Helicobacter Pylori: Types of Diseases, Diagnosis, Treatment and Causes Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rapid Urease Test (RUT) for Evaluation of Urease Activity in Oral Bacteria In
Dahlén et al. BMC Oral Health (2018) 18:89 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0541-3 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Rapid urease test (RUT) for evaluation of urease activity in oral bacteria in vitro and in supragingival dental plaque ex vivo Gunnar Dahlén*, Haidar Hassan, Susanne Blomqvist and Anette Carlén Abstract Background: Urease is an enzyme produced by plaque bacteria hydrolysing urea from saliva and gingival exudate into ammonia in order to regulate the pH in the dental biofilm. The aim of this study was to assess the urease activity among oral bacterial species by using the rapid urease test (RUT) in a micro-plate format and to examine whether this test could be used for measuring the urease activity in site-specific supragingival dental plaque samples ex vivo. Methods: The RUT test is based on 2% urea in peptone broth solution and with phenol red at pH 6.0. Oral bacterial species were tested for their urease activity using 100 μl of RUT test solution in the well of a micro-plate to which a 1 μl amount of cells collected after growth on blood agar plates or in broth, were added. The color change was determined after 15, 30 min, and 1 and 2 h. The reaction was graded in a 4-graded scale (none, weak, medium, strong). Ex vivo evaluation of dental plaque urease activity was tested in supragingival 1 μl plaque samples collected from 4 interproximal sites of front teeth and molars in 18 adult volunteers. The color reaction was read after 1 h in room temperature and scored as in the in vitro test. -
Helicobacter Pylori and Peptic Ulcers
Helicobacter pylori and Peptic Ulcers [Announcer] This podcast is presented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC – safer, healthier people. [Karen Hunter] Hello, I'm Karen Hunter. With me today is Dr. David Swerdlow, senior advisor for epidemiology in the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We’re talking about a paper that appears in the September 2010 issue of the CDC's journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases. The article looks at hospitalization rates for peptic ulcer disease in American patients who may have been infected with the bacteria Helicobacter pylori. Welcome, Dr. Swerdlow. [David Swerdlow] Thank you very much. [Karen Hunter] Dr. Swerdlow, what is Helicobacter pylori and how does it affect people? [David Swerdlow] Helicobacter pylori, or H. pylori for short, is a very common spiral-shaped bacteria that can colonize your stomach. It is estimated that about 50 percent of the world is infected, with most people becoming infected in childhood. Although the majority of people infected with H. pylori do not have any symptoms, infection with the bacteria can cause a variety of gastrointestinal diseases, including peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancers. The rate of infection with H. pylori is decreasing in most of the world, primarily because of improvements in hygiene and sanitation, but since infection is life-long, unless treated, many people are still at risk for peptic ulcer disease. [Karen Hunter] What is it about an infection with H. pylori that increases the risk of developing peptic ulcer disease? [David Swerdlow] H. pylori can colonize and damage the protective lining of your stomach and create chronic inflammation. -
Study of the Effect of Post-Operative Medical Management on Peptic Ulcer in Patients of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease
International Surgery Journal Deshmukh SB et al. Int Surg J. 2016 Aug;3(3):1267-1272 http://www.ijsurgery.com pISSN 2349-3305 | eISSN 2349-2902 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20161459 Research Article Study of the effect of post-operative medical management on peptic ulcer in patients of perforated peptic ulcer disease Sudhir B. Deshmukh1, Koushal U. Kondawar2, Satish Gireboinwd3, Meghraj J. Chawada4* 1Professor and HOD, 2PG Student, 3Assistant Professor, 4Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, S. R. T. R. Government Medical College, Ambejogai, Maharashtra, India Received: 11 May 2016 Accepted: 14 May 2016 *Correspondence: Dr. Meghraj J. Chawada E-mail: [email protected] Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT Background: Peptic ulcer disease remains one of the most prevalent diseases of the gastrointestinal tract with annual incidence 1 ranging from 0.1% to 0.3% in India. Cases of peptic ulcer perforation are commonly encountered in our institute. The objective was to study the effect of post-operative medical management on peptic ulcer in patients of perforated peptic ulcer disease. Methods: A prospective non randomized study was conducted among all diagnosed cases of peptic ulcer perforation patients admitted through emergency or OPD in surgery ward in our hospital. Patient’s case record was evaluated to collect following data: personal information, past history of peptic ulcer disease, use of non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs for heart disease or osteoarthritis was taken. -
An Osteopathic Approach to Gastrointestinal Disease
REVIEW An Osteopathic Approach to Gastrointestinal Disease: Somatic Clues for Diagnosis and Clinical Challenges Associated With Helicobacter pylori Antibiotic Resistance Alicia Smilowicz, DO From HealthCalls LLC The estimated prevalence of gastritis in the general US population is approxi- in Portland, Maine, and mately 50%. Patients with gastrointestinal disease often present to the primary the University of New England College of care practitioner with dyspepsia and abdominal pain. Osteopathic palpatory Osteopathic Medicine in evaluation suggests that there is an association among gastrointestinal dis- Biddeford, Maine. ease, the presence of posterior midthoracic pain, and chronic headache. On Financial Disclosures: the basis of findings from a review of the literature, the author assesses the po- None reported. tential etiologic mechanisms of this clinical association. Possible mechanisms Address correspondence to include the physiologic function of the vagus nerve, a neural convergence Alicia Smilowicz, DO, 466 Ocean Ave, Portland, model, and the inherent properties of Helicobacter pylori. To demonstrate the ME 04103-5718. clinical significance of these mechanisms, the author presents the case of a E-mail: docsmilo 30-year-old woman with headache, thoracic discomfort, and gastritis associ- @yahoo.com ated with H pylori infection. The author suggests that successful treatment of Received August 2, 2012; patients with gastrointestinal disease includes osteopathic manipulative treat- revision received November 21, 2012; ment, behavioral modification, and pharmacotherapy, even when challenged accepted by antibiotic resistance. January 6, 2013. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013;113(5):404-416 n the practice of clinical medicine, we commonly associate dyspepsia, abdominal pain, nausea, and anorexia with the possible existence of pathologic mechanisms for gastro- Iintestinal disease. -
Epstein–Barr Virus and Helicobacter Pylori Co-Infection in Non-Malignant Gastroduodenal Disorders
pathogens Review Epstein–Barr Virus and Helicobacter Pylori Co-Infection in Non-Malignant Gastroduodenal Disorders Ramsés Dávila-Collado 1, Oscar Jarquín-Durán 1, Le Thanh Dong 2 and J. Luis Espinoza 3,* 1 Faculty of Medicine, UNIDES University, Managua 11001, Nicaragua; [email protected] (R.D.-C.); [email protected] (O.J.-D.) 2 Faculty of Medical Technology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi 116001, Vietnam; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kodatsuno 5-11-80, Kanazawa 920-0942, Ishikawa, Japan * Correspondence: luis@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp Received: 20 January 2020; Accepted: 5 February 2020; Published: 6 February 2020 Abstract: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are two pathogens associated with the development of various human cancers. The coexistence of both microorganisms in gastric cancer specimens has been increasingly reported, suggesting that crosstalk of both pathogens may be implicated in the carcinogenesis process. Considering that chronic inflammation is an initial step in the development of several cancers, including gastric cancer, we conducted a systematic review to comprehensively evaluate publications in which EBV and H. pylori co-infection has been documented in patients with non-malignant gastroduodenal disorders (NMGDs), including gastritis, peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and dyspepsia. We searched the PubMed database up to August 2019, as well as publication references and, among the nine studies that met the inclusion criteria, we identified six studies assessing EBV infection directly in gastric tissues (total 949 patients) and three studies in which EBV infection status was determined by serological methods (total 662 patients). -
Helicobacter Heilmannii Associated Erosive Gastritis
CASE REPORT Helicobacter heilmannii Associated Erosive Gastritis Takafumi Yamamoto, Jun Matsumoto, Ken Shiota, Shin-ichi Kitajima*, Masamichi Goto*, Masaomi Imaizumi* and Terukatsu Arima The spiral bacteria, Helicobacter heilmannii (H heilmannii), distinct from Helicobacterpylori (H. pylori), was found in the gastric mucosa of a 71-year-old manwithout clinical symptoms. The endoscopic examination revealed erosive gastritis. Rapid urease test from the antral specimen was positive, but both culture and immunohistological staining for Hpylori were negative. Touch smear cytology showedtightly spiral bacteria, which were consistent with H.heilmannii. At the second endoscopy after medication regimen for eradication of H. pylori, inflammation was decreased and the rapid urease test was negative. The second cytology showedno evidence of Hheilmannii. Anti-H.pylori therapy may be a useful medication for H.heilmannii. (Internal Medicine 38: 240-243, 1999) Keywords: gastric spiral bacteria, touch smear cytology, eradication Introduction previously been healthy. He had a clinical history of Hansen's disease (leprosy). His family history was noncontributory. He Since 1983 when Warren and Marshall (1) first described reported no history of smoking or alcohol, but earlier had a pet Helicohacterpylori (H.pylori) and its association with chronic cat. Neither anemia nor jaundice was present. Abdomenwas gastritis, there have been manyreports of microbiological and flat and soft. Liver, spleen and mass were not palpable. Labo- clinical studies about H.pylori infection. It has been generally ratory data of our clinic waswithin the normal range. Serum accepted that H.pylori infection causes atrophic gastritis, gas- anti-H.pylori immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (HELICO-G) tric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. -
The Puzzle of Coccoid Forms of Helicobacter Pylori: Beyond Basic Science
antibiotics Review The Puzzle of Coccoid Forms of Helicobacter pylori: Beyond Basic Science 1, , 1,2, 1 1 3 Enzo Ierardi * y , Giuseppe Losurdo y , Alessia Mileti , Rosa Paolillo , Floriana Giorgio , Mariabeatrice Principi 1 and Alfredo Di Leo 1 1 Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University “Aldo Moro” of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy; [email protected] (G.L.); [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (R.P.); [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (A.D.L.) 2 Ph.D. Course in Organs and Tissues Transplantation and Cellular Therapies, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University “Aldo Moro” of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy 3 THD S.p.A., 42015 Correggio (RE), Italy; fl[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-08-05-593-452; Fax: +39-08-0559-3088 G.L. and E.I. contributed equally and are co-first Authors. y Academic Editor: Nicholas Dixon Received: 20 April 2020; Accepted: 29 May 2020; Published: 31 May 2020 Abstract: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) may enter a non-replicative, non-culturable, low metabolically active state, the so-called coccoid form, to survive in extreme environmental conditions. Since coccoid forms are not susceptible to antibiotics, they could represent a cause of therapy failure even in the absence of antibiotic resistance, i.e., relapse within one year. Furthermore, coccoid forms may colonize and infect the gastric mucosa in animal models and induce specific antibodies in animals and humans. Their detection is hard, since they are not culturable. Techniques, such as electron microscopy, polymerase chain reaction, loop-mediated isothermal amplification, flow cytometry and metagenomics, are promising even if current evidence is limited. -
Helicobacter Pylori Infections: Culture from Stomach Biopsy, Rapid Urease Test (Cutest®), and Histologic Examination of Gastric Biopsy
Available online at www.annclinlabsci.org 148 Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science, vol. 45, no. 2, 2015 An Efficiency Comparison between Three Invasive Methods for the Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infections: Culture from Stomach Biopsy, Rapid Urease Test (CUTest®), and Histologic Examination of Gastric Biopsy Avi Peretz1, Avi On 2, Anna Koifman1, Diana Brodsky1, Natlya Isakovich1, Tatyana Glyatman1, and Maya Paritsky3 1Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, 2Pediatric Gastrointestinal Unit, and 3Gastrointestinal Unit, Baruch Padeh Medical Center, Poria, affiliated to the Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University, Galille, Israel Abstract. Background. Helicobacter pylori is one of the most prevalent pathogenic bacteria in the world, and humans are its principal reservoir. There are several available methods to diagnose H. pylori infection. Disagreement exists as to the best and most efficient method for diagnosis. Methods. In this paper, we report the results of a comparison between three invasive methods for H. pylori diagnosis among 193 pa- tients: culture, biopsy for histologic examination, and rapid urease test (CUTest®). Results. We found that all three methods have a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of infections caused by H. pylori. However, the culture method, which is not used routinely, also showed high sensitivity, probably due to biopsies’ seeding within 30 minutes, using warm culture media, non-selective media, and longer incuba- tion. Conclusions. Although not a routine test, culture from biopsy can be meaningful in identification of antibiotic-resistant strains of H. pylori and should therefore be considered a useful diagnostic tool. Keywords: Helicobacter pylor, Culture, Urease test, Gastric biopsy. Introduction Helicobacter pylori is one of the most prevalent Recently, a close association was found between H. -
Do Perforated Gastric Ulcers Require Routine
DO PERFORATED GASTRIC ULCERS REQUIRE ROUTINE INTRA-OPERATIVE BIOPSY? Meryl Dache Oyomno A research report submitted to the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Medicine (General Surgery). Johannesburg, 2018 i DECLARATION I, Meryl Dache Oyomno, declare that this research report is my own work. It is being submitted for the degree of Master of Medicine (General Surgery) at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before either whole or in part for any degree or examination at this or in any other university. ………………………………. On the ……. day of………. 2017 ii DEDICATION To my parents, Violet and Gordon Oyomno. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe a great debt of gratitude to Dr. Martin Brand, a remarkable supervisor! He was an enormous help in the formulation of the research question and protocol and read multiple drafts of the written report. I appreciate the quick responses and helpful feedback, the guidance and expert advice. In the same breath, I would like to thank Professor Damon Bizos for not only helping me come up with the research topic but for his constant guidance and support. I would also like thank the Wits postgraduate Hub statistical consultation team and Dr. Petra Gaylard of Data management and statistical analysis DMSA for their assistance in the data analysis and statistics. iv PRESENTATIONS ARISING FROM RESEARCH REPORT Oral Presentation 1. Do perforated gastric ulcers require routine intra-operative biopsy? A study in three Gauteng public hospitals. Bert Myburgh Research Forum 2015 v ABSTRACT Background. -
Comparative Analysis of Four Campylobacterales
REVIEWS COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FOUR CAMPYLOBACTERALES Mark Eppinger*§,Claudia Baar*§,Guenter Raddatz*, Daniel H. Huson‡ and Stephan C. Schuster* Abstract | Comparative genome analysis can be used to identify species-specific genes and gene clusters, and analysis of these genes can give an insight into the mechanisms involved in a specific bacteria–host interaction. Comparative analysis can also provide important information on the genome dynamics and degree of recombination in a particular species. This article describes the comparative genomic analysis of representatives of four different Campylobacterales species — two pathogens of humans, Helicobacter pylori and Campylobacter jejuni, as well as Helicobacter hepaticus, which is associated with liver cancer in rodents and the non-pathogenic commensal species, Wolinella succinogenes. ε CHEMOLITHOTROPHIC The -subdivision of the Proteobacteria is a large group infection can lead to gastric cancer in humans 9–11 An organism that is capable of of CHEMOLITHOTROPHIC and CHEMOORGANOTROPHIC microor- and liver cancer in rodents, respectively .The using CO, CO2 or carbonates as ganisms with diverse metabolic capabilities that colo- Campylobacter representative C. jejuni is one of the the sole source of carbon for cell nize a broad spectrum of ecological habitats. main causes of bacterial food-borne illness world- biosynthesis, and that derives Representatives of the ε-subgroup can be found in wide, causing acute gastroenteritis, and is also energy from the oxidation of reduced inorganic or organic extreme marine and terrestrial environments ranging the most common microbial antecedent of compounds. from oceanic hydrothermal vents to sulphidic cave Guillain–Barré syndrome12–15.Besides their patho- springs. Although some members are free-living, others genic potential in humans, C. -
Postoperative Care and Functional Recovery After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Vs
OBES SURG (2018) 28:1031–1039 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2964-3 ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS Postoperative Care and Functional Recovery After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Among Patients Under ERAS Protocol Piotr Major1,2 & Tomasz Stefura 3 & Piotr Małczak1,2 & Michał Wysocki 2,3 & Jan Witowski2,3 & Jan Kulawik1 & Mateusz Wierdak1,2 & Magdalena Pisarska1,2 & Michał Pędziwiatr 1,2 & Andrzej Budzyński1,2 Published online: 23 October 2017 # The Author(s) 2017. This article is an open access publication Abstract Results The rate of postoperative nausea and vomiting and Background The most commonly performed bariatric pro- incidence of intravenous fluid administration during the oper- cedures are laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and ation was higher in LSG group. LRYGB patients were able to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). There tolerate higher oral fluid intake volumes during the first and are major differences between LSG and LRYGB during the second postoperative day. Mean diuresis during the second postoperative period. Optimization of the postoperative and the third postoperative day was significantly higher in care may be achieved by using enhanced recovery after LRYGB group. Administration of diuretics and painkillers surgery (ERAS) protocol, which allows earlier functional was comparable between groups, while the risk of fever after recovery. the operation was higher in LRYGB group. Mean length of stay Purpose The aim was to assess differences in the course of was higher in LSG group (LRYGB vs. LSG, 3.46 days ± 1.58 postoperative care conducted in accordance with ERAS pro- vs. 3.64 days ± 4.41, p =0.039). -
Helicobacter Spp. — Food- Or Waterborne Pathogens?
FRI FOOD SAFETY REVIEWS Helicobacter spp. — Food- or Waterborne Pathogens? M. Ellin Doyle Food Research Institute University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison WI 53706 Contents34B Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 Virulence Factors ...........................................................................................................................2 Associated Diseases .......................................................................................................................2 Gastrointestinal Disease .........................................................................................................2 Neurological Disease..............................................................................................................3 Other Diseases........................................................................................................................4 Epidemiology.................................................................................................................................4 Prevalence..............................................................................................................................4 Transmission ..........................................................................................................................4 Summary .......................................................................................................................................5