(19) United States Pillarbox

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(19) United States Pillarbox US 20120013798A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/0013798 A1 Arora et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jan. 19, 2012 (54) METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ACHIEVING (52) US. Cl. ............................... .. 348/445; 348/E07.003 BETTER PICTURE QUALITY IN VARIOUS ZOOM MODES (57) ABSTRACT (76) Inventors: Gaurav Arora, Northborough, MA (US); Adil Jagmag, Hollis, NH A method and system are provided in Which a video image may be scaled from a ?rst to a second video format. The (Us) scaling may be a non-uniform scaling such as an anamorphic (21) Appl. No.: 13/013,307 scaling. When panning associated With the scaled video image is detected, one or more end portions of a current frame (22) Filed: Jan. 25, 2011 of the scaled video image may be adjusted, the adjustment being based on one or more frames of the scaled video image Related US. Application Data that are previous to the current frame. The adjustment may result from combining information from the corresponding (60) Provisional application No. 61/364,628, ?led on Jul. end portion of previous frames With the information of the 15, 2010. current frame. One or more end portions that are opposite to the ones adjusted may also be adjusted based on one or more Publication Classi?cation frames of the scaled video image that are subsequent to the (51) Int. Cl. current frame. The panning detected may be horizontal, ver H04N 7/01 (2006.01) tical, or a combination thereof. pillarbox 4:3 530a / 520 53Gb pillarbox Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 1 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 Server IN / , ‘ I f 132 1 i ------------------------ ‘__"--_ Cable/Satellite . 122 110 111 V / f 134 V142 120 m K / 136 C) |:| Fig. 1 Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 2 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 Digital Television System-On-Chip E Audio ‘ reproduction Audio 7 module module E Cab|e/ Tuning Interface M Core Tv/ —> module : module procgslsor Video Satellite m E Video mgog e > display module — ' module M m Other devices 8:228 —> and/or peripherals Host processor Memory module module 240 E Fig. 2 Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 3 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 320 Fig. 3A 340 Fig. 3B Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 4 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 A] Ietterbox 420 16:9 Ietterbox K 430a Fig. 4 Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 5 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 pillarbox 4:3 530a / 520 530b pillarbox Fig. 5 Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 6 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 Top end _A_ 1 v. \.\ \__ 4.3. 600 wk- ‘ "-_ \\ Height "'~~.,, 610 -\.___\ 4/ _~-.\ \ 16:9 _ \ \ \ Bottom end " ‘ ‘ Width ‘ ‘ 16:9 left} \ 4:3 left 4:3 right} \16;9 right end end end end Fig. 6 Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 7 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 Frame (k-2) 760 Frame (k-1) 700 \ i 720 2% Current frame (k) :> Frame (k+1) PANNING 770 DIRECTION Frame (k+2) Fig. 7A Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 8 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 Frame (k+2) 770 Frame (k+1) 70)? Current frame (k) Frame (k-1) PANNING 760 DIRECTION Frame (k-2) Fig. 7B Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 9 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 870 Frame (k+2) ‘J 800 810 l 820 Frame (k+1) N ) 27’ \ Frame (k-1) Current frame (k) 830 860 840 PANNING F rame( k-2 ) DIRECTION Fig. 8A Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 10 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 860 Frame (k-2) ‘J 800 820 810 Frame (k-1) Frame (k+1) Current frame (k) 830 870 840 PANNING F rame( k+2 ) DIRECTION Fig. 8B Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 11 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 Frame (k-2) 760 Frame (k-1) 900 Current frame (k) Frame (k+1) PANNING 770 DIRECTION k» Frame (k+2) Fig. 9 Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 12 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 10000 Scaling a video image from a first video format to a second video format Detecting panning in the scaled video image Adjusting, upon detection of the panning, one or more end portions of a current frame based on one or more previous frames Adjusting one or more opposite end portions of the current frame based on one or more subsequent frames Fig. 10 Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 13 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 1110 Frame (k, (DN) / Frame (k, (D1) Frame (k, CD1) / 11008 I Current frame (k, (DO) u 1150b Fig. 11 Augmented current frame (k) Patent Application Publication Jan. 19, 2012 Sheet 14 0f 14 US 2012/0013798 A1 1200 Digitally zooming a video image Selecting one or more frames that correspond to a current frame of the zoomed video image, wherein the one or more frames have a different viewing angle Combining information from the current frame and the selected frames to generate an augmented current frame of the zoomed video image Fig. 12 US 2012/0013798 A1 Jan. 19, 2012 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ACHIEVING [0012] FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary con BETTER PICTURE QUALITY IN VARIOUS version of a 16: 9 aspect ratio video image to a 4:3 aspect ratio ZOOM MODES video image, in connection With an embodiment of the inven tion. CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED [0013] FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an exemplary con APPLICATIONS/INCORPORATION BY version of a 4:3 aspect ratio video image to a 16: 9 aspect ratio REFERENCE video image, in connection With an embodiment of the inven tion. [0001] This application claims priority to and makes refer [0014] FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a non-uniform hori ence to US. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/364, Zontal scaling of a 4:3 aspect ratio video image to a 16:9 628 ?led on Jul. 15, 2010. aspect ratio video image, in accordance With an embodiment [0002] The above stated application is hereby incorporated of the invention. herein by reference in its entirety. [0015] FIGS. 7A and 7B are each a diagram illustrating reduction of a jarring effect on horiZontal panning content by FIELD OF THE INVENTION utiliZing previous and/or subsequent frames, in accordance With embodiments of the invention. [0003] Certain embodiments of the invention relate to pro [0016] FIGS. 8A and 8B are each a diagram illustrating cessing of video signals. More speci?cally, certain embodi reduction of a jarring effect on vertical panning content by ments of the invention relate to a method and system for utiliZing previous and/or subsequent frames, in accordance achieving better picture quality in various Zoom modes. With embodiments of the invention. [0017] FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating reduction of a jarring BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION effect on a right-doWn panning content by utiliZing previous and/or subsequent frames, in accordance With an embodi [0004] Televisions typically support a range of vieW ment of the invention. modes, including letterboxing and/or pillarboxing, Zooms [0018] FIG. 10 is a How diagram illustrating exemplary that employ clipping of a source, and Zooms that employ steps for reducing a jarring effect on panning content, in scaling of the image provided by the video source Without accordance With an embodiment of the invention. preserving the original aspect ratio. In some instances, a [0019] FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating augmentation of a television can support a combination of the above-described digitally Zoomed video image based on frames having a dif modes. Such vieW modes can have an effect on image quality, ferent vieWing angle, in accordance With an embodiment of particularly on the smoothness and/or sharpness of the scaled the invention. or Zoomed video image. [0020] FIG. 12 is a How diagram illustrating exemplary [0005] Further limitations and disadvantages of conven steps for augmenting a Zoomed video image, in accordance tional and traditional approaches Will become apparent to one With an embodiment of the invention. of skill in the art, through comparison of such systems With the present invention as set forth in the remainder of the DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION present application With reference to the draWings. [0021] Certain embodiments of the invention can be found in a method and system for achieving better picture quality in BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION various Zoom modes. Various embodiments of the invention provide for a video processor that may scale a video image [0006] A system and/ or method for achieving better picture from a ?rst video format to a second video format, detecting quality in various Zoom modes, as set forth more completely panning associated With the scaled video image, and adjust in the claims. ing, When the panning is detected, one or more endportions of [0007] Various advantages, aspects and novel features of a current frame of the scaled video image. The ?rst video the present invention, as Well as details of an illustrated format may be a 4:3 aspect ratio video format and the second embodiment thereof, Will be more fully understood from the video format may be a 16:9 aspect ratio video format, for folloWing description and draWings. example. Other video formats, hoWever, may also be utiliZed. The scaling of the video image may comprise non-uniform BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF scaling, such as an anamorphic scaling, for example. The THE DRAWINGS scaling need not be limited to full screen scaling, for example, but may also be utiliZed in instances Where the scaling [0008] FIG.
Recommended publications
  • Designing a Cinema Auditorium
    ROLV GJESTLAND HOW TO DESIGN A CINEMA AUDITORIUM Practical guidelines for architects, cinema owners and others involved in planning and building cinemas HOW TO USE THIS BOOK This book can be read from beginning to end, to learn more about the elements that need to be taken into consideration when designing a cinema auditorium. But it may also be used as a reference in the design process, as the different parts of the auditorium are planned. Just be aware that making a change in one element might affect others. Designing a cinema auditorium is quite easy if you follow the rules. Although, if everyone follows all the rules, all auditoriums would look the same. Go beyond the rules, but always keep in mind that the main purpose of a cinema auditorium is to give the audience the best film experience. In addition, there are many other rooms in a cinema complex where you can use your creativity to create great experiences for patrons and make them want to come back. FEEDBACK This is the first edition of the book, and I am sure someone will miss something, someone will disagree with something and something will be incomplete or difficult to understand. Please do not hesitate to share your opinions, so the next edition can be better and the next one after that… Please use the contact info below. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Rolv Gjestland has a master's degree in metallurgy from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. He is now advisor in cinema concepts, design, logistics and technology for Film&Kino, the nonprofit trade organisation for Norwegian cinemas.
    [Show full text]
  • Thursday 15 October 11:00 an Introduction to Cinerama and Widescreen Cinema 18:00 Opening Night Delegate Reception (Kodak Gallery) 19:00 Oklahoma!
    Thursday 15 October 11:00 An Introduction to Cinerama and Widescreen Cinema 18:00 Opening Night Delegate Reception (Kodak Gallery) 19:00 Oklahoma! Please allow 10 minutes for introductions Friday 16 October before all films during Widescreen Weekend. 09.45 Interstellar: Visual Effects for 70mm Filmmaking + Interstellar Intermissions are approximately 15 minutes. 14.45 BKSTS Widescreen Student Film of The Year IMAX SCREENINGS: See Picturehouse 17.00 Holiday In Spain (aka Scent of Mystery) listings for films and screening times in 19.45 Fiddler On The Roof the Museum’s newly refurbished digital IMAX cinema. Saturday 17 October 09.50 A Bridge Too Far 14:30 Screen Talk: Leslie Caron + Gigi 19:30 How The West Was Won Sunday 18 October 09.30 The Best of Cinerama 12.30 Widescreen Aesthetics And New Wave Cinema 14:50 Cineramacana and Todd-AO National Media Museum Pictureville, Bradford, West Yorkshire. BD1 1NQ 18.00 Keynote Speech: Douglas Trumbull – The State of Cinema www.nationalmediamuseum.org.uk/widescreen-weekend 20.00 2001: A Space Odyssey Picturehouse Box Office 0871 902 5756 (calls charged at 13p per minute + your provider’s access charge) 20.00 The Making of The Magnificent Seven with Brian Hannan plus book signing and The Magnificent Seven (Cubby Broccoli) Facebook: widescreenweekend Twitter: @widescreenwknd All screenings and events in Pictureville Cinema unless otherwise stated Widescreen Weekend Since its inception, cinema has been exploring, challenging and Tickets expanding technological boundaries in its continuous quest to provide Tickets for individual screenings and events the most immersive, engaging and entertaining spectacle possible. can be purchased from the Picturehouse box office at the National Media Museum or by We are privileged to have an unrivalled collection of ground-breaking phoning 0871 902 5756.
    [Show full text]
  • CINERAMA: the First Really Big Show
    CCINEN RRAMAM : The First Really Big Show DIVING HEAD FIRST INTO THE 1950s:: AN OVERVIEW by Nick Zegarac Above left: eager audience line ups like this one for the “Seven Wonders of the World” debut at the Cinerama Theater in New York were short lived by the end of the 1950s. All in all, only seven feature films were actually produced in 3-strip Cinerama, though scores more were advertised as being shot in the process. Above right: corrected three frame reproduction of the Cypress Water Skiers in ‘This is Cinerama’. Left: Fred Waller, Cinerama’s chief architect. Below: Lowell Thomas; “ladies and gentlemen, this is Cinerama!” Arguably, Cinerama was the most engaging widescreen presentation format put forth during the 1950s. From a visual standpoint it was the most enveloping. The cumbersome three camera set up and three projector system had been conceptualized, designed and patented by Fred Waller and his associates at Paramount as early as the 1930s. However, Hollywood was not quite ready, and certainly not eager, to “revolutionize” motion picture projection during the financially strapped depression and war years…and who could blame them? The standardized 1:33:1(almost square) aspect ratio had sufficed since the invention of 35mm celluloid film stock. Even more to the point, the studios saw little reason to invest heavily in yet another technology. The induction of sound recording in 1929 and mounting costs for producing films in the newly patented 3-strip Technicolor process had both proved expensive and crippling adjuncts to the fluidity that silent B&W nitrate filming had perfected.
    [Show full text]
  • Dtavhal Programmers Interface Table of Contents
    DTAvHAL Programmers Interface Revision 0.1 Copyright (c) 2004-2012 Drastic Technologies Ltd. All Rights Reserved www.drastic.tv Table of Contents DTAvHAL Programmers Interface......................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................3 Direct Link Usage...........................................................................................................3 Windows 32 OS – using 32 bit..............................................................................3 Windows 64 – using 32 bit....................................................................................3 Windows 64 – using 64 bit....................................................................................3 Mac OS-X..............................................................................................................3 Linux 64.................................................................................................................3 Functions.........................................................................................................................5 avOpen...................................................................................................................5 avClose..................................................................................................................5 avChannels.............................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • History of Widescreen Aspect Ratios
    HISTORY OF WIDESCREEN ASPECT RATIOS ACADEMY FRAME In 1889 Thomas Edison developed an early type of projector called a Kinetograph, which used 35mm film with four perforations on each side. The frame area was an inch wide and three quarters of an inch high, producing a ratio of 1.37:1. 1932 the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences made the Academy Ratio the standard Ratio, and was used in cinemas until 1953 when Paramount Pictures released Shane, produced with a Ratio of 1.66:1 on 35mm film. TELEVISION FRAME The standard analogue television screen ratio today is 1.33:1. The Aspect Ratio is the relationship between the width and height. A Ratio of 1.33:1 or 4:3 means that for every 4 units wide it is 3 units high (4 / 3 = 1.33). In the 1950s, Hollywood's attempt to lure people away from their television sets and back into cinemas led to a battle of screen sizes. Fred CINERAMA Waller of Paramount's Special Effects Department developed a large screen system called Cinerama, which utilised three cameras to record a single image. Three electronically synchronised projectors were used to project an image on a huge screen curved at an angle of 165 degrees, producing an aspect ratio of 2.8:1. This Is Cinerama was the first Cinerama film released in 1952 and was a thrilling travelogue which featured a roller-coaster ride. See Film Formats. In 1956 Metro Goldwyn Mayer was planning a CAMERA 65 ULTRA PANAVISION massive remake of their 1926 silent classic Ben Hur.
    [Show full text]
  • 13A Computer Video (1022-1143)
    Section13a COMPUTER VIDEO 12 Inch Design ............................1024-1027 Adobe ...........................................1028-1043 AJA ................................................1044-1063 Apple.............................................1064-1079 Avid ...............................................1080-1083 Automatic Duck..........................1084-1085 BlackMagic Design ....................1086-1099 Boris FX .........................................1100-1109 Video Cineform ........................................1110-1111 DigiEffects .....................................1112-1113 Contour Design......................................1114 Grass Valley ...................................1115-1119 Intel..........................................................1120 JL Cooper ......................................1122-1123 Matrox ...........................................1124-1127 MOTU .............................................1128-1129 SourceBook Newtek ..........................................1130-1133 Red Giant ......................................1134-1139 Sony ...............................................1140-1143 Sorenson.................................................1144 Tiffen........................................................1145 Obtaining information and ordering from B&H is quick and The easy. When you call us, just punch in the corresponding Quick Dial number anytime during our welcome message. The Quick Dial code then directs you to the specific professional sales associates in our order department.
    [Show full text]
  • ASPECT RATIO Aspect Ratios Are One of the More Confusing Parts of Video
    ASPECT RATIO Aspect ratios are one of the more confusing parts of video, although they used to be simple. That's because television and movie content was all about the same size, 4:3 (also known as 1.33:1, meaning that the picture is 1.33 times as long as it is high). The Academy Standard before 1952 was 1.37:1, so there was virtually no problem showing movies on TV. However, as TV began to cut into Hollywood's take at the theater, the quest was on to differentiate theater offerings in ways that could not be seen on TV. Thus, innovations such as widescreen film, Technicolor, and even 3-D were born. Widescreen film was one of the innovations that survived and has since dominated the cinema. Today, you tend to find films in one of two widescreen aspect ratios: 1. Academy Standard (or "Flat"), which has an aspect ratio of 1.85:1 2. Anamorphic Scope (or "Scope"), which has an aspect ratio of 2.35:1. Scope is also called Panavision or CinemaScope. HDTV is specified at a 16:9, or 1.78:1, aspect ratio.If your television isn't widescreen and you want to watch a widescreen film, you have a problem. The most common approach in the past has been what's called Pan and Scan. For each frame o a film, a decision is made as to what constitutes the action area. That part of the film frame is retained, and the rest is lost.. This can often leave out the best parts of a picture.
    [Show full text]
  • MARK FREEMAN Encyclopedia of Science, Technology and Society Ooks&Sidtext=0816031231&Leftid=0
    MARK FREEMAN Encyclopedia of Science, Technology and Society http://www.factsonfile.com/newfacts/FactsDetail.asp?PageValue=B ooks&SIDText=0816031231&LeftID=0 WIDESCREEN The scale of motion picture projection depends upon the inter- relationship of several factors: the size and aspect ratio of the screen; the gauge of the film; the type of lenses used for filming and projection; and the number of synchronized projectors used. These choices are in turn determined by engineering, marketing and aesthetic considerations. Aspect ratio is the width of the screen divided by the height. The classic standard aspect ratio was expressed as 1.33:1. Today most movies are screened as 1.85:1 or 2.35:1 (widescreen). Films shot in these ratios are cropped for television, which retains the classic ratio of 1.33:1. This cropping is accomplished either by removing a third of the image at the sides of the frame, or by "panning and scanning." In this process a technician determines which portion of a given frame should be included. "Letterboxing" creates a band of black above and below the televised film image. This allows the composition as originally photographed to be screened in video. The larger the film negative, the more resolution. Large film gauges allow greater resolution over a given size of projected image. In the 1890's film sizes varied from 12mm to as many as 80mm, before accepting Edison's 35mm standard. Today films continue to be screened in a variety of guages including Super 8mm, 16mm and Super 16mm, 35mm, 70mm and IMAX. Cinema and the fairground share a common history in the search for technologically based spectacles and attractions.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Essay for "This Is Cinerama"
    This Is Cinerama By Kyle Westphal “The pictures you are now going to see have no plot. They have no stars. This is not a stage play, nor is it a feature picture not a travelogue nor a symphonic concert or an opera—but it is a combination of all of them.” So intones Lowell Thomas before introduc- ing America to a ‘major event in the history of entertainment’ in the eponymous “This Is Cinerama.” Let’s be clear: this is a hyperbol- ic film, striving for the awe and majesty of a baseball game, a fireworks show, and the virgin birth all rolled into one, delivered with Cinerama gave audiences the feeling they were riding the roller coaster the insistent hectoring of a hypnotically ef- at Rockaway’s Playland. Courtesy Library of Congress Collection. fective multilevel marketing pitch. rama productions for a year or two. Retrofitting existing “This Is Cinerama” possesses more bluster than a politi- theaters with Cinerama equipment was an enormously cian on the stump, but the Cinerama system was a genu- expensive proposition—and the costs didn’t end with in- inely groundbreaking development in the history of motion stallation. With very high fixed labor costs (the Broadway picture exhibition. Developed by inventor Fred Waller from employed no less than seventeen union projectionists), an his earlier Vitarama, a multi-projector system used primari- unusually large portion of a Cinerama theater’s weekly ly for artillery training during World War II, Cinerama gross went back into the venue’s operating costs, leaving sought to scrap most of the uniform projection standards precious little for the producers.
    [Show full text]
  • Eidr 2.6 Data Fields Reference
    EIDR 2.6 DATA FIELDS REFERENCE Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Introduction to Content ................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Composite Details ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 How to read the Tables ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 EIDR IDs ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 2 BASE OBJECT TYPE ......................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Referent Type Details ................................................................................................................................. 25 2.3 Title Details ................................................................................................................................................ 26 2.4 Language Code Details ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Post: Workflows and Techniques for Digital Filmmakers
    Modern Post Workflows and Techniques for Digital Filmmakers This page intentionally left blank Modern Post Workflows and Techniques for Digital Filmmakers Scott Arundale and Tashi Trieu First published 2015 by Focal Press 70 Blanchard Road, Suite 402, Burlington, MA 01803 and by Focal Press 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Focal Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2015 Taylor & Francis The right of Scott Arundale and Tashi Trieu to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility. Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
    [Show full text]
  • Widescreen Weekend 2010 Brochure (PDF)
    52 widescreen weekend widescreen weekend 53 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY (70MM) REMASTERING A WIDESCREEN CLASSIC: Saturday 27 March, Pictureville Cinema WINDJAMMER GETS A MAJOR FACELIFT Dir. Stanley Kubrick GB/USA 1968 149 mins plus intermission (U) Saturday 27 March, Pictureville Cinema WIDESCREEN Keir Dullea, Gary Lockwood, William Sylvester, Leonard Rossiter, Ed Presented by David Strohmaier and Randy Gitsch Bishop and Douglas Rain as Hal The producer and director team behind Cinerama Adventure offer WEEKEND During the stone age, a mysterious black monolith of alien origination a fascinating behind-the-scenes look at how the Cinemiracle epic, influences the birth of intelligence amongst mankind. Thousands Now in its 17th year, the Widescreen Weekend Windjammer, was restored for High Definition. Several new and of years later scientists discover the monolith hidden on the moon continues to welcome all those fans of large format and innovative software restoration techniques were employed and the re- which subsequently lures them on a dangerous mission to Mars... widescreen films – CinemaScope, VistaVision, 70mm, mastering and preservation process has been documented in HD video. Regarded as one of the milestones in science-fiction filmmaking, Cinerama and IMAX – and presents an array of past A brief question and answer session will follow this event. Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey not only fascinated audiences classics from the vaults of the National Media Museum. This event is enerously sponsored by Cinerama, Inc., all around the world but also left many puzzled during its initial A weekend to wallow in the nostalgic best of cinema. release. More than four decades later it has lost none of its impact.
    [Show full text]