DOCSLIB.ORG

Amphibians, Reptiles and Mammals … a Species Checklist for the Gila

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amphibians, Reptiles and Mammals … a Species Checklist for the Gila Using the Checklist Vegetation types on the Gila National Forest range from spruce/fir on the Fish, Mogollon Mountains and the Black Range, to Desert Scrub and remnant Grassland at lower elevations in the Burro Mountains. Ponderosa pine is the Amphibians, dominant species at mid-elevations, 6,000 to 7,000 feet. Piñon/Juniper or oak/juniper/piñon woodland is found on drier sites throughout the forest. This Reptiles and extreme range in elevation and the many corresponding vegetation types provide for a diverse fauna which includes 30 fish species, 11 amphibians, 44 reptiles and 84 mammals. Resident status is given only for migratory bats (see Mammals … below). The remaining categories describe the habitat(s) where one is most A Species Checklist for The Gila National Forest likely to encounter each species, and specific habitat requirements. Checklist Key C – Common U – Uncommon F – Fairly Common X -- Extirpated R – Rare Vegetation Type Preference 1. Desert 6. Spruce-Fir 2. Oak Woodland 7. Mt. Grassland 3. Oak-Juniper 8. Marsh/Open 4. Piñon-Juniper 9. Decid. Riparian 5. Ponderosa Pine 10. Conif. Riparian Residency The Residence column is for bats only and lists the time of year each Species normally appears in the checklist area. P – Permanent Resident S – Summer Resident W – Winter Resident Federal Status The particular status of species that are “listed” is shown in parenthesis PREPARED BY following the name. United States Forest Service Southwestern Department of Region E-Endangered T-Threatened S- Sensitive *R-Reintroduced Agriculture Illustrations by Hank Pavlokovich PRODUCED IN COOPERATION WITH Southwestern New Mexico Audubon Society *The Mexican Gray Wolf was reintroduced to the area in 1998. Information on this & Department of Natural Science, species was added to this listing by the staff of the Gila Visitor Center in March 2004. Western New Mexico University n n r r -Fi -Fi e e Desert Oak Woodland Oak-Juniper Pinyon-Juniper Ponderosa Pine Spruc Mt. Grassland Marsh/Ope Decid. Riparian Conif.Riparian Abundance Residence Desert Oak Woodland Oak-Juniper Pinyon-Juniper Ponderosa Pine Spruc Mt. Grassland Marsh/Ope Decid. Riparian Conif.Riparian Abundance Residence Fish __Flathead Catfish F ■ Pylodictis olivaris Trout, Salmon, and Graylings Topminows -Poeciliidae Salmonidae Gila Trout (E) R ■ __Gila Topminnows (E) X ■ Oncorhynchus gilae Poeciliopsis occidentalis __Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout (S) R ■ __Mosquitofish C ■ Orcorhynchus clarki virginalis Gambusia affinis __Rainbow Trout C ■ Sunfishes - Centrarchidae Oncorhynchus mykiss __Smallmouth Bass C ■ __Cutthroat Trout F ■ Micropterus dolomieui Oncorhynchus clarki __Largemouth Bass U ■ __Brown Trout F ■ Micropterus salmoides Salmo trutta __Bluegill C ■ Minnows-Cyprinidae Lepomis macrochirus __Chihuahua Chub (E) R ■ __Green Sunfish C ■ Gila nigrescens Leopomis cyanellus __Roundtail Chub (S) F ■ __ Longear Sunfish U ■ Gila robusta Lepomis megalotis __Spikedace (T) R ■ White Crappie F ■ Meda fulgida Pomoxis annularis __Loach Minnow (T) R ■ Tiaroga cobitis __Speckled Dace C ■ Rhinichthys osculus __Longfin Dace C ■ Agosia chrysogaster __Fathead Minnow U ■ Pimephales promelas __Red Shiner F ■ Cyprinella lutrensis __Beautiful Shiner (E) X ■ Cyprinella formosa __Carp F ■ Cyprinus carpio Suckers - Catostomidae __ Desert Sucker F ■ Pantosteus clarki Rio Grande Sucker (S) U ■ Pantosteus plebeius __Sonora Sucker F ■ Catostomus insignis Catfish-Ictaluridae __Channel Catfish F ■ Ictalurus punctatus __Black Bullhead U ■ Ictalurus melas __Yellow Bullhead F ■ Ictalurus natalis n n r r -Fi e -Fi e Abundance Residence Desert Oak Woodland Oak-Juniper Pinyon-Juniper Ponderosa Pine Spruc Mt. Grassland Marsh/Ope Decid. Riparian Conif.Riparian Abundance Residence Desert Oak Woodland Oak-Juniper Pinyon-Juniper Ponderosa Pine Spruc Mt. Grassland Marsh/Ope Decid. Riparian Conif.Riparian Amphibians Reptiles Salamanders - Turtles-Kinosternidae Ambystomatidae Tiger Salamander C ■ Sonora Mud Turtle F ■ ■ Ambystoma tigrinum Kinostemon sonoriense Spadefoot Toads - Box Turtles - Testudinidae Pelobatidae __Ornate Box Turtle F ■ ■ ■ __New Mexico Spadefoot C ■ ■ ■ Terrapene ornata Scaphiopus multiplicatus t Softshell Turtle Toads - Bufonidae Trionychidae __Woodhouse’s Toad C ■ ■ __Spiny Softshell R ■ ■ Bufo woodhousii Trionyx spiniferus __Southwestern Toad F ■ ■ Beaded Lizards Bufo microscaphus Helodermatidae __Red-Spotted Toad F ■ ■ ■ __Gila Monster R ■ ■ Bufo punctatus Heloderma suspectum Hylid Frogs - Hylidae Geckos __Western Chorus Frog F ■ ■ Gekkonidae Pseudacris triseriata __Western Banded Gecko U ■ ■ __Mountain Treefrog F ■ ■ Coleonyx variegatus Hyla eximia Iguanas __Canyon Treefrog F ■ ■ ■ ■ Iguanidae Hyla arenicolor __Collared Lizard F ■ ■ Frogs-Ranidae Crotaphytus collaris __Bullfrog C ■ ■ __Lesser Earless Lizard F ■ Rana catesbeiana Holbrookia maculata __Chiricahua Leopard Frog R ■ ■ ■ __Greater Earless Lizard C ■ ■ Rana catesbeiana Cophosaurus texanus Lowland Leopard Frog R ■ __Crevice Spiny Lizard F ■ ■ ■ ■ Rana yavapaiensis Sceloporus poinsettii ■ ■ ■ ■ __Eastern Fence Lizard C Sceloporus undulatus __Clark’s Spiny Lizard F ■ ■ ■ Sceloporus clarkii __Plateau Lizard F ■ ■ Sceloporus virgatus __Desert Spiny Lizard F ■ Sceloporus magister __Tree Lizard C ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Urosaurus Ornatus Short-horned Lizard C ■ ■ ■ ■ Phrynosoma douglassii Texas Horned Lizard U ■ Phrynosoma cornutum Round Tailed Lizard U ■ Phrynosoma modestum n n r r -Fi -Fi e e Abundance Residence Desert Oak Woodland Oak-Juniper Pinyon-Juniper Ponderosa Pine Spruc Mt. Grassland Marsh/Ope Decid. Riparian Conif.Riparian Abundance Residence Desert Oak Woodland Oak-Juniper Pinyon-Juniper Ponderosa Pine Spruc Mt. Grassland Marsh/Ope Decid. Riparian Conif.Riparian Skinks - Scincidae __Southwestern Blackhead R ■ ■ ■ Snake __Many-lined Skink U ■ ■ Tantilla hobartsmithi Eumeces multivirgatus __Sonora Mountain Kingsnake U ■ ■ ■ __Great Plains Skink F ■ ■ ■ Lampropeltis pyromelana Eumeces obsoletus Coral Snakes-Elapidae Teids (Whiptails) - Teidae __Chihuahuan Spotted Whiptail F ■ ■ __Arizona Coral Snake R ■ ■ Micruroides euryxanthus Cnemidophorus exsanguis C ■ ■ ■ ■ Pit Vipers - Crotalidae _ Desert Grassland Whiptail Cnemidophorus uniparens __Black-tailed Rattlesnake C ■ ■ ■ ■ __ Western Whiptail C ■ ■ Crotalus molossus Cnemidophorus tigris __Western Diamond-backed C ■ ■ ■ __Gila Spotted Whiptail F ■ ■ ■ Rattlesnake - Crotalus atrox Cnemidophorus flagellicaudus __Western Rattlesnake C ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Crotalus viridis Anguids - Anguidae __Rock Rattlesnake U ■ ■ ■ __Madrean Alligator Lizard F ■ ■ Crotalus lepidus Elgaria kingii Slender Blind Snakes Leptotyphlopidae __Texas Blind Snake R ■ ■ Leptotyphlops dulcis __Western Blind Snake U ■ ■ ■ Leptotyphlops humilis Colubrids - Colubridae __Black-necked Garter Snake C ■ Thamnophis cyrtopsis __Narrowhead Garter Snake U ■ ■ Thamnophis rufipunctatus __Checkered Garter Snake F ■ Thamnophis marcianus __Western Terrestrial Garter C ■ ■ Snake - Thamnophis elegans Striped Whipsnake C ■ ■ Masticophis taeniatus Ring-necked Coachwhip C ■ ■ n Snake r -Fi Masticophis flagellum e Bull Snake C ■ ■ ■ ■ Pituophis melanoleucus Abundance Residence Desert Oak Woodland Oak-Juniper Pinyon-Juniper Ponderosa Pine Spruc Mt. Grassland Marsh/Ope Decid. Riparian Conif.Riparian __Big Bend Patchnose Snake F ■ ■ Salvadora deserticola Mammals __Mountain Patchnose Snake U ■ Shrews - Soricidae Salvadora grahamiae __Plains Blackhead Snake U ■ ■ ■ ■ __Merriam’s Shrew R ■ ■ Tantilla nigriceps Sorex merriami __Common Kingsnake U ■ ■ ■ Dusky Shrew C ■ Lampropeltis getulus Sorex monticolus Abundance Residence Desert Oak Woodland Oak-Juniper Pinyon-Juniper Ponderosa Pine Spruce-Fir Mt. Grassland Marsh/Open Decid. Riparian Conif.Riparian Abundance Residence Desert Oak Woodland Oak-Juniper Pinyon-Juniper Ponderosa Pine Spruce-Fir Mt. Grassland Marsh/Open Decid. Riparian Conif.Riparian Desert Shrew C ■ ■ ■ ■ Squirrels Sciuridae Notiosorex crawfordi __Abert’s Squirrel C ■ Plain Nose Bats Sciurus aberti Vespertilionidae __Arizona Gray Squirrel U ■ __Southwestern Myotis F S ■ ■ ■ ■ Sciurus arizonensis Myotis auriculus Red Squirrel C ■ __Yuma Myotis U S ■ ■ ■ Tamiasciurus hudsomicus Myotis yumanensis __Gunnison’s Prairie Dog R ■ ■ Long-eared Myotis C S ■ ■ Cynomys gunnisoni Myotis evotis __Spotted Ground Squirrel U ■ ■ __Fringed Myotis C P ■ ■ ■ ■ Spermophilus spilosoma Myotis thysanodes __Rock Squirrel C ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ __Long-legged Myotis C S ■ ■ ■ ■ Spermophilus variegatus Myotis volans __Thirteen-lined Ground Squirrel R ■ California Myotis C S ■ ■ ■ Spermophilus tridecemlineatus Myotis californica __Golden-mantled Ground C ■ ■ __Little Brown Myotis U S ■ ■ Squirrel Myotis lucifiga Spermophilus lateralis __Western Small-footed Myotis C P ■ ■ ■ __Cliff Chipmunk C ■ ■ ■ ■ Myotis leibii Tamias dorsalis __Silver-haired Bat C S ■ ■ ■ ■ __Gray-collared Chipmunk F ■ Lasionycteris noctivagans Tamias cinereicollis __Western Pipistrelle C S ■ ■ ■ Pocket Gophers - Geomyidae Pipistrellus hesperus __Botta’s Pocket Gopher C ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ __Big Brown Bat C P ■ ■ ■ ■ Thomomys bottae Eptesicus fuscus __Hoary Bat C T ■ ■ ■ ■ Kangaroo Rats and Pocket Lasiurus cinereus Mice - Heteromyidae __Western Red Bat R S ■ __Desert Pocket Mouse F ■ ■ ■ Lasiurus blosseuillii Chaetodipus penicillatus __(Allen’s) Mexican Big-eared Bat F S ■ ■ __Silky Pocket Mouse U ■ ■ ■ ■ Idionycteris phyllotis Perognathus flavus __Spotted Bat R S ■ ■ ■ ■ __Ord’s Kangaroo Rat F ■ ■ ■ Dipodomys ordii Euderma maculatum __Merriam’s Kangaroo Rat C ■ ■ ■ Big-eared Bats Dipodomys merriami __Townsend’s Bat C P
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Checklist and Distribution Maps of the Amphibians and Reptiles of South Dakota
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies Nebraska Academy of Sciences 2000 A Checklist and Distribution Maps of the Amphibians and Reptiles of South Dakota Royce E. Ballinger University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Justin W. Meeker University of Nebraska-Lincoln Marcus Thies University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas Part of the Life Sciences Commons Ballinger, Royce E.; Meeker, Justin W.; and Thies, Marcus, "A Checklist and Distribution Maps of the Amphibians and Reptiles of South Dakota" (2000). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. 49. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/49 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Academy of Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societiesy b an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 2000. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, 26: 29-46 A CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION MAPS OF THE AMPmBIANS AND REPTILES OF SOUTH DAKOTA Royce E. Ballinger, Justin W. Meeker, and Marcus Thies School of Biological Sciences University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0118 rballinger1 @ unl.edu lent treatise on the distribution and ecology of the ABSTRACT turtles of the state in an unpublished dissertation. Fourteen species of amphibians and 30 species of reptiles Several other authors (Dunlap 1963, 1967, O'Roke 1926, are documented from South Dakota, based on the examina­ Peterson 1974, Smith 1963a, 1963b, 1966, Underhill tion of 7,361 museum specimen records.
    [Show full text]
  • (1-5) Or LPN Proposed FY Timeframe Curre
    National Listing Workplan 7-Year Workplan (September 2016 Version) 12M: 12-month finding on a petition to list a species. If listing is warranted, we generally intend to proceed with a concurrent proposed Key to Action Types- listing rule and proposed critical habitat designation, if critical habitat is prudent and determinable. Discretionary Status Review: Status review undertaken by discretion of the Service. Results of the review may be to propose listing, make a species a candidate for listing, provide notice of a not warranted candidate assessment, or other action as appropriate. Proposed Listing Determination: For species that are already candidates for listing, a proposed listing determination would either propose the species for listing or provide notice of a not warranted finding. We generally intend to propose critical habitat designations concurrent with proposed listing rules, to the extent prudent and determinable. Final Listing Determination: For species that have already been proposed for listing, the final listing determination would either finalize or withdraw the proposed listing rule. We generally intend to finalize critical habitat designations concurrent with final listing rules, to the extent prudent and determinable. PCH: Proposed critical habitat rulemaking when not concurrent with a proposed listing rule. FCH: Final critical habitat rulemaking for previously proposed critical habitat. rPCH: Revised proposed critical habitat for previously proposed, but not finalized, critical habitat needing revision. Priority
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of a Subset of Historically Known Populations of The
    Section 6 (Texas Traditional) Report Review Form emailed to FWS S6 coordinator (mm/dd/yyyy): 9/11/2017 TPWD signature date on report: 8/31/2017 Project Title: To provide more evidence for the presence/absence of the southern spot-tailed earless lizard (Holbrookia lacerata subcaudalis; STEL) in southern Texas. Final or Interim Report? Final Grant #: TX-E-165-R Reviewer Station: Austin ESFO Lead station concurs with the following comments: NA (reviewer from lead station) Interim Report (check one): Final Report (check one): Acceptable (no comments) Acceptable (no comments) Needs revision prior to final report (see Needs revision (see comments below) comments below) Incomplete (see comments below) Incomplete (see comments below) Comments: FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT As Required by THE ENDANGERED SPECIES PROGRAM TEXAS Grant No. TX E-165-R (F14AP00824) Endangered and Threatened Species Conservation An Inventory of a Subset of Historically Known Populations of the Spot-tailed Earless Lizard (Holbrookia lacerata) Prepared by: Mike Duran Carter Smith Executive Director Clayton Wolf Director, Wildlife 31 August 2017 Final Report TPWD Contract #458178—31 August 2017 FINAL REPORT STATE: ____Texas_______________ GRANT NUMBER: ___ TX E-165-R-1__ GRANT TITLE: An Inventory of a Subset of Historically Known Populations of the Spot-tailed Earless Lizard (Holbrookia lacerata). REPORTING PERIOD: ____1 September 2014 to 31 August 2017 OBJECTIVE(S). To provide more evidence for the presence/absence of the southern spot-tailed earless lizard (Holbrookia lacerata subcaudalis; STEL) in southern Texas. Segment Objectives: Task 1. March 1 – June 30, 2015 – Spring surveys. Task 2. September 15 – October 31, 2015 – Fall surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release Albuquerque, NM 87103 505/248-6911 505/248-6915 (Fax)
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Public Affairs Office PO Box 1306 News Release Albuquerque, NM 87103 505/248-6911 505/248-6915 (Fax) Southwest Region (Arizona ● New Mexico ● Oklahoma ●Texas) www.fws.gov/southwest/ For Release: May 23, 2011 Contacts: Alisa Shull, (512) 490-0057 Lesli Gray, (972) 569-8588 THE SPOT-TAILED EARLESS LIZARD MAY WARRANT PROTECTION UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT The spot-tailed earless lizard (Holbrookia lacerata) may warrant federal protection as a threatened or endangered species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announced today, following an initial review of a petition seeking to protect the spot-tailed earless lizard under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Service finds that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that listing the spot-tailed earless lizard may be warranted. This finding is based on potential threats posed by predation from fire ants. Fire ants are known to adversely impact native fauna in general, including reptiles. Fire ants occur across a large part of the spot-tailed earless lizard’s range and may pose a threat through direct predation on adults, hatchlings and eggs. The spot-tailed earless lizard is divided into two distinct subspecies, based on morphological (physical) differences and geographic separation. The northern spot-tailed earless lizard subspecies (Holbrookia lacerata lacerata) historically occurred throughout the Edwards Plateau in Texas. The southern spot-tailed earless lizard (Holbrookia lacerata subcaudalis) historically occurred through south Texas into parts of Mexico’s States of Coahuila, Nuevo Leon, and Tamaulipas. The present population of the spot-tailed earless lizard’s population status is largely unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Disturbance and Wildlife Conservation in Western Grasslands
    Evolution and management of the North American grassland herpetofauna Norman J. Scott, Jr.1 Abstract.—The modern North American grassland herpetofauna has evolved in situ since the Miocene. Pleistocene glaciation had a minimal effect except in the far North, with only minor displacements of some species. South of the glaciers, winters were warmer and summers cooler than at present. Snake- like reptiles, leaping frogs, and turtle “tanks” are favored adaptive types in uniform dense grassland. A typical fauna consists of about 10-15 species, mostly snakes. Special habitat components, such as streams and ponds, bare ground, sand, trees, prairie dog towns, and rocky outcrops, add distinct suites of species. There is also an increase in species number from north to south and west to east. Grassland use and management, such as prairie dog con- trol, off-road vehicle traffic, and brush removal, have demonstrable effects on the herpetofauna. However, the effects of three of the most widespread management procedures—water development, grazing, and fire—are largely unstudied. Although highly fragmented, the majority of species of grassland reptiles and amphibians are widespread and populations are resilient, but there are special conservation problems associated with Pleistocene relicts with limited distributions. INTRODUCTION Parmenter et al. (1994) documented the excep- tionally high vertebrate diversity in southwestern At the time of the arrival of Europeans in North rangelands, and they emphasized that preserva- America, much of the interior of the continent was tion of this biodiversity in the remaining habitat covered by grasslands. The heart of this great fragments will depend on skillful management of expanse was the tallgrass prairie of the human activities in a fashion that integrates faunal midwestern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians and Reptiles of the State of Coahuila, Mexico, with Comparison with Adjoining States
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 593: 117–137Amphibians (2016) and reptiles of the state of Coahuila, Mexico, with comparison... 117 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.593.8484 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Amphibians and reptiles of the state of Coahuila, Mexico, with comparison with adjoining states Julio A. Lemos-Espinal1, Geoffrey R. Smith2 1 Laboratorio de Ecología-UBIPRO, FES Iztacala UNAM. Avenida los Barrios 1, Los Reyes Iztacala, Tlalnepantla, edo. de México, Mexico – 54090 2 Department of Biology, Denison University, Granville, OH, USA 43023 Corresponding author: Julio A. Lemos-Espinal ([email protected]) Academic editor: A. Herrel | Received 15 March 2016 | Accepted 25 April 2016 | Published 26 May 2016 http://zoobank.org/F70B9F37-0742-486F-9B87-F9E64F993E1E Citation: Lemos-Espinal JA, Smith GR (2016) Amphibians and reptiles of the state of Coahuila, Mexico, with comparison with adjoining statese. ZooKeys 593: 117–137. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.593.8484 Abstract We compiled a checklist of the amphibians and reptiles of the state of Coahuila, Mexico. The list com- prises 133 species (24 amphibians, 109 reptiles), representing 27 families (9 amphibians, 18 reptiles) and 65 genera (16 amphibians, 49 reptiles). Coahuila has a high richness of lizards in the genus Sceloporus. Coahuila has relatively few state endemics, but has several regional endemics. Overlap in the herpetofauna of Coahuila and bordering states is fairly extensive. Of the 132 species of native amphibians and reptiles, eight are listed as Vulnerable, six as Near Threatened, and six as Endangered in the IUCN Red List. In the SEMARNAT listing, 19 species are Subject to Special Protection, 26 are Threatened, and three are in Danger of Extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles of the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge, Comanche County, Oklahomal ROBERT G
    ACADEMY OF SCIENCE FOR 1953 87 Reptiles of the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge, Comanche County, Oklahomal ROBERT G. WEBB and .A. L ORTENBUBGER, UnITerslt)- of Oklahoma, Norman Since Ortenburger's list of amphibians and reptiles from the Wichita Mountains appeared (12), additional collections by various workers have increased the number of known species of reptiles from the region. It seems advisable to assemble the existing records of the reptUian fauna so that a recent summary will be .available. This list includes all the reptiles known from Comanche County. Most or the records however, are from the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge and reflect more intensive collecting in this mountainous area than in the adjacent lower parts of the county. A few species reported from the low­ lands have not as yet been collected in the mountains. 'There are no reptiles confined to the Wichita Mountains. Notes on the taxonomy and habits of certain species are included when pertinent. Localities are given for those species that have not been taken In the Refuge. All specimens are deposited in the University of Oklahoma Museum of Zoology (UOMZ) (Now the University of Oklahoma Museum, Division of Zoology). Mr. Frank B. McMurray, former biologist at the Refuge is responsible for many of the records and has donated a large series of specimens to the University of Oklahoma. The Wichita Mountains are located mostly in Comanche County but extend westward through Kiowa County to eastern Greer County. The Refuge, comprising 61,480 acres, is located in the northwestern part of Comanche County about 25 miles north of Fort sm, and occupies a dis­ sected plateau at an elevation of approximately 1600 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Chihuahuan Desert National Parks Reptile and Amphibian Inventory
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Chihuahuan Desert National Parks Reptile and Amphibian Inventory Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/CHDN/NRTR—2011/489 ON THE COVER Trans-Pecos Ratsnake (Bogertophis subocularis subocularis) at Big Bend National Park, Texas. Photograph by Dave Prival. Chihuahuan Desert National Parks Reptile and Amphibian Inventory Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/CHDN/NRTR—2011/489 Authors: Dave Prival and Matt Goode School of Natural Resources University of Arizona Editors: Ann Lewis Physical Science Laboratory New Mexico State University M. Hildegard Reiser Chihuahuan Desert Inventory & Monitoring Program National Park Service September 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States State of the Union
    STATE OF THE UNION: Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States STATE OF THE UNION: Legal Authority Over the Use of Native Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States Coordinating Editors Priya Nanjappa1 and Paulette M. Conrad2 Editorial Assistants Randi Logsdon3, Cara Allen3, Brian Todd4, and Betsy Bolster3 1Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Washington, DC 2Nevada Department of Wildlife Las Vegas, NV 3California Department of Fish and Game Sacramento, CA 4University of California-Davis Davis, CA ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS WE THANK THE FOLLOWING PARTNERS FOR FUNDING AND IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT, EDITING, AND PRODUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT: US Fish & Wildlife Service Competitive State Wildlife Grant Program funding for “Amphibian & Reptile Conservation Need” proposal, with its five primary partner states: l Missouri Department of Conservation l Nevada Department of Wildlife l California Department of Fish and Game l Georgia Department of Natural Resources l Michigan Department of Natural Resources Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies Missouri Conservation Heritage Foundation Arizona Game and Fish Department US Fish & Wildlife Service, International Affairs, International Wildlife Trade Program DJ Case & Associates Special thanks to Victor Young for his skill and assistance in graphic design for this document. 2009 Amphibian & Reptile Regulatory Summit Planning Team: Polly Conrad (Nevada Department of Wildlife), Gene Elms (Arizona Game and Fish Department), Mike Harris (Georgia Department of Natural Resources), Captain Linda Harrison (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), Priya Nanjappa (Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies), Matt Wagner (Texas Parks and Wildlife Department), and Captain John West (since retired, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) Nanjappa, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Structure of Holbrookia Lacerata (Cope 1880) (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae): One Species Or Two?
    Zootaxa 4619 (1): 139–154 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4619.1.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EF128EAA-B282-4012-A448-ADE6C6BE7506 Phylogenetic structure of Holbrookia lacerata (Cope 1880) (Squamata: Phrynosomatidae): one species or two? TOBY J. HIBBITTS1,2, WADE A. RYBERG2, JOHANNA A. HARVEY1, GARY VOELKER1, A. MICHELLE LAWING3, CONNOR S. ADAMS2, DALTON B. NEUHARTH2, DREW E. DITTMER4, C. MICHAEL DURAN5, BRAD D. WOLAVER6, JON PAUL PIERRE6, BENJAMIN J. LABAY7,† & TRAVIS J. LADUC7 1Biodiversity Research and Teaching Collection, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Sta- tion, TX 77843-2258 2Natural Resources Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843 3Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843-2120 4Texas Tech University, Department of Natural Resources Management, 2500 Broadway, Lubbock,Texas 79409 5The Nature Conservancy, San Antonio, TX 78215, 6Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78758,USA 7Biodiversity Collections, Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78758-4445 † Benjamin J. Labay currently at Siglo Group, Austin, TX 78702 Abstract Species delimitation attempts to match species-level taxonomy with actual evolutionary lineages. Such taxonomic conclusions are typically, but not always, based on patterns of congruence across multiple data sources and methods of analyses. Here, we use this pluralistic approach to species delimitation to help resolve uncertainty in species boundaries of phrynosomatid sand lizards of the genus Holbrookia.
    [Show full text]
  • Year of the Lizard News No
    Year of the Lizard News No. 4 July 2012 V V V V V V V V V V www.YearoftheLizard.org Lizards Across the Land: Federal Agencies’ Role From Alaska to Hawaii to Florida, hundreds of millions of acres of our public lands are held in trust by federal land management agencies. Many of these lands support rich and diverse populations of lizards. The following collection of articles provides a sample of the outstanding scholarly and practical work being conducted on our federal public lands. Biologists at these and other federal agencies are hard at work to answer many important questions regarding A Copper-striped Blue-tailed Skink (Emoia impar) the science of lizard conservation and management and to photographed in Samoa during a USGS field survey. identify and conserve priority habitats for lizards and other Photo: Chris Brown, USGS. native wildlife. “No other landscape in these United States has —Terry Riley, National Park Service, National PARC been more impacted by extinction events and species Federal Agencies Coordinator invasions in historic times than the Hawaiian Islands, with as yet unknown long-term cascading consequences USGS Reveals “Cryptic Extinction” of Pacific to the ecosystem,” said U.S. Geological Survey director Lizard Marcia McNutt. “Today, we close the book on one more animal that is unlikely to ever be re-established in this A species of lizard is now extinct from the Hawaiian fragile island home.” Islands, making it the latest native vertebrate species to “This skink was once common throughout the become extirpated from this tropical archipelago. Hawaiian Islands, and in fact the species can still be The Copper-striped Blue-tailed Skink (Emoia impar) — found on many other island groups in the tropical a sleek lizard with smooth, polished scales and a long, sky- blue tail — was last confirmed in the Na’Pali coast of Kauai continued on p.
    [Show full text]