Temporal Variation of the Small Eukaryotic Community in Two Freshwater Lakes: Emphasis on Zoosporic Fungi
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Vol. 67: 91–105, 2012 AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Published online October 2 doi: 10.3354/ame01592 Aquat Microb Ecol OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS FEATURE ARTICLE Temporal variation of the small eukaryotic community in two freshwater lakes: emphasis on zoosporic fungi Emilie Lefèvre1,2,*, Peter M. Letcher1, Martha J. Powell1 1Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, USA 2Present address: Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27701, USA ABSTRACT: Applications of molecular approaches to the study of microbial eukaryotic communities in fresh- water lakes are transforming our understanding of these ecosystems. One of the most unexpected discov- eries is that zoosporic fungi significantly dominate the planktonic fungal diversity. Although zoosporic fungi are now recognized as an important component of aquatic microbial food webs, our knowledge of their community structure and temporal variability remains poor. The objectives of our study were (1) to compare and describe the contribution of zoosporic fungi to the eukaryotic diversity in 2 lakes differing in their trophic status during the mixing and the stratified seasons and (2) to phylogenetically identify the recovered zoosporic fungal sequences. The small eukaryotes (0.6 to 8 µm) of the euphotic zone of the oligotrophic Lake Tusca - The meso-eutrophic Lake Lurleen (top) and humic oligotro- loosa and meso-eutrophic Lake Lurleen (Alabama, phic Lake Tuscaloosa (bottom) harbor a high diversity of USA) were collected over 1 yr. Analyses of the 28S planktonic zoosporic fungi, such as the saprobe Rhizoclos- rDNA clone libraries showed that zoosporic fungi dom- matium aurantiacum (right: young sporangia in culture) and inated the small planktonic fungal community and the unidentified parasite (arrows) on the alga Straurastrum were more diverse in the meso-eutrophic lake and dur- rotula (left: individual in environmental sample). ing the thermal stratification. Although the overall Photos: MJ Powell, PM Letcher, E Lefèvre structure of the eukaryotic community was similar between the 2 lakes, at lower taxonomic levels, com- munity composition differed. Analyses of the retrieved fungal sequences revealed that zoosporic fungi mostly affiliated with Rhizophydiales and Chytridiales or INTRODUCTION formed environmental clades. Although the phyto- planktonic community was also monitored, zoosporic Recent applications of molecular approaches to fungal parasites were rarely observed on algae. These results provide new insights into the diversity and characterize eukaryotic communities have revealed seasonality of the zoosporic fungal community in lake that zoosporic fungi significantly contribute to the eu- ecosystems. karyotic diversity in a range of ecosystems, such as high-elevation soils (Freeman et al. 2009), deep-sea KEY WORDS: Zoosporic fungi · Molecular diversity · hydrothermal ecosystems (Le Calvez et al. 2009, Na- Temporal variation · Freshwater lakes · Plankton gahama et al. 2011), and streams (Nikolcheva & Bär- Resale or republication not permitted without locher 2004, Seena et al. 2008). In freshwater lakes, written consent of the publisher *Email: [email protected] © Inter-Research 2012 · www.int-res.com 92 Aquat Microb Ecol 67: 91–105, 2012 where fungi in general have rarely been factored in netic standpoint, to explore the diversity of fresh - as a component of the microbial food web (Wetzel water zoosporic fungi and accurately place the re - 2001, Sigee 2005), a high diversity of zoosporic fungal covered sequences within the zoosporic fungal sequences has been unexpectedly recovered in re - phylogeny. To address these objectives, an rDNA cent studies (Lefranc et al. 2005, Slapeta et al. 2005, environmental survey was conducted on the small Lefèvre et al. 2007, 2008, Lepère et al. 2008, Chen et planktonic fraction (0.6 to 8 µm). The small plank- al. 2008, Luo et al. 2011, Monchy et al. 2011). tonic fraction was selected in order to relate the The typical life cycle of a zoosporic fungus begins detected diversity to similar previous studies also with the attachment of a free-swimming uniflagellate conducted on the small fraction, which harbors a rel- zoospore to decaying or living organic substrates. atively high diversity of zoosporic fungi (Lefranc et The encysted zoospore develops into a mature thal- al. 2005, Lefèvre et al. 2007, 2008, Lepère et al. 2008) lus (sporangium typically with rhizoids) obtaining its (see Table 2). Because of the exploratory aspect of energy from the substrate. When the thallus reaches our study for undescribed zoosporic fungi, we chose maturity, the sporangium releases zoospores (typi- to use universal eukaryotic primers instead of more cally 3 to 8 µm diameter) into the environment (Fuller specific fungal primers designed from mostly terres- & Jaworski 1987, Powell 1993). Multiple roles for trial and non-zoosporic fungi (White et al. 1990, zoosporic fungi in lake ecosystems have been sug- Borneman & Hartin 2000). In addition, although the gested, including (1) parasites affecting phytoplank- main goal of the present study focused on the zoo - tonic successions and impacting primary production, sporic fungal community, the use of universal euka - (2) saprobes playing an important role in decomposi- ryotic primers provided an overview of the small tion of recalcitrant organic material such as chitin eukaryotic community, therefore giving us the and cellulose, and (3) prey, via the consumption of opportunity to place the recovered zoosporic fungal their zoospores by predators, transferring energy diversity in the context of the whole eukaryotic com- from primary producers and detritus to higher- munity. Finally, to address our second objective, we trophic-level organisms (reviewed by Gleason et al. chose to target the ribosomal large subunit (LSU, i.e. 2008). However, data supporting these assumptions 28S) gene, which has been shown to be more phylo- are relatively scarce (van Donk & Ringelberg 1983, genetically informative for zoosporic fungi than the Kagami & Urabe 2002, Kagami et al. 2004, 2007a, more conserved small subunit (SSU, i.e. 18S) gene or Rasconi et al. 2009), and consequently little is known the more variable ITS region (Letcher et al. 2008a, about the ecological importance and dynamics of b,c). In addition, to characterize the fungal parasitism zoosporic fungi in freshwater lakes. potentially associated with algae, the composition In contrast, phylogenetics has advanced in the past and dynamics of the phytoplanktonic community decade with an impressive amount of molecular and were microscopically determined. ultrastructural data assembled for zoosporic fungi sampled globally (Letcher & Powell 2005a,b, Letcher et al. 2005, 2006, 2008a,b, James et al. 2006a,b, MATERIALS AND METHODS Mozley- Standridge et al. 2009, Simmons et al. 2009, Wakefield et al. 2010, Vélez et al. 2011). These analy- Study sites and sampling ses have profoundly improved our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships and diversity of zoo - Lake Tuscaloosa (LT) and Lake Lurleen (LL) are 2 sporic fungi. However, the majority of sequences re- freshwater reservoirs situated in the Black Warrior covered from lakes have not matched any de scribed River basin, Alabama, USA (Ward et al. 2005). LT zoosporic fungi and do not affiliate with any known has a surface area of 24 km2 and a maximum depth zoosporic fungal taxa. These results suggest that of 30 m, while LL has a surface area of 1 km2 and a lakes harbor a high and largely unexplored zoosporic maximum depth of 10 m. Samplings and measure- fungal diversity that perhaps represents novel phylo- ments were taken every 1 to 2 wk from December genetic lineages. 2007 to November 2008 (LT) and from October In this context, the present study had 2 main objec- 2008 to November 2009 (LL) at a central point in each tives: (1) from an ecological standpoint, to describe lake (LT: 33° 17’ 24.61’’ N, 87° 30’ 41.43’’ W; LL: 33° 17’ the community structure of freshwater zoosporic 27.65’’ N, 87° 30’ 40.51’’ W). Temperature and dis- fungi in 2 lakes differing in their trophic status and solved oxygen vertical profiles were obtained using a the dynamics of the recovered diversity during 2 con- YSI550A multiparameter probe (YSI). To describe the trasted seasons of the year; and (2) from a phyloge- phytoplanktonic community and characterize the Lefèvre et al.: Planktonic fungal community in freshwater lakes 93 fungal parasitism potentially associated with this purification was performed using the NucleoSpin community, phytoplanktonic samples were collected Plant kit (Macherey-Nagel). DNA was quantified us- in triplicate using a vertical plankton tow (60 µm ing a Nanodrop ND-1000 (NanoDrop Technologies), mesh size) from the bottom of the euphotic zone and its integrity (i.e. unsheared high molecular (approximated using a Secchi disc) to the surface. In weight DNA) was checked on a 1% agarose gel. For the laboratory, phytoplanktonic samples were pro- each sample, a partial 28S (~900 base pairs) fragment cessed following the protocol described by Wetzel & was amplified using LROR (5’-ACC CGC TGA ACT Likens (1990). Cells were observed using a Nikon TAA GC-3’) and LR5 (5’-TCC TGA GGG AAA CTT Labophot-2 microscope and identified using identifi- CG-3’) eukaryotic primers (Vilgalys & Hester 1990). cation keys from Smith (1950) and Wehr & Sheath PCR reactions were performed in 50 µl containing −1 (2003). Biovolumes were calculated using equations distilled H2O, 2.5 to 5 ng of DNA, 200 µmol l of each provided by Hillebrand et al. (1999), and a ratio of dNTP, 0.2 µmol l−1 of each primer, 2.5 U of Taq DNA cellular organic carbon to cell volume of 0.1 was used polymerase, and 1X NEB ThermoPol Buffer (New to estimate phytoplanktonic biomass (Wetzel & Eng land Biolabs). The PCR program consisted of Likens 1990). Water samples for molecular analysis 2 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, and chlorophyll a measurements were collected in 1 min at 50°C, and 1 min at 72°C, and a final triplicate every meter from the bottom of the eu pho - extension of 10 min at 72°C (MJ Research PTC-200 tic zone (varying from 2 to 5 m and 1 to 3 m for LT and thermocycler, Bio-Rad).