Open Space Strategy 2014 - 2028

Foreword

Councillor Robert McCardle Cabinet Member Planning and Business Enterprise

I am pleased to introduce the second Open Space Strategy for South Staffordshire. It aims to build on the successes from the previous strategy and looks at future ways to provide the open spaces that the district’s residents and visitors deserve.

Open spaces provide essential facilities for all kinds of recreational activity, aid people’s health and wellbeing, assist in supporting the economy, mitigate the impacts of climate change and are part of the solution to flooding.

In short, they are vitally important in creating sustainable places and sustainable communities as well as providing a wealth of other environmental benefits.

It is therefore necessary to ensure that open space considerations form part of the Council’s strategic planning work. We have recently completed a major piece of work on the provision of indoor and outdoor sports facilities.

That work is complementary to this Open Space Strategy and, together they will contribute to a Supplementary Planning Document on Open Space, Sport and Recreation that supports policies in the Local Plan.

Only by careful strategic planning can we make sure that existing open spaces are safeguarded and enhanced and that new sites are provided through the development management process.

We have set an ambitious but achievable set of challenges that will be met through the implementation of this strategy. Over the course of the next 15 years, we will meet these challenges and deliver the vision for open spaces in South Staffordshire.

Foreword

Councillor Mrs Mary Bond Cabinet Member Community Services

Open spaces are one of the most visible services the Council provides. They are part and parcel of South Staffordshire’s villages and contribute very significantly to quality of life. They provide opportunities for all types of recreation by people of all ages along with providing ‘green lungs’ within urban environments and play a major role in tackling issues such as climate change and flooding. Additionally, within the district, there are major areas of natural greenspace that is vital in supporting wildlife along with a number of publicly accessible historic parklands.

It is of the utmost importance that we protect and enhance our sites and assist partners to do the same so that residents and visitors can continue to benefit from all the different types of open space on offer. However, we also need to make sure that the way we look after our open spaces is appropriate and can meet community needs. We will seek to strike a balance between the needs of residents and the importance of meeting our biodiversity duty. This is why it is important to draw up a strategy that provides the basis for managing sites in a consistent way with their day-to-day maintenance being carried out in accordance with a set of strategic aims.

This Open Space Strategy links closely to the Council Plan and the Sustainable Community Strategy and provides the basis for ensuring open spaces across South Staffordshire are of high quality, accessible and valued by all. The Council is determined to ensure that it makes the best of the district’s open spaces, now and in the future, for the benefit of its residents and visitors.

Contents

Introduction 7

1 An Open Space Strategy for South Staffordshire 9 The structure of this document 9 Timescales 9

2 A vision for open space in South Staffordshire 10 Background 10 Why prepare an open space strategy? 10 Scope of the strategy 12

3 Context 14 About South Staffordshire 14 South Staffordshire’s landscape character 15 Community characteristics 15 Settlement hierarchy 19 South Staffordshire localities 21 International Policy context 22 The European Landscape Convention 22 National Policy context 23 The National Planning Policy Framework (2012) 23 The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature (2011) 24 The Localism Act 2011 25 Healthy Lives, Healthy People (2011) 25 Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 25 Other guidance relevant to South Staffordshire 26 Blue Sky Green Space: Understanding the Contribution Parks and Green Spaces can make to Improving People’s Lives (2011) 26 Green Infrastructure Guidance (Natural England) 26 Local Green Infrastructure: Helping communities make the most of their landscape 26 Accessible Natural Green Space Standards (2010) 26 Local Policy Context 27 South Staffordshire Core Strategy (Local Plan Development Plan Document) 27 South Staffordshire Council Plan 2012-2016 27 South Staffordshire Sustainable Community Strategy 2008-2020 27 South Staffordshire Sports Facilities and Playing Pitch Strategy 2012-2028 27 South Staffordshire Energy and Our Local Environment Framework 2012-2017 28 South Staffordshire Conservation Area Appraisals and Management Plans (2010) 28 Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Management Plan 2014-2019 28 Other South Staffordshire Council initiatives of relevance to open space 29 South Staffordshire Community Safety Partnership 29 South Staffordshire Locality Commissioning Partnership 29

4 Current open space provision 30 New Sites and Sites Subject to Improvement 30 Re-assessment of Sites – Approach and Methodology 30 Re-assessment Results Summary 31 Quantity 31 Quality 32 Accessibility 32 Value 33 Site Assessment Results 33 Setting Local Provision Standards 33 Amenity Greenspace 34 Quantity of Provision 35 Quality 36 Value 36 Young People and Children 38 Quantity of Provision 39 Quality 40 Value 41 Cemeteries and Churchyards 42 Quantity of Provision 42 Quality 43 Value 44 Civic and Heritage Spaces 45 Quantity of Provision 45 Quality 46 Value 47 Natural and Semi-Natural Greenspace 48 Quantity of Provision 48 Quality 49 Value 50 Green Corridors 51 Quantity of Provision 51 Quality 52 Value 53 Allotments 54 Quantity of Provision 54 Quality 55 Value 55 Historic Parks and Gardens 57 Quantity of Provision 58 Quality 59 Value 59

5 Delivering the vision 61 Ensuring the Right Quantity, Quality and Value – how standards will be used to deliver and manage open spaces 61 Quantity 61 Quantitative Planning Standards for future open space provision 62 Open spaces not suitable for Quantitative Planning Standards 64

Quality 65 Value 65 Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards (ANGSt) 65 The South Staffordshire Standards 68 Amenity Greenspace 68 Young Children’s Provision 69 Provision for Older Children and Young People 70 Cemeteries and Churchyards 70 Civic and Heritage Spaces 71 Natural and Semi-Natural Greenspace 72 Green Corridors 73 Allotments 74 Historic Parks and Gardens 75 Effective Strategic Planning for Open Space 75 Open Space within the Development Management Process 76 Developer guidance on Open Space Standards to be delivered through new development 77 Calculating the number of bed spaces created by a development 79 Open space Quality and Value in new development 82 Green Infrastructure 82 Open Space Management and Maintenance 83 Health and Wellbeing 86 Water Management 87 Open Space and the Economy 88 Priorities and Performance Monitoring 90

6 Action plan 91 Environmental Quality 91 Housing 93 Economic Vibrancy 94 Community Safety 96 Health and Wellbeing 97 Young People and Children 98

References and additional bibliography 101

List of Figures 1. Document links 13 2. South Staffordshire’s regional context 14 3. Population – children and young people 17 4. Population – over 19s and those of working age 18 5. Population – older people 19 6. Settlement hierarchy 20 7. Locality structure 22 8. Major open spaces and linkages 67 9. Investment in Green Infrastructure Logic Chain 89

Appendices 1. Quality and Value Site Assessment Sheet Templates

2. Quality Scoring Definitions and Value Assessment Criteria 3. Open Space Comparator Standards 4. Open Space Audit Site Assessment Results 5. Approach to Catchments and Standards 6. Open Space Consultation: Parish Council Responses 7. Open Space Consultation: Other Responses 8. South Staffordshire Tree and Woodland Strategy

Introduction

The South Staffordshire Open Space Strategy is the second such strategy for the district. It updates and replaces the previous strategy published in 2008 and aims to be aspirational but sufficiently realistic. The document sets out the Council’s vision for open space and demonstrates the importance of providing a broad range of good quality, accessible open spaces for the district’s residents and visitors. The strategy makes the case that the provision of open spaces that meet the needs of local communities is not a luxury but a necessity. It clearly demonstrates the links to the Council’s Priorities and those of its partners covering a range of agendas including housing, environment, economy, community cohesion and health and wellbeing.

Importantly, the Open Space Strategy provides a key document in the preparation of an Open Space, Sport and Recreation Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) as part of the Council’s strategic planning process. It also provides the policy basis for improvement of existing open spaces by the Council and its partners and contributes to the drive to place customer needs at the heart of everything the Council does.

A detailed audit of all open spaces in the district has been completed and the results are set out as part of this strategy. This updates the Open Space Audit carried out in 2008.

As part of completing the Audit, wide ranging community consultation took place in September-December 2013 to seek local views on the open spaces in our district. The Audit was informed by the consultation and used to provide the background to the preparation of the Council’s Open Space Strategy.

Please note, this Open Space Strategy is still draft, and is now subject to further consultation. The comments received to the consultation will be used to amend the strategy, where appropriate, before the Council formally adopts it as Council policy.

The Open Space Audit and Strategy processes aim to deliver:

 Networks of accessible, high quality open spaces and sport and recreational facilities within the villages which meet local needs including those of outdoor play, are valued by the community, are fit for purpose, take account of landscape character, landscape capacity and of nature conservation and biodiversity issues and are economically and environmentally sustainable.

 An appropriate balance between new provision and the enhancement of existing provision. Consideration will be given to the protection and management of sites that are close to their landscape or nature conservation capacity.

 Clarity and reasonable certainty for developers and landowners in respect of the requirements and expectations in relation to open space provision and contributions associated with the development of land.

These aims were first set out in the previous Open Space Strategy but are equally relevant in the context of the Council’s current Local Plan. There are also wider links to the Council’s work beyond just the planning process, namely:

 Supporting rural renewal

 Promoting social inclusion and community cohesion

 Promoting health and well being

 Green infrastructure

 Encouraging inward investment

 Supporting the local economy

This Open Space Strategy is being drawn up together with an Indoor and Outdoor Sports Facilities Study. Together, these documents will be combined to form a comprehensive Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) in relation to open space, sport and recreation.

The strategy includes an action plan identifying objectives that will enable the vision for open space to be achieved and provide for joined-up thinking and collaboration with key partners. It is intended that partners will also share the vision.

Over the next fifteen years, implementation of the Open Space Strategy will ensure that community needs are met and that South Staffordshire has a strong network of high quality open spaces that are well-used and valued by the community, are attractive to wildlife and contribute to local green infrastructure.

91% of people believe that public parks and open spaces improve their quality of life.

CABE (2004)

1. An Open Space Strategy for South Staffordshire

The structure of this document

This Open Space Strategy performs a number of functions but essentially, it can be separated into two separate but linked parts. Firstly, it has a significant role in planning and development management and will form part of the Council’s Open Space, Sport and Recreation Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) linked to the Core Strategy Local Plan. This will provide the framework for the strategic planning of new open space and its provision as part of new housing development in the district.

The second function of the strategy is to provide a tool for the management and improvement of the Council’s existing open spaces along with those that come forward through the planning process. Within this, it provides the basis for partnership working and as a way of assisting partner organisations to better manage their land against the background of shared aims and objectives for open space and green infrastructure.

Links between open space and the Council’s Priorities are a ‘golden thread’ running through this strategy, encompassing both its planning and management functions.

The chapters within this document can be grouped under three main headings:

- Where do we want to be? - Where are we now? - How are we going to get to where we want to be?

Chapters One and Two set out the Council’s vision and aspirations for open space – ‘where do we want to be?’; Chapters Three and Four provide the policy and local community context and the current picture in relation to open space – ‘Where are we now?’ and; subsequent chapters set out a ‘road map’ for how the vision will be achieved, set within the South Staffordshire context. This includes an action plan with timescales, lead partners and resource requirements all set out within it along with how each action links to a particular policy or theme.

This Strategy is both a technical document for internal use and a means of communicating the Council’s approach to open space provision more widely to the general public and those whose work includes consideration of open space. It is a key document supporting local planning policies and therefore has a crucial role in the strategic planning and development management processes.

Trees and woodlands are important components of open space and are therefore closely linked to the aims of this strategy. Consequently, a Tree and Woodland Strategy forms part of the wider Open Space Strategy and is therefore appended to this document.

Timescales

Typically, a strategy of this type has a 5 year timescale but it must align with the Council’s Core Strategy Local Plan timescale and be consistent with the Council’s Indoor and Outdoor Sports Facilities Study both of which run up to 2028. Therefore, whilst the Open Space Strategy also has a timescale up to 2028, the action plan will be reviewed every 5 years in order to respond to the creation of new partnerships and any changes in the funding landscape.

2. A vision for open space in South Staffordshire

Background

Good quality open spaces are essential elements of the places where people live and make a significant contribution to quality of life within communities. An Open Space Strategy enables the Council to plan for and manage open spaces strategically in order to fully realise their economic, social and environmental benefits.

Having an open space strategy in place will allow the Council to manage and maintain its own open spaces against a set of strategic aims and objectives and to ensure new sites are appropriately designed and laid out as part of the development planning process. It will also provide the basis for working in partnership with other relevant organisations. In delivering the strategy, it will be important to achieve the right balance between providing places for people whilst at the same time, allowing nature to flourish within the district’s villages.

The previous Open Space Strategy was published in 2009 and this followed the detailed research and consultation associated with the undertaking of an Open Space Audit in 2008. The strategy was the Council’s response to the Audit’s findings. The South Staffordshire Local Plan Core Strategy includes a commitment to the preparation of a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) on Open Space, Sport and Recreation and to produce a comprehensive strategy for indoor and outdoor sports. The preparation of an Open Space Strategy is a key part of this process and will therefore form part of the SPD.

Consequently, the Council has recently looked again at open spaces within the district through a detailed audit in order to assess the impact of the 2009 Open Space Strategy. As with the previous audit the process also included consultation and extensive fieldwork.

The Open Space Strategy sets out the Council’s vision for the provision and enhancement of open spaces in South Staffordshire by clearly explaining how open spaces will be provided and looked after. This includes considerations of quantity, quality and value. The vision will be implemented through an action plan that that is supported by the Council, key partners and local communities. The strategy will therefore work at an operational level, whilst also being a strategic plan so needs to be fully integrated with a number of key Council policies and strategies. This is explored in more detail in Chapter 5.

Why prepare an open space strategy?

Open spaces, sport and recreation facilities are multi-functional, providing a number of important roles both within the urban fabric of the district’s villages and in the wider countryside. The benefits of open space are numerous and wide-ranging, making a very significant contribution to:

 Reinforcing local distinctiveness and fostering a sense of community ownership and pride.  The physical character of an area, helping to shape existing and future development and creating a sense of place.  Improving social inclusion and community cohesion.

 Providing connected routes for wildlife, recreation, walking and cycling and safer routes to schools.  Protecting and enhancing biodiversity and ecological habitats.  Green infrastructure.  Providing specific facilities for children and young people.  Aiding economic regeneration through attracting inward investment.  Increased tourism, leisure and cultural activities, aiding economic regeneration.  Protecting the intrinsic historical and cultural character of places.  Providing educational opportunities for all ages and abilities.  Promoting the opportunities for outdoor-based work experience.  Climate change adaption and flood alleviation.

Functions and benefits vary depending upon the type of open space, with some performing more than one function, such as outdoor sports facilities which have an amenity value as well as facilitating sport and recreation activities.

CABE Space’s ‘Value of Public Space’ identifies a variety of functions and benefits of open spaces, including:

 Economic value - a high-quality public environment can help to attract inward investment, increase tourism and stimulate the housing market.

 Improved physical and mental health - open spaces provide opportunities for relaxation and outdoor activities, such as walking and sport, which can help to reduce stress and ill-health.

 Benefits for children and young people - good-quality open spaces provide essential opportunities for fun, exercise and learning, as well as allowing children to experience the natural environment.

 Reducing crime and fear of crime - improved management and quality of public open spaces, such as adding additional lighting, can help to improve safety and security, allowing people to enjoy these spaces without fear of crime.

 Social value - public open spaces provide meeting places, which bring communities together and shape the cultural identity of an area.

 Encouraging movement - well-designed public spaces encourage walking and cycling, and have the power to improve the safety of our environment by reducing vehicle speeds and use.

 Biodiversity value – semi-natural habitats and their wildlife provide an opportunity to be close to nature, as well as bringing environmental benefits to urban areas, such as the cooling of air and the absorption of atmospheric pollutants.

 Green Infrastructure - open spaces contribute to the district’s Green Infrastructure by providing a network of green spaces that link the villages with the wider rural area.

Changing social and economic circumstances, changing work and leisure practices, more sophisticated consumer tastes and higher public expectations have placed new demands on open spaces. They need to be of high quality and appropriate to meet aspirations.

Successful, thriving and prosperous communities are characterised by streets, parks and open spaces that are clean, safe and attractive – areas that local people are proud of and want to spend their time in.

Living Places: Cleaner, Safer, Greener (2006)

There have been significant changes to the planning process, not least the replacement of Planning Policy Statements and Planning Policy Guidance Notes with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). This has condensed the many guidance documents into a one smaller policy framework.

The NPPF aims to provide the circumstances in which planning contributes to boosting the nation’s economy but balances this against the need to safeguard the environment and take social factors into account.

It is also important for the strategy to align with the Council’s Priorities, the Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) and support local planning policies. This will provide the framework for increased cross-departmental and partnership working and integration with strategic planning policy. Ultimately, it will lead to high quality, accessible public spaces that have wide use and are highly valued by local communities.

The strategy will act as a vehicle for improved open space management, planning strategically for open space provision and considering open space requirements as part of the development management process. In preparing an Open Space Strategy, the Council is seeking to provide for the protection and creation of a network of high quality open spaces.

The Council prepares and publishes an Open Space Strategy in order to:

 Set out a vision for open space provision in South Staffordshire  Provide the framework for the provision of new open space and the improvement of existing open spaces through the strategic and development management processes  Ensure open spaces are fulfilling community needs  Ensure open spaces contribute to the Council’s Priorities and those of partner organisations  Provide a benchmark against which to improve open spaces  Meet the requirements of national legislation and best practice guidance

Scope of the strategy

This strategy sets out mechanisms for addressing all issues relating to open spaces of all types within South Staffordshire. This includes all types of green space and civic space. Civic spaces can be defined as being predominantly hard surfaced, usually found in village centres and are formal in nature, often focussed around war memorials or public art installations.

As already referred to, this Open Space Strategy is being produced to provide both strategic planning and land management functions. Once the final strategy is published

following consultation, it will include a detailed action plan linked to the Council’s Priorities, the planning process and the Sustainable Community Strategy.

The Open Space Strategy exists alongside the Council’s work on indoor and outdoor sports provision and, as previously referred to, incorporates a Tree and Woodland Strategy. Together, all of these documents will be brought together within one Supplementary Planning Document, supporting Local Plan Core Policy 14: Open Space, Sport and Recreation.

Open Space Audit

Indoor and Outdoor Open Space Strategy Sports Facilities Strategy

Tree and Woodland Strategy Open Space, Sport and Recreation SPD

Individual site management plans

Fig.1 Document links

3. Context

About South Staffordshire

South Staffordshire is a rural district situated on the north western edge of the West Midlands conurbation. It has an area of 101,000 acres (40,400 hectares) and has a population of 108,100. Much of South Staffordshire lies within the West Midlands Green Belt – 32,310 hectares (80%) and the remainder to the north of the Green Belt boundary is defined as ‘Open Countryside’.

South Staffordshire is the southernmost of the ten Staffordshire authorities including the City of Stoke-on-Trent, and adjoins the County Town of Stafford and the Market Town of Cannock. The District adjoins the Major Urban Area of the West Midlands Conurbation and is very close to the Black Country towns of Dudley and Walsall and the City of Wolverhampton. The District also shares its boundaries with Shropshire and the towns of Bridgnorth and Telford to the west, and with the County of Worcestershire to the south.

South Staffordshire is privileged to contain and be in close proximity to large expanses of publicly accessible open space. This includes general amenity green space, green corridors, natural & semi-natural spaces, historic parks & gardens, facilities for children & young people, civic spaces, cemeteries & Churchyards and allotments.

The sub-headings within this section of the strategy are explored in more detail in later chapters.

Fig.2 South Staffordshire’s regional context

South Staffordshire’s landscape character

The rich and varied landscape of South Staffordshire is predominantly based on a pattern of trees, hedgerows and small woods. In the latter centuries, many trees and hedgerows have been removed due to developments in agricultural activity and mineral extraction. Substantial areas of lowland heath have given way to forestry and woodland. There has been a rapid expansion in settlements since the Second World War and this has affected the character of the landscape. The planting associated with the many historic parklands and gardens is acknowledged as an important feature of the district.

The extensive areas of open land are used by the populous of the surrounding areas with the district often being classed as the ‘playground’ of the conurbation. There are numerous golf courses, riding schools and stables in the countryside and sports pitches on the fringe of the conurbation. The widespread footpaths and bridleways combined with the canals, rivers, ponds, lakes and reservoirs give informal access to the countryside and opportunities for water sports, nature conservation, education and tourism.

Within South Staffordshire District there are a number of areas designated with additional protective status, as a reflection of their importance. These include 11 Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), 4 Registered Commons, 193 Sites of Biological Importance (96 of which are Grade 1), and 1 National Nature Reserve (NNR). Part of Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) is also located within the district and this is afforded special, statutory, protection. In addition, there are a number of ancient woodlands and hedgerows. Together, these provide important habitats for significant plant and animal species, including water voles, otters and bog bush-crickets. Further details relating to the biodiversity of the district can be found in the Staffordshire Biodiversity Action Plan and the South Staffordshire Local Plan (Core Strategy) adopted in 2012.

Community characteristics

The latest figures show a general increase in the population of the district although some wards have seen a decline in numbers. This is shown in the table below, which is based on the 2011 census information.

Furthermore, projections up to 2028 show a population increase of 5700 from 106,800 (in 2010) to 112,500. This represents a 5.3% increase in South Staffordshire’s population and therefore, the quantity of open space needs to be sufficient to meet the needs of this growth in the number of people living in the district. The 2008 Audit used a population projection at the time that suggested the number of people living in the district would actually decrease by 996 from 105,896 (in 2001) to 104900 (by 2029). This minor change would have had a negligible impact in terms of the requirements for open space provision and the local provision standards set out in the 2008 Audit would have been sufficiently robust to cope with this change.

Ward 2001 2011 Change Perton Dippons 2,002 1,990 -12 Himley & Swindon 1,994 2,033 39 Penkridge West 2,138 2,049 -89 Trysull & Seisdon 2,075 2,225 150 Pattingham & Patshull 2,229 2,246 17 Perton East 2,379 2,279 -100 Penkridge North East & Acton Trussell 3,579 3,795 216 Cheslyn Hay South 4,017 3,837 -180 Wombourne South East 3,883 3,847 -36 Codsall North 4,036 4,050 14 Codsall South 3,952 4,115 163 Wheaton Aston, Bishops Wood & Lapley 3,963 4,127 164 Cheslyn Hay North & Saredon 4,221 4,285 64 Bilbrook 4,077 4,330 253 Penkridge South East 4,480 4,505 25 Wombourne South West 4,739 4,742 3 Great Wyrley Landywood 4,986 4,917 -69 Essington 4,831 4,957 126 Huntington & Hatherton 4,472 5,137 665 Featherstone & Shareshill 5,634 5,741 107 Great Wyrley Town 6,250 6,143 -107 Perton Lakeside 6,737 6,417 -320 Wombourne North & Lower Penn 6,043 6,566 523 Brewood & Coven 6,374 6,573 199 Kinver 6,805 7,225 420 Table 1 Population changes 2001-2011

Some of the decreases are significant and mean that the quantity of open space is sufficient to meet current needs. Where the population has significantly increased, open space provision must therefore also increase in order to maintain the local standards of provision. In the case of a number of wards, population increase is a result of major new housing development that has included new open space as part of that development. However, other wards have seen increases based on a number of smaller developments that have not been able to accommodate on-site open space. Consequently, there is likely to be a requirement for additional open space and/or improved sites to cope with the extra demand. This is examined further in Chapter 5 of this strategy.

In planning for its open spaces, the Council also gives consideration to the population demographic. For instance, the district has an increasingly ageing population so open space needs to be able to accommodate the needs of the whole of its population but with reference to the particular age groups that will be subject to growth across the plan period. The charts below indicate the population projections from 2010 up to and including 2028, with the information separated into different age-groups.

7,000 2010 2011 6,000 2012 2013 2014 5,000 2015 2016

4,000 2017 2018 2019 3,000 2020 2021 2022 2,000 2023 2024 2025 1,000 2026 2027

0 2028 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19

Fig.3 Population - children and young people

10,000 2010 9,000 2011 2012 8,000 2013 2014 7,000 2015 2016 6,000 2017 2018 5,000 2019 2020 4,000 2021 2022 3,000 2023 2024 2,000 2025

1,000 2026 2027

0 2028 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69

Fig.4 Population - over 19s and those of working age

8,000

2010

7,000 2011 2012 2013 6,000 2014 2015

5,000 2016 2017 2018 4,000 2019 2020 3,000 2021 2022 2023 2,000 2024 2025 1,000 2026 2027 2028 0 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 90+

Fig.5 Population - older people

Settlement hierarchy

The Core Strategy identifies a hierarchy of settlements within the district based on main service villages, local service villages, small service villages and other villages and hamlets.

The Council’s Core Strategy sets out that the majority of development and service provision should be focused on the Main Service Villages. These villages are considered to be the most sustainable locations in terms of essential community facilities and services available, access to public transport and supporting infrastructure, including green infrastructure.

In the Local Service Villages, the focus is on limited growth aimed at meeting local needs. These villages have a more limited range of essential community facilities but are considered capable of sustaining limited development. The focus will be on maintaining and enhancing existing local facilities including green infrastructure.

The focus for the Small Service Villages is on very limited development for the provision of rural affordable housing with an emphasis very much on meeting only local need. It is

likely that any development in these settlements will be delivered through rural exception sites.

The Other Villages and Hamlets in the district have very limited, if any community facilities and services and generally, therefore, rely on the larger villages for these. Consequently, it is not considered that these settlements are suitable locations for development, with perhaps, the delivery of rural exception sites and the re-use of redundant rural buildings.

The provision of open space related to new development must, therefore link directly to the spatial plan for South Staffordshire. In broad, general terms, new open space provision will follow the hierarchical approach set out in the Core Strategy as it will be directly associated with new development.

Fig.6 Settlement hierarchy

South Staffordshire localities

The nature and geography of South Staffs lends itself to work on a locality basis. The Council has been working with partners in the South Staffordshire Partnership to establish the principle of ‘locality working’ in order to further develop service delivery across the district. A locality model has been developed and five locality areas have been defined, based on parish boundaries and electoral divisions and these are shown on the following map.

The key benefits of locality working are:

 Service providers engaging at a local level  Making services better tailored to local needs  Partners working together and agreeing local issues  Identifying and fixing the little things in a specific area  Providing a voice for each locality  Strengthening communication/understanding and awareness

The Core Strategy and therefore this Open Space Strategy seeks to address the issues and challenges identified above and sets out a local spatial strategy that will deliver change within each of the locality areas and that is distinctive to South Staffordshire. Following extensive consultation with local elected members and community groups, and having assessed data for each locality collected from partners and national sources, a series of Locality Delivery Plans has been developed. The Locality Delivery Plans highlight key priority projects that will benefit from partnership commitment and these will be over and above the work that is currently being delivered within the locality areas. Further information about the Locality Delivery Plans can be found on the LSP website at www.lsp.sstaffs.gov.uk

Fig.7 Locality structure

International policy context

The European Landscape Convention (ELC)

Signed by the UK Government in 2006, the ELC became binding from March 2007. It applies to all landscapes, towns and villages as well as open countryside; the coast and inland areas; ordinary or even degraded landscapes as well as those that are afforded statutory protection. The ELC was reaffirmed through the Natural Environment White Paper in June 2011.

The ELC defines landscape as: “An area as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors”. (Council of Europe 2000)

It highlights the importance of developing landscape policies dedicated to the protection, management and creation of landscapes and establishing procedures for the general

public and other stakeholders to participate in policy creation and implementation. It commits all signatories to:

 Recognise landscape in law  Establish and implement policies aimed at landscape protection, management and planning  Establish procedures for the participation of the public and local authorities  Integrate landscape into planning policies and into cultural, environmental, agricultural, social and economic policies

National policy context

The National Planning Policy Framework (2012)

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was published in March 2012; the aim being to put local communities more in touch with the planning system by condensing over 1000 pages of national guidance into a document of around only 50 pages. The NPPF seeks to deliver a positive, proactive planning system that regulates the use of land but with less bureaucracy. The NPPF therefore sets out the Government’s planning policies for England and how these are expected to be applied. The key changes from the previous suite of guidance are:

 A presumption in favour of sustainable development – making the default answer ‘yes’. The document sets out the three dimensions to sustainable development, these being economic, social and environmental  Changes to the plan making system that aim to increase local stakeholder involvement  A commitment to increased housing delivery, including a requirement to identify more land  Greater flexibility in the approach to the Green Belt, renewables and the historic environment

The NPPF replaces and revokes previous national policy guidance including the suite of Planning Policy Guidance Notes (PPGs) and Planning Policy Statements (PPSs), the following of which were relevant to open spaces:

 PPS 1 Delivering Sustainable Development and supplement to PPS 1: Planning and Climate Change  PPG 2 Green Belts  PPS 3 Housing  PPS 5 Planning for the Historic Environment  PPS 9 Biodiversity and Geological Conservation  PPS 12 Local Spatial Planning  PPS 25 Development and Flood Risk

And perhaps most significantly

 PPG 17 Open Space, Sport and Recreation

PPG 17 provided detailed guidance on the planning for and consideration of open space, sport and recreation matters as part of the planning system. The Council’s Open Space

Audit published in 2008 was undertaken in accordance with the guidance in PPG 17 and its companion guide – Assessing Needs and Opportunities.

In terms of open space, the NPPF covers this in Section 8 - Promoting Healthy Communities. The document sets out that local planning policies and decisions should:

“plan positively for the provision and use of shared space … to enhance the sustainability of communities and residential environments”.

Further, it requires that:

“Planning policies should be based on robust and up-to-date assessments of the needs for open space, sports and recreation facilities and opportunities for new provision. The assessments should identify specific needs and quantitative or qualitative deficits or surpluses of open space, sports and recreational facilities in the local area. Information gained from the assessments should be used to determine what open space, sports and recreational provision is required”.

The NPPF does not specify particular requirements relating to local standards of provision and the onus is very much on individual local authorities to determine these and make appropriate decisions with regard to this. More information on the standards set out as part of this strategy, can be found in Chapter 5.

As some open spaces (such as Shoal Heath Common, Teddesley Park and Hatherton Park) contribute to the landscape of the AONB, it is also important to note that paragraph 109 of the NPPF requires the protection and enhancement of valued landscapes.

The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature (2011)

The Natural Environment White Paper, The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature, published by Defra in June 2011, outlines the Government’s vision for the natural environment over the next 50 years, along with practical action to deliver that ambition.

The Natural Choice is the first White Paper on the natural environment in 20 years, and is directly linked to the recently published National Ecosystem Assessment, which showed the strong economic arguments for safeguarding and enhancing the natural environment. The white paper also takes forward recommendations contained in Making Space for Nature, Professor Sir John Lawton’s independent review of England’s wildlife sites and ecological network.

The White Paper recognises that the natural environment is sometimes taken for granted and undervalued, but that people cannot flourish without the benefits and services it provides, asserting that:

“A healthy, properly functioning natural environment is the foundation of sustained economic growth, prospering communities and personal wellbeing”.

Within the White Paper there are two key initiatives aimed at resourcing and protecting the natural environment:

Local Nature Partnerships (LNPs) – provide the circumstances in which a range of organisations can work together for the benefit of the natural environment and to ensure it is taken into account in decision making.

Nature Improvement Areas (NIAs) – aimed at maximising landscape-scale opportunities that benefit the natural environment. NIAs cover very large areas.

The Localism Act 2011

The Act set out a series of measures aimed at transferring more powers from Central Government to local people. These include new freedoms and flexibilities for local government; new rights and powers for communities and individuals; reform to make the planning system more democratic and effective; and reform to ensure that decisions about housing are taken locally. The Act has at its heart the concept of the ‘Big Society’ within which local people feel empowered to help themselves, with less reliance on the state. This is important in the context of the current deficit and reductions in public money.

Healthy Lives, Healthy People (2011)

This White Paper sets out Central Government’s strategy for public health in England and outlines a commitment to protecting the population from serious health threats; helping people live longer, healthier lives. Within the White Paper, green space is highlighted as having a vital role in addressing public health issues.

Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006

The Act places a duty on local authorities to conserve biodiversity, seeking to make it a natural and integral part of policy and decision making. It has implications for a number of Council services but primarily links to the Council’s stewardship of its land.

The Council has signed the West Midlands Biodiversity Pledge and this contains a number of commitments that link directly to the biodiversity duty:

 Incorporating the conservation of biodiversity into site management plans and into decisions relating to the day-to-day management of sites in order to enhance biodiversity within the local authority estate. This includes working towards the designation of sites as LNRs  Working in partnership with Staffordshire Wildlife Trust in order to ensure particular ecological expertise is applied to the way sites are managed and to ensure that up-to-date biodiversity data is available to support the maintenance and development of local record centres. This assists in the delivery of the Staffordshire Biodiversity Action Plan  Working with other partners to enhance biodiversity across the wider public estate and to champion its importance. This also has significant potential for cost and resource efficiencies  Raise awareness of biodiversity issues with elected members, Council staff, contractors and the general public  Having input into the planning system and delivering the key principles for biodiversity set out in national planning guidance. This includes the use of S106 or CIL contributions, where possible to facilitate site improvements

Other guidance relevant to South Staffordshire

Blue Sky, Green Space: Understanding the Contribution Parks and Green Spaces can make to Improving People’s Lives (2011)

This report outlines the benefits of open space, in all its forms, regardless of whether sites are provided by statutory agencies, local authorities (including parish councils), or by community groups. It is suggested within the document that these benefits can cost- effectively promote health and wellbeing as well as increasing opportunities for community volunteering, actions and engagement.

Green Infrastructure Guidance (Natural England, 2009)

This sets out the contribution green infrastructure makes to spatial planning and sustainable development and explores the ways that it integrates with Central Government policies on economic growth and employment and healthy communities.

South Staffordshire Council is preparing a broad green infrastructure but it does receive significant consideration in this Open Space Strategy, which will act as a basis for further green infrastructure policy work.

Local Green Infrastructure: Helping communities make the most of their landscape (2011)

Produced by the Landscape Institute, this publication sets out how green infrastructure can be considered in such a way that it:

 Inspires people to make positive changes in their neighbourhoods by exploring the potential offered by the natural environment and integrating this into the way places are planned, designed and managed  Harnesses nature to promote sustainable economic development, attracts businesses to an area, adds value to property and opens up employment opportunities  Makes the most of our land by considering all of the elements that make up the landscape as service-providing infrastructure and its accompanying benefits

Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards (2010)

These standards, known as the ANGSt standards, formulated by Natural England, set out what are considered to be the amounts of natural greenspace that should be accessible to everyone based on certain distance thresholds. In the Standards, natural greenspace is defined as “places where human control and activities are not intensive so that a feeling of naturalness is allowed to predominate”. Natural and semi-natural greenspace exists as a distinct open space type but also as discrete areas within the majority of other types of greenspace. This is covered in more detail in Chapter 5.

Local policy context

South Staffordshire Core Strategy (Local Plan) Development Plan Document

The Core Strategy was adopted in December 2012 which, as part of South Staffordshire’s Local Plan, aims to shape a sustainable future for the district. It replaces the previous Local Plan adopted in 1996 and sets out the spatial planning strategy up to 2028.

This Open Space Strategy is being prepared in direct connection with Core Policy 14: Open Space, Sport and Recreation, but links very closely to a number of other Core Strategy policies.

As part of the Local Plan, a Site Allocations Document is being produced which will allocate land and identify specific sites for different types of development throughout the district. It will consider different land uses including housing, employment, open space, sport and recreation and will protect environmentally sensitive areas of land. It will also identify the sites needed to meet housing numbers set out in the Core Strategy and safeguard land for housing and employment use for 10 years post 2028.

South Staffordshire Council Plan 2012-2016

The overall aim of the Council Plan is to:

“Make the district a safer, healthier place to live, work and visit with prosperous villages, thriving communities and a high quality environment”.

In support of this, the Plan sets out a number of Priorities grouped across three themes – Your Place; Your Community; and Your Council. Open spaces directly contribute to a number of the priorities in all three themes.

South Staffordshire Sustainable Community Strategy 2008-2020

Prepared by the South Staffordshire Partnership (SSP), the Strategy sets out a long- term vision for the district based on the needs and aspirations of those who live and work in South Staffordshire. The SSP works across a number of themes, to which open spaces directly contribute:

 Children and young people  Community safety  Economic vibrancy  Environmental quality  Health and wellbeing  Housing

South Staffordshire Sports Facilities and Playing Pitch Strategy 2012-2028

This has been prepared based on a requirement to provide for the effective delivery of leisure services across the district and help to ensure that a strategic network of facilities are in place to cater for the needs of the current and expected future population. The strategy also provides the evidence base for relevant planning policies contained within the Core Strategy and the priorities for other investment. It addresses the broad range of facilities used by the community for sport and physical activity and sits alongside the Open Space Strategy as part of an Open Space, Sport and Recreation Supplementary Planning Document (SPD).

South Staffordshire Energy and Our Local Environment Framework 2012-2017

This document serves as a revision to the Council’s Climate Change Strategy that was first published in March 2008. It sets out a number of projects for South Staffordshire to build on the ongoing work to protect the local environment and ensure natural resources are both saved and used more efficiently. A number of actions have been identified in the document, which aim to protect the district’s endangered species, landscape and residents’ quality of life.

South Staffordshire Conservation Area Appraisals and Management Plans 2010

South Staffordshire has 11 new and revised village Conservation Areas, each with their own detailed Management Plans and Appraisals. These were designated in November 2010 and the changed boundaries and Management Plans associated with each came into immediate effect. These are in addition to the existing 8 Conservation Areas within the district.

The inclusion of Buffer Zones is also new. They are adjoining areas in which inappropriate development would have an adverse effect upon the character and integrity of the buildings and land within Conservation Areas. Almost all of the newly designated Conservation Areas have Buffer Zones. The Council will seek to ensure that development within Buffer Zones preserves or enhances the special interest of the Conservation Area and causes no harm to that special interest. Buffer Zones are also seen as being important in protecting accustomed views into and out from Conservation Areas by ensuring that they remain protected from inappropriate forms of development, and seeing that due regard is paid to accustomed views in the formulation of public realm works or enhancement schemes.

The Management Plan documents set out a mid- to long-term strategy in the form of a series of recommendations and guidelines for each Conservation Area. They have been informed by an accompanying character appraisal document for the Conservation Area, which identified its special character and concluded by outlining some of the issues that each faces.

Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) Management Plan 2014- 2019

The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 introduced a duty on local authorities with an AONB, or part of an AONB, within their administrative areas to work in partnership to produce a management plan for that AONB. The Council plays an active role on the formally constituted Cannock Chase AONB Partnership and contributes to the production

of the AONB Management Plan and its delivery ‘on the ground’ through a range of projects and initiatives.

Other South Staffordshire Council initiatives of relevance to open space

South Staffordshire Community Safety Partnership

The Council works closely with the Police in seeking to make South Staffordshire a safe place in which to live, work and visit. The Partnership recognises the impact that crime and anti-social behaviour can have on local communities. The overall aim of the Community Safety Partnership is therefore to reduce crime, the fear of crime and improve the quality of life for local people.

South Staffordshire Locality Commissioning Partnership (LCP)

The LCP works across a number of themes related to wellbeing:

 Dementia – the carer  Obesity  Mental wellbeing  Rural isolation

The obesity and mental wellbeing themes are of relevance in the production of the Open Space Strategy.

4. Current open space provision

This chapter sets out the current picture in relation to open space and, in particular, the approach used in the assessment of open space sites; the number of sites assessed and the results; and the different types of open spaces in South Staffordshire.

New sites and sites subject to improvement

A total of 16 new sites have come into being since the 2008 Open Space Audit was undertaken. Additionally, a number of sites have been subject to planned improvements since being assessed in the 2008 Audit.

Re-assessment of sites – approach and methodology

The mapping data from the previous Open Space Audit was utilised along with updated mapping information to take into account new sites. This provided the geographical basis for undertaking the current audit process. Sites have been assessed using criteria based on those used to assess Green Flag Award applications. The Green Flag Award is still the most appropriate and relevant measure of quality in relation to open space. Consequently, it retains its validity in the up-to-date assessment of sites.

Catchment area mapping has been used to assess current open space provision against the results of the consultation referred to below. The aim of this is to determine whether the locations of open spaces align with how far people believe they should travel.

All sites, including those that have come into being since the previous audit process, have been re-assessed in terms of quality and value, each site being given a score out of 100. It is important that open spaces fulfil their potential across a range of agendas such as health and wellbeing and biodiversity, among others. In order to ensure that open space management is set against a background of continuous improvement, the Council has taken the decision to make the criteria for assessing quality more challenging. This has resulted in some sites scoring below the 70% benchmark when previously they scored at or above 70%. This should not necessarily therefore be taken as a measure of deterioration. That is not to say that some sites are of lower quality and require investment to improve them.

A wide ranging open space-specific consultation has been used to inform the production of this strategy and, in addition to asking about their geographical location, questions were asked of consultees about the current state of open space and what people felt the priorities for improvement should be. This was supported by the provision of maps to assist people in completing the questionnaire. The consultation aimed to find out what people’s views are on the quality of open spaces, whether there are too many or too few and which types of open space are most used by local communities.

Members of the South Staffordshire Residents’ Panel were consulted about a broad number of issues and this included the use of open spaces in connection with health and wellbeing. This has also, therefore, provided some useful information that can be examined together with the results of the open space-specific consultation and the site

audit results to help formulate this Open Space Strategy. The results of the consultation undertaken with the public and parish councils can be found in Appendices 5 and 6.

Re-assessment results summary

As with the 2008 Audit, sites have been classified as a specific typology according to their primary function. A number of sites that scored below the 70% benchmark for quality and accessibility in the 2008 Audit are still in need of improvement.

Quantity

A total of 422 open spaces have been looked at as part of the audit used to support the development of this strategy. This covers around 2900 hectares of accessible open space and covers approximately 7% of the district. The following table provides a breakdown of the quantity of open space, separated into the different open space types across the wards within South Staffordshire. The figures in brackets (in the table below and all

other tables in this chapter) refer to the number of sites surveyed in 2008.

Number of sites

Civic

Spaces

Parks & Parks

Amenity

Children Gardens

Allotments

Greenspace

Churchyards

Cemeteries & Cemeteries

Young People & People Young

Green Corridors Green

Natural & Semi & Natural natural Greenspace natural

Ward Locality TOTAL Bilbrook 4 8 2(1) 0 2 1 0 1 0 14 Brewood & Coven 2 11 3 4 4 3(2) 1 2 1 29 Cheslyn Hay North & Saredon 3 7 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 13 Cheslyn Hay South 3 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 Codsall North 4 9 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 16 Codsall South 4 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 Essington 3 12 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 19 Featherstone & Shareshill 3 26 4 1 0 1 0 0 2 34 Great Wyrley & Landywood 3 19 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 22 Great Wyrley Town 3 14 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 20 Himley & Swindon 5 2 2 2 0 0 1 1(0) 1 9 Huntington & Hatherton 1 21(19) 2(1) 1 1 6(5) 1(0) 0 1 33 Kinver 5 3 1 3 4 4 2 1(0) 1 19 Pattingham & Patshull 4 1 4(3) 1 2 1 0 1(0) 1 11 Penkridge North East & Acton Trussell 1 2 2 4 0 0 1 0 1 10 Penkridge South East 1 8 2(1) 0 1 2 7 2 0 22 Penkridge West 1 4 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 11 Perton Dippons 4 8 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 12 Perton East 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Perton Lakeside 4 27 2 0 1 4 0 0 0 34 Trysull & Seisdon 5 2 2 3 4 2 0 0 2 15 Wheaton Aston, Bishopswood & Lapley 2 6 8(6) 7 3 0 1 0 2 27 Wombourne North & Lower Penn 5 8 1 2(1) 1 1 5 1 0 19 Wombourne South East 5 1 0 1(0) 1 0 2 0 1 6 Wombourne South West 5 4 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 7 TOTAL 220(218) 48(42) 38(36) 30 32(29) 28(27) 12(9) 14 422

Table 2 Re-audit - quantity results summary (the figures in brackets show the number of sites in existence at the time of the 2008 Open Space Audit)

Quality

The Green Flag Award criteria provide the widely recognised method for assessing open space quality. The Council has based its recent site assessment programme on the Green Flag criteria but with some adaptions aimed at making the criteria appropriate for assessing all open spaces. These adaptions cater for the fact that the majority of open spaces in the district fall within the ‘Amenity Greenspace’ type. Consequently, the use of the full range of Green Flag criteria is not appropriate in the assessment of such spaces as they are intended to test quality across factors that do not apply.

There are a number of tables within this chapter that provide information on quality across each open space type. The quantity data has been expressed at parish level in the tables in preference to the use of ward data as this is more meaningful in the district context and can be more easily linked to locality-based work.

Accessibility

South Staffordshire’s villages are fortunate in benefitting from open spaces well-spread throughout them. This is particularly the case for amenity open space and many of these sites also provide a function as Local Areas for Play (LAPs) thus contributing to the hierarchy of sites providing specific facilities for children and young people. From the previous audit of the district’s open spaces, accessibility was good in all but a small percentage of cases; and, as sites are located throughout the villages, they are easily accessible from where people live. The main consideration in terms of accessibility is therefore whether sites are accessible in terms of good quality entrances, their welcoming appearance and the ease with which people are able to move around the site.

The Council therefore takes the view that accessibility issues are part and parcel of the provision of high quality sites. Consequently, for the purposes of the site assessment process, accessibility considerations have been integrated in the assessment of quality and have not, therefore, been examined separately in the re-audit of sites as part of the preparation of this Open Space Strategy.

The Council recognises the guidance from Natural England – Nature Nearby, including the Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards (ANGSt) and supports the three main principles of improving access, increasing naturalness and improving connectivity. However, it has adopted its own method of determining the level of accessibility to natural open space rather than use the ANGSt model. This has involved using extensive consultation followed by catchment area mapping that examines the gaps in provision. It is felt that this approach is more suited to the rural context of South Staffordshire and the geographical separation of its settlements and a number of key natural open spaces. Notwithstanding this approach, in the majority of circumstances the ANGSt standards will actually be met through the Council’s approach. Additionally, the Council has always sought to manage its open spaces against a background of increasing biodiversity and ecological interest and will continue to do so, thus encouraging wildlife into the villages through the management and maintenance of general amenity open spaces.

Clearly, it is not possible to provide new sites that fall within certain typologies, for example, Historic Parks and Gardens and Churchyards. The opportunities to create new

green corridors are limited as are those to provide new civic spaces. Where opportunities arise, this is mainly likely to come forward as part of new residential development, although there may be potential opportunities arising from new applications for mineral sites and their associated restoration plans.

Value

In terms of ‘value’, it should be borne in mind that the assessment criteria do not necessarily apply to all types of open space. For instance, it would not be reasonable to expect that an area of general amenity open space had any significant heritage and/or educational benefits. Consequently, a lower score relating to value should not be taken as an indication that a particular open space is not providing the appropriate level of benefits set against community need. An example of the assessment criteria in included in Appendix 1.

Site assessment results

The list of sites, separated into their types, with their scores for quality and value can be found in Appendix 4.

Setting local provision standards

The 2008 Open Space Audit set out local standards for the provision of open space in terms of quantity, quality and accessibility. In preparing this updated Open Space Strategy, these have been carefully considered and carried forward, but refined based on the views of the local community but also set against the practicalities of providing certain types of open space. For example, it is not possible, due to their very nature, to provide new historic parks and gardens.

Additionally, the Council has looked to benchmark standards with those other comparable local authorities have set in relation to their open spaces and there are significant variations across the various types of open space. As mentioned in Chapter 3, South Staffordshire is set to see an increase in the population. In terms of the Council’s Core Strategy, there is a requirement to allocate sites to accommodate over 1000 new dwellings up to 2028. Open space provision must therefore align with increased demand and, consequently increased pressure on open spaces in order to ensure the communities’ needs are met. The Council has explored different ways of meeting future open space requirements and the approach to this is set out in Chapter 5.

The remaining sections within this chapter describe the different types of open space and their primary purpose. It should be noted that open spaces are often multi-functional providing for various uses by a wide range of user groups. However, it is necessary to refer to the primary purpose of each open space type as an aid to its classification and the assessment of its quality (incorporating accessibility) and value. The data gathered in relation to each type through the recently completed site audit process is set out along with a number of key observations that provide the narrative to interpret the numerical data.

Amenity greenspace

This type of open space includes informal recreation space and areas of incidental open space (land left over after development is completed which is subsequently landscaped). Amenity greenspace provides opportunities for sport and recreation as well as enhancing the appearance of residential or other areas.

Amenity greenspace, Perton

Where current provision falls below the recommended standard, it is important to bear in mind that the rural nature of South Staffordshire dictates that increasing provision of amenity greenspace will depend largely on bringing forward new development. This in turn will mean that where the under-provision relates to a particular ward in a particular village, it may not be possible to address under-provision within that specific ward. Consequently, the Council takes the view that whilst it is useful to assess provision at a ward level, any increases to the quantity of open space will be addressed settlement- wide. Table 3 below therefore includes figures for the combined wards in Cheslyn Hay, Codsall, Great Wyrley, Penkridge, Perton and Wombourne. Additionally, where it is not possible to increase provision in a particular ward, the focus will be on improving existing sites to ensure they meet the needs of residents living close to them.

The approach taken to assessing accessibility has been changed from that used in the previous Open Space Audit. Amenity greenspaces are well spread throughout the district’s villages, close to where people live so access, in terms of being able to travel (on foot) to sites, is not an issue. The accessibility of the site i.e. how easy or difficult it

is to get into and around the site has been assessed within both the quality and value criteria.

Quantity of provision

Combined Current provision settlement- Total area of Ward Number of sites (ha per 1000 wide sites (ha) population) provision (ha.) Bilbrook 8 7.41 1.817 Brewood & Coven 11 6.74 1.057 Cheslyn Hay North & Saredon 7 18.38 4.354 6.218 Cheslyn Hay South 10 7.49 1.864 Codsall North 9 7.32 1.814 1.938 Codsall South 1 0.49 0.124 Essington 12 22.62 4.682 Featherstone & Shareshill 26 8.70 1.544 Great Wyrley & Landywood 19 4.57 0.916 2.591 Great Wyrley Town 14 10.47 1.675 Himley & Swindon 2 0.72 0.359 Huntington & Hatherton 21 8.48(6.94) 1.650 Kinver 3 4.07 0.598 Pattingham & Patshull 1 2.29 1.025 Penkridge North East & Acton 2.873 2 0.29 0.082 Trussell Penkridge South East 8 9.84 2.196 Penkridge West 4 1.27 0.595 Perton Dippons 8 3.78 1.887 8.939 Perton East 6 13.96 5.867 Perton Lakeside 27 7.98 1.185 Trysull & Seisdon 2 0.69 0.334 Wheaton Aston, Bishops 6 2.90 0.731 Wood & Lapley Wombourne North & Lower 3.748 8 15.00 2.483 Penn Wombourne South East 1 0.10 0.026 Wombourne South West 4 5.87 1.239 Table 3 Current quantity of provision

Key observations

 There have been only 2 new sites created since the previous Audit was undertaken. These have come forward through a major residential development and this highlights the issue that the only practical way to increase open space within this typology will be through new development.

Current and future provision

Total Current Future Total area of Population Population provision provision number sites (2014) (2028) (ha per (ha per of sites (ha) 1000) 1000) South 170.94 220(219) 108600 112000 1.574 1.526 Staffordshire (169.4) Table 4

Note:

The future provision figure in this table is the quantity of amenity greenspace that will result from an increase in population without a corresponding increase in provision of this open space type.

Quality

Quality Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 86

Good 70-89 109

Average 50-69 25

Poor 30-49 0

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 5

Key observations  District-wide, the average quality score for amenity greenspace sites in South Staffordshire is ‘good’.  With the exception of new sites in Huntington, provision is largely unchanged from 2008.  A total of 25 sites scored below 70% for quality. Compared to the previous Audit results (where 26 sites scored below 70% and two were classed as poor) this represents an improvement over the past 6 years (although two of these are new sites). There are no sites currently classed as ‘poor’ or ‘very poor’.  38% of sites are classed as ‘very good’ and 50% of sites are classed as ‘good’. Together, these equate to 88% of sites. 12% of sites are classed as ‘average’.  The scores should be read in the context of the more challenging assessment criteria used this time around compared to that used in 2008.

Value

Value Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 21

High

Good 70-89 93

Average Med. 50-69 85

Poor 30-49 21

Low

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 6

Key observations  District-wide, the average value score for amenity greenspace sites in South Staffordshire is 69% which is only marginally below the benchmark.  52% of sites are classed as being at least good and within this, 10% are classed as ‘very good’. The value of these sites is therefore classed as ‘high’.  38% of sites were classed as being ‘average’ (having ‘medium’ value).  Disappointingly, 21 sites were scored within the ‘poor’ range (having ‘low’ value), equating to 10%. However, there are likely to be opportunities to improve these sites.

Young people and children

Under the typology, this type of open space includes areas such as equipped play areas, ball courts, skateboard and BMX areas, multi-use games areas (MUGAs) and teenage shelters, with the primary purpose of providing opportunities for play and social interaction involving both children and young people. In the context of this strategy, quipped play areas can be separated into types:

 Local equipped areas for play (LEAPs)  Neighbourhood Equipped areas for play (NEAPs)

Non-equipped areas can still provide less formal opportunities for play and are referred to as local areas for play (LAPs).

Heron Drive play area, Penkridge

Playing pitches and tennis courts are assessed separately in the Council’s Indoor and Outdoor Sports Facilities Study as are youth facilities such as MUGAs and skateparks.

The geographical spread of MUGAs and skate parks in South Staffordshire, together with their quality, accessibility and attractiveness is more important than quantitative rate of provision. Modelling a quantitative provision is not therefore particularly valuable or relevant in South Staffordshire where the population is relatively stable.

In relation to the provision of youth facilities, the planning standard set out in the Indoor and Outdoor Sports Facilities Study is therefore:

 MUGA, skatepark or other youth provision in each of the Main Service Villages  Design and quality standard to meet Sport England guidance for MUGAs  For skateparks and other youth facilities, take account of the views of local residents, particularly young people in relation to the details of the planned provision and reflect best practice

Notwithstanding the quantity standard, facilities in settlements that are not classed as Main Service Villages will be supported where a local need is identified and evidenced through consultation with local residents, particularly young people and promoted by the relevant parish council or other constituted community group.

Quantity of provision

population Provisi Combined Number Ward LAP LEAP NEAP Other aged 19 on settlement-wide of sites and under (ha.) provision (ha.) 1 Skate park & 1 MUGA (within Joey’s Bilbrook 2 (1) 1 Lane 971 0.20 Playing Field amenity greenspace ) Bishops Wood Brewood & Coven 4 1 2 Skatepark 1263 0.55 now dismantled Cheslyn Hay North 1 Teen 0.12 2 1 930 0.12 & Saredon shelter Cheslyn Hay South 0 865 0 Codsall North 1 1 787 0.15 0.15 Codsall South 0 853 0 Essington 1 1 1040 0.40 1 MUGA Featherstone & 4 2 1 Teen 1353 0.10 Shareshill shelter Great Wyrley & 0.58 2 2 1136 0.08 Landywood 1 Skate / Great Wyrley Town 4 3 1215 0.50 BMX park Himley & Swindon 3 2 1 288 0.21 Huntington & 1 Skate 2 (1) 1 1303 0.22 Hatherton park 1 Skate Kinver 2 (1) 1 1364 0.23 park 1 Skate park, 1 Pattingham & 5 (3) 2 teen 466 0.41 Patshull shelter & 1 MUGA Penkridge North 1.09 East & Acton 2 1 1 699 0.44 Trussell Penkridge South 2 (1) 1 1 1114 0.16 East 1 Skate Penkridge West 2 1 405 0.49 park Perton Dippons 0 408 0 0.28 Perton East 0 560 0 1 MUGA & Perton Lakeside 2 1 Teen 1453 0.28 Shelter Trysull & Seisdon 2 1 1 460 0.23 2 Skate Wheaton Aston, parks Bishopswood & 7 (6) 3 1 831 0.75 1 Teen Lapley shelter Wombourne North 0.23 1 1 1429 0.04 & Lower Penn Wombourne South 0 674 0 East Wombourne South 1 MUGA 3 (1) 1 1112 0.19 West Table 7 Current quantity of provision

Note:

The 2008 Open Space Audit calculated provision based on the overall district population figure. The Council has now taken the view that it is more appropriate to calculate provision based purely on the under 19 population in order to make for more representative and meaningful figures. This has then been worked out per 1000 population to provide the basis for setting a provision standard.

Current and future levels of provision

Total Population % of Population % of Current Future Total area of aged 19 & overall aged 19 & overall provision provision number sites under population under population (ha per (ha per of sites (ha) (2014) (2014) (2028) (2028) 1000) 1000) South 5.64 52 (42) 22100 20.3% 22000 19.6% 0.267 0.268 Staffordshire (4.60) Table 8

Key observations  The sites are distributed across the district with no set pattern or strategic planning determining their location. They have been created on an opportunistic basis, as and where available space and funding has allowed  The population figures for people under 19 years old represent 20.3% of the total district population (2014). The population projections predict this to change to 19.6% (2028). This represents a negligible decrease in under-19s of 100. Consequently, it will be important to reflect local demand when making provision for this open space type.  Current provision is 0.267 hectares when averaged out across the whole of the district’s under-19 population. However, provision (settlement-wide) in Cheslyn Hay/Saredon, Codsall and Wombourne is low

Quality

Quality Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 24

Good 70-89 24

Average 50-69 4

Poor 30-49 0

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 9 Key observations  The average quality score for children and young people’s provision across the district is 87%, which is ‘good’.

 All but 4 sites are classed as ‘good’ or ‘very good’ equating to just under 8% falling below the 70% benchmark.  The majority of sites within this type are owned and managed by parish councils but South Staffordshire Council undertakes maintenance operations on behalf of a number of parishes.  There have been a number of new facilities created and/or improved since the completion of the previous audit and these all scored above the benchmark.

Value

Value Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 16

High

Good 70-89 15

Average Med. 50-69 19

Poor 30-49 2

Low

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 10

Key observations  The average accessibility rating of provision for young people and children across the district is 74%, which is ‘good’ and above the benchmark.  59% of sites are at least ‘good’ (having ‘high’ value), with approximately half of these classed as ‘very good’.  36% of sites achieved ‘average’ scores but this still represents ‘medium’ value.  Two sites are classed as ‘poor’ (having ‘low’ value). These are MJH21 – Blymhill Playing Field; LJK317 – Brantley Crescent, Bobbington.  There have been a number of new facilities created and/or improved since the completion of the previous audit and these all scored above the benchmark.

Note:

The provision of MUGAs and skateparks has been examined in more detail as part of the Council’s work relating specifically to indoor and outdoor sports facilities.

Cemeteries and churchyards

Cemeteries and churchyards provide opportunities for quiet contemplation and burial of the dead, as well as opportunities for nature conservation and heritage based genealogical research.

Sytch Lane cemetery, Wombourne

Quantity of provision

Current provision Total area of Ward Number of sites (ha per 1000 sites (ha) population) Bilbrook 0 0 0 Brewood & Coven 4 1.93 0.294 (0.303) Cheslyn Hay North & Saredon 2 2.38 0.555 (0.565) Cheslyn Hay South 0 0 0 Codsall North 2 1.11 0.274 ().275) Codsall South 0 0 0 Essington 2 7.79 1.572 (1.613) Featherstone & Shareshill 1 0.64 0.111 (1.113) Great Wyrley & Landywood 0 0 0 Great Wyrley Town 1 0.45 0.073 (0.072) Himley & Swindon 2 0.62 0.305 (0.313) Huntington & Hatherton 1 1.02 0.199 (0.228) Kinver 3 3.39 0.469 (0.498) Pattingham & Patshull 1 0.73 0.325 (0.328) Penkridge North East & Acton 4 1.02 0.269 (0.285) Trussell Penkridge South East 0 0 0 Penkridge West 2 2.43 1.186 (1.135) Perton Dippons 0 0 0 Perton East 0 0 0 Perton Lakeside 0 0 0 Trysull & Seisdon 3 1.42 0.638 (0.684) Wheaton Aston, Bishops 7 1.71 0.414 (0.433) Wood & Lapley Wombourne North & Lower 1 0.86 0.131 (0.143) Penn Wombourne South East 1(0) 2.9 (0) 0.754 (0) Wombourne South West 0 0 0 Table 11 Current quantity of provision

Current and future levels of provision

Total Current Future Total area of Population Population provision provision number sites (2014) (2028) (ha per (ha per of sites (ha) 1000) 1000) South 30.41 39 (36) 108100 112000 0.281 0.272 Staffordshire (27.51) Table 12

Key observations  In terms of demand for their associated benefits, such as contemplation and nature conservation, there is not thought to be much need for increased provision.  Whilst table 12 shows a decrease in provision by 2028, a new cemetery has been opened by the Council in the north of the district. Consequently no additional provision of this typology will be required.

Quality

Quality Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 30

Good 70-89 9

Average 50-69 0

Poor 30-49 0

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 13

Key observations  Sytch Lane cemetery in Wombourne employs a high quality design and is maintained to a very high standard.  The site has a stunning, locally distinctive and unique gateway feature.  The site has a very tranquil feel and provides an excellent open space for walking and contemplation.  The Council’s newest cemetery in the north of the district, Strawberry Lane, has had regard to local landscape character in its design and includes very high quality bespoke gates and a shelter building.  Both of these sites have been designed to ensure that they are in-keeping with the character of the local landscape and are appropriate to their context in terms of their location on the edge of their respective villages.

Value

Value Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 4

High

Good 70-89 31

Average Med. 50-69 3

Poor 30-49 1

Low

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 14

Key observations  The majority of people using this open space type are within the older people demographic.  Both the Sytch Lane and Strawberry Lane cemeteries (the newest in the district) are located on the edge of their respective villages and only those living very locally (taking into account the use demographic) can benefit from associated uses without the need to travel by car. However, the primary function of these sites is as a cemetery and access is good and well signed from major nearby roads. The entrances are clear and welcoming.  There is a need, where possible within the constraints of the sites set against the value scoring criteria, to address, as a minimum, the site within the ‘poor’ (‘low’ value) category (MJH35a – All Saints Church Graveyard, Lapley). However, improvements should be sought to bring all sites up to at least the average standard, representing ‘medium’ value. 90% of sites currently have ‘high’ value.

Civic and heritage spaces

This typology includes civic and market squares and other hard surfaced areas designed for pedestrians. It also includes historic or heritage sites that have been classed as worthy of note and subsequent preservation for the benefit of future generations.

Chapel Square, Cheslyn Hay

Quantity of provision

Current provision Total area of Ward Number of sites (ha per 1000 sites (ha) population) Bilbrook 3 0.19 0.044 (0.043) Brewood & Coven 4 0.2 0.030 (0.032) Cheslyn Hay North & Saredon 1 0.07 0.016 (0.017) Cheslyn Hay South 0 0 0 Codsall North 2 0.11 0.027 (0.028) Codsall South 0 0 0 Essington 1 0.06 0.012 (0.012) Featherstone & Shareshill 0 0 0 Great Wyrley & Landywood 0 0 0 Great Wyrley Town 1 0.34 0.055 (0.054) Himley & Swindon 0 0 0 Huntington & Hatherton 1 0.28 0.054 (0.063) Kinver 4 4.71 0.652 (0.693) Pattingham & Patshull 2 0.11 0.049 (0.049) Penkridge North East & Acton 0 0 0 Trussell Penkridge South East 1 0.005 0.001 (0.001) Penkridge West 1 0.05 0.024 (0.022) Perton Dippons 0 0 0 Perton East 0 0 0 Perton Lakeside 1 0.004 0.001 (0.001) Trysull & Seisdon 4 0.6 0.267 (0.287) Wheaton Aston, Bishops 3 0.11 0.027 (0.028)

Wood & Lapley Wombourne North & Lower 2 0.02 0.003 (0.004) Penn Wombourne South East 1 0.15 0.039 (0.038) Wombourne South West 0 0 0 Table 15 Current quantity of provision

Current and future levels of provision

Total Current Future Total area of Population Population provision provision number sites (2014) (2028) (ha per (ha per of sites (ha) 1000) 1000) South 32 7 108100 112000 0.064 0.063 Staffordshire Table 15

Key observations  Since the 2008 Audit there has been no increase in the quantity of this typology  Many wards therefore continue to have no provision and a number of wards have only very minimal provision.  The population has increased in some wards since 2001 resulting in a minor net decrease in provision. Conversely, the populations of some wards have decreased slightly resulting in the opposite effect.  The population is expected to increase by 2028, compounding any decrease in provision and is also likely to result in those areas that receive the highest levels of new development experiencing a significant decrease in provision unless civic and heritage spaces are included in development proposals.  One new site (junction of Joey’s Lane/Bilbrook Road) has been created through the introduction of heritage signage. The site was previously a large grass verge only although it did form the old village green in historic Bilbrook. It was not assessed as part of the 2008 Audit for this reason.

Quality

Quality Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 22

Good 70-89 10

Average 50-69 0

Poor 30-49 0

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 16

Key observations  The overall standard of civic and heritage spaces remains high.  The 2008 Audit highlighted that only one site (Maypole, Windmill Bank, Wombourne) scored below the 70% benchmark. Whilst the site scored above the benchmark, to date, no improvements have been made to although these are programmed to take place.

Value

Value Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 5

High

Good 70-89 22

Average Med. 50-69 5

Poor 30-49 0

Low

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 17

Key observations  84% of sites scored above the benchmark; the majority being classed as ‘good’.  15% of sites achieved ‘average’ scores set against the value scoring criteria.  All sites have at least ‘medium’ value, with the majority classed as ‘high’.

Natural and semi-natural greenspace

Natural England defines accessible natural greenspace as “land, water and geological features which have been naturally colonised by plants and animals and which are accessible on foot to large numbers of residents”. This typology includes woodlands, scrub, grasslands, commons and nature reserves with the primary purpose of wildlife and biodiversity conservation, or that have unrestricted access to the general public.

Fig.11 Shoal Hill Common

Quantity of provision

Current provision Total area of Ward Number of sites (ha per 1000 sites (ha) population) Bilbrook 1 20.73 4.788 (5.085) Brewood & Coven 3 (2) 6.305 (0.2) 0.960 (0.685) Cheslyn Hay North & Saredon 0 0 0 Cheslyn Hay South 0 0 0 Codsall North 0 0 0 Codsall South 2 13.41 3.26 (3.392) Essington 1 2.11 0.426 (0.436) Featherstone & Shareshill 1 2.17 0.378 (0.386) Great Wyrley & Landywood 0 0 0 Great Wyrley Town 0 0 0 Himley & Swindon 1 56.62 27.85 Huntington & Hatherton 6 (5) 110.68 (107.37) 21.55 (24.01) Kinver 4 427.96 59.23 (62.89) Pattingham & Patshull 1 0.5 0.222 (0.226) Penkridge North East & Acton 0 0 0 Trussell Penkridge South East 2 1.88 0.417 (0.421) Penkridge West 1 0.94 0.459 (0.439) Perton Dippons 3 46.82 23.527 (23.389) Perton East 0 0 0 Perton Lakeside 4 11.16 1.739 (1.657) Trysull & Seisdon 2 141.66 63.667 (68.271)

Wheaton Aston, Bishops 0 0 0 Wood & Lapley Wombourne North & Lower 2 (1) 1.745 (0.02) 0.265 (0.124) Penn Wombourne South East 0 0 0 Wombourne South West 0 0 0 Table 18 Current quantity of provision

Current and future levels of provision

Total Current Future Total area of Population Population provision provision number sites (2014) (2028) (ha per (ha per of sites (ha) 1000) 1000) South 32 844.69 108100 112000 7.778 7.542 Staffordshire Table 19

Key observations  The district-wide level of provision is high at almost hectares per 1000 population.  Sites within this typology are relatively few in number but tend to cover large areas.  Many of the sites have high ecological value.  Many of these sites, because of their high profile and geographical locations are used by people from outside the district. This is particularly the case at Shoal Hill Common, Highgate Common and Kinver Edge.

Quality

Quality Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 5

Good 70-89 21

Average 50-69 5

Poor 30-49 1

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 20

Key observations  81% of sites are at least ‘good’.  Out of the three new sites, two score very highly (HBJ116 – Rear of Kingcup Drive, Huntington; HBJ151 – Barnfield Sandbeds, Brewood).  The site at Huntington has only very recently been taken over by the Council and requires further improvement to provide more defined paths and interpretative signage. Japanese knotweed also needs to be eliminated.  Improvements should be made to sites that scored within the ‘average’ category in order to bring them up the ‘good’ standard.  One site is within the ‘poor’ category (KAM048 – Lower Belt, A460 Cannock Road).

Value

Value Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 16

High

Good 70-89 11

Average Med. 50-69 3

Poor 30-49 2

Low

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 21

Key observations  85% of sites achieved ‘good’ or ‘very good’ scores.  Five sites scored below the 70% benchmark with two of these classed as ‘poor’ (and therefore having ‘low’ value). These are KAM127 – Field Access off Dippons Lane, Perton; KAM150 – The Church on the Common, Coven Heath).

Note:

Shoal Hill Common (shown in the photograph above) forms part of the Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and special scrutiny will be applied to projects on this site in order to ensure they respect the AONBs special characteristics. Decisions taken will accord with the requirements set out in the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 to have regard to conserving and enhancing the AONB. Management decisions will reflect the key issues in the AONB Management Plan 2014-2019 (and subsequent versions) and will be in accordance with the Plan’s policies.

Green corridors

These are generally linear features which contribute to a network of spaces that often connect to each other and typically include towpaths alongside canals and riverbanks, designated cycleways and disused railway lines. Green corridors are important for wildlife migration and biodiversity, as well as for recreational activities.

Wombrook Walk (Poolhouse section), Wombourne

Quantity of provision

Current provision Total area of Ward Number of sites (ha per 1000 sites (ha) population) Bilbrook 0 0 0 Brewood & Coven 1 0.1 0.015 Cheslyn Hay North & Saredon 0 0 0 Cheslyn Hay South 1 0.92 0.24 Codsall North 0 0 0 Codsall South 0 0 0 Essington 2 5.91 1.192 Featherstone & Shareshill 0 0 0 Great Wyrley & Landywood 1 6.27 1.275 Great Wyrley Town 0 0 0 Himley & Swindon 1 0.32 0.157 Huntington & Hatherton 1 (0) 1.757 (0) 0.342 Kinver 2 1.30 0.178 Pattingham & Patshull 0 0 0 Penkridge North East & Acton 1 0.27 0.071 Trussell Penkridge South East 7 3.26 0.724 Penkridge West 1 0.1 0.049 Perton Dippons 0 0 0 Perton East 0 0 0 Perton Lakeside 0 0 0 Trysull & Seisdon 0 0 0 Wheaton Aston, Bishops 1 0.3 0.073

Wood & Lapley Wombourne North & Lower 5 2.6 0.396 Penn Wombourne South East 2 6.39 1.661 Wombourne South West 2 3.59 0.757 Table 22 Current quantity of provision

Current and future levels of provision

Total Current Future Total area of Population Population provision provision number sites (2014) (2028) (ha per (ha per of sites (ha) 1000) 1000) South 28 (27) 33.09 108100 112000 0.305 0.295 Staffordshire Table 23

Key observations  The current level of (surveyed) provision of green corridors in the district is approximately 0.3 ha per 1000 population. The total level of green corridor provision (including those areas mapped but not surveyed) equated to approximately 0.71 linear kilometres per 1000 population.  Wombrook Walk (which has Green Flag status), South Staffordshire Railway Walk and Wyrley Essington Canal are located within their respective villages.  There is an opportunity to restore the Lichfield and Hatherton Canal towpath trail, through joint working with the trust. This will be reflected in an appropriate policy in the Council’s emerging Site Allocations Document.

Quality

Quality Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 10

Good 70-89 17

Average 50-69 1

Poor 30-49 0

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 24

Key observations  All of the sites assessed in the previous audit as falling below the 70% benchmark have been subject to a planned programme of environmental improvements. This is reflected in the scores shown in Table 24.  96% of sites are at least ‘good’.  The quality of sites within this typology is high across the district although one site is classed as ‘average’ (MJH74 – Wyrley and Essington Canal Walk South). It is important that this section of the site is improved as a priority as other sections of the walk are ‘good’.  Wombrook Walk, South Staffordshire Railway Walk and Wyrley Essington Canal are located within their respective villages and therefore have a good level of access.

Value

Value Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 3

High

Good 70-89 16

Average Med. 50-69 9

Poor 30-49 0

Low

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 25

Key observations  As with the improvements to the quality of these sites, accessibility has also been significantly improved.  68% of sites are at least ‘good’ and none are classified as having ‘low’ value.

Allotments

This type of open space includes all forms of allotments with a primary purpose of providing the opportunity for people to grow their own produce. Additionally, they also provide a source of recreation, a haven for wildlife, health benefits and contribute to the sustainability agenda.

Allotments off Poplars Farm Way, Coven

Quantity of provision

Current provision Total area of Ward Number of sites (ha per 1000 sites (ha) population) Bilbrook 1 1 0.231 Brewood & Coven 2 1.66 0.252 Cheslyn Hay North & Saredon 1 2.67 0.623 Cheslyn Hay South 0 0 0 Codsall North 2 2.95 0.728 Codsall South 0 0 0 Essington 0 0 0 Featherstone & Shareshill 0 0 0 Great Wyrley & Landywood 0 0 0 Great Wyrley Town 0 0 0 Himley & Swindon 1 (0) 0.545 (0) 0.268 (0) Huntington & Hatherton 0 0 0 Kinver 1 (0) 0.778 (0) 0.108 (0) Pattingham & Patshull 1 (0) 0.73 (0) 0.33 (0) Penkridge North East & Acton 0 0 0 Trussell Penkridge South East 2 1.47 0.326 Penkridge West 0 0 0 Perton Dippons 0 0 0 Perton East 0 0 0 Perton Lakeside 0 0 0 Trysull & Seisdon 0 0 0

Wheaton Aston, Bishops 0 0 0 Wood & Lapley Wombourne North & Lower 1 2.62 0.4 Penn Wombourne South East 0 0 0 Wombourne South West 0 0 0 Table 26 Current quantity of provision

Current and future levels of provision

Total Current Future Total area of Population Population provision provision number sites (2014) (2028) (ha per (ha per of sites (ha) 1000) 1000) South 12 14.37 108100 112000 0.133 0.128 Staffordshire Table 27

Key observations  Only 9 out of 25 wards have allotment provision.  Provision has increased in the southern part of the district with new sites being created at Kinver, Pattingham and Swindon. However, the northern wards still have the highest level of provision.  Delivery of new sites will need to be on an opportunity basis and this will be explored via the strategic planning process.

Quality

Quality Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 3

Good 70-89 8

Average 50-69 1

Poor 30-49 0

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 28

Key observations  The scores for the two new sites (PAW001 – St. Chad’s Allotment Site, Pattingham; HBJ330 – Greensforge Lane Allotments, Kinver) are very high.  One site is ‘average’ (MJH58 – Rear of Chambley Green Housing, Coven).

Value

Value Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 4

High

Good 70-89 6

Average Med. 50-69 2

Poor 30-49 0

Low

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 29

Key Observations  83% of sites are at least ‘good’, with 33% achieving ‘very good’ scores.  The two sites that achieved only ‘average’ scores are HBJ330 – Greensforge Lane Allotments, Kinver and MJH58 – Rear of Chambley Green Housing, Coven. However, this still represents a value classification of ‘medium’.

Historic parks and gardens

Background

South Staffordshire formerly comprised of two rural districts, Cannock Rural and Seisdon Rural. It was a rural hinterland to the industrial towns of the Black Country. During the Victorian era, city, town and borough councils and industrial philanthropists established formal parks and recreational areas as part of a series of welfare improvements to enhance the living conditions of the workers in the industrial towns and cities. There are no towns in South Staffordshire and as a result there are no formal parks.

Within the rural areas, people lived mainly in villages or cottages owned by the landowners on whose estate they worked. The landowners themselves lived in large halls or houses on their estates. Many had followed the 18th Century practice of laying out the agricultural land around the main house as extensive parkland with a formally designed ‘pleasure garden’ close to the house. The parklands were generally characterised by a rolling landform, containing individual parkland trees, a lake and water features, and contained by belts of woodland often enclosed by a brick or stone boundary walls. These parklands had a significant impact on the character of the landscape. There were often borrowed views from the park into the surrounding countryside.

Weston Hall gardens and parkland

Within South Staffordshire there are 13 historic parklands and gardens. These are at Chillington, Enville, Four Ashes, Hatherton, Hilton, Himley, Wombourne Wodehouse, Somerford, Stretton, Teddesley, Patshull, Wergs and Weston. The parklands at Chillington, Enville and Weston are of particularly high quality and have been identified as Grade II* in the National Register of Historic Parks and Gardens. Patshull and Himley have been identified as Grade II.

A number of these parks are open to the public; others are crossed by public rights of way or contain common land. Their contribution to the character and quality of the landscape and to the settings of the villages is outstanding and gives South Staffordshire its unique character. Furthermore, Hatherton Park and Teddesley Park contribute to the landscape quality of the AONB setting. Baggeridge Country Park has also been included within this section due to its heritage value and connection to Himley Hall parkland.

Sites within this typology tend to be large, covering many hectares of land. This makes assessment of provision at a locality level more relevant than ward level. For clarity both methods of assessment are included in the tables below.

Quantity of provision

Current provision (accessible to the Total area of Number of Total area of public to some Ward sites with public sites sites (ha) degree - ha per access(ha) 1000 population) Bilbrook 0 0 0 0 Brewood & Coven 2 493.75 412.75 62.79 Cheslyn Hay North & 0 0 0 0 Saredon Cheslyn Hay South 0 0 0 0 Codsall North 0 0 0 0 Codsall South 0 0 0 0 Essington 0 0 0 0 Featherstone & Shareshill 2 11.32 1.20 0.21 Great Wyrley & 0 0 0 0 Landywood Great Wyrley Town 0 0 0 0 Himley & Swindon 1 306.71 306.71 150.86 Huntington & Hatherton 1 45.50 0 0 Kinver 0 0 0 0 Pattingham & Patshull 1 137.70 137.70 61.30 Penkridge North East & 1 76.47 76.47 20.15 Acton Trussell Penkridge South East 0 0 0 0 Penkridge West 0 0 0 0 Perton Dippons 1 45.0 0 0 Perton East 0 0 0 0 Perton Lakeside 0 0 0 0 Trysull & Seisdon 2 222.81 222.81 100.14 Wheaton Aston, Bishops 2 433.36 363.42 88.06 Wood & Lapley Wombourne North & 0 0 0 0 Lower Penn Wombourne South East 1 7.30 7.30 1.90 Wombourne South West 0 0 0 0 Table 30 Current quantity of provision

Locality level provision

Total area of Number of Total area of Locality Population sites with public sites sites (ha) access (ha) 1 15,486 2 121.97 76.47 2 10,700 4 927.11 776.17 3 29,880 2 11.32 1.20 4 25,427 2 182.7 137.70 5 26,638 4 536.82 536.82 Table 31

Current and future levels of provision

Total no. of Total area Current Future Total sites with of sites Population Population provision provision number of public with public (2014) (2028) (ha per (ha per sites access access (ha) 1000) 1000) South 14 8 2577.44 108100 112000 23.84 23.01 Staffordshire Table 32

Key observations . The previous audit only counted those sites that have some level of public access. For completeness, this review has listed all historic parklands and gardens within South Staffordshire. . Baggeridge Country Park was included within this typology in the previous audit and has again been assessed within under this heading. However, it also provides a function within the Natural and Semi-Natural typology and has achieved Green Flag status.

Quality

Quality Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 8

Good 70-89 0

Average 50-69 0

Poor 30-49 0

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 33

Key observations  On some sites, ‘accessible’ is considered to be any form of public access and may be, for instance by public footpath and/or limited opening and/or events for which a charge is levied. Consequently, not all of the land is necessarily accessible but the character and features of the site may be experienced nonetheless.

Value

Value Score (%) Number of sites

Very Good 90-100 5

High

Good 70-89 3

Average Med. 50-69 0

Poor 30-49 0 Low

Very poor 0-29 0

Table 34

Key observations  Unsurprisingly, all sites are classed as at least ‘good’ meaning that their value is ‘high’.  62% of sites achieved scores in the ‘very good’ category.  These statistics reflect the nature of the sites within this open space type.

5. Delivering the vision

This chapter sets out how the vision for open space in South Staffordshire will be achieved and describes how open space contributes to local and national policies, the Council’s Priorities and the work of partner organisations.

Open space issues cut across a number of issues and agendas; these are explored in this chapter. There are myriad ways of setting about delivering the vision for open space but in order to completely reflect the strategic picture in South Staffordshire, it is appropriate to make the links to the wider vision of the South Staffordshire Partnership (SSP) set out in the Sustainable Community Strategy 2008-2020 along with the spatial objectives contained within the Council’s Core Strategy (the Local Plan). The Open Space Strategy forms background evidence in support of the Local Plan’s policies and will be used to prepare a comprehensive Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) covering open space, sport and recreation. This is particularly important as it will enable the Council to successfully implement the Open Space Strategy in terms of future protection, enhancement and new provision through decision making based on Local Plan policies. This will assist in addressing open space issues in a spatial planning context and provide a robust mechanism for securing developer contributions.

The Open Space Strategy will allow the Council to manage and maintain its own open spaces against a set of strategic aims and objectives and ensure new sites are appropriately designed and laid out as part of the development planning process. It will also provide the basis for working in partnership with other relevant organisations. In delivering the strategy, it will be essential that each site delivers the right balance between providing places for people whilst at the same time, allowing nature to flourish within the district’s villages.

As the Open Space Strategy is intended to serve both land-use planning and land management functions, this Chapter addresses these separately. However, it should be noted that there are common links between the two. These will be explored further in an action plan that will be finalised following consultation on this draft version of the document.

Ensuring the right quantity, quality and value – how standards will be used to deliver and manage open spaces

Council Plan links YOUR PLACE: Providing good quality affordable housing; Promoting places to visit, play and enjoy as a tourist destination. YOUR COMMUNITY: Supporting the ageing population to be healthy and independent; Improving people’s health and wellbeing; Creating a clean environment that is a great place to live for old and young alike. YOUR COUNCIL: Providing value for money and quality services.

Quantity

It is important to ensure that there are sufficient open spaces to meet both current and future need. In terms of the latter, this will be closely linked to new development and

the assessment of both current and future quantity aims to address any deficiencies in provision. In assessing the future quantity requirements for open space, the Council has used three ways of determining how much new provision will be needed across the various open space types and these approaches are set out in the tables below. It should be noted that there is no inclusion of the Parks and Gardens open space type (separate from Historic parks and gardens) as these do not feature in South Staffordshire. Indeed, the district is unusual in that there are no parks in the traditional sense and this reflects the rural nature of South Staffordshire. The Council seeks to maintain this character and therefore provides a range of open spaces (also in conjunction with parish councils and other organisations) that are more informal but nonetheless provide a range of facilities for local residents and visitors. Therefore, this approach to strategic open space provision will continue in order to maintain local distinctiveness.

Quantitative planning standards for future open space provision

Open space type Proposed standard and justification Amenity greenspace These can be found extensively within the villages and form the greatest number of open space types in South Staffordshire, providing general open space functions. Therefore, the priority is to ensure that this provision is carried forward in any new developments coming forward, making a standard per 1000 population appropriate.

The current level of provision of amenity open space is considered to be sufficient for a largely rural district such as South Staffordshire. Any new residential development in the district should include sufficient amenity open space to ensure that the existing level of provision is maintained. Consequentially, the existing standard of 1.574ha per 1000 population should be provided as part of new development

Green corridors It is important to enhance biodiversity of open spaces within the District and further develop an interconnected network of greenspaces which benefit all local residents. Consultation with local residents during the Open Space Audit also identifies Green Corridors as one of the most important types of open space within the District.

Therefore, new Green Corridors will be incorporated provided alongside new Amenity Greenspace provision, in line with the existing quantity of Green Corridor provision 0.305ha per 1000 population.

This may take the form of on-site provision or the creation of off-site green corridors where feasible. Where this is not possible, contributions to the enhancement of existing sites will be required. This standard also seeks to maximise opportunities to provide linkages between green corridors and other nearby open spaces.

Natural and semi-natural South Staffordshire already enjoys a high level of Natural greenspace and Semi-Natural provision. This is in part due to the large scale of many Natural and Semi-Natural sites within the District. Consultation with local residents during the Open Space Audit also identifies Natural and Semi-Natural Greenspaces as one of the most important types of open space within the District.

Therefore, due to the local importance of this open space type, existing Natural and Semi-Natural sites should be protected to the existing standard (7.778ha per 1000). Given the likely scale of new development within the District, new developments may not be of an appropriate scale to deliver appropriately large Natural and Semi-Natural sites in line with existing sites within South Staffordshire. Furthermore, the ANGst definitions are much broader than the typology assessed in this section and other open space typologies are therefore also considered to provide access to suitable local greenspace that meets the ANGSt recommendations. Therefore, new Natural and Semi-Natural functions will be delivered through appropriate design elements incorporated as part of new Greenspace provision.

Civic and heritage spaces Development which provides spaces that promote good design and enhances the character of new development is vital to maintaining the distinctive character of South Staffordshire’s villages. Therefore, the existing standard of Civic and Heritage spaces should be maintained and carried forward through the District.

Consequentially, new Civic Spaces will be delivered through new development, in line with the existing quantity standard of 0.064ha per 1000 population. This should be based on professional officer judgement and good urban design principles These can be created when opportunities arise and are likely to come forward through new development, either as part of that development or by changing the character of an existing site.

Young children’s Existing young children’s facilities have a less consistent provision spread across South Staffordshire’s villages in comparison to, for example, existing Amenity Greenspace provision. Consultation undertaken as part of the Open Space Audit, alongside officer judgement, identified an indicative 740m travel catchment of residents to facilities of this type. Therefore, new Young Children’s provision will be delivered at the rate of 0.192ha per 1000 population, with new facilities provided where development comes forward in an area outside of an existing Young Children’s facility’s 740m catchment.

There may also be a case for new provision where there is a demonstrated local need in that location, such as that demonstrated through consultation with the relevant Parish

Council and local community.

It is recognised by the Council that this is an aspirational standard which is above the existing level of provision per 1000 population for this type of open space, and seeks to provide sufficient facilities to encourage young families to stay within the District.

Older children and young Evidence base work undertaken in the Council’s Sports people’s provision Facilities and Playing Pitch Strategy identified a requirement for each Main Service Village to have a MUGA, skate park or other youth provision in each of the Main Service Villages in the District. Therefore, in order to ensure sufficient provision of this typology, a standard of 0.075ha per 1000 population will be used, with new facilities provided in Main Service Villages lacking such a facility.

There may also be scope for new provision in other locations where there is a demonstrated local need in that location, such as that demonstrated through consultation with the relevant Parish Council and local community.

Allotments Allotment provision is dictated by local demand – which can change. Therefore provision of this open space type will be led by intelligence gathered from enquiries to the District Council and/or parish councils and brought forward through new development where such a local need is demonstrated.

Open Spaces not suitable for quantitative planning standards

Open space type Justification Cemeteries and The Council has undertaken separate work to examine the churchyards need for burial space for the next 25-30 years. Therefore, creating a planning standard for this typology as part of this strategy would be inappropriate. In relation to churchyards, by their nature, they are unable to be provided in addition to those that already exist.

Historic parks and By their nature, these cannot be recreated and therefore gardens their locations are fixed. In addition, they do not receive the same type of use in that, as specific attractions, those with an interest will travel specifically to use them. Therefore, specifying planning standards for this typology is inappropriate.

Quality

A range of criteria has been used to assess quality. This is a more subjective exercise but nonetheless provides the information for assessing how sites measure up in terms of what they offer and the specific benefits they provide. The assessment of quality has been based on the Green Flag Award criteria. Green Flag is the nationally recognised standard for open space and the Council considers this to be the most appropriate way of assessing the quality of open spaces of all types. The assessment of quality applies to both current and future sites in terms of the standards that need to be met but provides an extremely useful tool in the justification for improvements to existing sites. Where sites have fallen below the quality benchmark, the Council will seek to ensure that this is addressed through a variety of measures including partnership working, supporting locally-led action and through securing developer contributions. The benchmark for assessing quality has been set high at 70%. This has been carried over from the previous Open Space Audit and Open Space Strategy and is considered to be the appropriate measure of quality for open spaces in South Staffordshire.

Value

The assessment of open spaces as part of this strategy has also included considerations relating to value. Sites have been assessed against a number of criteria and scored as either low, medium or high. Due to the nature of many sites, they do not necessarily score medium or high but this is not an indication of them being poor in any particular way. It simply means that they do not have the added value that other sites have. This Open Space Strategy adopts a new approach to assessing value. In recognition that many sites will not achieve high assessment scores, due mainly to the nature of the site, the Council considers that use of a lower benchmark of 60% is appropriate. This will, however, provide a basis for the value of sites to increase where opportunities can be identified and feasibly implemented for those sites that achieve scores below the benchmark.

Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards (ANGSt)

The ANGSt standards are a set of recommendations from Natural England based on three underlying principles:

1. Improving access to green spaces. 2. Improving naturalness of green spaces. 3. Improving connectivity with green spaces.

‘Natural’, within the recommendations does not necessarily mean that sites have to be valued for their rarity or noted for a particular ecological reason. The recommendations are:

Everyone, wherever they live should have an accessible natural greenspace:

. of at least 2 hectares in size no more than 300m (5 minutes walk) from home; . at least one accessible 20 hectare site within two kilometres of home; . one accessible 100 hectare site within five kilometres of home; and . one accessible 500 hectare site within ten kilometres of home; plus . a minimum of one hectare of statutory Local Nature Reserves per thousand population Natural England (2010)

It is the case in South Staffordshire that the majority of green spaces have, and will continue to be, managed against a background of providing a sense of naturalness to reflect the rural character of the district whilst aiming to ensure residents have access to attractive and useable community spaces. This includes Amenity greenspace; Green corridors; Natural and semi-natural sites; Cemeteries and churchyards.

Notwithstanding this, the district’s villages and hamlets are set within a strong rural context, which offers opportunities for experiencing the natural environment and rural tranquillity through the use of the Public Right of Way (PRoW) network. Many of these PRoWs are easily accessible from within settlements and open spaces, therefore providing good links out into the countryside. The Council considers that this, along with access to a number of major strategic natural green spaces, accords with the spirit of the ANGSt Standards even though it may not be possible to ensure provision is wholly in line with the recommendations. Fig.8 below, details the major open spaces within South Staffordshire and the links to, from and between them. Existing links will be enhanced where appropriate and new links will be created through a range of means including Council open space management decisions, developer contributions and partner action. Provision will be addressed at both a strategic level through enhancing existing major strategic sites and at the local level through the enhancement of existing amenity greenspaces and linkages and the creation of new sites as part of development schemes.

Fig.8 Major strategic open spaces and linkages

The South Staffordshire standards

The following tables set out the standards for quantity, quality (including accessibility) and value to be maintained and achieved in the lifespan of the strategy. It should be noted that the standards for quantity reflect the need to retain existing open space provision within the District.

Amenity greenspace

QUANTITY Existing level of provision Recommended standard 1.574 ha per 1000 population 1.574 ha per 1000 population Justification The current level of provision of amenity open space is considered to be sufficient for a largely rural district such as South Staffordshire. Any new residential development in the district should include sufficient amenity open space to ensure that the existing level of provision is maintained.

QUALITY Standard All sites should score at least 70%. They should be clean and well-maintained sites that are visually attractive and provide opportunities for a variety of leisure and recreational uses for an appropriate range of ages. They should also be safe and secure with appropriate provision of appropriate ancillary facilities. Sites should be accessible for all, providing safe and secure access routes, having clearly marked pathways and appropriate provision for disabled users along with appropriate signage. Where appropriate (as detailed by site specific Management Plans), all opportunities should be proactively taken to enhance biodiversity and ecological interest. Justification This standard reflects the Green Flag Award criteria for quality and ensures that the high quality of sites is maintained. It will also ensure that each site continues to be utilised and maintains its important community function, appealing to all age ranges. Enhancing biodiversity and ecological interest will assist the Council in complying with its duties under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006.

VALUE Standard All sites will achieve a value categorisation of at least ‘medium’ within 5 years with longer term improvements (over the life of the Open Space Strategy) to increase value of all sites to ‘high’. This applies primarily to the assessment of (but is not necessarily limited to): Level and Type of Use; Ecological/Biodiversity Benefits; Health and Wellbeing and Social Inclusion; Climate Change and; Amenity Benefits and a ‘Sense of Place’. New sites should aim to achieve ‘high’ value in their design and through their implementation. Justification This standard will enable sites to fulfil their value potential but recognises that value- based improvements will result mainly from longer-term action, often linked to the results of improvements aimed at increasing quality. The Standard recognises the context of this open space type.

Younger children’s provision

QUANTITY Existing level of provision Recommended standard 0.192ha per 1000 population 0.192ha per 1000 population Catchment area 740m for NEAP provision; 240m for LEAP provision; 60m for LAP (not necessarily equipped) provision. Fields in Trust recommended standard 6 acres (2.43ha) per 1,000 population for ‘playing space’ consisting of 2 acres (i.e. 0.81 ha per 1,000 population) for children’s playing space Justification This standard includes areas of equipped play space or play provision (with informal play space or incidental open space covered by the ‘Amenity’ typology). It is considered that Fields in Trust quantity standards, although currently met by existing provision, are particularly geared towards provision in urban areas, where other forms of incidental open space provision is minimal. As South Staffordshire is a rural district, catchment area provision is deemed suitable for equipped play space and is based on public consultation.

QUALITY Recommended standard All provision for young people and children should be sites of good quality or higher (scoring 70% or above), providing a well-maintained, enriched play environment which is safe, secure and accessible for all. The areas should be clean, well lit, and free of litter and dog fouling. They should also comply with appropriate national guidelines for design and safety. Provision for older children / teenagers should include areas of shelter (with seating). All provision for young people and children should have safe and secure access routes with appropriate provision for disabled users. Sites should be located so they are easily accessed from defined areas and the means is safe and convenient. Access should be possible without having to cross a major traffic route. Justification The standard reflects the need for the good design of play areas in which there is a clear division between areas designated for younger and older children. There is recognition of the need for sites to be in a safe and secure location with clear boundaries. It also recognises the need for spaces in which children can go to meet friends and not just use the equipment. The recommended standard ensures the safety of children and young people upon entry and exit from the site. The standard recognises the need for equal access for all. It is in line with recommendations for distance thresholds set out in the Local Plan/NPFA. If these standards are not met this is reflected in the scoring and these sites fall below the 70% acceptable standard for accessibility.

of all sites to ‘high’. This applies primarily to the assessment of (but is not necessarily limited to): Level and Type of Use; Health and Wellbeing and Social Inclusion and; Educational Benefits. New sites should achieve ‘high’ value in their design and implementation. Justification This standard will enable sites to fulfil their value potential but recognises that value- based improvements will result mainly from longer-term action, often linked to the results of improvements aimed at increasing quality. The Standard recognises the context of this open space type.

Provision for older children and young people

Refer to Sports Facilities and Playing Pitch Strategy 2013-2028. Proposals for MUGAs should be built in accordance with Sport England’s ‘Artificial Surfaces for Outdoor Sport’.

Cemeteries and churchyards

QUANTITY

Existing level of provision Recommended standard 0.281 ha per 1000 population No standard recommended Justification Because of the nature of this typology, it is not appropriate to recommend a quantity standard for the provision of cemeteries and churchyards.

QUALITY Recommended standard All sites should score at least 70%. They should be clean and well-maintained sites that are visually attractive. They should also be safe and secure with appropriate provision of appropriate ancillary facilities, including benches and litter bins where appropriate. They should also contain areas that promote biodiversity and nature conservation. The sites should provide safe and secure access routes, having clearly marked pathways and appropriate provision for disabled users. The means of access should be safe and convenient and should include appropriate signage. Justification This standard reflects the Green Flag Award criteria for quality and ensures that the high quality of sites is maintained. It will also assist in promoting the use of these sites as important areas of open space for walking/contemplation. This standard recognises the need for equal and safe access for all, when travelling both to and within the site.

implementation.

Justification This standard will enable sites to fulfil their value potential but recognises that value- based improvements will result mainly from longer-term action, often linked to the results of improvements aimed at increasing quality. The Standard recognises the context of this open space type.

Civic and heritage spaces

QUANTITY Existing level of provision Recommended standard 0.064 ha per 1000 population 0.064ha per 1000 population Justification Whilst it is not possible to create instant heritage, the creation of new civic spaces and the provision of features that may have future heritage interest is part of good urban design and should be an integral part of new development. The standard is considered to be the appropriate method of determining the level of provision.

QUALITY Recommended standard All sites should score at least 70%. They should be clean and well-maintained sites that are visually attractive. They should be safe and secure with appropriate lighting and provision of appropriate ancillary facilities, including benches and litter bins where appropriate. Sites where local facilities and points of interest exist should be clearly signed. Signage should provide interpretative information to educate visitors about the historical context of the site. Civic space should be accessible for all and have surfaces and entryways that are suitable for disabled users. Sites should be able to provide easily accessible meeting places for the local community. Heritage sites should be easily accessible will adequate provision for disabled users. They should also be well signposted where appropriate. Where appropriate, design of heritage spaces should be informed by ‘Streets for All: West Midlands’ and local heritage conservation advice. Justification This standard will promote a high quality of provision, ensuring that sites can continue to be enjoyed by both local residents and visitors. This standard recognises the need for equal and safe access for all, when travelling both to and within the site.

VALUE Recommended standard All sites will achieve a value categorisation of at least ‘medium’ within 5 years with longer term improvements (over the life of the Open Space Strategy) to increase value of all sites to ‘high’. This applies primarily to the assessment of (but is not necessarily limited to): Level and Type of Use; Health and Wellbeing and Social Inclusion; Educational Benefits and; Historic and Cultural Benefits. Justification This standard will enable sites to fulfil their value potential but recognises that value- based improvements will result mainly from longer-term action, often linked to the results of improvements aimed at increasing quality. The Standard recognises the context of this open space type.

Natural and semi-natural greenspace

QUANTITY Existing level of provision Recommended standard 7.778ha per 1000 population To maintain existing provision whilst delivering Natural and Semi-Natural elements through general Greenspace provision Justification Current provision of this typology is very high when viewed district-wide. The ANGst definitions are much broader than the typology assessed in this section and other open space typologies are therefore also considered to provide access to suitable local greenspace that meets the ANGSt recommendations. Consequently, this is considered an appropriate method on which to base provision.

QUALITY Recommended standard All sites should score at least 70%. They should provide a pleasant natural environment, free from litter and fly tipping. They should be utilised and maintained in such a way that biodiversity and existing wildlife habitats are enhanced and conserved. Interpretative information highlighting the natural and ecological significance of sites should be provided where appropriate. There should be a clear network of footpaths to ensure safe and controlled access while promoting informal recreation. Disabled access should be provided where possible, providing it does not interfere with the character of the site. Entrances should be clearly discernible and should identify that the site is publicly accessible. Justification This standard will help to maintain the overall quality of these sites, both in terms of maintaining their ecological importance and enhancing the visitor experience. Interpretative information will help to instil a sense of respect, understanding and reduce misuse. This standard will also ensure that the sites are accessible by all with clearly marked pathways ensuring public safety and optimising the visitor experience. Clear entrance signage/gateway features will help eliminate confusion regarding whether or not sites are publicly accessible.

VALUE Recommended standard All sites will achieve a value categorisation of at least ‘medium’ within 5 years with longer term improvements (over the life of the Open Space Strategy) to increase value of all sites to ‘high’. This applies primarily to the assessment of (but is not necessarily limited to): Level and Type of Use; Health and Wellbeing and Social Inclusion; Educational Benefits; Structural and Landscape Benefits and; Ecological/Biodiversity Benefits. Justification This standard will enable sites to fulfil their value potential but recognises that value- based improvements will result mainly from longer-term action, often linked to the results of improvements aimed at increasing quality. The Standard recognises the context of this open space type.

Green corridors

QUANTITY Existing level of provision Recommended standard 0.305ha per 1000 population (0.71 Linear km 0.305ha per 1000 population (based on per 1000 population) professional officer judgement) Justification Green corridors in the district are primarily located along canals, brooks, streams, disused railways or routes of historic significance. Provision is likely to increase only on a windfall basis and professional judgement will be applied to determine what level may be required in relation to new development. This may take the form of on-site provision or the creation of off-site green corridors where feasible. Where this is not possible, contributions to the enhancement of existing sites will be required. This standard also seeks to maximise opportunities to provide linkages between green corridors and other nearby open spaces.

QUALITY Recommended standard All sites should score at least 70%. They should provide a clean, litter-free, level and well-drained pathway, which ideally links other areas of open space. Green corridors should contain natural vegetation and provide benches and litter bins where appropriate. Footpaths should be wide enough to cater for wheelchair users and be free of obstructions such as very low overhanging branches or overgrown vegetation. They should be well signposted from all access points with appropriate methods of preventing access by vehicles, whilst allowing easy wheelchair access. This will ensure that sites are accessible by all. Effective signposting will encourage greater use and solutions to improve access routes will be actively pursued. Justification This standard provides a vision for any new provision and also a benchmark for existing sites in terms of enhancement. It ensures the routes provide a pleasant recreational experience, encouraging usage as part of sustainability and healthy lifestyles.

VALUE Recommended standard All sites will achieve a value categorisation of at least ‘medium’ within 5 years with longer term improvements (over the life of the Open Space Strategy) to increase value of all sites to ‘high’. This applies primarily to the assessment of (but is not necessarily limited to): Level and Type of Use; Health and Wellbeing and Social Inclusion; Educational Benefits; Structural and Landscape Benefits and; Ecological/Biodiversity Benefits. New sites should achieve ‘high’ value in their design and implementation. Justification This standard will enable sites to fulfil their value potential but recognises that value- based improvements will result mainly from longer-term action, often linked to the results of improvements aimed at increasing quality. The Standard recognises the context of this open space type.

Allotments

QUANTITY Existing level of provision Recommended standard 0.13 ha per 1000 population Identified demand Justification Allotment provision is demand-led and provision needs to be flexible to accommodate peaks and troughs in this demand. Consequently, it is not appropriate to apply a definitive recommended standard. The recommendations of the National Society of Allotment and Leisure Gardeners should be utilised where feasible but provision will require regular review to ensure provision is matched as closely as possible to demand. It is more appropriate to base provision on the Localities data rather than at a ward level. This is because demand at ward level is likely to vary greatly and there will not be sufficient flexibility in land-use change to accommodate it. Through identifying demand via individuals/community groups/parish councils, this standard will provide for maximising opportunities to deliver additional sites through new development.

QUALITY Recommended standard All sites should score at least 70%. They should be clean and well maintained sites that encourage biodiversity and promote education and health benefits. Soils should be of good quality and pathways should be clearly marked with well-defined boundaries. Sites should be safe and secure with appropriate provision of ancillary facilities (e.g. litter/composting bins). All sites should score at least 70%. Sites should be spacious, providing safe and secure access routes and including provision for disabled users. Sites should be located so they are accessible form areas of demand. The means of access should be safe and convenient, minimising the reliance on private transport where feasible. Justification This standard reflects the Green Flag Award criteria for quality and will ensure that new and existing allotments are maintained to a high standard. It will also provide a basis for promoting associated sustainability and health benefits. This standard will also ensure that sites are accessible by all and should maximise the use of existing sites.

VALUE Recommended standard All sites will achieve a value categorisation of at least ‘medium’ within 5 years with longer term improvements (over the life of the Open Space Strategy) to increase value of all sites to ‘high’. This applies primarily to the assessment of (but is not necessarily limited to): Level and Type of Use; Health and Wellbeing and Social Inclusion; Economic Benefits and; Educational Benefits. New sites should achieve ‘high’ value in their design and implementation. Justification This standard will enable sites to fulfil their value potential but recognises that value- based improvements will result mainly from longer-term action, often linked to the results of improvements aimed at increasing quality. The Standard recognises the context of this open space type.

Historic parks and gardens

QUANTITY Existing level of provision Recommended standard 23.84 ha per 1000 population No standard recommended Justification In the context of the audit, Parks and Gardens are taken to refer specifically to historic parks and gardens. It is not, therefore possible to apply a standard due to the historical development of these sites.

QUALITY Recommended standard All sites should score at least 70%. They should be clean and well-maintained sites that are visually attractive and provide opportunities for leisure and relaxation. Care should be given to conserving the features and settings of historic landscapes. The sites should provide safe and secure access routes, having clearly marked pathways and appropriate provision for disabled users. Biodiversity interests within these spaces should also be maintained and enhanced, particularly where veteran trees are present. Justification This standard reflects the Green Flag Award criteria for quality and ensures that the high quality of sites is maintained. It will also ensure that the sites continue to attract visitors and provide benefits in terms of tourism and preserving the historic landscaped environment. This standard recognises the need for equal and safe access for all, when travelling both to and within the site.

VALUE Recommended standard All sites will maintain their current value. This applies primarily to the assessment of (but is not necessarily limited to): Level and Type of Use; Economic Benefits; Educational Benefits; Historic and Cultural Benefits and; Structural and Landscape Benefits. Justification This standard will enable sites to continue to fulfil their value benefits and recognises the context of this open space type.

Effective strategic planning for open space

Council Plan links YOUR PLACE: Providing good quality affordable housing. YOUR COUNCIL: Being an ambitious council and excellent community leader.

This section should be read in conjunction with the sections – ‘Open Space within the Development Management Process’ and ‘Green Infrastructure’. The combination of an increased population and the planned housing growth in South Staffordshire means that the facilities available to communities need to be sufficient to be able to accommodate this into the future. In terms of open space provision, this means examining the current level of provision and determining whether it is sufficient to cope with the projected increased demand (i.e whether there is already more than is currently needed); whether there are gaps in provision of certain types of open space (this has been examined

through the use of catchment area mapping and these maps form a series of documents separate to this strategy); and what level of shortfall exists for other open space types such as amenity greenspace.

With a few exceptions, as Table 2 on page 31 shows, it is the latter that forms the majority of open space provision within the villages and it is this type that provides local communities with areas of greenspace close to where they live. It is therefore important to ensure that every village has access to sufficient areas of good quality greenspace that is managed strategically (more on this below), well designed and maintained (more on this below, also) and that the appropriate amount and type of open space is included as an integral part of new development. A key priority will be to increase the naturalness of open spaces with a focus on addressing provision gaps and on enhancing amenity greenspaces either through new landscape treatments and or changes to maintenance regimes. Sites that have scored below the 70% quality benchmark will also be given priority for improvement. Further, and in terms of new development, where natural and semi-natural greenspace is not to be provided due to the size of the development and/or catchment thresholds, it will be expected that amenity open space provided on-site, will incorporate natural and semi-natural landscape elements. Due to their very nature, certain types of open space cannot be provided through the planning system such as historic parks and gardens. Neither will it be possible to create new open spaces with a character akin to that forming a site such as Shoal Hill Common due it being a naturally occurring area of lowland heath. All the other types of open space referred to in this strategy can be provided through the planning system, linked to the site allocations process.

It is clear from the results of the Open Space Audit that new open spaces are only likely to come forward in association with new development. The Council will therefore be looking to ensure that development proposals include provision of open space in accordance with the quantity standards set out in this strategy, including maximising opportunities to create links to, and improve accessibility to, existing open spaces.

For the purposes of complying with the requirements set out in the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations (CIL Regulations), the standards need to be expressed as a figure per dwelling in order to provide a more user-friendly method of applying the standard when formulating proposals for new development.

Open space within the development management process

Council Plan links YOUR PLACE: Providing good quality affordable housing; Protecting the Green Belt. YOUR COMMUNITY: Strengthening our rural communities; Supporting the ageing population to be healthy and independent; Improving people’s health and wellbeing; Creating a clean environment that is a great place to live for old and young alike.

The development of new residential areas will result in the provision of new open spaces and contribute to the improvement of existing sites.

The provision of open space within new development is an essential part of place making and good urban design. It helps create high quality environments with a focus on people

and where they live – and want to live. It supports wildlife, sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) and provides space for informal recreation for all ages. Well-designed multi- functional open spaces and sustainable community principles should therefore be at the heart of new developments. Such spaces should fully integrate with the built elements to create a cohesive scheme. The Council will expect developers to recognise the importance of this in achieving their goals and in assisting in the delivery of environmental and social objectives.

The Council will require development layouts to be landscape–led i.e. the landscape structure must inform the layout of the site. This should include an open space hierarchy of smaller to larger open spaces and should follow best practice urban design principles including water sensitive urban design. Landscape design should be incorporated into initial site planning decisions and detailed proposals should form part of a planning submission to be agreed before permission is granted. This will avoid situations where landscape is considered only after the layout has been designed with tokenistic landscape treatments on areas left over following construction of the built elements. Development proposals must respect, retain and enhance existing landscape features and incorporate them into the scheme. This includes individual or groups of trees, woodlands, hedgerows and ponds.

The character and setting of the villages is often supported by open space. This is particularly the case where open spaces provide the edge to a settlement. It will be essential to ensure that the character of these sites, and therefore the setting of the village, is not compromised by inappropriate development that fails to respect its surroundings.

Developer contributions through CIL and Section 106 Agreements will be required to provide for the improvement of existing sites where appropriate and/or the ongoing maintenance of new sites through commuted sums that cover a maintenance period of 15 years. The rate of the commuted sum for open space will be reviewed and updated, based on the prevailing Grounds Maintenance Term Contract rates.

Developer guidance on open space standards to be delivered through new development

The Council recognises that a simplified standard which amalgamates the various standards listed above would provide greater clarity for developers and Development Management officers, to ensure that the costs of open space provision and maintenance contributions can be easily factored into development costs from an early stage. Therefore, the Council has simplified the recommended open space standards of this strategy to provide a new amalgamated standard for open space provision, which has been included in the Site Allocations Document – Publication Plan consultation. This focuses on providing a single, easy to use standard for open space that is based upon the number of dwellings (rather than per 1000 population) provided by new development.

The Draft Open Space Strategy contained four separate typologies of open space which would need to be provided through new residential development, arising directly from the recommendations of the Draft Open Space Strategy. These are as follows:

- 1.879ha per 1000 bedspaces for greenspace provision - 0.64ha per 1000 bedspaces for civic space provision - 0.192ha per 1000 bedspaces for equipped play space provision - 0.075ha per 1000 bedspaces for MUGA/skate park provision

Taken together, the above requirements lead to a total requirement of 2.21ha of open space per 1000 bedspaces provided.

To understand, on average, how many bedspaces are created per new dwelling in South Staffordshire, historic housing completions from 2006 to present (i.e. the plan period so far) have been considered alongside assumptions regarding the number of bedspaces generated by dwellings of specific bedroom sizes. The number of bedspaces created by new development has been considered in order to understand how much of a need for open space each dwelling creates. This is partially because it reflects the approach of the Draft Open Space Strategy and also because the bedspaces created by a new development equates to the maximum number of new occupiers likely to use open space, therefore creating a need in planning terms to provide open spaces.

To understand how a need in terms of bedspaces translates to a need per dwelling, 3 different scenarios have been created using different assumptions regarding the relationship of bedspaces to dwelling bedroom numbers. These originate from: the assumptions contained in the Council’s Space About Dwellings standards (p.219 of the Core Strategy), page 5 of the National Internal Space Standards and the assumptions contained on page 79-80 of the consultation Draft Open Space Strategy 2014.

These assumptions and historic housing monitoring information from 2006 onwards indicate that, based upon average past trends since 2006, each new dwelling in South Staffordshire will create between 4.5 and 4.8 bedspaces.

As highlighted previously, the evidence base underpinning the Open Space Strategy indicates a need for 2.21ha open space per 1000 bedspaces created. Therefore, it follows that there is a need for approximately 0.01ha open space per dwelling.

With regards to maintenance fees, £65,190 per ha of open space details how much it would cost the Council’s Grounds Maintenance team to maintain a typical hectare of greenspace for a 15 year period, as required by the draft Open Space Strategy. The above maintenance fee has been calculated using the Council’s current Grounds Maintenance contract rates and an understanding of the elements commonly featured in open spaces provided in housing developments. A singular maintenance fee has been used to provide clarity for developers and Development Management officers. The maintenance fee has been based upon a typical hectare of greenspace provision as this typology will form the majority of open space provision in line with the current standards (representing roughly 85% of a typical ha of open space).

To determine whether it is appropriate to provide open spaces on or off site, a threshold has been created reflecting the typical minimum appropriate open space size from the Draft Open Space Strategy. 25 dwellings represents the size of site typically required to provide a greenspace of 0.25ha, in line with the standards detailed above (i.e. 0.01ha per dwelling). This is consistent with the minimum standard indicated on p.78 in the

Draft Open Space Strategy, which was informed by the judgement and experience of the Council’s Senior Landscape Officer at the time.

No minimum site size threshold for equipped play spaces or skate parks/MUGAs was explicitly stated in the Draft Open Space Strategy. However, given that the draft strategy stated that equipped play spaces should be required on developments of 208 or more bedspaces in line with a standard of 0.192ha per 1000 bedspaces, this implies a minimum site size of 0.04ha for equipped play spaces. Considered alongside a minimum greenspace size of 0.25ha this implies that 29 dwellings represents the size of site typically required to deliver a satisfactorily large greenspace and play area (i.e. 0.29ha of open space).

On sites of less than 25 dwellings, an off-site contribution should still be required (as there is a need in planning terms for new open spaces due to the increase in bedspaces). The Draft Open Space Strategy requires £93,698 per 1000 bedspaces to deliver offsite greenspace provision, with an additional fee for 15 years maintenance of £122,493 per 1000 bedspaces. Using the assumptions detailed above regarding the average number of bedspaces per typical completed dwelling in South Staffordshire, this requires a commuted sum of £993 per dwelling. Therefore, a commuted sum of £993 per dwelling should be required on sites of less than 25 dwellings.

Based upon the above workings, the table below identifies the standards the Council will use as a starting point in negotiating the open space contributions required by new development. Relevant costs have been identified through use of SPON’s External Works and Landscape Price Book 2014 alongside costs and grounds maintenance contracts from previous open space projects.

If an applicant can demonstrate an alternative robust method of delivering open space in a development, these will be considered by the Council. Equally, scheme viability will be a key concern in determining the scale of contributions required from development. As such the need for contributions will be balanced against the need to provide competitive returns to willing landowners and willing developers to ensure contributions do not impact upon scheme deliverability.

In addition to the below standards, there may also be a need for developments to provide commuted sums or other contributions as part of the program of Cannock Chase SAC Strategic Access Management & Monitoring Measures and Cannock Chase AONB Visitor Management Strategy. Please contact the Council for further information.

Open Space Standards for use in planning applications

Open Space provision on new development sites must be greater than 0.2ha in size, and based on the following requirements.

The following standards indicate the contribution to open space provision that will typically be expected of new housing developments to ensure they are acceptable in planning terms. These standards are the starting point for considering open space needs, but ultimately on-site open space provision should be responsive to the individual context of a site and the need to enhance connections with existing green infrastructure outside of a site boundary.

If an applicant can demonstrate an alternative robust method of ensuring open space needs are met in a development, these will be considered by the Council. Equally, scheme viability will be a key concern in determining the scale of contributions required from development. As such the need for contributions will be balanced against the need to provide competitive returns to willing landowners and willing developers to ensure contributions do not impact upon scheme deliverability.

Standard to be provided by new development

Where open spaces are to be provided on site, 0.01ha per dwelling should be provided to meet the community open space needs of the new development.

Open spaces which function as community greenspaces should typically be provided on-site on schemes of 25 dwellings or more, to ensure a minimum greenspace size of 0.25ha is provided.

Open spaces which function primarily as greenspaces but include equipped play areas or MUGA/Skatepark provision should be provided on-site on schemes of 29 dwellings or more. This threshold will ensure a minimum greenspace size of 0.25ha is provided, alongside an equipped play space or skatepark/MUGA of at least 0.04ha.

Maintenance fee: To allow the Council to adopt and maintain any open spaces provided through new development, a maintenance fee to allow for the ongoing maintenance of open spaces will be required from any development contributing to open space provision. This will equate to a commuted sum of £65,190 per ha of open space provided. These rates will be reviewed as and when the Council’s Grounds Maintenance Contract Rates are revised.

Off-site contributions: An off-site contribution equivalent to 0.01ha of community open space per dwelling to be provided onsite on schemes of 10-24 dwellings. Typically, this will take the form of a contribution to cover both provision and maintenance of offsite greenspace provision, or the improvement an existing nearby open space. As such, the Council will require the payment of £993 per dwelling on schemes of 10-24 dwellings.

Other green infrastructure requirements

The above standards reflect the amount of open space needed to serve the additional need for multi-functional open space arising from new development. However, there will in many cases be a need to provide additional green infrastructure above these standards in order to meet other adopted policy requirements. For example, many developments on the edge of villages will require additional substantial landscape buffers to mitigate landscape and visual effects under Core Strategy Policy EQ4 and EQ12. Furthermore, many developments may require additional green infrastructure to provide satisfactory sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) to meet the requirements of Core Strategy Policy EQ7. Therefore, the standards described above should not be viewed as an upper limit on the amount of green infrastructure required to serve a development.

Allotments

The need for allotments within a village will be led by locally identified demand and are not included in the above standards. On site provision or contributions to improve existing facilities will be sought if a local need for such facilities has been identified. Consultation with the relevant Parish Council and local community will be the starting point for identifying such needs.

Designing open space provision

The provision of open space within new development is an essential part of place making and good urban design. It helps create high quality environments with a focus on people and where they live – and want to live. It supports wildlife, sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) and provides space for informal recreation for all ages. Well-designed multi-functional open spaces and sustainable community principles should therefore be at the heart of new developments. Such spaces should fully integrate with the built elements to create a cohesive scheme. The Council will expect developers to recognise the importance of this in achieving their goals and in assisting in the delivery of environmental and social objectives.

Landscape design should be incorporated into initial site planning and detailed proposals should form part of a planning submission to be agreed before permission is granted. This will avoid situations where landscape is considered only after the layout has been designed with tokenistic landscape treatments on areas left over following construction of the built elements. Development proposals must respect, retain and enhance existing landscape features and incorporate them into the scheme. This includes individual or groups of trees, woodlands, hedgerows and ponds.

The character and setting of the villages is often supported by open space. This is particularly the case where open spaces provide the edge to a settlement. It will be essential to ensure that the character of these open spaces, and therefore the setting of the village, is not compromised by inappropriate development that fails to respect its surroundings.

Elements to be considered in scheme design

In line with the Council’s Open Space Strategy, it will be important to ensure the design of any open space provision enhances biodiversity and reflects the area’s rural nature, through incorporating appropriate design elements and linking to existing natural corridors wherever possible. Schemes should primarily draw on the elements indicated below and should be designed to include green corridor and semi-natural functions within greenspaces wherever possible.

Suggested elements to be considered in general greenspace provision: Amenity grass, rough grass, meadow grass, informal shrub belts, informal tree belts, trees in grass, hedgerows, informal footpaths, post and rail fencing, open water

Suggested elements to be considered where open space is provided within village centres: Amenity grass, tegula cobble paving, meadow grass, formal shrub beds, trees in grass, trees in paving, timber benches.

Open space quality and value in new development

Provision required by the above standards should be delivered to the Quality and Value standards outlined in the section marked ‘The South Staffordshire Standards’ above. Key factors in achieving these standards will be reflecting best practice in site design and early engagement with the Council’s Senior Landscape Officer.

Green infrastructure

Council Plan links YOUR PLACE: Providing good quality affordable housing; Protecting the Green Belt. YOUR COMMUNITY: Strengthening our rural communities; Supporting the ageing population to be healthy and independent; Improving people’s health and wellbeing. YOUR COUCNIL: Working with parish councils and other partners to plan and deliver services across our five localities

Green Infrastructure (GI) is the network of green spaces, rivers and lakes that intersperse and connect villages, towns and cities. In rural areas this can include fields, woodlands, hedgerows, country parks, rivers and lakes. In urban areas it can include domestic gardens, street trees, sports pitches, civic spaces, green roofs and walls.

‘GI assets range from country parks, lakes and woodlands to urban interventions such as green roofs and street trees. They can be specific sites at the local level or broader environmental features at the landscape scale within and between rural and urban areas such as wetlands, moors and mountain ranges.’

‘GI functions are the roles that assets can play if planned, designed and managed in a way that is sensitive to, and includes provision for, natural features and ecosystem services. They may have obvious primary functions, but each asset can perform different functions simultaneously – a concept known as multifunctionality. For example, street trees add aesthetic quality to an urban area, but will also reduce airborne pollution, provide shade, reduce urban heat island effects, mitigate wind chill and turbulence and increase biodiversity.’ Landscape Institute (2011)

GI is about connecting people with nature and is part of creating pleasant, attractive places. It provides the basis for integrated spatial planning that covers a range of issues such as housing, water management, food growing, mitigating the impacts of climate change, heritage and biodiversity.

Careful planning of new development will provide opportunities for adding to local green infrastructure and this will be brought forward through both the strategic and development management processes. Outside of this, through the stewardship of its own open spaces, the Council will examine all opportunities for increasing their multifunctionality in order to increase the benefits to local communities and wildlife that these sites are able to provide. For example, this may involve ‘retro-fitting’ measures such as the creation of new wet areas to aid flood storage capacity – particularly near to main water courses and through increasing tree cover aimed at strengthening the overall landscape structure within the villages.

Open space management and maintenance

Council Plan links YOUR PLACE: Promoting places to visit, play and enjoy as a tourist destination. YOUR COMMUNITY: Supporting the ageing population to be healthy and independent; Improving people’s health and wellbeing; Creating a clean environment that is a great place to live for old and young alike. YOUR COUNCIL: Providing value for money and quality services. Being an ambitious council and excellent community leader; Working with parish councils and other partners to plan and deliver services across our five localities.

Management and maintenance are different but closely related functions of looking after open spaces of all types. In simple terms, ‘management’ should be seen as providing strategic guidance and responding to necessary changes, whilst ‘maintenance’ is operational, implementing management decisions on the ground. Open space maintenance regimes should flow seamlessly from management decisions which should, where appropriate, be backed up by comprehensive management plans.

‘If parks and green spaces are well managed, research has shown that communities use their local spaces more, have better relationships with their local councils and take some pride in the area where they live.’ GreenSpace (2011)

Open spaces in South Staffordshire are managed by a number of organisations. The Council’s sites are managed by Grounds Maintenance and Bereavement Services within the Environmental Services Directorate. Through its term contractor, the Council also maintains land owned by South Staffordshire Housing Association, a number of Parish Councils along with a number of school grounds sites. These are all maintained according to a common specification and this ensures – and will continue to ensure – that sites are maintained in a consistent manner regardless of ownership.

There are a wide range of factors that require consideration in the management and maintenance. These are explored in other sections of this chapter but the two key ones are the use of open spaces by people and wildlife. South Staffordshire is a rural district and the Council will seek to continue its management of sites set against this background. This means that sites will reflect rural character as far as possible even within the more built-up areas whilst aiming to ensure residents have access to attractive and usable community spaces. Managing sites for biodiversity is therefore a significant consideration in order to bring more wildlife into the villages, particularly the larger, more built-up areas. The Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006 (NERC) places a duty on the Council to conserve biodiversity and aims to raise its profile, seeking to make it a natural and integral part of policy and decision making. Notwithstanding that it actually has implications for a number of Council services; it primarily links to the Council’s stewardship of its land through the grounds maintenance function.

‘The ways in which open spaces are managed and maintained can make a significant difference to how local communities respond to them.’ Landscape Institute (2011)

This can be positively or negatively depending upon how a particular space is perceived. It may be the case that, as part of the site assessment process, sites scored highly but this does not necessarily mean that they are meeting community needs or fulfilling their potential. Where it is established that sites are not highly regarded by local communities, residents and users, the Council will seek to understand why. Where necessary, the Council will then seek to change perceptions by making positive changes to the site in consultation with those who use them. This may include accessibility, changes to management and maintenance or radical solutions but is part of the Council’s commitment to being a customer focussed organisation. Ongoing consultation with local people will be an important area of work to establish community perceptions relating to open spaces and sufficient resources will need to be put in place to address any issues that may arise from this process.

As already stated, the Council looks after a large number of sites within its ownership but also maintains land on behalf of South Staffordshire Housing Association, a number of parish councils and schools. Outside of this, some parish councils have taken on responsibility for managing and maintaining open spaces themselves. In order to ensure

a consistent management and maintenance approach is taken by all who own and/look after open spaces, it will be important for the Council to work closely with all of these organisations to address any identified issues and to consult local communities. This will help to ensure open spaces fulfil their potential and meet the needs of people. The Council has signed the West Midlands Biodiversity Pledge and this contains a number of commitments that link directly to the biodiversity duty and it is therefore important that the Council, through the grounds maintenance service, does a number of things. These are broadly:

 Incorporating the conservation of biodiversity into site management plans and into decisions relating to the day-to-day management of sites in order to enhance biodiversity within the local authority estate. This includes working towards the designation of sites as Local Nature Reserves (LNRs).  Working in partnership with Staffordshire Wildlife Trust in order to ensure particular ecological expertise is applied to the way sites are managed and to ensure that up-to-date biodiversity data is available to support the maintenance and development of local record centres. This assists in the delivery of the Staffordshire Biodiversity Action Plan.  Working with other partners such as SSHA, parish councils, the County Council, Forest of Mercia and friends groups to enhance biodiversity across the wider public estate and to champion its importance. This also has significant potential for cost and resource efficiencies.  Raise awareness of biodiversity issues with elected members, Council staff, contractors and the general public.  Having input into the planning system and delivering the key principles for biodiversity set out in national planning guidance. This includes the use of S106 or CIL contributions, where possible to facilitate site improvements.

One of the simplest ways in which the Council can have an impact on biodiversity is through direct management of its own land, so a major part of meeting the biodiversity duty is reviewing and making changes to the way sites are managed and maintained. Individual site specific Management Plans will consider how the biodiversity duty will be delivered together with meeting local residents’ aspirations for the site. The application of the Act should therefore provide guidance for site operations through the Council’s grounds maintenance contract, as this implements the site management plans. This is likely to involve improvements such as new tree and shrub planting using native species and species of high wildlife value, the establishment of wildflower areas, hedge laying and woodland coppicing. It should also include changes to maintenance regimes where appropriate such as conversion of amenity grass to create swathes of rough grass, and bulb planting. In considering the potential for new tree and woodland planting, it should also be noted that use of naturally colonising woodland can be cheaper to maintain than grassland typologies, and that after the establishment phase, managed woodland in open spaces cost less to maintain than amenity grassland.

To summarise, the NERC Act has a direct impact on the way the Council manages and maintains its and others’ land and therefore lies at the heart of service delivery. The higher quality the open spaces, the more people will want to use them and this has a positive effect on reducing anti-social behaviour. Incidentally, it also has implications beyond just grounds maintenance such as energy use, procurement and waste

management, so provides the basis for joined up thinking across a number of the Council’s functions and those of its partners.

Green infrastructure considerations will also play a key role in the Council’s management and maintenance of its land along with providing a basis for influencing its partners to pursue measures aimed at improving the multifunctionality of their sites.

Health and wellbeing

Council Plan links YOUR COMMUNITY: Supporting the ageing population to be healthy and independent; Improving people’s health and wellbeing; Creating a clean environment that is a great place to live for old and young alike. YOUR COUNCIL: Providing value for money and quality services; Being an ambitious council and excellent community leader; Working with parish councils and other partners to plan and deliver services across our five localities.

There is a wealth of research relating to the contribution open spaces make to physical and mental health and the wellbeing of communities. This research is now reflected in national policy through, for example, The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature (2011) and Healthy Lives, Healthy People (2011). Open space, sport and recreation policies sit within the Health and Wellbeing chapter within the Council’s Local Plan (Core Strategy).

In addition, there is a strong body of evidence to suggest that the landscape has a significant role to play in reducing resource requirements on the National Health Service through providing opportunities to prevent ill health before it occurs. This includes tackling obesity, heart disease, diabetes and mental illness. The creation of open spaces has long been recognised as an important factor in addressing health issues. Victorian parks created within urban areas and the tree-lined streets and open spaces at Bournville and Port Sunlight are prime examples of the recognition of the link between high quality places and good health.

The more often a person visits urban open green spaces, the less often he or she will report stress-related illnesses. Grahn and Stigsdotter (2003)

The Landscape Institute Position Statement Public Health and Landscape – creating healthy places, identifies five principles that are considered essential to the creation of healthy places:

1. Healthy places improve air, water and soil quality, incorporating measures that help, where possible, in climate change mitigation.

2. Healthy places help overcome health inequalities and can promote healthy lifestyles.

3. Healthy places make people feel comfortable and at ease, increasing social interaction and reducing anti-social behaviour, isolation and stress.

4. Healthy places optimise opportunities for working, learning and development.

5. Healthy places are restorative, uplifting and healing for both physical and mental health conditions.

Landscape Institute (2013)

The provision of a network of open spaces of all types is central to creating healthy places and evidence demonstrates that the positive effects that access to good quality landscapes and open spaces has our health and wellbeing. The Sustainable Community Strategy and the Council Plan reflect the importance of healthy places.

The Open Space Strategy is a key document in determining how the Council plans for new open space and manages and maintains existing sites. Within this is the recognition of the district’s ageing population and the important role open spaces can play in helping to provide a range of opportunities for older people to stay fit and healthy.

As part of planning for this, the Council will identify where in the district there are health inequalities including those affecting older people but also those covering other ages including instances of childhood obesity. Through this strategy and other (Council and partner) strategies and areas of work, these issues will be tackled through the provision of new open spaces and the enhancement and promotion of existing sites. This may take the form of the provision of new opportunities for physical exercise but it is also important to recognise the role peace and tranquillity has on mental wellbeing through places that enable people to achieve a sense of calm contentedness. Open spaces also have a role to play as part of dementia-friendly communities, linking to the Council’s work around ‘The Good Life’.

Water management

Council Plan links YOUR PLACE: Providing good quality affordable housing. YOUR COMMUNITY: Making our district safe. YOUR COUNCIL: Providing value for money and quality services; Working with parish councils and other partners to plan and deliver services across our five localities.

For the purposes of this part of the strategy, ‘water management’ includes all measures that may be employed to control flooding, storm water run-off and the provision of new drainage systems.

Open spaces, as part of the district’s green infrastructure, are an essential tool in tackling flooding within urban areas. More green space equals more availability of areas to ‘soak up’ water, alleviating problems within urban areas. In conjunction with the provision of SuDS – see below, this can have a very significant effect in managing storm water and freshwater flooding.

Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) have been referred to above and their provision clearly forms part of the provision of open spaces within new developments. They can often add very significant value to open spaces as part of the creation of attractive

landscape features. Research has found that SuDS are a cost-effective method of delivering drainage that meets the requirements of current environmental legislation. The provision of SuDS normally includes detaining water above ground close to where it fell instead of forcing its discharge into conventional underground sewerage systems. It has been demonstrated that the capital costs of traditional drainage are more than double those of providing SuDS. Further, annual maintenance costs are 20–25% lower for SuDS and they are around half the cost over a 60 year life span (Duffy, Jefferies et al. 2008).

The provision of SuDS as part of new development will be strongly encouraged by the Council to meet the requirements of the Floods and Water Management Act 2010. Applicants will also have to meet the requirements of the Lead Local Flood Authority (Staffordshire County Council). Notwithstanding this, the provision of SuDS is a requirement of Policy EQ7 of the Core Strategy. Additionally, The Council will look for opportunities to undertake retro-fitting of SuDS on its open spaces and will encourage its partners to do the same. This includes the creation of new ponds and seasonally wet areas. The Council has included SuDS as part of the development of its cemetery in the north of the district.

Trees provide a range of benefits tied to the provision of SuDS, one of which is the slowing down of storm water run-off. Large mature trees are able to hold huge amounts of water in their canopies, releasing it slowly back into the ground. This helps to reduce problems associated with flash flooding. Consequently, the Council will exploit opportunities to increase tree cover wherever possible on its open spaces and will seek to work closely with parish councils and South Staffordshire Housing Association as the other major landowners in the district with a view to increasing tree cover on their land. The Open Space Strategy includes, as an appendix, a Tree and Woodland Strategy and the wider benefits of trees and woodlands are explored in more depth in that document. In addition to the above, maintaining open space buffers adjacent to rivers and waterbodies not only provides for habitat and amenity use, but can also provide flood risk benefits. Therefore, in meeting the relevant planning policy requirements regarding Flood Risk, opportunities to leave riverside land undeveloped, or creating new riverside space, should be a consideration in new development schemes.

Open space and the economy

Council Plan links YOUR PLACE: Promoting inward investment and sustaining local business and employment. YOUR COMMUNITY: Strengthening our rural communities. YOUR COUNCIL: Being an ambitious council and excellent community leader.

Boosting the economy now plays a huge part in what the Council does. This section of the strategy covers a range of topics, which are all linked in some way to economic growth. All open space forms part of the district’s green infrastructure and there has been much research to try and quantify the contribution this makes to the economy. Fig.9, below identifies a ‘Logic Chain’ (Eftec and Sheffield Hallam University, 2013) that sets out the interconnectivity between investing in green infrastructure and the factors that assist in contributing to economic vibrancy.

Over the life of this strategy, the Council will work to ensure open spaces within the district receive investment, mainly from developer contributions, but other opportunities for investment will be sought. This may be through partners and external funding linked to the Logic Chain principles.

Additionally, the Council will work with key partners to deliver opportunities for work experience and for people to gain new, environmental-based skills with a recognised qualification. Environmental charities will play a major role in this work and the Forest of Mercia Community Forest will be a key organisation, using its links with Community Forest Trust to access relevant funding streams.

The Stoke and Staffordshire Local Enterprise Partnership (SSLEP) may also play a key role and it is important to engage the SSLEP in order to ensure the links between high quality environments and the local economy are fully exploited within a wider package of measures aimed at boosting the economy. The Local Nature Partnership (LNP) also could have a key role especially in developing landscape-scale initiatives such as the potential South Staffordshire Living Landscape Partnership.

Fig.9 Investment in Green Infrastructure Logic Chain (Eftec and Sheffield Hallam University, 2013)

Priorities and performance monitoring

It is clear from the site assessment process that open spaces in South Staffordshire are of high quality. Out of 422 sites assessed, only 22 achieved scores that fell into the ‘average’ category (5%) and only one site was classed as ‘poor’ Therefore, 95% of sites are either good or very good in terms of quality. It should be remembered that sites were scored against a very high benchmark of 70%. However, the Council will not be complacent. There are opportunities to increase both quality and value of sites further and over time changes to patterns of use will also need to be addressed. The Council understands the importance of investing in its open spaces and realises that lack of investment ultimately leads to deterioration. This then takes significantly more resources to put things right over and above what would have been required as part of good, ongoing management and maintenance practice. Consequently it will be important to continue to provide the resources necessary to avoid a deterioration scenario. Active management plays an important role and the Council will prepare management plans for its major open spaces. These will incorporate measures to address areas of deficiency and to increase ecological and biodiversity interest.

In terms of quality, all sites scoring below the 70% benchmark will form the focus for improvement regardless of ownership and management responsibility. Improvements will be brought about through a number of means including, through developer contributions, and grounds maintenance operations based on management plans for larger sites and ‘programmes for improvement’ for smaller sites where full management plans would not be appropriate. The Council will work with a range of partners to improve sites and through initiatives such as District Deal.

Any sites categorised as having ‘low’ value will be improved as a priority. Some of this work may overlap with improvements to improve site quality. However, whilst ‘value’ is important, it is considered less so than quality as it is the latter that has the greatest impact on use and how open spaces are perceived by users. The Council therefore takes a more relaxed view on improvements to increase value and consequently, sites categorised as having ‘medium’ value are still considered to represent a reasonable value level. However, as part of good practice and against a programme of continuous improvement, opportunities to increase the value of ‘medium’ value sites will be proactively pursued. Over the life of the Open Space Strategy, this will result in all sites achieving a ‘high’ value score. Any sites categorised as having ‘low’ value will form the focus for action through the same mechanisms as for improvements to quality. Additionally, The Council will pursue the achievement of Green Flag status on an increased number of sites as a mark of seeking continuous improvement.

In order to ensure the Open Space Strategy remains current and responsive to contextual, policy and priority changes, it will be reviewed every five years. This will include the re-assessment of sites. Additionally, the action plan will be reviewed on a bi- annual basis.

6. Action plan

As referred to in Chapter 1, the Open Space Strategy has both planning and management functions and this is reflected in the following action plan. Some actions cut across both functions. The themes are aligned to those in the Local Plan Core Strategy as this provides the strategic policy basis for decisions covering both planning and management actions.

THEME: ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Objective 1 – Enhance the wildlife and ecological value of open spaces Action Planning Management Related policy/plan / Timescale Responsibility function function action plan objective 1. 1. Increase natural and semi-natural Local Plan Core Strategy; landscape elements on existing sites Council Plan.

(through retro-fitting) and on new sites as   part of development.

2. Continue Council support for locally-led Local Plan Core Strategy; environmental improvement schemes in Council Plan.   the villages as part of the District Deal initiative, using developer contributions, external funding.

2. 3. Prepare management plans for all Local Plan Core Strategy; major open spaces and manage them as Council Plan.

local nature reserves. 

3. 4. Increase the number of designated Local Plan Core Strategy; Local Nature Reserves based on the Council Plan.

locality structure. 

3. 5. Increase the number of sites that Local Plan Core Strategy; achieve Green Flag Awards. Council Plan; Individual site

 management plans.

6. Where appropriate, support new Local Plan Core Strategy;

woodland creation for the multiple   Council Plan. benefits it can provide for community place making

Objective 2 – Promote and celebrate local distinctiveness 2. 1. The provision of new sites and Local Plan Core Strategy; improvements to existing sites should Council Plan.

incorporate bespoke elements that reflect   local character and history.

3. 2. Promote local distinctiveness through Local Plan Core Strategy; individual site management plans. Council Plan; Individual site

 management plans.

4. 3. Establish an Open Spaces Working Council Plan. Group to encourage the coordination of

actions across the Council’s Community   Services and Planning functions.

5. As a priority, address any identified Local Plan Core Strategy; quality and value deficiencies on Council- Council Plan; Individual site

owned sites.  management plans.

6. 4. As a priority, work with parish councils Local Plan Core Strategy; and South Staffordshire Housing Council Plan; Individual site

Association to address any identified  management plans. quality and value deficiencies on their sites.

5. Where appropriate, support the creation Local Plan Core Strategy;

and management of woodland for its   Council Plan. contribution to improving people’s mental and physical wellbeing.

Objective 3 – Demonstrate leadership in promoting sustainability 6. 1. Undertake a study to identify the Local Plan Core Strategy; potential for retro-fitting Sustainable Council Plan; Individual site

Drainage Systems (SuDS) on existing  management plans. open spaces.

THEME: HOUSING

Objective 1 – Use the planning system to deliver new open spaces and enhance existing sites Action Planning Management Related policy/plan / Timescale Responsibility function function action plan objective 1. 1. Ensure the standards for open space Local Plan Core Strategy. are reflected in development proposals that receive planning approval. 

2. 2. Ensure development proposals are Local Plan Core Strategy. landscape-led and accord with a green

infrastructure approach. 

3. 3. Ensure developer contributions are Local Plan Core Strategy; used for maximum benefit for both new Council Plan.

and existing open spaces through   effective site management plans.

4. 4. Communicate the open space Local Plan Core Strategy. standards to planning agents via the

Agents Forum. 

5. 5. Communicate the priorities set out in Local Plan Core Strategy. the Tree and Woodland Strategy to planning agents via the Agents Forum. 

Objective 2 – Promote the sustainability of open space and green infrastructure through the planning system 5. 1. Through the development management Local Plan Core Strategy. process, ensure open spaces make an appropriate contribution to water  management through the integration of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).

THEME: ECONOMIC VIBRANCY

Objective 1 – Attract inward investment through the creation and maintenance of a high quality natural environment Action Planning Management Related policy/plan / Timescale Responsibility function function action plan objective

1. 1. Ensure major employment Local Plan Core Strategy. development schemes are informed by a landscape masterplan and accord with a  green infrastructure approach.

2. 2. Undertake a feasibility study to assess Local Plan Core Strategy; the potential to create a South Partners’ plans.

Staffordshire Living Landscape  Partnership.

Objective 2 – Promote the use of strategic recreational routes to provide connectivity between settlements 3. 1. Work in partnership with the Canal and Local Plan Core Strategy; River Trust to promote the tourism Council Plan; Tourism

potential offered by the canal network   Strategies. and any links to other appropriate strategic open spaces.

3. 2. Continue to work on cross-boundary Local Plan Core Strategy. issues in relation to the restoration of the

Hatherton Branch Canal. 

3. 3. Working in partnership with Local Plan Core Strategy; Staffordshire County Council, prepare Council Plan; Tourism

route maps and promotional literature for   Strategies; Partners’ plans. long distance linear routes such as The Forest of Mercia Way, The Staffordshire Way and the Wulfrun Way.

3. 4. Ensure that appropriate waymarking Tourism Strategies; Partners’ signage is in place for strategic walking plans.

routes.  

3. 5. Support Forest of Mercia to work on Local Plan Core Strategy; projects that aim to increase skills and Council Plan; Partners’ plans.

employment opportunities including the  Hilton site.

3. 6. Produce a comprehensive, publicly Local Plan Core Strategy. accessible GIS map of open spaces at the

locality level that includes the location  and type.

THEME: COMMUNITY SAFETY

Objective 1 – Address anti-social behaviour and damage to sites, encourage respect and proper use Action Planning Management Related policy/plan / Timescale Responsibility function function action plan objective 1. 1. Ensure open spaces are welcoming, Local Plan Core Strategy; clean and well maintained in order to Council Plan.

increase the number of users. 

5. 6. Through the development management Local Plan Core Strategy; process, design out crime in the creation Council Plan.

of new open spaces as part of  development.

Objective 2 – Encourage local communities to increase their involvement in the management of open spaces 2. 1. Ensure spaces fulfil their potential for Local Plan Core Strategy; social interaction and are multifunctional Council Plan.

through redesign of existing sites and in   the creation of new sites.

3. 2. Work in partnership with Keep Britain Local Plan Core Strategy; Tidy to deliver initiatives that increase Council Plan.

peoples’ use of open spaces through  direct community action.

3. 3. Volunteering - work with existing Local Plan Core Strategy; friends’ groups and identify potential new Council Plan.

friends groups to assist in the day-to-day  maintenance of sites.

3. 4. Encourage and assist community Local Plan Core Strategy; groups in the application of Green Flag Council Plan. Awards for appropriate sites. 

THEME: HEALTH AND WELLBEING

Objective 1 – Action Planning Management Related policy/plan / Timescale Responsibility function function action plan objective 1. 1. Explore opportunities to make open Local Plan Core Strategy; space/Good Life links Council Plan. 

2. 2. Work in partnership with the Canal and Local Plan Core Strategy; River Trust to improve towpath access, Council Plan.

promote walking routes and links to other   major open spaces, utilising developer contributions and external funding.

3. 3. Produce a set of locality level walking Local Plan Core Strategy; maps and make these available in leaflet Council Plan.

form and electronically.  

3. 4. Work with Clinical commissioning Local Plan Core Strategy; groups to promote the Hilton site as a Council Plan; Health

facility for addressing low-level physical  Strategies. and mental health issues.

3. 5. Manage an appropriate number of sites Local Plan Core Strategy; in each locality to promote peace and Council Plan.

tranquillity. 

THEME: YOUNG PEOPLE AND CHILDREN

Objective 1 – Increasing and improving play facilities Action Planning Management Related policy/plan / Timescale Responsibility function function action plan objective 1. 1. As a priority, target areas of under Local Plan Core Strategy; provision for both 0-14s and 14-19s. Council Plan.  

2. 2. New provision for 0-14s should accord Local Plan Core Strategy; with the concept of natural play. Council Plan.

 

3. 3. Provision for 14-19s should accord with Local Plan Core Strategy; the standards set out in the Council’s Council Plan; Sports

Sports Facilities and Playing Pitch  Facilities and Playing Pitch Strategy 2013-2028. Strategy.

Objective 2 – Connecting children and young people to natural and historic environments 1. 1. Provide a safe and secure facility for an Local Plan Core Strategy; ‘outdoor’ experience and for learning Council Plan.

about the natural environment.  

2. 2. Increase opportunities on open spaces Local Plan Core Strategy; across the district for learning linked to Council Plan.

the National Curriculum across all key   stages.

3. 3. Develop projects that connect children Local Plan Core Strategy; and young people to the historic Council Plan.

environment based around historic parks  and gardens.

4. 4. Work with partner organisations to Local Plan Core Strategy; deliver Nature Play activities. Council Plan. 

Objective 3 – Ensure there are sufficient opportunities for informal outdoor play 5. 1. Recognise and reflect the benefits of Local Plan Core Strategy; children playing outdoors close to where Council Plan.

they live in Council workstreams and   within the development management process. This includes play on informal open spaces and within streets. Streets should be designed so they can accommodate children’s play in accordance with Play England guidance.

6. 2. Work with local communities and Sports Facilities and Playing parish councils to plan Playdays that Pitch Strategy.

follow the Play England model and are  linked to the Good Life initiative.

100

References and Additional Bibliography

References

CABE (2004) Public Attitudes to Architecture and Public Space: Transforming Neighbourhoods, by MORI (unpublished). In Blue Sky, Green Space: Understanding the importance of retaining good quality Parks and Green Spaces and the contribution they can make to Improving People’s Lives Executive Summary (GreenSpace, 2011)

Department of Communities and Local Government (2012) National Planning Policy Framework. www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy- framework--2 eftec and Sheffield Hallam University (2013) Green Infrastructure’s contribution to economic growth: a review. A Final Report for Defra and Natural England. Eftec, London.

Grahn P. and Stigsdotter U.A. (2003) Landscape planning and stress, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 2 (1): 1-18. In Blue Sky, Green Space: Understanding the importance of retaining good quality Parks and Green Spaces and the contribution they can make to Improving People’s Lives Executive Summary (GreenSpace, 2011)

GreenSpace (2011) Blue Sky, Green Space: Understanding the Contribution Parks and Green Spaces can make to Improving People’s Lives. Full Report. www.greenspace.org.uk/resources/GreenLINK/

Landscape Institute (2011) Local Green Infrastructure: Helping communities make the most of their landscape. www.landscapeinstitute.org/policy/

Landscape Institute (2010) Making it Home: the power of landscape to create good housing. Position Statement. www.landscapeinstitute.org.uk/PDF/Contribute/MakingithomeA4final.pdf

Natural England (2010) Nature Nearby – Accessible Natural Green Space. www.natruralengland.org.uk/publications/

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2002) Living Places: Cleaner, Safer, Greener. www.communities.gov.uk

Additional Bibliography

Cannock Chase AONB Management Plan 2014-2019. www.cannock-chase.co.uk

Council of Europe (2004) European Landscape Convention www.coe.int/t/dg4/culture/heritage/Landscape/default_en.asp

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2011) The Natural Choice: securing

101

the value of nature. www.gov.uk/govenrnment/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file228842/ 8082.pdf

HM Government (2010) Healthy Lives, Healthy People: Our Strategy for Public Health in England. TSO

HM Government (2011) Localism Act 2011. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/20/contents/enacted

HM Government (2006) Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/16/contents

Natural England (2009) Green Infrastructure Guidance (NE176) www.naturalengland.org.uk/publications/publication/35033

Nortoft (2014) South Staffordshire Sports Facilities and Playing Pitch Strategy 2013- 2028 Final Report. www.sstaffs.gov.uk South Staffordshire Council (2012) A Local Plan for South Staffordshire. Core Strategy Development Plan Document. Adopted 11th December 2012. www.sstaffs.gov.uk

South Staffordshire Council (2012) Conservation Area Appraisals and Management Plans 2010. www.sstaffs.gov.uk

South Staffordshire Council (2012) South Staffordshire Council Plan 2012-2016. www.sstaffs.gov.uk

South Staffordshire Local Strategic Partnership (2008) Sustainable Community Strategy 2008-2020. www.southstaffspartnership.co.uk

102

Appendices

Appendix 1 – Quality and Value Site Assessment Sheet templates

South Staffordshire Council OPEN SPACE AUDIT QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Site ID: Survey date: Site Name: Surveyor: Nearest village:

Open space Amenity greenspace Young people & children typology: Natural & semi-natural Allotments Cemeteries & Green corridors churchyards Parks & gardens Civic spaces

General site description

QUALITY

Very Very good Good Average Poor poor

A welcoming place N/A 5 4 3 2 1 Is it welcoming? Good and safe access Signage and legibility Equal access for all

Comments:

Healthy, safe and secure N/A 5 4 3 2 1 Safe facilities and environment Quality of facilities Personal security Dog fouling

Comments:

Clean and well maintained N/A 5 4 3 2 1 Litter Vandalism/graffiti Grounds maintenance Infrastructure maintenance Equipment maintenance

Comments:

Conservation management* N/A 5 4 3 2 1 Vegetation management Biodiversity management Landscape features Buildings & structures

Comments:

South Staffordshire Council

OPEN SPACE AUDIT VALUE ASSESSMENT

Site ID: Survey date: Site Name: Surveyor: Nearest village:

Open space Amenity greenspace Young people & children typology: Natural & semi-natural Allotments Green corridors Cemeteries & churchyards Parks & gardens Civic spaces

General site description

VALUE

High value Medium value Low value N/A

Context

Comments:

High value Medium value Low value N/A

Level and Type of Use

Comments:

Wider Benefits High value Medium value Low value N/A

Structural and Landscape Benefits

Ecological/ Biodiversity Benefits

Educational Benefits

Health and Well-Being Benefits and Social Inclusion

Climate Change and Pollution

Amenity Benefits and a ‘sense of place’

Historic and Cultural Benefits

Comments:

Appendix 2 – Quality Scoring Definitions and Value Assessment Criteria

Scoring definitions - Very good (5) Good (4) Average (3) Poor (2) Very poor (1) QUALITY

Litter No evidence Limited evidence Some evidence but does not detract Increasing evidence that might deter Extensive evidence that would deter from the cleanliness or attraction of some users any users the site

Vandalism/graffiti No evidence of vandalism or graffiti Limited evidence of vandalism or graffiti Some evidence but does not detract Increasing evidence that might deter Extensive evidence that would deter

from the cleanliness or attraction of some users any users the site

Reasonably clean and tidy; potential Some questions regarding cleanliness; Clear evidence of a lack of Grounds maintenance & Clean and tidy; well maintained site Clean and tidy; good maintenance for some improvement some obvious improvement needed maintenance; uninviting management (planting beds, inviting to users; Possibly an example grass, trees etc.) of good practice

Clear lack of maintenance that detracts Infrastructure maintenance Well maintained; no visible defects, Well maintained; only very minor Visible signs of decay but not so Some questions regarding users; potentially creates a hazard (paths, wall, gates fences etc.) crisp edges where adjoining other defects severe as to detract from the overall maintenance; some obvious remedial

Clean and well maintained well and Clean materials/surfaces quality of the site work needed

Some questions regarding Clear lack of maintenance; unusable; Equipment maintenance (Play, Well maintained; no visible defects Well maintained; only very minor Some issues but not so severe as to maintenance; some obvious remedial potentially creates a hazard exercise, benches etc.) defects detract from the overall quality of the work needed site

Safe equipment & facilities (e.g. Equipment and surfaces in excellent Equipment in good condition; Equipment in reasonable condition; Equipment in poor condition; some Equipment in very poor condition; safety information, lifebelts, trees condition; appropriate fencing to appropriate and suitable surfaces across appropriate surfaces but potential for questions regarding safety; surface clear safety concerns; inappropriate provide shade, functional & protect equipment/ensure safety; the majority of the site; sufficient safety some improvement; some safety appropriate but in poor condition; surfaces; no safety measures in place imaginative play, appropriate equipment appropriate for the site measures in place measures in place limited safety measure in place surfaces)

Quality of facilities Very high quality facilities; excellent Good quality facilities; well designed; Reasonable quality facilities but Weak design; some questions Very poor in all respects; unattractive design; highly attractive to users attractive to users potential for some improvement regarding attractiveness to users to users

Sight lines interrupted but unlikely to Difficult to see routes through the site; Personal security Very clear sight lines; open aspects; Mostly clear sight lines; majority of open Site feels very enclosed with obvious deter the majority of users. Sense of Feels enclosed; likely to deter some very well used site aspects; good level of use places for potential ambush. Likely to partial enclosure users deter the majority of users

Healthy, safe and secure and Healthy,safe Some evidence but acceptable in the Increasing evidence that might deter Dog fouling No evidence Limited evidence Extensive evidence that would deter context/size of the site some users most users

Some good elements but scope for Few elements present to create a Appropriate provision All elements combine to create a very The majority of elements combine to Lack of any significant elements improvement valued site high value site create a valued site resulting in a site of little user value

Vegetation management Management exemplar Management practices having a clear Some good practice but scope for Some questions regarding Management practice inappropriate (woodland, grassland, scrub etc.) impact improvement management decisions and detrimental

Biodiversity (habitats, including Management exemplar; Provides a provides a limited range of good quality water bodies) Very limited range of reasonable Evidence of decline in the quality of No consideration given to habitat very varied range of high quality habitats quality habitats habitats management or creation habitats; clearly attractive to wildlife

The importance of the feature is The importance of the feature is There is limited recognition of the The feature is showing signs of being The feature is in a very poor state and Landscape features (e.g. veteran clearly understood and reflected in recognised and they are well conserved importance of the feature degraded it is obvious that its importance is not Conservation trees, woodlands, heath, key views best practice on site understood etc.)

The importance of the building/ The importance of the building/ There is limited recognition of the The building/structure is showing signs The building/structure is in a very poor Buildings & structures structure is clearly understood and structure is recognised and they are well importance of the building/structure of being degraded state and it is obvious that its reflected in best practice on site conserved importance is not understood

Scoring definitions - Very good (5) Good (4) Average (3) Poor (2) Very poor (1) QUALITY contd.

Welcoming (i.e. are the entrances Easy to find; welcoming sign; clear Clear entrance and well maintained; Fairly obvious entrance; maintained to Apparent as an entrance but no clear Limited entrance, uninviting; not easily seen, easily accessible etc.) entrances; clean and inviting Clean; appropriate size; a reasonable level; clean and signage; potential for better maintained appropriately; difficulty accessible to most potential users maintenance; some users might have with access difficulty with access

Good & safe access Unsuitable materials; many areas not Unsuitable materials and significant Suitable materials in excellent Suitable materials in good condition; Suitable materials but scope for

level; no obvious routes for faults; discouraging for both condition; clearly marked routes for routes allow for pedestrians and cyclists; improvement; routes for pedestrians pedestrians and cyclists; clear issues pedestrians and cyclists pedestrians and cyclists; level for Generally level; can be accessed by and cyclist present but not obvious; present regarding safety safe use; nothing to impede disabled disabled users safely majority of surface level; Some

users in terms of safety questions over safety Signage & interpretation Waymarked routes; high quality Waymarked routes; limited No waymarked routes but some No waymarked routes; very limited No waymarked routes; no interpretation; signage in excellent interpretation; signage in good limited interpretation in reasonable interpretation that needs replacing interpretation

A welcoming place Awelcoming condition; easy to follow and condition; easy to follow and informative condition. Clear scope for informative improvement

Equal access for all (i.e can the site be accessed by the disabled Good disabled access throughout; Good disabled access in most areas Disabled access in some areas; scope Some issues regarding disable access Limited disabled access or very including wheelchair users) specific facilities and pathways for improvement restricted provided

ASSESSING VALUE

Element of value Description Criteria for judging value Context Inaccessible spaces (ie. sites that can’t Low Value = Poor access with be accessed or that are located too far other well utilised sites of the away from the communities that will same type in close proximity use them) are of no relevance to potential users so have little or no Medium Value = Access is ok. value, irrespective of their quality. A There may be other sites nearby space which is of low or mediocre which offer the same amount of quality may still be highly valuable if it value. is the only space of its type in the local area. High Value = Good access and is the only site of this type in the The exception to this are spaces which local area (or is part of the are a part of the historic environment, historic environment). spaces with designations (SAC; SSSI; LNR, SBI etc.) and spaces with a strong cultural element (e.g. that include unique features; memorials etc.) which will always be of high value no matter how accessible they are or of what condition they are in. Level and Type of Use Poorly used spaces may be of little Low Value = The site shows little value. evidence of positive use and has very limited wildlife interest Spaces which are well used by either species or wildlife are always of high Medium Value = Some evidence value that the site enjoys sufficient use by people or some wildlife use but not in abundance/particularly species rich.

High Value = Well used by people/wildlife. Species richness also is a specific form of high usage. WIDER BENEFITS

Structural and Landscape Well located, high quality open spaces Low Value = Location of site is Benefits help to define the character of an area not prominent and does not help by contributing positively to the define the landscape character. surrounding landscape and structurally Separation between areas is separate areas of built development either not seen or in a small (e.g. it may help to define village amount. boundaries or separate built areas within villages) Medium Value = Somewhere between

High Value = The site positively and crucially defines the local landscape character and/or plays a clear and important structural role Ecological/Biodiversity A site which is suitably diverse may Low Value = Site encourages Benefits provide habitats for wildlife and may very little wildlife diversity, exhibit geological features promotion of individual protected or important specifies or is not adjacent to an area of wildlife interest

Medium Value = Some relation to designated sites and contains habitats that aim to encourage wildlife.

High Value = Related to a designated site (SBIs, SSSI, SNCI, LNR, RIGS, SPA etc) and helps alleviate urban impacts like pollution.

Educational Benefits Offers an opportunity to see nature at Low Value = Very limited work, the integration of historic opportunities for education buildings and features in the landscape about nature or heritage and the influence people can have upon natural heritage Medium Value = Somewhere in between

High Value = Obvious, uncommon and numerous opportunities for education about nature or heritage Health and Well-Being Open spaces can promote social Low Value = The site offers little Benefits and Social inclusion in their role as publicly to attract a wide range of Inclusion accessible facilities that are open to users/age groups, and offers everyone, irrespective of background. little opportunity for outdoor Similarly, civic and heritage features leisure or community events of importance to the local community can help to promote social inclusion. Medium Value = Some significant opportunities for The use of open spaces can also help community use, but few signs of to promote healthy lifestyles and actual use. reduce stress. High Value = The site is used by a range of users/age groups for a variety of activities ( e.g. walking, health-trail, dog- walking, sitting, events) Climate Change and Open spaces can help to reduce the Low Value = The site has limited Pollution impacts of climate change. For attributes (e.g. few trees, no example, they can provide trees to flood plain etc) absorb carbon emissions (particularly where near transport infrastructure), Medium Value = Somewhere in opportunities for transport without between needing a car (eg. green corridors) and by acting as low-lying areas of High Value = The site has good flood storage areas during times of examples of numerous attributes high rainfall. (eg. heavy woodland, flood plain, opportunities to avoid motor transport) Amenity Benefits and a Open spaces which are safe, well- Low Value = The site does not ‘sense of place’ maintained and attractive can help to positively benefit the make an area an attractive place in appearance of the area (for which to live, and can also help to example by being an attractive provide local landmarks in housing visual landmark) or does not areas. perform a role as a visual buffer to development or traffic

Medium Value = Somewhere between

High Value = The site contributes an attractive feature

within the built environment and/or is a valuable visual screen

Historic and Cultural Open spaces can contain listed Low Value = No Benefits buildings, a historic environment, historic/culturally important conservation areas or evidence of features on site culturally important uses (as examples) Medium Value = Some limited elements of historic/culturally important features

High Value = Contains numerous examples of historic/culturally important features (eg. signage or memorials), or a single very important element of this type (eg. a unique and important historic building/feature)

Appendix 3 – Open Space Comparator Standards

Proposed standards from other authorities Civic spaces Natural and semi- Allotments Amenity Greenspace natural greenspace Lichfield Not deemed “The existing Standard for No specific standard appropriate for standards of 21ha Allotments - 1 set (relied on a plot per 32 quantitative per 1,000 households on 10minute catchment standard population should large instead) be maintained developments. and existing sites should be protected.”

Chorley Not deemed 4.64ha per 1000 0.08 per 1000 0.73ha per 1000 appropriate for quantitative standard Hinckley and No quantity 2ha per 1000 0.319 per 1000 0.60ha per 1000 Bosworth standard set for civic spaces High Peak Separate standards are given for inside and outside the National Park; therefore not comparable to District-wide standards. Amber Valley No ha per 1000 BC standards for any typology in adopted SPD West No quantity 1.84ha per 1000 0.08 per 1000 1.35ha per 1000 Lancashire BC standard set of civic spaces Staffordshire Outdated (2004) Moorlands DC strategy with non-comparable typologies Newark and No quantity 0.5ha per 1000 0.6ha per 1000 Sherwood DC standard set for civic spaces Gedling BC No quantity 4.86ha per 1000 Rural - 30 0.52 ha per 1000 standard set for allotment plots civic spaces per 1000 households

Stafford BC Don’t appear to specify generic quantity

standards in their recommendations Rugby BC Can’t access their study (website issues) Broadland DC 2007- out of date South 2005- out of date Derbyshire DC North Jan 2008- out of Warwickshire date BC

Appendix 4 – Open Space Audit Site Assessment Results

Site Details – Overall AMENITY Scores GREENSPACE: Site ID Site Name Nearest village General Site Description Quality Value

KAM141 Playing Field, Dimmingsdale Lower Penn Doesn't appear to have amenity 0.00000000 0.00000000 Road, Lower Penn greenspace junction, private ownership

KAM140 Recreation ground Lower Penn Lower Penn Recreation Ground 93.84615385 95.23809524

KAM113 Incidental Open Space, Jn. Hatherton 92.72727273 66.66666667 Four Crosses Lane and Catsbridge Lane, Hatherton

KAM148 Sports Ground, Station Drive, Coven (Four Land surrounding playing pitch by pub 78.33333333 66.66666667 Four Ashes Ashes)

LJK359 Land at junction of Wood Codsall 86.66666667 58.33333333 Rd/Bakers Way

KAM050a Linking Path between St. Mary's Shareshill Footpath 91.66666667 73.33333333 Close and School Lane

KAM116 Joeys Lane Playing Field (2) Bilbrook Land surrounding playing field 80.00000000 76.19047619

KAM067 Long Lane, Springhill Great Wyrley / 95.38461538 83.33333333 Essington KAM084 Between Broad Lane and Bursnips Essington 78.33333333 58.33333333 Road, Springhill

MJH24 Public Footpath section through Bishops Wood 90.00000000 75.00000000 Bishops Wood

MJH23 Bishops Wood Paying Field. off Bishops Wood 73.84615385 76.19047619 Brookside Close

MJH21 Blymhill Playing Field Blymhill 66.15384615 41.66666667

MJH22 Jubilee Grove, Blymhill Blymhill 92.30769231 83.33333333

KAM031 Incidental Open space, Church Dunston 90.00000000 66.66666667 Close, Dunston

LJK322 Land off The Close, Swindon Swindon 90.76923077 66.66666667

LJK330 Himley Playing Field, School Road, Himley 87.27272727 76.19047619 Himley

LJK305 Daneford Gardens, High St., Kinver 94.28571429 86.66666667 Kinver LJK307 Brockley's Walk, Kinver Kinver 92.85714286 87.50000000

LJK308 Dark Lane, Kinver Kinver 95.00000000 75.00000000

LJK338 Land at junction of Fox Rd. and Trysull and Seisdon 95.38461538 73.33333333 Ebstree Rd.

LJK339 Fox Rd. Playing Field Trysull and Seisdon 74.00000000 73.33333333

HBJ378 Tollhouse Way Wombourne Wombourne 74.54545455 85.71428571

LJK381 The Meadlands, Wombourne Wombourne 91.11111111 85.71428571

LJK383 Forge Valley Way, Wombourne Wombourne 87.27272727 66.66666667

LJK375 Bratch Locks Picnic Area, Wombourne Wombourne 76.36363636 83.33333333

LJK373 Bratch Park, Wombourne Wombourne 83.63636364 77.77777778 KAM135 Land adjacent to brook- off Tollhouse Wombourne 87.27272727 77.77777778 Way, Wombourne

KAM136 Incidental green space, Hazel Grove, Wombourne 94.54545455 58.33333333 Wombourne

KAM137 Incidental green space by shops, Bull Wombourne 96.36363636 91.66666667 Lane, Wombourne

KAM138 Incidental green space, Bull Lane, Wombourne 85.45454545 66.66666667 Wombourne

KAM139 Incidental green space, Meadow Lane, Wombourne 92.72727273 66.66666667 Wombourne

LJK380 Brickbridge Lane Playing Fields, Wombourne 78.33333333 80.95238095 Wombourne

LJK379 Informal Public Open Space, Van Wombourne 86.00000000 80.00000000 Diemans Rd, Wombourne

LJK378 Informal Public Open Space, Whites Wombourne 94.00000000 83.33333333 Wood , Wombourne

KAM086 Huntington Recreation Ground Huntington 81.53846154 76.19047619

KAM100 Public Footpath off Stafford Rd, Huntington 56.66666667 80.00000000 Huntington

HBJ115 Open space off Colliers Way, Huntington Huntington 96.36363636 91.66666667

HBJ114a Village Green, Huntington Huntington 95.38461538 91.66666667

KAM099 Open Space between Linnet Close, Huntington 96.36363636 80.00000000 Foxfields Way and Stafford Rd, Huntington

KAM101 Gravel Lane and adjacent land off Huntington Natural / semi natural more 58.18181818 66.66666667 Lowland Rd, Huntington appropriate

KAM104 Woodland Court, Huntington Huntington 94.54545455 66.66666667

KAM105 Linking footpath between Highland Road Huntington 94.54545455 73.33333333 and Chase Walk

KAM103 Public Footpath and Green Buffer, Huntington 89.09090909 50.00000000 Huntington

KAM102 Ling Road Housing Estate Incidental Huntington 81.81818182 46.66666667 Open Spaces, Huntington

KAM098 Open Space between Pillaton Dr. and Huntington 96.36363636 86.66666667 Stag Dr., Huntington

KAM094 Incidental Open Space Stafford Road, Huntington 90.90909091 66.66666667 Huntington

KAM091 Playing Field, Stafford Road, Huntington Huntington 75.38461538 80.95238095

KAM090 Open Space, Stafford Road / Huntsmans Huntington 90.90909091 80.95238095 Rise, Huntington

KAM095 Incidental Open Space Lime Road, Huntington 92.72727273 58.33333333 Huntington

KAM092 Sycamore Way, Huntington Huntington 92.72727273 58.33333333

KAM111 Incidental Open Space, Maple Drive, Huntington 92.72727273 66.66666667 Huntington

KAM112 Incidental Open Space, Oak Avenue, Huntington 96.36363636 66.66666667 Huntington

KAM097 Incidental Open Space Between Silver Huntington 90.90909091 58.33333333 Birch Rd and Oak Ave, Huntington

KAM093 Incidental Open Space Oak Avenue, Huntington 82.00000000 40.00000000 Huntington

KAM072 Brownshore Lane Open Space,Essington Essington 92.00000000 91.66666667

KAM075 Open Space between High Hill and Essington 82.00000000 91.66666667 Kitchen Lane, Essington

KAM074 High Hill / Backhalve Lane, Essington Essington 81.66666667 76.19047619

KAM192 Linking amenity space Rosewood Park to Cheslyn Hay 85.00000000 73.33333333 Forest of Mercia Way

KAM156 Path between Moons' Land and Upper Cheslyn Hay 95.00000000 86.66666667 Landywood Road

MJH72 Pathway from Moon's Lane to Wyrley Cheslyn Hay 78.33333333 80.00000000 and Essington Canal Walk

KAM173 Linking amenity space Dundalk Lane to Cheslyn Hay 90.90909091 73.33333333 Landywood Lane

KAM172 Sutherland Road open space Cheslyn Hay 98.46153846 90.47619048

KAM170 Windsor Road, Cheslyn Hay Cheslyn Hay 80.00000000 60.00000000

KAM183 Recreation Ground, Station Street, Cheslyn Hay 89.09090909 83.33333333 Cheslyn Hay

KAM186 Hatherton Reservoir Hatherton Should be natural / semi-natural 81.81818182 79.16666667

KAM181 Playing Fields - Low Street / Rosemary Cheslyn Hay 85.00000000 90.47619048 Road, Cheslyn Hay

KAM182 Rosemary Road (footpath) Cheslyn Hay 62.22222222 75.00000000

MJH92 Alpha Way Great Wyrley 83.63636364 60.00000000

KAM070 Gorsemoor Way,Essington Essington 94.54545455 66.66666667

KAM071 Rowan Drive,Essington Essington 81.66666667 66.66666667

MJH91 Tower View Road, Landywood Great Wyrley 94.54545455 66.66666667

KAM229 Kingswear Avenue to Richmond Drive Perton 89.09090909 80.00000000

KAM069 Between Larchmere Drive and Essington 94.54545455 75.00000000 Gorsemoor Way,Essington

KAM076 Open Space behind flats off Hill Street, Essington 82.00000000 80.00000000 Essington

KAM079 Parks Crescent, Essington Essington 89.09090909 53.33333333

KAM077 Linking Tudor Close, Moseley Close and Essington 96.36363636 66.66666667 Swynnerton Drive, Essington

KAM078 Between Swynnerton Drive and Essington 96.36363636 77.77777778 Hawthorne Road, Essington

LJK345 Pattingham Playing Field, off High Street, Pattingham Playing field of High Street 83.07692308 95.23809524 Pattingham

MJH88 Ajax Close (2), Anson Road Estate Great Wyrley 58.00000000 46.66666667

MJH89 Leander Close / Ramillies Crescent, Great Wyrley 88.00000000 66.66666667 Anson Road Estate

MJH84 Oxley Close, Anson Road Estate Great Wyrley 82.00000000 91.66666667

MJH87 Ajax Close (1), Anson Road Estate Great Wyrley 90.00000000 75.00000000

MJH86 Norfolk Grove (2), Anson Road Estate Great Wyrley 69.09090909 40.00000000

MJH85 Norfolk Grove (1), Anson Road Estate Great Wyrley 74.54545455 46.66666667

MJH81 Pendrel Close Great Wyrley 80.00000000 46.66666667

MJH77 Dunston Close Great Wyrley 80.00000000 66.66666667

MJH82 Weston Drive (North) Great Wyrley 80.00000000 58.33333333

MJH83 Weston Drive (2) Great Wyrley 81.81818182 75.00000000

MJH80 Weston Drive Great Wyrley 64.61538462 77.77777778

MJH79 Chillington Close/Weston Drive Great Wyrley 87.27272727 66.66666667

MJH93 Yemscroft Open Space, Walsall Road Great Wyrley 60.00000000 50.00000000

KAM151 Jones Lane Playing Field - Amenity Space Great Wyrley 0.00000000 0.00000000 only

KAM155 Brooklands Avenue - land next to stream Great Wyrley 67.27272727 66.66666667

KAM153 Playing Fields off Hazel Lane / Walsall Great Wyrley 58.46153846 71.42857143 Road

KAM157 Footpath along brook - between Hall Great Wyrley 78.46153846 80.95238095 Lane and Quinton Avenue

KAM189 Mitre Road Incidental Open Space Cheslyn Hay 94.54545455 58.33333333

KAM171 Open Space, Bridge Avenue Cheslyn Hay 63.33333333 79.16666667

KAM187 Open Space - jnc. High Street and Pinfold Cheslyn Hay 96.36363636 75.00000000 Lane

KAM175 Land off Pinfold Lane Cheslyn Hay 93.33333333 77.77777778 KAM179 Public Footpath off Pinfold Lane Cheslyn Hay 92.72727273 86.66666667

KAM176 Kestrel Way open space Cheslyn Hay 88.00000000 73.33333333

MJH75 Land off Lapwing Close Cheslyn Hay 90.90909091 93.33333333

KAM177 Dundalk Lane Cheslyn Hay 96.00000000 66.66666667 MJH71 Highfields Park (2) junction with Cheslyn Hay 98.00000000 83.33333333 Bramwell Drive

KAM174 Kestrel Way Cheslyn Hay 90.90909091 58.33333333 MJH70 Highfields Park (1) junction with Moon's Cheslyn Hay 94.00000000 83.33333333 Lane

KAM168 Brook Lane / John's Lane (Library) Great Wyrley 54.54545455 40.00000000

KAM169 Teford Avenue, Great Wyrley Great Wyrley 94.54545455 73.33333333

MJH96 18-36 Brook Lane Great Wyrley 94.54545455 58.33333333

KAM161 Amenity Greenspace adjacent to Health Great Wyrley 86.15384615 73.33333333 Centre, Landywood Lane

KAM158 Great Wyrley Recreation Ground, Great Wyrley 90.00000000 85.71428571 Landywood Lane

KAM166a Walsall Road / Hilton Lane incidental Great Wyrley 83.33333333 46.66666667 open space

KAM163 Broadmeadow Lane incidental open Great Wyrley 94.54545455 58.33333333 space

KAM164 Broadmeadow Lane incidental open Great Wyrley 90.00000000 66.66666667 space

KAM165 The Crescent incidental open space off Great Wyrley 80.00000000 46.66666667 Broadmeadow Lane

KAM050b Linking Path between School Lane and Featherstone & 88.88888889 66.66666667 Manor Drive Shareshill

KAM050a Linking Path between St. Mary's Close Featherstone & 86.66666667 66.66666667 and School Lane Shareshill

KAM063 Open Space / Playing Field - Oaks Drive, Featherstone & 93.33333333 100.00000000 Featherstone Shareshill

KAM059 Open Space - Oaks Drive, Featherstone Featherstone & 90.90909091 66.66666667 Shareshill / Brinsford

KAM049 Green Buffer between East Road and Featherstone & 91.42857143 88.88888889 Oaks Drive Shareshill

KAM062 Open Space - Oaks Drive, Featherstone Featherstone & 84.00000000 60.00000000 Shareshill

KAM061 Open Space - East Road (2), Featherstone Featherstone & 90.90909091 58.33333333 Shareshill / Brinsford

KAM060 Open Space - East Road (1), Featherstone Featherstone & 92.72727273 60.00000000 Shareshill / Brinsford

KAM058 Open Space - Jnc. of New Road and East Featherstone & 87.27272727 66.66666667 Road, Featherstone Shareshill

KAM064 Open Space - Jnc. of New Road and East Featherstone & 87.27272727 66.66666667 Road, Featherstone Shareshill / Brinsford

KAM065 Park Road, Hilton Featherstone & Area of hardstanding with fence 88.00000000 53.33333333 Shareshill around it

KAM039 Footpath between Baneberry Drive and Featherstone & 98.18181818 83.33333333 Speedwell Gardens Shareshill

KAM041 Footpath off Baneberry Drive Featherstone & 90.00000000 66.66666667 Shareshill

KAM038 Footpath between Old Lane and Featherstone & 83.63636364 83.33333333 Baneberry Drive Shareshill

KAM040 Footpath between Baneberry Drive and Featherstone & 96.36363636 66.66666667 Speedwell Gardens Shareshill

KAM053a Linking Path between Cannock Road and Featherstone & 77.50000000 55.55555556 Hilton Road Shareshill

KAM053 Linking path between Hilton Road and Featherstone & 82.00000000 66.66666667 Olde Hall Road Shareshill

KAM056 Off Hilton Road - Incidental Open Space Featherstone & 90.90909091 66.66666667 to residential development Shareshill

KAM037 Featherstone Community Centre Featherstone & 96.36363636 80.00000000 Shareshill

KAM054 Woodcock Gardens, Featherstone Featherstone & 94.00000000 58.33333333 Shareshill

KAM044 Open Space between Thistledown Drive, Featherstone & 98.18181818 75.00000000 Dunlin Close, Larkspur Drive and Teasel Shareshill Grove

KAM055 Open Space linking Whilmot Close and Featherstone & 94.54545455 75.00000000 Pendrell Close Shareshill

KAM043 Open Space between Teasel Grove and Featherstone & 98.18181818 75.00000000 Turnstone Drive Shareshill

KAM019c Incidental Open Space off Vale Gardens, Penkridge 84.00000000 53.33333333 Penkridge

KAM028 Incidental Open Space off Manorfield Penkridge 92.72727273 66.66666667 Close, Penkridge

KAM019b Rockhouse - Open Space, east of Vale Penkridge 90.90909091 86.66666667 Gardens

KAM022 Former Vale Gardens Play Area, Penkridge 83.07692308 86.66666667 Penkridge - now classed as amenity O.S.

KAM021b Open Space adjacent to Old Peoples Penkridge Is now a nursing home 0.00000000 0.00000000 Home

MJH31 Marston Road Playing Field, Wheaton Wheaton Aston Playing fields 67.14285714 75.00000000 Aston

MJH28 Land at Sowdley Grove, Wheaton Aston Wheaton Aston 85.00000000 93.33333333

KAM011 Druids Way Green Space Penkridge 89.09090909 73.33333333

KAM004 Cherrybrook Drive, Penkridge Penkridge 86.00000000 73.33333333

KAM018 Haling Dene Centre, Penkridge Penkridge 92.30769231 90.47619048

KAM15a Princefield, off Templars Way Penkridge 96.36363636 71.42857143

KAM012 Wolgarston Way Open Space Buffer Penkridge 74.00000000 80.95238095

KAM027 Incidental Open Space off St Modwena Penkridge 85.45454545 91.66666667 Way, Penkridge

KAM009 Open Space Buffer adjacent M6 off St. Penkridge 81.42857143 100.00000000 Modwena Way

MJH46 Playing Field, Engleton Lane, Brewood Brewood 88.00000000 83.33333333

MJH40 25-51 Kiddemore Green Road, Brewood Brewood 81.81818182 50.00000000

MJH50 Oak Court, Oak Road, Brewood Brewood 86.00000000 46.66666667

MJH49 Oak Road, Brewood Brewood 94.54545455 73.33333333

MJH47 Informal Public Open Space, Deansfield Brewood 89.23076923 58.33333333 Road, Brewood

MJH48 Deansfield Close, Brewood Brewood 90.00000000 58.33333333

MJH51 Timber Grove to Stonebridge Road, Brewood 62.22222222 55.55555556 Brewood

MJH61 Coven Playing Field, School Lane, Coven Coven 77.50000000 44.44444444

MJH55 Lower Green, off Poplars Farm Way Coven 100.00000000 94.44444444

MJH57 Chambley Green incidental open space, Coven 86.66666667 60.00000000 Coven

LJK358 Informal Public Open Space, Moatbrook Codsall 80.00000000 83.33333333 Lane, Codsall

LJK361 Informal Public Open Space, Walton Codsall 92.00000000 75.00000000 Gardens, Codsall

LJK348a Village Hall Playing Field, Codsall 87.27272727 85.71428571 Wolverhampton Rd. Codsall

LJK360 Informal Public Open Space, Vaughan Codsall 92.30769231 72.22222222 Gardens, Codsall

LJK370 Informal Public Open Space, Codsall Codsall 91.66666667 85.71428571 House, Codsall

LJK349 Informal Public Open Space, Codsall 80.00000000 85.71428571 Wolverhampton Rd. Codsall

LJK362 Informal Public Open Space, Chillington Codsall 94.00000000 66.66666667 Drive, Codsall

KAM122 Chapel Lane Playing Field, Codsall Codsall 52.00000000 38.88888889

LJK353 Land opposite St Nicholas's Church, Codsall 81.81818182 58.33333333 Church Rd.

KAM121 Green Buffer, Duck Lane, Bilbrook Bilbrook Very attractive green space. 80.00000000 76.19047619 Structure/landscape benefits high

KAM120 Informal Public Open Space, Oakleigh Bilbrook Grass/Greenery around footpath 78.46153846 72.22222222 Drive, Bilbrook

KAM119 Informal Public Open Space, Elm Grove, Bilbrook 78.46153846 76.19047619 Bilbrook

KAM118 Open Space, Lime Tree Road, Bilbrook Bilbrook Pointless bit of grass 65.00000000 42.85714286

KAM117 Recreation Amenity, Bilbrook Rd, Bilbrook 60.00000000 47.61904762 Bilbrook.

LJK363 Millennium Way Open Space, Bilbrook Bilbrook 73.84615385 87.50000000

KAM204 Edgehill Drive to The Parkway Perton 78.18181818 77.77777778

KAM205 Edgehill Drive Perton 86.00000000 83.33333333

KAM221 Nash Avenue Perton 89.09090909 44.44444444

KAM224 Severn Drive and The Parkway Perton 65.00000000 66.66666667 KAM213 Lytham Road to The Parkway Perton 86.66666667 75.00000000 KAM214 Moor Park to Gleneagles Road Perton 86.00000000 77.77777778

KAM223 Hoylake Road Perton 78.00000000 55.55555556 KAM220 Repton Avenue to Hawksmoor Drive Perton 83.63636364 50.00000000

KAM209 Wren Avenue to Pugin Close Perton 76.36363636 41.66666667 KAM210 Barley Croft to Cornhill Grove Perton 78.18181818 66.66666667

KAM212 Coulter Grove to Leasowes Drive Perton 92.00000000 66.66666667 KAM211 The Cartway to Coulter Gove Perton 76.36363636 80.00000000

KAM227 Incidental Open Space between Perton 78.18181818 66.66666667 Tangmere Close and The Parkway

KAM126 Amenity Open Space off The Parkway, Perton 92.72727273 86.66666667 Perton

KAM129 Amenity Greenspace off Mercia Drive Perton 85.45454545 80.00000000

KAM128 Dippons Lane Perton 77.77777778 100.00000000

KAM130 Amenity Greenspace linking Idonia Rd., Perton 89.09090909 77.77777778 Dippons Lane and Penda Grove

KAM131 Amenity Greenspace linking Penda Grove Perton 66.00000000 77.77777778 and Dippons Lane

KAM132 Amenity Greenspace linking Mercia Drive Perton 80.00000000 66.66666667 and Athelstan Gardens

KAM133 Amenity Greenspace linking Athelstan Perton 80.00000000 58.33333333 Gardens and Harald Close

KAM134 Greenspace linking Harald Cl., Cornovian Perton 88.00000000 55.55555556 C.l., Offa's Dr. and Egelwin Cl.

KAM218 Cheshire Grove to Cunningham Road Perton 89.09090909 75.00000000

KAM219 Crowland Avenue to Jedburgh Avenue Perton 74.54545455 58.33333333

KAM222 Ennerdale Drive to Rydal Drive Perton 88.00000000 44.44444444

KAM202 Avon Close Perton 56.00000000 55.55555556

KAM201 Sandown Drive to The Parkway, Perton Perton 60.00000000 77.77777778

KAM228 Benson Close, Perton Perton 82.00000000 41.66666667

KAM215 Hudson Grove to Scampton Close Perton 78.18181818 41.66666667

KAM217 Shackleton Drive to Gaydon Close Perton 94.54545455 46.66666667

KAM216 Shackleton Drive Perton 80.00000000 41.66666667

KAM226 Milton Court, Coleridge Drive, Perton Perton 95.55555556 50.00000000

KAM148 Sports Ground, Station Drive, Four Ashes Coven Grass around football pitch off A449 71.66666667 55.55555556

KAM207 off Dunster Grove Perton 78.00000000 50.00000000

KAM208 off Richmond Drive Perton 92.50000000 58.33333333

KAM203 Naseby Road to Adwalton Road Perton 86.00000000 66.66666667

MJH7 Perton Pavillion and Playing Fields Perton 80.00000000 95.23809524

KAM230 Between Gainsborough Drive and Yew Perton Natural and semi natural elements 76.66666667 95.23809524 Tree Lane

KAM206 Roundway Down to Winceby Road Perton 89.09090909 58.33333333

KAM200 Incidental Open Space off Gainsborough Perton 81.81818182 91.66666667 Drive

LJK367 Joeys Lane Playing Field / Bilbrook Village Bilbrook Playing fields (football) and 90.00000000 88.88888889 Hall basketball

MJH6 Amenity Greenspace linking Richmond Perton 78.18181818 75.00000000 Drive

KAM166 Broadmeadow Lane incidental open Great Wyrley 92.00000000 66.66666667 space

KAM225 Buffer - The Parkway Perton 88.88888889 55.55555556

AVERAGE 83.68535480 69.42568543

Site Details – YOUNG PEOPLE AND CHILDREN: Overall Scores Site ID Site Name Nearest General Site Description Quality Value village

LJK367a Joeys Lane Playing Field / Bilbrook Bilbrook Small well-kept children’s play 100 100 Village Hall area - 2-13 years

KAM082 Playing Field, Cannock Road, Westcroft Essington 80 66.6666667 (Westcroft)

MJH25 Bishops Wood Skate Park. Adjacent to Bishops Skate park – DISMANTLED 88.3333333 58.3333333 Village Hall Wood FOLLOWING 2014 AUDIT

MJH23a Bishops Wood Playing Field Bishops 91.6666667 83.3333333 Wood

LJK330a Play Area - Himley Playing Field, School Himley 92.7272727 66.6666667 Road, Himley

LJK321 Hinksford Lane Play Area, Swindon Swindon 100 66.6666667

LJK309 Marsh Playing Fields Playground Kinver 100 66.6666667

LJK336 Trysull Playing Field 92.7272727 75

LJK372 Bratch Park Play Area, Wombourne Wombourne LEAP 94.5454545 91.6666667

LJK380a Brickbridge Lane Playing Fields, Wombourne MUGA 87.2727273 75 Wombourne

KAM087 Huntington Recreation Ground Huntington Skate park 89.0909091 66.6666667

MJH78 Dunston Close Play Area Great Wyrley 89.0909091 66.6666667

MJH21a Blymhill Playing Field Blymhill 67.6923077 41.6666667

KAM191 Teen Shelter and older children Cheslyn Hay 80 100 provision. Rec Ground, Station Street, Cheslyn Hay

KAM184 Recreation Ground Play Area, Station Cheslyn Hay Play area 92.3076923 91.6666667 Street, Cheslyn Hay

LJK342 Play Equipment, Pattingham Playing Pattingham Play area 86.1538462 73.3333333 Field

LJK345a Playing Fields off High Pattingham MUGA 92.7272727 75 St. Pattingham

LJK344 Golden Jubilee Skate Park, Pattingham Pattingham Skate park 92.7272727 75

LJK340 Burnhill Green Playing Field Pattingham Play area 84.2857143 72.2222222

MJH90 Leander Close Play Great Wyrley 78 50 Area

KAM152 Jones Lane Playing Great Wyrley 60 57.1428571 Fields Play Area

KAM167 Brook Lane Play Area Great Wyrley 88.5714286 73.3333333

KAM159 Great Wyrley Recreation Ground Play Great Wyrley 94.5454545 83.3333333 Area

KAM160 Great Wyrley Recreation Ground Skate Great Wyrley Teen shelter, BMX track, skate 90.7692308 91.6666667 Park, BMX Track and Teen Shelter park

KAM057 Play area - inc. jn. of New Road and East Featherstone & 92.7272727 75 Road, Featherstone Shareshill / Brinsford

KAM047 LEAP - Featherstone Community Centre Featherstone & 98.3333333 83.3333333 Shareshill

KAM045 MUGA - Featherstone Community Featherstone & 96 91.6666667 Centre Shareshill

KAM046 Teen Shelter - Featherstone Community Featherstone & 82 75 Centre Shareshill

KAM052 Open space associated with 114 -150 Featherstone & 94.5454545 66.6666667 Hilton Rd, Featherstone. Shareshill

KAM051 Footpath connecting Cannock Road and Featherstone & 74 55.5555556 Park Road Shareshill

KAM042 Incidental Open Space, Burnet Grove, Featherstone & 94 66.6666667 Featherstone Shareshill

KAM001 Horse Fair Play Area, Penkridge Penkridge 85.4545455 75

KAM026 Skate Park at Monkton Recreation Penkridge 84 50 Centre

KAM002 Kempson Road Play Area, Penkridge Penkridge 90 75

KAM003 Wolverhampton Road Play Area, Penkridge 83.0769231 58.3333333 Penkridge

MJH31b Marston Road, Play Area, Wheaton Wheaton Children's play area 75.7142857 75 Aston Aston

MJH31a Marston Road Playing Field Teen Wheaton Aston 73.8461538 75 Shelter

MJH30 Primrose Close Play Area Wheaton Aston 82.6666667 91.6666667

MJH29 Broadholes Lane Play Area, off High St. Wheaton Aston 85.8823529 80.952381 Wheaton Aston

KAM006 Open Space Buffer adjacent M6 off Penkridge 91.6666667 93.3333333 Heron Drive

MJH46a Playing Field, Engleton Lane, Brewood Brewood Older (skate park) and 98.3333333 100 children's provision

MJH61a Coven Playing Field, School Lane, Coven Coven MUGA/skate park & kids play 85.4545455 50 area MJH59a The Bront Play Area Coven 75.7142857 66.6666667

LJK348 Village Hall Play Equipment, Codsall 93.3333333 83.3333333 Wolverhampton Rd. Codsall

2013 EF KH (also Joeys Lane Playing Fields Skate Park Bilbrook 62.8571429 53.3333333 recorded as KAM116)

LJK317 Brantley Crescent Playground, Bobbington Should be amenity greenspace - 65.4545455 40 Bobbington no longer has any equipment and is overgrown

MJH4 Perton Lakeside play area Perton 95 100

MJH5 Perton Lakeside - older children Perton 95 100 provision

MJH14 Millfields Way Play Area Wombourne 96.9230769 86.6666667

PAW002 Birch Hill Play Area Wombourne Provided through a 2010 planning permission.

AVERAGE 87 74.2

Site Details – CEMETERIES Overall AND CHURCHYARDS: Scores Site ID Site Name Nearest village General Site Quality Value Description HBJ379 Sytch Lane, Cemetery Wombourne 100 95.83333333 KAM107 Church of St. Saviour, Church Lane, Hatherton Just south of the 94.66666667 76.19047619 Hatherton village

KAM030 St. Lawrence's Church, Coppenhall Coppenhall Little Church 90 77.77777778

KAM081 St. John the Evangelist, Wolverhampton Essington 87.69230769 73.33333333 Rd, Essington

KAM083 North Walsall Cemetary, Saddleworth Great Wyrley / 96 61.9047619 Road, Bloxwich Essington

KAM185 Great Wyrley Cemetery. Station Street, Cheslyn Hay 94.28571429 73.33333333 Cheslyn Hay

KAM034 St. James' Church, Penkridge Road, Acton Trussell 94.28571429 77.77777778 Acton Trussell

KAM035 All Saints' Church, Common Lane, Bednall 93.84615385 80 Bednall

MJH39 St. John the Evangelist Church, Bishops Wood 88.75 88.88888889 Kiddemore Green Road, Bishops Wood

KAM032 St. Leonard's Church off A449, Dunston Dunston 93.84615385 86.66666667

KAM035 All Saints' Church, Common Lane, Bednall 95.38461538 83.33333333 Bednall

LJK331 St. Michael and All Angels Church, Himley 93.75 71.42857143 Dudley Road, Himley

LJK323 St. John's Church, Swindon Kinver 97.33333333 80.95238095

LJK302 St. Peter's Church Graveyard, Kinver Kinver 93.33333333 73.33333333

LJK303 Comber Ridge Burial Ground Kinver 93.33333333 66.66666667

LJK301 St. Peter's Church, Kinver Kinver 91.25 83.33333333

LJK334 All Saints' Church, Trysull Trysull 94.66666667 79.16666667

LJK377 St Benedicts Biscop Church, Church Rd, Wombourne 92.30769231 73.33333333 Wombourne

MJH37 St. John's Church, Stretton Wheaton Aston 90.66666667 80 (Stretton)

MJH35a All Saints' Church Graveyard, Lapley Lapley 86.66666667 44.44444444

MJH35 All Saints' Church, Lapley Lapley 91.42857143 88.88888889

MJH20 St. Mary's Church, Blymhill 88.57142857 83.33333333 Blymhill

MJH20a St. Mary's Church Graveyard, Blymhill Blymhill 91.66666667 73.33333333

LJK324 St. Mary's Church, Enville Enville 95 83.33333333

LJK315 Holy Cross Church, Bobbington Bobbington 90.66666667 88.88888889

KAM180 Cheslyn Hay Cemetery Cheslyn Hay 83.63636364 77.77777778

LJK341 St. Chad's Church, Pattingham Pattingham 96 76.19047619

KAM154 St. Mark's Church, Station Road, Great Great Wyrley 88.57142857 71.42857143 Wyrley

KAM050 St. Mary's Church, Church Road, Shareshill 96 80.95238095 Shareshill

KAM024 St. Michael's and All Angels Church, Penkridge 83.07692308 77.77777778 Station Road, Penkridge

KAM025 St. Michael's and All Angels Burial Penkridge 94.28571429 80.95238095 Ground, Pinfold Lane, Penkridge

MJH27 St. Mary's Church, Wheaton Aston Wheaton Aston 98.46153846 93.33333333

MJH43 St. Mary's & St. Chad's Church, Church Brewood 94.66666667 93.33333333 Road, Brewood

MJH41 St. Mary's RC Church, Kiddemore Green Brewood 93.33333333 91.66666667 Road, Brewood

MJH60 St. Paul's Church, Church Lane, Coven Coven 81.42857143 77.77777778

MJH60a St. Paul's Churchyard Extension, off Coven 78.57142857 50 Church Lane, Coven

LJK354 St Nicholas's Church, Church Rd. Codsall Codsall 95 85.18518519

LJK355 St Nicholas's Church Cemetery, Church Codsall 95 85.18518519 Rd. Codsall

HBJ379 Sytch Lane, Cemetery Wombourne 100 83.33333333

AVERAGE 92.24 78.72

Site Details – CIVIC AND HERITAGE SPACES: Overall Scores Site ID Site Name Nearest General Site Description Quality Value village

KAM080 Millennium feature, Wolverhampton Rd, Essington 80 72.22222222 Essington LJK328 Edge Fort and Rock Houses Kinver 88.5714286 95.83333333

LJK327 War Memorial, Comber Rd, Kinver Kinver 98.1818182 93.33333333

KAM142 Village Green, Lower Penn Lower Penn Village Green 90 60

LJK347 Seating Area and Parish Notice Board, Burnhill Pattingham Seating area and parish 94 73.33333333 Green noticeboard

KAM108 Hatherton Parish Rooms Hatherton 86.6666667 72.22222222

HBJ001 Village Green, junction of Joey’s Lane/Bilbrook Bilbrook 93.3333333 66.66666667 Road, Bilbrook

LJK306 Jubilee Gardens, High St., Kinver Kinver 92.8571429 85.18518519

LJK329 Shelter and associated greenspace Kinver 100 86.66666667

LJK335 The Green off School Lane, Trysull Trysull 88.3333333 71.42857143

LJK337 Commemorative Stone School Lane, Trysull Trysull 90 75

MJH38 War Memorial, Lapley Lane, Stretton Wheaton Aston 86.1538462 100 (Stretton)

MJH36 Village Green off Church Lane, Lapley Lapley 90.7692308 88.88888889

LJK312 War Memorial and Village Green Enville Signs say village green is in private 78.6666667 61.9047619 ownership

KAM231 War Memorial, Perton Shopping Centre Perton 100 93.33333333

LJK314 Halfpenny Green 'Green' Bobbington 90 66.66666667

LJK343 Seating Area and associated open space adjacent Pattingham Seating area and associated open 91.6666667 80.95238095 to Village Hall space

LJK347 Seating Area and Parish Notice Board, Burnhill Pattingham Seating and parish notice board 95.3846154 77.77777778 Green

KAM162 Memorial Garden, jnc. Jn. of Jones Lane / Great Wyrley 96.9230769 83.33333333 Walsall Road, Great Wyrley

KAM188 War Memorial / small garden Cheslyn Hay 90.9090909 85.71428571

KAM023 Festival Gardens, Clay Street, Penkridge Penkridge 90.7692308 72.22222222

MJH26 Village Square, Wheaton Aston Wheaton Aston 82.8571429 88.88888889

MJH45 Seating area & garden, Jn. of Bargate and Stafford Brewood 96.9230769 88.88888889 Street, Brewood

MJH44 Seating area & garden, Church Road, Brewood Brewood 93.8461538 91.66666667

MJH52 Seating area & garden, Sandy Lane, Brewood Brewood 91.4285714 83.33333333

MJH56 Grounds to Coven Memorial Hall Coven 95.7142857 46.66

LJK369 Memorial Garden (The Lone Singer) Station Road, Codsall 90.7692308 77.77777778 Codsall

LJK350 Memorial Gardens, off Bakers Way/Church Rd. Codsall 84.2857143 79.16666667 Codsall

LJK366 Seating area. Jn. Bilbrook Road and Pendeford Bilbrook Bench 95.7142857 66.66666667 Mill Lane

LJK365 Village Green, Junc of Lane Green Road and Duck Bilbrook 74.1176471 87.5 Lane

LJK376 Maypole, Windmill Bank Wombourne Wombourne 86.6666667 88.88888889

LJK347 Seating Area and Parish Notice Board, Burnhill Pattingham Seating and parish notice board 95.3846154 77.77777778 Green

AVERAGE 90.652921 79.371896

Site Details – NATURAL AND SEMI-NATURAL: Overall Scores Site ID Site Name Nearest General Site Description Quality Value village

MJH2 Lower Lake Perton 71.4285714 95.2380952 LJK300 Kinver Edge Kinver 94.2857143 100 KAM145 Footpath alongside Pool Hall Lower Penn Canal section, green corridor use 86 93.3333333 fishing pool (The Pool)

KAM110 Fishing Pools, Catsbridge Hatherton Fishing Pools (Catsbridge) 75.7142857 76.1904762 Lane, Four Crosses

HBJ116 Rear of Kingcup Drive, Huntington Access through housing estate 81.6666667 83.3333333 Huntington

KAM150 The Church 'on the common', Coven Heath Farmers Field 76 46.6666667 Coven Heath

KAM096 Cavan's Wood, Huntington Huntington 76.6666667 95.8333333

KAM088 Littleton Leisure Park, Huntington Big hill west of Huntington 86.6666667 80.952381 Cocksparow Lane, Huntington LJK310 Land adjoining Sterrymere Kinver 66 73.3333333 Gardens, Kinver

LJK403 Himley Plantation Wombourne 87.6923077 95.8333333

KAM073 Open Space / Woodland off Essington 72.7272727 87.5 Brownshore Lane, Essington

LJK318 Highgate Common Bobbington 90.6666667 90.4761905

LJK326 Enville Common Enville 70 71.4285714

LJK346 Land adjoining Pattingham Pattingham Land adjoining playing field 74.2857143 80.952381 Playing Field.

KAM048 Lower Belt- A460 (Cannock Featherstone & 46.6666667 80.952381 Road) Shareshill

KAM020 The Swamp, between Grange Penkridge 92.3076923 90.4761905 Rd and St. Michael's Rd, Penkridge KAM016 Between the Canal Wharf Penkridge 78.1818182 88.8888889 and Wolgarston Way

KAM007 off Staffordshire and Penkridge 56.3636364 79.1666667 Worcestershire Canal / Bedingstone Drive HBJ151 Barnfield Sandbeds, Brewood Brewood 90 100

MJH59 The Bront, Coven Coven 70 90.4761905 KAM127 Field - Access off KAM126 Perton 51.6666667 44.4444444 and Dippons Lane, Perton

KAM125 Corser's / Smith's Rough off Perton Woodland 69.0909091 100 Stephenson Drive, Perton

MJH2a The Parkway / St. Andrews Perton Wooded stream 72 90.4761905 Drive

MJH3 Perton Lakeside, Perton Perton 80 100 Centre

LJK368 Oaken Lanes Playing Fields Codsall Parish Council owned fields 78.4615385 91.6666667

MJH1 Bluebell Walk off The Perton Woodland walk on edge of village, 76.25 96.2962963 Parkway formalised paths

KAM089 Shoal Hill Common (1) Huntington Common land supporting woodland heath 85.7142857 92.5925926 and woodland habitats

KAM106 Shoal Hill Common (2) Huntington Mainly wooded site until footpath links to 82.8571429 66.6666667 KAM089. Picnic areas, car parking, litter bins, seating/benches LJK326a The Million Kinver Forestry commission owned woodland 90.9090909 81.4814815

KAM124 Kingswood Common off Perton Mainly wood common land with some 77.3333333 66.6666667 Newport Lane, Kingswood open glades with picnic provision

KAM123 Common Land off Strawmoor Codsall Generally wooded with glades and picnic 72.8571429 59.2592593 Lane, Codsall areas

KAM115 Pendeford Mill Nature Bilbrook Nature reserve providing a variety of 88 95.8333333 Reserve, Bilbrook habitats and features

LJK390 (not in previous Ladywell Wood, Orton Hill Wombourne 68.3333333 70.8333333 audit results despite being in GIS form)

AVERAGE 76.87 83.55

Site Details – GREEN CORRIDORS: Overall Scores Site ID Site Name Nearest village General Site Description Quality Value

KAM144 Staffordshire and Lower Penn / Canal footpath 87.1428571 62.962963 Worcestershire Canal Towpath, Wombourne Lower Penn KAM143 South Staffs Railway Walk Lower Penn / Walk based along disused railway corridor 85 74.0740741 Wombourne

LJK374 South Staffordshire Railway Wombourne Walk based along disused railway corridor 91.4285714 88.8888889 Walk, Wombourne

MJH33 Shropshire Union Canal Towpath Lapley, Stretton, Canal towpath 84 59.2592593 Wheaton Aston

KAM005 Staffordshire and Penkridge 84 55.5555556 Worcestershire Canal Towpath, Penkridge KAM015 Footpath between Templars Penkridge Canal towpath 81.3333333 70.3703704 Way and Filance Bridge

KAM021a Brook footpath, Chestnut Grove, Penkridge Riverside footpath walk 93.75 55.5555556 Penkridge

KAM021 Brook footpath, Chestnut Grove, Penkridge Riverside footpath / walk 92 55.5555556 Penkridge

KAM014 Footpath between Princefield Penkridge 92 59.2592593 Bridge and Templars Way

KAM013 Footpath between Francis Close Penkridge Canal side walk along towpath 85.3333333 66.6666667 and Princefield Bridge

KAM019 Between Boscomoor Lane and Penkridge Footpath along river 84 55.5555556 Vale Gardens

KAM019a Between Boscomoor Lane and Penkridge Footpath along river 85.3333333 55.5555556 Vale Gardens

KAM033 Staffordshire and Acton Trussell Canal side walk 86.1538462 85.1851852 Worcestershire Canal Towpath, Acton Trussell

LJK311 Staffordshire and Kinver Canal side walk, fishing etc. 85 85.1851852 Worcestershire Canal Towpath, Prestwood nr Kinver

LJK304 Staffordshire and Stourton/ Kinver Canal side walk, fishing etc. 88.75 85.1851852 Worcestershire Canal Towpath

LJK319 Staffordshire and Swindon Canal side walk, educational interpretative 98.8235294 92.5925926 Worcestershire Canal Towpath, signage and seating Swindon KAM066 Wyrley and Essington Canal Essington Popular route along disused canal 80 74.0740741 (disused)

KAM068 Wyrley and Essington Canal Essington Popular route along disused canal 78.6666667 74.0740741 (disused)

MJH74 Essington and Wyrley Canal Great Wyrley As MJH73 69.3333333 81.4814815 Walk South

MJH73 Essington and Wyrley Canal Cheslyn Hay Popular walk along canal 70.6666667 81.4814815 Walk North

MJH12a Wom Brook Walk 4 of 5 Brook Wombourne 96.25 85.1851852 Road Giggetty

MJH12 Wom Brook Walk 3 of 5 Wombourne 92.5 85.1851852 Sandringham Drive

MJH11 Wom Brook Walk 2 of 5 Gravel Wombourne 91.7647059 85.1851852 Hill

MJH10 Wom Brook Walk 1 of 5 Rookery Wombourne Linear walk way based along Wom Brook. 88.75 85.1851852 Rd Includes wooded and open areas with a number of access points from built area MJH42 Brewood Visitor Moorings, Brewood Area of moored boats. Key access point to canal 70.7692308 77.7777778 Shropshire Union Canal from Brewood village

AVERAGE 85.7 73.48

Site Details - ALLOTMENTS: Overall Scores Site ID Site Name Nearest village General Site Description Quality Value

KAM147 Boundary Lane Allotments, off Lower Penn 89.23076923 95.2380952 Boundary Way KAM149 Ball Lane Allotments, Coven Coven Heath 93.33333333 95.2380952 Heath LJK334 Allotments, Swindon Road, Swindon 89.09090909 83.3333333 Swindon

PAW001 St Chad's group allotment site Pattingham 89.33333333 95.2380952 KAM178 Pinfold Lane allotments, Cheslyn Hay 89.09090909 71.4285714 Cheslyn Hay KAM017 Francis Green Lane Allotments, Penkridge 82 94.4444444 Penkridge

KAM010 Wolgarston Way Allotments, Penkridge 81.81818182 79.1666667 Penkridge MJH58 Allotments to the rear of Coven 64.44444444 66.6666667 Chambley Green housing, Coven

KAM146 Allotments off Pendleford Mill Bilbrook 86.66666667 70.8333333 Lane, Bilbrook LJK356 Sandy Lane Allotments, Codsall Codsall 76.36363636 70.8333333

LJK357 Watery Lane Allotments, Codsall 91.66666667 87.5 Codsall HBJ330 Greensforge Lane Allotments Kinver 91.66666667 55.5555556

AVERAGE 85.74 80.67

Site Details – HISTORIC PARKS AND Overall GARDENS: Scores Site ID Site Name Nearest village General Site Description Quality Value

KAM196 Moseley Old Hall, Featherstone National trust property - Historic House 100 70.3703704 Fordhouses, Wolverhampton KAM195 Weston Park, Blymhill Historic Hall and Parkland, children's provision 97.6470588 92.5925926 Weston-under-Lizard (adventure playground) miniature railway, open to public at weekends in summer. Hosts V Festival and other events

KAM197 Chillington Hall, Brewood Historic parkland and estate associated with 96.4705882 85.1851852 Codsall Wood Hall. Informal car parks, publicly accessible roads LJK332 Himley Hall Himley Historic Parkland. Links through to Baggeridge 97.6470588 92.5925926 Landscape Park (part Country Park of LP64) LJK333 Baggeridge Country Gospel End Typical example of country park. Comprises 98.8235294 92.5925926 Park (part of LP64) various elements inc. nat/semi-nat and YP&C Provision linked physically to Himley Park and based on historic former use

AVERAGE 98.11 86.66

Appendix 5 – Approach to Catchments and Standards

Typology Catchment-based approach Standard-based approach Other approach Important notes/factors to consider

Allotments Introduce standard and benchmark against carefully chosen comparator authorities Amenity Greenspace Use standard based approach carried forward from previous audit to be applied to new development Play spaces for younger children 924m catchment used to identify areas where new provision MAY be appropriate as informed by officer judgement, population amount in areas not covered, feasibility of delivery etc. Play spaces for older children Use standards identified in the Nortoft work regarding MUGAs and skateparks (i.e. one in each Main Service Village). Outside of these (to recognise demand-led nature of some facilities) rely on demand coming forward from work with the Parish and public through Parish Plans, Site Allocations consultations etc. Churchyards and cemeteries For cemeteries, use previous work done through environmental services to justify existing standard of provision within the District Green corridors 1092m catchment used to identify areas where new provision MAY be appropriate as informed by officer judgement, population amount in areas not covered, feasibility of delivery etc.

Natural and semi-natural 1344m catchment used to identify areas where new provision MAY be appropriate as informed by officer judgement, population amount in areas not covered, feasibility of delivery etc. Parks and gardens We traditionally don’t provide these within the District. Therefore it’s important a clear and convincing argument is put forward in the strategy as to why these aren’t being provided Historic parks and gardens Obviously, we can’t provide these through a standard or catchment based approach, and it is important that we fully explain why in the strategy Civic and heritage spaces Standard based approach where existing standards are checked against comparator authorities before a new standard is arrived at for this plan period (so as to provide new civic spaces as part of new development)

Please note: care must be taken to justify choice of a particular approach in each case. This is only intended to inform analysis of where there are quantitative deficiencies in provision (i.e. where new facilities may be required). Specific improvements to existing sites can be informed by quality/value site surveys alongside consultation responses as informed by officer judgement (specifically landscape and grounds maintenance officers).

Appendix 6 – Open Space Consultation: Parish Council Responses

Open Space Consultation – Parish Council Representations Received

Respondent Responses Bilbrook Parish Council 3 - The Twentyman Playing Field Area is an extremely well-used and visually attractive open space for all age groups.

4 - Local community members have expressed a wish on a number of occasions for the provision of both Tennis Courts and outdoor bowls area to be sited on the Twentyman Playing Fields. There are no other known faculties of this nature available to the public within the village. Friends of Bilbrook are currently looking into funding for a Multi-Use Games Area to be installed on the playing fields.

6b - Village hall Bilbrook Village Hall has looked old and tired for a number of years. The Twentyman Playing Fields Association, management committee of Bilbrook Village Hall, has worked hard over the summer to start the renovation of the Village Hall in order to offer better community facilities to the residents of Bilbrook. The bookings at the Village Hall have looked abysmal over the past few years, mainly because the facilities were so down trodden that no-one would contemplate having a major function, such as a wedding, funeral, birthday party or business function. Village Halls should be at the heart of the community but Bilbrook Village Hall is currently under-used by residents of Bilbrook because of its lacklustre appearance. There is a limit to ‘patching up’ and we are unable to get past the fact that it needs completely refurbishing in order to encourage the residents of Bilbrook to, once again, use Bilbrook Village Hall for any major events that organisations or families wish to hold.

7 - Some of the open spaces would benefit from tree planting, landscaping and path laying to make them more visually attractive to encourage visitors to the area.

Bishops Wood Parish 1 - Area on the corner opposite the village hall, owned by the Housing Association – could have some Council seating or garden for social accessibility. Footpath from phone kiosk to the bottom of Sandy Lane – well used but visually poor and even churned up at times; weeds, dog mess, agricultural debris. Ivetsey Bank Road lacks a footpath from the Old Weston Road / Old Coach Road cross-roads to the north of the village. This prevents community cohesion and is a danger to young children. Football posts to be replaced with mini-soccer posts and ground regarded to level ground from mole hills. Parish Council planning to action.

2 - Wider social use of the Parish Council playing field eg footpath around the edge, seating in corner. Making the area more of a park than a playing field, encouraging more than families visiting the play equipment and children / youths playing football.

3 - Church and churchyard well maintained. Historic – Boscobel House is just outside our village but difficult to reach by walking – no footpath or public right of way exists. If a path could be organised this could be part of a circular walk either down through White Ladies, across to Offoxey Road and back to Bishops Wood or down Foxes Lane round to Kiddemore Green Road and back in to Bishops Wood. Could improve tourism and help local pub.

4 – Allotments. Trim trail or adult play equipment on playing field.

7 - Buy some local land for allotments. Footpaths – many are unsuitable for wheelchair access.

Brewood Parish Council 1 - The Parish Council playing field is undergoing continuous improvement to add facilities, new equipment means it is generally well used except for a very limited skate-park and the open, poorly drained land to the north of the site. A number of footpaths in the area are overgrown and in need of maintenance which may encourage greater use, as would improved publicity of local walks and signage. The Market Place in Brewood is a key attraction but the road surface is in a very poor condition – the Parish Council will pick this up with County

Highways. Open space in Sandy Lane, currently awaiting reinstatement after illegal encroachment by adjacent landowner. Due to the enclosed and overgrown nature of the land (old quarry and subsequent tip?) it will be reinstated to discourage entry. Whether more could be done with this land and at what cost would need further consideration. Stafford Street car park – offers too few parking spaces; 2hr limited parking may help but impact on local employees and traders would need assessing. Poor maintenance of the ‘Crescent’ off Kiddemore Green Road as you leave Brewood heading west. Highways have recently re- surfaced the road. Quality of grass cutting generally can be an issue particularly when blowers are used to clear cuttings into the gutter and drains / gullies later block. Lack of maintenance of road side trees.

2 - Jubilee Hall, Brewood needs more car parking. Church House in Church Road could provide more parking through a joint user agreement. Relocation of the Scout Hut (curr. Off Deansfield Road) to land at Brewood Middle School. Land on Sandy Lane (curr. Drs Surgery) and on The Pavement could provide car parking – both of these are privately owned. Council land in Sandy Lane – amenity are with seating is a pleasant are appreciated in the village; the land ref’d in para 1 above would be costly to cut back to provide angled parking. Parking is regularly reported as an issue in Brewood hence the repeated references – whether this relates to certain times of the day or some drivers choosing to park illegally rather than walking from further away.

3 - The canal system providing local walks, access to beautiful scenery etc. Public footpaths – walking. Two Churchyards providing accessible, open green space in the village. Barnfield Sandbeds.

4 - The Parish Council continues to work with Brewood Bowling club to make land available for a bowling green at the north end of the P. Council’s playing field off Engleton Lane. This land is not ideal due to the poor drainage. Requests received for an adult / older youths exercise equipment facility. One play provider advised against such equipt. being too near younger children’s play equipment – plans to develop such an area have been deferred; other sites to be considered land near new Drs Surgery site for example. Brewood has a many retired and fit adults who may enjoy such equipment, consultation required. Requests have also been received for a swimming pool, sports hall and the supply of more pitches on land (privately owned) adjacent to the BPSA site off Engleton Lane as you leave Brewood.

5 - Brewood already has a village hall (Jubilee Hall) although more land to it would be of use. New Parish Council offices that could further support community use – some local groups currently use the Council Chamber at no charge for committee meetings. Thought also previously given to a heritage centre. Note the request received for a sports hall in para. 5 above.

6a - The village is fairly well served by sporting activities.

6b - Jubilee Hall car parking – adjacent land is owned by the South Staffs Housing Assoc. – joint user agreement?

7 - Requests have been received for allotments. Most requests are met as vacancies arise at this Council’s allotments in Coven (approx 12) and Coven Heath (over 50). Others do not want to travel to an allotment outside the village. Appropriate land (privately owned) may exist off Dirty Lane.

Cheslyn Hay Parish 1 Council  Truck roundabout by Hawkins Drive  Sites where householders have annexed parts of public footpaths  Improvements of the surface and protection of the gates unmade lane from Pinfold Lane to the to gate cemetery and beyond.  Turning circle in Rosemary Road – overgrown  Path bordering quarry – overgrown  Windsor Road island  Bridge railway embankments and paths

 Bottom Bridge Avenue – play area is semi-derelict.

2 - The Parish Council would like to keep any existing open spaces.

3  All open spaces  Recreation grounds  Hatherton Reservoir  Landywood open space  Hornchwood Pool  Bottom of Queen Street (Jean Hawkins House)  Cross Street area (conservation site)  Dundalk cottages  Saredon Road (House past school car park)

4 - Tennis courts and cricket pitches (if demand is required). Have adequate football pitches but need facilities for other sports.

5 - Day time keepfit and zumba classes for both under 50’s and over 50’s. Provision for youth clubs required. Facilities are adequately covered by Cheslyn Hay Village Hall, the schools and Salem Church.

6a - The Parish Council believe that current demand is met.

6b - Hawkins Club – building requires renovation. Cheslyn Hay Village Hall car park – needs improvement as sunken drains and no tarmacing on rear of building.

7 – Cheslyn Hay Sutherland Road Open Space – trees and shrubs poorly maintained often encroaching on footpaths. There are two pools and an open gulley for land drainage that are never maintained properly by Severn Trent. There is no recreational equipment for children – the single goalposts were taken away years ago. Suggestions – Goalpost with metal net, basket ball ring, wooden blocks for steps in ground for under 6’s (fenced off so that dog walkers not affected).

Coven Heath Parish 1 - In Coven Heath we have no public open spaces apart from the allotments car park which is financed Council by Brewood Parish Council. However during the winter months or periods of very wet weather the grass surface becomes water logged and very muddy. Therefore allotment holders are reluctant to park their cars in the car park and use Ball Lane. A hard surface would improve the facility and prevent Ball Lane from being congested. Our only pavements in Ball Lane are pitted and uneven and would benefit from resurfacing. Public Footpath No 39, which runs along Meadow Lane, is full of pot holes which fill with water during rainy periods making it difficult to walk safely.

2 - Cross reference to 1) above, however land would need to be purchased from current landowners to create open spaces which could be available to the village. All residents would benefit from an open space meeting place.

3 - The allotments are well used and of high importance to the village. Canal towpaths, grass verges, footpaths and bridle paths are tended by volunteers during our monthly litter picks. A team of volunteers also cut the verges and patches of grass to aid our entry into ‘The Best Kept Village ‘competition. We also purchased planters and large quantities of summer bedding plants to enhance our surroundings.

4 - Cross reference to 1) above. As there are no open spaces then clearly there is a local need for outdoor sports facilities but possibly outdoor bowls and a multi-use game area would be more fitting than a skatepark as there are only a handful of children/teenagers living in the village.

5 - We have a pressing need for a Village Hall/community centre to host sporting activities/meeting place. Earlier this year a derelict bungalow was demolished. It was situated on land owned by Severn Trent Water who has a water treatment works in Ball Lane, opposite the bungalow site. We believe this site would be a possibility for a community building.

6a - Cross ref 4) above …..because we have no facilities for any type of indoor sporting activity.

6b - Cross ref above 4) and 6).

7 - We believe the answers to previous questions have addressed this question.

Coven Parish Council 1 - ‘The Bront’ off Poplars Farm Way and Moors Drive in Coven, owned by Parish Council. When purchased off SSHA / SSC some years ago edged shale paths crossed this green open space popular with families and dog walkers. The site would be improved with such paths, which are still accessible, being reinstated. One particular area suffers from very poor drainage with a brook near-by and overhanging tree (some of these have been cut back but have provided little improvement). Public footpath off Brewood Road near Grange Farm, across the field to School Lane needs to provide improved accessibility and be defined more clearly.

3 - The Bront (location defined in para 1) – well used by local villagers, wooden adventure trail, walking, summer picnics, dog walking, children also play in the stream that runs along the boundary of the site. Parish Council playing field and football facility at School Lane, Coven – children’s play equipt well used (except skate-park area) although dated and scheduled for replacement after community consultation. Penkside – walking and dog walking.

4 - New skateboard-park required at Coven playing field. Original Parish Council dev’t around 10 years ago provided 3 small skate-parks at three of its four wards – all three were a compromised providing only 2-3 jumps; the supplier went bankrupt before the second piece was fitted at Coven. Redevelopment of this facility, the dated children’s play equipment and what other facilities the site could provide to be the subject of a community consultation in the next few months. Youths currently travel to Wheaton Aston and Penkridge skateboard-parks. Requests received for running track around the field and adult exercise equipment received at the Parish Council’s community drop-in event last year.

6b - As referenced previously, the children’s play equipment at the parish Council playing field off School Lane, Coven is well used (there is nothing else!) but is dated and aimed at younger children. There is nothing for older children / teenagers at the park. Comments about the skateboard-park are reiterated.

7 - As referenced previously, the children’s play equipment at the parish Council playing field off School Lane, Coven is well used (there is nothing else!) but is dated and aimed at younger children. There is nothing for older children / teenagers at the park. Comments about the skateboard-park are reiterated.

Enville Parish Council Himley Parish Council 6 - We have not been asked for any more sporting facilities Outdoor sports facilities - School Road Playing field requires more equipment. There are only swings available. Parish Council is looking for grants for equipment

7 - Himley (including Gospel End): - their open spaces, namely School Road playing field and Baggeridge Country Park, were not even shown on the maps

Huntington Parish 1 Council  Area at the top of Cocksparrow Lane adjoining the A34. Thia was the line of former Cocksparrow

Lane when it was diverted to form a new roundabout on the A34. The land is derelict, overgrown and an eyesore. It is owned by the County Council.  Site on the corner of Lime Pit Lane and A34 on which are a South Staffs water pump building and a gas cabinet. The area is overgrown and unsightly. It was owned by the Coal Authority, present ownership unknown?

2 - The village is well served by open spaces, it is surrounded by the Green Belt and is on the Cannock Chase AONB. What is important is that all existing open spaces owned by the local authorities, Parish Council, District, County and Housing Associations are properly maintained, which in many instances is sadly lacking. The Parish Council takes pride in maintaining it’s open spaces, Littleton Leisure Park, Sports Ground, Community Centre area, and Huntington Village Green. The village green is subject to completion of works by a developer?

4 - The village is reasonably served with sports and leisure facilities, football pitches, Skate Park, Play Area. There is a Rugby Club and a Bowls Club. However there were ambitions for a MUGA on the Sports ground but this may well be a long term objective by the parish council.

5 - There are ambitions for a new Village Hall but adequate funding is curtailing progress. The present Community Centre does not provide any real space for indoor sports activities.

6a - A capacity for indoor sports activities would be welcome but the present restrictions of the Community Centre do not allow the above activities to be carried out?

6b - Note previous comments.

7 - Currently there are four bodies that are responsible for maintaining and looking after public open spaces. The parish council does and is looking after it’s opens spaces to a high standard but the other larger organisation leave a lot to be desired. There are large areas under maintenance contracts to private firms, usually managed by South Staffs Council. i.e. Highway verges- County Council; Estate open spaces – South Staffs Housing Association; other public open spaces - South Staffs Council. The contracts to cut and maintain the above areas are carried out at different periods of times leaving some locations grass cut whilst nearby a patch may have to wait a week or a fortnight to be cut. Why a single contractor cannot cut ALL areas at the same time is beyond belief?

Kinver Parish Council 1 - Brockleys Walk This is owned by District and there has been a programme of improvements in the area in cooperation with Friends of Kinver Open Spaces. Signage, clearing etc. However further improvements are suggested that need to be progressed. -A Health Walk. As the land is flat it is ideal for the pathways to be marked out with distances. To keep it rustic, perhaps small wooden markers would be preferable to writing on the path. -Some low steps for gentle exercise, situated periodically along the walk. Preferably made from wooden logs. -Regular Maintenance is also needed. FKOS have been very frustrated that clearing of the balsam has taken so long. They have needed to ask and remind for work to be done that should be done on a regular and consistent schedule. When this is not done it delays the work that the volunteers can do. Now that the area has started to be improved and sign posted, it is important to maintain the area as user friendly and keep the view of the river clear.

3 - Kinver Edge (NT):Walking, Heritage, Historical and Scientific Interest, Tourism -Numerous footpaths throughout the Parish:well used for a variety of walks in different landsacpes. -The Rock Houses: Heritage, Educational for use by schools, Tourism -Canal Conservation Area :Green Corridor for walking, boating, tourism and wild life habitat. -River Stour: pleasant vista -High Street Conservation Area : Heritage Historical buildings, shopping, restaurants etc.. tourism -St Peter’s Church : Heritage building

4 - Local residents are not able to use the facilities at Edgcliff School as in the past. There is a need for a multi games area. There is no outdoor facility for tennis, hand ball, netball etc. There is a lot of ASB in the area by the playing fields which could be alleviated to some degree by this kind of facility. The bike track and skate park are well used, as is the Play Area for younger children. New outdoor gym equipment has also recently been installed. A MUGA area would fill a gap for informal ball games that are not facilitated at the moment.

5 - No… better use is needed of existing… see below

6a - The Methodist Hall provides weekly classes for Martial Arts andTai Chi and a play school There are no sporting activities at the Church Hall. The main hall is Kinver Sports and Community Centre (KSCA) by the Playing fields. This is an old building which is under used, and apart from Indoor Bowls for the senior citizens, it is not set up for indoor sports. Multi games area for tennis, 5 aside football, softball, basket ball etc is needed. Provision for a boxing club,(which used to be at the school),table tennis, pool etc This would cater for the youth of the village and reduce the ASB previously mentioned. A road cycling track round the outside of the field has been suggested as road cycling is a growing activity. All of the above would increase the opportunity for residents to become more active, and improve health.

6b - As mentioned above, The KSCA is an old building and requires reassessment to improve it to meet current needs. This would encourage more use and serve the whole of the community. The present layout is restrictive and cannot cater for all the facilities for sport, youth club etc that community centres should be used for. There are no indoor facilities for the youth in the winter, which leads to ASB. By tackling the lack of suitable activities in the building, the benefits to the community would be high… encouraging residents to exercise more and give younger people something to do and somewhere to meet. It is not an easy task as it will require a lot of money, time, commitment and volunteers. And as much support from the local authority as possible.

Lower Penn Parish 3 - Castle croft open space : public accesss and openness Council -Old railway now South Staffordshire walk : Important for public access and links to other areas

4 - There has not been any requests made. Siting would be difficult to ensure it would benefit the whole village as Lower Penn is so fragmented.

6a - The ability to access outside facilities has reduced the demand on the use of the village hall for such activities

7 - Open space is regarded as being of great importance. The costs of maintenance is of concern to the Parish Council. The return of this questionnaire has been made by the Chairman of Lower Penn Parish Council. Councillor Robert Reade

Penkridge Parish 1 - Otherton Brook The ‘green corridor’ needs improvement with work on the paths, brook, planting Council and seating. The area has a poor visual appearance since the development of Pencric. All of the green space in this area needs protecting. Too much has been lost already. The area is important for the large estates, and provided a valuable easily accessed walkway. This was particularly useful for the disabled and elderly. -Canal Towpaths An important feature of the village needing enhancement and improved access. Provide leisure walks and a cycle route. Improvements are needed towards Otherton. -Wolgarston Way This green space creates a ‘buffer’ with the M6. It is well used and needs protecting. Paths need extending to meet the play area, and signage needs improving. -The Swamp has recently been improved, but must be protected as a natural area. -Monckton Centre and Leisure Centre Facilities at both need improving so that there is wider use, especially as the population is set to increase. Eg cycle track, running track, athletics

2 - Northern end of village has no open space or play areas to serve this development. -New development at Lyne Hill will require allotments, play areas, open spaces. -Riverside Park (opposite Marshbrook School) is identified in the Local Plan. It could provide wildlife areas, recreational areas, riverside walks, cycle routes.

-Opportunities for children’s play could be extended and improved across the village. -Walking and cycle routes to Stafford, around the village, and to Huntingdon along the Mineral Railway need development.

3 - School Playing Fields must be protected and community use increased. -Market Site must be retained as an important feature. It brings increased visitors and trade, and also provides an important local facility. -River Penk Area Meadow opposite the market is visually attractive plus the landmarks of Cuttlestone Bridge and Seven Arches Bridge. The River Penk and surrounding meadows create a vital environmental feature of the village. -Horsefair is a valuable central play area as well as being an historical feature. -The Haling Dene grounds form a valuable park and arboretum around the community centre. -The Jubilee Gardens and Bowling Green provide a green space in the village centre and afford a view of St Michael’s Church. (P.P.C. would welcome an opportunity to extend if neighbouring business premises became vacant) -The Church and Burial Grounds plus the original Stone Cross are important to maintain.

4 - The Monckton Recreation Centre needs to be improved and extended. Suggestions include family fitness opportunities, health walk, play provision, skatepark (existing equipment has a short life) The Leisure Centre could possibly have the facilities extended to meet the demands of the growing village. Athletics opportunities are needed at a village location. Bowling Club is popular and at capacity. The Swimming Pool is small and very busy.

5 - There is a need to make some sort of provision in the south of the village where new development will take place. Councillors are concerned that there are no specific youth facilities. Provision may reduce anti- social behaviour. Youth/Community/Social Club. Perhaps providing indoor sports – basketball, badminton, pool, skittles etc

6b - Monckton Centre – visual impact needs improvement. Community use of school sports halls and playing fields needs increasing.

7 - Railway Station. Cherrybrook and Vale Gardens Quarry (former play areas) are important open spaces and need protecting and made more attractive. Open Space on Templars Way is a valuable green area and needs retaining. Green belt land (New Acre Stables) is at the southern gateway to the village. It is temporarily occupied by travellers and needs restoring as soon as possible. Areas of open countryside need retaining around the village boundary to retain the village identity and avoid urban sprawl.

Perton Parish Council There is a large and expanding need for Allotment Gardens and therefore request that this requirement be given high priority in the needs analysis.

Swindon Parish Council The following open spaces are thought to be important to our community, Playing fields as host activities for all ages & are used by all ages, the churchyard, Canal towpaths for walking & cycling & for its historic vale, Greensforge, roman fort & road.

New outdoor sports facilities would be tennis courts on the bottom field of the Hinksford Lane playing fields. These would improve fitness as the activity is for the young & old. It would enhance the current cricket & bowls facilities & also have a social aspect for the village.

Requiring improvements, is the cricket club pavilion as it is now 30 years old. Again this could grow

membership, encouraging more to do sport.

Trysull and Seisdon Parish Council

Unknown Parish Council 1 – No all our open spaces are maintained by the Parish Council Grounds Men.

4 – The Parish Council is currently engaged in the provision of a new skatepark.

Wombourne Parish 1 - Land adjoining Brickbridge Playing Fields. This area was programmed for improvement by South Council Staffordshire Council but ownership was in dispute. The planned improvements would be welcomed by this Parish Council.

2 - There is some demand for allotments although suitable land is not currently available.

3 - Railway Walk and Wombrook Walk: visually attractive and away from traffic.

Village centre sports and social grounds and club house present the illusion of a public village green.

N.B. The cricket pitch is barely large enough to qualify for inter-club matches. A separate larger site would present difficulties unless big enough to accommodate the other sports greens/courts which exist.

4 - Skate Park: A search for an acceptable site is ongoing. This is a popular pastime as shown at neighbouring sites.

5 - No. Currently available: Civic Centre – 2 halls, Council Chamber etc. Community Centre – 3 rooms Village Hall (W.I); Hallam Hall (Guides); Mill Lane Hut (Scouts); Allen Memorial Hall; The Venerable Bede; St. Benedict Biscop Church; Common Road Methodist Church; Roman Catholic Church; Kingsway Church; Public Houses and Clubs

6b - Generally good and well used. There is some competition for small meeting rooms at a low (nil) charge, with clashes of popular dates occurring. A public list of availabilities may be useful.

Appendix 7 – Open Space Consultation: Other Responses

Open Space Consultation – Other Representations Received

Respondent Responses Canal River Trust 1 – Which village or local community are you making your comments on?

The canals have been included under the ‘green corridor’ type of open space. The canal networks provide green corridors, however, it is important to highlight that the canal networks are multi- functional and should not be viewed purely as green infrastructure. Apart from their traditional role as a system of travel or transport they serve in a variety of roles, including: an agent of or catalyst for regeneration; a contributor to water supply and transfer, drainage and flood management; a tourism, cultural, sport, leisure and recreation resource; a heritage landscape, open space and ecological resource; sustainable modes of transport; and routes for telecommunication.

Bilbrook - the Shropshire Union Canal runs adjacent to the development boundary, but the Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal has not been identified as running through the development boundary around the i54 site.

Brewood - the Shropshire Union Canal runs adjacent to the development boundary

Coven – the Staffordshire and Worcester Canal runs adjacent to and through the development boundary.

Kinver - the Staffordshire and Worcester Canal runs adjacent to the development boundary.

Penkridge - the Staffordshire and Worcester Canal runs through the development boundary.

Swindon - the Staffordshire and Worcester Canal runs through the development boundary.

Wheaton Aston – the Shropshire Union Canal runs adjacent to the development boundary.

Wombourne - the Staffordshire and Worcester Canal runs through the development boundary.

4 - What is your view on the quality of these open spaces and how they are maintained?

We are the charity entrusted with the care of 2,000 miles of waterways in England and Wales. We manage our canals and rivers as one network with common policies across England and Wales. We do this because we need to allocate resource where it is most needed and to be as efficient and effective as we can. Our income will come from a wide range of sources – from individual donors and boat licence sales through to corporate sponsors and tenants of our properties to significant business partnerships and our vital contract with government.

Cannock Chase Council -The document contains a map of Cannock Chase AONB which describes it as an extensive open space for residents. While Cannock Chase provides a large extensive area of natural open space that is accessible to local residents to undertake recreational activities, it is important that these activities are carefully managed in order to prevent damage to this important natural asset. Your Open Space work will be important in identifying and managing the quality of alternative areas of Open Space that can be used by local people to reduce the impact of recreation on Cannock Chase AONB. -The map of Huntington shows areas of Natural and semi-natural Greenspace adjacent to Cannock. These areas between Huntington and Cannock provide informal recreational areas within the urban area, and provide green links between housing estates as well as reducing pressure on Cannock Chase AONB. This is also important given the planned Strategic Housing site just to the north east at Land West of Pye Green Road for over 700 houses.

Environment Agency The Environment Agency has a remit to protect and manage the natural water environment, and we are therefore keen to input into any site allocation that has a river or other watercourse flowing through. Any such watercourse should be adequately protected and enhanced through the provision and maintenance of an unobstructed natural corridor. This should provide for water-based habitats and for flood risk management.

We have a list of potential flood alleviation schemes drawn up that are waiting for funding to trigger construction. Two of these sites are in Perton and Kinver. In light of this, we request that when the Open Spaces Allocations are drafted, consideration is given to allocating such land which may be vital for the reduction of risk to local communities and may also provide wider multifunctional benefits.

The Friends of Bilbrook I am a member of ‘The Friends of Bilbrook’ voluntary group and have been working on a project to install a Multi Use Games Area on Joey’s Lane playing Fields. This would be on the site of a dilapidated basketball court. We have been working on this for a year gaining views of local children, carrying out a whole village consultation, getting quotes and gaining permission from the Parish Council. We have been applying for funding and have been turned down by many organisations such as Sport England, Wolves Community Fund and the People’s Millions. We have just been granted £2,453.50 from the District Council Community Budget, which is a wonderful start towards our £46,000 goal.

However, I notice Multi Use Games Areas are listed below as part of the consultation, and we received over 200 responses in our consultation in favour of a MUGA on the playing fields. We would welcome any support or influence that you could give us that would help in our and your aim to improve open spaces.

Inland Waterways The Inland Waterways Association (IWA) is a national charity which campaigns for the conservation, Association use, maintenance, restoration and development of the inland waterways for public benefit.

Our particular interest in this consultation is in canals and canal towpaths forming part of the Green Corridors category.

The canals in South Staffordshire are historic waterways and valuable amenity and recreational corridors, providing leisure boating, walking, angling, cycling and nature conservation benefits to the area.

We note that the currently navigable canals (Staffordshire & Worcestershire Canal and Shropshire Union Canal) are shown as Green Corridors on the Open Space Maps, along with the Wyrley Branch Canal which is now maintained as a nature reserve. However, it is not clear if the Hatherton Branch Canal is included.

The Hatherton Canal at Calf Heath is still navigable, although not publicly accessible, but from the M6 east to Wedges Mills the towpath is still owned by the Canal & River Trust and maintained by volunteers from the Lichfield & Hatherton Canals Restoration Trust and should be included as a Green Corridor.

Although well used locally and maintained to a basic standard, the Hatherton Canal towpath would benefit from investment to improve its condition to at least match that of other sections of towpaths. CRT has only limited funding for towpaths which provide benefits to local people but generate no income for them. Therefore, any financial assistance that the Council can provide would enable improvements to be made and also free up volunteer time to progress their wider objectives of restoring the canal to navigable standard.

Mr and Mrs Hunter We have already experienced a mini town at Turnberry Estate and this has severely added to the already congested A34. Most times it can take ten minutes to get out of our drive.

The M6 Toll has already added to severe congestion and pollution and has taken precious green belt away.

There is very little green belt surrounding Great Wyrley and Cheslyn Hay. Surely affordable housing should be located on existing derelict areas.

We fully understand the need of affordable housing but to what environmental and pollution cost.

Lichfield & Hatherton 1 - The Trust was created to work for the reopening of two links between existing canals in Canals Restoration Trust Staffordshire and the “Black Country”, specifically the network known as the northern Birmingham (LHCRT) Canal Navigations in Walsall Metropolitan Borough. One of these links, known as the Hatherton Canal, will restore the connection between Calf Heath on the Staffordshire & Worcestershire (S & W) Canal and the Wyrley & Essington Canal. Most of this 7-mile link lies within the SSDC’s boundaries. (Short sections between Wedges Lane (A4601) and the Churchbridge area are on the border between SSDC and Cannock Chase Council, the canal being mostly in the latter; and the final section near Bloxwich lies within Walsall MB).

2 - Once completed, the canal will provide a continuous green corridor along its length, consisting not only of the water itself with associated vegetation, but also a “towpath” for the use of walkers, joggers, cyclists and anglers, with hedges to separate it from the adjacent land. This corridor will provide a haven for flora and fauna, as on the existing substantial lengths of the S &W Canal within the Council’s area.

3 - Many of the boaters using the restored canal will come from other parts of the country (and thus benefit the area as visitors who will be spending money here). But far more of those using canals these days do so on land rather than afloat – the walkers etc mentioned above. Surveys commonly report that around 3% of canal users are boaters, the remaining 97% being those walkers etc. Few of these will be venturing far from home, and most will thus be residents of SSDC.

4 - The contribution to the health and wellbeing of local residents from restoration of the canal creating additional open space accessible to the public is thus evident. It is very much to their advantage that the Council is safeguarding the proposed route in the Local Plan. We therefore urge the Council to recognise in their Open Space policy the line of the Hatherton Canal as a green corridor, on the same basis as the existing S & W Canal, for the benefits it will bring.

Sandra Davis There did not appear to be any boxes to make any comments about open spaces. I would therefore like to add that in Codsall we have little to no facilities for elderly people, e.g. a bowling green.

I would like to enquire as to who owns the triangle of land between the old and new Bilbrook Road by the High School? This would seem an ideal area for a bowling green with access from the old Bilbrook Road, nice high edges, space for a car park and small clubhouse and away from houses, so causing little disruption. Also it would be close to the leisure centre, making it part of a leisure hub for the village.

Natural England Open space

Natural England believes that everyone should have access to good quality natural greenspace near to where they live. We have developed our Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards (ANGSt) to assist with this. ANGSt recommends that everyone, wherever they live, should have accessible natural greenspace: -of at least 2 hectares in size, no more than 300 metres (5 minutes walk) from home; -at least one accessible 20 hectare site within two kilometre of home; -one accessible 100 hectare site within five kilometres of home; and

-one accessible 500 hectare site within ten kilometres of home; plus -a minimum of one hectare of statutory Local Nature Reserves per thousand population.

ANGSt was developed in the early 1990’s and was based on research into minimum distances people would travel to the natural environment. Natural England reviewed the standard in 2008 and concluded that it was still useful but that further guidance was required to explain how it should be applied. Our report Nature Nearby, published in 2010 provides this additional clarity and can be found here http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/40004. The guidance in Nature Nearby is aimed at parks and greenspace practitioners and their partners, particularly decision makers, planners and managers of green space. It describes the amount, quality and visitor services of accessible natural green spaces that we believe everyone is entitled to, and provides advice on how they can be delivered. We believe it may be of interest to the LPA when considering open space provision through the Site Allocations part of your Local Plan.

Green Infrastructure Open space can play an important role in the local green infrastructure (GI) network. The LPA should consider the multifunctionality and connectivity of its open spaces, as this is an important part of understanding their true value. The CABE Space Guidance ‘Start with the Park’ (2005) outlines the importance of planning around green spaces, with consideration being given to the context of local landscape character and contribution to the wider GI network. The provision of new GI should be considered at an early stage to ensure it is deliverable at plan stage.

Biodiversity Biodiversity is a core component of sustainable development, underpinning economic development, and has an important role to play in developing locally distinctive and sustainable communities. We therefore advise that the biodiversity value of open spaces is taken into consideration. The Local Authority may find the Nature on the Map website useful to source information on conservation sites and important habitats. Further information about Biodiversity in the UK is available on the JNCC website, including details relating to UK BAP priority species and habitats. Natural England does not hold protected species records and therefore cannot advise as to the likelihood of their presence on open space. Information on non-statutory sites and species records may be obtained from your Local Records Centre and such information should be considered when assessing sites for housing development.

Geodiversity Planning policies should take a strategic approach to the conservation, enhancement and restoration of geodiversity, and promote opportunities for the incorporation of geodiversity interest as part of development. We advise that the geodiversity value of open spaces is taken into consideration. Local authorities should ensure that appropriate weight is attached to the geodiversity interest of designated sites and also within the wider environment, and maximise opportunities to include geodiversity in and around developments as part of the design process. Further information on geodiversity is available on Natural England’s website.

Landscape Character We advise that the landscape value of open spaces is taken into account. A landscape character approach should be used to underpin and guide decisions on development and set out criteria based policies for landscape character areas. New development should build-in and ensure that consideration is given to the wider landscape based on landscape assessment.

Open space enhancement South Staffordshire Borough Council is a member of the Cannock Chase SAC Partnership. Research indicates that visitors are having an adverse impact on Cannock Chase SAC, and that further

development in proximity to the SAC could result in adverse effects on the integrity of this site. The SAC Partnership is in the process of devising a comprehensive mitigation plan. Local open space provision is highly relevant to this. Mitigation could involve the delivery of strategic areas of open space, referred to as Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANGS). The current SANGS quality guidance has been provided for your information, as an annex to this letter. We would recommend that this guidance is considered when creating any new spaces.

Network Rail Network Rail would request that no walking route, riding routes, cycling routes or interconnecting routes include Network Rail land or cross over the railway and that no Network Rail land should form part of any open spaces as per the list from the council.

South Staffs Council should also be made aware that where public open spaces are allocated adjacent to the railway line, that suitable trespass proof fencing (minimum 1.8m-2m high steel palisade is preferred) is erected adjacent to the operational railway / Network Rail land. Any existing Network Rail fencing at the site has been erected to take account of the risk posed at the time the fencing was erected and not to take into account any presumed future use of the site, where increased numbers of people including minors may be using the public space area during daytime, evening or nightime. Therefore, any proposed open space imports a risk of trespass onto the operational railway, which we would remind the council, is a criminal offence (s55 British Transport Commission Act 1949). As the applicant has chosen to develop a proposal next to the operational railway they are requested to provide a suitable trespass proof fence to mitigate any risks they will import. As Network Rail is a publicly funded organisation with a regulated remit it would not be reasonable to require Network Rail to fund boundary works and enhancements necessitated by third party open space development. The maximum fine if you are caught trespassing or vandalising the railway is £1000; however, it can also lead to serious injury or death. Most of the trespassing and vandalism incidents on our railway are committed by boys aged eight to16 years but in the past, children as young as five years old have been found playing on the tracks. Adults who use the railway as a shortcut are another group who are likely to risk their lives. Even after it has put its brakes on a train travels about 2000 metres or the length of 20 Premier League football pitches before stopping.

Ancer Spa Thank you for your letter concerning the above. We act for the LW Voluntary Settlement who own (on behalf of LW land in and around Perton. Please find attached as Appendix 1 -a plan that shows the two principle Voluntary Settlement) land ownerships: -Land to the south of Perton (edged red) that on behalf of our clients we are promoting through the SSDC SHLAA and Site Allocations process for a residential-led mixed use development. -Land to the north of Perton, (edged blue) that is shown on the SSDC Perton Open Space map as ‘natural and semi natural green space’. Apart from a bridleway running through this site it has no public access rights. In January of this year the northern part of this site was granted permission for change of use to a natural burial ground.

1. Our representations on the Open Spaces consultation exercise do not fit readily into the SSDC questionnaire so we set them out in this letter.

2. From our high level survey of Perton and a study of SSDC’s own Perton Open Space map we note that in the area there is a shortage of: -Cemetery facilities -Allotments -Children’s and young people’s play areas -Green corridors -Natural and semi natural green space with public access -Outdoor sports facilities and playing fields. -Youth Club facilities.

3. We have previously submitted as part of the SSDC SHLAA and Site allocation process, representations in regard to the ‘red land’ to the south of Perton. In those representations we have put forward the case that part of the land is suitable for a residential-led mixed-use development that can address some of the deficiencies in Perton’s Open Space. We attach as Appendix 2 a concept diagram that shows how the site could be developed.

4. Our clients have a long historical connection to the area – 900 years. As part of the evolution of their proposals for the scheme to the south of Perton they have asked us to ensure that, as part of the family’s legacy, if any new development were to take place on their land then it should address amongst other things shortages in public open space.

5. Accordingly the following has happened or is planned for: -Cemetery facilities. Permission has now been granted for the new natural burial ground in the northern part of the ‘blue land’. Work has commenced in order to start on site in 2014. These include planning for the repairs to the Wergs Road wall that forms the northern boundary of the site. -Allotments. The new development proposals for the land south of Perton include some 1.87 ha / 4.61 acres of new public allotments. -Children’s and young people’s play areas. The new development proposals for the land south of Perton include for a number of new play areas set within the proposed public open space. -Green corridors. The proposals as can be seen in Appendix 2, include new green corridors and footpath / cycle ways linking the scheme into the village and a new right of way to the south. -Natural and semi-natural green space with public access. My client, as part of a package of planning gain, is keen to discuss with SSDC the possibility of the southern part of the ‘blue land’ being dedicated as public open space. -Outdoor sports facilities and playing fields. The scheme shows some 2.2 ha /5.5 acres of new open space and playing fields. -In the past we have had discussions with local elected representatives about the lack of youth club facilities in the village. There is plenty of room within the development site to accommodate a purpose built facility or alternatively a contribution could be made towards converting existing community space in the village centre into a youth club. -In total, the new ‘green areas’ for the land south of Perton amount to some 10.17 ha / 25.14 acres. (Excluding any arrangement on the blue land.)

6. It is our view that when considering the future open space provision in Perton, which is deficient in some areas, the potential offered by my client’s site to address these shortfalls is relevant to SSDC’s decision making process.

Bevan Craddock 1. Conserve and protect the following sites in the Parish of Penkridge

Newlands Wood – owned and managed by the Forestry Commission – with its rare birds and other wildlife – this is a Public Open Access site.

The area known as “The Swamp”, an area of Open Space and wildlife interest owned by SSDC, with its important pond life, birds, bats , insects and plant life.

The area known as “Bickford Meadows”, originally designated as a Staffs Wildlife Trust areas, because of its importance as a wetland habitat in this areas and its associated wildlife.

The whole of the River Penk Meadows within the boundaries of Penkridge Parish – and important flood plain and which has great potential as a wetland habitat. Intensive Agriculture around Penkridge and throughout our parish has destroyed much wildlife. We are left with the river meadows which are no longer flower meadows. The stretch from Cuttlestone Bridge to M6 needs improving and a plan could be prepared to make it a much needed open space with access paths, cycle paths and pools and ponds and planting to make it a rich are used by people and wildlife.

Gailey Pools and surrounding habitat owned but he Canal and Waterways Trust – which contains an historically important heronry, is one of the most important sites for bats in this area, and is being managed by the Trust as an important habitat for wildlife, particularly for its birds and bats.

All other woodlands (deciduous and coniferous) within the Parish of Penkridge.

2. Conserve and create Flower-rich meadows – I have seen many rich meadows destroyed in the last 50 years throughout much of Staffordshire, and particularly in South Staffordshire. Much od this was carried our by the landowners or tenant farmers even though their attention was drawn to the species they were going to destroy. I, together with a Ministry of Agriculture senior employee, tried to prevent a farmer from ploughing up acres of herb rich meadows containing orchids but to no avail. Our Parish, with the River Penk and its tributary streams flowing through it, was once a very rich habitat for lowland plants, with its associated bird and insect species. It is imperative that we try and redress these very bad decisions made in the past. Our meadows along the River Penk used to be rich in wildlife and could be again. They could also become amenity areas which the public could enjoy and walk through.

3. Community Needs

In the 50 years I have lived in Penkridge I have seen it grow from a small village to a town, the urban areas now covering much more land than it did in 1963. Our facilities have however not increased in proportion to our population, apart from schools and the number of car owners.

a) We now desperately need more allotment land so that our community can grow more of their own food and become more sustainable. The Parish Council have provided two small are but with the proposed new housing we will need at least another 200 plots as a much greater percentage of residents now with to grow some of their own food. In fact, I would propose that there is now scope for a large Co-operative Allotment Site where many people can all share in the fruits of their joint labour. All new housing development should take account of this and where, for instance, 50 homes are built, an area for allotments should be set aside near to where they live. b) There is also an urgent need for more car parking including off road safe parking adjacent to homes. c) The Staffordshire and Worcestershire Canal is an important feature (and heritage) of our Parish of Penkridge. By walking and travelling by boat or by bicycle, members of our community can safely travel as far afield as Cities and Towns many miles away. They can also reach local places like Acton Trussell and Stafford to the north and Coven and Wolverhampton to the south. Within our community of Penkridge, the Canal could me made much more accessible as a safe, quick route for many of our population, young and old, to travel on foot and by cycle to shops, all schools Rodbaston College, as well as offering a quiet, safe place to simply walk to some of the Open Spaces situated near to the Canal.

4. I submit “That any land in our community being considered for including in the Site Allocation for the Local Plan, even on land which appears to not have any interest, should be subject to a full independent ecological assessment.”

5. Land for an additional Bowling Green should identified in the Parish e.g. Mockton Recreation Centre, land on the northern edge of Penkridge, or near to the proposed Lyne Hill housing.

6. Village Greens/Open Space/Amenity Areas – Areas that should be considered are: -The Penk Meadows (part of which the Parish Council have Planning Permission for Park and Wildlife). -The Otherton Brook areas between Wolgarston Way and New Road (which is being encroached on with the recent Planning Permission for the Care Home) and become a Village Green. -Cuttlestone Bridge to Bull Bridge, including Seven Arches and meadow on north side of River, could

be a Village Green. -All Parish Council owned and managed land (Play Areas as well as the Amenity land that they own either side the brook to the north of and adjacent to Princefield school) should be conserved. -Over the years we have lost large areas with in-fill development (e.g. between Market Street and A449). New open space areas are needed urgently. The Lyne Hill development has not set aside enough open space or allotments. Gardens will be very small and there could be problems with car parking from the start.

Paul Higgs While searching on the internet earlier I came across this link saying that you were seeking views on allotment in order to help write a strategy. I would want you to know that allotments provide a genuine community element and that I would hope the council strategy will reflect this. I stress, however the need for allotments to be locally run and to have reasonable twenty first century facilities) especially on-site toilets).

RPS Planning and RPS Planning and Development acts on behalf of Persimmon Homes in relation to its land and Development (on behalf development interests at Featherstone. Accordingly please find below a response to the open space of Persimmon Homes) strategy in respect of Featherstone’s open space requirements and how this need can be satisfied through the development proposed at Brookhouse Lane.

Playing Fields and Changing Rooms

Since 2005 Featherstone Parish Council has identified to RPS that the village is in need of a village playing field and specifically the requirement for a football pitch. Alongside this provision and the intended football use, it was recognised that a changing room would facilitate the use of the pitch for organised matches and training use of the pitch by local teams. A such the residential development of 60 dwellings at land off Brookhouse Lane will deliver the football pitch and changing room facility, as identified on the plan enclosed.

The site off Brookhouse Lane is considered appropriate for the location of the village playing field due to its close relationship to the school, to facilitate dual use of the facility, as well as the linkages that are able to be provided to the main village through pedestrian footpaths along the northern boundary of the field and footbridges across the brook to facilitate these sustainable links. However as visiting teams and other players outside of the village are likely to require vehicular access to the playing field, a road from Brookhouse Land and car park will be provided to ensure that access for all modes of transport are provided.

Skate Ramp Facility

More recent discussions with Featherstone Parish Council have also identified the aim to make provision for junior and teenage play through the delivery of a skateboard/bmx ramp facility. As there is sufficient room to accommodate such a facility alongside the proposed playing field, an area has been identified for such us as shown on the attached plan. This location is considered to be suitable for the ramp facility as it is away from existing and proposed residential swellings to avoid nuisance factors whilst being close to the football pitch and changing rooms that will offer surveillance of the facility. The ramp will be as equally accessible to the village as the playing field and within a distance from the village that is suitable for older children and teenagers to visit.

Green Corridor

The northern boundary of the field off Brookhouse Lane is identified by a small watercourse or brook. To facilitate linkages between the proposed residential development and the existing village as well as providing pedestrian routes to the new playing field facilities, it is proposed to provide a pedestrian footpath along this boundary in a green corridor link. This new area of public open space will be

sensitively landscaped with native tree and hedge planting to soften views of the new development and changing room building. It will also act as a new naturalised area of public open space that will offer a footpath along its length with formal bridged connections to the main village.

The proposed green corridor and footpath will provide a link south to White Houses Lane which could provide access to Whitgreaves Wood and Moseley Old Hall, which has been recognised as providing the only formal gardens to the village. Therefore the proposed Green Corridor will facilitate access to existing woodland natural spaces and formal gardens.

Play Area

The proposed residential development will also contribute a children’s play area. The existing play area at Featherstone is located toward the north of the village and therefore the proposed development and the southern areas of the village would benefit from provision of a new play area. Whether such a facility would be located alongside the housing development proposed or be part of the playing field dacilities to be provided, has not been determined or discussed with the Parish Council as yet.

I trust that this representation will facilitate your consideration of Featherstone’s open space requirements and also identify a solution to meeting the village’s current under provision of formal and informal public open space. The 60 dwellings that will deliver these facilities are proposed to be delivered within the next 5 years to fulfil the village’s housing and open space requirements and be justified through accordance with Core Strategy Policies: 6 Housing Delivery, 10 Sustainable Community Facilities and 14 Open Space Sport and Recreation.

The Coal Authority I can confirm that the Coal Authority has no specific comments or observations to make at this stage.

Wild About Perton Perton’s Open Spaces People in Perton use open space in a wide variety of ways:  to meet and chat with friends  to use play equipment and play games  to walk the dog  to appreciate and learn about the wildlife and environment  to walk or cycle to and from the shops and/or school.

Perton’s open spaces can be characterised into three green-space communities, which include some of types of open space referred to in the consultation:

 Lower park area comprising amenity green-space near the village centre, including children’s playground, MUGA court and fitness area, the Upper Lake, Lower Lake, Bluebell Wood, the connecting footpaths and cycle paths, the land bordering the River Penk linking the Lakes and the semi-natural woodland, and the open land beyond bordering Smith’s Rough. This large lower park large area has many of the constituents found in a traditional town park but without any real sense of unifying identity.

 Upper park area comprising amenity green-space alongside the boundary with Wolverhampton including playing fields, semi-natural woodland and open space, historic green lane known as Dippons Lane, small community orchard and the semi-natural section of the River Penk: This large upper park area compliments many of the green-space amenities of the lower park area but similarly lacks a sense of unifying identity.

 Amenity Green-space and Footpaths: In addition there are many important small and medium areas of amenity green-space and an extensive network of public footpaths, in amongst the

houses, throughout Perton.

Perton’s open spaces are extensive compared to some other villages and communities in South Staffordshire. Wild About Perton has supported South Staffordshire Council’s management of these diverse amenities which constitute Perton’s green-space, particularly its management of green-space for bio-diversity and the management of Canada Geese. The management of the green-space for biodiversity has been successful with an increase in the range of wildlife that is now supported. Similarly the measures taken to manage the numbers of Canada Geese have been successful.

Wild About Perton has observed that managing Perton’s green-space for a diverse range of uses, for people from all age groups, in a time of varying weather conditions and declining local authority budgets, is not without its challenges. Often people are heard to complain without understanding the difficulties faced.

Some thoughts on how Perton’s open space might be better managed Despite the challenges inherent in the management Perton’s green-space, Wild About Perton feels that there scope for improvements and recommends that:

 More publically available information should be provided about the way Perton’s open space is managed i.e. the differing roles and responsibilities of the Council and its contractors, with a problem hotline/contact point. It is suggested that this information should be communicated via all the usual outlets but also include: local social media; noticeboards and regular public briefings. A recent concern about the management of public footpaths voiced by numerous people in the pages of local social media was never satisfactorily answered, but so easily could have been.

 Designate the two large areas of amenity green-space in Perton as village parks with a clear sense of linked local identity i.e. designate the upper park area and the local park area referred to above; Upper Perton Park and Lower Perton Park. In addition a village parks management plan should be developed involving local community interests, i.e. park users, community organisations, and district and parish councils.

 Foster the involvement and engagement of park users; commercial, public and community organisations, in an Perton green-space improvement programme:  to promote wider public knowledge and information about how Perton’s green-space is managed and the differing roles and responsibilities of the Council, its contractors and the local community.  to actively promote an adoptions and sponsorship programme engaging a wide range of individuals, and public and commercial organisations in, e.g., the adoption and/or sponsorship of public seats, public gardens and other amenity initiatives.  to inform and support the development of management plans for Perton’s village parks.  to support work in the medium term towards applications for green flag/pennant status linked to areas within the village parks. Specific areas which might make suitable applications in the medium term include: Bluebell Walk, Upper Lake, and the section of the upper park area of woodland, Dippons Lane and upper River Penk.

Wild About Perton Summary of evidence submitted; A table of information is offered as part of the consultation response, containing quantifiable information about the use of Perton’s open spaces in relation to activities organised by Wild About Perton (2006 -2013). This covers a range of information regarding open spaces, identifying level and type of use, attendance, access/mobility issues and funding mechanisms for public events using various open spaces within Perton.

Friends of Bilbrook Summary of evidence submitted; Friends of Bilbrook submitted data from a previous consultation carried out in January/February 2012 as part of a project to install a Multi Use Games Area on Joey’s Lane Playing Fields.

This involved a questionnaire delivered to every house in Bilbrook via the Village News publication, and included the design of the facility was subject to the views of local schools and youth organisations which were fed into the design of the facility. This resulted in floodlighting and the table tennis table facilities being removed, with a bicycle rack and picnic table added in their place. The village wide survey received 220 responses in total (83 were from over 18s). This identified that the majority of respondents did not use the existing basketball court, did think that the provision of a MUGA would improve village life and did think that the facility would reduce anti-social behaviour.

Additional written comments in support of the facility were also included from the consultation events carried out at various schools within the local community, the local air training corps squadron and with local residents. Essington Parish Summary of evidence submitted; Councillor Bryn Whitehouse An extensive amount of information regarding ‘The Mound’ to the north of Essington (adjoining Hobnock Road) is included in the consultation response. This includes minutes of meetings discussing the site, photos of the stiles and access leading to the site, evidence regarding the sites use and a proposed new public access for the site. The covering letter attached states that the site has regular use, listing various local groups and individuals which use the site. It also lists a number of flags which have been flown on the site over the years as part of significant national events (e.g. Remembrance Day). The site is also stated as being used as a local beacon, which was notably lit on the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee (which the submission claims attracted hundreds of local villagers). The covering letter also states that the Parish Council receive regular complaints from people trying to access the site, highlighting that the site would receive further use if it was more accessible via improvements to the existing stiles and public footpaths.

The submission also includes various forms of pictorial evidence. Diagrams detailing views available from the site are included to demonstrate its value of a viewing area. Photos of each access point to the site are included to demonstrate the issues faced when accessing the site. Photos showing the site from various angles are also used to argue for its landscape value. Photos are also included demonstrating the various flags which have been flown on the site, as well as its use as a beacon from the Queen’s Jubilee. Photos from 2007 showing the sites use for sledging are also included.

In addition to this minutes from Essington Parish Council meetings from 1984/1985 discussing the site are also included, alongside proposed plans for where new access routes to the site could be located.

APPENDIX 8 – Tree and Woodland Strategy

TREE AND WOODLAND STRATEGY 2013-2028

FOREWORD

Councillor Robert McCardle Cabinet Member Planning and Business Enterprise

I am pleased to introduce this Tree and Woodland Strategy for South Staffordshire.

Trees and woodlands are important elements that contribute to South Staffordshire's distinctive character.

They are also vital in maintaining and improving the quality of life for all who live, work in and visit the District.

They help clean the air we breathe, improve a community’s health and wellbeing, create a calming setting in which to live and work and provide a habitat for a wide range of plants and animals. They also create attractive settings that help to encourage economic investment.

The Council recognises the importance of the District's trees and woodlands and, through its own actions will conserve, manage and enhance them wherever possible in order to maintain their significance and status within the landscape. We will also seek to encourage others to do the same. As public awareness of environmental issues becomes more prominent, there is an increasing need to focus attention on trees and their role in providing a more pleasant environment.

This Tree and Woodland Strategy sets out the ways in which South Staffordshire Council will manage its tree resource, details our priorities to guide and improve tree and woodland management, and specifies what needs to be done to achieve these objectives.

We are determined to make sure that our Tree and Woodland Strategy reflects the needs of South Staffordshire's communities. We want to deliver our vision and ensure the longevity of South Staffordshire's tree and woodland resources for the benefit of residents, visitors and the environment.

Contents

INTRODUCTION 1

1 A VISION FOR TREES AND WOODLANDS IN SOUTH

STAFFORDSHIRE 2

Background 2

Why develop a Tree and Woodland Strategy? 2

A more moderate climate 3

Healthy living 3

A thriving local economy 3

Stability and reclamation of land 3

Useful products 4

Richer and more accessible wildlife 4

Enhanced landscape quality 4

Sustainable communities 4

Scope of the Strategy 5

Strategy Purpose and Vision 5

2 THE CURRENT PICTURE 7

Policy Context 7

Legislation, National Policies and Strategies 7

The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 7

A Strategy for England's Trees, Woods and Forests 7

Trees in Towns II 8

Regional Policies and Strategies 8

West Midlands Forestry Framework 8

Local Policies and Strategies 9

South Staffordshire Sustainable Community Strategy 2008/20 9

South Staffordshire Core Strategy - a Local Plan for South

Staffordshire 10

South Staffordshire Design Guide 10

South Staffordshire Open Space Strategy 10

Staffordshire Biodiversity Action Plan 11

Cannock Chase AONB Management Plan 2009-2014 12

Current Practice 12

Tree Preservation orders and Trees in Conservation Areas 12

Development Management including Section 106 Agreements 12

Involvement in the Cannock Chase AONB 13

Free Tree Scheme 13

Tree Wardens 13

Management of Open Spaces 14

3 THE WAY FORWARD - ACHIEVING THE VISION 15

Partnerships 15

The Sustainable Community Strategy 16

Trees, woodlands and Children/Young People 16

Trees, woodlands and Community Safety 17

Trees, woodlands and Environmental Quality 17

Trees, woodlands and Economic Vibrancy 18

Trees, woodlands and Health/Wellbeing 18

Trees, woodlands and Housing 19

Cannock Chase AONB 19

Community Involvement 20

Tree and Woodland Management 21

Management of Woodlands 21

Management of Trees on Open Spaces 21

Tree Protection 22

Trees and Development 22

Tree Preservation Orders 23

iii

Introduction

Trees and woodlands are a valuable part of South Staffordshire's environment. They have a significant impact on our quality of life, enhancing both urban and rural environments and providing the people of South Staffordshire with a distinctive, valuable and attractive resource.

The benefits that can be gained from having a healthy tree stock are numerous, so it is therefore extremely important to ensure it remains an integral part of the District's distinctive landscape for many years to come.

The purpose of this document is to provide a long-term strategy that will ensure well managed, healthy trees and woodlands by setting out the actions necessary in order to achieve this. Further, this strategy is ultimately a statement of the Council’s priorities in relation to trees and woodlands.

Over the life of the strategy, delivery against its Priorities will ensure that the district's trees and woodlands are managed and maintained for the long term benefit of South Staffordshire's residents, visitors and its distinctive environment.

1 A Vision for Trees and Woodland in South Staffordshire

Background

Prior to 3000BC, 85% of the UK was covered with woodland before large areas were cleared for farming. By the end of the 11th Century tree cover had fallen to 15%. It fell as low as 5% by the end of the 19th Century before increasing again to the current national figure. The woodland coverage of South Staffordshire currently amounts to 8.5% of its total land area compared with 7.8% for Staffordshire and 8.4% for England.

Whilst many trees and woodlands are located on private land, there are individual and groups of trees found on the many open spaces within the district's villages that also contribute to the general tree cover in South Staffordshire. These may not always be described as woodland but do nonetheless make a very significant visual contribution to the urban forest and landscape character of the district whilst at the same time providing a number of other community, wildlife and climate benefits.

Over the last twenty years, the values we attach to trees and woodlands have changed. It has become widely recognised that there are significant benefits to maintaining tree cover in both urban and rural areas. Following extensive research, in 2005, The National Urban Forestry Unit published Trees Matter! which details the benefits of trees in urban areas. Although South Staffordshire is a predominantly rural district there are a number of large settlements within which are significant areas of open space that contain woodlands, small groups of trees and individual trees. The benefits of trees are therefore applicable to rural villages as much as they are to major urban areas. Equally, it could be argued that there is a strong case for maintaining and, where appropriate, increasing tree cover across the district as a whole. This strategy also, therefore strongly relates to the South Staffordshire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) and, in particular, the references to landscape character.

Why develop a tree and woodland strategy?

It is important that tree cover across South Staffordshire is maintained and increased (where appropriate) over the long-term in order that the benefits trees and woodlands provide can be enjoyed by those that live and work in the district and by those who visit. This Strategy is intended to provide for closer collaboration between South Staffordshire Council, landowners, other public and private organisations and businesses that have influence on trees and woodlands in South Staffordshire. Only by working in this way will the trees and woodlands in the district be safeguarded and well managed for the benefit of the environment and people alike. Within this strategy, the Council is setting out a number of priorities linked to a broad range of themes and the Action Plan set out in Chapter 4 provides the means for delivery against these. It is envisaged that this will create a more cohesive approach to the management of South Staffordshire's trees and woodlands. As already mentioned, there are clear benefits to increasing tree cover generally and in built-up areas specifically. These are considered in more detail below.

A more moderate climate

As well as absorbing carbon dioxide (the main greenhouse gas) and producing oxygen, trees filter, absorb and reduce pollutant gases including ozone, sulphur dioxide, carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide. Trees work all year round for us by reducing localised extremes in temperatures – cooling in the summer and warming in the winter. Large leaf canopies catch rainfall, slowing down the water’s progress from sky to ground, thus helping to reduce flash flooding. The shelter and shade from trees can save up to 10% of the energy required to heat and cool nearby buildings. Whatever the causes of climate change, latest scientific evidence has powerfully reinforced the fact that it is by far the greatest threat to our natural environment and social well-being. It has unprecedented implications for biodiversity and landscape character through effect on trees by:

 Greater extremes in temperature fluctuations  Drought  Flooding  Consequent flourishing of tree pests and diseases

The Council will monitor the position and guidance on climate change and take any necessary actions to preserve its existing tree stock and, if appropriate in order to preserve long term tree cover, will consider the planting of non-indigenous tree species. This latter course would only be taken if indigenous tree species could not be found to cope with any expected changes in temperature and conditions.

Healthy living

Trees release oxygen for us to breathe, filter polluted air, reduce chemical smog formation, shade out harmful solar radiation and provide an attractive, calming setting for recreation. In so doing, trees have a positive effect in reducing the incidences of skin cancer and many stress related illnesses along with providing a sense of wellbeing through softening the urban environment.

A thriving local economy

Trees help to create jobs and increase productivity and innovation. A well-treed area encourages inward investment and can increase property values by up to 18%. When planted strategically, trees can reduce fossil fuel emissions by reducing fuel costs in the heating and cooling of buildings

Stability and reclamation of land

Tree roots help bind soil particles together and to prevent erosion. Some species can also be used to clean up contaminated land. Trees are effective at stabilising contaminated land by reducing soil erosion and off-site particulate migration. Research by the Forestry Commission (2002) suggests that trees can promote the breakdown of many organic contaminants and help to remove pollutants, thereby reducing the transfer of contamination and potential exposure to humans and the environment. Trees can, however, acidify soil, which may lead to the mobilisation of some contaminants (particularly heavy metals). Evidence suggests that woodland has a strong and positive part to play in the future development of contaminated

land, but this will require careful consideration in terms of species selection and the contaminants present on-site.

Useful products

Trees provide a sustainable source of timber for traditional products such as charcoal and garden furniture as well as compost from leaves and woodchip biofuel and the many varieties of fruit.

Richer and more accessible wildlife

Trees are vital components of the ecosystems in our villages supporting a diversity of wildlife that people can enjoy close to home. They are also important habitats for invertebrates, birds and mammals in rural areas located away from the main settlements.

Enhanced landscape quality

Trees and woodlands contribute very significantly to the character of the local area by providing a sense of place, long-term stability and a living link with the past.

Trees soften the often hard urban landscape, making it greener and more attractive whilst giving variety of scale, form, colour and shape.

Sustainable communities

Communities have the opportunity to play an active part in caring for their local trees and woodlands, which helps build more confidence and shared enjoyment.

Green Infrastructure (GI)

Trees and woodlands are important components of Green Infrastructure. This may take the form of an increase in street trees in South Staffordshire’s villages, small pockets of woodland planting within public open spaces or the creation of extensive new woodlands.

The main reasons for developing a Tree and Woodland Strategy are therefore:

 To improve management and maximise the benefits of trees and woodlands;  To protect and enhance levels of biodiversity and ecological habitats;  To help create sustainable communities;  To co-ordinate action and develop partnership working;  To support national, regional and local policy objectives;  To contribute to wider Council objectives including health and biodiversity;  To access more funding opportunities;  To promote investment in trees and woodlands;  To champion and raise awareness of the benefits of trees and woodlands.

By considering all of these benefits together within one key document that makes the links to other Council and non-council agendas, strategies and plans it will enable a coordinated approach to planning for the future in relation to trees and woodlands.

Scope of the Strategy

The main aim of this strategy is to set out ways to maintain, safeguard and increase the numbers of South Staffordshire's trees and woodlands. This should be informed by a landscape character approach and within Green Infrastructure considerations. New planting should comprise native species in order to link to the Staffordshire Biodiversity Action Plan (SBAP). It is, however, recognised that in certain circumstances, the planting of non-native trees is appropriate. The strategy is a key piece of background evidence, supporting a number of policies within the Council’s new Local Plan (Core Strategy), which will result in delivery of the Priorities and action plan. The strategy action plan is based around four broad key themes, namely:

 Tree and woodland management  Trees and development  Tree protection  Partnerships

It is appropriate that this document links closely to the six themes within the Sustainable Community Strategy. This, along with the above, is explored more fully in Chapter Three. Actions will be developed around these themes that will also make the connections to other relevant Council and non-Council strategies and plans where appropriate.

This Strategy sets out the ways in which its objectives will be achieved over the life of the document through a number of priorities and actions developed from them.

Strategy Purpose and Vision

The strategy aims to promote the important contribution of both public and privately owned trees in South Staffordshire and, ensure as far as possible, that they are safeguarded and sustainably managed for the benefit of the community and the environment. The strategy sets out a vision for trees and woodlands across the District and will be used to:

 Provide a framework in which to manage the Council's tree stock sustainably  Encourage, support and influence tree and woodland owners to follow sustainable management practices  Provide policies in relation to trees and woodlands and in particular, to support and influence the Council's Local Plan  Set out the basis for decision making in relation to new development where existing trees could potentially be affected  Provide clarity in the form of supplementary planning guidance for anyone who is preparing to submit a planning application where trees may be affected  Safeguard the District's important and veteran trees  Build constructive and appropriate new and maintain existing partnerships for the benefit of the district's trees and woodlands  Promote the important and environmental benefits that trees provide  Promote the planting of native trees  Protect, where appropriate, both public and privately owned trees and woodlands

 Encourage the planting and establishment of new trees and woodlands that will enhance biodiversity, local character and landscape quality  Ensure a co-ordinated, co-operative and sustainable approach to the management of all trees and woodlands within the District, encouraging the use of best practice across both the public and private sectors  Develop community participation using Tree Warden and Friends Group schemes and activities.

2 The Current Picture

Policy context

There are numerous existing national, regional and local policies and strategies that relate to trees and woodlands, all of which are relevant to the preparation of this Tree and Woodland Strategy. In meeting the aims and objectives of the policies and strategies detailed below - by delivering against the priorities and the action plan in this strategy - the vision for trees and woodlands in South Staffordshire can be achieved.

Legislation, National Policies and Strategies

The Town and Country Planning Act 1990

Section 219 of The Act sets out the legislative framework within which the Council makes decisions in relation to trees covered by Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs) and the making of new TPOs along with the procedure for dealing with trees in conservation areas. The Council determines applications for works to trees protected by TPOs and notifications for trees in conservation areas as laid down in the Act. This also forms the basis for any enforcement action that the Council may take in relation to offences involving protected trees.

The UK Forestry Standard

The UK Forestry Standard (UKFS) is the reference standard for sustainable forest management in the UK. The UKFS, supported by its series of Guidelines, outlines the context for forestry in the UK, sets out the approach of the UK Government to sustainable forest management, defines standards and requirements and provides a basis for regulation and monitoring.

Government Forestry and Woodlands Policy Statement – incorporating the Government’s response to the Independent Panel on Forestry’s Final Report

Within this Policy Statement, the UK Government has confirmed its support for the vision of the Independent Panel on Forestry and has accepted many of its recommendations in full. In particular, the Government agreed with the Panel on:

 The need to develop a new woodland culture and a resilient forestry and woodland sector  The value of the Public Forest Estate, which will continue to benefit from public ownership, be held in trust for the nation and be managed by a new operationally-independent body  The importance of protecting woodland assets  The need to bring more woodland into active management and increase the extent of woodland cover in England  The need to help the sector find its voice and improve its economic performance  The importance of preserving and maximising the social and environmental benefits provided by trees and woodlands  The scope for developing new markets based around a better understanding of the value potential of trees, woods and forests

 The value of retaining a skilled cadre of forestry experts within the public sector

The Panel’s report therefore underpins a refreshed Government forestry policy.

Trees in Towns 2

Trees in Towns 2, a study by the Department of Communities and Local Government of Local Authorities’ tree services was published in 2008. It highlights the importance of having a ‘working’ tree strategy and offers guidance on preparation and ensuring its implementation. The key recommendations are:

 The tree strategy should be based on a good knowledge of the existing tree population and the conditions in which it grows  The process of strategy preparation should have political and community support  It should be linked to other aspects of the urban environment and other relevant strategies  It should cover all aspects of the LA’s tree programme and the urban forest, including both public and privately owned trees and woodlands  Ensure widespread and effective consultation on the draft strategy document  It should not just include policies towards trees but also an action plan to ensure implementation  It should be adopted as LA policy  Ensure regular monitoring and review of the strategy

The Charter for Trees, Woods and People

This new national charter, led by the Woodland Trust, sets out ten key principles to help recognise and protect the value of trees to society. These principles are:

- Thriving habitats for diverse species - Planting for the future - Celebrating the cultural impact of trees - A thriving forestry sector that delivers for the UK - Better protection for important trees and woods - Enhancing new developments with trees - Understanding and using the natural health benefits of trees - Access to trees for everyone - Addressing threats to woods and trees through good management - Strengthening landscapes with woods and trees

Regional Policies and Strategies

West Midlands Forestry Framework

'Growing Our Future', the West Midlands Forestry Framework (WMRFF), was published in 2004 and aims to inspire and guide those involved in the management of trees, woodlands and forests in the region to secure the sustainable development of this resource. Supported by evidence in the baseline study A Growing Resource, the RFF directly connects to the wider regional agenda, where there are opportunities

to improve the quality of life for everyone. Since 2004, a Delivery Plan has been published each year in close collaboration with stakeholders, with progress on actions and achievements also being reported annually as part of the process. The aims and objectives of the RFF are intended to:

 Illustrate how regional woodland cover may evolve over several decades, helping to deliver new woodlands, manage existing ones and to enhancing quality of life in the region;  Provide a spatial context for the development of woodland and forestry and contribute to urban and rural renaissance;  Chart and facilitate an economically viable woodland and forestry sector that is able to deliver the Framework vision and help improve household incomes in rural areas;  Make clear the relevance of woodland and forestry to people’s everyday needs involving local communities wherever possible;  See a significant increase in the activity of the woodland and forestry sector and its contribution in urban and rural areas and help achieve relevant Public Service Agreement targets;  Strengthen urban-rural links and see woodland and forestry more successfully embedded in wider urban and rural agendas, particularly in urban fringe areas;  Improve understanding of regional woodland and forestry at strategic levels so that the woodland and forestry sector can make an effective contribution to other policies, delivery plans, joined-up agendas and actions;  Illustrate good practice in sustainable development processes by minimising the ecological footprint and by demonstrating: how the woodland and forestry sector can make significant contributions and maximise benefits to health, recreation, recycling, renewable energy, urban and rural regeneration and biodiversity conservation; why health and leisure sectors should engage with and invest in woodland and forestry.

With the current removal of much of the regional tier of government, it is hoped that the work of the Forestry Framework linked to the West Midlands Woodland and Forestry Forum can continue in both refreshed and new ways with continuing local support. It is likely that this work will be closely linked to the Government’s Policy Statement that followed the work of the Independent Panel on Forestry Report.

Further, although 2013 marks the end of the ten-year time horizon of the WMRFF, given the long term nature of woodland and forestry, many of its aims and objectives remain a relevant source of information in guiding the preparation of this Tree and Woodland Strategy.

Local Policies and Strategies

South Staffordshire Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) 2008-2020

The SCS sets out the long-term vision for South Staffordshire, based on the aspirations of those who live and work in the district. There are six key themes within the SCS and all of these can be linked to trees and woodlands:

 Children and Young People

 Community Safety  Economic Vibrancy  Environmental Quality  Health and Wellbeing  Housing

The links between trees and these themes are explored in Chapter 3.

South Staffordshire Core Strategy - A Local Plan for South Staffordshire (The Local Plan)

The Council has taken the decision to include detailed development policies within the Local Plan. The Plan sets out the long-term vision, spatial objectives and core policies to guide the future development of the district. The Plan has undergone Examination in Public and has subsequently been adopted by the Council as the development plan for South Staffordshire. This therefore replaces the saved policies in the 1996 Local Plan and now revoked Structure Plan. Links between the Tree and Woodland Strategy and the Local Plan are explored further in Chapter Three.

South Staffordshire Design Guide

The Design Guide is intended to provide a basis to assist in the complementary development of the district by focusing on the built characteristics which help to create the visual unity of the place. It also recognises the importance of landscape character and the network of green spaces in and around the villages and the contribution these make to local distinctiveness. The document is a supplement to local policies on design to provide detailed, practical advice for all those involved in the development process. There are sections within the Guide that make specific reference to landscape characteristics including trees and woodlands. The Guide therefore assists in underpinning the development management-based objectives of this Tree and Woodland Strategy.

South Staffordshire Open Space Strategy

The previous Open Space Strategy was adopted by the Council in April 2009. It sets out a vision for the provision, enhancement and management of publicly accessible open spaces within South Staffordshire, regardless of land ownership and will be used to:

 Provide for striking an appropriate balance between new open space provision and the enhancement of existing provision in meeting the needs of local people, now and in the future.  Guide and inform policy development through the Local Plan process in relation to the protection, enhancement and accessibility of open spaces

 Provide for the identification of new sites and assessment of the suitability of previously designated sites  Define the value and role of open space in meeting corporate aims and objectives and in supporting the Sustainable Community Strategy  Provide clarity and reasonable certainty for developers and landowners in respect of the requirements and expectations in relation to open space provision and contributions associated with the development of land  Provide for resource allocation that maximises funding to support improvements from internal revenue and capital budgets and external funding sources  Set in place the right circumstances for voluntary and community groups to participate in open space provision and management e.g. friends groups  Ensure greater coordination and partnership working between the District Council, Parish Councils, Staffordshire County Council, South Staffordshire Housing Association and other land management agencies in the management of land, based on locally appropriate standards Trees and woodlands are an integral part of many of South Staffordshire's open spaces, the Open Space Strategy therefore has close links with the Tree and Woodland Strategy. The Open Space Strategy includes an action plan which makes links to all other relevant strategies, policies and plans. This Tree and Woodland Strategy is therefore an integral part of the overall Open Space Strategy. It should be noted that the Open Space Strategy is currently under review and will be updated to form part of a Supplementary Planning Document covering Open Space Sport and Recreation.

Staffordshire Biodiversity Action Plan (SBAP)

Biodiversity Action Plans (BAPs) are the UK’s response to the 1992 convention on Biodiversity, signed at the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit. BAPs focus on habitats and species that are declining and/or require protection. There are many other habitats that may not be subject to any statutory protection or concerted focus of action, that are nonetheless important and valuable in nature conservation terms.

The SBAP has been in place since 1998. It consists of an action plan but is primarily a partnership that works together towards achieving biodiversity targets. The SBAP includes the following habitats and concomitant objectives in relation to trees and woodlands:

 Lowland wood pasture and parkland - maintain existing important areas of lowland wood pasture and parkland

- restore degraded areas of lowland wood pasture and parkland by promoting appropriate management

- increase the amount of lowland wood pasture and parkland in appropriate areas by expansion

 Native woodland - maintain existing areas of native woodland

- contribute to all the UK Woodland Habitat Action Plans that are relevant to Staffordshire

- restore degraded areas of native woodland by promoting appropriate management

- re-create or promote the natural regeneration of native woodland in areas traditionally occupied by this habitat and not currently supporting vegetation of greater importance, in order to expand and link the existing resource

 Wet woodland - maintain existing areas of wet woodland where other key habitats would not be compromised

- restore degraded areas of wet woodland by promoting appropriate management

- re-create or promote the natural regeneration of wet woodland in areas traditionally occupied by this habitat and not currently supporting vegetation of greater importance, in order to expand and link the existing resource

Cannock Chase AONB Management Plan

The Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) is a legal designation and, under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 (CROW), public bodies have a responsibility to “have regard to the purpose of conserving and enhancing the natural beauty of the area of outstanding natural beauty”.

The Cannock Chase AONB Partnership is responsible for fulfilling the statutory duties under the CROW Act. The Partnership has a duty to prepare and review a Management Plan at least every five years. Members of the Cannock Chase AONB Partnership, local communities, local and regional government organisations and other stakeholders have been involved in reviewing the progress of the current Management Plan (2009-14) and will similarly be involved in work prior to the publication of the next Management Plan. The Management Plan is the basis for the strategic direction of the conservation and enhancement of the AONB. It does not stand alone but relates to a range of national, regional and local strategic documents such as the Natural England Strategic Direction, the NPPF and Local Plans. Annual Action Plans are drawn from the AONB Management Plan for the implementation of projects.

Current practice

Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs)/trees in Conservation areas

The Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA) places a duty on Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) to protect trees and woodlands of significance where they may be under threat of removal. The use of TPOs, conservation areas and planning conditions enables the Council to control the felling and pruning of significant trees

by ensuring that the works are necessary and appropriate and that the amenity value of the tree(s) is maintained. Additionally, if appropriate, the replacement of any felled trees can be secured, backed up by the legislation.

To exercise its powers under the TCPA, and in accordance with Government guidance, the authority uses TPO and conservation area legislation to protect trees and woodlands.

Development Management including Section 106 Agreements

Through the development management process, the Council imposes conditions on planning permissions to ensure that trees considered to be of local significance are protected. Subsequently, these are usually backed up by a TPO. Again, if appropriate, the replacement of any felled trees can be secured. The planting of new trees can be required by the imposition of planning conditions. Trees planted as part of new development, even small schemes with perhaps only one or two trees, make an important cumulative contribution to tree cover in the District.

Section 106 Agreements provide a mechanism for securing the planting of new trees and woodlands as part of a developer's planning obligations. The Council has used Section 106 Agreements to good effect to provide new areas of open space that include individual and groups of trees. Section 106 Agreements are also a useful tool in securing management of existing woodland sites when these are linked to new development.

Involvement in Cannock Chase AONB

The Council has in place a Partnership Agreement covering partner's roles and responsibilities in relation to the Cannock Chase AONB. The Council is an active partner in the protection and enhancement of this statutorily designated important landscape and manages its own part of the AONB in accordance with a site management plan that closely links to the broader AONB Management Plan.

Part of the AONB is situated within South Staffordshire and there is therefore a clear link between the AONB Management Plan and the Open Space Strategy, of which, this Tree and Woodland Strategy forms part. Additionally, the AONB is well known for supporting large areas of woodland along with other habitats and it is intended that this document will fit seamlessly with the AONB Management Plan.

Free Tree Scheme

For a number of years, the Council ran a scheme to provide trees free to households in the district. The numbers of trees available each year were limited due to budgetary constraints but over the period that the initiative was running, around 11,000 trees have been given away to people for planting in their gardens, thus making a major contribution to increasing tree cover across the district. Whilst the Council has previously funded this initiative it is proposed that in order to continue the free tree scheme should aim to be funded from external sources and a new partnership has been developed to support this.

Tree Wardens

The Tree Warden Scheme is a national initiative, set up in 1990 by the Tree Council that enables people to play an active role in conserving and enhancing their local trees and woods. South Staffordshire Council has historically been a member of the Tree Warden scheme, starting in 1996, and has coordinated the scheme within the district from the Council offices on behalf of the Tree Council.

Tree Wardens are volunteers, appointed by parish councils or other community organisations, who gather information about their local trees, get involved in local tree matters and encourage local practical projects connected with trees and woods.

The Tree Warden Scheme provides:

 a proven method of working with the community  a cost effective way of consulting the community about trees  a volunteer force who can become the eyes, ears and hands for trees  the ability to empower the community to manage their environment  a method of establishing links with parish councils and other groups

Management of open spaces

The Council proactively seeks opportunities to plant new trees on areas of public open space in order to increase tree cover within the District's settlements and to replenish the tree stock. The latter is particularly important where there are trees of significant age that may be nearing the end of their natural lives. Without this approach, there would be a gradual decline in the number of mature trees within South Staffordshire's villages.

The Council manages its open spaces for biodiversity and encourages a range of habitats that includes trees of all ages from newly planted to veteran. These open spaces are freely accessible to the public.

3 The Way Forward – Achieving the Vision

Partnerships

A large number of South Staffordshire’s trees are growing on areas of public open space, which are often in close proximity to where people live or work. However, a very significant contribution to the district's tree cover is made by other trees that are privately owned or are in the ownership of other public bodies.

Improvements to the management of both public and privately owned trees will require the involvement and co-operation of different departments within the Council as well as parish councils, housing associations, central Government departments, the Forestry Commission, The Canal and River Trust and other public and private landowners.

The main owners of trees and woodlands in South Staffordshire are listed (in no particular order) below:

South Staffordshire Council - Community Services

- Commercial Development Services

 Staffordshire County Council - Highways

- Education (Children and Lifelong Learning Directorate)

 Parish Councils  South Staffordshire Housing Association and other Housing Associations  The Forestry Commission  The Woodland Trust  The National Trust  Staffordshire Wildlife Trust  Private Landowners

Landowners have an impact on the way trees are managed within their own policies and through the requirements of the Forestry Acts and the policies and guidance of the Forestry Commission. The Forestry Commission is the custodian of the public forest estate and manages very large areas of woodland, some of which are located in South Staffordshire. An important part of this is the publicly accessible nature of these woodlands. It is important that these areas remain publicly accessible as they provide opportunities for a range of recreational activities such as walking, mountain biking and horse riding.

A joint approach to management agreed between the different owners would achieve the best results for the benefit of all who live and work in, and for those who pass through, South Staffordshire. Through this Strategy, major landowners will be encouraged to work together to share knowledge and examples of good practice in respect of tree and woodland management.

Priorities

P1 The Council will seek to expand existing woodland areas, encourage the planting of trees and examine the potential for creating new woodlands through planting on its own land and/or by working in partnership with other landowners and the Forestry Commission.

P2 The Council will maintain its partnerships with The Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

P3 New partnerships will be sought that contribute to the aims of this Strategy.

P4 The Council will promote tree and woodland initiatives where appropriate.

P5 The Council will work with other organisations and landowners to protect both legislated and non-legislated public access to woodland sites, where this currently exists and will seek to influence the opening up of additional sites for public access where this would not compromise any indicator plant species and other important wildlife habitats.

The Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS)

The Tree and Woodland Strategy provides the opportunity to propose measures and develop actions around the six themes of the Sustainable Community Strategy and these are set out below.

Trees, woodlands and Children/Young People

Children and young people can gain enormous benefit from interaction with trees and woodland. There are both formal and non-formal educational benefits to be gained from encouraging children and young people to explore their local woodlands and open spaces. Trees and woodlands can be considered as natural play areas and provide children and young people with opportunities to develop their physical skills and a degree of independence in their informal learning, whilst at the same time interacting with the natural environment. Additionally, trees and woodlands can be used as an 'outdoor classroom', supporting most aspects of the formal curriculum at all key stages. Involving children and young people from an early age with trees and woodlands helps instil a sense of care for the natural environment.

Priorities

SCS1 Opportunities will be sought for engaging children and young people in the management and improvement of woodlands and in the planting of new trees.

SCS2 The Council, through its appropriate partner organisations, will seek to reduce vandalism to trees and woodlands by increasing environmental awareness in schools.

Trees, woodlands and Community Safety

The ways in which trees on open spaces and publicly accessible woodlands are managed has an impact on perceptions of those who use these sites in respect of safety. Under- managed woodlands, in particular, can feel oppressive through being dark and densely vegetated. It is therefore important that publicly accessible woodlands are managed in a way that creates safe feeling environments to encourage their use. Increased use leads to less anti-social behaviour.

Management of woodlands should aim to deal with anti-social behaviour. This would require a coordinated approach from a number of service areas within the Council and partnership working with other landowners who allow public access to their sites.

Priorities

SCS3 The Council will ensure it meets its legal obligations to maintain the safety of people and property in relation to its trees and woodlands whilst, as far as possible, maintaining and improving diverse wildlife habitats.

Trees, woodlands and Environmental Quality

Trees and woodlands create healthier places to live and support a variety of wildlife habitats, making a very significant contribution to biodiversity and, in particular, targets in the SBAP. Linked to health, trees clean the air by filtering fine particulates associated with vehicle and factory emissions. In certain circumstances, trees can also be used as a method for cleaning up contaminated land where sites are proposed for improvement and or development over the longer term. Additionally, increasing tree cover in built-up areas significantly helps to reduce flash flooding by slowing storm water run-off.

Creating new woodlands is an excellent way of improving derelict sites. This consequently has a range of biodiversity benefits as well as improving the outlook of local residents. This also helps to improve the landscape generally which, research has shown, links well to economic vibrancy through attracting inward investment.

Priorities

SCS4 The Council will ensure that every opportunity is taken to establish new trees and expand and develop new woodlands on appropriate sites in the district with a primary focus on native tree planting.

SCS5 The Council will aim to provide a sustainable, high quality tree population and will engage with other landowners as appropriate.

SCS6 As far as possible, the Council will plant trees grown from locally collected seed provenance.

SCS7 The Council will seek to create a diverse and appropriate tree population by:

(a) giving careful consideration to the selection of tree species; and

(b) increasing the diversity of tree species in planting schemes to prevent the development of monocultures.

Trees, woodlands and Economic Vibrancy

Trees and, in particular, woodlands help support the local economy by the production of wood products, providing the basis for new business ventures and supporting existing businesses to diversify through sustainable wood product development such as wood chip pellets for wood fired heating systems. Indeed, in exploiting the potential for woodfuel, there are resulting opportunities for increased woodland management.

The major woodland sites in the District are also a focus for tourism, which in conjunction with other destinations in South Staffordshire assist in supporting the local economy.

Priorities

SCS8 The Council will work to promote its major woodland sites and work with other landowners and businesses to encourage tourism and to support the woodland economy.

SCS9 The Council will encourage landowners to diversify towards a woodland economy where viable and where site locations are considered to be appropriate.

Trees, woodlands and Health/Wellbeing

As already mentioned, more urban trees mean cleaner air. By providing shade in our open spaces, and woodlands, trees play a part in helping to reduce incidences of skin cancer. Additionally trees have an important role to play in reducing stress. Research has shown that those who arrive at work having travelled through a well-treed environment arrive feeling less stressed than those who have not. Perhaps most significantly, research has clearly demonstrated a link between trees and recovery from illness, it has been demonstrated that hospital patients with a view of trees recover from surgery more quickly (Ulrich, R. 1984), which helps to reduce pressure on the National Health Service (NHS). The NHS is currently promoting a forest project - The NHS Forest - that is being coordinated by the Centre for Sustainable Healthcare. The project’s central aims are:

 Improving health of staff, patients and communities through increasing access to green space on or near to NHS land;  Greening the NHS Estates and planting 1 tree per employee amounting to 1.3 million trees within the next 5 years;  Encouraging greater social cohesion between NHS sites and the local community;  Bringing together a range of professionals and volunteers to produce woodland that includes the use of art, food crops, woodfuel and biodiversity.

The networks of canals that meander through South Staffordshire also have an important role to play in people's health and link well to this strategy. The canals are often bordered by tree belts and small pockets of woodland. The towpaths are publicly accessible and provide opportunities for walking routes linking to areas of wooded open space.

Priorities

SCS10 The Council will seek to work in partnership with healthcare professionals in order to exploit the health benefits of trees and woodlands.

SCS11 The Council will promote tree and woodland-based activities as part of people's health and wellbeing.

Trees, woodlands and Housing

Tree belts and woodlands help to create shelter from the elements and in doing so lessen energy consumption by reducing heating bills in winter and helping to keep properties cooler in summer. It has been shown that property values can be up to 18% higher in well-treed areas.

Trees are an important factor in the places where people live and provide a sense of scale, visual interest, and help to 'soften' the hard urban landscape. Used appropriately, trees are a vital component within new developments and are valuable additions to existing settlements.

Green infrastructure is a significant and integral part of new development. Trees and woodland form a major component of this, both through the planting of new trees and woodlands and by retaining existing trees on potential development sites.

Priorities

SCS12 The Council will seek to ensure that trees are included in landscape scheme submissions on any new developments and for schemes associated with the provision of new open space.

SCS13 Where appropriate, planning obligations will be used to provide for tree planting on existing open spaces, particularly where it is impractical to provide for significant numbers of trees within smaller developments.

SCS14 The Council will expect landscape schemes as part of any new development to have regard to any statutorily designated landscapes through appropriate tree and woodland planting that reflects the special qualities of those places.

It will be important in enacting the priorities relating to the six themes of the SCS, to give consideration to the potential impacts on existing woodland sites and to ensure any proposals and schemes are appropriate to the existing character and biodiversity of those woodlands.

Cannock Chase AONB

Shoal Hill Common, between Penkridge and Huntington is located within the AONB. The site is part woodland and part lowland heath, both of which support important and different habitats. Within the AONB, policies have been developed through a management plan required by national legislation. The plan has been prepared by a Partnership of the relevant local authorities, the Forestry Commission and Natural England. It is therefore important that any proposed policies in this Tree and Woodland Strategy align with the Cannock Chase AONB Management Plan.

Part of Cannock Chase AONB is designated as a Special Area of Conservation (SAC). SACs are areas which have been given special protection under the European Union’s

Habitats Directive. They provide increased protection to a variety of wild animals, plants and habitats and are a vital part of global efforts to conserve the world’s biodiversity. New housing development over a certain size threshold will be required to provide mitigation for the effect on the SAC arising from that development. This should include the planting of trees and the creation of new publicly accessible woodlands where appropriate.

Priorities

AONB1 The Council will maintain its partner role in the Cannock Chase AONB through a Partnership Agreement.

AONB2 In any proposals the Council may bring forward in relation to tree and woodland initiatives, regard will be had to the special qualities of the Cannock Chase AONB and the proposals will accord with the prevailing AONB Management Plan.

AONB 3 Any proposals for large scale monoculture planting will be examined in the context of the special qualities of Cannock Chase AONB and in particular, the nature of views out of the AONB.

Community involvement

Engaging the community is essential in ensuring the long-term aims and objectives of this strategy are achieved. Perhaps the most fundamental issue is the perception people have of treed open spaces and woodlands and how they use them. This encompasses recreational, educational and health and wellbeing uses.

It is envisaged that through the action plan that will eventually form part of this strategy, information will be gathered in relation to people's views, use and perception of woodland sites and trees in general. This will help to inform the approach the Council and other organisations take to the management of woodlands in the district.

Following this it will be important to fully engage the community in ensuring the widest possible support for any proposals in relation to trees and woodlands.

Priorities

CI1 The Council will seek to engage community support for tree and woodland related initiatives through establishing schemes that involve the public more directly with trees in their neighbourhood and by giving support to tree-related community initiatives.

CI2 The Council will endeavour to involve the community by consulting residents, parish councils and other interested parties on proposed large-scale tree works, allowing time for comments to be received and considered where they are conducive to good tree care and do not hinder the abatement of a hazard or nuisance.

Tree and woodland management

Management of Woodlands

It is important that South Staffordshire Council manages its existing woodlands in a sustainable manner to maximise the benefits for local people. Without maintenance being carried out woodlands can deteriorate. Similarly, as young woodlands close canopy, they can, in due course, become dense and shade out much light from the woodland floor, reducing diversity and eventually reducing timber quality and volume. Regular thinning undertaken at appropriate intervals and intensity will address such problems as well as providing a source of wood. This can then be used to provide woodfuel and other useful products. The Council will carefully tailor management plans for each woodland site to ensure its prolonged health and biodiversity. Where necessary and appropriate the Council will seek relevant advice, grants and/or felling licences from the Forestry Commission.

The Council owns a number of mature woodlands such as Baggeridge Country Park near Wombourne and Smiths Rough near Perton. Shoal Hill Common near Huntington is also owned by the Council, but is managed by the Shoal Hill Joint Management Committee.

Variation in woodland management is designed to achieve different objectives. Older mature areas are managed to protect and enhance vulnerable wildlife habitats, maintain biodiversity and public access/safety. Many of the recently planted areas are designed to create attractive surroundings to new development areas whilst at the same time creating wildlife corridors.

There are other mature woodlands in the district that are owned and/or managed by other public bodies such as Staffordshire County Council and the Forestry Commission, in addition to a range of other organisations such as Staffordshire Wildlife Trust, The Woodland Trust and private estates/individuals

The Council will seek to build on its relationships with these organisations, assisting where possible in the effective management of their woodland sites.

Management of Trees on Open Spaces

The Council has in place a Tree Management System that provides for regular inspections of trees at appropriate intervals and for the identification of any work that may be required. The benefits of this are two-fold. Firstly, it assists in ensuring trees are as safe as possible whilst bearing in mind that they are living organisms and cannot, therefore, be guaranteed 100% safe. Secondly any necessary work required to trees such as pruning or pollarding will be carried out with the aim of securing the tree's long- term retention.

Priorities

TWM1 The Council will ensure that the highest possible standards of tree work and management are in keeping with best practice and are carried out to relevant British Standards.

TWM2 Formative pruning of young trees will be carried out to establish a well framed crown with a dominant leader in order to reduce the need for

future, potentially negative, ad-hoc reactive maintenance that could be detrimental to the long term health and vigour of the tree.

TWM3 The Council will not carry out pruning or felling of trees to alleviate daylight or television reception problems unless it is clear that pruning would be in the best interests of the tree or in the case of felling, for reasons of safety.

TWM4 Where necessary, the Council will address the problem of an ageing tree population through development and implementation of phased replacement planting programmes. This may result in the felling of trees where they have been assessed as being in the advanced stages of decline.

TWM5 The Council will not fell trees on its land unless there are sound arboricultural or site management reasons.

TWM6 The Council will promote the importance of the management, care and value of trees to increase public awareness.

TWM7 When carrying out woodland management operations on its sites, the Council will have regard to any protected plants and animals and will comply with all relevant legislation related to protected species.

TWM8 When carrying out woodland management operations on its sites, the Council will have regard to the role that trees and woodlands can play in delivering positive outcomes for flooding and water quality.

Tree protection

Trees and development

The most common threats to trees and a common reason for making a TPO is the proposed development of land upon which trees are growing. Plans are often submitted showing trees that are in conflict with the proposals, or in poor condition, making retention out of the question.

A tree may take a century to reach maturity but it can be irreparably damaged or felled in only a few minutes. Such damage is often unwittingly caused because of a failure to appreciate the vulnerability of trees, particularly the roots and how easily they can be damaged.

To avoid such problems and to ensure a harmonious relationship between trees and structures, careful planning and expert advice is needed on their position within new developments and their relationship to new buildings. It is important for trees to be considered at the earliest stages of any proposal. Ideally, pre-planning site discussions involving all parties, including the Council, should take place.

Where there are trees on or adjacent to a site detailed information as set out in chapters 4 to 9 (inclusive) of British Standard 5837, ‘Trees in relation to construction – recommendations’ will need to be submitted to the Council with any planning application

(where 2 or more dwellings are concerned or for any industrial development). This includes, land and tree surveys, a tree constraints plan, arboricultural implications assessment, arboricultural method statement and tree protection plan and details.

Failure to submit the required information with a planning application may result in non- validation or delays in the consideration and decision making process.

Developers will be expected to comply with conditions and agreed working methods. If this is not the case, compliance will be enforced through the planning process as appropriate.

Protection of trees is not only achieved through the statutory process. A large number of trees have been saved from inappropriate pruning or felling due to advice given by Council Officers. This advice is given free of charge and is important in contributing to the protection of trees.

Separate specific, but informal guidance will be produced that explains the above in more detail and which will be of use to developers and owners of trees when making decisions about the retention of trees and/or any proposed tree work. Further, many of the policies within this document are related to the spatial vision for the District set out in the LDF. In order to ensure that trees and woodlands are safeguarded within the planning process, consideration will therefore be given to the preparation of a specific supplementary planning document covering trees and woodlands.

Priorities

TD1 All planning applications submitted to the Council must clearly identify the positions and details of trees on the development site and any trees adjacent to it. Details will include a full tree survey, arboricultural impact assessment and arboricultural method statements.

TD2 The Council will continue to protect ancient woodland and trees, in accordance with Policy EQ1 of the Council’s Core Strategy.

Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs)

The Council will consider protecting trees and woodlands of high amenity value, which may be under threat from development (or other) pressures, by the making of a TPO. Trees growing within conservation areas are automatically protected as 6 weeks notification is required to be given to the Council prior to any works being carried out. This enables the Council to consider if the works are appropriate and whether a TPO should be made.

To assess the ‘amenity value’ of trees for inclusion in Tree Preservation Orders, an Amenity Evaluation Checklist will be used. The Checklist will ensure that there is a consistent and structured approach to amenity evaluation, providing a transparent approach to tree protection.

Priorities

TP1 The Council will exercise its powers, where appropriate, under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the making of Tree Preservation Orders. The Council will generally only protect trees that are in good health and structurally sound. Consideration will be given to protecting other trees, such as veterans, that may not be in the best of health or contain cavities and decay where they are not a risk to the public and are a valuable wildlife habitat.

TP2 The Council will resist the unnecessary removal or pruning of trees unless supported by sound arboricultural reasons.

TP3 The Council will seek to deter damage to its tree stock by, where appropriate, prosecuting anyone found damaging Council-owned trees.

In order to ensure the policies contained within this strategy are put into practice, more detailed action plans will be prepared as appropriate. This will ensure that there is a cascade from broad priority decisions down to more specific site and community work. Close partnership working with relevant service areas within the Council and all other agencies will be required to ensure that a number of the priorities are delivered.