The Principal Fouling Organisms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Principal Fouling Organisms CHAPTER 9 The Principal Fouling Organisms The purpose of this chapter is to present an ele- an introduction to the scientific literature wil find mentary account of the principal organisms found references at the end of the chapter. When identi- in fouling communities in order that those un- fication to the scientific name is essential, speci- trained in zoology may observe fouling with mens should be sent to the United States National greater understanding. It contains an account of Museum, Washington, D. C., or to a museum of the appearance, habits, mode of dispersal, and natural history where they can be classified by ex- relative importance of these forms. perts. The descriptions are intended only to enable practical workers to recognize the commoner or- MICROSCOPIC FOULING ORGANISMS ganisms by the name of the group to which they The microscopic fouling organisms include bac- A B FIGURE 1. Photomicrographs of slime Elm organisms. A. A type of bacteria from a bacterial slime film. From Dobson (5). B. A diatom slime film. belong. In the case of the barnacles, the more com- tcria, diatoms, protozoa, and rotifers. The bacteria mon North American species are described in suf- aLd diatoms produce slime films which form ficient detail to indicate how species may be iden- promptly on submerged surfaces. The protozoa are tified, but the descriptions are inadequate to per- commonly associated with these films though they mit the inexperienced worker to classify barnacles take no part in their production. The successive to the species with certainty. The identification changes in these populations on a submerged sur- and naming of the species of all fouling organisms face are shown in Figure 1, Chapter 4. It is char- are beyond the scope of this work. acteristic that the early multiplication of bacteria Three manuals, prepared to assist dockyard work- is followed by the development of diatoms and ers in reporting the conditions of ship bottoms, protozoa in the slime. which describe and ilustrate fouling organisms in In addition to the living forms in slime films, an even more elementary way, are listed as Refer- organic and inorganic detritus, mud, sand, and ences 96, 97, and 98. other particulate materials suspended in sea water Persons desiring more complete descriptions or become incorporated in the film. A common type 118 THE PRINCIPAL FOULING ORGANISMS 119 of slime bacteria is shown in Figure 1A; a slime The importance of slime films is twofold: they consisting predominantly of diatoms is ilustrated may influence directly the attachment of. other or- in Figure lB. ganisms; and they may decompose paint materials or otherwise alter the activity of a paint. The direct Bacteria and Bacterial Slimes effect of the slime on the attachment of other or- The bacteria which form slime films are present . ganisms has been discussed Ín Chapter 4, where in sea water at all times of the year, though their it is shown that the slime film may favor the at- numbers vary within wide limits depending upon tachment of several species of macroscopic ani- available organic matter, temperature, and degree mals. The effects of slime bacteria on paints and of pollution. A slime fim may, therefore, be ex- pected whenever a surface is submerged, but there 25 are marked seasonal variations in its rate of de- velopment. Its magnitude at different seasons 20 u 15 parallels the sea temperature. The total weight of o ii the fim varies about thirtyfold-from a few ~ w hundred micrograms per square centimeter in the f- winter, to 4000 in the summer. The amount of sea water contained in a square centimeter of film is of the order of .005 to .05 cubic centimeters. The rm SEA SALTS '" dry material of the film is about 30 per cent of the ~ D INSOLUABLE ASH total wet fim. Figure 2 shows the dry weight of -! :1 2.0 D ORGANIC MATTER slime developed during each thirty-day period "~ I- throughout a year at Woods Hole. Organic matter ;: makes up 10 to 25 per cent of the total dry weight, ~ 1.0 and averages about 20 per cent. During the colder o parts of the year the insoluble ash is low, increas- ing during the summer to as much. as 60 per cent of the entire weight. The remainder of the fim FMAMJJASON D consists of sea salts. FIGURE 2. Weight and composition of slime films developed in 30-day period, at Woods Hole, 1940-1941. (Above). The sea water temperature. The initial step in the production of a slime fim is the attachment of bacteria to the sub- merged surface. After attachment the bacterial paint materials are discussed in Chapters 14 and cells reproduce by dividing. Each of the resulting 16. For specific works on bacterial and slime films, daughter cells then grows to normal size and di- see References 10-17. vides again. Bacterial counts on developing slime films indicate that the population doubles in about Diatoms four hours (14). The reproductive rate depends Diatoms are microscopic plants which may live mainly upon the temperature and the availability suspended in the water or attached to submerged of nutrients. Thus, the amount of slime on a sur- surfaces. They contain a brown pigment which face submerged in the sea may depend both upon gives them a characteristic color. They also con- the population of bacteria originally present in the tain chlorophyll and, in the presence of light, water and upon their growth after attachment. manufacture their own foods from the chemical Thirty-seven kinds of bacteria reported from nutrients in the water. Ilustrations of some com- fouled structures are listed in the Appendix to mon diatoms are given in Figure 3. Chapter 10. It has been observed that 74 per cent - Each diatom is a single cell enclosed in a siliceous of the bacteria isolated from panels suspended in shell which consists of two similar halves, one the sea were able to attach themselves to surfaces fittng inside the other like a pil-box and its cover. firmly enough so that they could not be washed In many species the shells are simple in structure, off with gently running water (15). Among these others have hair-like or horn-like projections. The periphitic or attaching bacteria, 21 distinct and shells are marked with many rows of minute dots representative types were isolated and studied. All or striations which are so fie, indeed, that the were gram-negative rods which varied greatly in usual test of the quality of a microscope is its length. Only 4 of them were capsulated, and none ability to make them visible. Figure 3A indicates of them produced spores. None were found to the construction of the shell and the arrangement have special attachment organs. of the cell contents. 120 MARINE FOULING AND ITS PREVENTION !t,~.'..'...c.'h......:"d:~j''7~K''HO~' '~~~1~ I 3 A c E D B ~~w.;i ::n':,,:~:~ ci~~i~~~lli:I:II!IWNlt,I:I',~im::~m IIIHUlll:liIIHII=rIH:IIfI ~:,¡¡:~i~i¡'~i~h.".ii;;iî~iÎi~i~~i~:.~~!;ii~~¡~ 1::~~~~;~::;!:!~ïi~::~;;!~:;i~~i!¡i:ti~~:~~.'~~~~ e::~!':":::1:'::':.:::I':I:'''I::!III::;::I:.;¡:'I!:i:::I:,m::!;i:; ~41!"..!':,":::::I:!::lm::I:!,,';!::i::.:::I:,~ -= ( :~~:;.,,,~~,,,,,.";;,,,~;',~,,,:';::::::;:;;;¡~i:=ii~~'t~~~¡;=!~~~¡;í:~::m.!~ ~~~~:~~~'f¡j~~~~~:::~~:~":'~:~¡,:~!;:;i:;;I;¡::;::';:~~.:";;;'~:::;:;::--~I~':.~:::-,.::) ci:r:~~'~:::::::::'~::~~~~~:'::::~::~~:!~:::;ir.!:~:::~::r.~~::~~:'imm:''::~:::~~::~\:::ti::¡¡~\:im::::::\::::~:::::::,:::~::::::: ~::::::!:'::'::~::::::::!.: ,-:: ~-,: ':'.: "::':':: G F FIGUR 3. Diatoms. A. Diagrammatic lengthwise sections of three stages in From Boyer (18). the division of a diatom. 1 is the mature parent cell; in 2, the halves of the shell D. Three forms of Fragilaria. Actuallength of the longest individual: 0.07 mm. are being pushed apart and the division of the cell contents has begun; in 3, the From Boyer (18). daughter cells are complete and the new "male" halves are forming within the E. Top and bottom views of Cocconeis pediculus. Actuallength: 0.03 mm. From edges of the parent's shells. Modified from Wolle (20). Boyer (18). B. Licmophora llabel/ala. A stalked colonialdiatom, Several fan-like groups F. Various forms of Synedra. Actuallength of the longest individual: 0128 mm. of individual diatoms are attached to the branches of the stalk. Actuallength of From Boyer (18). individuals in the uppermost group: 0.03 mm. From Wolle (20). G. Meloseira nummuloides. Eight individuals connected to form a fiament. C. Seven species of Navicula. Actuallength of the longest individual: 0.07 mm. Actual width of fiament: 0.02 mm. From Wolle (20). All diatoms have a gelatinous covering over the other surfaces. The slimes formed by diatoms are shell. Some colonial species, like that shown in less slippery than bacterial slimes, and when dry Figure 3B, have their gelatinous coverings ex- are gray or greenish-gray (10). Fresh dìatom tended as tubes or stalks which attach to immersed slimes may be colored or gritty, may resemble objects and prevent the diatoms from being car- brown oil, or look like bubble-filled mud. ried away. These colonies may break up, disperse For detailed works on diatoms, Boyer (18), Van in water currents, and establish new çolonies on Heurck (19), and Wolle (20) may be consulted. THE PRINCIPAL FOULING ORGANISMS 121 Protozoa B. Branching tree-shaped growths, the branches not expanded at the tips. Bryozoa p. 141 Protozoa are single-celled animals which range C. Straight or branching growths, each thread ter- in size from .002 milimeters to several centimeters minatingin an expanded tip.......... Hydroids p.l44 in the greatest dimension. Their minute size and D. Rounded soft spongy masses. Tunicates p. 147 their failure to form massive colonies render them The names applied to fouling organisms by unimportant as fouling organisms.
Recommended publications
  • "Lophophorates" Brachiopoda Echinodermata Asterozoa
    Deuterostomes Bryozoa Phoronida "lophophorates" Brachiopoda Echinodermata Asterozoa Stelleroidea Asteroidea Ophiuroidea Echinozoa Holothuroidea Echinoidea Crinozoa Crinoidea Chaetognatha (arrow worms) Hemichordata (acorn worms) Chordata Urochordata (sea squirt) Cephalochordata (amphioxoius) Vertebrata PHYLUM CHAETOGNATHA (70 spp) Arrow worms Fossils from the Cambrium Carnivorous - link between small phytoplankton and larger zooplankton (1-15 cm long) Pharyngeal gill pores No notochord Peculiar origin for mesoderm (not strictly enterocoelous) Uncertain relationship with echinoderms PHYLUM HEMICHORDATA (120 spp) Acorn worms Pharyngeal gill pores No notochord (Stomochord cartilaginous and once thought homologous w/notochord) Tornaria larvae very similar to asteroidea Bipinnaria larvae CLASS ENTEROPNEUSTA (acorn worms) Marine, bottom dwellers CLASS PTEROBRANCHIA Colonial, sessile, filter feeding, tube dwellers Small (1-2 mm), "U" shaped gut, no gill slits PHYLUM CHORDATA Body segmented Axial notochord Dorsal hollow nerve chord Paired gill slits Post anal tail SUBPHYLUM UROCHORDATA Marine, sessile Body covered in a cellulose tunic ("Tunicates") Filter feeder (» 200 L/day) - perforated pharnx adapted for filtering & repiration Pharyngeal basket contractable - squirts water when exposed at low tide Hermaphrodites Tadpole larvae w/chordate characteristics (neoteny) CLASS ASCIDIACEA (sea squirt/tunicate - sessile) No excretory system Open circulatory system (can reverse blood flow) Endostyle - (homologous to thyroid of vertebrates) ciliated groove
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Life-Cycle Analysis of Pacific Ocean Zooplankton by Video Microscopy and DNA Barcoding: Crustacea
    Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology Research Article Open Access Diversity and life-cycle analysis of Pacific Ocean zooplankton by video microscopy and DNA barcoding: Crustacea Abstract Volume 10 Issue 3 - 2021 Determining the DNA sequencing of a small element in the mitochondrial DNA (DNA Peter Bryant,1 Timothy Arehart2 barcoding) makes it possible to easily identify individuals of different larval stages of 1Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of marine crustaceans without the need for laboratory rearing. It can also be used to construct California, USA taxonomic trees, although it is not yet clear to what extent this barcode-based taxonomy 2Crystal Cove Conservancy, Newport Coast, CA, USA reflects more traditional morphological or molecular taxonomy. Collections of zooplankton were made using conventional plankton nets in Newport Bay and the Pacific Ocean near Correspondence: Peter Bryant, Department of Newport Beach, California (Lat. 33.628342, Long. -117.927933) between May 2013 and Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, USA, January 2020, and individual crustacean specimens were documented by video microscopy. Email Adult crustaceans were collected from solid substrates in the same areas. Specimens were preserved in ethanol and sent to the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding at the Received: June 03, 2021 | Published: July 26, 2021 University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada for sequencing of the COI DNA barcode. From 1042 specimens, 544 COI sequences were obtained falling into 199 Barcode Identification Numbers (BINs), of which 76 correspond to recognized species. For 15 species of decapods (Loxorhynchus grandis, Pelia tumida, Pugettia dalli, Metacarcinus anthonyi, Metacarcinus gracilis, Pachygrapsus crassipes, Pleuroncodes planipes, Lophopanopeus sp., Pinnixa franciscana, Pinnixa tubicola, Pagurus longicarpus, Petrolisthes cabrilloi, Portunus xantusii, Hemigrapsus oregonensis, Heptacarpus brevirostris), DNA barcoding allowed the matching of different life-cycle stages (zoea, megalops, adult).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Jamaican Mangrove Areas
    BIODIVERSITY OF JAMAICAN MANGROVE AREAS Volume 7 Mangrove Biotypes VI: Common Fauna BY MONA WEBBER (PH.D) PROJECT FUNDED BY: 2 MANGROVE BIOTYPE VI: COMMON FAUNA CNIDARIA, ANNELIDA, CRUSTACEANS, MOLLUSCS & ECHINODERMS CONTENTS Page Introduction…………………………………………………………………… 4 List of fauna by habitat……………………………………………………….. 4 Cnidaria Aiptasia tagetes………………………………………………………… 6 Cassiopeia xamachana………………………………………………… 8 Annelida Sabellastarte magnifica………………………………………………… 10 Sabella sp………………………………………………………………. 11 Crustacea Calinectes exasperatus…………………………………………………. 12 Calinectes sapidus……………………………………………………… 13 Portunis sp……………………………………………………………… 13 Lupella forcepes………………………………………………………… 14 Persephone sp. …………………………………………………………. 15 Uca spp………………………………………………………………..... 16 Aratus pisoni……………………………………………………………. 17 Penaeus duorarum……………………………………………………… 18 Panulirus argus………………………………………………………… 19 Alphaeus sp…………………………………………………………….. 20 Mantis shrimp………………………………………………………….. 21 Balanus eberneus………………………………………………………. 22 Balanus amphitrite…………………………………………………….. 23 Chthamalus sp………………………………………………………….. 23 Mollusca Brachidontes exustus…………………………………………………… 24 Isognomon alatus………………………………………………………. 25 Crassostrea rhizophorae……………………………………………….. 26 Pinctada radiata………………………………………………………... 26 Plicatula gibosa………………………………………………………… 27 Martesia striata…………………………………………………………. 27 Perna viridis……………………………………………………………. 28 Trachycardium muricatum……………………………………..……… 30 Anadara chemnitzi………………………………………………...……. 30 Diplodonta punctata………………………………………………..…... 32 Dosinia sp…………………………………………………………..….
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Worth Lagoon
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ...................................... 1 Park Significance .............................................................................. 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN ................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................. 7 Management Authority and Responsibility ............................................ 7 Park Management Goals .................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................. 8 Public Participation ........................................................................... 9 Other Designations ........................................................................... 9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 15 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT ................................... 15 Natural Resources .......................................................................... 16 Topography ............................................................................... 20 Geology .................................................................................... 21 Soils ......................................................................................... 21 Minerals ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Copper Tolerance of Amphibalanus Amphitrite As Observed in Central Florida
    Copper Tolerance of Amphibalanus amphitrite as Observed in Central Florida by Hannah Grace Brinson Bachelor of Science Oceanography Florida Institute of Technology 2015 A thesis submitted to Department of Ocean Engineering and Sciences at Florida Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Science in Biological Oceanography Melbourne, Florida December 2017 We the undersigned committee hereby approve the attached thesis, “Copper Tolerance of Amphibalanus amphitrite as observed in Central Florida,” by Hannah Grace Brinson. ________________________________ Emily Ralston, Ph.D. Research Assistant Professor of Ocean Engineering and Sciences; Department of Ocean Engineering and Sciences Major Advisor ________________________________ Geoffrey Swain, Ph.D. Professor of Oceanography and Ocean Engineering; Department of Ocean Engineering and Sciences ________________________________ Kevin B. Johnson, Ph.D. Chair of Ocean Sciences; Professor of Oceanography and Environmental Sciences; Department of Ocean Engineering and Sciences ________________________________ Richard Aronson, Ph.D. Department Head and Professor of Biological Sciences; Department of Biological Sciences ________________________________ Dr. Marco Carvalho Dean of College of Engineering and Computing Abstract Copper Tolerance of Amphibalanus amphitrite as observed in Central Florida by Hannah Grace Brinson Major Advisor: Emily Ralston, Ph.D. Copper tolerance in the invasive barnacle Amphibalanus amphitrite has been observed in Florida
    [Show full text]
  • Sponges and Bryozoans of Sandusky Bay
    Ohio Naturalist. [Vol. 1, No. SPONGES AND BRYOZOANS OF SANDUSKY BAY. F. L. LANDACRE. The two small groups of fresh water sponges and Bryozoa re- ceived some attention at the Lake laboratory during the summer of 1900 All our fresh water sponges belong to one family, the SpongiUidae, which has about seven genera. They differ from the marine sponges- in two particulars. They form skeletons of silicon only, while marine sponges may form silicious or limy or spongin skeletons. The spongin skeleton-is the-one that gives the bath sponge its value.. They also form winter buds or statoblasts which carry the sponge over the winter and reproduce it again in the spring. This peculiar process was probably acquired on account of the changes in temperature and in amount of moisture to which animals living in fresh water streams are subjected. The sponge dies in the fall of the year and its skeleton of silicious spines or spicules can be found with no protoplasm. The character of the spines in the body of the sponge and those surrounding the statoblast differ greatly, and those around the statoblast are the main reliance in identifying sponges. So that if a statoblast is found the sponge from which it came can be determined, and on the other hand it is frequently very difficult to determine the species of a sponge if it has not yet formed its stato- blast. The statoblast is a globular or disc-shaped, nitroginous cell with a chimney-like opening where the protoplasm escapes in the spring. The adult sponge is non-sexual but the statoblasts give rise to ova and spermatozoa which unite and produce a new sponge.
    [Show full text]
  • An Invitation to Monitor Georgia's Coastal Wetlands
    An Invitation to Monitor Georgia’s Coastal Wetlands www.shellfish.uga.edu By Mary Sweeney-Reeves, Dr. Alan Power, & Ellie Covington First Printing 2003, Second Printing 2006, Copyright University of Georgia “This book was prepared by Mary Sweeney-Reeves, Dr. Alan Power, and Ellie Covington under an award from the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of OCRM and NOAA.” 2 Acknowledgements Funding for the development of the Coastal Georgia Adopt-A-Wetland Program was provided by a NOAA Coastal Incentive Grant, awarded under the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Coastal Zone Management Program (UGA Grant # 27 31 RE 337130). The Coastal Georgia Adopt-A-Wetland Program owes much of its success to the support, experience, and contributions of the following individuals: Dr. Randal Walker, Marie Scoggins, Dodie Thompson, Edith Schmidt, John Crawford, Dr. Mare Timmons, Marcy Mitchell, Pete Schlein, Sue Finkle, Jenny Makosky, Natasha Wampler, Molly Russell, Rebecca Green, and Jeanette Henderson (University of Georgia Marine Extension Service); Courtney Power (Chatham County Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission); Dr. Joe Richardson (Savannah State University); Dr. Chandra Franklin (Savannah State University); Dr. Dionne Hoskins (NOAA); Dr. Charles Belin (Armstrong Atlantic University); Dr. Merryl Alber (University of Georgia); (Dr. Mac Rawson (Georgia Sea Grant College Program); Harold Harbert, Kim Morris-Zarneke, and Michele Droszcz (Georgia Adopt-A-Stream); Dorset Hurley and Aimee Gaddis (Sapelo Island National Estuarine Research Reserve); Dr. Charra Sweeney-Reeves (All About Pets); Captain Judy Helmey (Miss Judy Charters); Jan Mackinnon and Jill Huntington (Georgia Department of Natural Resources).
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Species of Bugula (Bryozoa) Along the Atlantic Coasts of Europe
    Aquatic Invasions (2011) Volume 6, Issue 1: 17–31 doi: 10.3391/ai.2011.6.1.03 Open Access © 2011 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2011 REABIC Research Article Alien species of Bugula (Bryozoa) along the Atlantic coasts of Europe John S. Ryland1*, John D.D. Bishop2, Hans De Blauwe3, Aliya El Nagar2, Dan Minchin4, Christine A. Wood2 and Anna L.E. Yunnie2 1Department of Pure and Applied Ecology, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK 2Marine Biological Association of the UK, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB, UK 3Watergang 6, 8380 Dudzele, Belgium 4Marine Organism Investigations, Ballina, Killaloe, Co. Clare, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] (JSR), [email protected] (JDDB), [email protected] (HDeB), [email protected] (AEN), [email protected] (DM), [email protected] (CAW), [email protected] (ALEY) *Corresponding author Received: 22 June 2010 / Accepted: 9 November 2010 / Published online: 9 December 2010 Abstract Three apparently non-native species of Bugula occur in marinas and harbours in Atlantic Europe. The most common, B. neritina, was known from a few sites in southern Britain and northern France during the 20th century, following its discovery at Plymouth by 1911. During the 1950-60s it was abundant in a dock heated by power station effluent at Swansea, south Wales, where it flourished until the late 1960s, while water temperatures were 7-10°C above ambient. It disappeared after power generation ceased, when summer temperatures probably became insufficient to support breeding. Details of disappearances have not been recorded but B. neritina was not seen in Britain between c1970 and 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Bryozoans (Ectoprocta) of the Indian River Area (Florida)
    MARINE BRYOZOANS (ECTOPROCTA) OF THE INDIAN RIVER AREA (FLORIDA) JUDITH E. WINSTON BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY VOLUME 173 : ARTICLE 2 NEW YORK : 1982 MARINE BRYOZOANS (ECTOPROCTA) OF THE INDIAN RIVER AREA (FLORIDA) JUDITH E. WINSTON Assistant Curator, Department of Invertebrates American Museum of Natural History BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Volume 173, article 2, pages 99-176, figures 1-94, tables 1-10 Issued June 28, 1982 Price: $5.30 a copy Copyright © American Museum of Natural History 1982 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract 102 Introduction 102 Materials and Methods 103 Systematic Accounts 106 Ctenostomata 106 Alcyonidium polyoum (Hassall), 1841 106 Alcyonidium polypylum Marcus, 1941 106 Nolella stipata Gosse, 1855 106 Anguinella palmata van Beneden, 1845 108 Victorella pavida Saville Kent, 1870 108 Sundanella sibogae (Harmer), 1915 108 Amathia alternata Lamouroux, 1816 108 Amathia distans Busk, 1886 110 Amathia vidovici (Heller), 1867 110 Bowerbankia gracilis Leidy, 1855 110 Bowerbankia imbricata (Adams), 1798 Ill Bowerbankia maxima, New Species Ill Zoobotryon verticillatum (Delle Chiaje), 1828 113 Valkeria atlantica (Busk), 1886 114 Aeverrillia armata (Verrill), 1873 114 Cheilostomata 114 Aetea truncata (Landsborough), 1852 114 Aetea sica (Couch), 1844 116 Conopeum tenuissimum (Canu), 1908 116 IConopeum seurati (Canu), 1908 117 Membranipora arborescens (Canu and Bassler), 1928 117 Membranipora savartii (Audouin), 1926 119 Membranipora tuberculata (Bosc), 1802 119 Membranipora tenella Hincks,
    [Show full text]
  • Annals 2/Ross & Ross
    Paper in: Patrick N. Wyse Jackson & Mary E. Spencer Jones (eds) (2008) Annals of Bryozoology 2: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans. International Bryozoology Association, Dublin, pp. viii+442. TWO HUNDRED YEARS OF AUSTRALIAN BRYOZOOLOGY 271 Two hundred years of Australian bryozoology June R.P. Ross* and Charles A. Ross† *Department of Biology, MS 9160 Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA. †Department of Geology, MS 9080 Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225, USA. 1. Introduction 1.1 Development of Australian bryozoology 1.2 Stratigraphic Distribution of Studies 1.3 Geographic Distribution of Studies 2. Tertiary and Recent Bryozoologists 2.1 Early Discoveries 2.2 Second half of the 19th century 3. Twentieth century 3.1 Further Exploration of Coastal Seas 3.2 Western Australia 3.3 Introduced bryozoans 3.4 Bryozoan sediment facies 4. Paleozoic Bryozoa 4.1 Late Paleozoic 4.2 Lower Paleozoic 4.3 Current Knowledge 5. Acknowledgements 6. Bibliography of Australian bryozoology and selected references 1. Introduction 1.1 Development of Australian bryozoology In the 18th and 19th centuries the southern seas remained one of the vast unknown areas of the world as explorers sought to discover new regions of the globe. Australia remained a largely poorly known region; its continental coasts unmapped except in the vaguest outline. Flinder’s survey in 1825 in the small vessel ‘Tom Thumb’ succeeded in mapping the entire coast line. Early Australian bryozoan studies up until about 1850 parallel these explorations and are from collections that were returned to Europe by French and British 272 ANNALS OF BRYOZOOLOGY 2 Figure 1.—Map of Australia showing various basins and ‘basement’ areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryozoans, Brachiopods, and Phoronida Originate from the Common Ancestor 31 January 2018
    Bryozoans, brachiopods, and phoronida originate from the common ancestor 31 January 2018 similar to cnidarian polyps and sometimes form moss-like carpets; Phoronida resemble annelid worms, and brachiopods have shells that make them look like clams. Even the lophophore organs are organized differently—some have just a crown of tentacles; in others, tentacles are located spirally or form a helicoidal coils. But all these animals have a sessile lifestyle, are attached to substrate, and feed in similar manner. Different types of animals from the Lophophorata group. From left to right: bryozoans (Bryozoa), brachiopods For many years, scientists have argued whether (Brachiopoda), phoronids (Phoronida). Credit: Alexander these types are related. In the past 20 years, Semyonov/MSU genetics and molecular biology were included into the range of zoological methods. The genomes of bryozoans were slightly different from those of Phoronida and brachiopds, and biologists started to A biologist from Lomonosov Moscow State believe that the former type was unlikely to be University has studied the nervous system of the closely related to the latter two. Still, they did not adult phoronida using modern methods and know how to regard bryozoans. Some considered presented new facts regarding the taxonomy of them as sister group of all bilaterians, which have invertebrates, proving that phoronids, barchiopods symmetrical bodies, and others included them with and bryozoans are relatives contrary to earlier other small, colonial animals. conclusions. The results of the work were published in Scientific Reports. Elena Temereva used modern methods of immunocytochemistry and studied the innervation Phoronida is a poorly studied phylum of of the lophophore and tentacles in adult phoronid invertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Echinodermata
    Echinodermata Gr : spine skin 6500 spp all marine except for few estuarine, none freshwater 1) pentamerous radial symmetry (adults) *larvae bilateral symmetrical 2) spines 3) endoskeleton mesodermally-derived ossicles calcareous plates up to 95% CaCO3, up to 15% MgCO3, salts, trace metals, small amount of organic materials 4) water vascular system (WVS) 5) tube feet (podia) Unicellular (acellular) Multicellular (metazoa) protozoan protists Poorly defined Diploblastic tissue layers Triploblastic Cnidaria Porifera Ctenophora Placozoa Uncertain Acoelomate Coelomate Pseudocoelomate Priapulida Rotifera Chaetognatha Platyhelminthes Nematoda Gastrotricha Rhynchocoela (Nemertea) Kinorhyncha Entoprocta Mesozoa Acanthocephala Loricifera Gnathostomulida Nematomorpha Protostomes Uncertain (misfits) Deuterostomes Annelida Mollusca Echinodermata Brachiopoda Hemichordata Arthropoda Phoronida Onychophora Bryozoa Chordata Pentastomida Pogonophora Sipuncula Echiura 1 Chapter 14: Echinodermata Classes: 1) Asteroidea (Gr: characterized by star-like) 1600 spp 2) Ophiuroidea (Gr: snake-tail-like) 2100 spp 3) Echinoidea (Gr: hedgehog-form) 1000 spp 4) Holothuroidea (Gr: sea cucumber-like) 1200 spp 5) Crinoidea (Gr: lily-like) stalked – 100 spp nonstalked, motile comatulid (feather stars)- 600 spp Asteroidea sea stars/starfish arms not sharply marked off from central star shaped disc spines fixed pedicellariae ambulacral groove open tube feet with suckers on oral side anus/madreporite aboral 2 Figure 22.01 Pincushion star, Culcita navaeguineae, preys on coral
    [Show full text]