The Twisted Sisters: Disputing Iconic Urban Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Twisted Sisters: Disputing Iconic Urban Design 27 The Twisted Sisters: Disputing Iconic Urban Design Jill L. Grant Chloe Gillis An analysis of a dispute over high-rise buildings proposed for downtown Halifax, Canada, reveals the ascendance of new popular theories affecting planning discourse, processes, and outcomes. The dispute pitted advocates of iconic urban design against groups committed to heritage conservation in an older urban district. Project proponents employed urban design ideas to weaken heritage protection (historic preservation) and used creative class arguments to support high-rise structures in a low-rise zone. The case provided part of the context within which the city ultimately developed urban design policies and plan processes that substitute public participation with professional expertise. Planning activities such as development disputes and conserve views of the harbor from the heights of the reflect dominant theories, values, and processes of the Citadel Hill fortress at the heart of the city (see Figure 1). times in which they occur (Forester 1989; Gottdiener By contrast, the arguments that development proponents 1994). While the particulars of cases inevitably vary so and city planners made in the Twisted Sisters case reveal that direct comparison of how matters are handled is rarely the extent to which planning activities and decisions are possible, detailed examination of disputes can expose the influenced by fashionable theories, and how new theories types of arguments presented by various stakeholders, and affect planning arguments, processes, and outcomes. how they relate to the dominant theories of the time. This The paper begins by setting the context of development paper examines the dispute around a development known in Halifax before proceeding to discuss the Twisted Sisters locally in Halifax, Nova Scotia, as the Twisted Sisters case. The concluding section reflects on new theories case.1 In 2005, a developer applied to build two twisting, appearing in the dispute, and their implications for 27-storey towers on a downtown site, exceeding the as- community engagement in future. of-right height limits by over 200 feet. After City Council approved the project, heritage advocates appealed, but lost their case. Despite gaining all the necessary approvals, the Jill L. Grant is a Professor of Planning at Dalhousie University project never broke ground, and the original development in Halifax, Canada. Her current research projects focus on agreement with the city expired in 2010. trends in suburban areas, health and the built environment, and An examination of land use disputes in Halifax planning for creative cities. indicates that many themes, strategies, and theories employed by heritage advocates remained constant over Chloe Gillis graduated with a major in Urban Design Studies the decades. Heritage advocates continue to argue that new from Dalhousie University in May 2012. Her honors thesis development should be sympathetic to heritage buildings examined the development project reported here. 28 Grant and Gillis Figure 1: View from the Citadel over the site where the towers would rise. Image courtesy of Jill Grant. The Context In 1996, the Province of Nova Scotia amalgamated Halifax Regional Municipality—known as HRM the City of Halifax with two nearby municipalities and the or Halifax (the City)—is a mid-sized port city of larger county to create Halifax Regional Municipality. By approximately 400,000 people on Canada’s Atlantic coast. the early years of the 21st century, theories related to new Settled in 1749, it is one of the oldest cities in the country urbanism and smart growth influenced planning disputes with a rich heritage of historic sites and buildings. Citadel in Halifax and a regional planning exercise was underway Hill, location of the historic fortress that protected the city to coordinate planning across the vast municipality (Grant through the centuries, overlooks the harbor and central 2007). The positions of heritage advocates had not changed business district (CBD). The city’s central grid of narrow from the earlier period but planners’ logics had altered as streets and rectangular blocks is an artifact of early British they paid greater attention to issues of human scale, urban military town planning in the Americas. Although it is vitality, and smart growth (Grant 2007). the capital of Nova Scotia, Halifax experienced relatively After Richard Florida (2002; 2005) visited the city slow growth through the 20th century. In the 1960s through in 2004 (HRM 2004), his ideas about the need for cities the 1970s, Halifax desperately sought development and to attract and retain the creative class (that is, talented and tended to approve many projects despite protests (Grant creative workers) were adopted into economic and other 1994a). Consequently, many heritage structures remain policies (Gertler and Vinodrai 2004; HRM 2005; Grant interspersed with high-rise buildings that appeared in the and Kronstal 2010). The middle part of the decade also city center starting in the 1960s (Collier 1974; Pacey 1979). witnessed growing interest in urban design. The city Like other cities, Halifax has experienced many hired a staff expert and launched a process to develop an disputes over proposed projects in the CBD. During the urban design strategy. Recent disputes reveal the growing 1970s, heritage groups began to organize to preserve and influence of creative cities and urban design theories in protect valuable heritage assets they saw being lost (Pacey planning discourse. 1979). They convinced City Council to adopt heritage policies in plans and to designate protected view-planes The Case from the Citadel. The view-planes safeguarded views of On 16 December 2005 the City’s administrative particular features from particular locations (rather than officers forwarded case 00709, a development agreement panoramic views of the harbor). Tactics of opposing for the former Texpark site, to the Heritage Advisory projects gradually changed from marches with picket signs Committee (HAC) and to the District 12 Planning Advisory to sophisticated publicity strategies and legal challenges. Committee for consideration with the recommendation it be While ideas from planning critics like Jane Jacobs and approved (English and Anstey 2005). Located in the CBD Prince Charles made their way into the arguments of amidst a mix of low-, medium-, and high-rise buildings and those opposing new high-rise projects in Halifax during vacant lots, the site was near several registered heritage the 1980s and 1990s (Grant 1994b), planners generally properties and two blocks from Halifax harbor (see Figure articulated rational planning paradigm arguments (Grant 2). The site previously housed a gasoline station and car 1994a). park that were demolished in 2004 after the city built a Carolina Planning Volume 37 The Twisted Sisters: Disputing Iconic Urban Design 29 new public parking structure nearby. After arranging to policies in the plan sought to preserve and restore heritage purchase the land from the city, United Gulf Developments resources in city center. Protecting views and limiting proposed to build a mixed-use development with a common heights around Citadel Hill were of special concern during four-level podium and two towers of 27 storeys each. As- discussions at the HAC meeting. Questions arose about of-right zoning for the site permitted a height of 40 feet, the meaning of “vicinity”, “adjacent”, and “immediate but the plan allowed Council to alter that limit through the environs” in heritage policies such as 6.3 and 6.4. negotiated development agreement process, provided that other plan policies were respected. The proposed towers 6.3 The City shall maintain or recreate a sensitive and would soar 285 feet above Hollis Street (see Figure 3). complimentary setting for Citadel Hill by controlling The developer presented a design by Hariri Pontarini the height of new development in its vicinity to reflect of Toronto, an internationally respected architectural firm the historic and traditional scale of development. (Hariri Pontarini 2011). Drawings showed towers of glass, stone, and metal twisting upward, seemingly defying 6.3.1 The intent of such height controls shall be to gravity. The slender tower would feature a high-end hotel establish a generally low to medium rise character while the chunkier tower would include condominiums. of development in the area of approximately four The podium would house restaurants, retail, and office traditional storeys in height immediately adjacent to space. The twisted towers design—soon dubbed the Citadel Hill and increasing with distance therefrom… “Twisted Sisters”—received rave reviews from many architects and architectural critics (Bentley Mays 2006; Canadian Consulting Engineer 2006). Local designers welcomed the proposal for tall buildings and complimented the architects for “not just making this your basic shard in the sky” but creating something “elegant” with a “post-modern sensibility” (Van Berkel 2006). Relevant policies for deciding the case dealt with ensuring appropriate scale, design, massing, and compatibility with the block pattern and heritage buildings; creating a lively and vibrant pedestrian environment downtown; protecting views from the Citadel; minimizing impacts related to wind, shadows, and traffic; and optimizing economic and social benefits from the project. Staff advised committees and decision makers that the “Council has a high degree of latitude” in determining desirable characteristics
Recommended publications
  • Who Lives in Downtown Halifax?
    Jill L Grant and Will Gregory Dalhousie University Who Lives Downtown? Tracking population change in a mid-sized city: Halifax, 1951-2011 Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada How did planning policies in the post-war period affect the character and composition of the central city? Followed four central census tracts from 1951 to 2011 to look at how population changed Map by Uytae Lee based on HRM data Planning Changes 1945 Master Plan and 1950 Official Plan advocated slum clearance Urban renewal: Cleared the north central downtown http://spacing.ca/atlantic/2009/12/03/from-the-vaults-scotia-square/ http://www.halifaxtransit.ca/streetcars/birney.php Urban Design and Regional Planning Policy shifted: 1970s Downtown Committee and waterfront revitalization sought residents for downtown; heritage conservation. 1970s Metropolitan Area Planning Commission: regional planning forecast population explosion. Suburban expansion followed. https://www.flickr.com/photos/beesquare/985096478 http://www.vicsuites.com/ Amalgamation and the Regional Centre 1996: amalgamation created Halifax Regional Municipality. Smart city, smart growth vision Regional Centre: target to take 25% of regional growth until 2031. Central urban design plan, density bonusing: promoting housing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax_Town_Clock Planning and Residential Development High density but primarily residential uses concentrated in south and north of downtown In Central Business District, residential uses are allowed on upper floors: residential towers. Since 2009,
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA RELEASE for Immediate Release Downtowns Atlantic
    MEDIA RELEASE For Immediate Release Downtowns Atlantic Canada Conference Brings Business Improvement Districts to Halifax May 23, 2018, Halifax, NS – Downtowns Atlantic Canada (DAC) is hosting its annual conference in Halifax, May 27‐29, 2018, attracting business improvement districts (BIDs), urban planners, small businesses, and municipal staff from the Atlantic provinces. Inspired by the challenges small businesses face on a day‐to‐day basis, this year's DAC Conference, "Bringing Small Business Matters to the Forefront," sets out to present a program dedicated to addressing small business issues. The keynote speakers and panel discussions will address many of these issues and provide BIDs the tools and motivation to lead small business communities and keep main streets vibrant and prosperous. “The DAC Conference is an excellent opportunity for delegates to share ideas and best practices,” said Paul MacKinnon, DAC President and Executive Director of Downtown Halifax Business Commission. “This year’s focus is an important one as we need to support the needs of small businesses to maintain healthy and thriving downtowns and main streets.” The 2018 DAC Conference is co‐hosted by the eight business improvement districts in Halifax: Downtown Dartmouth Business Commission, Downtown Halifax Business Commission, North End Business Association, Sackville Business Association, Spring Garden Area Business Association, Spryfield Business Commission, Quinpool Road Mainstreet District Association, and Village on Main – Community Improvement District. To stay up‐to‐date and to join the conversation, follow #DACHalifax2018 on Twitter and Instagram. There are two sessions at the DAC Conference that are free and open to the public: DAC Opening Night PechaKucha 7:30 to 10:00 pm – Sunday, May 27 The Seahorse Tavern PechaKucha 20x20 is a simple presentation format where presenters show 20 images, each for 20 seconds.
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE of CONTENTS 1.0 Background
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Background ....................................................................... 1 1.1 The Study ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 The Study Process .............................................................................................. 2 1.2 Background ......................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Early Settlement ................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Community Involvement and Associations ...................................................... 4 1.5 Area Demographics ............................................................................................ 6 Population ................................................................................................................................... 6 Cohort Model .............................................................................................................................. 6 Population by Generation ........................................................................................................... 7 Income Characteristics ................................................................................................................ 7 Family Size and Structure ........................................................................................................... 8 Household Characteristics by Condition and Period of
    [Show full text]
  • Halifax Transit Riders' Guide
    RIDERS’ GUIDE Effective November 23, 2020 311 | www.halifax.ca/311 Departures Line: 902-480-8000 halifax.ca/transit @hfxtransit TRANSIT Routes The transit fleet is 100% accessible and equipped with bike racks. 1 Spring Garden 5 2 Fairview page 7 3 Crosstown 11 4 Universities 15 5 Chebucto 19 7 Robie 20 8 Sackville 22 9A/B Herring Cove 28 10 Dalhousie 34 11 Dockyard 37 14 Leiblin Park 38 21 Timberlea 40 22 Armdale 42 25 Governors Brook 44 28 Bayers Lake 45 29 Barrington 46 30A Parkland 48 30B Dunbrack 48 32 Cowie Hill Express 50 39 Flamingo 51 41 Dartmouth—Dalhousie 52 51 Windmill 53 53 Notting Park 54 54 Montebello 55 55 Port Wallace 56 56 Dartmouth Crossing 57 57 Russell Lake 58 58 Woodlawn 59 59 Colby 60 60 Eastern Passage—Heritage Hills 62 61 Auburn—North Preston 66 62 Wildwood 70 63 Woodside 72 64 Burnside 73 65 Caldwell (stop location revised) 74 66 Penhorn 75 68 Cherry Brook 76 72 Portland Hills 78 78 Mount Edward Express 79 79 Cole Harbour Express 79 82/182 First Lake/First Lake Express 80 83/183 Springfield/Springfield Express 82 84 Glendale 84 85/185 Millwood/Millwood Express 85 86/186 Beaver Bank/Beaver Bank Express 88 87 Sackville—Dartmouth 90 88 Bedford Commons 92 90 Larry Uteck 93 91 Hemlock Ravine 97 93 Bedford Highway 99 123 Timberlea Express 99 135 Flamingo Express 100 136 Farnham Gate Express 100 137 Clayton Park Express 101 138 Parkland Express 101 159 Portland Hills Link 102 182 First Lake Express 103 183/185/186 Sackville Express Routes 104 194 West Bedford Express 105 196 Basinview Express 106 320 Airport—Fall River Regional Express 107 330 Tantallon—Sheldrake Lake Regional Express 108 370 Porters Lake Regional Express 108 401 Preston—Porters Lake—Grand Desert 109 415 Purcells Cove 110 433 Tantallon 110 Ferry Alderney Ferry and Woodside Ferry 111 Understanding the Route Schedules This Riders' Guide contains timetables for all Halifax Transit routes in numerical order.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Halifax (2 to 4 Hrs; ~ 11 Km Or 7 Miles)
    Downtown Halifax (2 to 4 Hrs; ~ 11 km or 7 miles) This route can be completed in as little as two hours however we recommend planning for a commitment of four giving you time to experience each of the destinations and stop for lunch. This self-guided route allows you to stop n’ go as you like while you explore Downtown Halifax’s primary sights & attractions. FAQ: Did you know that people living in Halifax are known as “Haligonians”? Highlights: Halifax Waterfront, Farmer’s Market, Point Pleasant Park, Public Gardens, Spring Garden Road, Citadel Hill, Halifax Central Library, City Hall, Argyle Street, and Pizza Corner. Key Neighbourhoods: Downtown, Waterfront, South End Tips // Things to do: • Try a donair, poutine or lobster roll at Pizza Corner • Grab a soft serve ice cream at the Dairy Bar • Get your photo with the Drunken Lamp Posts • Retrace Halifax’s role as a military bastion as you explore fortress relics in Point Pleasant Park later making your way in the center of it all, Citadel Hill • Catch incredible views atop the award winning Halifax Central Library • Take your pick for a patio on Argyle Street • Get a selfie at the internationally recognized Botkin Mural outside Freak Lunch (if you haven’t had ice cream yet, Freak Lunch Box has amazing milkshakes.) Lost? Give us a call we will put you back on track 902 406 7774 www.iheartbikeshfx.com Line Busy? Call our Support Line at 902 719 4325. 1507 Lower Water Street Notes // Safety Tips: - On road riding is required for this route.
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial and Municipal Land Transactions ­ QEH
    PO Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. 5 Halifax Regional Council November 18, 2008 Committee of the Whole TO: Mayor Kelly and Members of Halifax Regional Council SUBMITTED BY: Dan English, Chief Administrative Officer Wayne Anstey, Deputy Chief Administrative Officer ­ Operations DATE: November 06, 2008 SUBJECT: Provincial and Municipal Land Transactions ­ QEH ORIGIN • Council’s July 3, 2007 In Camera Report authorizing the conveyance and terms for the former Truscan/Birks at Barrington and George Streets, the former Halifax Infirmary at Queen Street and a portion of the former Queen Elizabeth High School (QEH) lands, and furthermore, a motion to defer the portion of the June 22, 2007 report as it relates to Queen Elizabeth High School building to clearly define the contract with the Province in terms of HRM’s public expectations for use and timing of the re­development of the QEH building, and reaffirm HRM’s desire to sell the balance of the QEH site for the expansion of the QEII Infirmary. < Information Report entitled, ‘Public Response ­ Queen Elizabeth High School ­ Future Use Options’, dated January 23, 2008. (Attachment B) < Halifax Regional Council’s June 24, 2008 request for an amendment to the Municipal Government Act granting Council the discretion to convey a portion of the Halifax Common to the Province of Nova Scotia with the request to be forwarded to the Province of Nova Scotia for consideration for the Fall 2008 sitting of the House of Assembly. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Regional Council: 1. Reinstate the deferred school building portion of the QEH property as part of the approved “Provincial and Municipal Land Transactions” as per the Budget Implications Section of this Report; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed 2019/20 Multi-Year Halifax Transit Budget and Business Plan
    P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. 4 Budget Committee January 30, 2019 TO: Chair and Members of Budget Committee (Standing Committee of the Whole on Budget) SUBMITTED BY: Jacques Dubé, Chief Administrative Officer DATE: January 21, 2019 SUBJECT: Proposed 2019/20 Multi-year Halifax Transit Budget and Business Plan ORIGIN As per Administrative Order 1 and the Budget and Business Plan consultation schedule presented to Regional Council on October 16, 2018, staff is required to present the draft 2019/20 Business Unit Budget and Business Plans to the Budget Committee for review and discussion prior to consideration by Regional Council. At the May 22, 2012 meeting of Regional Council, the following motion was put and passed: Request that Metro Transit come to Regional Council one month prior to budget presentations to present any proposed changes to Metro Transit service so that Council has ample time to debate the proposed changes before the budget comes to Council. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Halifax Charter, section 35 (1) The Chief Administrative Officer shall (b) ensure that an annual budget is prepared and submitted to the Council. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Budget Committee direct staff to prepare the Halifax Transit’s 2019/20 Multi- year Budget and Business Plan, as proposed in the accompanying presentation, based on the 1.9% option, and to prepare Over and Under items for that Plan as directed by Regional Council. BACKGROUND As part of the design of the 2019/20 Budget and Business Plan development process, the Budget Committee is reviewing each Business Unit’s budget and proposed plans, in advance of completing detailed HRM Budget and Business Plan preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Village Road Complete Streets Functional Plan
    P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. 9.1.1 Halifax Regional Council June 9, 2020 TO: Mayor Savage and Members of Halifax Regional Council SUBMITTED BY: Jacques Dubé, Chief Administrative Officer DATE: January 24, 2020 SUBJECT: Dutch Village Road Complete Streets Functional Plan ORIGIN On July 19, 2016, the following motion of Regional Council was put and passed: “Direct staff to undertake preliminary design work to confirm the cost and feasibility of providing pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and potentially other streetscape elements where needed, on Dutch Village Road and report back to Regional Council, and further that if approved by Regional Council, the project be considered for future delivery through the active transportation capital program and include a public engagement process.” The Making Connections: 2014-19 Halifax Active Transportation Priorities Plan, approved by Regional Council on September 9, 2014, lists Dutch Village Road as a Candidate Bicycle Route. The Integrated Mobility Plan - Action 69: Deliver the following Priority Sidewalk Connection by 2020: Dutch Village Road; Action 121: Identify “Strategic Corridors” – existing road corridors that are key to regional traffic flow, transit, goods movement and active transportation – and develop plans that will guide their development over time. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Halifax Regional Municipality Charter, subsection 318(2): “In so far as is consistent with their use by the public, the Council has full control over the streets in the Municipality.” Halifax Regional Municipality Charter, subsection 322(1): “The Council may design, lay out, open, expand, construct, maintain, improve, alter, repair, light, water, clean, and clear streets in the Municipality.” RECOMMENDATION ON PAGE 2 Dutch Village Road Complete Streets Functional Plan Council Report - 2 - June 9, 2020 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Halifax Regional Council 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Chebucto Peninsula) Municipal Planning Strategy and Land Use By-Law for 90 Club Road and a Portion of PID 40072530, Harrietsfield
    P.O. Box 1749 Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3A5 Canada Item No. 15.5.2 Halifax Regional Council April 30, 2019 TO: Mayor Savage Members of Halifax Regional Council Original Signed SUBMITTED BY: For Councillor Stephen D. Adams, Chair, Halifax and West Community Council DATE: April 10, 2019 SUBJECT: Case 20160: Amendments to the Planning District 5 (Chebucto Peninsula) Municipal Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law for 90 Club Road and a portion of PID 40072530, Harrietsfield ORIGIN April 9, 2019 meeting of Halifax and West Community Council, Item 13.1.2. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY HRM Charter, Part 1, Clause 25(c) – “The powers and duties of a Community Council include recommending to the Council appropriate by-laws, regulations, controls and development standards for the community.” RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Halifax Regional Council: 1. Give first reading to consider the proposed amendments to the Municipal Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law for Planning District 5 (Chebucto Peninsula), as set out in Attachments A and B of the staff report dated January 8, 2019, to enable the conversion of a former satellite receiving station to a commercial use at 90 Club Road, Harrietsfield and to permit residential uses on the remainder of the property and a portion of PID 40072530, Harrietsfield and schedule a joint public hearing; and 2. Adopt the proposed amendments to the Municipal Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law for Planning District 5 (Chebucto Peninsula), as set out in Attachments A and B of the staff report dated January 8, 2019. Case 20160 Council Report - 2 - April 30, 2019 BACKGROUND At their April 9, 2019 meeting, Halifax and West Community Council considered the staff report dated January 8, 2019 regarding Case 20160: Amendments to the Planning District 5 (Chebucto Peninsula) Municipal Planning Strategy and Land Use By-law for 90 Club Road and a portion of PID 40072530, Harrietsfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Municipal Planning Strategy
    Regional Municipal Planning Strategy August 2006 THIS COPY IS A REPRINT OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPAL PLANNING STRATEGY WITH AMENDMENTS TO 26 JULY 2008 REGIONAL MUNICIPAL PLANNING STRATEGY THIS IS TO CERTIFY that this is a true copy of the Regional Municipal Planning Strategy which was duly passed at a duly called meeting of the Council of Halifax Regional Municipality held on the 27th day of June, A.D. 2006, which includes all amendments thereto which have been approved by the Municipality and are in effect as of the 26th day of July, 2008. GIVEN UNDER THE HAND of the Municipal Clerk and the corporate seal of the Municipality this ____ day of _____________, A.D. 2008. ________________________ Julia Horncastle Acting Municipal Clerk ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Regional Municipal Planning Strategy has been prepared according to the provisions of the Municipal Government Act and pursuant to Regional Council's adoption of the Regional Planning Phase II Action Plan on December 3, 2002 and Public Consultation Resolution on September 2, 2003. The Plan covers the entire Halifax Regional Municipality. Instrumental in guiding the planning and public consultation process was a Regional Planning Committee (RPC) comprised of 5 citizens, 3 Regional Councillors, and the Municipality’s Chief Administrative Officer. The Committee held regular meetings which were open to the public and was responsible for public engagement and awareness building initiatives. The RPC is acknowledged for the success of general public input and participation throughout the process. The RPC have fulfilled its mandate and have delivered a Regional Plan which upholds the Regional Planning Principles, Goals and Objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Development of Condominiums in Halifax, Ns 1972 - 2016
    MAPPING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONDOMINIUMS IN HALIFAX, NS 1972 - 2016 by Colin K. Werle Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of GEOG 4526 for the Degree Bachelor of Arts (Honours) Department of Geography and Environmental Studies Saint Mary’s University Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada © Colin Werle, 2017 April, 2017 Members of the Examining Committee: Dr. Mathew Novak (Supervisor) Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Saint Mary’s University Dr. Ryan Gibson School of Environmental Design and Rural Development University of Guelph ABSTRACT Mapping the Development of Condominiums in Halifax, NS from 1972 – 2016 by Colin K. Werle This thesis offers foundational insight into the spatial and temporal patterns of condominium development in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Characteristics that are analysed include: age, assessed values, building types, heights, number of units, and amenities. Results show that condominium development in Halifax first appeared in the suburbs in the 1970s, with recent activity occurring in more central areas. The greatest rate of development was experienced during a condominium boom in the late 1980s, however, development has been picking up over the last decade. Apartment style buildings are the major type of developments, with an average building size of 46.52 units. Similar to other markets in Canada, Halifax’s condominium growth does appear to be corresponding with patterns of re- centralization after decades of peripheral growth in the second half of the twentieth-century. April, 2017 ii RÉSUMÉ Mapping the Development of Condominiums in Halifax, NS from 1972 – 2016 by Colin K. Werle Cette dissertation donnera un aperçu des tendances spatiales et temporelles de base sur le développement des condominiums à Halifax (Nouvelle-Écosse).
    [Show full text]
  • 6140 Quinpool Road Halifax, Nova Scotia
    FOR LEASE 6140 Quinpool Road Halifax, Nova Scotia Prime Quinpool Road Retail +/- 1,830 - 3,750 sf Lower-Level Retail Space | Lease Rate: $30.00 psf Gross PROPERTY OVERVIEW PROPERTY TYPE 2 storey commercial building, currently undergoing Easily accessible, Tenant parking substantial renovations. 20 + bus routes options available FEATURES Excellent opportunity to occupy 1,830 sf of space on the lower level of a retail building on a high traffic thoroughfare. This lower level space offers barrier free Over 30,000 cars High pedestrian access and a ceiling height of 10’ clear. A blank slate, passing daily traffic area tenants can customize the space based on their needs. AVAILABLE SPACE Approximately 1,830 sf with potential for up to 3,750 sf Building signage Barrier free access PANDEMIC-PREPARED with excellent with wheelchair roadside visibility elevator If a tenant is forced to close due to a pandemic (or state of emergency), they are not required to pay rent. Contact MEAGHAN MACDOUGALL Retail Sales & Leasing +1 902 266 6211 [email protected] FOR LEASE Aerial6140 / Location QuinpoolMap Road Halifax, Nova Scotia HALIFAX NORTH END HALIFAX COMMONS DOWNTOWN HALIFAX 6140 QUINPOOL ROAD QEII HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY ARMDALE ROTARY LOCATION Quinpool Road lies on the western edge of the Halifax Commons and serves as one of Halifax’s main arterial roads connecting the downtown core of Halifax with the Armdale Rotary, leading to the West End, Herring Cove, Armdale, Clayton Park, Fairview and Highway 102. You’ll be joining other prime retailers such as the NSLC, Wendy’s, TD Starbucks, Atlantic Superstore, Canadian Tire and many more.
    [Show full text]