Hansard 30 Oct 1996
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
National Policy Implementation in Queensland
National Policy Implementation in Queensland: the Politics of National Competition Policy in the 1990s. Thesis re-submitted by Brett Heyward in July 2004 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Political Science Discipline School of Humanities James Cook University i STATEMENT OF ACCESS I, the undersigned, author of this work, understand that James Cook University will make this thesis available for use within the University Library and, via the Australian Digital Theses network, for use elsewhere. I understand that, as an unpublished work, a thesis has significant protection under the Copyright Act and; I do not wish to place any further restriction on access to this work. _________________________ ______________ Signature Date ELECTRONIC COPY I, the undersigned, the author of this work, declare that the electronic copy of this thesis provided to the James Cook University Library is an accurate copy of the print thesis submitted, within the limits of the technology available. _________________________ ______________ Signature Date Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own work and has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma at any university or other institution of tertiary education. In formation derived from the published work of others has been acknowledged in the text and a list of references given. …………………………………… ……………… (Date) x Table of Contents Page Abstract iv List of Tables vi List of Figures vii Abbreviations viii Chapter One - Introduction 1 Chapter Two – The Policy Environment 64 Chapter Three – The changing context of NCP Implementation in 117 Queensland Chapter Four – The National Competition Council and the 169 implementation of NCP Chapter Five – Case Study Examples 218 Chapter Six – Key Findings and Conclusion 296 Bibliography 332 Appendices Appendix 1 – Analysis of arguments presented by John 345 Quiggin ii Abstract This is a thesis that focuses on the implementation of a national policy platform – the National Competition Policy – by the Queensland Government. -
Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001
Abolition of the Upper House Community Engagement – Updated 27 March 2001 THE ABOLITION OF THE UPPER HOUSE IN QUEENSLAND INTRODUCTION Unicameral legislatures, or legislatures with only one chamber, are uncommon in democracies. It is usually considered that two chambers are necessary for government, and this is the case for the United Kingdom, Canada (at the Federal level) and the United States (Federally, and for all states except Nebraska.) However, some countries, usually small ones, are unicameral. Israel, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, Sweden, and Greece have only one chamber. All the Canadian Provinces, all the Malaysian States and some of the Indian ones, including Assam, are unicameral. Other single-chambered legislatures in the Commonwealth include New Zealand, Ghana, Cyprus, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda, Malta, Malawi, Zambia, Gambia, Guyana, Singapore, Botswana, Zimbabwe and (Western) Samoa. In Australia, the Federal Government has two chambers, as do the governments of all the states, except Queensland. At its separation from New South Wales in 1859, Queensland had two houses of Parliament, the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council. But in a move unique in Australian history, the Legislative Council abolished itself. EARLY DAYS OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, 1860-1890 Queensland, separated from New South Wales in 1859, was the only colony to have a Parliament from its inception. When the Parliament of Queensland was first promulgated in 1860, there were two houses of Parliament. The first members of the Upper House, the Legislative Council, were appointed for five years by the Governor of New South Wales, so that Queensland would not be left permanently with nominees from the Governor of another colony. -
Koala Protection Act Sent to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull
23 May 2016 Australian Press Release: Koala Protection Act sent to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull Koala Foundation The Australian Koala Foundation (AKF) has written to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, Opposition Leader Bill Shorten, Nationals Leader Barnaby Joyce and Greens Leader Richard A.C.N. 010 922 102 Di Natale today to request their support for a Koala Protection Act. The Koala Protection Act is a piece of national legislation that has been formulated by the AKF in consultation with legal teams in Australia and overseas focusing on protecting Koala habitat. Current legislation focuses on the Koala itself but not their habitat. A draft of the Act was enclosed, along with a Statutory Declaration for all leaders to sign prior to the election that states that they will seek to support the Koala via this legislation should they be re-elected. CEO of the AKF Deborah Tabart OAM said that the Act is based on the USA’s Bald Eagle Act that brought the Bald Eagle back from the brink of extinction. She said as Australia’s national icon, the Koala needs the same strength of purpose. “It is not our intention to offend the leaders by requesting they sign a Statutory Declaration, but rather a determination borne of frustration over the AKF’s 30-year experience,” said Ms Tabart. “Since 1988 when I was appointed as CEO of the AKF I have had conversations and correspondence with the who’s who of Australian politics; Environment Ministers at the Federal level and Premiers at the State level."[see notes below] Ms Tabart said the number of Environment Ministers in each State and the Mayors of the 320 Councils in Koala Habitat that she has also corresponded with is too high to remember. -
Legislative Assembly Hansard 1985
Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 5 NOVEMBER 1985 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy 2196 5 November 1985 Reply to Motion of Condolence TUESDAY, 5 NOVEMBER 1985 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. J. H. Waraer, Toowoomba South) read prayers and took the chair at 11 a.m. ASSENT TO BILLS Assent to the following Bills reported by Mr Speaker— Australia Acts (Request) Bill; Rural Lands Protection Bill; Small Claims Tribunals and Dividing Fences Acts Amendment Bill; Private Employment Agencies Act Amendment BUl; Gas Act Amendment Bill; Electricity Supply Industry Employees' Superannuation Restoration Bill; Penalty Units Bill; Police Act Amendment Bill (No. 2); Police (Photographs) Act Amendment Bill. PAPER PRINTED DURING RECESS Mr SPEAKER: I have to report that the following paper was ordered to be printed and circulated during the recess— Report of the Auditor-General on the books and accounts of the Brisbane City CouncU 1984-85. REPORT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY COMMISSIONER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATIONS Mr SPEAKER announced the receipt from the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administrative Investigations of his 1984-85 report. Ordered to be printed. REPLY TO MOTION OF CONDOLENCE Death of Mr E. J. Beardmore, MBE Mr SPEAKER: I have to inform the House that I have received the following letter- 'Rosehill' Station St. George, Q. 4487 20 October, 1985. The Speaker of the Parliament, Hon. J. H. Warner, M.L.A., Parliament House, George Street, BRISBANE, 4000 Dear Mr. Speaker, Would you please convey to the Members of the Parliament our deep appreciation for the Motion of Condolence passed by the Legislative Assembly, Papers 5 November 1985 2197 on the death of our father, Edwin James Beardmore M.B.E. -
Goulburn River National Park and Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve
1 GOULBURN RIVER NATIONAL PARK AND MUNGHORN GAP NATURE RESERVE PLAN OF MANAGEMENT NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service February 2003 2 This plan of management was adopted the Minister for the Environment on 6th February 2003. Acknowledgments: This plan was prepared by staff of the Mudgee Area of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service. The assistance of the steering committee for the preparation of the plan of management, particularly Ms Bev Smiles, is gratefully acknowledged. In addition the contributions of the Upper Hunter District Advisory Committee, the Blue Mountains Region Advisory Committee, and those people who made submissions on the draft plan of management are also gratefully acknowledged. Cover photograph of the Goulburn River by Michael Sharp. Crown Copyright 2003: Use permitted with appropriate acknowledgment. 3 ISBN 0 7313 6947 5 4 FOREWORD Goulburn River National Park, conserving approximately 70 161 hectares of dissected sandstone country, and the neighbouring Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve with its 5 935 hectares of sandstone pagoda formation country, both protect landscapes, biology and cultural sites of great value to New South Wales. The national park and nature reserve are located in a transition zone of plants from the south-east, north-west and western parts of the State. The Great Dividing Range is at its lowest elevation in this region and this has resulted in the extension of many plants species characteristic of further west in NSW into the area. In addition a variety of plant species endemic to the Sydney Sandstone reach their northern and western limits in the park and reserve. -
Australian Agricultural Company IS
INDEX Abbreviations A. A. Co.: Australian Agricultural Company I. S.: Indentured Servant Note: References are to letter numbers not page numbers. A. A. Co.: Annual Accounts of, 936; Annual James Murdoch, 797, 968; Hugh Noble, Report of, 1010; and letter of attorney 779; G. A. Oliver, 822; A. P. Onslow, empowering Lieutenant Colonel Henry 782; George T. Palmer, 789, 874; John Dumaresq to act as Commissioner of, Paul, 848; John Piper, senior, 799, 974; 1107; Quarterly Accounts of, 936; value of James Raymond, 995; separate, for supply property of at 3 April 1833, 980; see also of coal to Colonial Department and to stock in A. A. Co. Commissariat Department, 669, 725, 727; A. A. Co. Governor, London, see Smith, John: Benjamin Singleton, 889; William Smyth, A. A. Co. Stud, 706a, 898, 940d 759; Samuel Terry, 780; Thomas Walker, Aborigines: allegations of outrages against by 784, 811; William Wetherman, 917; T. B. Sir Edward Parry and others in employ of Wilson, 967; Sir John Wylde, 787, 976 A. A. Co., 989, 1011a, 1013; alleged offer ‘Act for preventing the extension of the of reward for heads of, 989; engagement of infectious disease commonly called the as guide for John Armstrong during survey, Scab in Sheep or Lambs’ (3 William IV No. 1025; and murder of James Henderson, 5, 1832) see Scab Act 906; number of, within limits of A. A. Co. Adamant: convicts on, 996, 1073 ‘s original grant, 715; threat from at Port advertisements; see under The Australian; Stephens, 956 Sydney Gazette; Sydney Herald; Sydney accidents, 764a Monitor accommodation: for A. -
Cape Melville Affair Coverage: What Is News? 131
Cape Melville affair coverage: what is news? 131 Cape Melville affair coverage: what is news? David Conley and Geoff Turner Many observers saw coverage of the so-called Cape Melville affair as a post-Fitzgerald litmus test of the Brisbane media’s watchdog duties with a government regarded as popular and competent. But who was watching the watchdogs? Conflicting news judgments could easily be detected on the importance of allega- tions embroiling two of the Premier’s closest confi- dantes. The state Opposition sensed a scandal but a Criminal Justice Commission (CJC) inquiry cleared the Premier’s staff of any wrongdoing. In media circles the story created special interest because those who dis- tributed the “chook feed” were coming under direct public scrutiny by “the chooks”. An examination of the coverage raises questions about the symbiotic relation- ship between government and the media which was canvassed in the 1993 Electoral and Administrative Re- view Commission (EARC) report. N examination of media coverage on a specific issue or controversy often will demonstrate wide variance in Anews values. Sometimes an interpretation of what is newsworthy pivots upon such vagaries as editorial space, staff availability and a plethora of significant public occurrences on a given day. The force of public circumstance makes what is news- worthy one day not newsworthy the next and vice versa. As White (1991, p.21) notes, “news is a creature of infinite variety. Its value changes, according to its audience, its time, its place, its actors and its competition”. When such imponderable effects are 132 Australian Studies in Journalism added as subjectivity, deadlines, defamation concerns, perceived public interest and the interplay of influential personalities in and outside the newsroom, clinical objectivity can become more theory than reality. -
UEENSLAND Polit EFORM GROUP
t Submission No: . L8. UEENSLAND POLiT EFORM GROUP hOUSESTANDINGOF p[p~(( ‘~x~..~; ~, 0738162120 Noel Turner LJ~GA±ANDAPPAJRSCONS P0 Box 563 Booval 4304 Submission ofcorrespondence copies as evidence of activity relating to: •:~ The shredding of the Heiner documents by the authority of the Queensland Government Executive on 23.3.1990, and the following cover-up to date ~• The Lindeberg Grievance submitted by the late MrRobert Greenwood QC This material is circulated to: •~ The H.ouse ofRepresentatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Afairs; “Crime in the Community” (Secretary Gillian Gould •~ The Australian Senate Select Committee on the Lindeberg Grievance (Secretary Alistair Sands ~• Professor Bruce Grundy, Department ofJournalism and Communications, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane. This material is organised in six (6) small folios covering the period from March 1996 (1993) to 1998. Each folio covers an initiative by us ( members of the Queensland Political Reform Group QPRG), and related responses to our initiatives, also supporting extracts of publications and public statements. The OPRG has as its objective , sound and just to all parties resolution of the events leading to the shredding of the Ileiner Inquiry Documents in Queensland on 23 -03 — 1990, and the following and continuing cover-up, and to have this conducted as a lawful and constitutional exercise by Queensland and AustralianPublic Institutions. ) Arrangement ofthe documents, and what they reveal 1. The first folio, docs 1 — 4 , show that OPRG was stating/supporting our view that only a specifically constituted Commission of Inquiry could competently examine the circumstances of the shredding of the Heiner Inquiry Documents, the following cover-up and political denials. -
Hansard 8 Sep 2000
8 Sep 2000 Legislative Assembly 3197 FRIDAY, 8 SEPTEMBER 2000 Queensland's export earnings. But it is an Aussie company that took the risk and the initiative in the first place and I want to congratulate Bindaree Beef, its Chairman John Mr SPEAKER (Hon. R. K. Hollis, Redcliffe) MacDonald and the board of directors for read prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. putting their faith—and their money—in this project. I met with them; they are very decent Australians. I would particularly single out PETITIONS Leigh Belbeck, the human resources The Clerk announced the receipt of the manager, who has invested a great deal of following petitions— time and effort to make today possible. Bindaree has assured us the minimum work force will initially comprise 230 people, with Water (Allocation and Management) Bill plans to expand capacity over the next four From Mr Malone (62 petitioners) years and so create more jobs. requesting the House to delay the passage of In supporting this venture through active the Water (Allocation and Management) Bill and constructive Government assistance, my until an assessment of the impacts are Government is fulfilling two key policy investigated and not until industry is consulted priorities—job creation in sustainable export as to these impacts. industries and rebuilding regional Queensland. In the last year export revenue from the meat industry increased to over $1.3 billion. This Synergy Industrial Park makes it the State's second largest export From Dr Watson (2,554 petitioners) after coal, contributing about half of Australia's requesting the House to abandon the total export earnings from the meat industry. -
Mark Lauchs Thesis
‘Rational Avoidance of Accountability by Queensland Governments’ Mark Adam Lauchs LL.B., BA (Hons.) School of Justice Law Faculty QUT PhD Thesis 2006 Keywords: Queensland History, Public Sector Ethics, Accountability, Public Service, Anthony Downs, Public Choice Theory, Public Service Reform, Freedom of Information, Whistleblowers, Integrity Commissioner, Criminal Justice Commission, Electoral and Administrative Review Commission, Public Service Commissioner. Abstract: Anthony Downs public choice theory proposes that every rational person would try to meet their own desires in preference to those of others, and that such rational persons would attempt to obtain these desires in the most efficient manner possible. This thesis submits that the application of this theory would mean that public servants and politicians would perform acts of corruption and maladministration in order to efficiently meet their desires. As such action is unavoidable, political parties must appear to meet the public demand for accountability systems, but must not make these systems viable lest they expose the corruption and maladministration that would threaten the government’s chance or re-election. The thesis demonstrates this hypothesis through a study of the history of the public sector in Queensland. It shows that all governments have displayed a commitment for accountability whilst simultaneously ensuring the systems would not be able to interfere with government control or expose its flaws. Table of Contents: Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background: the -
18 February 2016
United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project 11.3.16 WLALC Feedback ‐ 18 February 2016 GC01 Page | 233 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 234 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project 11.3.17 Archaeological Test Excavation Comments ‐ United response to PCWP GC01 Page | 235 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project 11.3.18 Archaeological Test Excavation Comments ‐ United response to WLALC GC01 Page | 236 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project 11.3.19 Peer review of OzArk report GC01 Page | 237 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 238 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 239 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 240 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 241 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project 11.3.20 Tocumwal Response to Peer Review GC01 Page | 242 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 243 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 244 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 245 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project 11.3.21 Glencore Response to PCWP 1st June Letter GC01 Page | 246 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 247 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 248 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 249 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project 11.3.22 Response from PCWP GC01 Page | 250 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project 11.3.23 Feedback from WNAC GC01 Page | 251 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 252 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 253 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project GC01 Page | 254 United Wambo Open Cut Coal Project 11.4 Plains Clans of the Wonnarua Peoples ACHAR GC01 Page | 255 GLENCORE UNITED COLLIERIES ABORIGINAL CULTRAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT Company Glencore Coal Assets Australia Contact Aislinn Farnon Date 21 October 2015 Integrating Landscape Science & Aboriginal Culture Knowledge For Our Sustainable Future Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... -
The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
14 . The demise of the Coalition and the Nationals governing alone, 1981–1983 In 1980, backroom plans had been already entertained for a stand-alone National Party government supplemented by a few Liberal ‘ministerialists’— opportunists who would cross over and side with whatever the next ministry turned out to be in order to remain part of the next government. Historically, ‘ministerialists’ were typically senior parliamentarians who, forgoing party loyalties, decided to collaborate as individuals in the formulation of a new government. After the 1980 election, however, any such musing was put on hold as the two conservative parties lapsed back into coalition. This time, the Nationals clearly imposed their dominance, taking the prime portfolios and consigning the ‘leftovers’ to the Liberals. Labor began to refer to the junior partners as ‘Dr Edwards and his shattered Liberal team’—the losers who were ‘now completely the captive of the National Party’ (QPD 1981:vol. 283, p. 7). Despite his vitriolic attacks against the Premier and the National-led government, Llew Edwards retained his position as Deputy Premier and Treasurer—positions he would keep until he was deposed by Terry White on the eve of the Coalition collapse in August 1983, although there was an unsuccessful attempt by dissident Liberals to remove Edwards in November 1981. When the Premier learned about the dissident Liberal plan to topple Edwards, with Angus Innes taking the lead, he declared Innes an ‘anti-coalitionist’ and someone with whom he would not work. Instead, Bjelke-Petersen began hatching plans to form a minority government with whomsoever among the Liberals who would give him support; and then to govern alone until mid-1982.