodramatic, fi ctional- ized version of her affair with Byron; they found it a “very dangerous sort of book.” 4 The novel’s heroine cross- dresses, a practice women in Lister’s social circle sometimes used to woo straight women. 5 Lister even played with performing Byronism in her romantic dalliances. 6 Like a bold Byronic hero, she gazed on attractive women with a “penetrating countenance,” and looked “unutterable things” at them, which led them to confess to wishing she “had been a gent.” 7 She tried to “mould” young women “to her purpose,” treating them like toys. 8 But it wasn’t only Byron who pro- vided Lister with ways to act on her own sexual identity. Like many in the nineteenth century who had little access to information about “deviant” types of sexuality, she read classical texts for their descriptions of same- sex desire, especially Juvenal’s Sixth Satire , with its famous lesbian orgy.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Married Nuns in the French Revolution
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Married Nuns in the French Revolution: The Sexual Revolution of the 1790s DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in History by Kathryn Elizabeth Marsden Dissertation Committee: Professor Timothy Tackett, chair Professor Sarah Farmer Professor Ulrike Strasser 2014 © 2014 Kathryn Elizabeth Marsden DEDICATION To my mother, Debora Marsden, who taught me that I could be whatever I wanted to be, and who has supported me every step of the way. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi CURRICULUM VITAE ix ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION xi INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1: Nuns in the Old Regime: Facts and Fictions 15 CHAPTER 2: Religieuses into Citoyennes? Negotiating the Revolution, 51 1789 to 1792 CHAPTER 3: Married Nuns: A New Appraisal 90 CHAPTER 4: Married Nuns: In Their Own Words 124 CONCLUSION 146 BIBLIOGRAPHY 155 APPENDIX 164 iii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1: Le Tiers État marient les Religieux avec les Religieuses (Paris, 1790), 78 Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris. Figure 2: La Discipline Patriotique ou le fanatisme corigé (Paris, 1791), 84 Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris. Figure 3: Map of Marriages by Department 104 iv LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: Number of Marriages by Year 100 Table 2: Ages of Married Nuns in 1792 105 Table 3: Married Nuns by Religious Order 108 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Throughout my graduate career I have benefited from the support of an excellent teacher, advisor, and mentor. Thank you, Tim Tackett. Everyday that I have worked with him has been a challenge and a pleasure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of Seigneur Dildoe: the Figure of the Dildo in Restoration Literature and Culture
    The Rise and Fall of Seigneur Dildoe: The Figure of the Dildo in Restoration Literature and Culture by Sandra A. Friesen B.A., University of Western Ontario, 2005 M.A., University of Western Ontario, 2006 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of English ©Sandra A. Friesen University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permissions of the author. ii The Rise and Fall of Seigneur Dildoe: The Figure of the Dildo in Restoration Literature and Culture by Sandra A. Friesen B.A., University of Western Ontario, 2005 M.A., University of Western Ontario, 2006 Supervisory Committee Dr. Robert Miles, Supervisor Department of English Dr. Eric Miller, Departmental Member Department of English Dr. Andrea McKenzie, Outside Member Department of History iii Abstract Seigneur Dildoe, as this dissertation will contend, was a fixture in Restoration literature and culture (1660-1700). But what was his provenance, by what means did he travel, and why did he come? This dissertation provides a literary history of the fascinating and highly irreverent dildo satire tradition, tracing the dildo satire’s long and winding progress from antiquity to Restoration England, where the tradition reached its early modern zenith. Adding breadth, context, and texture to existing treatments of the trope’s political and sexual potency, this dissertation investigates the dildo satire’s roots in both Greek comedy (Aristophanes, Herodas) and Latin invective (Martial, Juvenal), its influential association in early modern Italy with Catholicism and monastic life (Aretino), and its introduction in early modern England (Nashe), where it cropped up in the works of a surprising number of literary giants (Shakespeare, Jonson, Donne, Marvell).
    [Show full text]
  • The Dangerous Lover Lutz FM 3Rd.Qxp 6/30/2006 2:35 PM Page Ii Lutz FM 3Rd.Qxp 6/30/2006 2:35 PM Page Iii
    Lutz_FM_3rd.qxp 6/30/2006 2:35 PM Page i The Dangerous Lover Lutz_FM_3rd.qxp 6/30/2006 2:35 PM Page ii Lutz_FM_3rd.qxp 6/30/2006 2:35 PM Page iii The Dangerous Lover Gothic Villains, Byronism, and the Nineteenth-Century Seduction Narrative Deborah Lutz The Ohio State University Press Columbus Lutz_FM_3rd.qxp 6/30/2006 2:35 PM Page iv Copyright © 2006 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lutz, Deborah. The dangerous lover : Gothic villains, Byronism, and the nineteenth- century seduction narrative / Deborah Lutz. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8142-1034-5 (alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8142-1034-1 (alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-8142-9111-5 (cd-rom) ISBN-10: 0-8142-9111-2 (cd-rom) 1. English fiction—19th century—History and criticism. 2. Seduction in literature. 3. Love stories, English—History and criticism. 4. Love sto- ries, American—History and criticism. 5. Gothic revival (Literature) 6. Antiheroes in literature. 7. Villains in literature. 8. Romanticism. 9. Byron, George Gordon Byron, Baron, 1788–1824—Influence. I. Title. PR868.S423L87 2006 823'.809352—dc22 2006001265 Cover design by DesignSmith Typeset in Adobe Garamond Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48–1992. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Lutz_FM_3rd.qxp 6/30/2006 2:35 PM Page v Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction ix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • REWIND a Guide to Surveying the First Decade: Video Art and Alternative Media in the U.S., 1968-1980
    REWIND A Guide to Surveying the First Decade: Video Art and Alternative Media in the U.S., 1968-1980 REWIND A Guide to Surveying the First Decade: Video Art and Alternative Media in the U.S., 1968-1980 REWIND 1995 edition Editor: Chris Hill Contributing Editors: Kate Horsfield, Maria Troy Consulting Editor: Deirdre Boyle REWIND 2008 edition Editors: Abina Manning, Brigid Reagan Design: Hans Sundquist Surveying the First Decade: Video Art and Alternative Media in the U.S., 1968–1980 1995 VHS edition Producer: Kate Horsfield Curator: Chris Hill Project Coordinator: Maria Troy Produced by the Video Data Bank in collaboration with Electronic Arts Intermix and Bay Area Video Coalition. Consultants to the project: Deirdre Boyle, Doug Hall, Ulysses Jenkins, Barbara London, Ken Marsh, Leann Mella, Martha Rosler, Steina Vasulka, Lori Zippay. On-Line Editor/BAVC: Heather Weaver Editing Facility: Bay Area Video Coalition Opening & Closing Sequences and On-Screen Titles: Cary Stauffacher, Media Process Group Preservation of Tapes: Bay Area Video Coalition Preservation Supervisor: Grace Lan, Daniel Huertas Special thanks: David Azarch, Sally Berger, Peer Bode, Pia Cseri-Briones, Tony Conrad, Margaret Cooper, Bob Devine, Julia Dzwonkoski, Ned Erwin, Sally Jo Fifer, Elliot Glass, DeeDee Halleck, Luke Hones, Kathy Rae Huffman, David Jensen, Phil Jones, Lillian Katz, Carole Ann Klonarides, Chip Lord, Nell Lundy, Margaret Mahoney, Marie Nesthus, Gerry O’Grady, Steve Seid, David Shulman, Debbie Silverfine, Mary Smith, Elisabeth Subrin, Parry Teasdale, Keiko
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Asian
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Asian/American Bodies in Extremis: Gendering Power, Pleasure, and Nation through “Spectacular” Excess A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English by Melissa Garcia Knoll September 2012 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Traise Yamamoto, Chairperson Dr. Tiffany Ana Lopez Dr. Michelle Raheja Copyright by Melissa Garcia Knoll 2012 The Dissertation of Melissa Garcia Knoll is approved: __________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements Completing this project would not have been possible without the expertise, wisdom, and support of the following wonderful people. I am honored to be indebted to you all. I would be nowhere without Traise Yamamoto, my advisor, my mentor, and my advocate. Thank you for pushing me hard and believing that I was capable of more and better. This project wouldn’t be the same without your experience and insight, and I am grateful to you for sharing both with me. We did it! Thanks to Tiffany Lopez and Michelle Raheja, who are exemplary models of scholarship and personal integrity. Your honesty, encouragement, and savvy advice gave me the strength and confidence to keep plugging away until I made it through. My thanks to the excellent faculty and staff at UCR. I am especially indebted to the incomparable Tina Feldmann, whose timely reminders, gentle suggestions, and wise advice helped me to get every task done on time and well for my entire grad student career. Thanks to Jim Tobias for seeing and nurturing my potential from the beginning. My gratitude also goes to Mariam Lam, who was the first to tell me to recognize myself as a colleague and to stop calling her “Professor” already.
    [Show full text]