DOCSLIB.ORG

Late Medieval Eucharistic Theology: a Helpful Glossary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Late Medieval Eucharistic Theology: a Helpful Glossary LATE MEDIEVAL EUCHARISTIC THEOLOGY: A HELPFUL GLOSSARY Accident: A property, or characteristic, of a thing. As distinct from the category of substance, an accident requires the existence of another being for its own existence, as ‘this white’ requires for its existence ‘this bread.’ The nine Aristotelian accidents include: Quantity, Quality, Relation, Place, Time, Position, State, Action, Passion. Most basically, these would be the “sense data” of an object, that is, anything out- wardly perceptible about a thing. Accidental being: A manner of existence requiring the existence of a substance. In medieval eucharistic theology it pertains to all the prop- erties or characteristics of the elements—color, dimensions, weight, smell, appearance—that remain unchanged at consecration. Accidental form: The structure, or organization, according to which the accidents of a thing are arranged. For example, the accidental form of the quantity of a thing is that by which the thing weighs a given amount, how the weight is distributed, and how the thing is able to be divided into pieces. Accidents, Extrinsic: Where, when, state, action, passion, position which, according to Giles of Rome, are united to substance through the mediation of the intrinsic accidents. Relation is an Intermediate Accident, by which the extrinsic accidents are related to the intrinsic accidents. Accidents, Intrinsic: Quantity and Quality. These accidents are united to a substance directly in Giles of Rome’s account of how quantity can serve as proxy for substance during Eucharistic change. Richard of Richard of Middleton calls these Absolute Accidents, for which exis- tence without a subject does not entail a contradiction. He contrasts them with Respective Accidents, which have the status of a relation of some kind, such as place, action, and relation. They are also con- trasted with Mixed Accidents, which are combinations of Absolute and Respective accidents. Neither of the latter can exist without inher- ence in some subject. 620 late medieval eucharistic theology: a helpful glossary Annihilation: The absolute destruction of a thing, by which it goes from having being to lacking being. Nothing can be said of an annihilated being, precisely because it does not exist. In the case of the Eucharist this means that the substance of the bread is reduced to nothing as it is succeeded by the substance of Christ’s body. Annihilation was rec- ognized as one of three possible explanations for eucharistic change, along with Remanence and Transubstantiation. Azyma: Unleavened Bread. The Roman Catholic Church used unleav- ened bread in the Eucharist, whereas the Eastern Orthodox used leavened bread. This was a matter of some controversy between the Churches. Although Thomas Aquinas believed that the use of unleav- ened bread is more reasonable, he maintained that Christ’s body can be confected from both. Concomitance: The body and blood of Christ are fully present in each of the consecrated elements, meaning that a communicant receiving only the wafer nevertheless receives both body and blood at once. Because the body and blood of Christ cannot be separated, they are both present even though the bread is transubstantiated only into the body of Christ and the wine only into the blood of Christ. Consubstantiation: The doctrine that, following consecration, the sub- stance of Christ’s body exists along with the substance of the bread. This doctrine, together with the annihilation and conversion theories, was considered orthodox deep into the thirteenth century, but was generally rejected in later centuries. Diaphaneity: That which experiences the change when fire is generated from the air, which Peter Auriol gives as an example of the being of a ‘symbolic form.’ The term is synonymous with transparency, and Auriol holds that the whole of the air’s transparency is transmuted to the fire, without the substance of the air remaining. This is opposed to the kind of change that involves the continued being of a subject, as with the condensation of a gas into a liquid, where the being of the sub- ject remains. The symbolic form is what holds constant in the change of transubstantiation, moving from the substance of the bread to the body of Christ. It is a logical symbol, arising from the presence of accidents in a substance extended in time and space, such that there can be a ‘this perceptible something’ that experiences the eucharistic change..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using the Concept of Reditus, As Explicated in Benedict XVI#S The
    The Eucharistic Exercises: Using the concept of reditus, as explicated in Benedict XVI#s The Spirit of the Liturgy, to understand the central movement and eucharistic context of Ignatius Loyola#s Spiritual Exercises Author: Joseph Laramie Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104990 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2012 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. THE EUCHARISTIC EXERCISES: Using the Concept of Reditus, as Explicated in Benedict XVI’s The Spirit of the Liturgy, to Understand the Central Movement and Eucharistic Context of Ignatius Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the S.T.L. Degree From the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry (Weston Jesuit) By: Joseph Laramie, SJ Co-mentor: Thomas Stegman, SJ Co-mentor: Robert Imbelli Submitted: January 27, 2012 1 Introduction to the thesis…………………………………………………………………….….4 Chapter 1: Benedict’s Christology………………………………………………………..…….7 A. The Son in the Immanent Trinity: Only begotten Logos, Son………………………..…..7 B. The Son in Creation………………………….…………………………………..………11 B.1. God’s plan for creation/humanity; covenant, revelation, freedom, sin…..…11 C. Incarnation………………………….………………………….…………………..…….17 C.1. Jesus’ Di vinity………………………………………………………………17 C.2. Jesus’ Humanity…………………………………………………………….20 C.3. Jesus’ Cross, Death, Resurrection…………………………………………..22 D. Conclusion………………………….………………………….…………………………30 Chapter 2. Benedict’s Eucharistic theology, as outlined in The Spirit of the Liturgy………31 A. First Stage: the Eternal is Embodied in What is Once-for-All…………………………..33 B. Second Stage: the Entry of the Eternal into Our Present Moment in the Liturgy…..…...36 B.1.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Few Thoughts: “ Consubstantiation Vs Transubstantiation...”
    “A few thoughts: “ Consubstantiation vs Transubstantiation...” 28/10/18 I speak in the name of Jesus the Christ, in the power of the Holy Spirit, to the glory of God the Father. Amen. A few years I ago I was asked to take a service in a well known protestant church in the City Bowl. The service went off without hitch. I was the Assistant Priest to St Michaels and All Angels in Observatory at the time. This had also been the parish largely responsible for my formation as an ordinand, Deacon and Priest. After the service had finished and I had completed my greetings at the front door to the church, I gathered my belongings and made my way to the church hall to join the parishioners for tea. As I walked past the kitchen I was quite shocked to notice the sacristans pouring the consecrated grape juice from the Mass back into the bottles. Furthermore, the consecrated bread squares were simply tumbled back into a non-descript container in the kitchen. I stopped for a second and paused, not sure what to do. Should I say something? I decided to look the other way. This was not my church. I was a guest here. What the experience did do for me in that split second is challenge me as to what my beliefs were when it came to the Blessed Sacrament. I was immediately reminded of the training I had received at university on the idea of consubstantiation vs transubstantiation. However, before we unpack these academic terms within the context of communion, I feel it may be prudent for us to reflect for a moment on our general understanding of the Eucharist, what it means to us and how the theology works around this crucial sacrament.
    [Show full text]
  • 'It Is Bread and It Is Christ's Body Too': Presence and Sacrifice in The
    ‘It is Bread and it is Christ’s Body Too’: Presence and Sacrifice in the Eucharistic Theology of Jeremy Taylor Paul Andrew Barlow PhD, MA, BSc, PGCE A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dublin City University Supervisor: Dr Joseph Rivera School of Theology, Philosophy and Music July 2019 ii I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Doctor of Philosophy is entirely my own work, and that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge breach any law of copyright, and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Signed: ID No.:15212014 Date: 15th July 2019 iii iv And yet if men would but do reason, there were in all religion no article which might more easily excuse us from meddling with questions about it than this of the holy sacrament. For as the man in Phaedrus that being asked what he carried hidden under his cloak, answered, it was hidden under his cloak; meaning that he would not have hidden it but that he intended it should be secret; so we may say in this mystery to them that curiously ask what or how it is, mysterium est, ‘it is a sacrament and a mystery;’ by sensible instruments it consigns spiritual graces, by the creatures it brings us to God, by the body it ministers to the Spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Catholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation Is Perhaps the Most Well Received Teaching When It Comes to the Application of Greek Philosophy
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2010 The aC tholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation: An Exposition and Defense Pat Selwood Bucknell University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Selwood, Pat, "The aC tholic Doctrine of Transubstantiation: An Exposition and Defense" (2010). Honors Theses. 11. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/11 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My deepest appreciation and gratitude goes out to those people who have given their support to the completion of this thesis and my undergraduate degree on the whole. To my close friends, Carolyn, Joseph and Andrew, for their great friendship and encouragement. To my advisor Professor Paul Macdonald, for his direction, and the unyielding passion and spirit that he brings to teaching. To the Heights, for the guidance and inspiration they have brought to my faith: Crescite . And lastly, to my parents, whose love, support, and sacrifice have given me every opportunity to follow my dreams. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………..………………………………………………1 Preface: Explanation of Terms………………...………………………………………......5 Chapter One: Historical Analysis of the Doctrine…………………………………...……9
    [Show full text]
  • Different Ways Christians Have Understood Baptism and Eucharist
    4 Ways Christians Have Understood Communion Sacramental Views Eastern Orthodox — “real presence” of unspecified mode Transubstantiation Consubstantiation Receptionism Memorialism the bread is no longer bread, but the bread is not only bread, but the bread is truly the body of the bread is a symbol for us to truly becomes the body of Christ is also truly the body of Christ Christ for those eat with faith remember the death of Jesus Held by Held by Held by Held by Roman Catholics Lutherans, high-church Anglicans Reformed, low-church Anglicans Baptists, nondenominational Big idea Big idea Big idea Big idea When a priest consecrates, the When a priest consecrates, the When a believing person eats Christ doesn’t give us special inner substance of bread and Spirit makes Christ present in the consecrated elements, Christ is grace in Communion; He already wine are transformed into the elements. As in the incarnation, truly present in those people. He gave us grace when we came to body and blood of Christ. The the supernatural does not is neither "in" the elements, nor him in faith. During Communion bread is merely a "veil." exclude the natural. present merely like other times. we remember that. Anglican take Anglican take Anglican Take Official quote Not taught. “After the Accepted. “The true body and Accepted. “The body and blood Not taught. “The members of consecration of bread and wine, blood of Christ are really present of Christ is then, not corporally the Church, by the sacred use of our Lord Jesus Christ, in the Supper of our Lord under or carnally, in the bread and bread and wine, are to true God and true man, is truly, the form of bread and wine and wine; but is really, and commemorate together the really, and substantially are there distributed and spiritually, present to the faith of dying love of Christ; preceded contained in the sacrament of received.” (Augsburg Confession) believers in that ordinance.
    [Show full text]
  • Eucharistic Theology Contextualized? Petros Vassiliadis
    Journal of Eastern Christian Studies 69(1-4), 281-306. doi: 10.2143/JECS.69.1.3214960 © 2017 by Journal of Eastern Christian Studies. All rights reserved. EUCHARISTIC THeOLOGY CONTeXTUALIZeD? PETROS VASSILIADIS * The courage shown by the Volos Theological Academy (and its partners) to raise the issue of the Post-Patristic character of contemporary Orthodox the- ology, both in the sense of our historical reality, and in more profound theo- logical terms, has foregrounded at a first level the tension between our pre- cious and invaluable theological past (patristic theology) and its application to our present mission (Orthodox witness), and at a second level the legiti- macy of a contemporary autonomous Orthodox theology and practice in our modern and post-modern condition (contextual theology). Although the former tension seems to have been solved almost a century ago by the famous neo-patristic theology of the late Fr. Georges Florovsky with his plea to fol- low the spirit and not the letter of the Fathers, the latter is still haunting as a ghost, conditioned by the prevailing view that Orthodoxy is the Christian denomination that is mainly characterized by its faithfulness to the tradition. All efforts to solve this latter tension are limited to the interpretation of the patristic theology; even when the question “Can Orthodox theology be con- textual?” was answered in a positive way. In my view, the inability of our Church, and by extension its current Orthodox theology, to meet this challenge is mainly due to its neglect of the Biblical tradition,1 at least to the extent that the patristic tradition is revered, * Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
    [Show full text]
  • Do This in Remembrance of Me…» E Sacrificial Aspect of the Eucharist In
    Kjetil Kringlebotten «Do this in remembrance of me…» e sacrificial aspect of the Eucharist in the systematic theology of Wolart Pannenberg and Joseph Ratzinger Master’s esis in Christian Studies (40 ECTS) NLA University College, Bergen, fall 2012 Supervisor: prof. dr. theol. Svein Rise 2 FOREWORD Working with any subject is not something done in isolation, and here I would like to first thank God, who must always be our first priority. I would also like to thank my supervisor, Svein Rise, for words of encouragement and for valuable insights, due in part to his expertice in one of my figurants, Gunnar Innerdal for valuable feedback on my paper on method (attachement 1), and those I have not only studied with, but been good friends with over the last four to five years. A special thanks goes to Ole Christian Martinsen, who has been active in the same ecclesial milieu as me, and who has worked with similar themes as I have, and Karen Marie Hovland, who has herself worked with Pannenberg, and has helped me in my attempt at grasping his theology. A great thanks goes to my fellow ‘inmates’ at my student home Collegium Sta Sunniva, and to my parish in Sandviken. Allow me to finish with some words from Scripture: Now the point in what we are saying is this: we have such a high priest, one who is seated at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in heaven, a minister in the sanctuary and the true tent which is set up not by man but by the Lord.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centenary Lecture Given at Edinburgh on 11Th and at Aberdeen on 12Th November 1982 by the Rev Principal a Raymond George
    CENTENARY LECTURE: Some New Anaphoras Compared THE CENTENARY LECTURE GIVEN AT EDINBURGH ON 11TH AND AT ABERDEEN ON 12TH NOVEMBER 1982 BY THE REV PRINCIPAL A RAYMOND GEORGE. The liturgiologist, unlike perhaps the person in the pew, will always regard the eucharist, the full service of word and sacrament, preaching-service and the Lord's Supper, as the centre of Christian worship and the anaphora, canon, prayer of consecration, eucharistic prayer of thanksgiving as the centre of the Lord's Supper. We are all familiar with the four-action shape, popularized by Dom Gregory Dix in The Shape of the Liturgy. Our Lord took bread, blessed it (or, as some versions have it) gave thanks, broke it, and gave it to the disciples, and so, apart from the breaking, with the wine; but the Church soon reduced these seven actions to four. We now see that of these four the taking and the breaking were utilitarian, not but what we may well imitate them. The heart of the matter lies in the eating and drinking, together with the grace before meals which precedes them, the thanksgiving which should mark every Christian meal but which on occasions turns the meal into a Christian eucharist. Though the early church had plenty of anaphoras, by the time of the Reformation not many were in widespread use. Though there were other rites, e.g., in the non-Chalcedonian churches of the East and in places such as Milan in the West, the two chief survivors were the liturgy of St Chrysostom (or on occasion St Basil) in the East and the Roman Mass in the West, which assumed what was meant to be its final form in the Tridentine Mass of 1570.
    [Show full text]
  • Church History, Lesson 9: the Reformation Church, Part 2 (1517 – 1648): Reformed Reformation and Radical Reformation
    69 Church History, Lesson 9: The Reformation Church, Part 2 (1517 – 1648): Reformed Reformation and Radical Reformation 27. Reformed Reformation a. Ulrich Zwingli (1484 – 1531) (Zurich) i. The birth of Reformed faith 1. Zwingli is credited with the birth of the Reformed faith. 2. Zwingli arrived at Reformation ideas different and independent from Luther. 3. In 1522, Zwingli preached against laws of fasting and abstinence in Zurich (controlled by Rome). Some of Zwingli’s colleagues met at a home, and ate sausages on Ash Wednesday. Eventually the Council of Zurich called for a debate. The Council, since Rome refused to respond and did not answer, deemed Zwingli the winner. 4. The Mass was officially abolished in 1525. The significance is that Zurich is no longer Roman Catholic. 5. With Catholic and Protestant cantons (i.e., independent states) in Switzerland, civil war broke out in 1529 and 1531 (Kappel Wars). Zwingli, a patriot and soldier, died fighting in a battle against the Catholics unrelated to the civil war. ii. Theological comparison: Luther vs. Zwingli 1. Lord’s Supper (Marburg Colloquy, 1529) a. Luther: Christ is physically present in the Lord’s Supper. This view is called consubstantiation: The bread and wine contain Christ’s body and blood. b. Zwingli: Christ is not present in the Lord’s Supper. This view is called nonsubstantiation (or memorialism). The bread and wine only represent Christ’s body and blood. 2. Public worship Church History © 2015 by Dan Burrus 70 a. Luther: allows into public worship what the Bible does not prohibit. (This is called the Normative Principle of worship.) b.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Transubstantiation: Understanding the Truth of the Church's Teaching
    1 Transubstantiation: Understanding the Truth of the Church's Teaching by Understanding the Meaning and Import of the Church's Teaching Lonergan Institute for the “Good Under Construction” © May 1, 2015 Understanding the Church's teaching about what could be meant and what is said by the doctrine of transubstantiation is no easy task. Not done quickly. If you or I were to go down into a public space and if we were to say that we happen to believe in the real presence of Christ within the Eucharist, we would probably be understood. If there are other believers present (and others who have lost their faith) and if they have all received some kind of catechetical formation about what occurs at the celebration of Mass, they would understand, as Catholics, what would be meant by the real presence of Christ within the Eucharist. However, if, instead, any of us were to say that we believe in transubstantiation, we would probably not be understood by anyone (whether Catholic or not). In the same way too, we would probably not be understood if we were to say publicly that we happen to believe in the consubstantiality of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. Like transubstantiality, consubstantiality exists as a technical term. Its use invokes a technical form of expression and the use of all technical terms points to technical meanings of one kind or another that are being signified and which are supposed to be communicated through the use of technical terms. In these instances (as examples), the teaching office of the Catholic Church sometimes prescribes teachings which are to be held and believed although they are not immediately or commonly understood by most persons who are to be regarded either as believers or as potential believers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sign and Word: Martin Luther's Theology of the Sacraments
    Restoration Quarterly Volume 32 Number 3 Article 1 7-1-1990 Sign and Word: Martin Luther's Theology of the Sacraments Kenneth R. Craycraft Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/restorationquarterly Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, Christianity Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, Missions and World Christianity Commons, Practical Theology Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Craycraft, Kenneth R. Jr. (1990) "Sign and Word: Martin Luther's Theology of the Sacraments," Restoration Quarterly: Vol. 32 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/restorationquarterly/vol32/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Digital Commons @ ACU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Restoration Quarterly by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ ACU. VOLUME 32/NUMBER 3 THIRD QUARTER 1990 ResLoROt=ton _ aa1<Le1<lcY Sign and Word: Martin Luther's Theology of the Sacraments Kenneth R. Craycraft, Jr. Waltham, Massachusetts The study of any aspect of Martin Luther's theology must be seen in its historical context. While it may confidently be maintained that Luther presented fresh ideas and new approaches to doing theology, 1 it must also be said that much of his work was in reaction to what went on around him. This, at times, is a weakness. One can better understand Luther's system if one sees it in juxtaposition to others who were writing at the time. This explains to some extent the polemical emphasis that is present in much of his writing.2 Luther was often writing in response to what he saw as improper doctrine being taught by others.
    [Show full text]
  • The Church As a Eucharistic and Prophetic Community in India: A
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 5-11-2018 The hC urch as a Eucharistic and Prophetic Community in India: A Theological Exploration into the Challenges and Implications of a Eucharistic Ecclesiology Based on the Early Church and the Statements of the Indian Theological Association (ITA) Shibi Devasia Duquesne University Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, Missions and World Christianity Commons, and the Practical Theology Commons Recommended Citation Devasia, S. (2018). The hC urch as a Eucharistic and Prophetic Community in India: A Theological Exploration into the Challenges and Implications of a Eucharistic Ecclesiology Based on the Early Church and the Statements of the Indian Theological Association (ITA) (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1433 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHURCH AS A EUCHARISTIC AND PROPHETIC COMMUNITY IN INDIA: A THEOLOGICAL EXPLORATION INTO THE CHALLENGES AND IMPLICATIONS OF A EUCHARISTIC ECCLESIOLOGY BASED ON THE EARLY CHURCH AND THE STATEMENTS OF THE INDIAN THEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (ITA) A Dissertation Submitted to McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Theology By Shibi Devasia May 2018 Copyright by Shibi Devasia 2018 ABSTRACT THE CHURCH AS A EUCHARISTIC AND PROPHETIC COMMUNITY IN INDIA: A THEOLOGICAL EXPLORATION INTO THE CHALLENGES AND IMPLICATIONS OF A EUCHARISTIC ECCLESIOLOGY BASED ON THE EARLY CHURCH AND THE STATEMENTS OF THE INDIAN THEOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (ITA) By Shibi Devasia May 2018 Dissertation supervised by Dr.
    [Show full text]