Class Xii Biology Unit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Class Xii Biology Unit CLASS XII BIOLOGY UNIT – VII: GENETICS AND EVOLUTION CHAPTER 7 Evolution : Theories and Evidences Syllabus Origin of Life; Evolution of Life Forms-A Theory; What are the Evidences for Evolution ? What is Adaptive Radiation ? Biological Evolution, Mechanism of Evolution; Hardy-Weinberg Principle; A brief account of Evolution; Origin and Evolution of Man Introduction A number of changes in flora and fauna have occurred over millions of years on earth. The study of the history of life form on earth is Evolutionary Biology. This chapter deals with origin of life and evolution of life forms of biodiversity on the planet earth, evidences of evolution, mechanism of evolution, Hardy Weinberg principle and human evolution. The theory of evolution maintains that the different kinds of organisms that we see today have evolved from common ancestors over millions of years. This theory is one of the most important concepts in biology. The distinguished scientist Theodosius Dobzhansky has said : “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution”. For more than a century, the theory of evolution has exerted a very strong influence on our thinking about biology, also on developments in other disciplines such as sociology, politics, economics and religion. Life originated on the earth between 3000 and 4000 millon years ago, in the form the unicellular organisms. How did these simple cells lead to (or evolve into) organisms as large as a whale or a Sequoia (redwood) tree, and structures as complex and delicate as the eye and the brain? The “Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection”, was put forward by Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace towards the middle of the nineteenth century. It has provided us with a scientific framework for understanding the evolutionary changes that have occurred, and continue to take place in the biological world. 1. Basic unit of evolution is population. 2. Evolution is a slow, continuous and irreversible process of changes. 3. Earth is about 4.6 billion years old, and the oldest rocks that have persisted in recognizable form are about 3.8 billon years old. For many years, scientists believed that such ancient rocks did not contain any fossils, but they knew that fossils were simply too small to be seen clearly without an electron microscope. 4. The oldest microfossils discovered so far are that appeared 3.3 to 3.5 billion years ago. 5. Massive limestone deposits called Stromatolites became frequent in the fossil record about 2.8 billion years ago. Produced by cyan bacteria, stromatolites were abundant in virtually all freshwater and marine communities until about 1.6 billion years ago. 6. The fossil records indicates that unicellular protists – the first eukaryotes - appeared about 1.5 billion years ago. 7. Origin of Earth : The Big Bang Theory proposes that the universe had an explosive beginning. The universe originated about 20 billion years ago by a big bang (thermonuclear explosion) of a dense entity. About 4.5 billion years ago, our solar system was probably created when the gaseous cloud called Solar Nebula started to collapse under 1 the force of its own gravity, until it became a flattened spinning disc of atoms and particles. Its central region heated up and became a star. According to recent literature the first non-cellular forms of life could have originated3 billion years back. They would have been giant molecules (RNA, protein, polysaccharides etc.) These capsules reproduced their molecules perhaps. The first cellular form of life did not possibly originate till about 2000 million years ago. THERIES ON THE ORIGIN OF LIFE 1. Theory of special creation states that life was created by supernatural power in the form which has not undergone any change. It was given by Father Saurez. God has created life in six days from meteria prima and man was created by him on sixth day. According to this theory earth is about 4000 years old. 2. Theory of catastrophism was given by Cuvier, according to which after a gap of certain period (called age), the world undergoes a catastrophe (sudden calamity) to kill almost all the living organisms and then God created new generation or new life from inorganic matter. 3. Theory of biogenesis (i.e. life from life, Omnis vivum ex. vivo) was proved by Redi, Spallanzani and Pasteur independently. They disproved (refuted) theory of spontaneous generation (abiogenesis). Francesco Redi (1668) proved that files could not arisa from putrefying meat without their eggs. Spallanzani (1767) demonstrated that putrefaction of meat is due to microbes in the air it can be prevented by boiling and sealing the meat in air tight containers. Pasteur gave a definite proof of life arising from pre-existing life using microbes and sterilization methods. 4. Cosmozoic theory (Theory of panspermia) given by Richter (1865) , Helmholtz (1884), Arrhenius (1908) suggested that life reached the earth from some heavenly body through meteorites. Panspermia (primitive form of life, as suggested by Arrhenius, 1908) consisted of spores or seeds (sperms) and microbes that existed throughout universe and produced different forms of life on this earth. Abiogenic or Chemical Origin of Life Majority of the scientists are of the opinion that life originated from inanimate matter. Since the theory of abiogenic origin or chemical evolution of life is the only one that provides an explanation, which can be tested, most scientists have tentatively accepted it. Oparin-Haldane Hypothesis 1. Alexander 1. Oparin (1894-1980), a Russion biochemist , and J.B.S.H aldane (1892-1964), a British scientist put forward the concept that first organism evolved from non-living material. They also suggested that the sequence of events that might have occurred. In 1923, Oparin postulated that life originated on Earth at some point of time in the remote past, and under the conditions no longer observed. In his book, The Origin of Life (1938), Oparin submitted abiogenesis first, but biogenesis ever since. Oparin’s theory is know as primary abiogenesis. 2. According Oparin and Haldane (1929), spontaneous generation of early molecules might have taken place if the earth once had more reducing atmosphere compared to the present oxidising atmosphere . Oparin and Haldane agreed that the primeval Earth contained little, if at all, oxygen. Perhaps, in the primitive atmosphere oxygen in the free gaseous states was virtually absent. Therefore, no degradation of any organic compound arising in the primeval Earth could have taken place. 2 3. As there was no azone layer in the atmosphere any absorption of UV radiation, that is lethal to our present lives was possible in the primordial Earth. 4. The early gas cloud was rich in hydrogen ,being present in the form of methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3) and water (H2O). 5. Moreover, that atmospheric water vapour condensed into drops of water as rain that rolled down the rock surfaces and accumulated to form liquid pools and oceans. In the process, erosion of rocks and washing of mineral (e.g., chlorides and phosphates) into the oceans were inevitable. Thus, Halane’s hot dilute soup was produced and the stage was set for combination of various chemical elements. 6. Atmospheric chemicals and those in water produced small precursor molecules,like amino acids, sugars, nitrogenous bases etc. These precursor molecules then combined resulting in the appearance of proteins. 7. The energy sources for such reactions of organic synthesis were the UV radiation (solar radiation), cosmic rays, electrical discharges (lighting), intense dry heat (volcanic eruption) and radioactive decay of various elements on the Earth’s surface. Once formed, the organic molecules accumulated in water because their degradation was extremely slow in the absence of any life or enzyme catalysts. Such transformation is not possible in the present oxidizing atmosphere because oxygen of micro organisms will decompose or destroy the living particle that may arise by mere chance. Experimental Evidence for Abiogenic Molecular Evolution of Life Haroid C.Urey (1893-1981), an astronomer, accorded the first adequate recognition of Oparin-Haldane’s vview on the oringin of life in 1952,. Urey asked his student Stanely L. Miller, a biochemist, to replicate the primordial atmosphere as propounded by Oparin and Haldane. Miller (1953) made the first successful simulation experiment to assess the validity of the claim for origin of organic molecules in the primeval Earth condition. 1. Miller sealed in a spark chamber a mixture of water (H2O), methane (CH4), ammonia (NH3) and hydrogen gas (H2). He made arrangement for insertion of two electrodes to provide electrical energy (simulation of lightning) to the spark chamber. CH4, NH3, H2 were in 2: 1: 2 ratio and water vapour at 800ͦ C. Electric spark of 75,000 volt was provided to the mixture. 2. The spark chamber was connected to another flask with arrangement for boiling water (provision for evaporation). The other end of the spark chamber was connected to a trap by a tube that passed through a condenser (an arrangement for condensation and collection of aqueous solution, equivalent to rain and Haldane’s soup). The trap, in turn, was connected with the flask for boiling water (arrangement for circulation). 3. The control apparatus contained every arrangement except that it was devoid of energy source. 4. After eighteen days, significant amount of the simple organic compounds (monomers), such as amino acids and peptide chains, began to appear in the aqueous sample of the experimental set. Amino acids found were alanine, glycine and aspartic acid. Therefore, the obvious inference was that biotic synthesis of organic monomers occurred in the simulated experimental condition. By analogy, such synthesis could have occurred in the primitive atmospheric condition. Later on many scientists repeated Miller’s experiment using slightly different starting materials and UV radiation of other energy sources.
Recommended publications
  • BZYCT-138 Cover Page English—Volume 1
    Unit 14 Evolutionary Change, Species Concept and Speciation-I UNIT 14 EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE, SPECIES CONCEPT AND SPECIATIONSPECIATIONIIII Structure 14.1 Introduction Evolutionary Species Objectives Biological Species 14.2 Importance of Species Ring Species Concept Genetic Similarity and Bar 14.3 Defining Species: A Major Code Species Problem 14.4 Mode of Speciation Nominalistic Species Artificial Speciation Typological/Morphological/ Sympatric Speciation Essentialistic Species Allopatric Speciation Phenetic Species Isolating Mechanisms Recognition Species 14.5 Summary Cohesion Species 14.6 Terminal Questions Phylogenetic Species 14.7 Answers Ecological Species Genetic Species Genic Species 14.1 INTRODUCTION In the present unit you will deal with the concept of species and speciation together with its mechanisms. In the previous unit you have studied the process of evolutionary changes that have led to genetic repatterning during isolation and caused premating and postmating isolation and genetic drift as well. A species is defined as a group of similar individuals that are interbreeding in nature. The species is the principal natural taxonomic unit, 127 Block 4 Speciation and Species Extinction ranking below a genus and denoted by a Latin binomial nomenclature e.g. Homo sapiens . Where Homo is genus and sapiens represents species (Fig. 14.1). In biological science species is a smallest independently dynamic evolving basic unit of biological classification and a taxonomic rank. A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which two individuals can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction. Fig. 14.1: Diversified species are reproductively isolated. Objectives After having read this unit you should be able to: define various species concepts, their merits and demerits, explain biological species concept-most acceptable species concept, and discuss mechanism of speciation.
    [Show full text]
  • YSF 2020-PROGRAMME-1.Pdf
    YOUNG SYSTEMATISTS' FORUM Day 1 Monday 23rd November 2020, Zoom [all timings are GMT+0] 11.50 Opening remarks David Williams, President of the Systematics Association 12.00 Rodrigo Vargas Pêgas Species Concepts and the Anagenetic Process Importance on Evolutionary History 12.15 Katherine Odanaka Insights into the phylogeny and biogeography of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Nomada 12.30 Minette Havenga Association among global populations of the Eucalyptus foliar pathogen Teratosphaeria destructans 12.45 David A. Velasquez-Trujillo Phylogenetic relationships of the whiptail lizards of the genus Holcosus COPE 1862 (Squamata: Teiidae) based on morphological and molecular evidence 13.00 Break 10 minutes 13.10 Arsham Nejad Kourki The Ediacaran Dickinsonia is a stem-eumetazoan 13.25 Flávia F.Petean The role of the American continent on the diversification of the stingrays’ genus Hypanus Rafinesque, 1818 (Myliobatiformes: Dasyatidae) 13.40 Peter M.Schächinger Discovering species diversity in Antarctic marine slugs (Mollusca: Gastropoda) 13.55 Alison Irwin Eight new mitogenomes clarify the phylogenetic relationships of Stromboidea within the gastropod phylogenetic framework 14.10 Break 20 minutes 14.30 Érica Martinha Silva de The lineages of foliage-roosting fruit bat Uroderma spp. (Chiroptera: Souza Phyllostomidae 14.45 Melissa Betters Rethinking Informative Traits: Environmental Influence on Shell Morphology in Deep-Sea Gastropods 15.00 J. Renato Morales-Mérida- New lineages of Holcosus undulatus (Squamata: Teiidae) in Guatemala 15.15 Roberto
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation of Mini-Antelope: Proceedings of an International Symposium and on Duiker and Dwarf Antelope in Africa
    SPECIES CONCEPTS AND THE REAL DIVERSITY OF ANTELOPES F. P. D. COTTERILL Principal Curator of Vertebrates, Department of Mammalogy, Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe, P. O. Box 240, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe 2003. In A. Plowman (Ed.). Ecology and Conservation of Mini-antelope: Proceedings of an International Symposium and on Duiker and Dwarf Antelope in Africa. Filander Verlag: Füürth. pp. 59-118. Biodiversity Foundation for Africa, Secretariat: P O Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe (Address for correspondence) email: [email protected] Abstract As for all biodiversity, society requires an accurate taxonomy of the Bovidae. We need to know what the different antelopes really are, and where these occur. Sound scientific, economic and aesthetic arguments underpin this rationale. This paper highlights some of the costs that result from the misconstrual of the real nature of species. Controversy reigns over which species concepts are most applicable to characterize biodiversity; a controversy magnified by how different species concepts create taxonomies of differing accuracy and precision. The contemporary taxonomy of the Mammalia continues to be based on the Biological Species Concept (BSC). Its deficiencies are too rarely acknowledged, and afflict apparently well known taxa of large mammals, notably the Bovidae. Errors in the BSC misconstrue natural patterns of diversity: recognizing too many (Type I errors), or too few species (Type II errors). Most insidious are Type III errors; where evolutionary relationships are misconstrued because the BSC cannot conceptualize, and thus ignores phylogenetic uniqueness. The general trend in current taxonomies of antelopes is to under represent true diversity - exemplified in the dikdiks (Type II errors). Misconstrual of phylogenetic relationships among species (Type III errors) appear rampant in these same taxonomies (the Cephalophini for example).
    [Show full text]
  • Programm Und Kurzfassungen – Program and Abstracts
    1 Zitteliana An International Journal of Palaeontology and Geobiology Series B/Reihe B Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie 29 Paläontologie im Blickpunkt 80. Jahrestagung der Paläontologischen Gesellschaft 5. – 8. Oktober 2010 in München Programm und Kurzfassungen – Program and Abstracts München 2010 Zitteliana B 29 118 Seiten München, 1.10.2010 ISSN 1612-4138 2 Editors-in-Chief/Herausgeber: Gert Wörheide, Michael Krings Mitherausgeberinnen dieses Bandes: Bettina Reichenbacher, Nora Dotzler Production and Layout/Bildbearbeitung und Layout: Martine Focke, Lydia Geissler Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie Editorial Board A. Altenbach, München B.J. Axsmith, Mobile, AL F.T. Fürsich, Erlangen K. Heißig, München H. Kerp, Münster J. Kriwet, Stuttgart J.H. Lipps, Berkeley, CA T. Litt, Bonn A. Nützel, München O.W.M. Rauhut, München B. Reichenbacher, München J.W. Schopf, Los Angeles, CA G. Schweigert, Stuttgart F. Steininger, Eggenburg Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie Richard-Wagner-Str. 10, D-80333 München, Deutschland http://www.palmuc.de email: [email protected] Für den Inhalt der Arbeiten sind die Autoren allein verantwortlich. Authors are solely responsible for the contents of their articles. Copyright © 2010 Bayerische Staassammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, München Die in der Zitteliana veröffentlichten Arbeiten sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Nachdruck, Vervielfältigungen auf photomechanischem, elektronischem oder anderem Wege sowie
    [Show full text]
  • A Simple Parsimony-Based Approach to Assess Ancestor-Descendant Relationships Damien Aubert
    A simple parsimony-based approach to assess ancestor-descendant relationships Damien Aubert To cite this version: Damien Aubert. A simple parsimony-based approach to assess ancestor-descendant relationships. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2017, 72 (2), pp.103-121. <https://ukrbotj.co.ua/archive/74/2/103>. <10.15407/ukr- botj74.02.103>. <hal-01568352> HAL Id: hal-01568352 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01568352 Submitted on 25 Jul 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Загальні проблеми, огляди та дискусії General Issues, Reviews and Discussions doi: 10.15407/ukrbotj74.02.103 A simple parsimony-based approach to assess ancestor-descendant relationships Damien AUBERT Académie de Clermont-Ferrand, Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale 3, avenue Vercingétorix 63033 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France [email protected] Aubert D. A simple parsimony-based approach to assess ancestor-descendant relationships. Ukr. Bot. J., 2017, 74(2): 103–121. Abstract. One of the main goals of systematics is to reconstruct the tree of life. Half a century ago, the breakthrough of cladistics was a major step towards this objective because it allowed us to assess relatedness patterns among species, an abstract kind of relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings V56 Suppl I Taxonomy 157-237.Qxp
    A Unified Concept of Species and Its Consequences for the Future of Taxonomy Kevin de Queiroz Reprinted from the Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, ser. 4, 56(Suppl. I) 3 June 2005 Reprinted from Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, ser. 4, 56(Suppl I) PROCEEDINGS OF THE CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Volume 56, Supplement I, No. 18, pp. 196-215, 3 figs, 1 table. June 3, 2005 A Unified Concept of Species and Its Consequences for tlie Future of Taxonomy Kevin de Queiroz Department of Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560, Email: [email protected] Contemporary species concepts are diverse. Nonetheless, all share the fundamental idea that species are segments of Uneages at the population level of biological organ- ization. They differ in the secondary properties (e.g., intrinsic reproductive isolation, monophyly, diagnosability) that are treated as necessary for considering lineages to be species. A unified species concept can be achieved by interpreting the common fundamental idea of being a separately evolving lineage segment as the only neces- sary property of species and viewing the various secondary properties either as lines of evidence relevant to assessing lineage separation or as properties that define dif- ferent subcategories of the species category (e.g., reproductively isolated species, monophyletic species, diagnosable species). This unified species concept has a num- ber of consequences for taxonomy, including the need to acknowledge that undiffer- entiated and undiagnosable lineages are species, that species can fuse, that species can be nested within other species, that the species category is not a taxonomic rank, and that new taxonomic practices and conventions are needed to accommodate these conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Parainfraclass Archosauria Cope, 1869, Excluding the Advanced Crocodylia
    ^ARThS SOEWCES USHAH1 A Revision of the Parainfraclass Archosauria Cope, 1869, Excluding the Advanced Crocodylia George Olshevsky Mesozoic Meanderings #2 Published by: George Olshevsky Publications Requiring Research Post Office Box 16924 San Diego, California 92176-6924 Price: $20.00 First printing (October 24, 19i>l): 100 copies, of which this is # /C / Signed by author: j>r £Vr Contents PREFACE 1 Parasuborder: Erythrosuchia Bonaparte, Acknowledgments 3 1982 40 Technical Review 4 Parafamily: Erythrosuchidae INTRODUCTION 5 Watson, 1917 40 Materials and Methods 6 Parasuborder Rauisuchia How To Use This List: Conventions 7 Bonaparte, 1982 41 TAXONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 13 Family: Rauisuchidae The Problems of Cladistic von Huene, 1942 41 Classifications 14 Rauisuchia incertae sedis 42 Linnaean Taxa at the Ordinal Level .. .19 Suborder Poposauria nov. 43 New Subfamilial Taxa 21 Family: Teratosauridae Cope, 1871 ... 43 ARCHOSAUR PHYLOGENY 25 Pseudosuchia incertae sedis 44 Defining Archosaurs 26 Family: Ctenosauriscidae Early Archosaurs 28 Kuhn, 1964 44 Thecodontian Orders 29 Family: Teleocrateridae Romer, 1966 .. 44 Superorder: THECODONTU Owen, 1859 . 31 Order: PARASUCHIA Huxley, 1875 44 Paraorder: PROTEROSUCHIA Family: Parasuchidae Lydekker, 1885 .44 Broom, 1906 37 Order: AETOSAURIA Family: Mesenosauridae Nicholson & Lydekker, 1889 49 Romer, 1956 37 Family: Stagonolepididae Family: Proterosuchidae Lydekker, July 1887 49 von Huene, 1914 37 Aetosauria incertae sedis 50 Proterosuchia incertae sedis 38 Order: CROCODYLIA Gmelin, 1788 .... 50 Order: ORNITHOSUCHIA Suborder Trialestia Crush, 1984 51 Bonaparte, 1971 38 Family: Trialestidae Bonaparte, 1982 .. 51 Parafamily: Euparkeriidae Suborder: Sphenosuchia von Huene, 1920 38 Bonaparte, 1971 51 Family: Erpetosuchidae Family: Pedeticosauridae Watson, 1917 38 van Hoepen, 1915 51 Family: Ornithosuchidae Family: Hemiprotosuchidae von Huene, 1908 38 Crush, 1984 51 Order: PSEUDOSUCHIA Family: Sphenosuchidae Zittel, 1887-90 39 von Huene, 1922 51 Suborder: Arcfaaeosuchia SilL 1967 39 Family: Lewisuchidae nov.
    [Show full text]
  • GENETICS, TAXONOM B. Sc. I YEAR NETICS, TAXONOMY & EVOLUTIO EVOLUTION
    BSC ZO- 103 B. Sc. I YEAR GENETICS, TAXONOMY & EVOLUTION DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Board of Studies and Programme Coordinator Board of Studies Prof. B.D.Joshi Prof. H.C.S.Bisht Retd.Prof. Department of Zoology Department of Zoology DSB Campus, Kumaun University, Gurukul Kangri University Nainital Haridwar Prof. H.C.Tiwari Dr.N.N.Pandey Retd. Prof. & Principal Principal Scientist, Department of Zoology, Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries MB Govt.PG College Research (ICAR) Haldwani Nainital. Bhimtal (Nainital). Dr. Shyam S.Kunjwal Department of Zoology School of Sciences, Uttarakhand Open University Programme Coordinator Dr. Shyam S.Kunjwal Department of Zoology School of Sciences, Uttarakhand Open University Haldwani, Nainital Unit writing and Editing Editor Writer Dr.S.N Bahuguna Dr.H.C.S.Bisht Professor & Head Professor Department of Zoology & Biotechnology Department of Zoology HNB Garhwal( A Central University) DSB Campus, Kumaun University, Nainital, P.B.No.70,Srinagar,Garhwal(246174) Uttarakhand (India). Dr.Dharmendra K.Rathor Assistant Professor Department of Zoology Govt. PG College Lohaghat (Uttarakhand) Course Title and Code : Genetics, Taxonomy & Evolution (BS CZO 103 ) ISBN : 978-93-85740-55-8 Copyright : Uttarakhand Open University Edition : 2017 Published By : Uttarakhand Open University, Haldwani, Nainital- 263139 ss BSCZO-103 Genetics, Taxonomy & Evolution DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY SCHOOL OF SCIENCES UTTARAKHAND OPEN UNIVERSITY Phone No. 05946-261122, 261123 Toll free No. 18001804025 Fax No. 05946-264232, E. mail [email protected] htpp://uou.ac.in Contents Course 3: Genetics, Taxonomy & Evolution Course code: BSCZO103 Credit: 3 Unit Block and Unit title Page number number Block 1 Genetics 1-91 1 Mendalism and Elements of heredity : Elements of heredity and variation, 1-31 Mendel’s principles of heredity, linkage (Coupling and repulsion), crossing-over (mechanism, theories and importance).
    [Show full text]
  • Entomological Enigmas and New Approach in Insect Morphology 9.00 Ernst A
    Systematics 2008, Göttingen 8:30 – 12:00 Room 010 Opening and Plenary Session I Progress in deep phylogeny 13:30–15:00 15:30–16:30 Session 1 Session 4 Room 009 Insect phylogeny Phylogenomics of lower Metazoa Session 2 Session 5 Room 008 Plant phylogeny I Plant phylogeny II Session 3 Session 6 Tuesday, 8 April Room 007 Speciation Reticulate evolution I Session 7 Room 006 Taxonomy and classification 8:30 – 12:00 Room 010 Plenary session II Speciation and phylogeography 13:30–15:00 15:30–16:30 Session 8 Session 12 Room 009 Animal phylogeny and Animal classification phylogeography Session 9 Session 13 Room 008 Plant Plant phylogeography I phylogeography II Session 10 Session 14 Wednesday, 9 April Room 007 Radiation Reticulate evolution II Session 11 Session 15 Room 006 Taxonomy Palaeontology and barcoding 8:30 – 12:00 Room 010 Plenary session III New trends in biological systematics 13:30–15:00 15:30–17:00 Session 16 Session 19 Room 009 Biogeography Biogeography and evolution I and evolution II Session 17 Session 20 Room 008 Structure and Structure and evolution – animals evolution – plants Thursday, 10 April Session 18 Session 21 Room 007 Phylogeny of Molecular early land plants evolution Systematics 2008 Göttingen, Programme and Abstracts This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License 2.0 “by-nc-nd”, allowing you to download, distribute and print the document in a few copies for private or educational use, given that the document stays unchanged and the creator is mentioned. Commercial use is not covered by the licence.
    [Show full text]
  • The General Lineage Concept of Species, Species Criteria
    The General Lineage Concept of Species, Species Criteria, and the Process of Speciation A Conceptual Unification and Terminological Recommendations - Kevin de Queiroz Speciation, the process through which new species come by contemporary biologists. Next, I present evidence that into being, is one of the central topics of evolutionary all modem species definitions describe variants of a single biology. It links the great fields of micro- and macroevo- general concept of species. I then discuss how the time- lutionary biology and intersects a wide variety of related extended nature of species and the diversity of events that biological disciplines, including behavioral biology, ecol- occur during the process of speciation provide the basis ogy, genetics, morphology, paleontology, physiology, for the diversity of alternative species definitions. Based reproductive biology, and systematics. For this reason, a on a distinction between species concepts and species persistent controversy regarding the definition of the term criteria, I propose a revised and conceptually unified ter- species may seem disconcerting. The continual proposal minology for the ideas described by contemporary spe- of new species definitions-commonly characterized as cies definitions, and I discuss the significance and limi- alternative species concepts-seems to suggest that there tations of different classes of species definitions. Finally, is no general agreement about what species are, and if I examine an interpretation of species criteria that places this is the case, then the possibility of understanding how alternative criteria in direct conflict and thus contains the species come into being also seems unlikely. At the very key to resolving the species problem. least, there seems to be considerable potential for mis- interpretation and confusion about what different biolo- gists mean when they talk about species and speciation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/List/Vascular.Asp; Accessed Jan
    i PHYLOGENY, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF THE COSMOPOLITAN FLOWERING PLANT GENUS STELLARIA L. by MATHEW THOMAS SHARPLES B.A., University of Massachusetts, 2008 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology 2019 ii This dissertation entitled: Phylogeny, biogeography, and reproductive biology of the cosmopolitan flowering plant genus Stellaria L. written by Mathew Thomas Sharples has been approved for the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology ________________________________ Dr. Erin A. Tripp ________________________________ Dr. Jeffry Mitton ________________________________ Dr. Mitchell McGlaughlin ________________________________ Dr. Stacey D. Smith ________________________________ Dr. William Bowman Date 4 November 2019 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. iii Sharples, Mathew Thomas (Ph.D., Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) Phylogeny, biogeography, and reproductive biology of the cosmopolitan flowering plant genus Stellaria L. Dissertation directed by Associate Professor and COLO Herbarium Curator Dr. Erin A. Tripp The flowering plant genus Stellaria L. (Caryophyllaceae; the “starworts”) numbers around 112 species and exhibits a cosmopolitan distribution. To gain familiarity
    [Show full text]
  • A Simple Parsimony-Based Approach to Assess Ancestor-Descendant Relationships Damien Aubert
    A simple parsimony-based approach to assess ancestor-descendant relationships Damien Aubert To cite this version: Damien Aubert. A simple parsimony-based approach to assess ancestor-descendant relationships. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2017, 72 (2), pp.103-121. 10.15407/ukrbotj74.02.103. hal-01568352 HAL Id: hal-01568352 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01568352 Submitted on 25 Jul 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Загальні проблеми, огляди та дискусії General Issues, Reviews and Discussions doi: 10.15407/ukrbotj74.02.103 A simple parsimony-based approach to assess ancestor-descendant relationships Damien AUBERT Académie de Clermont-Ferrand, Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale 3, avenue Vercingétorix 63033 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France [email protected] Aubert D. A simple parsimony-based approach to assess ancestor-descendant relationships. Ukr. Bot. J., 2017, 74(2): 103–121. Abstract. One of the main goals of systematics is to reconstruct the tree of life. Half a century ago, the breakthrough of cladistics was a major step towards this objective because it allowed us to assess relatedness patterns among species, an abstract kind of relationship.
    [Show full text]