DOCSLIB.ORG

Literature Cited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Literature Cited NORTHWEST FAUNA 7:93-102 2012 LITERATURE CITED AGASSIZ L. 1857. Contributions to the natural history BETTELHEIM MP, THAYER CH, TERRY DE. 2006. of the United States of America. Volume I. Boston, Actinemys marmorata (Pacific Pond Turtle). Nest MA: Little, Brown and Company. 452 p. architecture/predation. Herpetological Review 37: ANDERSON DR, BURNHAM KP, FRANKLIN AB, GUTIER­ 213-215. REZ RJ, FORSMAN ED, ANTHONY RG, WHITE GC, BICKHAM JW, IVERSON JB, PARHAM JF, PHILIPPEN H, SHENK TM. 1999. A protocol for conflict resolution RHODIN AGJ, SHAFFER HB, SPRINKS PQ, VAN DIJK in analyzing empirical data related to natural PP. 2007. An annotated list of modern turtle resource controversies. Wildlife Society Bulletin terminal taxa with comments on areas of taxo­ 27:1050-1058. nomic instability and recent change. In: Shaffer ANDREWS KM, GIBBONS JW, JOCHIMSEN DM. 2008. HB, FitzSimmons NN, Georges A, Rhodin AGJ, Ecological effects of roads on amphibians and editors. Defining turtle diversity. Chelonian Re­ reptiles: A literature review. In: Mitchell JC, Jung search Monographs 4:173-199. Brown RE, Bartholomew B, editors. Urban herpe­ BIDER JR, HOEK W. 1971. An efficient and apparently tology. Salt Lake City, UT: Society for the Study of unbiased sampling technique for population stud­ Amphibians and Reptiles. p 121-143. ies of painted turtles. Herpetologica 27:481-484. ARESCO MJ. 2005a. Mitigation measures to reduce BOARMAN W, GOODLETT T, GOODLETT G, HAMILTON P. highway mortality of turtles and other herpeto­ 1998. Review of radio transmitter attachment fauna at a north Florida lake. Journal of Wildlife techniques for turtle research and recommenda­ Management 69:549-560. tions for improvement. Herpetological Review 29: ARESCO MJ. 2005b. The effect of sex-specific terrestrial 26-33. movements and roads on the sex ratio of fresh­ BODIE JR. 2001. Stream and riparian management for water turtles. Biological Conservation 123:37-44. freshwater turtles. Journal of Environmental Man­ ASHTON DT. 2007. Actinemys (= Clemmys) marmorata agement 62:443-455. marmorata (Northwestern Pond Turtle). Courtship BODIE JR, SEMLITSCH RD. 2001. Spatial and temporal behavior. Herpetological Review 38:327-328. use of floodplain habitats by lentic and !otic BAIRD SF, GIRARD C. 1852. Descriptions of new species species of aquatic turtles. Oecologica 122:138- of reptiles collected by the US exploring expedition 146. under the command of Captain Charles Wilkes, BOERSMA PD, REICHARD SH, VAN BUREN AN, editors. U.S.N. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences 6:174-177. 2006. Invasive species in the Pacific Northwest. BANKS RC, McDIARMID RW, GARDNER AL. 1987. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 276 p. Checklist of vertebrates of the United States, the BONDI CA. 2009. A comparison of Western Pond US territories, and Canada. Washington, DC: USDI Turtle (Actinemys marmorata) movements in peren­ Fish and Wildlife Service. Resource Publication nial and intermittent portions of a northwestern 166. 79 p. California river system [thesis]. Arcata, CA: Hum­ BANTA BH. 1963. On the occurrence of Clemmys boldt State University. 74 p. http:/ /humboldt-dspace. marmorata (Reptilia: Testudinata) in western Ne­ calstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/2148/504/CBondi_ vada. Wasmann Journal of Biology 21:75-77. WPf_Thesis2009.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 28 July 2012. BAYLISS LE. 1975. Population parameters for Chrys­ BRAMBLE DM. 1974. Emydid shell kinesis: Biomechan­ emys picta in a New York pond. American Midland ics and evolution. Copeia 1974:707-727. Naturalist 93:168-176. BRATTSTROM BH. 1988. Habitat destruction in Califor­ BELKIN DA, GANS C. 1968. An unusual chelonian nia with special reference to Clemmys marmorata: A feeding niche. Ecology 49:768-769. perspective. In: DeLisle HF, Brown PR, Kaufman BELZER WR, REESE DA. 1995. Radio transmitter B, McGurty BM, editors. Proceedings of the attachment for turtle telemetry. Herpetological Conference of California Herpetologists. Van Review 26:191-192. Nuys, CA: Southwestern Herpetologists Society. BERRY KH. 1986. Desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) Special Publication 4. p 13-24. relocation: Implications of social behavior and BRATTSTROM BH, STURN A. 1959. A new species of movements. Herpetologica 42:113-125. fossil from the Pliocene of Oregon, with notes on BETTELHEIM MP. 2009. Actinemys (= Clemmys) marmor­ other fossil Clemmys from western North America. ata (Western Pond Turtle). Courtship behavior. Bulletin of Southern California Academy of Sci­ Herpetological Review 40:212-213. ences 58:65-71. 93 94 NORTHWEST FAUNA NUMBER 7 BRENKMAN SJ, CONNOLLY PJ. 2008. Protocol for marmorata. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3: monitoring fish assemblages in Pacific Northwest 108-109. National Parks. US Geological Survey Techniques BURY RB, GERMANO OJ. 2008. Actinemys marmorata and Methods 2-A7. 130 p. http:/ /pubs.usgs.gov I (Baird and Girard)-Western Pond Turtle, Pacific tm/tm2a7 /pdf/tm2a7.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2012. Pond Turtle. In: Rhodin AGJ, Pritchard PCH, van BRITSON CA, GUTZKE WH. 1993. Antipredator mech­ Dijk PP, Saumure RA, Buhlmann KA, Iverson JB, anisms of hatchling freshwater turtles. Copeia editors. The conservation biology of freshwater 1993:435-440. turtles and tortoises. Chelonian Research Mono­ BROWNE CL, HECNAR SJ. 2005. Capture success of graphs 5:1-9. northern map turtles (Graptemys geographica) and BURY RB, GERMANO OJ, BURY GW. 2010. Comparison of other turtle species in basking vs. baited hoop the population structure and growth of the turtle traps. Herpetological Review 36:145-147. Actinemys marmorata in the Klamath-Siskiyou Ecore­ BURKE VJ, GIBBONS JW. 1995. Terrestrial buffer zones gion: Age, not size, matters. Copeia 2010:443-451. and wetland conservation: A case study of BURY RB, WHELAN JA. 1984. Ecology and management freshwater turtles in a Carolina bay. Conservation of the Bullfrog. Washington, DC: USDI Fish and Biology 9:1365-1369. Wildlife Service. Resource Publication 155. 23 p. BURKE VJ, LOVICH JE, GIBBONS JW. 2000. Conservation BURY RB, WOLFHEIM JH. 1973. Aggression in free­ of freshwater turtles. In: Klemens MW, editor. living pond turtles (Clemmys marmorata). BioSci­ Turtle conservation. Washington, DC: Smithsonian ence 23:659-662. Institution Press. p 156-179. BUSKIRK J. 2002. The Western Pond Turtle, Emys BURY RB. 1970. Clemmys marmorata. Catalogue of marmorata. Radiata 11:3-30. American Amphibians and Reptiles 100:1-3. CADI A, JOLY P. 2003. Competition for basking places BURY RB. 1972a. Habits and home range of the Pacific between the endangered European Pond Turtle pond turtle, Clemmys marmorata, in a stream com­ (Emys orbicularis galloitalica) and the introduced munity [dissertation]. Berkeley, CA: University of Red-eared Slider (Trachemys scripta elegans). Cana­ California. 205 p. dian Journal of Zoology 81:1392-1398. BURY RB. 1972b. The effects of diesel fuel on a stream CADI A, JOLY P. 2004. Impact of the introduction of the fauna. California Department of Fish and Game Red-eared Slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) on Bulletin 58:291-295. survival rates of the European Pond Turtle (Emys BURY RB. 1975. Conservation of nongame wildlife in orbicularis). Biodiversity and Conservation 13: California: A model programme. Biological Con­ 2511-2518. servation 7:199-210. CAGLE FR. 1939. A system of marking turtles for BURY RB. 1979. Population ecology of freshwater future identification. Copeia 1939:170-172. turtles. In: Harless M, Murdock H, editors. Turtles: CAGLE FR. 1946. The growth of the Slider Turtle, Perspectives and research. New York, NY: John Pseudemys scripta elegans. American Midland Nat­ Wiley and Sons. p 571-602. uralist 36:685-729. BURY RB. 1986. Feeding ecology of the turtle, Clemmys CAGLE FR. 1950. The life history of the Slider Turtle, marmorata. Journal of Herpetology 20:515-521. Pseudemys scripta troostii (Holbrook). Ecological BURY RB.1995. Western Pond Turtle: Clemmys marmor­ Monographs 20:31-54. ata (Baird and Girard). In: Storm RM, Leonard WP, CAGLE FR. 1953. An outline for the study of a reptile editors. Reptiles of Washington and Oregon. Seat­ life history. Tulane Studies in Zoology and Botany tle, WA: Seattle Audubon Society. p 34-37. 1:31-51. http:/ /www.herpconbio.org/volume_l/ BURY RB. 2008a. Do urban areas favor invasive turtles issue_1/Cagle_HCB.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2012. in the Pacific Northwest? In: Mitchell JC, Brown CAGLE FR, CHANEY AH. 1950. Turtle populations in RE, Bartholomew B, editors. Urban herpetology. Louisiana. American Midland Naturalist 43:383- Salt Lake City, UT: Society for the Study of 389. Amphibians and Reptiles. p 343-345. CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCY. 2003. Sacramento River BURY RB. 2008b. Amphibians in the Willamette Valley, Conservation Area Forum handbook. Sacramento, Oregon: Survival in a rapidly urbanizing and CA: Sacramento River Advisory Council. Depart­ developing region. In: Mitchell JC, Brown RE, ment of Water Resources. 238 p. http://www. Bartholomew B, editors. Urban herpetology. Salt sacramentoriver.org/ srcaf /index.php?id =handbook Lake City, UT: Society for the Study of Amphib­ Accessed 28 July 2012. ians and Reptiles. p 435-444. CARR A. 1952. Handbook of turtles: The turtles of the BURY RB. 2011. Modifications of traps to reduce United States, Canada, and Baja California. Ithaca, bycatch of freshwater turtles. Journal of Wildlife NY: Cornell University Press. 542 p. Management 75:3-5. CARROLL TE, EHRENFELD OW. 1978. Intermediate­ BURY RB, GERMANO OJ. 1998. Annual deposition of range homing in the Wood Turtle, Clemmys scute rings in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Year of the Turtle News No
    Year of the Turtle News No. 1 January 2011 Basking in the Wonder of Turtles www.YearoftheTurtle.org Welcome to 2011, the Wood Turtle, J.D. Kleopfer Bog Turtle, J.D. Willson Year of the Turtle! Turtle conservation groups in partnership with PARC have designated 2011 as the Year of the Turtle. The Chinese calendar declares 2011 as the Year of the Rabbit, and we are all familiar with the story of the “Tortoise and the Hare”. Today, there Raising Awareness for Turtle State of the Turtle Conservation is in fact a race in progress—a race to extinction, and turtles, unfortunately, Trouble for Turtles Our Natural Heritage of Turtles are emerging in the lead, ahead The fossil record shows us that While turtles (which include of birds, mammals, and even turtles, as we know them today, have tortoises) occur in fresh water, salt amphibians. The majority of turtle been on our planet since the Triassic water, and on land, their shells make threats are human-caused, which also Period, over 220 million years ago. them some of the most distinctive means that we can work together to Although they have persisted through animals on Earth. Turtles are so address turtle conservation issues many tumultuous periods of Earth’s unique that some scientists argue that and to help ensure the continued history, from glaciations to continental they should be in their own Class of survival of these important animals. shifts, they are now at the top of the vertebrates, Chelonia, separate from Throughout the year we will be raising list of species disappearing from the reptiles (such as lizards and snakes) awareness of the issues surrounding planet: 47.6% of turtle species are and other four-legged creatures.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTRODUCTION to Texas Turtles
    TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE AN INTRODUCTION TO Texas Turtles Mark Klym An Introduction to Texas Turtles Turtle, tortoise or terrapin? Many people get confused by these terms, often using them interchangeably. Texas has a single species of tortoise, the Texas tortoise (Gopherus berlanderi) and a single species of terrapin, the diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin). All of the remaining 28 species of the order Testudines found in Texas are called “turtles,” although some like the box turtles (Terrapene spp.) are highly terrestrial others are found only in marine (saltwater) settings. In some countries such as Great Britain or Australia, these terms are very specific and relate to the habit or habitat of the animal; in North America they are denoted using these definitions. Turtle: an aquatic or semi-aquatic animal with webbed feet. Tortoise: a terrestrial animal with clubbed feet, domed shell and generally inhabiting warmer regions. Whatever we call them, these animals are a unique tie to a period of earth’s history all but lost in the living world. Turtles are some of the oldest reptilian species on the earth, virtually unchanged in 200 million years or more! These slow-moving, tooth­ less, egg-laying creatures date back to the dinosaurs and still retain traits they used An Introduction to Texas Turtles | 1 to survive then. Although many turtles spend most of their lives in water, they are air-breathing animals and must come to the surface to breathe. If they spend all this time in water, why do we see them on logs, rocks and the shoreline so often? Unlike birds and mammals, turtles are ectothermic, or cold- blooded, meaning they rely on the temperature around them to regulate their body temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • In AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): Species in Red = Depleted to the Point They May Warrant Federal Endangered Species Act Listing
    Southern and Midwestern Turtle Species Affected by Commercial Harvest (in AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): species in red = depleted to the point they may warrant federal Endangered Species Act listing Common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) – AR, GA, IA, KY, MO, OH, OK, SC, TX Florida common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina osceola) - FL Southern painted turtle (Chrysemys dorsalis) – AR Western painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) – IA, MO, OH, OK Spotted turtle (Clemmys gutatta) - FL, GA, OH Florida chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia chrysea) – FL Western chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia miaria) – AR, FL, GA, KY, MO, OK, TN, TX Barbour’s map turtle (Graptemys barbouri) - FL, GA Cagle’s map turtle (Graptemys caglei) - TX Escambia map turtle (Graptemys ernsti) – FL Common map turtle (Graptemys geographica) – AR, GA, OH, OK Ouachita map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis) – AR, GA, OH, OK, TX Sabine map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis sabinensis) – TX False map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) – MO, OK, TX Mississippi map turtle (Graptemys pseuogeographica kohnii) – AR, TX Alabama map turtle (Graptemys pulchra) – GA Texas map turtle (Graptemys versa) - TX Striped mud turtle (Kinosternon baurii) – FL, GA, SC Yellow mud turtle (Kinosternon flavescens) – OK, TX Common mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum) – AR, FL, GA, OK, TX Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) – AR, FL, GA, LA, MO, TX Diamond-back terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) – FL, GA, LA, SC, TX River cooter (Pseudemys concinna) – AR, FL,
    [Show full text]
  • A Significant Range Extension for the Texas Map Turtle (Graptemys Versa) and the Inertia of an Incomplete Literature
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 9(2):334−341. Submitted: 3 January 2014; Accepted 15 February 2014; Published: 12 October 2014. A SIGNIFICANT RANGE EXTENSION FOR THE TEXAS MAP TURTLE (GRAPTEMYS VERSA) AND THE INERTIA OF AN INCOMPLETE LITERATURE PETER V. LINDEMAN Department of Biology and Health Services, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, 230 Scotland Road, Edinboro, PA 16444, USA, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—Defining the limits of a species’ geographic distribution is fundamental to research in biogeography, ecology, and conservation biology. The Texas Map Turtle, Graptemys versa, is endemic to the Colorado River drainage in central Texas but has been incorrectly reported by several sources to be restricted to the part of the Colorado drainage located on the Edwards Plateau, northwest of the fault lines of the Balcones Escarpment. I conducted visual surveys of basking turtles, vouchered with photographs, which demonstrate that even statements that the species occurs mainly above the Balcones Escarpment are incorrect. I observed higher numbers and higher relative abundances within basking turtle assemblages throughout the five counties downstream of the Edwards Plateau, in over 400 river km of the Colorado, and an abundant population was observed just 48 river km from the river’s mouth in coastal Matagorda County. Literature statements regarding restricted limits of freshwater turtle geographic ranges should be critically appraised for their accuracy. Surveys that are conducted beyond published range limits must also be detailed not just for new records but also for negative results, in order to enable future workers to properly evaluate statements about range limits. Key Words.—Balcones Escarpment; Colorado River; Edwards Plateau; range limits; relative abundance; Texas INTRODUCTION one or more range states (Lindeman 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Life History of the Texas Map Turtle (Graptemys Versa)
    Am. Midl. Nat. 153:378–388 Aspects of the Life History of the Texas Map Turtle (Graptemys versa) PETER V. LINDEMAN1 Department of Biology and Health Services, 150 Cooper Hall, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, Edinboro 16444 ABSTRACT.—The Texas map turtle (Graptemys versa) is endemic to the Colorado River drainage in southcentral Texas. A study of its life history was undertaken using data collected in 1998–2000 from a population in the South Llano River, southernmost tributary of the Colorado drainage, and data from museum specimens that had been collected from the South Llano River in 1949. Compared to congeners, G. versa is a small-bodied species. Its small body size is, predictably, linked to relatively small clutch size, small egg size, rapid growth toward asymptotic size and early maturation. As many as four clutches may be laid during an active season, although the effects of follicular atresia on clutch frequency are not known. Both clutch size and egg width were positively correlated with female body size, with the former relationship having a log-log slope significantly less than the expected value of 3, probably due to the latter relationship. Analyses were consistent with the hypothesis of anatomical constraint on egg size, with at least smaller females laying eggs that are of less than optimal size. No differences were found in body size or clutch size between 1949 and 1998–2000 despite a large- scale change in diet associated with invasion of the river by Asian clams (Corbicula sp.). However, body size is substantially reduced in the South Llano River compared to other sections of the Colorado drainage, a finding mimicked by at least one other turtle species in the drainage, Pseudemys texana.
    [Show full text]
  • Heinrich and Walsh (2019)
    THE BIG TURTLE YEAR LOOKING FOR WILD TURTLES IN WILD PLACES By George L. Heinrich and Timothy J. Walsh e like looking for wild turtles in wild We both liked turtles as kids, but now, many places. From the time George was in years later, we understand the important ecological Welementary school catching Wood roles they play. Some turtle species serve as indica- Turtles in southwestern Connecticut and Tim tors of environmental health, while others are clas- found his first pebble-sized Striped Mud Turtle sified as keystone species (those that play a vital at age 10 in a south Florida stream, we have both ecological role in a given habitat), umbrella spe- marveled at being in nature and searching for these cies (those whose conservation benefits the larger fascinating reptiles. As children, little did we know ecological community), or flagship species (iconic that our time spent exploring our neighborhood symbols of habitat conservation efforts). Perhaps woods would lead to rewarding careers in wildlife one of the best examples of the ecological signifi- conservation. Now we are both officers with the cance of turtles is the Gopher Tortoise, an imper- Florida Turtle Conservation Trust, an organization iled species that occurs in a six-state range within working to conserve Florida’s rich turtle diversity. the Southeastern Coastal Plain of the United States. In 2017 we created the opportunity of a Appropriately, the Gopher Tortoise was the first lifetime with the Trust’s conservation education species we found on day one of The Big Turtle Year. initiative: The Big Turtle Year, an ambitious plan to travel across the United States and back again SoutheaSt Regional highlightS trying to find as many species as we could.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations of the Ecology of Graptemys Versa and Pseudemys
    LINNAEUS FUND RESEARCH REPORTS 223 aged 5.6 eggs (range 4-9 eggs). Average egg dimensions for Che Ionian Conservation and Biology , 200 I, 4( I ):223-224 Cl 200 I by Chclonian Research Foundation 32 eggs obtained by oxytocin injection were 35.26 mm for length(range33.0-38.4mm)and20.87mmforwidth(range Investigation s of the Ecology of 18.4-22.2 mm). Graptemys versa and Pseudemys texana Mature male P. texana ranged from 78-162 mm PL in Southcentral Texas. (mean 122.2 mm, n =62). Female P. texana ranged from 95- Linnaeus Fund Research Report 234 mm PL (mean 178.8 mm, n = 54). The minimum size of gravid females was 213 mm PL and the mean size of females 1 this size or larger was 222.6 mm PL (n = 13). Clutch size of PETER V. LINDEMAN four females radio graphed in 1999 averaged 8.3 eggs (range 1Department of Biology and Health Services, 7-9eggs). Average egg dimensions for23 eggs obtained by 150 Cooper Hall, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, oxytocin injection were 42.19 mm for length (range 39.9- Edinboro, Pennsylvania, 16444 USA 44.7 mm) and 26.96 mm for width (range 26.0-27.6 mm). [Fax: 814-732-2593; E-mail: [email protected]] Diet.- Mollusks were abundant in the diet of 12 female G. versa from 1949 and 16 females captured in 1998- 99. Ernst et al. (1994) published an exhaustive compen­ Insects were abundant in the diet of male G. versa (which are dium of literature citations for the chelonian fauna of North much smaller than females, as in other Graptemys; Ernst et al., America.
    [Show full text]
  • Graptemys Barbouri)
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Barbour’s Map Turtle (Graptemys barbouri) Adult female Barbour’s map turtle, Chipola River, FL. (credit: Jonathan Mays, FWC) May 2017 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Atlanta, GA This document was prepared by Lisa Yarbrough (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Panama City, FL Ecological Services Field Office) with assistance from Dr. Sean Blomquist (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Panama City, FL Ecological Services Field Office) and Andreas Moshogianis (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Region 4/Southeast Regional Office). Valuable peer reviews of a draft of this document were provided by John Jensen (Georgia Department of Natural Resources), Jonathan Mays (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), Jim Godwin (Alabama Natural Heritage Program), Lora Smith (Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center, Georgia), Sean Sterrett (University of Massachusetts), and Marshall Williams (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Region 4/ Southeast Regional Office). We appreciate the time and effort of those dedicated to learning and implementing the SSA Framework, which resulted in a more robust assessment and final report. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Species status assessment report for the Barbour’s Map Turtle (Graptemys barbouri). May, 2017. Atlanta, GA. Barbour’s Map Turtle SSA Page ii 2017 Species Status Assessment Report For Barbour’s Map Turtle (Graptemys barbouri) Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment (SSA) reports the results of the comprehensive status review for the Barbour’s map turtle (Graptemys barbouri), documenting the species’ historical condition and providing estimates of current and future condition under a range of different scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4Th Edition December 2015
    Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4th Edition December 2015 Editor Chelonian TAG Steering Committee 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Mission ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Steering Committee Structure ........................................................................................................... 3 Officers, Steering Committee Members, and Advisors ..................................................................... 4 Taxonomic Scope ............................................................................................................................. 6 Space Analysis Space .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Current and Potential Holding Table Results ............................................................................. 8 Species Selection Process Process ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Decision Tree ........................................................................................................................... 13 Decision Tree Results .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 16Th Annual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles
    FORT WORTH, TEXAS 2018 16th Annual Symposium on the Conservation and Biology of Tortoises and Freshwater Turtles Joint Annual Meeting of the Turtle Survival Alliance and IUCN Tortoise & Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group Program and Abstracts August 12 - 15, 2018 Fort Worth, TX Additional Conference Support Provided by: Kristin Berry, John Iverson, Matt and Leigh Ann Frankel, Anders Rhodin, David Shapiro, Brett and Nancy Stearns, Reid Taylor, and Tim Gregory Support for the 2018 Behler Turtle Conservation Award Provided By: With additional support from: Deb Behler, George Meyer and Maria Semple, and Brett and Nancy Stearns Featured Presentations 2018 Conference Highlights Keynote: George L. Heinrich The Big Turtle Year: Celebrating Wild Turtles Across the United States George L. Heinrich is a field biologist and environmental educator with a specialty in Florida reptiles. He is an invited member of the IUCN Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Dr. Jeffrey Lovich served twice as co-chair of the Gopher Tortoise Council, and is the executive director of the Florida Where Have All the Turtles Turtle Conservation Trust (FTCT). In 2017 the Gone, and Why Does It Matter? FCTC initiated The Big Turtle Year, highlighting the diversity of chelonians across the American landscape, while promoting their conservation. Keynote: David Steen Using the Internet to Communicate Science, Reach New Audiences, and Advance Reptile Conservation David Steen is the Research Ecologist of the Georgia Sea Turtle Center on Jekyll Island, Georgia, the Executive Director of The Alongside Wildlife Foundation, and serves on the Board of Directors of the Wildlands Network. As a wildlife ecologist, conservation biologist, and public communicator, David studies how wildlife populations use Camila Ferrara landscapes and generates recommendations regarding how humans can develop, farm, restore, Turtle Sound Communication: and live on these landscapes at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Map Turtle
    Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of Emydidaethe IUCN/SSC — Tortoise Graptemys and Freshwater versa Turtle Specialist Group 093.1 A.G.J. Rhodin, P.C.H. Pritchard, P.P. van Dijk, R.A. Saumure, K.A. Buhlmann, J.B. Iverson, and R.A. Mittermeier, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs (ISSN 1088-7105) No. 5, doi:10.3854/crm.5.093.versa.v1.2016 © 2016 by Chelonian Research Foundation • Published 3 March 2016 Graptemys versa Stejneger 1925 – Texas Map Turtle PETER V. LINDEMAN1, JAMES N. STUART2, AND FLAVIUS C. KILLEBREW3 1Department of Biology and Health Services, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, Edinboro, Pennsylvania 16444 USA [[email protected]]; 2New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, Conservation Services Division, P.O. Box 25112, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87504 USA [[email protected]]; 3Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412 USA [[email protected]] SUMMARY. – The Texas Map Turtle, Graptemys versa (Family Emydidae), is a small freshwater turtle (carapace length to 204 mm in females, 116 mm in males) that is endemic to the Colorado River basin of Texas. The species exhibits pronounced sexual dimorphism in body size and large females are adapted to a highly molluscivorous diet. The species occurs mainly in lotic habitats but also inhabits reservoirs. Commercial and incidental collection of this turtle is possibly the most significant threat in some locations, although fragmentation and modification of its riverine habitat by dams are also of concern. It receives some protection under CITES and state regulations for commercial collection.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Petition to Protect Freshhwater Turtles Under CITES
    Sent Via Email and Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested August 15, 2011 Division of Scientific Authority U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 110 Arlington, VA 22203 [email protected] Phone: 703-358-1708 Fax: 703-358-2276 Re: Species Proposals for Consideration at CoP16 On behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity, I am writing to provide information and recommendations on freshwater turtle species that should be considered as candidates for U.S. proposals to amend Appendix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (“CITES”) at the upcoming sixteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (“CoP16”). See 76 Fed. Reg. 34746 (June 14, 2011) (requesting information and recommendations). The Center for Biological Diversity (“Center”) is a non-profit, public interest, conservation organization whose mission is to conserve imperiled native species and their habitat and to fulfill the continuing educational goals of its membership and the general public in the process. The United States is a key player in the international turtle trade with exports reaching millions of live turtles each year. Given the enormity of this commerce, the United States has a duty to take a leading role in promoting responsible commercial turtle trade. We urge the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) to propose at CoP16 that the following species be included in Appendix II: Alligator snapping turtle (Change Listing from Appendix III to Appendix II) Map turtles (Change Listing From Appendix III to Appendix II) Soft-shell turtles Spotted turtle Blanding’s turtle Diamondback terrapin In addition, we request that FWS list the common snapping turtle on Appendix III, although inclusion of a species in Appendix III is a unilateral decision that does not require a proposal to be brought forward to the Conference of Parties.
    [Show full text]