Irrational Exuberance for Babies: the Taste for Heterosexuality and Its Conspicuous Reproduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Florida International University College of Law eCollections Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2008 Irrational Exuberance for Babies: The Taste for Heterosexuality and its Conspicuous Reproduction Jose M. Gabilondo College of Law, Florida International University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Family Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Jose M. Gabilondo, Irrational Exuberance for Babies: The Taste for Heterosexuality and its Conspicuous Reproduction , 28 B.C. Third World L.J. 1 (2008). Available at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications/87 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at eCollections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCollections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 28 B.C. Third World L.J. 1 2008 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Fri Nov 14 18:51:48 2014 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0276-3583 IRRATIONAL EXUBERANCE ABOUT BABIES: THE TASTE FOR HETEROSEXUALITY AND ITS CONSPICUOUS REPRODUCTION Jost GABILONDO* Abstract: This article targets a flying buttress of normative heterosexu- ality: its physical reproduction via procreation and its symbolic propaga- tion through parents' pre-natal preferences for heterosexuality in future children. While the parental "taste for heterosexuality" is often asserted for the sake of future children themselves, this justification overlooks the role of parental self-interest, including anticipated social gains to parents from heterosexuality in children. Hence the taste sets the stage both for sexual orientation-based abuse of future children and the de- valuation of sexual minority adults. Courts too have a taste for hetero- sexuality, shown here in two state court cases denying gays and lesbians the right to marry. These courts hold that homosexuals reproduce de- liberately while heterosexuals may do so recklessly, leading the courts to conclude that only heterosexuals require marriage to ensure stable homes for children. These decisions "subsidize" normative heterosexuality and its reproduction by conferring symbolic capital on both. Apart from the burdens it places on sexual minorities, this symbolic privilege comes at a cost to heterosexuals and children alike. By privileging the reproduc- tion of normative heterosexuality, this symbolic economy discourages heterosexuals from fully appreciating the long-term consequences of re- production. This economy also gives them a pretext for avoiding life- style competition with homosexual parents, to the detriment of children who might benefit from the improved parenting technique that such competition would encourage. * © 2008,Jos6 Gabilondo, Associate Professor, Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall, College of Law, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, [email protected]. B.A., Harvard College, 1987, J.D., University of California, Berkeley, 1991. Feedback I received at the University ofJvaskala's (Helsinki) conference on the philosophy of gender and at George- town Law Center's Socioeconomics Conference improved these arguments, as did readers who helped with mortification of the text: iSchdegel!, Tom Gallanis, Ruthann Robson, Penny Pether, Larry Cati Backer, Nan Hunter, Bill Turner, Heather Hughes, Hannibal Travis, Tim Canova, Adele Morrison, Natalia Gerodetti, Joe Dayball, and, in particular, Diane Klein, John Gordon, Jorge Esquirol, and Bob Chang. I dedicate this article to the integrity of ChiefJudge Kaye's dissent in Hernandez v.Robles. Boston College Third World Law Journal [Vol. 28:1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................. 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 2 I. HETEROSEXUALITY OFFSPRING PREFERENCE .................................... 11 A. The ParentalTaste for Heterosexuality and Its Reproduction ......... 11 B. Ajudicial Analogue: Morrison and Hernandez ................... 21 1. Reproduction in the Culture Wars over Marriage ............... 21 2. Judicial Alchemy: Morrisonand Hernandez.......................... 26 3. Copula Copularum: Understanding Judicial Incoherence Through Paranoia ...................................................................... 35 II. PERFECTING OBSERVER STATUS IN HETEROSEXUAL REPRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 4 2 A. Bourdieu: the Individual as Cell of Social Reproduction............ 42 B. Heterosexual Time-Inconsistency in the Habitus....................... 46 C. Children as Capital................................................................ 51 III. IM PLICATIONS ................................................................................. 61 A. Lifestyle Competition: ManagingEugenic Disappointment in the F am ily ......................................................................................... 62 B. The Wages of Coitus: Heterosexual Counterdemand.................. 65 C ON CLU SIO N ........................................................................................... 72 INTRODUCTION People have babies for many reasons and sometimes for no ap- parent reason at all. We tend to celebrate having babies with equal zeal, though, regardless of whether the baby is intended or accidental. Indeed, we celebrate even the abstract idea of having babies. Econo- mist Gary Becker introduced an economic model to explain why het- erosexuals, in particular, have babies. He suggests that babies, like other commodities, give their parents "income" in the broad sense in which economists use that term.1 He asserts that, just as with other commodities, the number and type of children one has are functions of the would-be parent's "tastes."2 I Gary S. Becker, An Economic Analysis of Fertility, in NAT'L BUREAU OF ECON. RESEARCH, DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC CHANGE IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIEs 209, 209-40 (1960) [hereinafter Becker, Fertility]; GARY S. BECKER, A TREATISE ON THE FAMILY 138 (1991) [hereinafter BECKER, FAMILY]; see also Bernard M. S. Van Praag & Marcel F. Warnaar, The Costs of Children and the Use of DemographicVariables in ConsumerDemand, in IA HANDBOOK OF POPULATION AND FAMILY ECONOMICS 241, 245-50 (Mark Rosenzweig & Oded Stark eds., 1997) (summarizing alternative methods of estimating the costs of children). 2 Becker, Fertility, supra note 1, at 211. Becker notes that ultimately it is personal (and class) taste that determines the demand for children: "The utility from children is com- 20081 IrrationalExuberance About Babies Putting to one side the morality of thinking about human life in the instrumental terms which Becker attributes to parents, Becker's view that reproduction is a lifestyle choice helps illustrate how market dynamics bear on reproduction and, in particular, on parental prefer- ences about outcomes in children. 3 One place to see such reproduc- tive tastes at work is in the over-the-counter markets for babies that legal and business scholars have noted. 4 These "baby markets" reflect a wide range of parental tastes, including the race discount which 5 Michele Goodwin has noted in the adoption market. Might there also be a taste for heterosexuality in offspring, like the racialized taste addressed by Goodwin? Indeed. It is my conten- tion that some heterosexual would-be parents apply a "gay discount" or a "straight premium" when thinking about future children and that the prospect of capturing social approval through the anticipated heterosexuality of children encourages reproduction. In other words, pared with that from other goods via ... a set of indifference curves. The shape of the indifference curves is determined by the relative preference for children, or, in other words, by 'tastes.'" Id. 3 For example, Becker suggests that "[t]he net cost of children is reduced if they con- tribute to family income by performing household chores, working in the family business, or working in the marketplace." BECKER, FAMILY, supra note 1, at 138-39. Then an in- crease in the "earning" potential of children would increase the demand for children. See id. 4 See, e.g., DEBORA L. SPAR, THE BABY BUSINESS: How MONEY, SCIENCE, AND POLITICS DRIVE THE COMMERCE OF CONCEPTION, at xi (2006) (describing the market structure for realizing would-be parents' prenatal preferences for offspring); Martha M. Ertman, What's Wrong with a Parenthood Market? A New and Improved Theory of Commodification, 82 N.C. L. REv. 1, 7, 35 (2003) (arguing that market operations in parenthood may contribute to self- realization by sexual minorities, and noting that "[a]cademic hand wringing about whether selling parenthood would be a good thing implies that we do not already buy and sell it. But the practice is alive and well in various guises, direct and indirect.");