Testimony. in Re the Livingstone Channel
INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION TESTIMONY. IN RE THE LIVINGSTONE CHANNEL ON THE REFERENCEOF THE GOVERNMENTSOF THE UNITED STATES AND THE DOMINION OF CANADA UNDER ARTICLE IX OF THE TREATY OF FAY 5, 1910 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1913 INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION. UNITEDSTATES. CANADA. 3AMES A. TAWNEY, Chairman. TH. CHASE CASGRAIN?Chairman. FRANK S. STREETER. HENRY A. POWELL. GEORGE TURNER. CHARLES A. MAGRATH. L. WHITEBVSBEY, Secretary. LAWRENCEJ. BURPEE,Secretary. 2 QUESTIONS REFERRED, “1. Under all the circumstances and conditions surrounding the navigation and other uses of the Livingstone and other channels in the Detroit River on either side of the international boundary, is the erection of any dike or other compensatory work deemed necessary or desirable for the improvement or safety of navlgation at or in the vicinityof Bois Blanc Island inconnection with rock excavation and dredg- ing in Livingstone Channel authorized by the rivers and harbors act of June 25,1910 (36 Stats., 655), and described in House Document No. 676, Sixty-first Congress, second session, sundry civil actof June 25, 1910 (36 Stats., 729), sundry civil actof March 4, 1911 (36 Stats., 1405), of the United States, andnow being carried out by theGovern- mytof the United States? 2. If in answer to question 1 any dike or other compensatory works are found to be necessary or desirable, will the work or works proposed by the United States and provided for in therivers and harbors actofJune 25,1910 (36 Stats., 655),and located 80 as to connect thenorth end of Bois Blanc Island to the southeast end of the existing cofferdam on the east side of Livingstone Channel o posite and below Stoney Island, be sufficient for the purpose; and if not what adgtional or other dikes or compen- satory works should be constructed and where should they be located in order to serve most advantageously the interests involved on both sides of the international boundary? ” 3 THE LIVINGSTONE CHANNEL.
[Show full text]