DOCSLIB.ORG

A PATTERN LANGUAGE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A PATTERN LANGUAGE Towns Buildings Construction Buildings Towns a PATTERN LANGUAGE Christopher Alexander Sara Ishikawa Murray Silverstein Max Jacobson Ingrid Fiksdahl-King Shlomo Angel The pattern language APPENDING THE PATTERN think about it, might ask. IN WHAT SITUATION can I utilize this LANGUAGE way of thinking about architecture? Where I formulated the conclusions of my work as can I find precedents of this approach a polemics with Christopher Alexander’s ‘A being used? WHAT pattern language’, understanding his work can this thinking method be useful FOR? as a manual for architects, which encom- What goals does it allow to achieve? WHAT INSTRUMENTS passes a certain amount of knowledge that , actions and in- structions does this approach entail? Alexander and his co-workers managed to 3 accumulate and which is broadly known and applied by contemporary architects. This exercise has allowed me to situate the concepts, discoveries and tools which I have been using during this year in a con- text of current knowledge of architecture. It allowed me to find out what purposes can the gained knowledge serve. The below mentioned operating techniques can be applied both to buildings and out- door spaces. I have tried to give my conclusions a struc- ture similar to the structure of ‘A pattern language’. As my findings are in a great deal ways of thinking about architecture, I tried to answer three key questions, which Cover of ‘A pattern language‘. a person, who has to tackle a problem and Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/79766.A_Pattern_ is trying to identify an appropriate way to Language (accessed: 24 June 2019). Thickening the threshold The pattern language 126.1 SOMETHING IN-BETWEEN - THRESHOLD 5 Pantheon, Rome Source: drawing by author. Thickening the threshold The pattern language of a threshold is articulated as merely a doorstep or a door. Once you have designed any two neigh- the exact extents of a threshold. This bouring public spaces you might want It is generally difficult to determine to design the transition between them. size of the threshold or the ambiguous This transition is broadly known as a naturedifficulty of isthe either transition caused between by the modest the threshold. threshold and the spaces it borders. 6 Threshold is a transition point between In what situation one realm and another. It is where the Thresholds are located inside buildings activity of transiting happens. Thresh- as transitions between inner spaces or olds usually consist of three compo- entry spaces: foyers, hallways. Court- obviously the two spaces which are as thresholds. neighbouringnents. The two each first other components and between are Thresholdsyards and cloisters can also can be distinguishedalso be identified which a division was raised. The key where an indoor space encounters an quality of a threshold is the thickness outdoor space. Such thresholds include of it, which is directly proportional porticos, porches, terraces, verandas to the size of the third component of and various walkways. the threshold. The third component is situated between the other two compo- Lastly thresholds can serve as transition nents and varies in size. It can have all zones between different areas in cities. characteristics of an autonomous space, These thresholds can be recognized in however it can also be reduced to an places where one urban space merges extent, when it almost disappears. In its with another. most reduced form the third component What for Thickening the threshold The pattern language Thresholds enable overcoming a bound- These tools entail formal, functional, ary. Thresholds allow to moderate the compositional, material and structural experience of transiting. Thresholds operations. can prepare the user for the space he is For transitional spaces refer to: about to enter or present the user with -> 34. Interchange a rapid change of environment. Thresh- olds can provide one with a feeling of -> 98. Circulation realm privacy, safety. Thresholds can take -> 101. Building throughfare part in maintaining a moderate indoor -> 112. Entrance transition climate. Thresholds often manage to 7 -> 114. Hierarchy of open space escape the rule of ownership as a result of which they are capable of being a -> 119. Arcades common meeting ground. -> 120. Paths and goals With what instruments Tools which allow to design a threshold move apart two spaces, they duplicate a space so that it can be read as an auton- omous space or, as a part of the two it connects. Some of the tools which allow to create a thick threshold are: -> 255. blurring -> 254. off-centering -> 257. incorporation through variety -> 256. punctuating space Thickening the threshold The pattern language 8 Portico Panteon, Rome Threshold. Source: drawing by author. Thickening the threshold The pattern language 98.1 LOITERING REALM / WALKING AIMLESSLY 11 Vida, Bogota, Boa Misura. Source: https://www.floornature.com/blog/boa-mistura-in-bogota-plaza-de-la-hoja-11041/ (accessed: 24 June 2019). Thickening the threshold The pattern language individuals. Loitering is remaining in a place for a long time, studying it, paying attention, It is a mark of success of a public space getting inspired. Loitering is an aimless such as a small public square(61), pe- activity. destrian street(100), park, building In what situation thoroughfare(101), public outdoor Any public space. room(69), building edge (160) if peo- 12 ple come there to do nothing else but to What for wonder around. Increasing the feeling of safety, provid- ‘Loitering is the act of remaining in a ing a common place of people to build particular public place for a protracted relations in, avoiding dominance of one time, without any apparent purpose.’1 In agent over a space, widening the ac- many countries loitering is seen as an cessible space in cities, broadening the act which precedes a criminal offence freedom of participation in public life. and is thus prohibited. The regulations With what instruments on loitering are enforced with the use of road signs, barricades, security camer- Loitering-friendly spaces invite every- as, fences, use of unpleasant surfaces one. If you wish to make the space which which warm up in sun, homeless-hostile you are designing loitering-friendly, architecture elements or presence of you should make sure that it permits police or security guards. In practice multiple ways of moving through the spaces, in which loitering is prohibited, space and multiple ways of staying in try to disperse people. They only permit the stay of a narrow group of authorized achieved if circulation is handled by the the space. The first aim can be best 1 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loiter- entire space or if the circulation routes ing) are organized in a network in which as Thickening the threshold The pattern language many as possible nodes are connected to terials in individually designed patterns, one another. murals, mosaiques. The second aim, providing multiple Loitering-friendly spaces are embedded ways of using a space, can be achieved with shelter elements. Shelter elements invite activities akin to loitering such as furniture do not belong to most common resting, sleeping. typologiesif forms used which for the are floor, immediately walls and rec - Loitering, being an aimless activity, is ognized by the user as serving a familiar well accompanied by nuclei of intense purpose. activity such as dining, drinking, shop- 13 A loitering-friendly space has the capa- ping. bility to energize the body of the user. For other improvised uses of public space refer to: space is similar to the way in which a This influence of the loitering-friendly -> 63. dancing in the street, action of a sports person. It gives one -> 58. carnival, thesport feeling equipment of vitality, expands of being the fieldalive. of -> 94. sleeping in public. One way to energize the body of the of For goal oriented uses of public spaces read: user can be imbalanced by dynamical- -> 124. activity pockets, lya person altering is the to imbalancehorizontal it. and Body vertical of the -> 241. seat spots. dimensions of space, complicating the route of a person passing through the vertical and horizontal planes, using space, tilting walls and floors from the Loitering -friendly space often uses ma- bending, ductile material for the floor. Thickening the threshold The pattern language 14 Loitering realm. Source: drawing by author. Thickening the threshold The pattern language 254. OFF-CENTRING 17 Røde Plads, Herlufsholm, Bruun & Möllers. Source: https://www.bm-la.de/projekte/rode-plads-herlufsholm/ (accessed: 24 June 2019). Thickening the threshold The pattern language In what situation Off-centring is a strategy which can suc- cessfully alter instances where the cen- tre of space is marked by an intersection of axes, a special element, gradation of size, height or rhythm to a certain point. It is questionable whether it can be suc- cessfully applied in situations where the 18 centrality of space is achieved via the form given to it by the outer partitions marking the extents of it. In central spaces the centre has a lot of importance and activity focuses around it. However the central organization of space may sometimes not stand in harmony with the function of the space which is when one may which to off-cen- tre it. What for Off-centring is a tool which allows to disrupt the centrality of a space. It can be useful not as much while designing buildings from scratch as while trans- forming existing buildings or outdoor spaces into non-hierarchical, non-sym- metrical architectures. Thickening the threshold The pattern language Off-centring is a strategy useful in -> 190. Ceiling-height variety multipurpose spaces. Off-centring is -> 129. Common areas at the heart one of the tools which lead to thicken- ing a threshold by the means of which threshold space gains a chance to serve purposes other than transiting.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Patterns Senior Member of Technical Staff and Pattern Languages Knowledge Systems Corp
    Kyle Brown An Introduction to Patterns Senior Member of Technical Staff and Pattern Languages Knowledge Systems Corp. 4001 Weston Parkway CSC591O Cary, North Carolina 27513-2303 April 7-9, 1997 919-481-4000 Raleigh, NC [email protected] http://www.ksccary.com Copyright (C) 1996, Kyle Brown, Bobby Woolf, and 1 2 Knowledge Systems Corp. All rights reserved. Overview Bobby Woolf Senior Member of Technical Staff O Patterns Knowledge Systems Corp. O Software Patterns 4001 Weston Parkway O Design Patterns Cary, North Carolina 27513-2303 O Architectural Patterns 919-481-4000 O Pattern Catalogs [email protected] O Pattern Languages http://www.ksccary.com 3 4 Patterns -- Why? Patterns -- Why? !@#$ O Learning software development is hard » Lots of new concepts O Must be some way to » Hard to distinguish good communicate better ideas from bad ones » Allow us to concentrate O Languages and on the problem frameworks are very O Patterns can provide the complex answer » Too much to explain » Much of their structure is incidental to our problem 5 6 Patterns -- What? Patterns -- Parts O Patterns are made up of four main parts O What is a pattern? » Title -- the name of the pattern » A solution to a problem in a context » Problem -- a statement of what the pattern solves » A structured way of representing design » Context -- a discussion of the constraints and information in prose and diagrams forces on the problem »A way of communicating design information from an expert to a novice » Solution -- a description of how to solve the problem » Generative:
    [Show full text]
  • Wiki As Pattern Language
    Wiki as Pattern Language Ward Cunningham Cunningham and Cunningham, Inc.1 Sustasis Foundation Portland, Oregon Michael W. Mehaffy Faculty of Architecture Delft University of Technology2 Sustasis Foundation Portland, Oregon Abstract We describe the origin of wiki technology, which has become widely influential, and its relationship to the development of pattern languages in software. We show here how the relationship is deeper than previously understood, opening up the possibility of expanded capability for wikis, including a new generation of “federated” wiki. [NOTE TO REVIEWERS: This paper is part first-person history and part theory. The history is given by one of the participants, an original developer of wiki and co-developer of pattern language. The theory points toward future potential of pattern language within a federated, peer-to-peer framework.] 1. Introduction Wiki is today widely established as a kind of website that allows users to quickly and easily share, modify and improve information collaboratively (Leuf and Cunningham, 2001). It is described on Wikipedia – perhaps its best known example – as “a website which allows its users to add, modify, or delete its content via a web browser usually using a simplified markup language or a rich-text editor” (Wikipedia, 2013). Wiki is so well established, in fact, that a Google search engine result for the term displays approximately 1.25 billion page “hits”, or pages on the World Wide Web that include this term somewhere within their text (Google, 2013a). Along with this growth, the definition of what constitutes a “wiki” has broadened since its introduction in 1995. Consider the example of WikiLeaks, where editable content would defeat the purpose of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Integration Patterns Introduction
    Enterprise Integration Patterns Gregor Hohpe Sr. Architect, ThoughtWorks [email protected] July 23, 2002 Introduction Integration of applications and business processes is a top priority for many enterprises today. Requirements for improved customer service or self-service, rapidly changing business environments and support for mergers and acquisitions are major drivers for increased integration between existing “stovepipe” systems. Very few new business applications are being developed or deployed without a major focus on integration, essentially making integratability a defining quality of enterprise applications. Many different tools and technologies are available in the marketplace to address the inevitable complexities of integrating disparate systems. Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) tool suites offer proprietary messaging mechanisms, enriched with powerful tools for metadata management, visual editing of data transformations and a series of adapters for various popular business applications. Newer technologies such as the JMS specification and Web Services standards have intensified the focus on integration technologies and best practices. Architecting an integration solution is a complex task. There are many conflicting drivers and even more possible ‘right’ solutions. Whether the architecture was in fact a good choice usually is not known until many months or even years later, when inevitable changes and additions put the original architecture to test. There is no cookbook for enterprise integration solutions. Most integration vendors provide methodologies and best practices, but these instructions tend to be very much geared towards the vendor-provided tool set and often lack treatment of the bigger picture, including underlying guidelines and principles. As a result, successful enterprise integration architects tend to be few and far in between and have usually acquired their knowledge the hard way.
    [Show full text]
  • From a Pattern Language to a Field of Centers and Beyond Patterns and Centers, Innovation, Improvisation, and Creativity
    From a Pattern Language to a Field of Centers and Beyond Patterns and Centers, Innovation, Improvisation, and Creativity Hajo Neis Illustration 1: University of Oregon in Portland Downtown Urban Campus The Campus is located in downtown Portland in adapted old warehouse buildings, and was first designed in the Oregon pattern language method with the principles of pat- terns and user participation. The White Stag building facilities are open since 2009. 144 Hajo Neis INTRODUCTION What we call now the ›overall pattern language approach‹ in architecture, urban design, and planning has grown from its original principle of ›pattern and pat- tern language‹ into a large and solid body of theory and professional work. To- day, pattern theory and practice includes a large number of principles, methods, techniques and practical project applications in which patterns themselves play a specific part within this larger body of knowledge. Not only has the pattern lan- guage approach grown in its original area of architecture, but it has also (though less triumphantly than silently) expanded into a large number of other disciplines and fields, in particular computer and software science, education, biology, com- munity psychology, and numerous practical fields. Nevertheless, we first have to acknowledge that the pattern approach originally started with a single principle almost 50 years ago, the principle of pattern and pattern language that gave the name to this school of thought and practical professional project work. In this article we want to trace some of the theoretical and practical develop- ment of the pattern method and its realization in practical projects. We want to explore how challenges and opportunities resulted in the adaptation of the pattern language method into various forms of pattern project formats and formulations including ›pattern language‹ and ›project language.‹ We want to look at various forms of innovations and techniques that deal with theoretical improvements as well as the necessities of adaptation for practical cases and projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Pattern Languages in HCI: a Critical Review
    HUMAN–COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2006, Volume 21, pp. 49–102 Copyright © 2006, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Pattern Languages in HCI: A Critical Review Andy Dearden Sheffield Hallam University Janet Finlay Leeds Metropolitan University ABSTRACT This article presents a critical review of patterns and pattern languages in hu- man–computer interaction (HCI). In recent years, patterns and pattern languages have received considerable attention in HCI for their potential as a means for de- veloping and communicating information and knowledge to support good de- sign. This review examines the background to patterns and pattern languages in HCI, and seeks to locate pattern languages in relation to other approaches to in- teraction design. The review explores four key issues: What is a pattern? What is a pattern language? How are patterns and pattern languages used? and How are values reflected in the pattern-based approach to design? Following on from the review, a future research agenda is proposed for patterns and pattern languages in HCI. Andy Dearden is an interaction designer with an interest in knowledge sharing and communication in software development. He is a senior lecturer in the Com- munication and Computing Research Centre at Sheffield Hallam University. Janet Finlay is a usability researcher with an interest in design communication and systems evaluation. She is Professor of Interactive Systems in Innovation North at Leeds Metropolitan University. 50 DEARDEN AND FINLAY CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. THE SCOPE OF THIS REVIEW 2.1. General Software Design Patterns 2.2. Interface Software Design Patterns 2.3. Interaction Design Patterns 3. A SHORT HISTORY OF PATTERNS 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • An AI Pattern Language
    AN AI PATTERN LANGUAGE M.C. Elish and Tim Hwang INTELLIGENCE & AUTONOMY INITIATIVE Data & Society This publication was produced as part of the Intelligence and Autonomy initiative (I&A) at Data & Society. I&A is supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. The Intelligence & Autonomy initiative develops research connecting the dots between robots, algorithms and automation. Our goal is to reframe policy debates around the rise of machine intelligence across sectors. For more information, visit autonomy.datasociety.net Authors: M.C. Elish and Tim Hwang Book design by Jeff Ytell and illustrations by Sarah Nicholls. Published by Data & Society, 36 West 20th Street, 11th floor, New York, NY 10011 c b a vn 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ISBN-13: 978-1539033820 ISBN-10: 1539033821 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................... 1 a. Document overview ........................................... 3 b. Project background ............................................ 4 c. Methodology ..................................................... 6 d. Definitions: What do we talk about when we talk about AI? ........................ 7 i. Artificial intelligence .......................................... 8 ii. Machine learning ............................................... 9 iii. Deep learning & neural networks .................... 10 iv. Autonomy & autonomous systems .................. 11 v. Automation ..................................................... 12 vi. Machine intelligence .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Pattern Language for Designing Application-Level Communication Protocols and the Improvement of Computer Science Education Through Cloud Computing
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2017 A Pattern Language for Designing Application-Level Communication Protocols and the Improvement of Computer Science Education through Cloud Computing Jorge Edison Lascano Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Lascano, Jorge Edison, "A Pattern Language for Designing Application-Level Communication Protocols and the Improvement of Computer Science Education through Cloud Computing" (2017). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 6547. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6547 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A PATTERN LANGUAGE FOR DESIGNING APPLICATION-LEVEL COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS AND THE IMPROVEMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION THROUGH CLOUD COMPUTING by Jorge Edison Lascano A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Computer Science Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Stephen W. Clyde, Ph.D. Curtis Dyreson, Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ ____________________ Haitao Wang, Ph.D. Young-Woo Kwon, Ph.D. Committee Member Committee Member ______________________ ____________________ Luis Gordillo, Ph.D. Mark R. McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2017 ii Copyright © Jorge Edison Lascano 2017 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT A Pattern Language for Designing Application-Level Communication Protocols and the Improvement of Computer Science Education through Cloud Computing by Jorge Edison Lascano, Doctor of Philosophy Utah State University, 2017 Major Professor: Stephen W.
    [Show full text]
  • Contract As Pattern Language
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 2013 Contract as Pattern Language Erik F. Gerding University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons, and the Contracts Commons Citation Information Erik F. Gerding, Contract as Pattern Language, 88 WASH. L. REV. 1323 (2013), available at https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/111. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 88 Wash. L. Rev. 1323 2013 Provided by: William A. Wise Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Fri Feb 24 13:37:01 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information CONTRACT AS PATTERN LANGUAGE Erik F. Gerding* INTRODUCTION Scholars and practitioners routinely talk about the "architecture" of individual contracts.' Many observers have also noted the broad-brush similarity between the drafting of legal contracts and computer programming or coding.2 It is strange, then, that contract law scholarship has overlooked part of the landmark literature linking design in architecture and computer code.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Software Examples of Software Design Patterns Автор: Michael Duell
    Non-Software Examples of Software Design Patterns Автор: Michael Duell. Хорошая, хоть и старая (97 год) статья в которой приведены примеры применения паттернов в вещах, которые не имеют отношения к разработке. Такой подход отлично иллюстрирует паттерны и делает их более доступными для понимания. Например отлично показан паттерн Фасад: интерфейсы офисных устройств можно сильно упростить с помощью секретарши. Или например паттерн Бридж, который показан на примере выключателя которым можно управлять лампочкой, вентилятором или любым другим прибором. Non-Software Examples of Software Design Patterns by Michael Duell Abstract Software design patterns have roots in the architectural patterns of Christopher Alexander, and in the object movement. According to Alexander, patterns repeat themselves, since they are a generic solution to a given system of forces. The object movement looks to the real world for insights into modeling software relationships. With these dual roots, it seems reasonable that software design patterns should be repeated in real world objects. This paper presents a real world, non software instance of each design pattern from the book, Design Patterns - Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software [13]. The paper also discusses the implications of non-software examples on the communicative power of a pattern language, and on design pattern training. 1. Introduction Within the software industry, a growing community of patterns proponents exists. The roots of the patterns movement are found in the writings of architect Christopher Alexander, who describes a pattern as a generic solution to a given system of forces in the world [1]. Alexander's patterns can be observed in everyday structures. Each pattern in A Pattern Language[2] includes a picture of an archetypal example of the pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Session 11 Integration Patterns
    ﺃﻛﺎﺩﻳﻣﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺣﻛﻭﻣﺔ ﺍﻹﻟﻛﺗﺭﻭﻧﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺳﻁﻳﻧﻳﺔ The Palestinian eGovernment Academy www.egovacademy.ps Tutorial III: Process Integration and Service Oriented Architectures Session 11 Integration Patterns Prepared By Mohammed Melhem PalGov © 2011 1 About This tutorial is part of the PalGov project, funded by the TEMPUS IV program of the Commission of the European Communities, grant agreement 511159-TEMPUS-1- 2010-1-PS-TEMPUS-JPHES. The project website: www.egovacademy.ps Project Consortium: Birzeit University, Palestine University of Trento, Italy (Coordinator ) Palestine Polytechnic University, Palestine Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Palestine Technical University, Palestine Université de Savoie, France Ministry of Telecom and IT, Palestine University of Namur, Belgium Ministry of Interior, Palestine TrueTrust, UK Ministry of Local Government, Palestine Coordinator: Dr. Mustafa Jarrar Birzeit University, P.O.Box 14- Birzeit, Palestine Telfax:+972 2 2982935 [email protected] © 2011 2 © Copyright Notes Everyone is encouraged to use this material, or part of it, but should properly cite the project (logo and website), and the author of that part. No part of this tutorial may be reproduced or modified in any form or by any means, without prior written permission from the project, who have the full copyrights on the material. Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike CC-BY-NC-SA This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non- commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. PalGov © 2011 3 Tutorial Map Intended Learning Objectives A: Knowledge and Understanding Title T Name 3a1: Demonstrate knowledge of the fundamentals of middleware. 3a2: Describe the concept behind web service protocols.
    [Show full text]
  • A Development Process Generative Pattern Language
    Proceedings of PLoP/94, Monticello, Il., August 1994 AT&T Bell Laboratories A Development Process Generative Pattern Language James O. Coplien – AT&T Bell Laboratories (708) 713-5384 [email protected] 1. Introduction This paper introduces a family of patterns that can be used to shape a new organization and its development processes. Patterns support emerging techniques in the software design community, where they are finding a new home as a way of understanding and creating computer programs. There is an increasing awareness that new program structuring techniques must be supported by suitable management techniques, and by appropriate organization structures; orga- nizational patterns are one powerful way to capture these. We believe that patterns are particularly suitable to organizational construction and evolution. Patterns form the basis of much of modern cultural anthropology: a culture is defined by its patterns of relationships. Also, while the works of Christopher Alexander1 deal with town planning and building architecture to support human enterprise and inter- action, it can be said that organization is the modern analogue to architecture in contemporary professional organiza- tions. Organizational patterns have a first-order effect on the ability of people to carry on. We believe that the physical architecture of the buildings supporting such work are the dual of the organizational patterns; these two worlds cross in the work of Thomas Allen at MIT.2 There is nothing new in taking a pattern perspective to organizational analysis. What is novel about the work here is its attempt to use patterns in a generative way. All architecture fundamentally concerns itself with control;3 here we use architecture to supplant process as the (indirect) means to controlling people in an organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration Patterns Integration Patterns
    Integration Patterns Integration Patterns patterns & practices David Trowbridge, Microsoft Platform Architecture Guidance Ulrich Roxburgh, Microsoft Consulting Services (Australia) Gregor Hohpe, ThoughtWorks, Inc. Dragos Manolescu, ThoughtWorks, Inc. E.G. Nadhan, EDS ISBN 0-7356-1850-X Information in this document, including URL and other Internet Web site references, is subject to change without notice. Unless otherwise noted, the example companies, organizations, products, domain names, e-mail addresses, logos, people, places, and events depicted herein are fictitious, and no association with any real company, organization, product, domain name, e-mail address, logo, person, place, or event is intended or should be inferred. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. Without limiting the rights under copyright, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft may have patents, patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights covering subject matter in this document. Except as expressly provided in any written license agreement from Microsoft, the furnishing of this document does not give you any license to these patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property. © 2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, MS-DOS, Windows, Windows NT, Windows Server, Active Directory, BizTalk, InfoPath, Visio, Visual Basic, and Visual Studio are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]