Written evidence from Stand with (FOE0121)

About Fight for Freedom. Stand with Hong Kong. Fight for Freedom. Stand with Hong Kong is a completely independent, grassroots, crowdfunded group of individuals who have come together to fight for freedom and democracy for Hong Kong. Our members come from all walks of life and are united by a shared vision. Following the promulgation of the National Security Law in June 2020 by the Chinese Communist Party, we are now the only grassroots organisation representing the voice of Hongkongers in the , the United States, and the .

Introduction Since coming into force in June 2020, the National Security Law (NSL) has been used to suppress freedom of expression, of the press and of assembly, both on the streets and online in Hong Kong. This has impacted academic freedom as well. We have seen the introduction of national security education, new censorship guidelines encouraging students and teachers to monitor each other for ‘thoughtcrime’, and the removal of pro-democracy academics. These trends ensure the National Security Law will have an adverse chilling effect on the education sector in Hong Kong and will profoundly harm our future generations.

The NSL has also impacted university students in the UK. One of the key features of the law is that it also asserts jurisdiction over non-Hong Kong residents, who can be prosecuted or arrested for their acts outside of Hong Kong.

Article 38 of the NSL is having a wider effect on UK universities as it allows for persons to be prosecuted for offences committed “from outside the Region by a person who is not a permanent resident of the Region”. This means that critics of – including Hong Kong’s large diaspora – may face legal risks if they enter or return to the city. As a result, university students and academics in the UK are at risk of prosecution for criticising China, should they enter Hong Kong. This submission explores in more detail how Hongkongers’ freedom of expression has been curtailed in UK universities as a result of this new law.

How has the situation changed in universities in the two years since the Committee’s report on the issue?

The NSL is a direct assault on academic freedom by the Chinese Communist Party, preventing vigorous debate and withholding from students the safe space for unfettered debate without fear. In September 2020, it was reported that students studying at Oxford University specialising in the study of China are being asked to submit some of their work anonymously, to protect them from the possibility of retribution under the NSL.1 Additionally, with classes now being

1 https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/sep/28/oxford-moves-to-protect-students-from-chinas-hong-kong- security-law

1 delivered online due to coronavirus, students are told not to record the content or share the material with anyone outside the class.2

Separately, a growing fear exists amongst pro-Hong Kong students that supporters of the Chinese Government might report their peers. The student’s union at the University of Warwick saw a motion to support the democratic and human rights of Hongkongers voted down by unprecedented numbers of Chinese students voting in support of Beijing.3 This example serves as a warning of the mobilisation of nationalist sentiment by China in the name of student activism.

Lord Patten of Barnes, who was the last Governor of Hong Kong from 1992 to 1997, has warned that many Chinese students who come to the UK to study are used to cameras in classes, as well as “paid informants and narks” to tell them what is going on. He has warned that unless we are careful, this could leak to UK universities.4

Nick Hillman, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute think tank, said that it must be made clear to overseas students that free speech, flags, protesting and campaigning were all legitimate activities at universities in the UK.5

It is unfortunate that all universities have not been forthcoming in taking a stand against the new National Security Law. Universities must act with their conscience, and ensure that they do not allow a growing sense of internationalism, market pressures, and financial pressures dictate their moral compass. Universities must not compromise their independence, and promotion of liberties including freedom of expression, at the hands of the pressure from the Chinese Communist Party.

Even before the NSL was in place, academic freedom at UK universities was jeopardised by Chinese influence. In November 2019, the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee warned of China’s threats to academic freedom, exposing mounting evidence of foreign influence in United Kingdom universities, including “alarming evidence” about the extent of Chinese influence on UK campuses.6 This includes the monitoring of anti-China student activity on campuses by pro-China students.7

2 ibid 3 https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/motion-backing-hong-kong-blocked-after-campaign-by-chinese-students-at- warwick-fsdfphr26 4 https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/oct/12/academics-warn-of-chilling-effect-of-hong-kong-security- law 5 https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/beijings-law-threatens-hong-kong-students-at-our-universities-warns-mp- 3kjnsp35q 6 https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201919/cmselect/cmfaff/109/109.pdf 7 http://data.parliament.uk/WrittenEvidence/CommitteeEvidence.svc/EvidenceDocument/Foreign- Affairs/Autocracies-and-UK-Foreign-Policy/Oral/102827.html

2 Concerns have also been raised about the influence of the Chinese Students and Scholars Association (CSSA) on campuses throughout the UK. The Foreign Affairs Committee also detailed how CSSA chapters had been active in attacking pro-Hong Kong protests at UK universities.8

The National Security Law and the influence of China on universities in the UK put the academic integrity of universities at risk, and universities have a duty to protect the freedom of expression of staff and students. The UK Government must take steps to guarantee that universities enjoy maximum academic freedom and ensure that Hongkongers and other academics in the UK are not subject to censorship as a result of the National Security Law. We suggest introducing punitive measures against individuals and organisations found to be undermining freedom of expression within the UK as one form of deterrent.

27/01/2021

8 https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201919/cmselect/cmfaff/109/109.pdf

3