Guggenheim Museum Archives Reel-To-Reel Collection “Post Object Sculpture” with Jack Burnham, 1967 Good Afternoon, Ladies An

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Guggenheim Museum Archives Reel-To-Reel Collection “Post Object Sculpture” with Jack Burnham, 1967 Good Afternoon, Ladies An Guggenheim Museum Archives Reel-to-Reel collection “Post Object Sculpture” with Jack Burnham, 1967 MALE 1 Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the third in a series of lectures on contemporary sculpture, presented by the museum on the occasion of the Fifth Guggenheim International Exhibition. Today’s lecture is by Mr. Jack Wesley Burnham. Mr. Burnham is an individual who combines the extraordinary qualities of being both artist and scientist, as well as writer. He was born in 1931 in New York City. He studied at the Boston Museum School, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He holds an engineering degree. He holds the degrees of Bachelor of Fine Arts and Master of Fine Arts from Yale University, at which institution he was on the faculty. [00:01:00] And he’s at present a professor at Northwestern University. He is the author of a major new study of modern sculpture, to be published next year by Braziller in New York, entitled Beyond Modern Sculpture. His lecture today is entitled, “Post-Object Sculpture.” After the lecture, there will be a short question-and-answer period. Mr. Burnham. JACK BURNHAM Mr. [Fry?], I’d like to thank you for inviting me. And I’d like to [00:02:00] thank all of you for being here today. I’m going to read part of this lecture, and part of it will be fairly extemporaneous. But I’d like to begin by saying that I find the task of speaking on post- object sculpture difficult for two reasons. First, because the rationale behind object sculpture and the art form itself have developed to such a sophisticated degree in the past two years. Most of the top critical energies of this decade have devoted themselves to this area of sculpture because it has taken up the challenge of propelling the [wanting?] forces of formalism one or two steps forward, hopefully. The literature in this area is presently formidable and convincing. Secondly, I’m not quite sure, but I have a suspicion that the term “post-object sculpture,” as applied to any form of art of the future, is a misnomer. The [00:03:00] reason for this is that the term “sculpture” implies certain pre-requisites or pre-conditions, which I don’t think the new form will or can follow. It’s been the near-heroic task of object sculpture to retain the last few invariant qualities of sculpture. But to the more sensitively-aware object sculptures, I suspect they understand the cost of holding on to these qualities. The new aesthetic of object sculpture, as it is called by some, owes a good deal to the insightful text of Ad Reinhardt, who, even by the late 1950s, had grasped the need for post- compositional art, which resisted all the traditional forms of anthropomorphism. What you are seeing are three almost black canvases by Rhinehart. These he called abstract paintings. For him, they were the last word. And in part, he described them [00:04:00] thus: a square, neutral, shapeless canvas, trisected, no composition, formless, no top, no bottom, directionless, brushwork brushed out, a mat flat, free-hand painted surface, glossless, textureless, nonlinear, non-hard edge, no soft edge. A pure, abstract, unobjective, timeless, spaceless, changeless, relationless, disinterested painting. In a sense, this work by Tony Smith, called Die of 1965, is only the most obvious manifestation of everything that Ad Reinhardt was trying to get across. The word “die,” which, among other things, connotes the death of something, expresses readily a kind of romantic nihilism, which is shared by some of the more alert object sculptures. And for which Ad Reinhardt was not a little responsible. But also, the square-sided Die [00:05:00] Transcript © 2018 The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation (SRGF). All rights reserved. Page 1 of 16 Guggenheim Museum Archives Reel-to-Reel collection “Post Object Sculpture” with Jack Burnham, 1967 implies the incredible precisionism found within the tool patterns of the machinist’s workbench. The roots of this nihilism is to be found somewhat in an obvious cause. This is the technological imperative, the urge never to mark time by standing still. It can be derived from this painting, which is very nearly a non-painting by Frank Stella. That’s the object in back of the shape, which you see, the [dura vera?] sculpture. It is the nature of categories of objects, when they are subjected to the focus of modern inventive techniques, to pass into the realm of other categories. The psychological root cause for this in a sense of anxiety within the artist himself. In an interview a year or so ago, Frank Stella made these revealing remarks. Stella: [00:06:00] “I don’t want to make variations. I don’t want to record a path. I wanted to get the paint out of the can and on the canvas. I tried to keep the paint as good as it was in the can.” And Bruce [Glazer?] asked him, “Are you implying that you’re trying to destroy painting?” And Stella said, “It’s just that you can’t go back. It’s not a question of destroying anything. If something is used up, something’s done, something’s over with, what’s the point in getting involved in it?” On your right, you see a piece by Henry Moore called Locking Piece of a few years ago. It stands against the background of the Bank Lambert in Brussels, as a kind of homage to a now-almost defunct [00:07:00] sensibility. This was the intimation that a piece of sculpture could, at least metaphorically, embody life. Certainly the near bone-like projections, the polished and pitted surfaces of this work, are meant to express just that. The vitalistic tenor of this work expresses an intimate, if not introspective, rapport between the artist and his materials. While this remains for Moore the personification of truth to material, the very practical hollowness of the pieces is hardly apparent. That’s why the many modern techniques of fabrication and advertising, which finally move this work in front of the Bank Lambert. On the other side, you see a work by Gabo, this construction in space. And it would be good if it got a little bit sharper than it is. But maybe it’s just a little imprecise. In a sense, the name of Gabo, the [00:08:00] creator of this construction, and Henry Moore, these two names have been linked by Herbert Read in a particular way as representing a very distinct polarity in sculptural sensibilities. These are, in the case of Moore, organic, life-embodying, semi- closed forms, at times quite monolithic. And Gabo, whose ethereal, open, semi-geometric constructions embody pure intellectual conceptualization. The differences between these two types of work have long been noted. But I suspect, in the years to come, perhaps even less than 25, the approaches of these two men will have more in common and seem more the result of a single cultural attitude than they do at the present time. I know that in the middle ’50s, I had some chances to visit Gabo. And on one of these visits, I was struck by a certain contradiction, which [00:09:00] has only been noted by critics in the last few years. I saw Gabo making patterns for his constructions, cutting these parts out on a band saw, then meticulously filing and sanding the results. Gabo undoubtedly is a craftsman, and this is precisely the situation which seemed contradictory to me. Here is a man, anywhere from five to 50 years ago. For practically anybody in the arts, he embodied a sculptor who was dedicated to the age of technology, of industrialism, of scientific research, of scientific idealization. But at the same time, he was using techniques that would have not seemed out of place in the shop of a metalsmith or a fine watchmaker in the eighteenth century. Transcript © 2018 The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation (SRGF). All rights reserved. Page 2 of 16 Guggenheim Museum Archives Reel-to-Reel collection “Post Object Sculpture” with Jack Burnham, 1967 This is certainly not meant as a slight to Gabo, certainly not that. But it does point out, in the first half of this [00:10:00] century of modern sculpture, the division between the techniques of industrial fabrication and the techniques used by those artists caught up in the ethos of [techniks?]. What seems amazing today is that a few years ago, constructivism represented the epitome of industrialization and technology, as it is applied to the scientific ideal. What we have on the right here is a pile-on sign. This is what you call a [double-faced?] plastic, internally illuminated sign, illuminated by a bank of fluorescent tubes. And of course, it’s mounted on this single Lally column. Over this is posed an arrow of programmed incandescent lights, which you can see silhouetted against [00:11:00] the sky. The programmer for this little arrow here is what is known in the sign trade as a flasher. From this basic double-faced Coca-Cola sign, any number of auxiliary signs or [encrustations?] or what you’d like to call them can be hung and are hung. This technique of hanging sign from sign is about 30 years old and has been used with great originality in the past 10 years. In the 1950s, when I first worked on neon signs, it was with a profound sense of spatial shock that I opened one of them for the first time and found the hollow inside.
Recommended publications
  • Cubism in America
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sheldon Museum of Art Catalogues and Publications Sheldon Museum of Art 1985 Cubism in America Donald Bartlett Doe Sheldon Memorial Art Gallery Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sheldonpubs Part of the Art and Design Commons Doe, Donald Bartlett, "Cubism in America" (1985). Sheldon Museum of Art Catalogues and Publications. 19. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sheldonpubs/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sheldon Museum of Art at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sheldon Museum of Art Catalogues and Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. RESOURCE SERIES CUBISM IN SHELDON MEMORIAL ART GALLERY AMERICA Resource/Reservoir is part of Sheldon's on-going Resource Exhibition Series. Resource/Reservoir explores various aspects of the Gallery's permanent collection. The Resource Series is supported in part by grants from the National Endowment for the Arts. A portion of the Gallery's general operating funds for this fiscal year has been provided through a grant from the Institute of Museum Services, a federal agency that offers general operating support to the nation's museums. Henry Fitch Taylor Cubis t Still Life, c. 19 14, oil on canvas Cubism in America .".. As a style, Cubism constitutes the single effort which began in 1907. Their develop­ most important revolution in the history of ment of what came to be called Cubism­ art since the second and third decades of by a hostile critic who took the word from a the 15th century and the beginnings of the skeptical Matisse-can, in very reduced Renaissance.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism 1 Modernism
    Modernism 1 Modernism Modernism, in its broadest definition, is modern thought, character, or practice. More specifically, the term describes the modernist movement, its set of cultural tendencies and array of associated cultural movements, originally arising from wide-scale and far-reaching changes to Western society in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Modernism was a revolt against the conservative values of realism.[2] [3] [4] Arguably the most paradigmatic motive of modernism is the rejection of tradition and its reprise, incorporation, rewriting, recapitulation, revision and parody in new forms.[5] [6] [7] Modernism rejected the lingering certainty of Enlightenment thinking and also rejected the existence of a compassionate, all-powerful Creator God.[8] [9] In general, the term modernism encompasses the activities and output of those who felt the "traditional" forms of art, architecture, literature, religious faith, social organization and daily life were becoming outdated in the new economic, social, and political conditions of an Hans Hofmann, "The Gate", 1959–1960, emerging fully industrialized world. The poet Ezra Pound's 1934 collection: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum. injunction to "Make it new!" was paradigmatic of the movement's Hofmann was renowned not only as an artist but approach towards the obsolete. Another paradigmatic exhortation was also as a teacher of art, and a modernist theorist articulated by philosopher and composer Theodor Adorno, who, in the both in his native Germany and later in the U.S. During the 1930s in New York and California he 1940s, challenged conventional surface coherence and appearance of introduced modernism and modernist theories to [10] harmony typical of the rationality of Enlightenment thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • MSA 7 Program (Draft 10.17)
    MSA 7 Program (Draft 10.17) Session A: Thursday, 3:00–5:00 pm Panel 1. Manuscript Research and Modernist Studies Newberry Library, 60 W. Walton St. Bus transportation between the Newberry Library and the conference hotel is available ORGANIZER AND CHAIR: John Timberman Newcomb, University of Illinois – Urbana-Champaign George Bornstein, University of Michigan Laura Milsk Fowler, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Lawrence Rainey, University of York Seminars 2. Modernism at Home Chicago Ballroom A—No auditors, please ORGANIZER: Gail McDonald, University of North Carolina – Greensboro Dawn Blizard, Brown University Allison Carey, Cannon School Dorothy Chansky, Texas Tech University Bradley Clissold, Memorial University of Newfoundland Barbara Green, University of Notre Dame Kevin Hagopian, Pennsylvania State University Amy E. C. Linneman, Indiana University Marion McInnes, DePauw University Phoebe Putnam, Harvard University Jin Xiaotian Skye, University of Hong Kong Eve Sorum, University of Michigan 3. The Author Business Chicago Ballroom B—No auditors, please ORGANIZER: Alison Booth, University of Virginia Patrick Collier, Ball State University Marianne Cotugno, Miami University Maria Fackler, Yale University Julia Friedman, Brown University Peter Kalliney, University of South Florida Kurt M. Koenigsberger, Case Western Reserve University Bette London, University of Rochester Randi Saloman, Yale University Lisa Stein, Ohio University Catherine Turner, College Misericordia Andrea Zemgulys, University of Michigan 4. Anthropological
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Performance a Critical Anthology
    THE ART OF PERFORMANCE A CRITICAL ANTHOLOGY edited by GREGORY BATTCOCK AND ROBERT NICKAS /ubu editions 2010 The Art of Performance A Critical Anthology 1984 Edited By: Gregory Battcock and Robert Nickas /ubueditions ubu.com/ubu This UbuWeb Edition edited by Lucia della Paolera 2010 2 The original edition was published by E.P. DUTTON, INC. NEW YORK For G. B. Copyright @ 1984 by the Estate of Gregory Battcock and Robert Nickas All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for inclusion in a magazine, newspaper or broadcast. Published in the United States by E. P. Dutton, Inc., 2 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10016 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 79-53323 ISBN: 0-525-48039-0 Published simultaneously in Canada by Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Toronto 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 First Edition Vito Acconci: "Notebook: On Activity and Performance." Reprinted from Art and Artists 6, no. 2 (May l97l), pp. 68-69, by permission of Art and Artists and the author. Russell Baker: "Observer: Seated One Day At the Cello." Reprinted from The New York Times, May 14, 1967, p. lOE, by permission of The New York Times. Copyright @ 1967 by The New York Times Company.
    [Show full text]
  • Pressionism,Which Was Haven't Lookedat in a Long Time," Stillgoing Strongafter Maciejunessaid "It's Interestingto See World Wari
    + aynm Feran "Precisionism in DispatchEntertainment Reporter America■ 1915-1941: ReorderingReality" N 1915, ARTISTMARcEL DUCHAMP will openSunday proclaimedthe UnitedStates and continue "thecountry of theart of the throughJuly 4 at future." the Columbus "Look atthe skyscrapers!"he Museum of Art, said"Has Europe anything to 480 E. BroadSt. show more beautifulthan these?" Tourswill begiven The Frenchman's words at noonMay 26 and focusedattention on what was June 16, and 2 p.m. e seen as auniquely American artistic May 28and June movement. 18. Call 221-6801. "Precisionismin America1915-1941: ReorderingReality" is "thefirst major study of precisionismin a long time,"said NannetteMaciejunes, seniorcurator at the ColumbusMuseum of Art. "Precisionismis verytied up withthe search for a ABoVE:The cleanlines of rural unique Americanidentity," scenes: Bucks OHmJy Barn(1918) t she said"It wasabout the " by Charles Sheeler(1883-1965) tyingof a ruralpast to the mechanicalfuture. A lot of LEFT:The forms of the machine • people in the'.20s called it agewith classicalclarity: A.ugussin 'thetrue American art.' " andNu:oletle (1923)by Charles By the timeprecisionism Demuth (1883-1935) arrived,the United States waswell on itsway froma - ruralsociety to a nationof show,which began at theMontclair Art 0 big citieswith skyscrapers Museumin New Jerseyand features andhomes withmodern works by 26 artistsfrom almost 30 I marvelssuch asvacuum institutionsand private collections. cleanersand washing "Thisshow is so criticalto us," � �es. Maciejunes said"(Ferdinand) Rowald !'!. Painters and was majora collector in thisarea. He saw photographersassociated theparallel between cubism and �� withprecisionism included precisionism, andhe collected both." iii CharlesDemuth, Morton Althoughmany works in theNew I Scharnberg,Charles Sheeler Jerseyexhibition are not availablefor the s andJoseph Stella.
    [Show full text]
  • Knife Grinder Date: 1912-1913 Creator: Umberto Boccioni, Italian, 1882-1916 Title: Dynamism of a Soccer Player Work Type: Painting Date: 1913 Cubo-Futurism
    Creator: Malevich, Kazimir, Russian, 1878- 1935 Title: Knife Grinder Date: 1912-1913 Creator: Umberto Boccioni, Italian, 1882-1916 Title: Dynamism of a Soccer Player Work Type: Painting Date: 1913 Cubo-Futurism • A common theme I have been seeing in the different Cubo- Futurism Paintings is a wide variety of color and either solid formations or a high amount of single colors blended or layered without losing the original color. I sense of movement is also very big, the Knife Grinder shows the action of grinding by a repeated image of the hand, knife, or foot on paddle to show each moment of movement. The solid shapes and designs tho individually may not seem relevant to a human figure all come together to show the act of sharpening a knife. I Love this piece because of the strong colors and repeated imagery to show the act. • In the Dynamism of a soccer player the sense of movement is sort of around and into the center, I can imagine a great play of lights and crystal clarity of the ideas of the objects moving. I almost feel like this is showing not just one moment or one movement but perhaps an entire soccer game in the scope of the 2D canvas. Creator: Demuth, Charles, 1883-1935 Title: Aucassin and Nicolette Date: 1921 Creator: Charles Demuth Title: My Egypt Work Type: Paintings Date: 1927 Precisionism • Precisionism is the idea of making an artwork of another “artwork” as in a piece of architecture , or machinery. The artist renders the structure using very geometric and precise lines and they tend to keep an element of realism in their work.
    [Show full text]
  • Harn Museum of Art Instructional Resource: Thinking About Modernity
    Harn Museum of Art Instructional Resource: Thinking about Modernity TABLE OF CONTENTS “Give Me A Wilderness or A City”: George Bellows’s Rural Life ................................................ 2 Francis Criss: Locating Monuments, Locating Modernity ............................................................ 6 Seeing Beyond: Approaches to Teaching Salvador Dalí’s Appollinaire ............................. 10 “On the Margins of Written Poetry”: Pedro Figari ......................................................................... 14 Childe Hassam: American Impressionist and Preserver of Nature ..................................... 18 Subtlety of Line: Palmer Hayden’s Quiet Activism ........................................................................ 22 Modernist Erotica: André Kertész’s Distortion #128 ................................................................... 26 Helen Levitt: In the New York City Streets ......................................................................................... 31 Happening Hats: Pierre-Auguste Renoir’s Le chapeau épinglé .............................................. 35 Diego Rivera: The People’s Painter ......................................................................................................... 39 Diego Rivera: El Pintor del Pueblo ........................................................................................................... 45 Household Modernism, Domestic Arts: Tiffany’s Eighteen-Light Pond Lily Lamp .... 51 Marguerite Zorach: Modernism’s Tense Vistas ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Art History 1
    Art History 1 ART HISTORY Professors Farès El-Dahdah Contact Information Joseph Manca Art History Associate Professors https://arthistory.rice.edu/ Graham Bader 103 Herring Hall Leo Costello 713-348-4276 Gordon Hughes Graham Bader Fabiola López-Durán Department Chair Lida Oukaderova [email protected] Assistant Professors Sophie Crawford-Brown The Department of Art History offers a wide range of courses in Farshid Emami European, American, Latin American, Middle Eastern/Islamic, African/ Olivia Young African diaspora and Asian art history. The major in Art History is For Rice University degree-granting programs: structured to expose students to the chronological, geographical, and To view the list of official course offerings, please see Rice’s methodological breadth of the field of scholarship. Students in the Course Catalog (https://courses.rice.edu/admweb/!SWKSCAT.cat? program may pursue the BA degree with a major in Art History. The p_action=cata) department also offers a minor in Art History. To view the most recent semester’s course schedule, please see Rice's Bachelor's Program Course Schedule (https://courses.rice.edu/admweb/!SWKSCAT.cat) • Bachelor of Arts (BA) Degree with a Major in Art History (https:// Art History (HART) ga.rice.edu/programs-study/departments-programs/humanities/art- HART 100 - AP/OTH CREDIT IN ART HISTORY history/art-history-ba/) Short Title: AP/OTH CREDIT IN ART HISTORY Department: Art History Minor Grade Mode: Standard Letter Course Type: Transfer • Minor in Cinema and Media Studies (https://ga.rice.edu/programs- Credit Hours: 3 study/departments-programs/humanities/cinema-media-studies/ Restrictions: Enrollment is limited to Undergraduate, Undergraduate cinema-media-studies-minor/) Professional or Visiting Undergraduate level students.
    [Show full text]
  • F Or the Fiscal Year Ending June 3 0 , 2 0 18
    FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2018 annual report The Year in Summary As the largest public arts institution in Northern California, the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, comprising the de Young and the Legion of Honor, pursue the mission of serving a broad de Young and diverse constituency with exhibitions and programs that 50 Hagiwara Tea Garden Drive San Francisco, CA 94118 inform, educate, inspire, and entertain. In the past year, the deyoungmuseum.org Museums’ staff actively worked to achieve this mission with the dedicated support of members, donors, corporate and foundation Legion of Honor partners, trustees, city leaders, and the community at large. 100 34th Avenue One primary strategy in fulfilling the Museums’ purpose is in San Francisco, CA 94121 legionofhonor.org strengthening the permanent collection, then drawing from these rich resources to organize extraordinary exhibitions. Between 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2017–2018 “He never stopped making paintings and sculpture, generally at a scale one might call, at the very least, ambitious. Now San Francisco’s Legion of Honor has provided a space that matches in size the artist’s aspiration.” —San Francisco Chronicle \ on Julian Schnabel: Symbols of Actual Life “A lavish romp through the Rococo.” —Wall Street Journal \ on Casanova: The Seduction of Europe “A groundbreaking show like this may not appear again in July 2017 and June 2018, the Museums organized nearly thirty North America soon.” special exhibitions and installations. At the de Young, these — Fine Art Connoisseur \ included Teotihuacan: City of Water, City of Fire, the result of a on Truth and Beauty: long-term collaboration with cultural partners in Mexico, which The Pre-Raphaelites and presented examples from the Museums’ outstanding holdings the Old Masters of Teotihuacan murals—the largest and most important such collection outside Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Line Between the Happening and Daily Life Should Be Kept As Fluid, and Perhaps Indistinct, As Possible."
    "The line between the Happening and daily life should be kept as fluid, and perhaps indistinct, as possible." Synopsis What began as a challenge to the category of "art" initiated by the Futurists and Dadaists in the 1910s and 1920s came to fruition with the performance art movements, one branch of which was referred to as Happenings. Happenings involved more than the detached observation of the viewer; the artist engaged with Happenings required the viewer to actively participate in each piece. There was not a definite or consistent style for Happenings, as they greatly varied in size and intricacy. However, all artists staging Happenings operated with the fundamental belief that art could be brought into the realm of everyday life. This turn toward performance was a reaction against the long- standing dominance of the technical aesthetics of Abstract Expressionism and was a new art form that grew out of the social changes occurring in the 1950s and 1960s. © The Art Story Foundation – All rights Reserved For more movements, artists and ideas on Modern Art visit www.TheArtStory.org Key Ideas A main component of Happenings was the involvement of the viewer. Each instance a Happening occurred the viewer was used to add in an element of chance so, every time a piece was performed or exhibited it would never be the same as the previous time. Unlike preceding works of art which were, by definition, static, Happenings could evolve and provide a unique encounter for each individual who partook of the experience. The concept of the ephemeral was important to Happenings, as the performance was a temporary experience, and, as such could not be exhibited in a museum in the traditional sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Sylvia Whitman on the Cover of Harper’S Bazaar, October 1962
    ROBERT RAUSCHENBERG ORAL HISTORY PROJECT The Reminiscences of Sylvia Palacios Whitman Columbia Center for Oral History Research Columbia University 2015 PREFACE The following oral history is the result of a recorded interview with Sylvia Palacios Whitman conducted by Alessandra Nicifero on June 5, 2015. This interview is part of the Robert Rauschenberg Oral History Project. The reader is asked to bear in mind that s/he is reading a transcript of the spoken word, rather than written prose. Transcription: Audio Transcription Center Session #1 Interviewee: Sylvia Palacios Whitman Location: New York, New York Interviewer: Alessandra Nicifero Date: June 5, 2015 Q: I’m Alessandra Nicifero. I’m here with Sylvia Palacios Whitman and it’s June 5, 2015. Thank you for agreeing to be interviewed for the Robert Rauschenberg Oral History Project. I would like to start by talking a little bit about where you were born, where you grew up. Palacios Whitman: Yes. I was born in the south of Chile in a town called Osorno, which is quite south—as south as you can get pretty much in South America. I went to school there and my parents lived there all their lives and most of my family is still there. Q: Still your parents? Palacios Whitman: No, they died. I used to go a lot more to visit when my parents were alive but now that they’re not there anymore, it’s a little bit harder. But I still have my sister and her children and my nephews and nieces. I’m very close to all of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Whitman 61
    ROBERT WHITMAN 61 ROBERT ROBERT WHITMAN 61 ROBERT WHITMAN 61 October 26 – December 21, 2018 510 West 25th Street, New York 5 Robert Whitman: Theater of Images Adam Harrison Levy If you expect Robert Whitman to talk about his directions, Kaprow opened a door for Whitman. art, forget it. He’d rather discuss the Masi lugs “You didn’t have to be concerned about these things on the frames of a racing bike, the role of clowns lasting forever,” Whitman recalls. “You could be in Fellini films, or his local hardware store. “Too sloppy, and you could make work that decayed and much thinking,” he says, as we pull into the park- fell apart.” In the late ’50s, he would sometimes ing lot in front of Joann, the local craft store near leave drawings on his garage floor for a few weeks Warwick, New York, where he lives. “I’m a great so that tire marks and oil drippings would add to believer in instinct.” their composition. In Untitled (Checkerboard) (1957; p. 42), he used Scotch tape and aluminum I had asked him about the role of impermanence foil, everyday materials that are fragile and transi- in the work of Allan Kaprow, Claes Oldenburg, and tory. Some sixty years later, the tape is brittle and Jim Dine, fellow artists who had also played pivotal the foil has lost some of its luster. roles in the downtown art scene of New York in the Robert Rauschenberg and Robert Whitman at the The Menil Collection, 10th Anniversary celebration, Houston, 1997 late 1950s and early ’60s.
    [Show full text]