Great Master Bodhidharma: His Life and Teachings a Lecture Series Given in February 2021 - by Rev
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Great Master Bodhidharma: His Life and Teachings A lecture Series given in February 2021 - by Rev. Master Leandra Robertshaw - 1: Setting the Scene I have chosen to offer these talks largely because I know many trainees have a particular attraction to Bodhidharma and his teachings. I seem to have come to share their sense of him but at first more circumspectly. This may be part of a general questioning of what it is to be a monk and how we conduct ourselves as monks of the OBC. Nowadays I dare to question our rites and rituals and whether they do help us to live our lives as fully as any human being can so that we really know in a way that is beyond belief, that we all have the potential to become Buddha. This seems to be the essence of any spiritual life, though other spiritual traditions would, of course, describe it differently. Nowadays I love and respect Bodhidharma’s iconoclastic approach and smile at the legends that abound around his life and death. How much is fantasy; how much is weaving an intriguing story; how much is verifiable fact at this distance of many centuries later? Bodhidharma (Bodaidaruma) is our 28th Ancestor as Makakashyô is considered the first Ancestor (see the Denkôroku). Bodhidharma is also thought of as the first Zen Ancestor in our Ancestral line. Why was he given the title of the “first ancestor of Zen” given that there were so-called Zen masters in China before he arrived? I will return to this question in due course. The descriptions of his life has aberrations, or maybe ‘variations’ is a more polite word to use. It helps to see the somewhat different descriptions of his life as an inevitability as they are more like hagiographies; i.e descriptions the life of a saint, rather than an accurate biographies. He was the subject of many legends. Along with Zen and kung-fu, he reportedly brought tea to China. To keep from falling asleep while meditating, he cut off his eyelids and where they fell tea bushes grew. Hence there are descriptions, as well as drawings, paintings and sculptures of a monk with 1 bulging, lidless eyes. Buddhism came to China 2,000 years ago. Since then, thousand of Indian and Central Asian monks have journeyed to China by land and sea, but among those who brought the teaching of Buddha to China, none has had an impact comparable to that of Bodhidharma. Bodhidharma was born in the late 5th or early 6th century in southern India, the third son of a local monarch of the warrior cast. His father King Kôshi had a reverence for Buddhism. You can read the description of King Kôshi’s three sons in the Denkôroku and how Hannyatara who became Bodhidharma’s master, tested the spiritual wisdom of the three princes by showing them a priceless pearl and asking Can anything rival this pearl? Hearing Bodhidharma’s eloquent response Hannyatara knew that Bodhidharma was karmically descended from a sage. Yet, he still held back for a while before he accepted Bodhidharma as his disciple. Bodhidharma was Hannyatara’s disciple for forty years and when his Master died and he was approaching his sixties he knew his karmic connection with China had ripened and he sailed for three years crossing the Southern Sea to arrive at Nankai where the well-known audience with Emperor Wu took place. Emperor Wu is portrayed as a devout Buddhist intent on gaining merit through good works. He told Bodhidharma that he had been working very hard to establish Buddhism in China. Then he asked how much merit he would have earned. Bodhidharma replied “None whatsoever”. This first teaching of Bodhidharma was that all deeds are empty not because they are devoid of meaning, but because nothing is fixed and separate. He sought to turn the emperor’s attention away from spiritual success to an understanding of emptiness. What is emptiness? The Chinese word is Wu, the Japanese Mu. Empty doesn’t mean nothing; there is a fullness in emptiness because everything is connected. All our thoughts, opinions and experiences come from our interactions with everything else. My views are just a collection of others’ views. Views are not a problem. The problem is that we live our lives on the basis of attachment to an ingrained assumption and identity, namely that we possess 2 a permanent “I”. We may think we know ourselves and others, but really we do not. Because of our rigid assumptions, we categorise things in terms of good and bad, and to be honest, specifically things that are good or bad for “me”. In responding None whatsoever, Bodhidharma attempts to subvert the emperor’s religious piety, leaving him with nowhere to stand and nothing to grasp. This story leads me to consider whether I am a pious being at all! Probably not and I feel somewhat embarrassed to say this but not ashamed. Why not? It could be that instead I touch a deep sincerity in trying to follow the path, not only for my gratification but also trusting it can help others to find their own individual way in human life. There is a real wish to know the Truth. The emperor’s second question was “Who is facing me?” Bodhidharma replied “I don’t know.” Bodhidharma’s provocative replies are a challenge to let go of consoling beliefs and dwell in the unknowing perplexity of emptiness. Isn’t this a grave challenge for all of us? Can we let go of consoling beliefs and dwell in the perplexity of emptiness? Some days this can feel more challenging than I can bear and I long for easeful death (Keats). This is familiar territory and from time-to-time I am drawn back into the memory of a three-month winter retreat at the hermitage. I did not turn to Rev. Master Daishin for help. Why not? Was it a sort of obstinacy? Or a vivid sense that only I could find my way. Somehow Rev. Master must have sensed the struggle because he sent an encouraging card about finding a way in the echo chamber of the mind which helped me to investigate the nature of my own immediate experience and to investigate questions about training that arose for me. For instance, was monasticism really the path for me? If I stepped out of monastic life would this take away the pain and confusion? But I knew in my bones that was a hiding to nothing. So I tried another tack any found myself looking to death as the way out. I was drawn to reread Keats’s Ode to a Nightingale where he describes being “...half in love with easeful death.” 3 Finally, at last, at last, I stopped trying to dodge the pain, I ‘knew’ there was no way out, nothing to do but sit as still with feelings and thoughts as I could manage at each and every moment. These words of Shantideva’s were a lifeline: I should dispel the pain of others Because it hurts like my own And I should be good to them Because they feel just as I do When both they and I Are the same in wanting joy And not desiring pain What is so special about me? It was at this stage that my important friendship the neighbours across the valley came into being. The loving connection has endured even though nowadays I rarely see them. After his encounter with Emperor Wu Bodhidharma recalled Hannyatara’s words Do not abide in the South and went north. It is said by literal-minded people that he floated there on a reed and you have probably seen drawings of him floating on a reed. In fact, a reed is the name for a small passenger boat so called because of its shape; it was not an actual reed. He made his way to Mount Sung where an emperor had constructed Shaolin Temple. Some accounts say he stayed in the monastery’s east gallery, others say that he spent nine years facing the rock wall of a cave about a mile from the temple. No one could fathom what he was doing when he sat cross-legged throughout the day facing a wall; as a consequence they called him “The Brahmin who contemplates the wall.” What we recite in Rules for Meditation is “...although Bodhidharma transmitted the Buddha Mind, we still hear the echoes of his nine years facing a wall...” How blessed we are to have him as an Ancestor. Bodhidharma had few disciples, the most prominent being Taiso Eka (Hui-ko) to whom he entrusted his robe and bowl and it is said by some the Lankavatara Sutra. Was this the case others wonder as Bodhidharma in his teachings mostly quotes from the Nirvana, Avatamsaka and Vimalakirti 4 Sutras. So perhaps it was Taiso Eka not Bodhidharma who thought so highly of the Lankavatara Sutra. Here is another example of Bodhidharma’s teaching. Legend has it that when Taiso Eka, or Huike to use his Chine name, first sought out Bodhidharma for his teachings he said: “I am here to receive your teachings. I seek the Dharma.” Bodhidharma’s terse response was: “Dharma? I have nothing to teach you. I have nothing to say.” Taiso Eka: “But my mind is not at ease. Please pacify it for me.” Before becoming a monk, Taiso Eka had been an army general who killed many people - dis-ease and guilt weighed heavily on him. Bodhidharma said: “Bring me your mind and I will pacify it.” Taiso Eka: “I cannot find my mind.” Bodhidharma; “Then I have already pacified it.” Looking at another mystery, that of Bodhidharma’s death, was it true that he was poisoned by a jealous monk? Were his remains interred at a temple on Bear Ear Mountain? Or was it true that three years after his reported “death” he was said to be seen walking in the mountains of Central Asia, carrying a staff from which hung a single sandal? This rendition of his life says he was returning to India.