DOCSLIB.ORG

Humidicutis Lewellinae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Humidicutis Lewellinae Humidicutis arcohastata Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. About 2-4cm diam., conical to broadly conical then flat. Deep olive green becoming orange or orange-red. Margin yellow tinted. Can be mistaken for Hygrocybe aurantipes. Gills. Adnate, thick, greenish yellow, becoming orange tinted. Sore print. White Stipe. About 2-4cm, cylindrical 2-4mm pale green/mauve to orange toward base. Habitat. Caespitose among moss and leaf litter Humidicutis ( Porpolomopsis) lewellinae Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Pale violet with a darker umbo. Convex to expanded. The margins split irregularly along the axis of the gills. Gills. Concolorous with the cap, paler near the stem. Moderately close and waxy. Adnexed to almost free. Spore print. White. Stipe. Concolorous with the cap, paler at the base, smooth, hollow. Habitat. On damp soil. Humidicutis helicoides Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Diam. 3.5cm., convex slightly umbonate, dark olive green. Gills. Adnate, lime green. Stipe. Cylindrical, smooth, hollow, pale green. Spore print. White. Habitat. On soil in leaf litter. Humidicutis taekeri Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Olive green, 2.5 cm diameter, convex. Gills. Deep orange, adnate. Spore print. White. Stipe. Pale green, long and relatively thick. Habitat. On damp soil in the rainforest. Humidicutis mavis Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. All white, convex to upturned with a slight umbo, moist, margin splitting along axis of the gill. Gills. White, distant Spore print. White. Stipe. Long, white, cylindrical, no ring. Habitat. On soil in moist forest. Hygrocybe apricosa Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Orange, conical, moist. Gills. Orange. Spore print. White. Stipe. Long, cylindrical orange. Habitat. On damp soil. Hygrocybe astatogala Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Conical, tones of orange, red or yellow, with black fibrils, the cap becoming black with age. Gills. Cream, becoming dark with age. Spore print. White. Stipe. Yellowish with overlying black fibrils. Habitat. On moist soil. Hygrocybe aurantiopallens Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Convex, pale golden colour Gills. Same as cap. Spore print. White. Stipe. Concolorous with the cap. Habitat. On moist soil Hygrocybe aurantipes Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Broad, expanded at the margins, yellow becoming darkened. Gills. Distant, sinuate, with lamellulae near the margin, yellow. Spore print. White. Stipe. Yellow to pale orange. Habitat. On soil. Hygrocybe chromolimonea Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Small convex, diam.1- 2 cm, viscid, bright yellow, margin slightly inrolled. Gills. Yellow same as cap, decurrent distant. Viscid gill margins. Stipe. Concolorous with the cap, viscid, relatively long and slender. Spore print. White. Habitat. On soil in rainforest. Hygrocybe bolensis Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Convex, then irregularly convex, radially fibrillose, brilliant scarlet red. Diam. 2.0 cm. Gills. Decurrent, thick, pale orange. Stipe. First velvety, cylindrical, hollow, orange-bright red. Spore print. White. Habitat. Occurs caespitose in soil among leaf litter Hygrocybe cantharellus Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Convex or plano-convex, diam.- 2.2cm, fine velvety, slightly fibrillose, brilliant orange-red. Gills. Deeply decurrent, white-pale cream. Stipe. Cylindrical, red-bright orange, yellowish at base. Spore print. White. Habitat. Grows in moss, soil among leaf litter and privet. Hygrocybe collucera Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Conico-convex, diam 2cm., smooth and finely fibrillose, bright scarlet. Gills. Arcuate to deeply decurrent, brilliant yellow. Stipe. Cylindrical, smooth, brilliant scarlet, yellow towards base. Spore print. White. Habitat. Caespitose on soil among moss. Hygrocybe erythrocala Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Conical to flattened, red, fading to orange Gills. Cream, with intermediate lamellae . Stem. Somewhat stout, paler than the cap. Spore print. White. Habitat. On soil. Hygrocybe erythrocrenata Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Convex, margin crenulated, red, moist. Diam. 1.5- 2 cm. Gills. Decurrent, distant, gill edges irregular, paler than the cap, intermediate lamellulae. Stipe. Long. thin concolorous with the cap. Spore print. White. Habitat. On soil. Hygrocybe graminicolor Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Convex, approximately 2.5 cm diameter, glutinous and translucent. Gills. White to greenish, margins glutinous. decurrent. Spore print. White. Stipe. Long (7.5 cm), green. viscid Habitat. On soil. Hygrocybe griseoramosa Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Cap 3cm, finally umbonate and upturned, smooth, striate, non-viscid, grey-sepia brown. Gills. Adnate, moderately thick and veined, forked at end of pileal margin, grey. Stipe. Cylindrical, finely fibrillose, pale grey Spore print. White. Habitat. Grows caespitose in soil among leaf litter and moss. Hygrocybe irrigata Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Diam. 3.0 cm., convex, smooth, thickly glutinous, dark brown. Gills. Broadly adnate, white. Stipe. Cylindrical, smooth, thickly glutinous, dark brown. Spore print. White. Habitat. On soil among moss and leaf litter Hygrocybe kula Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Convex, then depressed, red-dark orange. Gills. Deeply decurrent, cream coloured. Stipe. Cylindrical, red tapering to yellow-orange at base. Spore print. White. Habitat. On soil among grass and leaf litter. Hygrocybe lanecovensis Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Brilliant scarlet, 2.3cm. diam., margin crenulate, convex. Gills. Deeply decurrent, thick, white to off-white with age. Stipe. Cylindrical, smooth to slightly rough, brilliant scarlet. Spore print. White. Habitat. Grows caespitose in soil among moss and leaf litter. Hygrocybe miniata Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Bright red, convex becoming plane, smooth, moist. Gills. White becoming yellowish, decurrent, distant. Spore print. White. Stipe. Concolorous with the cap. Long, slender, hollow. Habitat. Gregarious on the ground, often amongst moss. Hygrocybe pseudograminicolor Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Convex, moist, green to yellowish, ≈ 2.5 cm. Gills. Yellow, close. Stipe. Green. Spore print. White. Habitat. On damp soil. Hygrocybe reesiae Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Convex, with indent in the middle, pale lilac, diam. 1-2 cm. Gills. Concolorous with the cap, decurrent, distant, with short lamellulae. Stipe. Lilac beneath the cap, tan towards the base, moderately stout. Spore print. White. Habitat. On damp soil. Hygrocybe rubronivea Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Convex, crimson, margin slightly crenulate. Gills. Adnate, thick, widely spaced, white to off-white with age. Stipe. Cylindrical, crimson, paling with age, base somewhat tinted yellowish. Spore print. White. Habitat. Grows caespitose on soil, among leaf litter. Hygrocybe stevensoniae Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Diam. to 3 cm, green becoming pinkish with age, glutinous, convex becoming flattened. Gills. White, dry, distant slightly decurrent, with small intermediate gills. Stipe. Green, glutinous relatively slender. Spore print. White. Habitat. On soil. Hygrocybe viscidibrunnea Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Diam. to 4cm, centrally indented, smooth, viscid, orange brown. Gills. Decurrent, thick and tinged light pinkish with a gluten thread. Stipe. To 6cm approx, smooth, viscid, yellowish brown, cylindrical. Spore print. White. Habitat. On soil among leaf litter. Hygrophorus involutus Division Eumycota Subdivision Basidiomycotina Class Homobasidiomycetes Order Agaricales Cap. Convex, with an inrolled margin, cream. Gills. Yellow, close. Stipe. Long slender, cream. Spore print. White. Habitat. On soil. Camarophyllopsis kearneyi Division Basidiomycota Class Agaricomycetes Order Agaricales Family Clavariaceae (genus formerly in Hygrophoraceae) Cap. About 1cm diam., strongly convex, pale brown with darker centre, margin crenulate paler colour towards margin. Gills. Adnate, distant, thick white to greyish white. Stipe. About 1.5-2.7cm and cylindrical (1.5-2.5mm thick). Fine brownish fibrils, dry and solid. Spore print. White. Habitat. Caespitose on mossy soil in sheltered position. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Download
    LITERATURE UPDATE FOR TEXAS FLESHY BASIDIOMYCOTA WITH NEW VOUCHERED RECORDS FOR SOUTHEAST TEXAS David P. Lewis Clark L. Ovrebo N. Jay Justice 262 CR 3062 Department of Biology 16055 Michelle Drive Newton, Texas 75966, U.S.A. University of Central Oklahoma Alexander, Arkansas 72002, U.S.A. [email protected] Edmond, Oklahoma 73034, U.S.A. [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT This is a second paper documenting the literature records for Texas fleshy basidiomycetous fungi and includes both older literature and recently published papers. We report 80 literature articles which include 14 new taxa described from Texas. We also report on 120 new records of fleshy basdiomycetous fungi collected primarily from southeast Texas. RESUMEN Este es un segundo artículo que documenta el registro de nuevas especies de hongos carnosos basidiomicetos, incluyendo artículos antiguos y recientes. Reportamos 80 artículos científicamente relacionados con estas especies que incluyen 14 taxones con holotipos en Texas. Así mismo, reportamos unos 120 nuevos registros de hongos carnosos basidiomicetos recolectados primordialmente en al sureste de Texas. PART I—MYCOLOGICAL LITERATURE ON TEXAS FLESHY BASIDIOMYCOTA Lewis and Ovrebo (2009) previously reported on literature for Texas fleshy Basidiomycota and also listed new vouchered records for Texas of that group. Presented here is an update to the listing which includes literature published since 2009 and also includes older references that we previously had not uncovered. The authors’ primary research interests center around gilled mushrooms and boletes so perhaps the list that follows is most complete for the fungi of these groups. We have, however, attempted to locate references for all fleshy basidio- mycetous fungi.
    [Show full text]
  • OF UKRAINE © Chvikov V., Prylutskyi O
    Біорізноманіття, екологія та експериментальна біологія, 2020, №2 MYCOLOGY UDC 582.284 (477) Prylutskyi O. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5730-517X Chvikov V. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-3996 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF HYGROPHORACEAE (AGARICALES, BASIDIOMYCOTA) OF UKRAINE © Chvikov V., Prylutskyi O. V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University [email protected] , [email protected] https://doi.org/10.34142/2708-5848.2020.22.2.01 Hygrophoraceae is a family within Agaricales, which comprises 26 genera and approximately 690 agaricoid species, including ectomycorrhizal, lichen-forming, bryophilous, humus and litter decomposing fungi. Some of these species especially those from genera Cuphophyllus, Hygrocybe, Neohygrocybe and Porpolomopsis are associated with natural grasslands and show extreme sensitivity to the presence of nitrogen-containing fertilizers in their substrate. This makes them indicative species of grasslands of high conservation value. While casual observations of Hygrophoraceae of Ukraine were incorporated in studies of agaricoid fungi as a whole, this family has never been in the focus of special research. Previously accumulated data on the diversity of Hygrophoraceae in Ukraine must be aggregated and revised. We have summarized all available data on the occurrences of Hygrophoraceae in Ukraine, including published papers, open databases, citizen science observations, and the previously unpublished original collection materials. Also, we provide an original description of the rare European species Haasiella venustissima (Fr.) Kotl. & Pouzar ex Chiaffi & Surault, which is reported for the first time from the territory of Ukraine. The resulting checklist of Hygrophoraceae of Ukraine includes 66 species. Leading genera are Hygrophorus (22 species), Hygrocybe (17) and Arrhenia (10); 5 species among them (Hygrocybe punicea, Hyrgocybe splendidissima, Neohygrocybe nitrata, Neohygrocybe ovina, Porpolomopsis calyptriformis) are threatened and according to “IUCN Red List” considered “Vulnerable”.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota
    Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycological Notes 38 Residual Tricholomatineae
    Mycological Notes 38 Residual Tricholomatineae Jerry Cooper, June 18th 2018 My recent ‘Mycological Notes’ on various families of New Zealand agarics are preliminary treatments intended as an outline of described/undescribed species. Hopefully they will eventually be followed by more complete and formal treatments, including the description of the new species. That process will take some time. They are based on preliminary notes on recent collections, sequence data and phylogenetic analysis in the context of what we already know about mushrooms in New Zealand, which is quite limited. These notes have an audience in mind. They are semi- technical, in the sense that a user is expected to have some existing knowledge, access to a microscope, stains, and some literature. I realise that approach excludes most potential end-users who just want to identify observations/collections, and for whom such notes provide little more than a few named photos. However, the notes and the subsequent detailed technical publications, are a necessary pre-requisite in a longer process. We need many collections to be accurately named (and probably sequenced) by the few with the necessary technical skills. A range of collections is necessary to establish the morphological, ecological and geographical boundaries of a species. However, for mushrooms, getting the right collections means the skilled people need to be in the right place and at the right time. There’s more chance of winning lotto. Too often in the past (and even currently) new species are described based on one or two collections, which may prove to be atypical, and/or without sequence data to ‘pin them down’, or without sufficient morphological characterisation to separate them from superficially similar species.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire) Using Nextgen DNA Sequencing of Soil Samples
    Natural England Commissioned Report NECR258 An assessment of the fungal conservation value of Hardcastle Crags (Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire) using NextGen DNA sequencing of soil samples First published February 2019 Month XXXX www.gov.uk/natural-england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background DNA based applications have the potential to significantly change how we monitor and assess This report should be cited as: biodiversity. These techniques may provide cheaper alternatives to existing species GRIFFITHS, G.W., CAVALLI, O. & monitoring or an ability to detect species that we DETHERIDGE, A.P. 2019. An assessment of the cannot currently detect reliably. fungal conservation value of Hardcastle Crags (Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire) using NextGen Natural England has been supporting the DNA sequencing of soil samples. Natural development of DNA techniques for a number of England Commissioned Reports, Number 258. years and has funded exploratory projects looking at different taxonomic groups in a range of different ecosystems and habitats. This report presents the results of a survey of fungi of conservation importance at Hardcastle . Crags, West Yorkshire, using DNA based methods. These results are compared to fruiting body surveys which had been carried out in the preceding two years. Natural England Project Manager – Andy Nisbet, Principal Adviser and Evidence Programme Manager, Natural England [email protected] Contractor – Gareth Griffith, Aberystwyth University [email protected] Keywords – DNA, eDNA, sequencing, metabarcoding, monitoring, fungi, waxcaps, grassland Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England Access to Evidence Catalogue: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/ .
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Hygrophorus, H. Yadigarii Sp. Nov. (Hygrophoraceae), with an Isolated Systematic Position Within the Genus from the Colchic Part of Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Botany Turk J Bot (2018) 42: 224-232 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/botany/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/bot-1706-64 A new species of Hygrophorus, H. yadigarii sp. nov. (Hygrophoraceae), with an isolated systematic position within the genus from the Colchic part of Turkey 1, 2 3 Ertuğrul SESLİ *, Vladimír ANTONÍN , Marco CONTU 1 Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Education, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey 2 Moravian Museum, Department of Botany, Brno, Czech Republic 3 Via Marmilla, 12 (I-Gioielli 2), I-07026 Olbia (OT), Italy Received: 27.06.2017 Accepted/Published Online: 20.11.2017 Final Version: 20.03.2018 Abstract: Hygrophorus yadigarii (Hygrophoraceae/Basidiomycota) is described as a new species for science based on basidiomata collected from Maçka, Trabzon, Turkey. The new taxon is quite different even from the closest relatives, easily distinguished by the other species because of its grayish to ash-colored, gregarious to subcaespitose, sticky basidioma; a slightly umbonate to depressed pileus; a cylindrical to clavate, grayish stipe; ellipsoid and smooth basidiospores; quite long basidia; clavate, cylindrical or narrowly utriform, apically pyriform or strangulated cheilocystidia; and gelatinous pileipellis. A description with field and micromorphological illustrations, a phylogenetic tree, a simple key, a comparison chart including similar species, and a short discussion are provided. Key words: Colchic, Hygrophorus, Maçka, new species, Trabzon 1. Introduction Sesli and Denchev,
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny, Morphology, Pigment Chemistry and Ecology in Hygrophoraceae (Agaricales)
    Fungal Diversity DOI 10.1007/s13225-013-0259-0 Molecular phylogeny, morphology, pigment chemistry and ecology in Hygrophoraceae (Agaricales) D. Jean Lodge & Mahajabeen Padamsee & P. Brandon Matheny & M. Catherine Aime & Sharon A. Cantrell & David Boertmann & Alexander Kovalenko & Alfredo Vizzini & Bryn T. M. Dentinger & Paul M. Kirk & A. Martyn Ainsworth & Jean-Marc Moncalvo & Rytas Vilgalys & Ellen Larsson & Robert Lücking & Gareth W. Griffith & Matthew E. Smith & Lorelei L. Norvell & Dennis E. Desjardin & Scott A. Redhead & Clark L. Ovrebo & Edgar B. Lickey & Enrico Ercole & Karen W. Hughes & Régis Courtecuisse & Anthony Young & Manfred Binder & Andrew M. Minnis & Daniel L. Lindner & Beatriz Ortiz-Santana & John Haight & Thomas Læssøe & Timothy J. Baroni & József Geml & Tsutomu Hattori Received: 17 April 2013 /Accepted: 17 July 2013 # The Author(s) 2013. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Molecular phylogenies using 1–4 gene regions and here in the Hygrophoraceae based on these and previous anal- information on ecology, morphology and pigment chemistry yses are: Acantholichen, Ampulloclitocybe, Arrhenia, were used in a partial revision of the agaric family Hygro- Cantharellula, Cantharocybe, Chromosera, Chrysomphalina, phoraceae. The phylogenetically supported genera we recognize Cora, Corella, Cuphophyllus, Cyphellostereum, Dictyonema, The Forest Products Laboratory in Madison, WI is maintained in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin and the laboratory in Puerto Rico is maintained in cooperation with the USDA Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry. This article was written and prepared by US government employees on official time and is therefore in the public domain and not subject to copyright. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13225-013-0259-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewers and Editors Adhere to These Guidelines
    Six simple guidelines for introducing new genera of MYCOLENS fungi Else C. Vellinga1, Thomas W. Kuyper2, Joe Ammirati3, Dennis E. Desjardin4, Roy E. Halling5, Alfredo Justo6, Thomas Læssøe7, Teresa Lebel8, D. Jean Lodge9, P. Brandon Matheny10, Andrew S. Methven11, Pierre-Arthur Moreau12, Gregory M. Mueller13, Machiel E. Noordeloos14, Jorinde Nuytinck14, Clark L. Ovrebo15, and Annemieke Verbeken16 1 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3102, USA; corresponding author e-mail: ecvellinga@comcast. net 2 Department of Soil Quality, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands; corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1800, USA 4 Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA 5 Institute of Systematic Botany, New York Botanical Garden, 2900 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10458, USA 6 Department of Botany, Institute of Biology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, 04510 Mexico City, Mexico 7 Department of Biology/Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark 8 Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Birdwood Ave, Melbourne 3004, Australia 9 Center for Forest Mycology Research, Northern Research Station, USDA-Forest Service, Luquillo, PR 00773-1377, USA 10 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1610, USA 11 Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IL 61920, USA 12 Département des Sciences Végétales et Fongiques, Faculté des sciences pharmaceutiques et biologiques, Université de Lille, 59006 Lille, France 13 Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road, Glencoe, IL 60022, USA 14 Naturalis Biodiversity Centre, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Hygrocybeae Community of Lane Cove
    NSW SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Preliminary Determination The Scientific Committee, established by the Threatened Species Conservation Act, has made a Preliminary Determination to support a proposal to list the Hygrocybeae community of Lane Cove Bushland Park in the Sydney Basin Bioregion, as a CRITICALLY ENDANGERED ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY in Part 2 of Schedule 1A of the Act, and as a consequence, to omit reference to the Hygrocybeae community of Lane Cove Bushland Park from Part 3 of Schedule 1 (Endangered Ecological Community) of the Act. Listing of Critically Endangered Ecological Communities is provided for by Part 2 of the Act. The Scientific Committee has found that: 1. The Hygrocybeae community of Lane Cove Bushland Park in the Sydney Basin Bioregion is the name given to the ecological community characterised by the species assemblage of macrofungi listed in paragraph 2. This Bioregion is defined by SEWPaC (2012) Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia, Version 7. A map of IBRA 7 is available at: http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/parks/nrs/science/bioregion- framework/ibra/maps.html 2. The Hygrocybeae community of Lane Cove Bushland Park in the Sydney Basin Bioregion is characterised by the assemblage of macrofungi in the tribe Hygrocybeae (Fungi, Basidiomycota, Agaricales, Hygrophoraceae) listed below. Camarophyllopsis kearneyi Humidicutis lewelliniae Hygrocybe anomala var. ianthinomarginata Hygrocybe arcohastata Hygrocybe astatogala Hygrocybe aurantiopallens Hygrocybe aurantipes Hygrocybe austropratensis Hygrocybe bolensis Hygrocybe cantharellus Hygrocybe cheelii Hygrocybe chromolimonea Hygrocybe collucera Hygrocybe erythrocala Hygrocybe erythrocrenata Hygrocybe helicoides Hygrocybe graminicolor Hygrocybe involutus Hygrocybe griseoramosa Hygrocybe kula Hygrocybe irrigata Hygrocybe lanecovensis Hygrocybe mavis Hygrocybe miniata Hygrocybe reesiae Hygrocybe rubronivea Hygrocybe stevensoniae Hygrocybe taekeri Hygrocybe virginea Hygrocybe viscidibrunea 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth and Fate of New Generic Names
    THE BIRTH AND FATE OF NEW GENERIC NAMES D Jean Lodge & Andrus Voitk No student of natural history can have escaped the proliferation of new names in the last few decades, certainly evident in mycology. Of course, the most obvious need for a new name comes about when an organism is discovered whose existence was hitherto unknown, i.e. a species, genus, or larger group new to science. However, for the layman the sudden profusion of new names for seemingly old organisms or groups of organisms is causing some confusion and consternation, particularly when several names replace a former single name. In this discussion we shall use genera as an example to show how new names (new genera) come about and what happens to them after introduction. In order to understand the organisms aside). Phylogeny supported Harmaja’s one, new branches appear. Signifi cantly with which we share this world, we observations, lending more weight to divergent new branches may be have tried to classify them, putting his decision to consider them different considered separate entities and given like with like in the belief that likeness genera. Hence, it is likely that more a new genus name, or they might be indicates relatedness. It follows that taxonomists will accept the derived recognized at a lower rank such as when we fi nd consistent differences genus Cystodermella. If its use becomes subgenus or section. A prolifi c amount between organisms, in order to accepted practice, Cystodermella will be of molecular genetic investigation keep like with like we also separate considered a good genus in the sense is discovering much unsuspected out differing groups.
    [Show full text]
  • MYCOTAXON Volume LXXXIII, Pp
    MYCOTAXON Volume LXXXIII, pp. 19-57 July-September 2002 PHYLOGENY OF AGARICS: PARTIAL SYSTEMATICS SOLUTIONS FOR CORE OMPHALINOID GENERA IN THE AGARICALES (EUAGARlCS) Scott A. Redhead Systematic Mycology and Botany Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre Research Branch. Agriculture and Agri-food Ottawa. Ontario. Canada. KIA OC6 and Fran90is Lutzoni, Jean-Marc Moncalvo, and Rytas Vilgalys Department ofBiology. Duke University Durham. NC 27708-0338. USA Abstract: The taxonomy of species previously assigned to Ompha/ina sensu lato or Clitocybe is reevaluated in light ofrecent molecularly-based phylogenetic hypotheses. Nomenclatural complications involving generic and specific names, lectotypifications and changes to the Code are analysed. Lichenompha/ia gen. noy. (type Hygrophorus hudsonianus, syn. Ompha/ina hudsoniana) is proposed for Jichenized fonner omphalinas. Ampulloc/itocybe gen. noy. (type Agaricus c1avipes, syn. ClilOcyhe c1avipes) is erected for its type species. Arrhenia is emended to include greyish species fonnerly included in Omphalina, but excluding reddish brown species related to Ompha/ina pyxidata, the conserved lectotype for Omphalina. The genera Cantharellula, Chrysomphalina, Cerronema, Clabrocyphella, Gliophorus, Haasiella, Hygrophorus, Hygrocybe, Pseuduarmillariella, and Rickenella, and the generic names Botrydina, Coriscium, Leptoglossum, Phaeotellus, Phytocunis, and Semiomphalina are discussed. 20 Key words: basidiolichen, Ampulloclitocybe,Arrhenia, Lichenomphalia, Omphalina, Gerronema. Introduction As noted in the accompanying article on omphalinoid mushrooms that may have evolved outside ofthe Agaricales (Redhead et ai, 2002), the omphalinoid and clitocyboid habits represent simple agaric morphologies that presumably arose multiple times. This hypothesis is well-supported by analyses that distantly separate several omphalinoid clades, including a lineage encompassing Rickenella Raithelh., possibly outside ofthe Agaricales (Moncalvo et al. 2000 & 2002; Redhead et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Basidiomycota, Hygrophoraceae) from China
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal MycoKeys 38:Additions 59–76 (2018) to tribe Chromosereae (Basidiomycota, Hygrophoraceae) from China... 59 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.38.25427 RESEARCH ARTICLE MycoKeys http://mycokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Additions to tribe Chromosereae (Basidiomycota, Hygrophoraceae) from China, including Sinohygrocybe gen. nov. and a first report of Gloioxanthomyces nitidus Chao-Qun Wang1, Ming Zhang1, Tai-Hui Li1, Xi-Shen Liang1, Ya-Heng Shen1 1State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Mi- crobial Culture Collection and Application, Guangdong Open Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangzhou 510070, China Corresponding author: Tai-Hui Li ([email protected]) Academic editor: B. Dentinger | Received 2 April 2018 | Accepted 2 August 2018 | Published 28 August 2018 Citation: Wang C-Q, Zhang M, Li T-H, Liang X-S, Shen Y-H (2018) Additions to tribe Chromosereae (Basidiomycota, Hygrophoraceae) from China, including Sinohygrocybe gen. nov. and a first report of Gloioxanthomyces nitidus. MycoKeys 38: 59–76. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.38.25427 Abstract Sinohygrocybe gen. nov., typified byS. tomentosipes sp. nov., is described upon morphological and mo- lecular evidence. The new genus is characterised by its sinuate to subdecurrent or short deccurent, usually furcate and interveined and relatively distant lamellae, dry and whitish tomentose stipe, thin-walled el- lipsoid to oviod, non-constricted basidiospores and particularly elongated basidia and a ratio of basidi- ospore to basidium length of >5 to 8; it is close to genera Chromosera and Gloioxanthomyces of the tribe Chromosereae, but morphologically differs fromChromosera in less umbilicate basidiomata, tomentose stipe and usually longer basidia and differs from Gloioxanthomyces in more robust basidioma and less glutinous pileus and/or stipe surface.
    [Show full text]