The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders Edited by Michael Kyrios, Richard Moulding, Guy Doron, Sunil S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders Edited by Michael Kyrios, Richard Moulding, Guy Doron, Sunil S Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-07914-4 - The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders Edited by Michael Kyrios, Richard Moulding, Guy Doron, Sunil S. Bhar,Maja Nedeljkovic and Mario Mikulincer Frontmatter More information The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-07914-4 - The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders Edited by Michael Kyrios, Richard Moulding, Guy Doron, Sunil S. Bhar,Maja Nedeljkovic and Mario Mikulincer Frontmatter More information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-07914-4 - The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders Edited by Michael Kyrios, Richard Moulding, Guy Doron, Sunil S. Bhar,Maja Nedeljkovic and Mario Mikulincer Frontmatter More information The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders Edited by Michael Kyrios Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia Richard Moulding School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Guy Doron The Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya, Herzliya, Israel Sunil S. Bhar Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Maja Nedeljkovic Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia Mario Mikulincer Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya and Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Herzliya, Israel © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-07914-4 - The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders Edited by Michael Kyrios, Richard Moulding, Guy Doron, Sunil S. Bhar,Maja Nedeljkovic and Mario Mikulincer Frontmatter More information University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning and research at the highest international levels of excellence. www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107079144 © Cambridge University Press 2016 Th is publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2016 Printed in the United Kingdom by TJ International Ltd. Padstow Cornwall A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data Th e self in understanding and treating psychological disorders / edited by Michael Kyrios [and fi ve others]. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-107-07914-4 (hardback) I. Kyrios, Michael, editor. [DNLM: 1. Mental Disorders–therapy. 2. Self Concept. 3. Evidence-Based Medicine. WM 400] RC480.5 616.89′1–dc23 2015028162 ISBN 978-1-107-07914-4 Hardback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Every eff ort has been made in preparing this book to provide accurate and up-to-date information which is in accord with accepted standards and practice at the time of publication. Although case histories are drawn from actual cases, every eff ort has been made to disguise the identities of the individuals involved. Nevertheless, the authors, editors and publishers can make no warranties that the information contained herein is totally free from error, not least because clinical standards are constantly changing through research and regulation. Th e authors, editors and publishers therefore disclaim all liability for direct or consequential damages resulting from the use of material contained in this book. Readers are strongly advised to pay careful attention to information provided by the manufacturer of any drugs or equipment that they plan to use. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-07914-4 - The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders Edited by Michael Kyrios, Richard Moulding, Guy Doron, Sunil S. Bhar,Maja Nedeljkovic and Mario Mikulincer Frontmatter More information Contents List of contributors vii Foreword by Aaron T. Beck x A c k n o w l e d g m e n t s xi Section 1 Introduction and concepts 9 The self in bipolar disorder 82 Nuwan D. Leitan 1 The self in psychological disorders: an introduction 1 10 The self in social anxiety 91 Michael Kyrios Bree Gregory, Lorna Peters, and Ronald M. Rapee 2 The self-concept: theory and research 8 11 The self in posttraumatic stress disorder 102 Sunil S. Bhar and Michael Kyrios Mardi J. Horowitz and Monica A. Sicilia 3 Adult attachment and self-related 12 Self processes in obsessive–compulsive processes 19 disorder 112 Mario Mikulincer and Guy Doron Claire Ahern and Michael Kyrios 13 The self in the obsessive–compulsive-related disorders: hoarding disorder, body dysmorphic Section 2 The self in treatment disorder, and trichotillomania 123 frameworks Richard Moulding, Serafi no G. Mancuso, Imogen Rehm, and Maja Nedeljkovic 4 Working with the future: a psychodynamic– integrative approach to treatment 29 14 Self-regulation in disordered gambling: a Golan Shahar and Moran Schiller comparison with alcohol and substance use disorders 134 5 Finding the self in a cognitive behavioral Simone N. Rodda, Kate Hall, Petra K. Staiger, and perspective 40 Nicki A. Dowling David A. Clark 15 The self in autism 144 6 The self in acceptance and commitment Istvan Molnar-Szakacs and Lucina Q. Uddin therapy 50 Robert D. Zettle 16 Basic self disturbance in the schizophrenia spectrum: a review and future directions 158 7 The self in schema therapy 59 Barnaby Nelson, Louis A. Sass, and Josef Parnas Eshkol Rafaeli, Off er Maurer, Gal Lazarus, and Nathan C. Th oma 17 Painful incoherence: the self in borderline personality disorder 169 Giovanni Liotti and Benedetto Farina Section 3 The self in specifi c 18 The self in obsessive–compulsive personality psychological disorders disorder 179 Maja Nedeljkovic, Richard Moulding, Michael 8 The self in depression 71 Kyrios, and Stephanie Mathews Patrick Luyten and Peter Fonagy v © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-07914-4 - The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders Edited by Michael Kyrios, Richard Moulding, Guy Doron, Sunil S. Bhar,Maja Nedeljkovic and Mario Mikulincer Frontmatter More information Contents 19 The self in chronic fatigue syndrome 190 Section 4 Conclusions and future Stefan Kempke, Eline Coppens, Patrick Luyten, and Boudewijn Van Houdenhove directions 20 The self in eating disorders 201 23 Future directions in examining the self in Christopher Basten and Stephen Touyz psychological disorders 233 Michael Kyrios, Richard Moulding, Sunil S. Bhar, 21 The self in dementia 213 Guy Doron, Maja Nedeljkovic, and Mario Lisa S. Caddell Mikulincer 22 The self in gender dysphoria: a developmental perspective 222 Kenneth J. Zucker and Doug P. VanderLaan I n d e x 237 vi © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-07914-4 - The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders Edited by Michael Kyrios, Richard Moulding, Guy Doron, Sunil S. Bhar,Maja Nedeljkovic and Mario Mikulincer Frontmatter More information Contributors Claire Ahern Peter Fonagy Clinical Psychologist & Postdoctoral Researcher, Professor, Research Department of Clinical, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Educational and Health Psychology, University VIC, Australia College London, London, UK Christopher Basten Bree Gregory Senior Clinical Psychologist, Basten and PhD candidate, Centre for Emotional Health, Associates, Clinical Psychologists, Westmead, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia NSW, Australia Kate Hall Sunil S. Bhar Senior Lecturer of Psychology at the School of Associate Professor and Deputy Chair at the Psychology, Deakin University, VIC, Australia, and Department of Psychological Sciences, Senior Clinical Psychologist, Youth Support and Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Advocacy Service, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia VIC, Australia Mardi J. Horowitz Lisa S. Caddell Distinguished Professor of Psychiatry at the Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA Sheffi eld, Sheffi eld, UK Stefan Kempke Eline Coppens Postdoctoral Researcher of the Research Foundation PhD student, Special Fund FWO, Faculty of Flanders (FWO) at the Faculty of Psychology and Psychology and Educational Sciences, University Educational Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, of Leuven, and Clinical Psychologist at University Belgium Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Michael Kyrios David A. Clark Professor and Director, Research School of Professor Emeritus, University of New Brunswick, Psychology, Th e Australian National University, NB, Canada Canberra, ACT, Australia Nicki A. Dowling Gal Lazarus Associate Professor of Psychology at the School of Doctoral Student, Department of Psychology, Psychology, Deakin University, VIC, Australia Bar-Ilan University,
Recommended publications
  • Mixed Anaclitic–Introjective Psychopathology in Treatment-Resistant Inpatients Undergoing Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy
    PROD #: 030 Psychoanalytic Psychology Copyright 2003 by the Educational Publishing Foundation 2003, Vol. 20, No. 1, 84–102 0736-9735/03/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0736-9735.20.1.84 MIXED ANACLITIC–INTROJECTIVE PSYCHOPATHOLOGY IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT INPATIENTS UNDERGOING PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOTHERAPY Golan Shahar, PhD, and Richard Q. Ford, PhD Sidney J. Blatt, PhD Austen Riggs Center Yale University Utilizing data from the Riggs-Yale Project, 45 male and 45 female 18–29-year- old treatment-resistant inpatients undergoing intensive psychoanalytically ori- ented treatment were studied. Twenty-seven mixed-type anaclitic–introjective inpatients were compared with 29 “pure” anaclitic and 34 “pure” introjective inpatients. At intake, mixed-type inpatients were more clinically impaired (i.e., were more symptomatic, cognitively impaired, and thought disordered) and more vulnerable (i.e., less accurate object representations and more frequently used maladaptive defense mechanisms) in comparison with clearly defined ana- clitic and introjective patients. Mixed-type patients, however, improved signifi- cantly more in the course of psychoanalytically oriented treatment, in terms of clinical functioning (i.e., symptoms, cognitive functioning) and psychological vulnerability (i.e., utilization of more adaptive defense mechanisms). Interpersonal relatedness and self-definition are two fundamental themes in many psy- choanalytic and nonanalytic personality theories. In “Civilization and Its Discontents,” for example, Freud (1930/1961a) contrasted “the man who is predominantly erotic [and gives] first preference to his emotional relationships of other people” with “the narcissistic man, Golan Shahar, PhD, and Sidney J. Blatt, PhD, Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, Yale University; Richard Q. Ford, PhD, Austen Riggs Center, Stockbridge, Massachusetts. The authors thank Rachel B.
    [Show full text]
  • By Dana Tzur-Bitan
    Is the Looming Maladaptive Cognitive Style a Central Mechanism in the (Generalized) Anxiety – (Major) Depression Comorbidity: An Intra-Individual, Time Series Study Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of “DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY” by Dana Tzur-Bitan Submitted to the Senate of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev May 2011 Beer-Sheva Is the Looming Maladaptive Cognitive Style a Central Mechanism in the (Generalized) Anxiety – (Major) Depression Comorbidity: An Intra-Individual, Time Series Study Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of “DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY” by Dana Tzur-Bitan Submitted to the Senate of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Approved by the advisor Approved by the Dean of the Kreitman School of Advanced Graduate Studies May 2011 Beer-Sheva ii This work was carried out under the supervision of Prof. Nachshon Meiran and Prof. Golan Shahar In the Department of psychology Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. iii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisors, Professor Nachshon Meiran and Professor Golan Shahar, for their guidance and support throughout the past six years. To Proffesor Meiran, who has constantly challenged me to critical thinking and encouraged me to experiment, for carrying a positive and optimistic view, and for balancing my emotionality with a rationale and professional attitude. To professor Shahar, for mentoring my development as a psychologist and encouraging me to peruse my inner passions, for being genuinely interested in my success, and for taking an active part in my professional and personal growth. Thank you both for fruitful discussions, financial and moral support, and for sharing your knowledge and skills with me.
    [Show full text]
  • Healing Factors in Guided Affective Imagery: a Qualitative Meta-Analysis
    Healing Factors in Guided Affective Imagery: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a concentration in Psychology and a specialization in Counseling and Psychotherapy at the Union Institute & University Cincinnati, Ohio Elaine Sue Kramer April 3, 2010 Core Faculty: Lawrence J. Ryan, PhD i Abstract This qualitative meta-analysis compares and contrasts European and American approaches to Guided Affective Imagery (GAI). From a comparative review of literature of the European and American approaches, it is observed that there are noteworthy differences in how GAI is understood in theory and applied in practice. In the United States, GAI is not perceived as a method of deep psychotherapeutic intervention for neurotic disorders by most practitioners. In Europe, GAI is one of the more prevalent intervention techniques that has been reported to be effective in many disorders. Secondly, this meta-analysis seeks to identify the essential healing elements of GAI as they are implemented in psychotherapy. Twelve factors are identified from the literature. Of fundamental clinical importance is the activation of a patient’s “resources,” the positive characteristics of an individual that can be accessed to reinforce the patient’s ability to deal with a past traumatic experience. GAI provides the imagery context by which the patient may re-experience the trauma. The therapist assists by encouraging the patient to repeatedly utilize internal resources to confront the fearful event. Lasting relief may be conceptualized as repeated resource activation leading to a biochemically-induced remapping at synaptic sites away from the limbic-centered, emotion-based neural path associated with the traumatic event toward the prefrontal cortex-centered, cognitive-based path of appropriate behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Domains of Concepts, Theories, and Treatments
    Section I Domains of Concepts, Theories, and Treatments O Mostofsky—The Handbook of Behavioral Medicine O Mostofsky—The Handbook of Behavioral Medicine 1 Depression in Chronic Physical Illness: A Behavioral Medicine Approach Golan Shahar, Dana Lassri, and Patrick Luyten In this chapter, we address the prevalence, consequences, and presumed causes of unipolar depression in chronic, non-lethal, physical illness. We begin by outlining the central role of chronic physical illness (CPI) in medicine. Next, we consider the various manifestations of depression in CPI, focusing on the distinction between categorical approaches to depression (i.e., a diagnosable condition such as major depressive episode) and dimensional approaches (i.e., elevated levels of depressive symptoms in the absence of a diagnosable episode) to depression. From a behavioral medicine point of view, we argue, it makes more sense to address depression as a continuous dimension rather than to distinguish between diagnos- able and “subsyndromal” depression. Next, we present a tentative model account- ing for depression in CPI, which focuses on person–context exchanges. We conclude by discussing the implications of this view for assessment/screening, treatment, and prevention. Chronic Physical Illness: Definition, Prevalence, Costs The World Health Organization (WHO) defines chronic diseases as diseases of long duration and generally slow progression. According to the US National Center for Health Statistics, a disease lasting 3 months or more is considered chronic (http:// www.who.int/topics/chronic_diseases/en). Chronic diseases refer to a variety of medical and functional somatic conditions (i.e., cancer, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pelvic pain, chronic pain, chronic The Handbook of Behavioral Medicine, First Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • University of London Thesis
    REFERENCE ONLY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THESIS Degree f*Vvo Year Name of Author A £ C O P Y R IG H T This is a thesis accepted for a Higher Degree of the University of London. It is an unpublished typescript and the copyright is held by the author. All persons consulting the thesis must read and abide by the Copyright Declaration below. COPYRIGHT DECLARATION I recognise that the copyright of the above-described thesis rests with the author and that no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. LOANS Theses may not be lent to individuals, but the Senate House Library may lend a copy to approved libraries within the United Kingdom, for consultation solely on the premises of those libraries. Application should be made to: Inter-Library Loans, Senate House Library, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU. REPRODUCTION University of London theses may not be reproduced without explicit written permission from the Senate House Library. Enquiries should be addressed to the Theses Section of the Library. Regulations concerning reproduction vary according to the date of acceptance of the thesis and are listed below as guidelines. A. Before 1962. Permission granted only upon the prior written consent of the author. (The Senate House Library will provide addresses where possible). B. 1962-1974. In many cases the author has agreed to permit copying upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. C. 1975 - 1988. Most theses may be copied upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. D. 1989 onwards. Most theses may be copied.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded From: Conference Should Contact Lee Smith, Campaigns and Issues/We Need to Talk Association Chair (Lee.Smith@Ukonline
    NEWS , ANALYSIS , OPINION FOR THE PSYCHOANALYTIC COMMUNITY ISSUE 4 AUTUMN 2010 Should Psychoanalytic ‘In Treatment’: The HPC on psychoanalysis Psychotherapy writing fitness to be in the NOW 2010 from life practise 2 Science Museum? 4 7 8 NHS, impacting on every corner of relationships with local commissioners. mental health care. The highly respected Individual practitioners will increasingly Kings Fund, which generally supports need to group themselves into larger Gearing the need for reform, has warned that the practices to compete effectively in the scale and speed of the current reforms is market place; the BPC will be looking at likely to distract attention from the need ways we can help build expertise across to maintain quality and avoid cutting the sector in various forms of social up to meet services. enterprise. How can our profession respond to these Finally, the scale of these challenges huge changes? How do we help make highlights more dramatically than ever challenges it possible for psychological therapy the incapacitating fragmentation of the services to be organised along the lines psychoanalytic and psychodynamic recommended by the We Need to Talk community. Many of our organisations coalition? And how can we help ensure have begun to sense just how weak they ahead that large numbers of high-calibre are by operating in this isolated manner. psychoanalytic and psychodynamic The need to move from this broad By Malcolm Allen anyone concerned about the shape of such practitioners are not lost to the system in perception to a position of purposeful services in the future. The report reveals the years ahead? strategic action is of course another that only eight percent of those surveyed matter.
    [Show full text]
  • An Editorial Statement
    An Editorial Statement Golan Shahar Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Jack C. Anchin University at Buffalo SUNY William H. Gottidiener John Jay College of Criminal Justice Kenneth N. Levy Pennsylvania State University Nilly Mor Hebrew University in Jerusalem It is with excitement and earnestness that we assume the role of Editor and Associate Editors for the Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. JPI has been the official publication of the Society for the Exploration of Psycho- therapy Integration (SEPI) for the past 21 years. Owing to the vision and leadership of SEPI founders (see Goldfried & Newman, 2003), and previous JPI editors (Arkowitz, Gold; see Gold, 2010), JPI has been enjoying a steady growth in both readership and prestige throughout these years. The notion and option of psychotherapy integration, not only as an outlet from the big psychotherapy wars, but also as an approach to treatment, is now well established, and is here to stay. It is incumbent upon us, Editor Shahar and Associate Editors Anchin, Gottidiener, Levy, and Mor, to launch the journal Golan Shahar, Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel; Jack C. Anchin, Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo SUNY; William H. Gottidiener, Department of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice; Kenneth N. Levy, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University; Nilly Mor, School of Education, Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. Golan Shahar is Editor, and Jack C. Anchin, William H. Gottidiener, Kenneth N. Levy, and Nilly Mor are Associate Editors, for the Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. The Associate Editors’ names were alphabetically ordered.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewing the Group Through the Lens of Attachment Theory
    Secure Attachment Creates Bold Explorers: viewing the group through the lens of Attachment theory Jean Mehrtens RPN, BA, DipEd, MAppSci A Thesis presented to the Board of Examiners of the Australian and New Zealand Psychodrama Association Inc. in partial fulfilment of the requirement for certification as a Psychodramatist Copyright Statement This thesis has been completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements toward certification as a practitioner by the Board of Examiners of the Australian and New Zealand Psychodrama Association Incorporated. It represents a considerable body of work undertaken with extensive supervision. This knowledge and insight has been gained through hundreds of hours of experience, study and reflection. © Australian and New Zealand Psychodrama Association Incorporated 2008 Copyright is held by the author. The Australian and New Zealand Psychodrama Association Incorporated has the license to publish. All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission from the author and/or the Australian and New Zealand Psychodrama Association Incorporated. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical photocopying, recording or otherwise, save with written permission of the Australian and New Zealand Psychodrama Association Incorporated and/or the author. The development, preparation and publication of this work have been undertaken with great care. However, the publisher is not responsible for any errors contained herein or for consequences that may ensue from use of materials or information contained in this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder: Where Do We Go from Here?
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UCL Discovery Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Where do we go from here? Peter Fonagy, Patrick Luyten, Anthony Bateman Submitted to: JAMA Psychiatry Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is one of the most prevalent, and most disabling, personality disorders. There is increasing consensus that the disorder is characterized by three related core features: severe emotion dysregulation, strong impulsivity, and social- interpersonal dysfunction.1 Individuals diagnosed with BPD were historically considered to be “hard to reach” and pessimism with regard to treatment prevailed. This view has changed over the past two decades, mainly as a result of emerging evidence for the efficacy and cost- effectiveness of specialized psychotherapies for individuals with BPD.2,3 The study by Cristea and colleagues4 in this issue represents a new and major leap forward in this regard, as it heralds the coming of age of research on the effectiveness of psychotherapy for BPD. Cristea et al. report a meta-analysis including 33 studies of specialized psychotherapy either as a standalone treatment or as an add-on to non-specialized psychotherapies in adult patients diagnosed with BPD. Overall, specialized psychotherapy emerges as moderately more effective than non-specialized psychotherapy in reducing borderline-relevant and other outcomes, such as general psychopathology and service utilization, with no differences between specialized psychotherapy as a standalone or as an add-on to usual treatment. Importantly, these effects were typically maintained up to 2-year follow-up. Very few adverse events were reported, suggesting that psychotherapy for BPD is both effective and safe.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Mentalization? the Concept and Its Foundations in Developmental
    What is Mentalization? The Concept and its Foundations in Developmental Research and Social-Cognitive Neuroscience Peter Fonagy Elizabeth Allison Address for correspondence: Peter Fonagy PhD FBA Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 44 20 7679 1791 Fax: 44 20 7916 8502 Chapter submitted for Nick Midgley & Ioanna Vrouva (eds) Keeping Children in Mind: Mentalization-based Interventions with Children, Young People and their Families, January 2011. What is mentalization? When we mentalize we are engaged in a form of (mostly preconscious) imaginative mental activity that enables us to perceive and interpret human behavior in terms of intentional mental states (e.g., needs, desires, feelings, beliefs, goals, purposes, and reasons) (Allen, Fonagy, & Bateman, 2008). Mentalizing must be imaginative because we have to imagine what other people might be thinking or feeling. We can never know for sure what is in someone else’s mind (Fonagy, Steele, Steele, & Target, 1997). Moreover, perhaps counterintuitively, we suggest that a similar kind of imaginative leap is required to understand our own mental experience, particularly in relation to emotionally charged issues. We shall see that the ability to mentalize is vital for self-organization and affect regulation. The ability to infer and represent other people’s mental states may be uniquely human. It seems to have evolved to enable humans to predict and interpret others’ actions quickly and efficiently in a large variety of competitive and cooperative situations. However, the extent to which each of us is able to master this vital capacity is crucially influenced by our early experiences as well as our genetic inheritance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Essence of Psychotherapy: a Review and Reflections
    The Essence of Psychotherapy: A Review and Reflections Keith Tudor Auckland University of Technology Abstract In response to the theme of this special issue of the journal, and utilising a specific literature review, this article offers some comments and reflections on the essence of psychotherapy, and also considers the problem of essentialism. Waitara He kauparetanga ki te matū o tēnei whakaputanga motuhake o te hautaka, me te whakamahi i te arotakenga tuhinga mātuauta, ka horaina atu i tēnei tuhinga ētahi whakaaro, hokinga whakaaro mai i te iho o te whakaora hinengaro me te kōhuki i te āhua o te whakawai. Essence and Essentialism From the time in April 2013 that members of the New Zealand Association of Psychotherapists (NZAP) were introduced to the theme of the 2014 Conference, “The Essence” (of psychotherapy), I began to reflect on what I — and others — think is the essence of what we do. During the rest of that year, various announcements were made about the Conference (on the NZAP website and in the Newsletter), introducing another theme: [the] life and death of the psychotherapist, as well as a stimulating question: “What is enlivening and what is deadening in our work”, and, finally, a strapline, “Holding the Space” which, I assumed, referred to the principle method of the Conference of holding and facilitating group space. When we refer to the essence of something, we are generally trying to define or distil the nature of the thing, or to get to the heart of the matter. Thus, in response to the question, “What is the essence of psychotherapy”, we may, for instance, define psychotherapy as “soul healing” (from the Greek psyche meaning soul and terapeia meaning healing).
    [Show full text]
  • Psychoanalysis—With Whom, for What, and How? Comparisons with Psychotherapy
    ja p a Sidney J. Blatt / Golan Shahar 52/2 PSYCHOANALYSIS—WITH WHOM, FOR WHAT, AND HOW? COMPARISONS WITH PSYCHOTHERAPY If psychoanalytic treatment is to survive in the era of evidence-based medicine and managed care systems, empirical evidence is needed to demonstrate its unique nature and effectiveness. To address this need, comprehensive analyses were conducted of data from the Menninger Psychotherapy Research Project (Wallerstein 1986). These analyses addressed three questions: (1) What are the differences in outcome between psychoanalysis (PSA) and supportive-expressive psycho- therapy (SEP)? (2) With what types of patient, and in what ways, are these two psychodynamic treatments differentially effective? (3) Are these differences in outcome the consequence of possibly different mechanisms of therapeutic action? PSA was found to contribute sig- nificantly to the development of adaptive interpersonal capacities and to the reduction of maladaptive interpersonal tendencies, especially with more ruminative, self-reflective, introjective patients, possibly by ex- tending their associative capacities. SEP, by contrast, was effective only in reducing maladaptive interpersonal tendencies and only with depen- dent, unreflective, more affectively labile anaclitic patients, possibly by containing or limiting their associative capacities. he advent of managed care and the changed climate for long-term T intensive psychological therapies, including a declining interest in psychoanalysis, have raised once again the importance of articulating Sidney J. Blatt, Professor of Psychiatry and Psychology, Yale University; fac- ulty, Western New England Institute for Psychoanalysis. Golan Shahar, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Psychology, Yale University. The research presented in this paper was supported in part by grants from the John D.
    [Show full text]