DOCSLIB.ORG

A Water Year to Remember: Fire to Flood Reflections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A Water Year to Remember: Fire to Flood Reflections Panelists: Jeremy Lancaster Supervising Engineering Geologist California Geological Survey Rachael Orellana Flood Risk Program Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tom Fayram Deputy Director County of Santa Barbara Pubic Works Department Moderator: Melissa Weymiller Jon Frey Project Manager Engineering Manager Flood Risk Management Program Santa Barbara County U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Control District A Water Year to Remember: Fire and Flood Reflections Floodplain Management Association Annual Conference Reno, Nevada Wednesday, 2018 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Jeremy Lancaster – Sup. Engineering Geologist California Geological Survey 2017 Wildfires – Historic Context California Wildfires Years over 1 million acres since 1987 Year Fires Acres 2017 9,133 1,248,606 2008 6,255 1,593,690 2007 6,043 1,520,362 1999 11,125 1,172,850 1987‐2016 average: 555,700 acres Source: CAL FIRE http://www.cnrfc.noaa.gov/radarArchive.php Post‐Wildfire Hazards to Life and Property PHYSICAL HAZARD EXPOSURE CHEMICAL HAZARD EXPOSURE • Flooding – 2 to 3 Times the • Incinerated household and Water industrial waste • Debris Flow – 20 Foot thick • Runoff laden with toxic soil boulder laden surge fronts • Degradation of water quality • Rockfall – Can be triggered by wind after a fire! • Hazard Trees – They fall on things! Public knowledge of these hazards generally lacking! Atlas Fire Napa/Solano Counties January 9, 2018; 5pm 2.6 inches, January 8‐ 10 • 1 Death ‐ debris slide/debris flow on CA‐121 ~5pm at Wooden Valley Road • CA‐121 Closed for one day Detwiler Fire March 22, 2018; 6:15p Mariposa County • 2 Deaths • 2 Residences flooded • High School flooded • Elementary School flooded • 11 Roadway Crossings Flooded Slinkard Fire May 21, 2018; 6:27p Mono County • U.S. 395 Damaged and Blocked in two locations • Maximum of 8 feet of mud and rocks • Topaz Lodge Damaged Photo Credit: Tim Bardsley, • 200 People Evacuated to Upper Floor NWS Cranston Fire August 16, 2018; ~3pm Riverside County • Several Road Closures • 6 foot deep debris flow • Hurkey Creek Campground Inundated Credit: Alex Tardy, NWS January 8, 2018; 3:45 am Thomas Fire Santa Barbara/Ventura • 23 lives lost • 20 foot deep debris flows in numerous canyons • >400 homes damaged • 41 structures knocked off foundations and completely washed away • Four major bridges destroyed • >$420,000,000 in losses Post‐Fire Hazard Perspectives: Post‐Fire Hazard Identification and Communication: • Where is the hazard most prevalent: Alluvial Fans Do we Communicate Hazards on Alluvial Fans? • Flood Risk – YES! • Post‐fire Debris Flow Risk – Yes and No! • USGS Modeling of Hazard Limited to Canyon Mouths • No Debris Flow Risk‐Based Mapping on the Fan Landforms • Does the 100‐year floodplain accurately communicate the hazard to the public? • Given that we anticipate fire and weather extremes in a changing climate, how can we move forward to address this identification and communication gap? POST-WILDFIRE COMMUNICATION AND OUTREACH Rachael Orellana U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District FMA Conference September 5, 2018 PROJECT OVERVIEW Project Description Benefits Increase community participation in the Guidebook and website that provides a recovery process by providing resources for "one-stop" compendium of resources communities to use in the reduction of flood available to those affected from agencies risk after a wildfire. Provide information to prepare for and that are responsible for hazard respond to a flood after a wildfire which could recognition and recovery after a wildfire. reduce future expenditures from post-wildfire floods. Successes/Best Practices Documenting resources in a consolidated format helps state and local agencies know what resources are available to them after a wildfire. Multiple agencies are bringing diverse knowledge, expertise and resources to the table. POST-WILDFIRE GUIDE INTERAGENCY PROJECT CONTRIBUTIONS Additional Contributions From: USFS, USBLM, NRCS File Name GENERAL PRODUCTS 1.Detailed guidance document 2.Website mirroring guidance document 3.Postcard 4.Brochure TOPICS Coordinating local agency response Information on before, during, and after a wildfire Preparation for and response to a flood after a wildfire Consolidated resources for state/local agencies and residents Financial and funding tips Summary of post-fire natural hazards POST WILDFIRE WEBSITE Look and Feel: Simple Icons that create positive associations with content Access to awareness and recovery videos Advantage to website: communities affected by fire may be cut off from electricity, but most everyone has a smart phone www.readyforwildfire.org/postwildfire THOMAS FIRE AND THE 1-9 DEBRIS FLOW DECEMBER 2017 – JANUARY 2018 THOMAS FAYRAM, PE, CFM JON FRYE, PE, CFM SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL COMMUNICATION WE KNEW WE HAD A PROBLEM • Jan 5, 2018 - Press conference • Jan 7 – Initial maps received; EOC active and evacuation areas identified • Jan 8 – Evacuation announced • Storm intensity in burn area • predicted up to an inch per hour • received .86 inches in 15 minutes NOOZHAWK – JAN 7, 2018 “We need to organize and inform the public about a clear and present danger,” Santa Barbara County First District Supervisor Das Williams said. “These storms are predicted to cause conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property” in the county of Santa Barbara and are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment and facilities of the combined forces of Santa Barbara County Operational Area to combat,” the declaration said. “It’s a real risk that should be taken seriously,” Fayram said. “It’s critical that property owners and residents are aware of their environment, and understand where they are in relationship to the burn area and flood hazards.” INITIAL RISK IDENTIFICATION, ~JAN 5,2018 Posted Online So What Happened? • Message Not Received • Either not heard, or not heeded, misunderstood • Evacuation Fatigue • Magnitude hard to Communication - Messaging comprehend Thomas Fire and the 1‐9 Debris Flow December 2017 – January 2018 Photo Credit CNN Tom Fayram, PE,CFM Jon Frye, PE, CFM Santa Barbara County Flood Control District Photo Credit SBCFC Floodplain Management Association 2018 Annual Conference Timelines/Federal‐State‐Local Partnerships Local Emergency Operations BAER Team Watershed Emergency Response Team (WERT) Watershed Task Force (incl. BAER, WERT) Core Team Basin/Channel Clearing; Public Assistance Recovery Private Structure Reconstruction Structure Damages NUMBER OF NUMBER OF NUMBER OF TOTAL STRUCTURES STRUCTURES STRUCTURES NUMBER OF 60‐100% 10‐60% 1‐10% STRUCTURES DAMAGED* DAMAGED* DAMAGED* DAMAGED Total Structures with Damages 202 142 101 445 Within existingWithin existing FEMA FIRM special flood hazard area (A, AE, AO, AH, & VE Zones) 70 62 52 184 Within FEMA Recovery Mapping hazard area 141 122 89 352 A Water Year to Remember: Fire to Flood Reflections Panelists: Jeremy Lancaster Supervising Engineering Geologist California Geological Survey Rachael Orellana Flood Risk Program Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tom Fayram Deputy Director County of Santa Barbara Pubic Works Department Moderator: Melissa Weymiller Jon Frey Project Manager Engineering Manager Flood Risk Management Program Santa Barbara County U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Control District.
Recommended publications
  • Flash Point the Official Publication of the San Luis Obispo Fire Investigation Strike Team, Inc

    Flash Point the Official Publication of the San Luis Obispo Fire Investigation Strike Team, Inc

    Flash Point The Official Publication of the San Luis Obispo Fire Investigation Strike Team, Inc. In this issue Forensic Fire Death Investigation Class 2018 FFDIC Progress Report Proctor Profiles John Madden Awards Active Arson Cases Carr Fire Jeremy Stoke SLOFIST Executive Board John Madden, CEO Barb Kessel, CFO Dr. Elayne Pope, Chief of Train- ing Another successful class with live fire demonstrations in San Luis Obispo. Dr. Robert Kimsey, Secretary- Students from all over the world came to attend the week long class. A spe- Forensic Sciences Director cial thank you to all the proctors and logistical support staff who made this Tim Eckles, Chief of Safety another great workshop. Dennis Byrnes, Chief of Logistics Jeff Zimmerman. Editor SLOFIST is a 501 © (3) Non-profit organization Box 1041, Atascadero, CA 93423 Www.slofist.org Copyright 2018 SLOFIST Inc. Class Objectives Met with Great Results According to John Madden this was the best class so far. A special thank you SLOFIST Directors to all the proctors and logistical support staff who made this another great Jeremy Davis, Chairman of BOD workshop. Hours of preparation made the program run smoothly . The pro- Eric Emmanuelle, Director posed dates for next years class is June 24-28, 2019, please mark your cal- Jeremy Kosick, Director, Web Master endars and plan on attending. Dr. Alison Galloway, Director Several students had the op- Danielle Wishon, Director portunity to explore career options in both the fire ser- vices and law enforcement fields. Intern Lovey Corneil got to suit up and extinguish one of the live burns and at- tack a fire with CDC fire crew in full PPE.
  • Palms to Pines Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan

    Palms to Pines Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan

    Palms to Pines Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan PALMS TO PINES STATE SCENIC HIGHWAY CALIFORNIA STATE ROUTES 243 AND 74 June 2012 This document was produced by USDA Forest Service Recreation Solutions Enterprise Team with support from the Federal Highway Administration and in partnership with the USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region, the Bureau of Land Management, the California Department of Transportation, California State University, Chico Research Foundation and many local partners. The USDA, the BLM, FHWA and State of California are equal opportunity providers and employers. In accordance with Federal law, U.S. Department of Agriculture policy and U.S. Department of Interior policy, this institution is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720- 5964 (voice and TDD). Table of Contents Chapter 1 – The Palms to Pines Scenic Byway .........................................................................1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Benefits of National Scenic Byway Designation .......................................................................... 2 Corridor Management Planning .................................................................................................
  • Unit Strategic Fire Plan

    Unit Strategic Fire Plan

    Unit Strategic Fire Plan CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire May 2020 CAL FIRE/Riverside Unit Strategic Fire Plan Page 1 Table of Contents SIGNATURE PAGE .........................................................................................3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................4 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW UNIT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................6 UNIT PREPAREDNESSAND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES ............................... 12 SECTION II: COLLABORATION DEVELOPMENT TEAM .................................................................................................................... 14 SECTION III: VALUES AT RISK IDENTIFICATION OF VALUES AT RISK ............................................................ 17 COMMUNITIES AT RISK ................................................................................. 22 SECTION IV: PRE‐FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FIRE PREVENTION ........................................................................................ 24 ENGINEERING & STRUCTURE IGNITABILITY................................................... 27 INFORMATIONANDEDUCATION ................................................................... 28 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ..................................................................... 29 SECTION V: PRE‐FIRE MANAGEMENT TACTICS DIVISION / BATTALION / PROGRAM PLANS .................................................. 41 APPENDIX A: HIGH PRIORITY PRE‐FIRE PROJECTS .......................................
  • Cold, Powerful Thanksgiving Storm Begins Hitting Southern California Today – San Bernardino Sun

    Cold, Powerful Thanksgiving Storm Begins Hitting Southern California Today – San Bernardino Sun

    11/27/2019 Cold, powerful Thanksgiving storm begins hitting Southern California today – San Bernardino Sun NEWSCALIFORNIA NEWS Cold, powerful Thanksgiving storm begins hitting Southern California today Graphic courtesy of the National Weather Service By CITY NEWS SERVICE || [email protected] || PUBLISHED: November 27, 2019 at 5:56 am || UPDATED:UPDATED: November 27, 2019 at 6:01 am https://www.sbsun.com/2019/11/27/cold-powerful-thanksgiving-storm-begins-hitting-southern-california-today/ 1/4 11/27/2019 Cold, powerful Thanksgiving storm begins hitting Southern California today – San Bernardino Sun LOS ANGELES — A storm out of the Gulf of Alaska will slide into Southern California today — Wednesday, Nov. 27 — and unleash rain, snow and cold winds through Thanksgiving while causing rough seas and wreaking havoc on thethe region’sregion’s roads,roads, forecastersforecasters said.said. A winter storm warning signifying an expectation of difficult travel conditions will be in effect in the San Gabriel Mountains from 4 a.m. today until 4 a.m. Friday. Most mountain areas will get 6 to 12 inches of snow — including 3-6 inches in thethe Grapevine,Grapevine, whichwhich couldcould snarlsnarl InterstateInterstate 55 —— butbut upup toto 2424 inchesinches ofof snowsnow isis expected to accumulate at higher elevations. Graphic courtesy of the National Weather Service The snow level will be at between 5,000 and 7,000 feet this morning but dip down to 3,000 feet tonight, according to the NWS. “Travel could be very difficult to impossible,” warned an NWS statement. “The hazardous conditions could result in temporary road closures. Gusty winds could bring down tree branches and cause power outages.” A winter storm warning is also scheduled until 10 p.m.
  • Attachment a ‐ Forest Service Wildfire, NEPA, and Salvage Summary

    Attachment a ‐ Forest Service Wildfire, NEPA, and Salvage Summary

    Attachment A ‐ Forest Service Wildfire, NEPA, and Salvage Summary Fiscal Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2007‐2016 Number of Fires 1 63 64 53 33 66 79 56 56 127 110 707 Total fire acres on NFS 2 1,751,118 1,326,893 549,108 211,327 1,489,029 2,411,413 1,141,353 741,465 1,587,843 1,038,686 12,248,235 High severity acres on NFS 3 842,658 368,595 268,944 76,192 619,020 809,720 513,957 265,045 489,668 397,654 4,651,453 Number of NEPA decisions identified 4 129 Acres of salvage planned in NEPA 5 218 17,255 2,134 14,010 22,761 28,937 13,809 13,264 112,388 Number of NEPA decisions litigated 6 125110332422 Litigation cases won by USFS 7 013110131112 Litigation cases lost by USFS 8 1120001011 7 Litigation cases pending 9 0000001002 3 Acres of salvage reported accomplished 10 328 2,665 8,125 3,464 8,774 6,916 11,672 19,792 16,926 21,234 99,896 1 Fires burning more than 1,000 acres on NFS land 10 Salvage harvest activity records identified as awarded in Forest Service Activity 2 Total acres inside fire perimeter on NFS land Tracking System (FACTS) by GIS analysis of fire perimeters. 3 Classified as greater than 75% mortality using Rapid Assessment of Vegetation Condition after Wildfire (RAVG) 4 Identified by fire salvage keyword search in PALS (Planning Appeals and Disclaimer: Only the litigation data is believed to be 100% complete and Litigation System) or reported with sale activity records in Forest Service systems accurate.
  • AN ANALYSIS of WILDFIRE IMPACTS on CLIMATE CHANGE By

    AN ANALYSIS of WILDFIRE IMPACTS on CLIMATE CHANGE By

    AN ANALYSIS OF WILDFIRE IMPACTS ON CLIMATE CHANGE By: Taylor Gilson Mentor: Dr. Elaine Fagner 1 Abstract Abstract: The western United States (U.S.). has recently seen an increase in wildfires that destroyed communities and lives. This researcher seeks to examine the impact of wildfires on climate change by examining recent studies on air quality and air emissions produced by wildfires, and their impact on climate change. Wildfires cause temporary large increases in outdoor airborne particles, such as particulate matter 2.5 (PM 2.5) and particulate matter 10(PM 10). Large wildfires can increase air pollution over thousands of square kilometers (Berkley University, 2021). The researcher will be conducting this research by analyzing PM found in the atmosphere, as well as analyzing air quality reports in the Southwestern portion of the U.S. The focus of this study is to examine the air emissions after wildfires have occurred in Yosemite National Park; and the research analysis will help provide the scientific community with additional data to understand the severity of wildfires and their impacts on climate change. Project Overview and Hypothesis This study examines the air quality from prior wildfires in Yosemite National Park. This research effort will help provide additional data for the scientific community and local, state, and federal agencies to better mitigate harmful levels of PM in the atmosphere caused by forest fires. The researcher hypothesizes that elevated PM levels in the Yosemite National Park region correlate with wildfires that are caused by natural sources such as lightning strikes and droughts. Introduction The researcher will seek to prove the linkage between wildfires and PM.
  • Fiscal Year 2019/20 Proposed Operating Budget

    Fiscal Year 2019/20 Proposed Operating Budget

    Fiscal Year 2019/20 Proposed Operating Budget This page intentionally left blank City Council Lily Mei, Mayor Raj Salwan, Vice Mayor Vinnie Bacon, Councilmember At-large Teresa Keng, Councilmember, District 1 Rick Jones, Councilmember, District 2 Jenny Kassan, Councilmember, District 3 Yang Shao, Councilmember, Disctrict 4 City Executive Staff Mark Danaj, City Manager Harvey Levine, City Attorney Karena Shackelford, Assistant City Manager Brian Stott, Assistant City Manager Christina Briggs, Economic Development Director Marilyn Crane, Interim Chief Technology Officer/IT Director Allen DeMers, Human Resources Director Susan Gauthier, City Clerk Curtis Jacobson, Fire Chief Hans Larsen, Public Works Director David Persselin, Finance Director Kimberly Petersen, Police Chief Dan Schoenholz, Community Development Director Suzanne Shenfil, Human Services Director Suzanne Wolf, Community Services Director Budget Team Mike Sung, Deputy Director of Finance Chun Chan, Management Analyst II Mario Rosas, Management Analyst II Elisa Chang, Administrative Analyst/Graphic Artist City of Fremont 2019/20 Proposed Operating Budget | i The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) of the United States and Canada presented an award for Distinguished Budget Presentation to the City of Fremont for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2018. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan and as a communications device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. This is the twenty-second consecutive year the City has earned the award. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements.
  • 2018 FIRE DEPARTMENT COMPARISON: Call Average Per Fire Agency Annual Budget Number of Stations Calls Per Year Population Total Personnel Station

    2018 FIRE DEPARTMENT COMPARISON: Call Average Per Fire Agency Annual Budget Number of Stations Calls Per Year Population Total Personnel Station

    IDYLLWILD FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 2018/19 FY First Qtr Review OBJECTIVES: • 18/19 FY Department Overview: • Meeting Our Mission. ✓Ensuring the Highest Quality and Professional Service. ❑ Review response data. ❑ Review the IFPD Training and Certification program. ❑ Discuss our Focus and Direction. ❑ Looking Ahead. ✓Financial Responsibility, Efficiency and Reliability. ❑ Revenue review. ❑ Expenditure review. ❑ Fee for service review. (ambulance/mutual aid) ❑ Parity review. OUR MISSION The mission of the Idyllwild Fire Protection District is to protect lives, property and the environment through the provision of comprehensive integrated “All Risk” Fire Protection, Emergency Medical Services and other Emergency Services that result in social, economic and environmental benefits for the people of Idyllwild. OUR CITIZENS ARE OUR MISSION IFPD Response Data (10yr avrg. ) • Medical Aid Service 676 77% • Fire 38 5% • Hazardous Conditions 26 3% • Public Service 64 8% • False Alarm 37 4% • Special Incident type/Other 27 3% • TOTALS: 868 100% IFPD RESPONSE DATA: 2017/18 Response Data 2018/19 Response Data 5.48% 2.74% 6.04% 1.13% False Alarm Special Inc. False Alarm Special Inc. 6.72% 4.15% Public Service Public Service 3.24% 3.40% Hazardous Cond Hazardous Cond 6.72% 7.55% Fire Fire 75.09% 77.74% EMS EMS RESPONSE DATA (CONT.) • Average call Statistics: 2018/19 • Daily : % of overlapping calls: 39.57% ✓ Incident Average – 2.38 Dispatch Times ✓ Daily Transport Average – 1.5 Dispatch to Responding: ▪ Monthly : EMS Calls: .42 sec. ✓ Incident Average – 72 Fire Calls: 1:01 min/sec. ✓ Monthly Transport Average – 44 ▪ Annually : Dispatch to on Scene: ✓ Incident Average – 800-1100 (868 – 10yr.
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America

    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America

    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.
  • Categorical Exclusion Record

    Categorical Exclusion Record

    1 Decision Memorandum on Action and for Application of: Categorical Exclusion 1.12 Evaluation of Pinyon Removal Effects Typical of a Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fuels Reduction Project Mono Basin, CA CER Number: CA-170-05-35 U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Bishop Field Office Mono County, California Purpose and Need for the Action The BLM Bishop Field Office has identified a critical resource management need to develop ecologically sound and cost-effective fuel treatment prescriptions for areas where pinyon-juniper woodlands have expanded into sagebrush steppe during the 1900s (Miller et al. 1999, Miller 2000). The vegetative fuels of such areas, including the Mono Basin, are now well outside their natural range of variability for the current climate conditions, thus making these areas highly susceptible to large, high-intensity wildland fires. Many of these encroaching pinyon stands are also within designated Wildland/Urban Interface (WUI) areas, placing residents, homesites, and other structures at significant risk. In just the past five years, several large, high-intensity wildland fires have burned through pinyon – juniper areas of the eastern Sierra, most notably in the Walker – Coleville area of northern Mono County. The fuels conditions (Fire Regime/Condition Class 2 and 3) associated with this proposed project are similar to those that existed in the Walker – Coleville area and other areas of the eastern Sierra prior to these recent large, high-intensity wildland fires. The management of these pinyon-juniper fuels, especially where communities and homesites are threatened, is one of the top priorities for the BLM and other agencies in the southwestern Great Basin and the eastern Sierra Nevada mountains.
  • FY 2013, the Kaibab NF Experienced a Large Increase in Timber Volume Sold, from 8,000 Ccf (Cubic Feet) in 2012 to 43,875 Ccf, in 2013

    FY 2013, the Kaibab NF Experienced a Large Increase in Timber Volume Sold, from 8,000 Ccf (Cubic Feet) in 2012 to 43,875 Ccf, in 2013

    Kaibab National Forest Forest Plan Monitoring Report Fiscal Year 2013 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. All cover photos credit U.S. Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Kaibab National Forest. Clockwise from top left:. Introduction The Monitoring Plan for the Kaibab National Forest (NF) outlined in the original 1988 Forest Plan identifies 58 items in 11 categories (timber, protection, range, recreation, heritage resources, wilderness, visual resources, soil, land management planning, wildlife, and facilities) to be tracked as measures of the effectiveness of management actions under the Plan. Each year, select items from the above categories are discussed in the monitoring report in order to provide information on monitoring efforts and accomplishments by resource or concern area. This report documents activities occurring during fiscal year (FY) 2013. Monitoring reports from previous years can be accessed at http://fs.usda.gov/goto/kaibab/planning or provided upon request.
  • Safety Element

    Safety Element

    TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 6: Safety Element 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND CONTENT ...................................................................................................................... 1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................... 2 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER DOCUMENTS .............................................................................................................. 3 Other General Plan Elements .................................................................................................................... 3 Area Plans .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan ....................................................................................... 3 RELATIONSHIP TO THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ....................................................................... 4 HAZARD REDUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2. ISSUES AND POLICIES ............................................................................................................................ 6 CODE CONFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS