DOCSLIB.ORG

11. BIBLICAL EPIC: 1 Kings Notes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
11. BIBLICAL EPIC: 1 Kings Notes 11. BIBLICAL EPIC: 1 Kings Notes rown 1 Kings 1: David was very old. His son Adonijah exalted himself as king. When David heard he told Zadok and Nathan to anoint Solomon as king. 1-2 Kings, divided by convenience, describe the period of the monarchy after David in ancient Israel (970–586 BC). David’s parting speech to Solomon in ch. 2, drawing richly from Deuteronomy, sets the agenda. Beginning with Solomon, and then all the succeeding kings of Israel and Judah, the kings are weighed in relation to the Mosaic law code and found wanting. Israel’s sinfulness eventually leads to the exile to Babylon in 586 BC, but there remains hope because God’s chosen royal line has not come to an end (2 Kings 25:27-30), and God remains ready to forgive those who are repentant. The books are not merely a chronicle of events, but history from God’s perspective and how He is directing all history toward a goal. The Bible is a story about God and how His Kingdom will come. Every “son of David” that is found wanting adds to the yearning for a greater David who will sit on David’s throne forever. We could summarize the book in this way: “Ruling justly and wisely depends on obeying God’s word, and disobeying has serious consequences.” • 1:1-4. David in His Old Age. David’s waning life is seen in his inability to get warm. Ancient medical practice provided warmth for the sick by having a healthy person “lie beside” them. While this was the main purpose for bringing in Abishag the Shunammite (an Issacharite town), the context may also imply that the aged David was no longer able to be intimate with a woman. In the eyes of his detractors, this would be taken as proof that David lacked the fitness and strength to continue as king. Once known, this may have encouraged Adonijah’s attempt to seize the throne. • 1:5-10. Adonijah Sets Himself Up as King. Adonijah is David’s oldest surviving son (fourth overall), and he now exalts himself as king in his father’s place. In this, he behaves like his dead older brother, Absalom, both of whom are in part the product of parental negligence and indulgence; David never held him accountable for his actions. Some of David’s loyal followers, such as Joab and Abiathar, joined with Adonijah. His seizing the throne contrasts with David, who waited patiently for God to raise him to office, even refusing to take Saul’s life (1 Sam 16-31). God rejects those who appoint themselves as kings without His approval. Adonijah’s great feast in v. 9 amounted to an impromptu coronation, and for obvious reasons the guest list excludes the anti-Adonijah faction (vv. 7-8) and Solomon. • 1:11-28. Nathan and Bathsheba Before David. With Adonijah’s coup already in motion, someone with sufficient standing to be accepted by the people had to initiate a counter movement for Solomon or the throne would be lost. Nathan, the prophet, assumed this role. He warned Bathsheba that the penalty for inaction could be death for herself and Solomon. Bathsheba raised three issues to arouse David to action: (1) By God’s will David had promised the throne to Solomon. (2) Adonijah had proclaimed himself king without David’s public support or knowledge. (3) She pointed out that she and Solomon would be regarded as criminals if David did not act. Nathan then came and reinforced the points Bathsheba had made to the king. That Bathsheba is recalled indicates she had left previously. • 1:29-53. Solomon Anointed King. David responded with the orders that legitimized Solomon’s succession. Unlike Adonijah, Solomon does nothing to promote himself as king. The mule was the traditional mount of honor for kings at that time (a custom still remembered as late as Zech 9:9; cf. Jesus in Matt 21:1-11). To ride the king’s mule was to claim the throne. The proper religious personnel were present to anoint Solomon, which was done by the king’s command and in the presence of the king’s private army. These facts were sufficient for the people of Jerusalem to choose Solomon over Adonijah. David’s words in v. 49 allude to Nathan’s prophecy that David would found a lasting royal dynasty (2 Sam 7:12). In fear, Adonijah’s supporters scatter, while Adonijah clings to the altar (a holy place), hoping it will protect him from Solomon’s vengeance. Surprisingly, Adonijah was temporarily given pardon. 1 Kings 2: David charged Solomon to keep the law and to punish Joab and Shimei. Then David died. Solomon had Adonijah, Joab and Shimei executed. • 2:1-9. David’s Instructions to Solomon. Sensing his imminent death, David prepares Solomon to reign as king of Israel with words that echo not only God’s words to Joshua (Josh 1:6-9), but God’s vision of the ideal king given in Deuteronomy (Deut 17:14-20). Solomon is to exhibit faithful obedience to the law of Moses, and so reap the benefits of God’s promise in the Davidic covenant of a permanent dynasty. David also instructs him to deal with Joab and Shimei, lest leftover bloodguilt harm Solomon’s kingdom. Barzillai, meanwhile, is to be shown kindness. • 2:10-12. The Death of David. The metaphor of sleep hints at the expectation of awakening sometime in the future, and “with his fathers” hints that previous generations also join in this hope, and that David is somehow now with them. David reigned over Israel for forty years, and died in 970 BC. The story now transitions from David to Solomon. • 2:13-46. Solomon’s Reign Established. Solomon consolidates his hold on the kingdom by heading off threats from Adonijah, Adonijah’s supporters (Abiathar the priest, Joab), and Shimei. Though Adonijah was previously spared, his request for Abishag is perceived by Solomon as a conspiracy to the throne and he is executed. Bathsheba’s role seems either incredibly naïve or stunningly cunning. As for Abiathar, David’s faithful priest (cf. 1:19, 25), he receives exile rather than death for supporting Adonijah. As a descendant of Eli, this exile fulfills Samuel’s judgment on Eli the priest and his house (1 Sam 2:27-36; cf. 1 Kings 4:4). As for Joab, who had murdered two innocent men, Abner and Amasa, he is executed without a trial. Solomon moves next to eliminate Shimei, who had cursed David as he fled from Absalom. When Shimei ignores Solomon’s order not to go from Jerusalem to any other place (v. 36), Solomon orders his execution (v. 46). He thus proves himself to be a “wise” king (vv. 6, 9), but it is a dubious kind of wisdom. 1 Kings 3: Solomon married Pharaoh's daughter. He asked the LORD for discernment. Two women came before him and he judged between them wisely. • 3:1-15. Solomon’s Prayer for Wisdom. Although a kind of wisdom has already guided Solomon in his treatment of those who were a threat to him (2:6, 9), this chapter confirms that in fact he still lacks a truly “wise and discerning mind” (v. 12). Solomon’s marriage alliance with Pharaoh is yet another dubious act (violating Deut 17:17). Moses had warned that such intermarriage could lead the people to serve other gods. This becomes all too real for Solomon (1 Kings 11:3-4). Even though Solomon “loved the LORD” (v. 3), he is a king with a divided heart, failing to keep the Law of Moses wholeheartedly as David had instructed (2:1-4). Furthermore, the continuation and proliferation of “high places” of worship (as opposed to the one place of worship described in Deuteronomy 12) is one of the main concerns of the authors of 1-2 Kings. Apparently, a multiplicity of worship sites was thought normal prior to the building of the temple. Later, royal toleration of the high places became the basis for critiquing kings (11:7; 15:14; 22:43; 2 Kings 12:3; 15: 4; cf. Jer 19:5). Solomon begins by tolerating worship of the LORD at these places and ends up being drawn into full-blown apostasy (1 Kings 11:7-8), as also later do Israel and Judah (e.g., 12:28-31; 2 Kings 21:3-9). Against this historical backdrop comes God’s offer in v. 5 “Ask what I should give you.” In response, Solomon expresses inadequacy in view of the great task that confronts him. Although he has used wisdom before in dealing with affairs of state, now he confesses basic ignorance and asks for an “understanding mind.” God is pleased with Solomon and grants his request. Solomon’s wisdom is a supernatural gift from God. It is neither innate nor acquired by patient hard work, utilizing careful observation and self-discipline (as it is explicitly in much of Proverbs). In possession of such wisdom, Solomon was unparalleled in Israelite history. Since Solomon did not ask for long life or riches or the life of his enemies, God gave him what he did not ask for, “both riches and honor” (v. 13), and promised to lengthen his days. Solomon’s request marked a major cultural shift in Hebrew life, a shift to peaceful values involving wisdom and skill rather than military craft (like David, the “man of war,” 1 Chron 28:3). • 3:16-28. Solomon’s Wisdom is Confirmed and Seen.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “King Selection” 1 Kings 1-2 January 8, 2017 INTRODUCTION: As The
    “King Selection” 1 Kings 1-2 January 8, 2017 INTRODUCTION: As the book of Kings opens, Israel is at a time of uncertainty. The great King David is obviously fading and not long for this life. That’s the point of the opening verses of the book. In the words of one commentary, David is old and cold. His servants try covering him with more clothes, but he is still cold. Then they have another idea. They want to add to his harem the most beautiful woman they can find. Something like a beauty pageant is held, and a woman by the name of Abishag is selected as the most beautiful young woman of the nation. They reason that if she can’t get his blood flowing again, nothing can. But it doesn’t work, for we read that “the king knew her not,” a common euphemism in the Scriptures for sexual intimacy. So David has declined to the point that everyone knows his death is not far away. But a successor has not been named. God had already declared through Nathan the prophet that a son of David would sit on his throne (2 Sam. 7:12), but it was not revealed exactly which son it would be. Two sons compete for the crown in these first two chapters, Adonijah and Solomon. One is the wrong king and the other God’s anointed. As is the case with us, everything depends on having the right king. To make a wrong choice leads to catastrophic results, while making the right choice leads to the fulfillment of our strongest and best longings.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Defeats the Dragon
    THE REVELATION OF JOHN Bible Study 31 Study by Lorin L Cranford Text: Rev. 12:7-12 All rights reserved © QUICK LINKS 1. What the text meant. Exegesis of the Text: Historical Aspects: A. War between Michael and Satan, vv. 7-9 External History B. Declaration of victory, vv. 10-12 Internal History Literary Aspects: Genre 2. What the text means. Literary Setting Literary Structure Michael Defeats the Dragon Greek NT Gute Nachricht Bibel NRSV NLT 7 Καὶ ἐγένετο πόλεμος ἐν 7 Dann brach im Himmel 7 And war broke out in 7 Then there was war τῷ οὐρανῷ, ὁ Μιχαὴλ καὶ οἱ ein Krieg aus. Michael mit heaven; Michael and his an- in heaven. Michael and the ἄγγελοι αὐτοῦ τοῦ πολεμῆσαι seinen Engeln kämpfte gegen gels fought against the drag- angels under his command μετὰ τοῦ δράκοντος. καὶ ὁ den Drachen. Der Drache mit on. The dragon and his angels fought the dragon and his δράκων ἐπολέμησεν καὶ οἱ seinen Engeln wehrte sich; 8 fought back, 8 but they were angels. 8 And the dragon ἄγγελοι αὐτοῦ, 8 καὶ οὐκ aber er konnte nicht stand- defeated, and there was no lost the battle and was forced ἴσχυσεν οὐδὲ τόπος εὑρέθη halten. Samt seinen Engeln longer any place for them in out of heaven. 9 This great αὐτῶν ἔτι ἐν τῷ οὐρανῷ. musste er seinen Platz im heaven. 9 The great dragon dragon -- the ancient serpent 9 καὶ ἐβλήθη ὁ δράκων ὁ Himmel räumen. 9 Der große was thrown down, that ancient called the Devil, or Satan, μέγας, ὁ ὄφις ὁ ἀρχαῖος, ὁ Drache wurde hinunterg- serpent, who is called the the one deceiving the whole καλούμενος Διάβολος καὶ estürzt! Er ist die alte Sch- Devil and Satan, the deceiver world -- was thrown down to ὁ Σατανᾶς, ὁ πλανῶν τὴν lange, die auch Teufel oder of the whole world—he was the earth with all his angels.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 11 ELIJAH DEFEATS 450 PROPHETS of BAAL with 1 PRAYER Memory Verse: Psalm 54:1-2 God, Save Me Because of Who You Are
    Q7 – God is Good at Victory! Parent Teaching Guide God wins the victory! We are studying Old Testament battle stories. These stories show us over and over again that God has the power and God wins the victory for His people when they follow His commandments (have faith in Him). We will study Jesus’ triumph over death, which brings us the victory of salvation. We can be victorious if we remain faithful to God and to the sacrifice of His son. God never promises that our lives will be easy. He does promise us victory through Christ if we trust Him. Date: Dec 13-19, 2020 Lesson 11 ELIJAH DEFEATS 450 PROPHETS OF BAAL WITH 1 PRAYER Memory Verse: Psalm 54:1-2 God, save me because of who You are. By Your strength show that I am innocent. Hear my prayer, God. Listen to what I say. Text: 1 Kings 18 King Ahab and Queen Jezebel were very wicked. They did not worship God, they worshiped Baal. When the prophet Elijah went to them and told them of their sin, they thought the prophets of Baal could defeat God’s prophet. God was able to light the alter even after it had been soaked with water. Baal could not. Isn’t God powerful! Talk to your child about God’s power. He can defeat any false god is we only let him. If we pray and let Him have control, He will defeat our enemies and keep us safe. Facts to Know PRAISE & PRAYER Show pictures of people praying.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LAST DAYS of DAVID 2 Samuel 21, 23, 24 and 1 Kings 1 and 2
    THE LAST DAYS OF DAVID 2 Samuel 21, 23, 24 and 1 Kings 1 and 2 Act 1: Act 2: Act 3: Narrator Narrator Narrator David David David Joshua Joab Joab Gibeonite 1 Gad, the prophet Adonijah A prophet Josheb, a mighty man Nathan, the prophet Gibeonite 2 Eleazar, a mighty man Bathsheba Rizpah Shammah, a mighty man Solomon Araunah, a Jebusite Benaiah, an army general Jonathan, Abiathar the priest’s son ACT 1: The Gibeonites are avenged NARRATOR: The Bible records several rather odd stories that occurred towards the end of David’s life. The first one involves a people group called the Gibeonites. Back in the time of Joshua, just after Jericho had been destroyed, the Canannites living in the city of Gibeon decided that they would try to avoid being exterminated. They had heard the rumor that the God of the Israelites had told his people to totally wipe out everyone living in the land of Canaan. They believed this would come true and they were very afraid. They decided to try to trick Joshua into making a peace treaty with them. The messengers they sent to Joshua were wearing old clothes and carrying dry and moldy food. JOSHUA: Who are you and where do you come from? GIBEONITE 1: We have come from a distant land. When we started our journey our clothes were new and our food was fresh. You can see how worn out and old they are now. That is because we have been traveling so long to get here. However, we have heard stories about all the things your God has done for you.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-And-2 Kings
    FROM DAVID TO EXILE 1 & 2 Kings by Daniel J. Lewis © copyright 2009 by Diakonos, Inc. Troy, Michigan United States of America 2 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Composition and Authorship ...................................................................................................................... 5 Structure ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Theological Motifs ..................................................................................................................................... 7 The Kingship of Solomon (1 Kings 1-11) .....................................................................................................13 Solomon Succeeds David as King (1:1—2:12) .........................................................................................13 The Purge (2:13-46) ..................................................................................................................................16 Solomon‟s Wisdom (3-4) ..........................................................................................................................17 Building the Temple and the Palace (5-7) .................................................................................................20 The Dedication of the Temple (8) .............................................................................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • The Higher Aspects of Greek Religion. Lectures Delivered at Oxford and In
    BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIET OF Henirg m. Sage 1891 .A^^^ffM3. islm^lix.. 5931 CornelJ University Library BL 25.H621911 The higher aspects of Greek religion.Lec 3 1924 007 845 450 The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924007845450 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES 1911 THE HIBBERT LECTURES SECOND SERIES THE HIGHER ASPECTS OF GREEK RELIGION LECTURES DELIVERED AT OXFORD AND IN LONDON IN APRIL AND MAY igii BY L. R. FARNELL, D.Litt. WILDE LECTURER IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD LONDON WILLIAMS AND NORGATE GARDEN, W.C. 14 HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT 1912 CONTENTS Lecture I GENERAL FEATURES AND ORIGINS OF GREEK RELIGION Greek religion mainly a social-political system, 1. In its earliest " period a " theistic creed, that is^ a worship of personal individual deities, ethical personalities rather than mere nature forces, 2. Anthrqgomorphism its predominant bias, 2-3. Yet preserving many primitive features of " animism " or " animatism," 3-5. Its progress gradual without violent break with its distant past, 5-6. The ele- ment of magic fused with the religion but not predominant, 6-7. Hellenism and Hellenic religion a blend of two ethnic strains, one North-Aryan, the other Mediterranean, mainly Minoan-Mycenaean, 7-9. Criteria by which we can distinguish the various influences of these two, 9-1 6. The value of Homeric evidence, 18-20. Sum- mary of results, 21-24. Lecture II THE RELIGIOUS BOND AND MORALITY OF THE FAMILY The earliest type of family in Hellenic society patrilinear, 25-27.
    [Show full text]
  • Innocent Blood — Part One
    ONE SESSION SESSION INNOCENT BLOOD — PART ONE Tel Megiddo, where this session was filmed, is located at a strategic mountain pass overlooking the Plain of Jezreel, which made the city of Megiddo one of the most important cities in ancient Israel. The Via Maris, the main trade route between the dominant world pow- ers of the day — Egypt and the Mesopotamian empires of Assyria, Babylon, and Persia — crossed the mountains at Megiddo. So who- ever controlled the city could exert great power over world trade and have significant influence over world culture. In fact, the Via Maris was one source of Solomon’s wealth because God gave him the political might to control the key cities along that trade route — Hazor, Gezer, and of course Megiddo. Some scholars believe that because of Megiddo’s strategic location more battles have been fought in the Jezreel Valley below it than in any other place in the world. But in the context of the Bible, Megiddo repre- sents more than political control, more than economic and cultural influence. It also represents the battle for spiritual control of the minds and hearts of people — the ongoing battle between good and evil. That battle was waged when the people of ancient Israel lived in the land, it continues to this day, and it will culminate in the bat- tle of Har Megiddo, or Armageddon. So let’s take a closer look at the significance of Tel Megiddo. Centuries before the Israelites settled in the Promised Land (from about 2950 – 2350 BC), Megiddo was a prominent “high place” where the p eople of Canaan worshiped their fertility god, Baal, and his supposed mistress, Asherah.
    [Show full text]
  • PHOENICIANS - Oxford Reference
    PHOENICIANS - Oxford Reference http://www.oxfordreference.com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/view/10.1093... The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion (2 ed.) Edited by Adele Berlin and Maxine Grossman Publisher: Oxford University Press Print Publication Date: 2011 Print ISBN-13: 9780199730049 Published online: 2011 Current Online Version: 2011 eISBN: 9780199759279 Greek name for the peoples of the Levant (greater Canaan), especially the coastal region, and used by scholars today to refer to the Canaanites of such major city-states as Byblos, Tyre, and Sidon from c. 1200 BCE onward. The Bible portrays the Phoenicians as being on friendly political terms with the Israelites. For example, King Hiram I of Tyre (c.980 BCE) made a treaty with David and Solomon, and the Phoenicians supplied the architects, workmen, and raw materials (cedar of Lebanon, especially) for the construction of David’s and Solomon’s palaces and for the Temple in Jerusalem (2 Sm. 5.11; 1 Kgs. 5.15–32, 7.13–14). The detailed biblical description of the Temple dovetails with the data from the archeological discovery of various Phoenician temples, clearly demonstrating that Solomon’s Temple was built according to the design of a Phoenician-Canaanite prototype. Solomon and Hiram also had joint maritime ventures from the Red Sea port of Ezion-geber (near Elat) to develop trade with regions to the far south and east (perhaps East Africa and India; 1 Kgs. 9.26–28, 10.11, 10.22). Later, King Ethbaal I of Sidon (c.880 BCE) appears to have entered into a treaty with Omri, marked by the marriage of their children, Ahab, later king of Israel, and Jezebel, the Phoenician princess (1 Kgs.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on 666 in the Old Testament
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Faculty of Informatics - Papers (Archive) Sciences 6-1999 Observations on 666 in the Old Testament M. G. Michael University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Michael, M. G.: Observations on 666 in the Old Testament 1999. https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/672 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Observations on 666 in the Old Testament Disciplines Physical Sciences and Mathematics Publication Details This article was originally published as Michael, MG, Observations on 666 in the Old Testament, Bulletin of Biblical Studies, 18, January-June 1999, 33-39. This journal article is available at Research Online: https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/672 RULLeTIN OF RIRLICkL STuDies Vol. 18, January - June 1999, Year 28 CONTENTS Prof. George Rigopoulos, ...~ Obituary for Oscar Cullmann 5 .., Prof. Savas Agourides, The Papables of Preparedness in Matthew's Gospel 18 Michael G. Michael, Observations on 666 in the Old Testament. 33 Prof. George Rigopoulos, Jesus and the Greeks (Exegetical Approach of In. 12,20-26) (Part B'). .. 40 Zoltan Hamar, Grace more immovable than the mountains 53 Raymond Goharghi, The land of Geshen in Egypt. The Ixos 99 Bookreviews: Prof. S. Agourides: Jose Saramagu, The Gospel according to Jesus - Karen Armstrong, In the Beginning, A new Interpretation ojthe Book ojGenesis ; 132 EDITIONS «ARTOS ZOES» ATHENS RULLeTIN OF RIRLIC~L STuDies Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Why I Am an Atheist by Frank Berman, 1963 Frank Berman
    University of Mississippi eGrove Speeches and Letters to the Editor James W. Silver Collection 1963 Why I Am an Atheist by Frank Berman, 1963 Frank Berman Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jws_spch Recommended Citation Berman, Frank, "Why I Am an Atheist by Frank Berman, 1963" (1963). Speeches and Letters to the Editor. 9. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/jws_spch/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the James W. Silver Collection at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Speeches and Letters to the Editor by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. & WHY I AM AN ATHEIST Nyc 3/ Frank Berman 10o:S1 THE ATHEIST I became an atheist and here is the reason why, I searched everywhere and found no hell or angel's sky. I read the Bible through and through, Something religious folks very seldom do. It's superstitions and benedictions, Its atrocities and self contradictions. And I read it diligently through all its pages, Its nonsense, mythology and sayings of its sages. Final~y, I read Thomas Paine's illustrious "AGE OF REASON," and l~ke a spark it came to me "The Bible is intellectual Treason." MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING Day by day, year after year, Millions cringe and crawlin religious fear, Worshipping the God of some biblical creed; That shows no sign of giving care or heed. A god no logic or science is able to find, An elusive creation of the bewildered mind. Some worship him standing and some by kneeling, Some by jumping, rolling or by reeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Were the Daughters of Allah?
    WHO WERE THE DAUGHTERS OF ALLAH? By DONNA RANDSALU B.A., University of British Columbia,1982. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (RELIGIOUS STUDIES) We accept this thesis—as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September 1988 © Donna Kristin Randsalu, 1988 V In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of £gLlfr/OU^ £TUO>eS> The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date Per- n} DE-6(3/81) ABSTRACT Who were the Daughters of Allah, the three Arabian goddesses mentioned in the Qur'an and venerated by the pagan Arabs prior to the rise of Islam, and who since have vanished into obscurity? Can we reconstruct information about these goddesses by reference to earlier goddesses of the Near East? It is our intention to explore this possibility through an examination of their predecessors in view of the links between the Fertile Crescent and the Arabian Peninsula. Moving back in time from the seventh century A.D. (Arabia) through the Hellenistic Period (Syro/Phoenicia 300 B.C.-A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • A. India and the Old Testament
    CHAPTER SEVEN INDIA AND THE WEST IN ANTIQUITY Geographically speaking, the terms "Asia," "East," and "India" were imprecise in the European imagination of antiquity. Before the age of the great discoveries, these terms were used so interchangeably that Egypt was sometimes pictured in maps as situated in Asia, which stood as a synonym for India.1 Sometimes Parthia included India as well. This means that when Matthew speaks about the magi from the East, it is possible that he means India; so also when the Acts of the Apostles describes the nationalities of the God-fearing Jews who were in Jerusalem for the Pentecost, he probably includes Indians among the people from Asia and Parthia (Acts 2:9-10). In spite of their lack of scientific knowledge of India, educated people in antiquity knew a great deal about the land and its people. A. India and the Old Testament India is mentioned in Esther 1:1 and 8:9 as the eastern boundary of the Persian Empire under Ahasuerus (c. fifth century B.C.) and in 1 Maccabees 6:37 in a reference to the Indian mahouts of Antiochus's war elephants (second century B.C.). Otherwise there are no explicit references to India in the Old Testament. However, archeological evidences of the Kulli culture of Baluchistan indicate that from c. 2800 B.C. there were contacts between Mesopotamia and the great cities of the Indus civilization.2 At the sites of ancient Sumerian cities of Kish, Lagash, and Ur, archeologists have discovered typical objects of the Indus civilization that indicate there existed a flourishing trade in spices between India and Mesopotamia.
    [Show full text]