DOCSLIB.ORG

Jami-A-Masjid, Naseby Road, Alum Rock, Birmingham, B8 3HE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jami-A-Masjid, Naseby Road, Alum Rock, Birmingham, B8 3HE Committee Date: 13/06/2013 Application Number: 2013/02399/PA Accepted: 25/04/2013 Application Type: Telecommunications Full PA Target Date: 20/06/2013 Ward: Washwood Heath Jami-a-Masjid, Naseby Road, Alum Rock, Birmingham, B8 3HE Retrospective application for the installation of 2.6 metre high rooftop antenna, 300 mm transmission dish and installation of GRP shroud to conceal lower portion of existing antenna and dish attached to chimney cap. Applicant: Everything Everywhere UK Ltd & H3G UK Ltd c/o Agent Agent: WHP Ponderosa, Scotland Lane, Horsforth, Leeds, LS18 5SI Recommendation Approve Subject To Conditions 1. Proposal 1.1. Planning permission is sought to retain the existing roof-top telecommunications equipment that is attached to the existing chimney breast which was installed in 2007-2008. Planning permission is also sought to provide a GRP shroud in order to conceal the transmission dish and lower portion of the antenna from view. As part of the proposed remedial works, the existing cable tray/conduit and external cabling would be re-routed internally. 1.2. The proposed shroud would be no higher than the existing chimney. The antenna would project around 2.6m above the shroud. The proposed shroud would be made from GRP and would have an external finish that would have a brick appearance. 1.3. The proposal outlines that the existing 300mm transmission dish would also be replaced with a modern 300mm transmission dish relocated to the top of the chimney cap. 1.4. Planning permission is required for the works because they are not classed as permitted development under Part 24 of The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Amendment)(England) Order 2001, due to the fact that they are to be installed on a Grade II Listed Building. 2. Site & Surroundings 2.1 The application premises comprise an early-Victorian (Circa 1825), three-storey building with slate hipped roof. The building was originally built as a dwelling, but was used as a factory until 2000, when the building was sub-divided and the front section (No. 14A) was used as a non-residential place-of-worship (Use Class D1) under the name Jami-A-Masjid. Page 1 of 5 2.2 The building has been Grade II listed since July 1982. The external elevations are stucco and all windows are timber framed with sashes and shallow reveals. There is an elevated garden terrace to the front which has been paved. The original chimney stacks have been capped and truncated. The adjoining Church of Saints Mary and John building on Alum Rock Road is locally listed at Grade C. 2.4 To the rear of the main three-storey buildings is a large brick industrial building with open floor plan at ground floor level with internal mezzanine level offices above. This area is used for vehicle dismantling and parts storage. The surrounding area is predominantly residential in character. 2.5 Shaw Hill School and Nursery is located 75 metres to the south east. Park View School is located 150 metres to the North. Nansen Primary School is located 205 metres to the North. 3. Planning History 3.1. 2013/02042/PA – Listed Building Consent application for the retention of 2.6 metre high roof-top antenna, 300mm transmission dish and installation of GRP shroud to conceal lower portion of existing antenna and dish attached to chimney cap – currently undetermined – to be found elsewhere on this agenda. 3.2. 31.01.2013 - 2012/08429/PA – Listed Building Consent application to upgrade existing roof-top telecommunications equipment to include a full size shroud to conceal existing antenna, replacement of cable tray and repositioning of transmission device – Withdrawn at the request of the applicant. 3.3. Planning Enforcement History 3.4. 2012/1072/ENF - Addition of telecommunications antenna with cabling and trunking, infilling of windows, addition of UPVC framed windows, and erection of a side extension. Property is a Statutorily Listed Building. – Current case held in abeyance pending the outcome of this application. 4. Consultation/PP Responses 4.1. Adjoining occupiers, local schools, ward members and residents associations were consulted. Site and press notices were also displayed. Seven responses were received from local residents. The objections can be summarised as follows: a) The works are an eyesore. b) The occupiers of the building use flashing lights on the exterior of the building during religious festivals. c) The works are harmful to health and are too near to local schools. 4.2. Transportation – No objections. 4.3. Regulatory Services – No objections. 5. Policy Context 5.1. UDP (2005), Draft Birmingham Development Plan, NPPF, Mobile Phone Infrastructure SPD (2008), Grade II Listed. Page 2 of 5 6. Planning Considerations 6.1. The main considerations in the determination of this application are the impact of the proposal on the character of the Listed Building and whether the proposal is in accordance with policies of the Development Plan. 6.2 Policy 3.8 of the UDP identifies the need to protect and enhance what is good in the city's environment and to improve what is less good. 6.3 Policy 8.55 of the adopted UDP states that “in assessing applications for telecommunications equipment, account will be taken of the impact of radio masts, antennae, and ancillary structures on existing landscaping features, buildings, and the outlook from neighbouring properties. Policy 8.55A adds that “the City Council will also seek to encourage telecommunications operators to locate new equipment away from residential areas. 6.4 Siting 6.5 The adopted Telecommunications Development: Mobile Phone Infrastructure SPD (2008) states that locations within or adjacent to the grounds of education or health institutions will only be acceptable where the applicant can demonstrate compliance with the precautionary approach. The SPD also states that roof-top installations on the roofs of existing buildings are preferable to ground-based installations. 6.6 I consider that the siting of the proposed equipment on an existing roof-top, and at the fringe of a residential area, is acceptable. I note that the equipment is not located adjacent to sensitive uses, such as schools. I note that there are three schools within 200 metres of the application site, the nearest being 75 metres to the south east. However, given that these uses are not adjacent to the application site, I do not consider harmful impact to be occurring. 6.7 Design and Appearance 6.8 My Conservation Officer has raised some concerns regarding the retention of the antenna and dish. However, they have been in-situ since 2007/2008 and remedial works are proposed to lessen impact. In order to improve the visual amenity of the building, the dish and lower portion of the antenna would be enclosed by a GRP shroud. The shroud would be no higher than the existing chimney. Also, the existing cable tray / conduit and external cabling would be re-routed internally. An element of antenna would project above the shroud, but this would be relatively insignificant and would not detrimentally impact on the architectural merit or visual amenity of the building or locality. 6.9 I also consider that the height, design and appearance of the proposed shroud would not, subject to matching the appearance of the existing chimney, have an unacceptable impact on either the visual amenity of the locality or the architectural appearance of the listed building. 6.10 I note that unauthorised works have already been undertaken, which have resulted in the cabling and conduit being installed to the exterior of the building. As such, a condition is recommended to require the submitted scheme to be implemented within a period of 3 months. Page 3 of 5 6.11 Health Issues 6.12 Issues relating to health including actual and perceived risks to health are material planning considerations. However, it is the Government's firm view that the planning system is not the place for determining health safeguards in relation to telecommunications equipment and that in its view if a proposed mobile phone station meets the ICNIRP guidelines for public exposure, it should not be necessary for a Local Planning Authority to consider further the health aspects and concerns about them. 6.13 The applicant has declared that the proposal would comply with ICNIRP Public Exposure Guidelines and it is therefore concluded that the proposal is acceptable in terms of public health issues. 7. Conclusion 7.1. The proposal complies with the objectives of the policy context as set out above, and is recommended for approval subject to the attached conditions. 8. Recommendation 8.1. Approved Subject to Conditions. 1 Requires the scheme to be in accordance with the listed approved plans 2 Requires the submission of samples of materials within 1 month and implementation within a period of 3 months from written approval. 3 Requires the proposed works to be carried out in full within a period of 3 months. Reason for Approval 1 Birmingham City Council grants Planning Permission subject to the condition(s) listed below (if appropriate). The reason for granting permission is because the development is in accordance with: Policy 8.55 of the Birmingham Unitary Development Plan 2005; Telecommunications Development : Mobile Phone Infrastructure 2008, which has been adopted as Supplementary Planning Guidance; and the National Planning Policy Framework. Case Officer: Jamie Whitehouse Page 4 of 5 Page 5 of 5 APPENDIX 4 1 88 92 0 6 6 5 118 5 6 5 N 108.9m 3 3 7 GOW 111.1m AN ROAD 7 6 109.2m 5 7 7 7 6 4 7 8 7 9 4 1 4 3 C L 6 I 3 P N S A T S O E N Warehouses B Y 2 R 5 O R A O D A 2 D 7 6 2 Works 6 2 WorksII 4 1 1 3 1 3 6 1 2 Hall 2 8 1 2 2 2 9 5 9 6 2 3 0 6 f y 3 r o 1 1 a n 6 h Ch M c r o 6 s u t J h n i d C a n S a 328 3 0 3 7 0 112.6m 3 1 0 3 5 0 3 1 3 1 1 3 3 340 3 5 0 TCB 3 6 0 5 1 3 3 2 372 5 LB 374 a t l 110.6m S E b u S Garage 105.9m 0 1 4 2 9 6 3 3 7 a 2 3 1 2 a 5 3 Hall 7 3 This map is reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Material with the permission 8of Ordnance Surveyon behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown Copyright.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Postal Sector Council Alternative Sector Name
    POSTAL COUNCIL ALTERNATIVE SECTOR NAME MONTH (DATES) SECTOR BS1 1 Bristol City Council St Nicholas Street, Bristol 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS1 3 Bristol City Council Bond Street, Bristol 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS1 4 Bristol City Council Queen Square, Bristol 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS1 5 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl St. Augustines) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS14 0 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Whitchurch) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS15 1 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Kingswood, Two Mile High) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS16 1 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Stapleton, Hambrook, Frenchay) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS3 1 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Southville, Bedminster) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS3 2 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Bedminster, Ashton Gate, Ashton) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS3 3 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Bedminster (North)) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS3 4 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Bedminster, Totterdown) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS4 2 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Knowle, Totterdown) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS4 3 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Brislington, Totterdown) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS4 4 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl St. Annes Park, Brislington) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS5 8 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl St. George) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS6 5 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl St. Andrews, Montpelier, Cotham) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS6 6 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Redland, Cotham, Durdham Park) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS6 7 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Westbury Park, Redland) 06.07.20-02.08.20 BS7 8 Bristol City Council Bristol (Incl Bishopston,
    [Show full text]
  • Project Champion Review
    Project Champion Review Project Champion Review An independent review of the commissioning, direction, control and oversight of Project Champion; including the information given to, and the involvement of, the community in this project from the initiation of the scheme up to 4 July 2010. The Purpose of this review is to identify areas for organisational learning to ensure that West Midlands Police is more effective in protecting communities and securing their trust and confidence. Sara Thornton QPM Chief Constable 30 September 2010 Not Protectively Marked Foreword There is nothing more important to policing than its legitimacy in the eyes of the public. The concerns of the community need to be a central pre- occupation of policing and transparency needs to be a constant consideration. In the course of this review I have met members of the community and have read the press reports and it is clear that many people feel that their civil liberties have been disregarded. As a consequence, the trust and confidence that they have in the police has been significantly undermined. There is a real opportunity to learn from Project Champion about the damage that can be done to police legitimacy when the police are seen to be acting in a way which prizes expediency over legitimacy. Importantly these lessons need to be learned from a counter terrorism project where the need to maintain public support is even more acute. The review has been completed in a relatively short period of time because of the need to take immediate action to restore confidence. However, this has necessarily limited the extent of my enquiries but hopefully not my conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham City Council
    BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL HODGE HILL DISTRICT COMMITTEE 23 NOVEMBER 2017 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HODGE HILL DISTRICT COMMITTEE HELD ON THURSDAY 23 NOVEMBER 2017 AT 1400 HOURS IN COMMITTEE ROOM 2, COUNCIL HOUSE, VICTORIA SQUARE, BIRMINGHAM PRESENT : - Councillors Uzma Ahmed, John Cotton, Mohammed Aikhlaq, Mohammed Idrees, Majid Mahmood and Fiona Williams ALSO PRESENT :- Mike Davis - Hodge Hill/Erdington District Head Danny Kilbride - Place Manager, Bordesley Green/Hodge Hill Mushtaq Hussain - Place Manager, Washwood Heath Jonathan Davies - Compass Support Mike Hinton - District Parks Manager Helen Bailey - West Midlands Police David Bromley - West Midlands Fire Service Marie Reynolds - Legal and Democratic Services ************************************* NOTICE OF RECORDING 434 The District Committee were advised that the meeting would be webcast for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council’s Internet site and members of the press/public may record and take photographs except where there were confidential or exempt items. _______________________________________________________________ APOLOGIES 435 Apologies were submitted on behalf of Councillors Marje Bridle, Diane Donaldson, Ansar Ali Khan, Mariam Khan, Shafique Shah and Ian Ward for their inability to attend the meeting. ______________________________________________________________________ MINUTES 574 Hodge Hill District Committee – 23 November 2017 436 That the Minutes of the meeting held on 21 September 2017, having been circulated to Members were confirmed as a true and correct record. _____________________________________________________________________ MATTERS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES Camera located on the Corner of St Margaret’s Road Junction and Washwood Heath Road 437 Councillor Mahmood referred to the above-mentioned location and highlighted that rubbish was still being deposited there and although it was being removed fairly swiftly, there was an urgent need to find the offenders and for some firm action taken in addressing this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Pharmacies 2019-07-12
    The list of pharmacies registered to sell PPCs on our behalf is sorted alphabetically in postcode order. 0 NAME PREMISES ADDRESS 1 PREMISES ADDRESS 2 PREMISES ADDRESS 3 PREMISES ADDRESS 4 POSTCODE LLOYDS PHARMACY SAINSBURYS, EVERARD CLOSE ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 2QU BOOTS UK LIMITED 9 ST PETERS STREET ST.ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 3DH FREEMAN GRIEVES LTD 111-113 ST PETERS STREET ST.ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 3ET LLOYDS PHARMACY PARKBURY HOUSE ST PETER ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 3HD IMED PHARMACY 67 HATFIELD ROAD ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 4JE ST ALBANS PHARMACY 197 CELL BARNES LANE ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL1 5PX LLOYDS PHARMACY SAINSBURYS, BARNET ROAD LONDON COLNEY ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL2 1AB LLOYDS PHARMACY 17 RUSSELL AVENUE ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL3 5ES NORMANDY PHARMACY 52 WAVERLEY ROAD ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL3 5PE CROWN PHAMRACY 65 HIGH STREET REDBOURN ST ALBANS HERTFORDSHIRE AL3 7LW MANOR PHARMACY (WHEATHAMPSTEAD) LTD 2 HIGH STREET WHEATHAMPSTEAD HERTFORDSHIRE AL4 8AA BOOTS UK LIMITED 23-25 HIGH STREET HARPENDEN HERTFORDSHIRE AL5 2RU LLOYDS PHARMACY 40 HIGH STREET WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL6 9EQ LLOYDS PHARMACY 84 HALDENS WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 1DD BOOTS UK LIMITED 65 MOORS WALK WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 2BQ BOOTS UK LIMITED 31 COLE GREEN LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 3PP PEARTREE PHARMACY 110 PEARTREE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 3UJ BOOTS UK LIMITED 126 PEARTREE LANE WELWYN GARDEN CITY HERTFORDSHIRE AL7 3XY BOOTS UK LIMITED 31 THE HOWARD CENTRE WELWYN GARDEN
    [Show full text]
  • Religious and Non-Religious Practices and the City
    The Journal of the British Association for the Study of Religions (www.basr.ac.uk) ISSN: 0967-8948 Diskus 13 (2012): 27-48 http://www.basr.ac.uk/diskus/diskus13/KarnerParker.pdf Religious and Non-Religious Practices and the City Christian Karner and David Parker [email protected] ; ABSTRACT: This article explores the complex intersections of religiosity, power and inequality in an inner-city district of Birmingham, England. This deprived area of mainly Muslim residence has been at the forefront of recent debates about social cohesion and is widely portrayed by disparaging outsiders as fostering ‘parallel lives’. Drawing on data from over 100 qualitative interviews with local residents and religious actors, we reveal the manifold, at times contradictory local manifestations of religiosity: as variously reproducing traditional expectations and behaviours and contesting prevailing patterns of stratification; as capable of both entrenching social boundaries and of fostering ‘convivial’, pluralistic co-existence. In wider conceptual terms, we argue for a ‘locality approach’, which acknowledges the importance of religiosity in the area, without reducing all significant social relationships and interactions to it. In particular, we draw on mediated discourse analysis and argue that its distinction between a ‘nexus-’ and a ‘community of practice’ (Scollon 2001) offers much to the sociology of religion in helping to illuminate intra-, inter-, and non-religious discourses and practices, as well as their inter-relationships, unfolding in a locality. Keywords : Birmingham, deprivation, religiosity, localities, mediated discourse analysis * * * In May and June 2012 local and national media ran contrasting religion-related headlines about inner-city areas in east Birmingham.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Report
    BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC REPORT Report to: Licensing Sub Committee B Report of: Interim Assistant Director of Regulation & Enforcement Date of Meeting: Tuesday 30th June 2020 Subject: Licensing Act 2003 Premises Licence – Grant Premises: Anna Off Licence, 38 Bridge Road, Saltley, Birmingham, B8 1TD Ward affected: Alum Rock Contact Officer: Bhapinder Nandhra, Senior Licensing Officer, [email protected] 1. Purpose of report: To consider representations that have been made in respect of an application for a Premises Licence which initially sought to permit the Sale of Alcohol (for consumption off the premises) to operate from 06:00am until 12:00midnight (Monday to Sunday). Premises to remain open to the public from 06:00am until 12:00midnight (Monday to Sunday). After discussions with West Midlands Police, the applicant has agreed to amend the scope of the application and permit the Sale of Alcohol from 06:00am until 11:00pm (Monday to Sunday). 2. Recommendation: To consider the representations that have been made and to determine the application. 3. Brief Summary of Report: An application for a Premises Licence was received 11th May 2020 in respect of Anna Off Licence, 38 Bridge Road, Saltley, Birmingham, B8 1TD. Representations have been received from other persons. 4. Compliance Issues: 4.1 Consistency with relevant Council Policies, Plans or Strategies: The report complies with the City Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy and the Council’s Corporate Plan to improve the standard of all licensed persons, premises and vehicles in the City. 1 5. Relevant background/chronology of key events: Krishnapillai Peraparan applied on 11th May 2020 for the grant of a Premises Licence for Anna Off Licence, 38 Bridge Road, Saltley, Birmingham, B8 1TD.
    [Show full text]
  • European and Asian Mini Market
    BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC REPORT Report to: Licensing Sub Committee B Report of: Interim Assistant Director of Regulation & Enforcement Date of Meeting: Tuesday 4th May 2021 Subject: Licensing Act 2003 Premises Licence – Grant Premises: European and Asian Mini Market, 290 Alum Rock Road, Alum Rock, Birmingham, B8 3DD Ward affected: Alum Rock Contact Officer: Bhapinder Nandhra, Senior Licensing Officer, [email protected] 1. Purpose of report: To consider representations that have been made in respect of an application for a Premises Licence which seeks to permit the Sale of Alcohol (for consumption off the premises) to operate from 08:00am until 11:00pm (Monday to Sunday). Premises to remain open to the public from 08:00am until 11:00pm (Monday to Sunday). 2. Recommendation: To consider the representations that have been made and to determine the application. 3. Brief Summary of Report: An application for a Premises Licence was received on 8th March 2021 in respect of the European and Asian Mini Market, 290 Alum Rock Road, Alum Rock, Birmingham, B8 3DD. Representations have been received from other persons. 4. Compliance Issues: 4.1 Consistency with relevant Council Policies, Plans or Strategies: The report complies with the City Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy and the Council’s Corporate Plan to improve the standard of all licensed persons, premises and vehicles in the City. 1 5. Relevant background/chronology of key events: Nabaz Ali-Pour applied on 8th March 2021 for the grant of a Premises Licence for the European and Asian Mini Market, 290 Alum Rock Road, Alum Rock, Birmingham, B8 3DD.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations for Birmingham City Council
    Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 2 Analysis and draft recommendations 5 Submissions received 5 Electorate figures 6 Council size 6 Warding patterns 7 Detailed wards 9 City centre and surrounding area 9 East of city centre 13 North of city centre 18 South-east of city centre 21 South-west of city centre 26 Sutton Coldfield 30 Conclusions 33 Parish electoral arrangements 33 3 Have your say 35 Appendices A Table A1: Draft recommendations for Birmingham City 37 Council B Submissions received 43 C Glossary and abbreviations 46 Summary Who we are The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) is an independent body set up by Parliament. We are not part of government or any political party. We are accountable to Parliament through a committee of MPs chaired by the Speaker of the House of Commons. Our main role is to carry out electoral reviews of local authorities throughout England. Electoral review An electoral review examines and proposes new electoral arrangements for a local authority. A local authority’s electoral arrangements decide: How many councillors are needed How many wards or electoral divisions should there be, where are their boundaries and what should they be called How many councillors should represent each ward or division Why Birmingham? We are conducting a review of Birmingham City Council following a recommendation by Sir Bob Kerslake (now Lord Kerslake) in his review of the governance and organisational capabilities of Birmingham City Council. That review followed on from concerns about the effectiveness of current operational arrangements in the Council. We subsequently agreed to undertake such a review, stimulated by Kerslake’s objective of improving effective and convenient local government in Birmingham.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    14 bus time schedule & line map 14 Birmingham - Chelmsley Wood via Alum Rock View In Website Mode The 14 bus line (Birmingham - Chelmsley Wood via Alum Rock) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Birmingham: 4:22 AM - 11:54 PM (2) Birmingham Business Park: 4:21 AM - 11:37 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 14 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 14 bus arriving. Direction: Birmingham 14 bus Time Schedule 53 stops Birmingham Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:24 AM - 11:54 PM Monday 12:24 AM - 11:54 PM Bluebell Drive, Birmingham Business Park Tuesday 4:22 AM - 11:54 PM Chiswick Walk, Birmingham Business Park Yorkminster Dr, Birmingham Wednesday 4:22 AM - 11:54 PM Ashwood Drive, Chelmsley Wood Thursday 4:22 AM - 11:54 PM Friday 4:22 AM - 11:54 PM Waterson Croft, Chelmsley Wood Cornƒeld Croft, Birmingham Saturday 4:22 AM - 11:54 PM Woodlands Way, Chelmsley Wood Richmond Way, Chelmsley Wood 14 bus Info Hedgetree Croft, Chelmsley Wood Direction: Birmingham Bream Close, Birmingham Stops: 53 Trip Duration: 46 min Chelmsley Interchange Line Summary: Bluebell Drive, Birmingham Business Chelmsley Circle, Birmingham Park, Chiswick Walk, Birmingham Business Park, Ashwood Drive, Chelmsley Wood, Waterson Croft, Winchester Drive, Chelmsley Wood Chelmsley Wood, Woodlands Way, Chelmsley Wood, Derby Drive, Birmingham Richmond Way, Chelmsley Wood, Hedgetree Croft, Chelmsley Wood, Chelmsley Interchange , Winchester Chapelhouse Rd, Fordbridge Drive, Chelmsley Wood, Chapelhouse Rd, Fordbridge, Kington
    [Show full text]
  • Bpaapfinal to Print June 2018.Indd
    1 Bordesley Park Area Action Plan Submission Report July 2018 Contact Planning and Development Economy Directorate Birmingham City Council Click: Email: [email protected] Web: www.birmingham.gov.uk/bordesleyparkaap Call: Telephone: (0121) 675 0503 Visit: Offi ce: 1 Lancaster Circus Birmingham B4 7DJ Post: P.O. Box 28 Birmingham B1 1TR You can ask for a copy of this document in large print, another format or another language. We aim to supply what you need within ten working days. Call (0121) 464 9858 If you have hearing diffi culties please call us via Typetalk 18001 0121 464 9858 or email us at the above address. Plans contained within this document are based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Offi ce. © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Birmingham City Council. Licence number 100021326, 2018. bordesley park area action plan / contact Contents Foreword 5 Introduction 6 Context 10 Development Vision and Principles 12 Growth Connectivity Local Character Sustainability Key Opportunities for Change 24 The Wheels Site and Environs Cherrywood Road Adderley Park Alum Rock Road Coventry Road Neighbourhoods 48 Vauxhall neighbourhood Washwood Heath neighbourhood Bordesley Village neighbourhood Bordesley Green neighbourhood Small Heath (north) neighbourhood Small heath (south) neighbourhood Delivery 62 Monitoring and Evaluation 64 Appendix A - Policy context 68 Appendix B - Glossary of terms 74 contents / bordesley park area action plan 4 bordesley park area action plan / foreword Foreword 5 This is the Bordesley Park Area Action Plan (AAP) Submission Report - the next stage in the development of the strategic plan which will drive forward the regeneration of the area to the immediate east of the City Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Bordesley Park Area Action Plan
    Birmingham City Council Report to Cabinet 17 December 2019 Subject: BORDESLEY PARK AREA ACTION PLAN: ADOPTION Report of: Interim Director Inclusive Growth Relevant Cabinet Councillor Ian Ward, Leader of the Council Member: Relevant O &S Chair(s): Councillor Tahir Ali Economy and Skills Report author: Doug Lee, East and South Development Planning Manager, Telephone No 0121 464 9858, Email [email protected] Are specific wards affected? ☒Yes ☐ No – All wards affected If yes, name(s) of ward(s):Nechells, Alum Rock, Bordesley and Highgate, Bordesley Green, Small Heath Is this a key decision? ☒ Yes ☐ No If relevant, add Forward Plan Reference: 007048/2019 Is the decision eligible for call-in? ☒ Yes ☐ No Does the report contain confidential or exempt information? ☐ Yes ☒No If relevant, state which appendix is exempt, and provide exempt information paragraph number or reason if confidential : 1 Executive Summary 1.1 To note the Planning Inspectorate’s report on the Bordesley Park Area Action Plan (BPAAP) and to authorise submission of the plan to Full Council for adoption. 1.2 The BPAAP will help guide future development and regeneration within parts of Nechells, Alum Rock, Bordesley and Highgate, Bordesley Green and Small Heath wards across a significant area to the east of the city centre. It sets out a detailed framework for the delivery of new homes and jobs, as well as promoting Page 1 of 7 development opportunities for retail, community facilities, an improved environment and new transport infrastructure, including Metro. 1.3 The plan has been prepared following significant consultation and has now been subject of an Examination in Public (EIP).
    [Show full text]
  • Download: Index of Deprivation 2019
    Deprivation in Birmingham Analysis of the 2019 Indices of Deprivation December 2019 Economic Policy Inclusive Growth Directorate Summary The Indices of Deprivation 2019 The Indices of Deprivation (IOD) 2019 are the Government’s official measure of deprivation for English Income Employment Education Health local authorities and neighbourhoods. The 2019 data was released in September 2019 by the Ministry for Housing (22.5%) (22.5%) (13.5%) (13.5%) Communities and Local Government (MHCLG). The IOD includes the headline Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) as well as indices covering income deprivation for young people and for older people. This report provides analysis of the 2019 findings including: • Deprivation at a city level comparing Birmingham's performance with other areas in the region and the English Core Cities. Measures the Measures the Measures the lack of Measures the risk of attainment and skills in • Birmingham’s performance in relation to the IMD sub proportion of the proportion of the premature death and domains. population working age population the local population the impediment to experiencing involuntarily excluded quality of life through • Deprivation within the city focussing on relative levels of deprivation related to from the labour market poor physical or mental deprivation at a neighbourhood and Deprivation within low income health the city focussing on relative levels of deprivation at a neighbourhood and ward level. Crime Barriers to Living The Index of Multiple Deprivation Housing & Supplementary (9.3%) Services Environment Indices The IMD is based on 39 separate indicators, organised across seven sub domains of deprivation which are (9.3%) (9.3%) Income combined and weighted to calculate the Index of Deprivation Multiple Deprivation 2019 as shown in the infographic Affecting opposite.
    [Show full text]