DOCSLIB.ORG

Examining the Efficiency, Stability, and Integrity of the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

S. HRG. 111–922 EXAMINING THE EFFICIENCY, STABILITY, AND INTEGRITY OF THE U.S. CAPITAL MARKETS JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SECURITIES, INSURANCE, AND INVESTMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE AND THE PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION ON EXAMINING THE EFFICIENCY, STABILITY, AND INTEGRITY OF THE U.S. CAPITAL MARKETS DECEMBER 8, 2010 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs ( Available at: http://www.fdsys.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 65–272 PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut, Chairman TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama JACK REED, Rhode Island ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York JIM BUNNING, Kentucky EVAN BAYH, Indiana MIKE CRAPO, Idaho ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey BOB CORKER, Tennessee DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii JIM DEMINT, South Carolina SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DAVID VITTER, Louisiana JON TESTER, Montana MIKE JOHANNS, Nebraska HERB KOHL, Wisconsin KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas MARK R. WARNER, Virginia JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado EDWARD SILVERMAN, Staff Director WILLIAM D. DUHNKE, Republican Staff Director DAWN RATLIFF, Chief Clerk WILLIAM FIELDS, Hearing Clerk SHELVIN SIMMONS, IT Director JIM CROWELL, Editor SUBCOMMITTEE ON SECURITIES, INSURANCE, AND INVESTMENT JACK REED, Rhode Island, Chairman JIM BUNNING, Kentucky, Ranking Republican Member TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah EVAN BAYH, Indiana MIKE CRAPO, Idaho ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey BOB CORKER, Tennessee DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii DAVID VITTER, Louisiana SHERROD BROWN, Ohio MIKE JOHANNS, Nebraska MARK R. WARNER, Virginia MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut KARA M. STEIN, Subcommittee Staff Director WILLIAM HENDERSON, Republican Subcommittee Staff Director PAUL SAULSKI, SEC Detailee DEAN SHAHINIAN, Senior Counsel LEVON BAGRAMIAN, Legislative Assistant (II) COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut, Chairman CARL LEVIN, Michigan SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii TOM COBURN, Oklahoma THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware SCOTT P. BROWN, Massachusetts MARK L. PRYOR, Arkansas JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada JON TESTER, Montana LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware MARK KIRK, Illinois MICHAEL L. ALEXANDER, Staff Director BRANDON L. MILHORN, Minority Staff Director and Chief Counsel TRINA DRIESSNACK TYRER, Chief Clerk PATRICIA R. HOGAN, Publications Clerk and GPO Detailee PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS CARL LEVIN, Michigan, Chairman THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware TOM COBURN, Oklahoma MARK L. PRYOR, Arkansas SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona JON TESTER, Montana JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware ELISE J. BEAN, Staff Director and Chief Counsel CHRISTOPHER J. BARKLEY, Minority Staff Director DAVID H. KATZ, Counsel TY GELLASCH, Office of Senator Carl Levin MARY D. ROBERTSON, Chief Clerk ANTHONY COTTO, Counsel to the Minority (III) CONTENTS WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2010 Page Opening statement of Chairman Reed ................................................................... 1 Opening statement of Chairman Levin ................................................................. 3 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 52 WITNESSES Mary L. Schapiro, Chairman, Securities and Exchange Commission ................. 8 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 78 Responses to written questions of: Chairman Reed .......................................................................................... 169 Chairman Levin ......................................................................................... 171 Senator Coburn ......................................................................................... 176 Gary Gensler, Chairman, Commodity Futures Trading Commission ................. 10 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 84 James J. Angel, Associate Professor of Finance, McDonough School of Busi- ness, Georgetown University ............................................................................... 24 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 87 Responses to written questions of: Chairman Reed .......................................................................................... 179 Thomas Peterffy, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Interactive Brokers Group .................................................................................................................... 26 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 156 Responses to written questions of: Chairman Reed .......................................................................................... 187 Manoj Narang, Chief Executive Officer, Tradeworx, Inc. .................................... 27 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 159 Kevin Cronin, Global Head of Equity Trading, Invesco Limited ......................... 29 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 161 Steve Luparello, Vice Chairman, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ...... 31 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 164 ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SUPPLIED FOR THE RECORD Letter Submitted by Timothy B. Henseler, Deputy Director, Securities and Exchange Commission ......................................................................................... 189 (IV) EXAMINING THE EFFICIENCY, STABILITY, AND INTEGRITY OF THE U.S. CAPITAL MAR- KETS WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2010 U.S. SENATE, SUBCOMMITTEE ON SECURITIES, INSURANCE, AND INVESTMENT, COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS, PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS, OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS, Washington, DC. The Subcommittees met at 3:30 p.m., in room SD–538, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Jack Reed, Chairman of the Sub- committee, presiding. OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN JACK REED Chairman REED. Let me call the hearing to order, and I want to thank the Members of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investiga- tions, chaired by Senator Levin, for joining us in the joint hearing this afternoon. Both of our Subcommittees are extremely interested in understanding both the causes and implications of the May 6th Flash Crash, and in particular, we want to focus on how we can avoid and mitigate the effects of such events in the future. I am going to make an opening statement. I have been informed that Senator Bunning may be delayed and asked us to go ahead. Then I will turn it over to Chairman Levin who will recognize Sen- ator Coburn when he arrives. Also, under the rules of the Committee on Investigations, wit- nesses are sworn, and I will ask Chairman Levin to do the—after my opening statement, when the witnesses are introduced, to do the official swearing-in according to the rules of his Subcommittee. I certainly want to thank Chairman Schapiro and Chairman Gensler for being here, and all our other witnesses, and I want to commend both Chairman Schapiro and Chairman Gensler for the effort, the collaboration, the hard work they have done already to implement the Dodd-Frank bill. It was a spirit that has been no- ticed of cooperation and collaboration, which is a model for all of us. Thank you so much. I want to also apologize ahead of time for the schedule of the Senate. First we had to delay the hearing, and I thank the wit- nesses for understanding that. We also understand that a series of four votes will begin some time after 4 p.m. this afternoon. It is our (1) 2 hope that we can proceed, get the opening statements of at least our first panel, questions. Senator Levin and I have agreed to shut- tle back and forth so that we do not necessarily have to recess the hearing. So we will do our best to maintain the continuity of the hearing throughout the afternoon, but I apologize again for these four votes that are pending. Let me now focus on the substance of our hearing. Although the recently released report on the events of May 6th was quite thor- ough and thoughtful, the length of time it took to complete is an issue. What tools do our regulators need so that they can under- stand what is happening in our capital markets when it is hap- pening, or at least very shortly thereafter? That is, I think, one of the first issues. What resources do you need to effectively surveil and oversee capital markets, particularly markets that are evolving at such a tremendous rate given technology? In the
Recommended publications
  • A Financial System That Creates Economic Opportunities Nonbank Financials, Fintech, and Innovation

    A Financial System That Creates Economic Opportunities Nonbank Financials, Fintech, and Innovation

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY A Financial System That Creates Economic Opportunities A Financial System That T OF EN TH M E A Financial System T T R R A E P A E S That Creates Economic Opportunities D U R E Y H T Nonbank Financials, Fintech, 1789 and Innovation Nonbank Financials, Fintech, and Innovation Nonbank Financials, Fintech, TREASURY JULY 2018 2018-04417 (Rev. 1) • Department of the Treasury • Departmental Offices • www.treasury.gov U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY A Financial System That Creates Economic Opportunities Nonbank Financials, Fintech, and Innovation Report to President Donald J. Trump Executive Order 13772 on Core Principles for Regulating the United States Financial System Steven T. Mnuchin Secretary Craig S. Phillips Counselor to the Secretary T OF EN TH M E T T R R A E P A E S D U R E Y H T 1789 Staff Acknowledgments Secretary Mnuchin and Counselor Phillips would like to thank Treasury staff members for their contributions to this report. The staff’s work on the report was led by Jessica Renier and W. Moses Kim, and included contributions from Chloe Cabot, Dan Dorman, Alexan- dra Friedman, Eric Froman, Dan Greenland, Gerry Hughes, Alexander Jackson, Danielle Johnson-Kutch, Ben Lachmann, Natalia Li, Daniel McCarty, John McGrail, Amyn Moolji, Brian Morgenstern, Daren Small-Moyers, Mark Nelson, Peter Nickoloff, Bimal Patel, Brian Peretti, Scott Rembrandt, Ed Roback, Ranya Rotolo, Jared Sawyer, Steven Seitz, Brian Smith, Mark Uyeda, Anne Wallwork, and Christopher Weaver. ii A Financial System That Creates Economic
  • Did Spillovers from Europe Indeed Contribute to the 2010 U.S. Flash Crash?

    Did Spillovers from Europe Indeed Contribute to the 2010 U.S. Flash Crash?

    No. 622 / January 2019 Did Spillovers From Europe Indeed Contribute to the 2010 U.S. Flash Crash? David-Jan Jansen Did Spillovers From Europe Indeed Contribute to the 2010 U.S. Flash Crash? David-Jan Jansen * * Views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect official positions of De Nederlandsche Bank. De Nederlandsche Bank NV Working Paper No. 622 P.O. Box 98 1000 AB AMSTERDAM January 2019 The Netherlands Did Spillovers From Europe Indeed Contribute to the 2010 U.S. Flash Crash?* David-Jan Jansen a a De Nederlandsche Bank, Amsterdam, The Netherlands This version: January 2019 Abstract Using intraday data, we study spillovers from European stock markets to the U.S. in the hours before the flash crash on 6 May 2010. Many commentators have pointed to negative market sentiment and high volatility during the European trading session before the Flash Crash. However, based on a range of vector autoregressive models, we find no robust evidence that spillovers increased at that time. On the contrary, spillovers on 6 May were mostly smaller than in the preceding days, during which there was great uncertainty surrounding the Greek sovereign debt crisis. The absence of evidence for spillovers underscores the difficulties in understanding the nature of flash events in financial markets. Keywords: flash crash, spillovers, financial stability, connectedness. JEL classifications: G15, N22, N24. * This paper benefitted from discussions with Sweder van Wijnbergen as well as from research assistance by Jack Bekooij. Any errors and omissions remain my responsibility. Views expressed in the paper do not necessarily coincide with those of de Nederlandsche Bank or the Eurosystem.
  • The European Payments Union and the Origins of Triffin's Regional Approach Towards International Monetary Integration

    The European Payments Union and the Origins of Triffin's Regional Approach Towards International Monetary Integration

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Maes, Ivo; Pasotti, Ilaria Working Paper The European Payments Union and the origins of Triffin's regional approach towards international monetary integration NBB Working Paper, No. 301 Provided in Cooperation with: National Bank of Belgium, Brussels Suggested Citation: Maes, Ivo; Pasotti, Ilaria (2016) : The European Payments Union and the origins of Triffin's regional approach towards international monetary integration, NBB Working Paper, No. 301, National Bank of Belgium, Brussels This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/173757 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen
  • Cracks in the Pipeline 2

    Cracks in the Pipeline 2

    MEDIA CONTACT: Lauren Strayer | [email protected] 212-389-1413 FINANCIAL PIPELINE .o rg Series CRACKS IN THE PIPELINE 2 HIGH FREQUENCY TRADING by: Wallace C. Turbeville his is the second of a series of articles, that increase the inefficiency of Capital Intermediation and entitled “The Financial Pipeline Series”, its cost. The increased volumes in the traded markets are examining the underlying validity of the largely a result of high-speed, computer driven trading assertion that regulation of the financial by large banks and smaller specialized firms. This article markets reduces their efficiency. These illustrates how this type of trading (along with other activ- articles assert that the value of the finan- ities discussed in subsequent articles) extracts value from cial markets is often mis-measured. The the Capital Intermediation process rendering it less efficient. efficiency of the market in intermediat- It also describes how the value extracted is a driver of even ing flows between capital investors and more increased volume creating a dangerous and powerful capital users (like manufacturing and service businesses, feedback loop. individuals and governments) is the proper measure. Unreg- Tying increased trading volume to inefficiencies runs ulated markets are found to be chronically inefficient using counter to a fundamental tenet of industry opponents to Tthis standard. This costs the economy enormous amounts financial reform. They assert that burdens on trading will each year. In addition, the inefficiencies create stresses to the reduce volumes and thereby impair the efficient functioning system that make systemic crises inevitable. Only prudent of the markets. regulation that moderates trading behavior can reduce these The industry’s position that increased volume reduces inefficiencies.
  • The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets an International Perspective

    The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets an International Perspective

    The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets An International Perspective FINAL PROJECT REPORT This Report should be cited as: Foresight: The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets (2012) Final Project Report The Government Office for Science, London The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets An International Perspective This Report is intended for: Policy makers, legislators, regulators and a wide range of professionals and researchers whose interest relate to computer trading within financial markets. This Report focuses on computer trading from an international perspective, and is not limited to one particular market. Foreword Well functioning financial markets are vital for everyone. They support businesses and growth across the world. They provide important services for investors, from large pension funds to the smallest investors. And they can even affect the long-term security of entire countries. Financial markets are evolving ever faster through interacting forces such as globalisation, changes in geopolitics, competition, evolving regulation and demographic shifts. However, the development of new technology is arguably driving the fastest changes. Technological developments are undoubtedly fuelling many new products and services, and are contributing to the dynamism of financial markets. In particular, high frequency computer-based trading (HFT) has grown in recent years to represent about 30% of equity trading in the UK and possible over 60% in the USA. HFT has many proponents. Its roll-out is contributing to fundamental shifts in market structures being seen across the world and, in turn, these are significantly affecting the fortunes of many market participants. But the relentless rise of HFT and algorithmic trading (AT) has also attracted considerable controversy and opposition.
  • Wall St. and the Law: Customer Fund Protections After the Collapse of MF Global and Peregrine -- What Regulatory Changes Are Taking Place

    Wall St. and the Law: Customer Fund Protections After the Collapse of MF Global and Peregrine -- What Regulatory Changes Are Taking Place

    E TUT WALL ST. AND THE LAW: I CUSTOMER FUND PROTECTIONS ST AFTER THE COLLApsE OF MF N GLOBAL AND PEREGRINE – WHAT REGULATORY CHANGES ARE TAKING PLACE Prepared in connection with a Continuing Legal Education course presented at New York County Lawyers’ Association, 14 Vesey Street, New York, NY presented on Tuesday, June 18, 2013. P ROGR A M C O - S P O N SOR : New York Law (NYLS) School Financial Services Law Institute P ROGR A M M OD E R A TOR : Prof. Ronald H. Filler, NYLS Professor of Law and, Director, Financial Services Law Institute, NYLS P ROGR A M F ac U L T Y : Steven Lofchie, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft; Robert L. Sichel, Pacific Global Advisors; Gary DeWaal , Gary DeWaal & Associates (former Group General Counsel of Newedge) NYCLA-CLE I 2 TRANSITIONAL & NON-TRANSITIONAL MCLE CREDITS: This course has been approved in accordance with the requirements of the New York State Continuing Legal Education Board for a maximum of 2 Transitional & Non-Transitional credit hours: .5 Ethics; 1.5 PP This program has been approved by the Board of Continuing Legal Education of the Supreme Court of New Jersey for 2 hours of total CLE credit. Of these, 0 qualify as hours of credit for Ethics/Professionalism, and 0 qualify as hours of credit toward certification in civil trial law, criminal trial law, workers compensation law and/or matrimonial law. Information Regarding CLE Credits and Certification Wall Street and the Law June 18, 2013; 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM The New York State CLE Board Regulations require all accredited CLE providers to provide documentation that CLE course attendees are, in fact, present during the course.
  • Banking Policy Issues in the 115Th Congress

    Banking Policy Issues in the 115Th Congress

    Banking Policy Issues in the 115th Congress David W. Perkins Analyst in Macroeconomic Policy March 7, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44855 Banking Policy Issues in the 115th Congress Summary The financial crisis and the ensuing legislative and regulatory responses greatly affected the banking industry. Many new regulations—mandated or authorized by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (P.L. 111-203) or promulgated under the authority of bank regulators—have been implemented in recent years. In addition, economic and technological trends continue to affect banks. As a result, Congress is faced with many issues related to the bank industry, including issues concerning prudential regulation, consumer protection, “too big to fail” (TBTF) banks, community banks, regulatory agency design and independence, and market and economic trends. For example, the Financial CHOICE Act (H.R. 10) and the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (S. 2155) propose wide ranging changes to the financial regulatory system, and include provisions related to many of these banking issues. Prudential Regulation. This type of regulation is designed to ensure banks are safely profitable and unlikely to fail. Regulatory ratio requirements agreed to in the international agreement known as the Basel III Accords and the Volcker Rule are examples. Ratio requirements require banks to hold a certain amount of capital on their balance sheets to better enable them to avoid failure. The Volcker Rule prohibits certain trading activities and affiliations at banks. Proponents argue the rules appropriately balance the need for safety and soundness with regulatory burden.
  • The Clearing House Interbank Payments System: a Description of Its Operation and Risk Management

    The Clearing House Interbank Payments System: a Description of Its Operation and Risk Management

    No. 8910 THE CLEARING HOUSE INTERBANK PAYMENTS SYSTEM: A DESCRIPTION OF ITS OPERATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT by Robert T. Clair* Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas June 1989 Research Paper Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas This publication was digitized and made available by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas' Historical Library ([email protected]) t No. 8910 THE CLEARIIIGHOUSE IIITERBAIIK PAYI,IEI{TS SYSTEII: A DTSCRIPTIOXOF ITS OPERATIOI{AND RISKI.IA}IAGEI{II{T by Robert T. Clair* Federal ReserveBank of Dallas Jurn 198!l * Theviews expressed .in this article are solely thoseof the authorand shouldnot be attributed to the FederalReserve Bank of Dallas. or the FederalReserve System. The Clearing HouseInterbank Payments System: Descriptionof Its 0perationsand Risk Manaqement 1. General0vervjew of the System The Clearing HouseInterbank Payment Systenr (CHIPS) is a high-speed message-s\4itchingnetwork owned and operatedby the Newyork Clearing House Assoc'iation(NYCHA) to clear jnternationaldollar payments.Based 'in Newyork Cit.y, CHIPSwas developed in the late 1960sas an e'lectronic replacementfor a paper-basedpayment system, the PaperExchange Payment System (PEPS), PEPSprovided an effective clearjng arrangementbut the paper-based strtrcturewas unable to handlethe rapidly growingvolume of paynentsthat neededto be cleared. Thegrowth in paymentvolume was partial'iy the resu'lt of the growthof the Eurodollarmarket.l Thechange in foreign exchangerate r For a discussionof the causesfor the surge in the Eurodollar market,see Sarkjs J. Khoury,Dynamics of I nternati ona'lBank ing, Praeger1980,p.24-6. regine from fjxed to floating rates jn lg73 also ljkely jncreasedthe volumeof internationa.l paymentsthat neededto be cleared. In responseto the growingvolurne of internationdl paymentsthe NYCHA developedthe ClearingHouse Interbank Payments System (CHIPS).
  • The Political Economy of Argentina's Abandonment

    The Political Economy of Argentina's Abandonment

    Going through the labyrinth: the political economy of Argentina’s abandonment of the gold standard (1929-1933) Pablo Gerchunoff and José Luis Machinea ABSTRACT This article is the short but crucial history of four years of transition in a monetary and exchange-rate regime that culminated in 1933 with the final abandonment of the gold standard in Argentina. That process involved decisions made at critical junctures at which the government authorities had little time to deliberate and against which they had no analytical arsenal, no technical certainties and few political convictions. The objective of this study is to analyse those “decisions” at seven milestone moments, from the external shock of 1929 to the submission to Congress of a bill for the creation of the central bank and a currency control regime characterized by multiple exchange rates. The new regime that this reordering of the Argentine economy implied would remain in place, in one form or another, for at least a quarter of a century. KEYWORDS Monetary policy, gold standard, economic history, Argentina JEL CLASSIFICATION E42, F4, N1 AUTHORS Pablo Gerchunoff is a professor at the Department of History, Torcuato Di Tella University, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [email protected] José Luis Machinea is a professor at the Department of Economics, Torcuato Di Tella University, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [email protected] 104 CEPAL REVIEW 117 • DECEMBER 2015 I Introduction This is not a comprehensive history of the 1930s —of and, if they are, they might well be convinced that the economic policy regarding State functions and the entrance is the exit: in other words, that the way out is production apparatus— or of the resulting structural to return to the gold standard.
  • Ai: Understanding and Harnessing the Potential Wireless & Digital Services Ai: Understanding and Harnessing the Potential White Paper

    Ai: Understanding and Harnessing the Potential Wireless & Digital Services Ai: Understanding and Harnessing the Potential White Paper

    AI: UNDERSTANDING AND HARNESSING THE POTENTIAL WIRELESS & DIGITAL SERVICES AI: UNDERSTANDING AND HARNESSING THE POTENTIAL WHITE PAPER CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................................................02 1. THE PRODUCTIVITY CONUNDRUM: WILL AI HELP US BREAK INTO A NEW CYCLE? ...........................................................05 1.1 Global productivity growth is faltering ...................................................................................................... 05 1.2 AI has the potential to drive productivity improvements and hence economic growth .................................... 06 2. AI FUTURES ........................................................................................................................................................................11 2.1 Replacing the smartphone with a ubiquitous voice assistant ....................................................................... 11 2.2 Your AI powered personal digital assistant ............................................................................................... 12 2.3 Is AI the missing piece for a truly smart city? ........................................................................................... 14 2.4 City of the future ................................................................................................................................... 16 2.5 Giving medics more time to care ............................................................................................................
  • Florida Billionaires Got $28 Billion Richer Over First 10 Months of Pandemic, Their Collective Wealth Jumping by 16%

    Florida Billionaires Got $28 Billion Richer Over First 10 Months of Pandemic, Their Collective Wealth Jumping by 16%

    February 15, 2021 Florida Billionaires Got $28 Billion Richer Over First 10 Months of Pandemic, Their Collective Wealth Jumping By 16% Gains of 59 Richest Residents Could Cover State’s $3 Billion Budget Shortfall Eight Times Over & Still Leave Billionaires as Rich as They Were Before COVID Tallahassee, Florida—The collective wealth of Florida’s 59 billionaires jumped by $28.4 billion, or 15.5%, between mid‐March of last year and Jan. 29 of this year, according to a new report by Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) and Health Care for America Now (HCAN). The data was released today by state advocates from the Florida Center for Fiscal and Economic Policy, the Florida Alliance for Retired Americans (FLARA), the Black Women’s Roundtable (BWR) and local and state elected leaders. Between March 18—the rough start date of the pandemic shutdown, when most federal and state economic restrictions were put in place—and Jan. 29, the total net worth of Florida billionaires rose from $183.2 billion to $213.3 billion, based on this analysis of Forbes data and also shown in the table below.1 (The increase in total billionaire wealth from March to January was $30 billion, but is adjusted to $28 billion because two billionaires were new to the list in January 2021 and one dropped off.) The $28 billion in pandemic profits of the state’s richest residents could cover the state’s $3 billion budget gap many times over and still leave them as wealthy as they were when the pandemic hit 10 months ago.
  • Circuit Breakers and New Market Structure Realities

    Circuit Breakers and New Market Structure Realities

    Circuit Breakers and New Market Structure Realities China’s dramatic and short-lived But there are questions about whether regulators have been able to keep up with today’s high-speed markets, with one experience with market circuit trader likening them to police on bicycles trying to catch breakers at the start of the New Year Ferraris.1 Regulators themselves have admitted as much. Testifying before the US Senate Committee on Banking after has revived debate about whether the Flash Crash of 2010, former SEC Chairwoman Mary such market interventions do more Schapiro said: “One of the challenges that we face in recreating the events of May 6 is the reality that the technologies used for harm than good, as regulators and market oversight and surveillance have not kept pace with the market participants around the world technology and trading patterns of the rapidly evolving and expanding securities markets.”2 continue to grapple with new market In response, a growing number of equity and equity-related structure realities and the law of markets (e.g., futures and listed options) around the world have introduced circuit breakers in the form of stock-specific and unintended consequences. market-wide trading halts as well as price limit bands in order to stabilize markets when, as the SEC has said, “severe market While many developments in modern equity markets have price declines reach levels that may exhaust market liquidity.”3 benefited investors in the form of greater efficiency and lower The 10 largest (by value traded) equity markets around the costs, they have also led to highly complex and fragmented world have already implemented or are planning to introduce markets.