DOCSLIB.ORG

'European Defence Matters' Magazine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'European Defence Matters' Magazine 2019 I ISSUE #17 EUROPEAN DEFENCE MATTERS years supporting 15 European defence CONTENTS LOOKING BACK AT 15 YEARS > Foreword by Federica Mogherini – Head of the Agency 3 > The Birth of an Agency – How it all began 4 > Flashback by Javier Solana – The first Head of the Agency looks back and ahead 6 > Cooperation pioneers, innovators, facilitators – Joint interview with EDA’s former & current Chief Executives 8 MEMBER STATES’ VIEW > Why EDA is the right intergovernmental platform for joint capability prioritisation, planning & development – by Finnish Defence Minister Antti Kaikkonen 14 EDA’S KEY ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE PAST 15 YEARS > Main architect of EU defence capability priorities 17 > Manager of European Defence Research 20 04 © European Council > The European hub for multinational capability development 23 > The military voice and interface for EU policies 26 > Europe’s training pitch for enhanced interoperability 29 > Guardian of coherence among EU defence cooperation tools 32 INDUSTRY TALK > MBDA’s new CEO Eric Béranger shares his views and analyses 35 NATO VIEW > By former NATO Assistant Secretary General for Defence Policy & Planning, Heinrich Brauss 38 PARTNER MESSAGES > Close partners, strong cooperation – Anniversary reflections by some of EDA’s main partners 40 08 OUTLOOK > Quo Vadis, EDA? – An outlook by Dick Zandee 44 Editor-in-Chief CONTACTS Helmut Brüls Elisabeth Schoeffmann Design Head of Media & Communication Simon Smith Associates Helmut Brüls Printing Media & Communication Officer Drukkerij Hendrix NV European Defence Agency Kiezel Kleine-Brogel 55, B-3990 Peer Rue des Drapiers 17-23 Belgium B-1050 Brussels This document is published by EDA in www.eda.europa.eu the interests of exchange of information Contact: [email protected] Front cover image; ©. Other images; EDA, Catalogue number Shutterstock QU-AC-19-001-EN-N ISSN (2433-5511) EDA is a member of the European Military Press Association © European Defence Agency (EDA) June 2019. All rights reserved. The entire contents of this 35 38 publication are protected by copyright. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a © MBDA © MSC retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means: electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EDA. The reproduction of advertisements in this publication does not in any way imply endorsement of their content by EDA. The views We hope this magazine will provide valuable food for thought expressed in the articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policy of EDA. and information about EDA’s work. Should you have comments or recommendations, please get in touch: [email protected] 2 www.eda.europa.eu SPECIAL EDITION: WELCOME EDA 15th Anniversary Foreword by Federica Mogherini, © EEAS Head of the Agency It has been an honour for me to lead the European with the European External Action Service and the Defence Agency in these five years, and up until EU Military Staff. It is also a central operator for its fifteenth birthday. I remember very well my first EU-funded defence activities. The Agency is today in visit to the EDA headquarters. Together with the EDA a unique position to contribute to coherence among leadership and staff, we realised that we shared the the various initiatives, efficiency and a steady focus same goal: to make European cooperation the norm on our capability priorities. – not the exception – on defence matters too. Five years ago, few people imagined how far we would This is why we have worked to strengthen the come. In these years European defence cooperation Agency so that it can be up for the new task. has expanded like never before. And the Agency has The Long Term Review that we initiated led to a been at the core of our work and of all the progress threefold reinforcement of EDA, which was approved we have achieved together. by Defence Ministers in May 2017: the Agency is now recognised as the main intergovernmental When we worked on our Global Strategy for instrument to identify shared priorities at EU foreign and security policy, presented in 2016, we level on defence capability development; it is the called on Member States to make “full use” of the preferred management support structure at EU Agency’s potential. The Strategy set a new level of level for collaborative technology and capability ambition for European cooperation on defence and development; and it is the military interface and acknowledged EDA’s “key role” in developing better central operator for EU-funded defence-related and more interoperable capabilities together. What activities. It will be essential to ensure that EDA happened in the following months and years was always has the means to fulfil such crucial tasks. unprecedented. A range of new initiatives were launched to boost defence cooperation through joint All the progress achieved has only been possible planning among Member States, joint research and because of a strong political will to move forward. development, joint training and action. We harnessed All relevant actors have played their part towards the untapped potential of the Lisbon Treaty, and set a shared goal – from Member States to the up a Permanent Structured Cooperation on defence European Commission and Parliament, in close among Member States (PESCO). We launched a cooperation with the EU Military Committee, the Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD). And EEAS, the EU Military Staff and EDA. The same for the first time, the European Commission created strong determination will be necessary in the years a European Defence Fund (EDF) to incentivise ahead. The choice of “making cooperation the norm” cooperative projects on defence. will have to be confirmed day-by-day with more concrete action. EDA made essential contributions to crafting these initiatives all along the way, and now plays a The Europe of Defence is taking shape. To get there, central role in their implementation. The Agency is the unique expert role of EDA will be even more the secretariat for both CARD and PESCO, together needed in the future than today. EUROPEAN DEFENCE MATTERS I 2019 I Issue #17 3 Flashback 2001-2004 The birth of an Agency Building on previous efforts by the Western European Union (WEU) to boost armaments cooperation, the idea of creating a European agency for defence capability development, research, acquisition and armaments gained decisive traction when, in 2002, it was taken up by the ‘Convention on the Future of Europe’ whose mission was to reflect on the future of Europe and prepare a draft Constitutional Treaty for the EU. Established by EU leaders and chaired by Agency would incorporate, with a European busy preparing the European Council that former French President Giscard d’Estaing, label, closer forms of cooperation which would take place in Thessaloniki in June the Convention set in motion a process already exist in the armaments field 2003. In its final conclusions, this Summit that led to today’s European Defence between certain Member States (OCCAR, confirmed that a new European Defence Agency (EDA), starting with the decision LoI). The Agency should also be tasked Agency was on the agenda and would soon in September 2002 to set up a dedicated with strengthening the industrial and become a reality. “The European Council Working Group on Defence. Chaired by Michel technological base of the defence sector. [...] tasks the appropriate bodies of the Barnier, the group had to investigate “the It should also incorporate the appropriate Council to undertake the necessary actions possibility of setting up an arms agency elements of the cooperation that most towards creating, in the course of 2004, whose tasks (research, development, Member States undertake within the WEAG.” an intergovernmental agency in the field of acquisitions) and operating methods defence capabilities development, research, would have to be studied in detail”, The working group laid out a few ideas acquisition and armaments”, the final acknowledging that “there [is] in fact regarding the way this future Agency could declaration stated. currently no cooperation on armaments at interact with its stakeholders. “All Member Union level”. The idea of a new Agency proved States which so wished could participate The overall objective of the new body was a consensus builder. In its final report, the in the Agency, the composition of which briefly explained: “This Agency, which will group laid out some of the foundations of would not be linked to other, limited forms what would become the EDA we know today, of defence cooperation”, the final report although the final name wasn’t there yet. explained. “Certain Member States could constitute specific groups based on a “The setting up on an intergovernmental commitment to carry out specific projects”, basis of a European Armaments and which could also “be opened up on an ad hoc Strategic Research Agency was supported basis to countries which are not members of by many in the Group”, the report stated. “The the European Union”. Agency’s initial tasks would be to ensure the fulfillment of operational requirements Thessaloniki EU Summit by promoting a policy of harmonised The Convention finished its work in July procurement by the Member States, and to 2003 with the publication of a Draft Treaty © European Commission support research into defence technology, establishing a Constitution for Europe. Michel Barnier, chairman of the Convention’s including military space systems. The Meanwhile, Member States were also Working Group on Defence 4 www.eda.europa.eu EDA ANNIVERSARY: BEGINNING © European Council The decision to create EDA was taken at the Thessaloniki European Council in June 2003 be subject to the Council’s authority and which different people projected different because anything more specific could have open to participation by all Member States, aspirations. By November 2003 it was clear been seen as trying to push the Agency one will aim at developing defence capabilities that the only way out was to establish a way or another.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MUSIS I Ett Svenskt Perspektiv
    MUSIS i ett svenskt perspektiv En ny europeisk satellitbaserad observationskapacitet CHRisteR ANDERssoN, JOHN RYDQVist FOI är en huvudsakligen uppdragsfinansierad myndighet under Försvarsdepartementet. Kärnverksamheten är forskning, metod- och teknikutveckling till nytta för försvar och säkerhet. Organisationen har cirka 1000 anställda varav ungefär 800 är forskare. Detta gör organisationen till Sveriges största forskningsinstitut. FOI ger kunderna tillgång till ledande expertis inom ett stort antal tillämpningsområden såsom säkerhetspolitiska studier och analyser inom försvar och säkerhet, bedömning av olika typer av hot, system för ledning och hantering av kriser, skydd mot och hantering av farliga ämnen, IT-säkerhet och nya sensorers möjligheter. FOI Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut Tel: 08-55 50 30 00 www.foi.se Försvars- och säkerhetssystem Fax: 08-55 50 31 00 FOI-R--2667--SE Användarrapport Försvars- och säkerhetssystem 164 90 Stockholm ISSN 1650-1942 December 2008 Christer Andersson, John Rydqvist MUSIS i ett svenskt perspektiv En ny europeisk satellitbaserad observationskapacitet Illustration av Martin Ek, Eken Produktion, www.eken.nu FOI-R--2667--SE Titel MUSIS i ett svenskt perspektiv Title MUSIS from a Swedish context Rapportnr/Report no FOI-R--2667--SE Rapporttyp Användarrapport Report Type User report Sidor/Pages 71 p Månad/Month December Utgivningsår/Year 2008 ISSN ISSN 1650-1942 Kund/Customer Försvarsmakten Forskningsområde 4. Sensorer och signaturanpassning Programme area 4. Sensors and Low Observables Delområde 44 Rymdteknik Subcategory 44 Space Technology Projektnr/Project no E20609 Godkänd av/Approved by Magnus Oskarsson FOI, Totalförsvarets Forskningsinstitut FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency Försvars- och säkerhetssystem Defence & Security, Systems and Technology 164 90 Stockholm SE-164 90 Stockholm FOI-R--2667--SE Sammanfattning MUltifunctional Space Imaging System eller förkortat MUSIS är ett initiativ till en ny oberoende europeisk satellitbaserad observationskapacitet.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth Progress Report on the Implementation of the Common Set of Proposals Endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017
    Fifth progress report on the implementation of the common set of proposals endorsed by EU and NATO Councils on 6 December 2016 and 5 December 2017 16 June 2020 On 6 December 2016 and on 5 December 2017, EU and NATO Councils endorsed, in parallel processes, a common set of 74 proposals for the implementation of the Joint Declaration signed in Warsaw on 8 July 2016 by the President of the European Council, the President of the European Commission and the Secretary General of NATO. Responding to the taskings by the Ministers of both organizations, regular progress reports on implementation were submitted to the respective Councils in June and December 2017, in June 2018, as well as in June 2019. The present, fifth, report covers the period between June 2019 and June 2020. It elaborates on progress achieved in the implementation of the 74 common proposals by showcasing tangible deliverables in all areas of cooperation. In particular, the following elements can be highlighted: - Political dialogue has further intensified at all levels and settings, including in virtual formats, while maintaining the positive trend of mutual and reciprocal cross-briefings. It remains an essential and indispensable instrument for strengthening mutual understanding, building confidence and ensuring reciprocal transparency vis-à-vis the NATO Allies and the EU Member States, as well as their strong engagement. - The Structured Dialogue on military mobility at staff level continues to contribute to information sharing in the key areas of military requirements, transport infrastructure, transport of dangerous goods, customs and cross border movement permissions. - In the area of strategic communications, cooperation focused on strengthening mutual alerting on disinformation incidents and hostile information activities, as well as improving capacities related to detection, analysis and exposure to disinformation.
    [Show full text]
  • THIRD COUNTRY PARTICIPATION in EU DEFENCE INTEGRATION INITIATIVES: How It Works and How It Is Viewed by EU Member States
    THIRD COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN EU DEFENCE INTEGRATION INITIATIVES: How it works and how it is viewed by EU member states 1 AUTORS Kinga Brudzińska, PhD, Head of Future of Europe Programme, GLOBSEC Policy Institute Marcin Zaborowski, PhD, Lecturer in International Relations at Lazarski University in Warsaw, Poland and a Senior Associate at Visegrad Insight Alena Kudzko, Director, GLOBSEC Policy Institute DATE October 2020 PROJECT This report is part of the project Enhanced European Opportunity Partners in the EU’s Defence and Security Initia- tives: Study case of Norway, funded by the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Defence. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Since 2014 European defence cooperation has made unprecedented and unexpected progress. The European Union (EU) has become more active in leveraging its tools to strengthen European defence cooperation. For example, through new EU defence initiatives such as Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO), the European Defence Fund (EDF), Capability Development Plan (CDP) and Coordinated Annual Review of Defence (CARD). However, not all EU Member States have made up their mind, and their views in such areas as the third-party ac- cess of NATO-allies, defence industrial interests, etc. and still being shaped and negotiated. Therefore, if Norway wants to avoid being left out from the EU‘s defence integration dimension (for example from industrial arrange- ments, financial support mechanisms or intellectual property rights), it has to act now to secure itself a meaning- ful third-party access in the European Defence initiatives. The goal of this project to understand the potential risks and opportunities in the area of defence for Europe and the its implications for Norwegian security and defence policy.
    [Show full text]
  • European Defence: Where Is It Heading?
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 8216, updated 30 October 2019 EU defence: where is it By Claire Mills heading? Contents: 1. Background 2. 2013 - A fresh impetus for CSDP 3. Making progress on CSDP 4. The Brexit effect 5. Towards a common European defence? www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 EU defence: where is it heading? Contents Summary 4 1. Background 9 2. 2013 - A fresh impetus for CSDP 11 2.1 Conclusions of the 2013 European Council summit 11 3. Making progress on CSDP 14 3.1 Security and Defence Implementation Plan 14 EU Battlegroups 15 Operational planning 16 Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) 19 Co-ordinated Annual Review of Defence (CARD) 25 European Peace Facility 27 3.2 Enhanced EU-NATO Co-operation 28 3.3 European Defence Industry 30 Defence Action Plan and the European Defence Fund 31 4. The Brexit effect 38 4.1 What sort of relationship do both sides want? 39 Political Declaration on the Framework for Future Relations 39 4.2 What if the UK leaves the EU with no deal? 42 5. Towards a common European defence? 45 5.1 Integrationist voices 45 5.2 Is further evolution of CSDP likely? 47 3 Commons Library Briefing, updated 30 October 2019 Cover page image copyright: RN Type 45 Destroyer HMS Dragon by Defence images / image cropped. Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 Eurofighter Typhoon FGR4 7 by Ronnie MacDonald / image cropped. Licensed under CC BY-2.0 Brexit image and flag image – no attribution required. Licensed under CC0 Creative Commons / images cropped.
    [Show full text]
  • CEOS Newsletter Yukio Haruyama,Chu Ishida, JAXA Team for CEOS EOS Was Formally Established in 1984 As a Cresult of G7 Summit Meetings
    NEWSLETTER 2018 50th Anniversary Edition March No. 50 History of CEOS Newsletter Yukio Haruyama,Chu Ishida, JAXA Team for CEOS EOS was formally established in 1984 as a Cresult of G7 Summit meetings. CEOS Plenary meets on an annual basis with Principals of space agencies and international organizations which are conducting Earth observation activities and undertakes coordination and decisions. CEOS has working groups to address common technical issues; the Working Group on Data (WGD) was established in 1984 (which later evolved to the Working Group on Information Systems and Services (WGISS)) and the Working Group on Calibration/Validation (WGCV) in 1991. The standing CEOS Secretariat was established in 1992 and ESA was responsible for issuing the CEOS Dossier (now known as the CEOS EO Handbook and MIM Database), NASA for the CEOS Annual Report and STA/NASDA for the CEOS Partnership (IGOS-P) and the establishment Surface Topography, Ocean Surface Vector Newsletter. of the IGOS Partnership to promote discussion Winds, Ocean Color Radiometry, Sea Surface The CEOS Newsletter has been issued to provide with space segment of G3OS (GCOS, Temperature, and Atmospheric Composition. latest status and major activities of CEOS to Earth GOOS, GTOS) by G3OS and its sponsoring - In addition to the Virtual Constellations, CEOS observation communities, policy makers and international organizations (FAO, ICSU, contributes to GEO-SBAs, Flagships and other stakeholders. Contents of the Newsletter UNESCO-IOC, WMO, IGBP, IGFA, UNEP, Initiatives. CEOS coordinate global observation are coordinated within the CEOS Secretariat. The WCRP) and CEOS was agreed. The first strategies for the Global Forest Observations first CEOS Newsletter was issued in summer IGOS-P meeting was held in June 1998 in Initiative (GFOI), Global Agriculture Monitoring 1993 and issued twice a year.
    [Show full text]
  • European Defence Economy Affected by the Crisis Europe.Visions 7
    EEuurrooppee..VViissiioonnss 77 ______________________________________________________________________ European Defence Economy Affected by the Crisis ______________________________________________________________________ Olivier Jehin November 2010 . Ifri-Bruxelles The Institut français des relations internationals (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non- governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 978-2-86592-793-7 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2010 IFRI IFRI-BRUXELLES 27, RUE DE LA PROCESSION RUE MARIE-THERESE, 21 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15 – FRANCE 1000 – BRUXELLES – BELGIQUE Tel: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 Tel: +32 (0)2 238 51 10 Fax: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Fax: +32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] WEBSITE: Ifri.org Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 2 LACKLUSTRE
    [Show full text]
  • European Defence Fund (EDF) with a the PADR Was Handed Over to the European Financial Volume Of€ 13 Billion for the Period Defence Agency
    FEBRUARY 2021 European Defence Fund Alert Clingendael The real test is yet to come Dick Zandee © Shutterstock The European Commission’s proposal of successful so far. The initial pilot phase is November 2016 to establish a European approaching its end, although the delivery Defence Fund (EDF) was characterised by of results will take a few more years. Do the many commentators as a game changer. results match expectations? This year the After all, investing in defence had always fully-fledged EDF will start for a period of been a taboo in the European Union. seven years with a larger amount of money The Juncker Commission took the initiative in the pot: € 8 billion. What are the prospects to break with the past. The acceptance of the and which criteria have to be met in order to proposal by the member states and by the guarantee the EDF’s success? majority of the European Parliament showed that times had changed. Launching the Fund is part of the wider process of the European Launching the EDF Union’s search for its geopolitical role and strengthening its security and defence policy. In the past, the European Commission More than four years later, a question to made several attempts to break defence be asked is whether the Fund has been companies’ chains of national protection. Clingendael Alert Governments in European capitals relied connected to conditions for cooperating in on the EU Treaty’s clause exempting the multinational consortiums of technology defence industry from the common market institutes and defence industries. In other rules.1 The perpetuum mobile of national words: by using the Fund, participants are demand to supply cycles has resulted in forced to establish cross-border cooperation industrial fragmentation, intra-European formats, consisting of at least three different duplication and a waste of money.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe of Defence in the New World (Dis)Order: Choices for Italy
    Europe of Defence in the New World (Dis)Order: Choices for Italy © 2020 IAI by Ester Sabatino and Alessandro Marrone ISSN 2280-6164 ABSTRACT The 2016 EU Global Strategy delineated the level of ambition of the Union, but four years later the EU still struggles to reach this level in the defence domain. The paper investigates how the current EU initiatives such as Permanent Structured Cooperation and European Defence Fund could help defining and reaching such a concept, to eventually realise an appropriate level strategic autonomy. In light of the principle of the “single set of forces”, as well as due to synergies and commonalities between EU and NATO, the paper also inquires whether the old vertical “division of labour” discussed in the early 2000s is still a valid approach, or if the EU quest for a wider and stronger strategic autonomy could ultimately bring to a geographical division of responsibilities. However, such an occurrence implies a strong political willingness and commitment towards EU defence, that is now further shaken by the impact of COVID-19 particularly on military budget and capability development. In such a context, Italy needs to clearly position itself in a post-Brexit EU at 27, where the different stances on the level of strategic autonomy and on transatlantic relations need to be balanced in renewed ways – also in light of the new role played by the European Commission. In the end, a new and more solid “centre of gravity” for EU defence in Europe could be established, should Rome manage to fully enter the Franco-German driver for strategic autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Résolution Silencieuse Dans L'observation Spatiale
    Focus Résolution silencieuse dans l’observation spatiale lution (EHR), qui doit être lancé par une fusée Soyouz en mai 2020, orbitera à une altitude de 480 km. C’est le Centre militaire d’observation par satel- lite (CMOS), à la base aérienne 1/92 Bourgogne à Creil, au nord de Paris, et le CNES à Toulouse qui géreront ensemble le système. Le CMOS recevra et hiérarchisera toutes les de- mandes d’images émanant de la France et de ses partenaires (Belgique, Allemagne et Suède ; l’Ita- lie signera courant 2019). Aujourd’hui le Centre gère les demandes d’images (en provenance d’Hélios) de la Grèce, de l’Espagne, et des cinq pays susmentionnés, dont la France. C’est aus- si au CMOS que toutes les images seront cen- Le satellite CSO-2 fournira des images avec un niveau de détail encore jamais atteint par des tralisées avant d’être envoyées aux clients. Une capteurs aériens. fois le système CSO pleinement opérationnel, il y aura en plus de ce Centre principal, 29 unités déployables et 20 fixes. La France a lancé le premier de 3 satellites d’ima- gerie militaires identiques qui, lorsqu’ils attein- dront leur pleine capacité opérationnelle fin 2021, Un niveau de résolution extrêmement remplaceront le système vieillissant Hélios et élevé fourniront quotidiennement 800 images en noir et Les images seront téléchargeables toutes les 90 blanc, couleur et infrarouge (IR) à très haute réso- minutes, au lieu de toutes les 6 heures comme lution, pour le compte des agences européennes c’est le cas actuellement avec Hélios, grâce à la de renseignement militaires et civiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancement Satellite Cso-1
    Mission Reconnaissance DOSSIER DE PRESSE LANCEMENT du SATELLITELancement CSO-1 du SATELLITE CSO-1 « La France a été pionnière de la conquête spatiale. Elle a su, par une coopération exemplaire entre le civil et le militaire, accéder en toute indépendance à l’espace. Elle a réussi à maîtriser l’ensemble des applications clés de télécommunications et d’observation. La France a été le catalyseur de l’Europe de l’espace, qui a fait émerger des acteurs industriels puissants et des projets aussi importants que GALILEO. » Florence Parly, ministre des Armées, discours au Centre national d’études spatiales (CNES), à Toulouse, le 7 septembre 2018 Dossier de presse Lancement du satellite CSO-1 3 TABLE DES MATIÈRES 1 - La politique française spatiale de défense . 6 1.1 – Un nouvel enjeu : la maîtrise de l’espace . 6 1.2 – Le programme spatial militaire français . 6 1.3 – Les moyens consacrés à l’espace dans la LPM 2019-2025 . 6 2 - CSO : l’observation spatiale au cœur des opérations militaires . 8 3 - Le programme MUSIS . 9 3.1 – MUSIS et CSO . 9 3.2 – L’organisation du programme MUSIS . 11 3.3 – Coopération européenne . 12 4 - Le système CSO . 13 4.1 – Les satellites CSO . 14 4.2 – Le Segment sol de mission (SSM) . 14 4.3 – Le Segment sol utilisateur (SSU) . 15 4.4 – L’organisation opérationnelle du système CSO . 16 4.5 – Le lancement du satellite CSO-1 . 17 5 - Industrie, recherche et technologie spatiale . 18 5.1 – La base industrielle et technologique dans le domaine spatial . 18 5.2 – Les enjeux scientifiques et technologiques de l’espace .
    [Show full text]
  • Globsec Nato Adaptation Initiative
    GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE ONE ALLIANCE The Future Tasks of the Adapted Alliance www.globsec.org 2 GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE ONE ALLIANCE The Future Tasks of the Adapted Alliance PRESENTATION FOLDER: COLLECTION OF PAPERS ONE ALLIANCE THE FUTURE TASKS OF THE ADAPTED ALLIANCE The GLOBSEC NATO Adaptation Initiative, led by General (Retd.) John R. Allen, is GLOBSEC’s foremost contribution to debates about the future of the Alliance. Given the substantial changes within the global security environment, GLOBSEC has undertaken a year-long project, following its annual Spring conference and the July NATO Summit in Warsaw, to explore challenges faced by the Alliance in adapting to a very different strategic environment than that of any time since the end of the Cold War. The Initiative integrates policy expertise, institutional knowledge, intellectual rigour and industrial perspectives. It ultimately seeks to provide innovative and thoughtful solutions for the leaders of the Alliance to make NATO more a resilient, responsive and efficient anchor of transatlantic stability. The policy papers published within the GLOBSEC NATO Adaptation Initiative are authored by the Initiative’s Steering Committee members: General (Retd.) John R. Allen, Admiral (Retd.) Giampaolo di Paola, General (Retd.) Wolf Langheld, Professor Julian Lindley-French, Ambassador (Retd.) Tomáš Valášek, Ambassador (Retd.) Alexander Vershbow and other acclaimed authorities from the field of global security and strategy. 4 GLOBSEC NATO ADAPTATION INITIATIVE CREDITS CREDITS GLOBSEC NATO Adaptation Initiative Steering Committee General (Retd.) John R. Allen1, Professor Dr Julian Lindley-French, Admiral (Retd.) Giampaolo Di Paola, General (Retd.) Wolf Langheld, Ambassador (Retd.) Tomáš Valášek, Ambassador (Retd.) Alexander Vershbow Observers and Advisors General (Retd.) Knud Bartels, James Townsend, Dr Michael E.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a Future EU-UK Relationship in Foreign Policy and Defense
    Atlantic Council EUROPE CENTER Toward a Future EU-UK Relationship in Foreign Policy and Defense Co-chairs: General (Ret.) Stéphane Abrial, Sir Peter Westmacott Rapporteur: Olivier-Rémy Bel Atlantic Council EUROPE CENTER The Atlantic Council’s Europe Center conducts research and uses real-time commentary and analysis to guide the actions and strategy of key transatlantic decision-makers on the issues that will shape the future of the transatlantic relationship and convenes US and European leaders through public events and workshops to promote dialogue and to bolster the transatlantic partnership. Toward a Future EU-UK Relationship in Foreign Policy and Defense Co-chairs: General (Ret.) Stéphane Abrial, Sir Peter Westmacott Rapporteur: Olivier-Rémy Bel Task Force Members: Lisa Aronsson, Sophia Besch, Clementine Starling, Anna Wieslander ISBN-13: 978-1-61977-157-4 Cover: Britain’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson meets European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in London, Britain January 8, 2020. REUTERS/Toby Melville This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The au- thors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. February 2021 Toward a Future EU-UK Relationship in Foreign Policy and Defense Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 3 1. Retracing the negotiations to better understand the political space 4 2. Putting foreign policy and defense back on the table 6 2.1. Foreign policy and defense will not return to the forefront by itself 6 2.2.
    [Show full text]