DOCSLIB.ORG

Chondrichthyan Bycatch: Risk Assessment, Spatiotemporal Trends and Contributions to Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chondrichthyan Bycatch: Risk Assessment, Spatiotemporal Trends and Contributions to Management CHONDRICHTHYAN BYCATCH: RISK ASSESSMENT, SPATIOTEMPORAL TRENDS AND CONTRIBUTIONS TO MANAGEMENT MARCELO REIS A thesis submitted in fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy at the University of Sydney School of Life and Environmental Sciences Coastal and Marine Ecosystems Group Sydney, Australia August 2018 Attribution of authorship for published and collaborative work contained in this thesis The work contained in the body of this thesis, except otherwise acknowledged, is the result of my own investigations. For the four data chapters, I led and undertook the following: study design, field organization, data analysis, and writing of thesis chapters. - Chapter 2 and Chapter 3: I wrote these studies entirely and conducted the analyses based on the database built upon individual fishing logbooks provided by the Australian Fisheries Management Authority – AFMA. The study was designed by me in collaboration with the Co- Author Dr. Will Figueira. - Chapter 4 and Chapter 5: Sample collection was made by the Department of Primary Industries, New South Wales – DPI Fisheries Observer Program under the Animal Research Authority permission ACEC Ref 16/02 provided by the Primary Industries (Fisheries) Animal Care & Ethics Committee. The study was designed by me in collaboration with the Co-Author Dr. Will Figueira. Samples processing and collection of data as well data analyses writing of the study were conducted by me. Marcelo Reis Signature: Date: 23/08/2018 Table of Contents List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... iii Epigraph ............................................................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. ix Thesis abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 – General Introduction: Australian chondrichthyans: Diversity, Status, Fisheries and Threats ........................................................................................................................................... 3 IUCN Status of Australian Chondrichthyans ............................................................................ 4 The bycatch threat ....................................................................................................................... 6 Chondrichthyan fisheries in Australia ........................................................................................ 7 Conservation and Management ................................................................................................. 9 Research objectives of this work ............................................................................................. 10 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 2 – Assessing the relative vulnerability of Chondrichthyes species as bycatch using spatially reported catch data series ................................................................................................. 15 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................... 15 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 16 METHODS....................................................................................................................................... 18 The Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery ..................................................... 18 Species Occurrence Database ................................................................................................ 20 Fishery Interaction Index ........................................................................................................... 21 Species resilience ...................................................................................................................... 23 Assessing vulnerability .............................................................................................................. 23 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 26 Catch events ............................................................................................................................... 26 Fishery interaction index ........................................................................................................... 27 Catch-MSY results ..................................................................................................................... 27 Resilience parameters ............................................................................................................... 27 Fishery interaction index and resilience parameters ............................................................ 28 Overall Priorities ......................................................................................................................... 32 DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................................. 35 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 39 iii Chapter 3 – Spatial and temporal trends in bycatch diversity of chondrichthyans in Australia fisheries ................................................................................................................................................ 41 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................... 41 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 42 METHODS....................................................................................................................................... 44 Data source ................................................................................................................................. 44 Data analysis ............................................................................................................................... 45 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 49 Frequency of Bycatch ................................................................................................................ 49 Chondrichthyan bycatch ratios ................................................................................................. 49 Chondrichthyan bycatch per unit of effort ............................................................................... 56 Chondrichthyan bycatch diversity ............................................................................................ 64 DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................................. 70 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 75 Chapter 4 – Age, growth and reproductive biology of two endemic demersal bycatch chondrichthyans: Trygonorrhina fasciata & Dipturus australis from Eastern Australia ........... 78 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................... 78 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 79 METHODS....................................................................................................................................... 82 Sample source ............................................................................................................................ 82 Body metrics and condition ....................................................................................................... 83 Age and growth ........................................................................................................................... 84 Reproductive capacity ............................................................................................................... 86 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 87 Length and Length-Weight Relationships .............................................................................. 87 Age and Growth .......................................................................................................................... 88 Body condition and reproductive data ..................................................................................... 92 DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Fishing and Illegal Trade of the Angelshark DNA Barcoding
    Fisheries Research 206 (2018) 193–197 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fisheries Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fishres The fishing and illegal trade of the angelshark: DNA barcoding against T misleading identifications ⁎ Ingrid Vasconcellos Bunholia, Bruno Lopes da Silva Ferrettea,b, , Juliana Beltramin De Biasia,b, Carolina de Oliveira Magalhãesa,b, Matheus Marcos Rotundoc, Claudio Oliveirab, Fausto Forestib, Fernando Fernandes Mendonçaa a Laboratório de Genética Pesqueira e Conservação (GenPesC), Instituto do Mar (IMar), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Santos, SP, 11070-102, Brazil b Laboratório de Biologia e Genética de Peixes (LBGP), Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu (IBB), Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, 18618-689, Brazil c Acervo Zoológico da Universidade Santa Cecília (AZUSC), Universidade Santa Cecília (Unisanta), Santos, SP, 11045-907, Brazil ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handled by J Viñas Morphological identification in the field can be extremely difficult considering fragmentation of species for trade Keywords: or high similarity between congeneric species. In this context, the shark group belonging to the genus Squatina is Conservation composed of three species distributed in the southern part of the western Atlantic. These three species are Endangered species classified in the IUCN Red List as endangered, and they are currently protected under Brazilian law, which Fishing monitoring prohibits fishing and trade. Molecular genetic tools are now used for practical taxonomic identification, parti- Forensic genetics cularly in cases where morphological observation is prevented, e.g., during fish processing. Consequently, DNA fi Mislabeling identi cation barcoding was used in the present study to track potential crimes against the landing and trade of endangered species along the São Paulo coastline, in particular Squatina guggenheim (n = 75) and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Database of Living/Fossil Sharks, Rays and Chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the Year 2016
    www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Bibliography database of living/fossil sharks, rays and chimaeras (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali) Papers of the year 2016 published by Jürgen Pollerspöck, Benediktinerring 34, 94569 Stephansposching, Germany and Nicolas Straube, Munich, Germany ISSN: 2195-6499 copyright by the authors 1 please inform us about missing papers: [email protected] www.shark-references.com Version 13.01.2017 Abstract: This paper contains a collection of 803 citations (no conference abstracts) on topics related to extant and extinct Chondrichthyes (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) as well as a list of Chondrichthyan species and hosted parasites newly described in 2016. The list is the result of regular queries in numerous journals, books and online publications. It provides a complete list of publication citations as well as a database report containing rearranged subsets of the list sorted by the keyword statistics, extant and extinct genera and species descriptions from the years 2000 to 2016, list of descriptions of extinct and extant species from 2016, parasitology, reproduction, distribution, diet, conservation, and taxonomy. The paper is intended to be consulted for information. In addition, we provide information on the geographic and depth distribution of newly described species, i.e. the type specimens from the year 1990- 2016 in a hot spot analysis. Please note that the content of this paper has been compiled to the best of our abilities based on current knowledge and practice, however,
    [Show full text]
  • Extinction Risk and Conservation of the World's Sharks and Rays
    RESEARCH ARTICLE elife.elifesciences.org Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays Nicholas K Dulvy1,2*, Sarah L Fowler3, John A Musick4, Rachel D Cavanagh5, Peter M Kyne6, Lucy R Harrison1,2, John K Carlson7, Lindsay NK Davidson1,2, Sonja V Fordham8, Malcolm P Francis9, Caroline M Pollock10, Colin A Simpfendorfer11,12, George H Burgess13, Kent E Carpenter14,15, Leonard JV Compagno16, David A Ebert17, Claudine Gibson3, Michelle R Heupel18, Suzanne R Livingstone19, Jonnell C Sanciangco14,15, John D Stevens20, Sarah Valenti3, William T White20 1IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; 2Earth to Ocean Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; 3IUCN Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group, NatureBureau International, Newbury, United Kingdom; 4Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point, United States; 5British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 6Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia; 7Southeast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service, Panama City, United States; 8Shark Advocates International, The Ocean Foundation, Washington, DC, United States; 9National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand; 10Global Species Programme, International Union for the Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Classification of Elasmobranchs
    An introduction to the classification of elasmobranchs 17 Rekha J. Nair and P.U Zacharia Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi-682 018 Introduction eyed, stomachless, deep-sea creatures that possess an upper jaw which is fused to its cranium (unlike in sharks). The term Elasmobranchs or chondrichthyans refers to the The great majority of the commercially important species of group of marine organisms with a skeleton made of cartilage. chondrichthyans are elasmobranchs. The latter are named They include sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras. These for their plated gills which communicate to the exterior by organisms are characterised by and differ from their sister 5–7 openings. In total, there are about 869+ extant species group of bony fishes in the characteristics like cartilaginous of elasmobranchs, with about 400+ of those being sharks skeleton, absence of swim bladders and presence of five and the rest skates and rays. Taxonomy is also perhaps to seven pairs of naked gill slits that are not covered by an infamously known for its constant, yet essential, revisions operculum. The chondrichthyans which are placed in Class of the relationships and identity of different organisms. Elasmobranchii are grouped into two main subdivisions Classification of elasmobranchs certainly does not evade this Holocephalii (Chimaeras or ratfishes and elephant fishes) process, and species are sometimes lumped in with other with three families and approximately 37 species inhabiting species, or renamed, or assigned to different families and deep cool waters; and the Elasmobranchii, which is a large, other taxonomic groupings. It is certain, however, that such diverse group (sharks, skates and rays) with representatives revisions will clarify our view of the taxonomy and phylogeny in all types of environments, from fresh waters to the bottom (evolutionary relationships) of elasmobranchs, leading to a of marine trenches and from polar regions to warm tropical better understanding of how these creatures evolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2018-2019)
    IUCN Red List version 2019-3: Table 7 Last Updated: 10 December 2019 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2018-2019) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2018 (IUCN Red List version 2018-2) and 2019 (IUCN Red List version 2019-3) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered [CR(PE) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct), CR(PEW) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct in the Wild)], EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2018) List (2019) change version Category
    [Show full text]
  • Life-History Characteristics of the Eastern Shovelnose Ray, Aptychotrema Rostrata (Shaw, 1794), from Southern Queensland, Australia
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Marine and Freshwater Research, 2021, 72, 1280–1289 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF20347 Life-history characteristics of the eastern shovelnose ray, Aptychotrema rostrata (Shaw, 1794), from southern Queensland, Australia Matthew J. Campbell A,B,C, Mark F. McLennanA, Anthony J. CourtneyA and Colin A. SimpfendorferB AQueensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Agri-Science Queensland, Ecosciences Precinct, GPO Box 267, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia. BCentre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture and College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. The eastern shovelnose ray (Aptychotrema rostrata) is a medium-sized coastal batoid endemic to the eastern coast of Australia. It is the most common elasmobranch incidentally caught in the Queensland east coast otter trawl fishery, Australia’s largest penaeid-trawl fishery. Despite this, age and growth studies on this species are lacking. The present study estimated the growth parameters and age-at-maturity for A. rostrata on the basis of sampling conducted in southern Queensland, Australia. This study showed that A. rostrata exhibits slow growth and late maturity, which are common life- history strategies among elasmobranchs. Length-at-age data were analysed within a Bayesian framework and the von Bertalanffy growth function (VBGF) best described these data. The growth parameters were estimated as L0 ¼ 193 mm À1 TL, k ¼ 0.08 year and LN ¼ 924 mm TL. Age-at-maturity was found to be 13.3 years and 10.0 years for females and males respectively. The under-sampling of larger, older individuals was overcome by using informative priors, reducing bias in the growth and maturity estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Age, Growth and Reproductive Biology of Two Endemic Demersal
    ZOOLOGIA 37: e49318 ISSN 1984-4689 (online) zoologia.pensoft.net RESEARCH ARTICLE Age, growth and reproductive biology of two endemic demersal bycatch elasmobranchs: Trygonorrhina fasciata and Dentiraja australis (Chondrichthyes: Rhinopristiformes, Rajiformes) from Eastern Australia Marcelo Reis1 , Will F. Figueira1 1University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences. Edgeworth David Building (A11), Room 111, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. [email protected] Corresponding author: Marcelo Reis ([email protected]) http://zoobank.org/51FFF676-C96D-4B1A-A713-15921D9844BF ABSTRACT. Bottom-dwelling elasmobranchs, such as guitarfishes, skates and stingrays are highly susceptible species to bycatch due to the overlap between their distribution and area of fishing operations. Catch data for this group is also often merged in generic categories preventing species-specific assessments. Along the east coast of Australia, the Eastern Fiddler Ray, Trygonorrhina fasciata (Muller & Henle, 1841), and the Sydney Skate, Dentiraja australis (Macleay, 1884), are common components of bycatch yet there is little information about their age, growth and reproductive timing, making impact assessment difficult. In this study the age and growth (from vertebral bands) as well as reproductive parameters of these two species are estimated and reported based on 171 specimens of Eastern Fiddler Rays (100 females and 71 males) and 81 Sydney Skates (47 females and 34 males). Based on von Bertalanffy growth curve fits, Eastern Fiddler Rays grew to larger sizes than Sydney Skate but did so more slowly (ray: L∞ = 109.61, t0 = 0.26 and K = 0.20; skate: L∞ = 51.95, t0 = -0.99 and K = 0.34 [both sexes combined]). Both species had higher liver weight ratios (HSI) during austral summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Guitarfish, Glaucostegus Cemiculus & G. Granulatus Wedgefish
    EXPERT PANEL SUMMARY Proposals: 43 + 44 Guitarfish, Glaucostegus cemiculus & G. granulatus Wedgefish, Rhynchobatus australiae & R. djiddensis Insufficient Data to make a CITES determination F. Carocci F. G. cemiculus Source: F. Carocci F. G. granulatus Source: F. Carocci F. R. australiae Source: F. Carocci F. R. djiddensis Source: The guitarfish (upper panels There was evidence that wedgefish insufficient to above) and wedgefish (lower Blackchin guitarfish, G. establish declines over the full panels above) are shallow- c e m i c u l u s , a n d o t h e r species range, either for the water coastal species, recog- guitarfish have been extir- long- or short- term rate of nized by the Expert Panel as pated in the northwestern decline, as required to make a being of low-to-medium pro- Mediterranean part of their determination against the ductivity. range. Elsewhere there was CITES criteria. local evidence of long-term The Expert Panel looked for declines guitarfish catches in In considering whether to list stock status information Senegal, but numerical evi- these species, the Expert across the species' range, dence on a larger scale was Panel recommends that bearing in mind the proposal's lacking. CITES parties take note of the argument of high levels of widespread lack of manage- decline. The Expert Panel For wedgefish, the Expert ment in the fisheries taking the noted that population esti- Panel had access to addi- species and the very high mates do not exist for these tional catch datasets from value of the products (fins) in species and stock assess- India and Indonesia, which international trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Status of Mediterranean Chondrichthyan Species
    United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre For Specially Protected Areas REPORT ON THE STATUS OF MEDITERRANEAN CHONDRICHTHYAN SPECIES D. CEBRIAN © L. MASTRAGOSTINO © R. DUPUY DE LA GRANDRIVE © Note : The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of their frontiers or boundaries. © 2007 United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) Boulevard du leader Yasser Arafat B.P.337 –1080 Tunis CEDEX E-mail : [email protected] Citation: UNEP-MAP RAC/SPA, 2007. Report on the status of Mediterranean chondrichthyan species. By Melendez, M.J. & D. Macias, IEO. Ed. RAC/SPA, Tunis. 241pp The original version (English) of this document has been prepared for the Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) by : Mª José Melendez (Degree in Marine Sciences) & A. David Macías (PhD. in Biological Sciences). IEO. (Instituto Español de Oceanografía). Sede Central Spanish Ministry of Education and Science Avda. de Brasil, 31 Madrid Spain [email protected] 2 INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION 3 3. HUMAN IMPACTS ON SHARKS 8 3.1 Over-fishing 8 3.2 Shark Finning 8 3.3 By-catch 8 3.4 Pollution 8 3.5 Habitat Loss and Degradation 9 4. CONSERVATION PRIORITIES FOR MEDITERRANEAN SHARKS 9 REFERENCES 10 ANNEX I. LIST OF CHONDRICHTHYAN OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SEA 11 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition, Commercial Landings, Distribution and Some Aspects of Biology of Guitarfish and Wedgefish (Class Pisces: Order Rhinopristiformes) from Pakistan
    INT. J. BIOL. BIOTECH., 17 (3): 469-489, 2020. SPECIES COMPOSITION, COMMERCIAL LANDINGS, DISTRIBUTION AND SOME ASPECTS OF BIOLOGY OF GUITARFISH AND WEDGEFISH (CLASS PISCES: ORDER RHINOPRISTIFORMES) FROM PAKISTAN Muhammad Moazzam1* and Hamid Badar Osmany2 1WWF-Pakistan, B-205, Block 6, PECHS, Karachi 75400, Pakistan 2Marine Fisheries Department, Government of Pakistan, Fish Harbour, West Wharf, Karachi 74000, Pakistan *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Guitarfish and wedgefish are commercially exploited in Pakistan (Northern Arabian Sea) since long. It is estimated that their commercial landings ranged between 4,206 m. tons in 1981 to 403 metric tons in 2011. Analysis of the landing data from Karachi Fish Harbor (the largest fish landing center in Pakistan) revealed that seven species of guitarfish and wedgefish are landed (January 2019-February 2020 data). Granulated guitarfish (Glaucostegus granulatus) contributed about 61.69 % in total annual landings of this group followed by widenose guitarfish (G. obtusus) contributing about 23.29 % in total annual landings of guitarfish and wedgefish. Annandale’s guitarfish (Rhinobatos annandalei) and bowmouth guitarfish (Rhina ancylostoma) contributed 7.32 and 5.97 % in total annual landings respectively. Spotted guitarfish (R. punctifer), Halavi ray (G. halavi), smoothnose wedgefish (Rhynchobatus laevis) and Salalah guitarfish (Acroteriobatus salalah) collectively contributed about 1.73 % in total annual landings. Smoothnose wedgefish (R. laevis) is rarest of all the members of Order Rhinopristiformes. G. granulatus, G. obtusus, R. ancylostoma, G. halavi and R. laevis are critically endangered according to IUCN Red List whereas A. salalah is near threatened and R. annandalei is data deficient. There are no aimed fisheries for guitarfish and wedgefish in Pakistan but these fishes are mainly caught as by-catch of bottom-set gillnetting and shrimp trawling.
    [Show full text]
  • Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997
    The IUCN Species Survival Commission Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 Edited by Sarah L. Fowler, Tim M. Reed and Frances A. Dipper Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 25 IUCN The World Conservation Union Donors to the SSC Conservation Communications Programme and Elasmobranch Biodiversity, Conservation and Management: Proceedings of the International Seminar and Workshop, Sabah, Malaysia, July 1997 The IUCN/Species Survival Commission is committed to communicate important species conservation information to natural resource managers, decision-makers and others whose actions affect the conservation of biodiversity. The SSC's Action Plans, Occasional Papers, newsletter Species and other publications are supported by a wide variety of generous donors including: The Sultanate of Oman established the Peter Scott IUCN/SSC Action Plan Fund in 1990. The Fund supports Action Plan development and implementation. To date, more than 80 grants have been made from the Fund to SSC Specialist Groups. The SSC is grateful to the Sultanate of Oman for its confidence in and support for species conservation worldwide. The Council of Agriculture (COA), Taiwan has awarded major grants to the SSC's Wildlife Trade Programme and Conservation Communications Programme. This support has enabled SSC to continue its valuable technical advisory service to the Parties to CITES as well as to the larger global conservation community. Among other responsibilities, the COA is in charge of matters concerning the designation and management of nature reserves, conservation of wildlife and their habitats, conservation of natural landscapes, coordination of law enforcement efforts as well as promotion of conservation education, research and international cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul Instituto De Geociências Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Geociências Contribuição
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL INSTITUTO DE GEOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM GEOCIÊNCIAS CONTRIBUIÇÃO AO CONHECIMENTO DOS PTEROSSAUROS DO GRUPO SANTANA (CRETÁCEO INFERIOR) DA BACIA DO ARARIPE, NORDESTE DO BRASIL FELIPE LIMA PINHEIRO ORIENTADOR – Prof. Dr. Cesar Leandro Schultz Porto Alegre - 2014 UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL INSTITUTO DE GEOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM GEOCIÊNCIAS CONTRIBUIÇÃO AO CONHECIMENTO DOS PTEROSSAUROS DO GRUPO SANTANA (CRETÁCEO INFERIOR) DA BACIA DO ARARIPE, NORDESTE DO BRASIL FELIPE LIMA PINHEIRO ORIENTADOR – Prof. Dr. Cesar Leandro Schultz BANCA EXAMINADORA Prof. Dr. Marco Brandalise de Andrade – Faculdade de Biociências, PUC, RS Profa. Dra. Marina Bento Soares – Departamento de Paleontologia e Estratigrafia, UFRGS Profa. Dra. Taissa Rodrigues – Departamento de Biologia, UFES, ES Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências como requisito parcial para a obtenção do título de Doutor em Ciências. Porto Alegre – 2014 “Ao ser destampado pelo gigante, o cofre deixou escapar um hálito glacial. Dentro havia apenas um enorme bloco transparente, com infinitas agulhas internas nas quais se despedaçava em estrelas de cores a claridade do crepúsculo. Desconcertado, sabendo que os meninos esperavam uma explicação imediata, José Arcadio Buendía atreveu-se a murmurar: – É o maior diamante do mundo.” Gabriel García Marquez AGRADECIMENTOS Um trabalho como esse não é feito apenas a duas mãos. Durante o percurso de meu mestrado e doutorado, tive o privilégio de contar com o apoio (por vezes, praticamente incondicional) de diversas pessoas. Em primeiro lugar, pelo apoio irrestrito em todos os momentos, agradeço a minha família, em especial a meus pais, Sandra e Valmiro e a meus irmãos, Fernando e Sacha.
    [Show full text]