DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD. PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE FIFTY-THIRD CONGRESS. THIRD SESSION. SENATE. , New Hampshire-William E. Chandler and Jacob H. Gallinger. New Jersey-John R. McPherson and James Smith, jr. MONDAY, December 3, 1894. New York-Edward Murphy, jr. The first Monday of December being .the day prescribed by the No1'ih Carolina-Thomas J. Jarvis and Matt W. Ransom. Constitution of the United States for the annual meeting of Con­ North Dakota-Henry C. Hansbrough and William N;, Roach. faess, the third session of the Fifty-third Congress commenced this Ohio-Calvin S. Brice and John Sherman. Oregon-Joseph N. Dolph and John H. Mitchell. ,. atbe Senate assembled in its Chamber at the Capitol. Pennsylvania-James Donald Cameron and MatthewS. Quay. The VICE-PRESIDENT of the United States (Hon. AD4-1 E.' Rlwde Island-Nelson W. Aldrich. STEVENSON, of the State of Illinois), called the Senate to order at South Dakota-James H. Kyle and R. F. Pettigrew. 12 o'clock meridian. Tennessee-William B. Bate and Isham G. Harris. Texas-Richard Coke and Roger Q. Mills. PRAYER. / Rev. W. H. MILBURN, D. D., Chaplain to the Senate, offered the Vermont-Justin S. Morrill and Redfield Proctor. following prayer: . Vi1·ginia-Johrl. W. Daniel and Eppa Hunton. Almighty and most merciful Father, we render Thee humble Wasllington-Watson C. Squire. and hearty thanks that throv.gh the Tecess the angel of death has West Virginia-Johnson N. Camden and Charles J. Faulkner. touched no man connected with this body, and that the homes of Wisconsin-John L. Mitchell and William F. Vilas. all have been safe from his presence. Grant them still Thy heav­ The VICE-PRESIDENT: Seventy Senators have answered to enly benediction, guidance, guardianship, and defense. Prosper their names. ,A quorum is present. them in all their labors, giving them health, strength, and energy. NOTIFICATION TO THE HOUSE. Especially we commend to Thy heavenly goodness Thine hon­ Mr. RANSOM submitted the following resolution; which was ored servant the Vice-President and the members of his family. considered by. .unanimous consent, and agreed to: 1viost heartily we bless Thee that his home has been saved; and we Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of Representatives that a pray that his beloved daughter may speedily be restored to health quorum of the Senate is assembled, and that the Senate is ready to proceed and soundness, and that the family may be complete and shel­ Wbusiness. tered beneath Thy wing. NOTIFICATION TO THE PRESIDENT. Give to all the homes of this broad land the sense of Thy de­ Mr. HARRIS submitted the following resolution; which was fense and protection. Visit us with prosperity; grant us peace considered by unanimous consent, and agreed to: and plenty and the sense that the God of our fathers is still the Resolved, That a committee consisting of two Senators be appointed, to join refugeandthestronghold oftheirsons. We humblypray, through such committee as may be appointed by the House of Representatives, to Jesus Christ, our Saviour. wait upon the President of the United States and inform him. that a quorum of each House is assembled, and that Congress is ready. to receive any com­ SENATORS PRESENT. munication he may be pleased to make. Mr. SHERMAN. Mr. President, I ask for a call of the Senate. By unanimous consent, the Vice-President was authorized to The VICE-PRESIDENT. The secretary will call the roll. appoint the committee on the part of the Senate, and Mr. HARRIS The Secretary called the roll; and the following Senators were and Mr. MANDERSON were appointed. present: HOUR OF MEETING. From the State of- . Alabama-John T. Morgan and James L. Pugh. On motion of Mr. CQOKRELL, it was A1·kansas-James H. Berry and James K. Jones. Ordered, That the hour of the daily meeting of the Senate be 12 o'clock California-George C. Perkins. meridian until otherwise ordered. Colorado-Henry M. Teller and Edward 0. Wolcott. RECESS. Connecticut-Joseph R. Hawley and Orville ,H. Platt. Mr. COCKRELL (at 12 o'clock and 14 minutes p.m.). I move Delaware-George Gray and Anthony Higgins . that the Senate take a recess until half after 12 o'clock. Florida-Wilkinson Call and Samuel Pasco. The motion was agreed to; and at the expiration of the recess Georgia-John B. Gordon. (at 12 o'clock and 30 minutes p.m.) the Senate reassembled. Idaho-Fred T. Dubois and George L. Shoup. Illinois-Shelby M. Cullom and John M. Palmer. MESSAGE FROM THE HOUSE. Indiana-David Turpie and Daniel W. Voorhees. At 12 o'clock and 34 minutes p.m. Mr. JAMEs KERR, the Clerk Iowa-William B. Allison. of the House of Representatives, appeared below the bar of the Kansas-William A. Peffer. Senate and delivered the following message: Louisiana-Newton C. Blanchard and Donelson Caffery. Mr. Presiden~, I am directed by the House of Representatives Maine-William P. Fry and Eugene Hale. to inform the Senate that a quornm of the House of Representa­ Maryland-Charles H. Gibson and Arthur P. G-orman. tives has appeared, and that the- House is ready to proceed to busi- Massachusetts-George F. Hoar and Henry Cabot Lodge. ness. · Michigan-James McMillan. I am further directed to inform the Senate that the House has Mississippi-James Z. George and Anselm J. McLaurin. passed the following resolution: Missouri-Francis M. Cockrell and George G. Vest. Resolved, That a committee of three members be appointed on the part of Montana-Thomas C. Power. the House, to join such committee a.s may be appointed by the Senate, to wait upon the President of the United States and inform hun that a quorum of Nebraska-William V. Allen and Charles F. Manderson. the two Houses has assembled, and that Congress is ready to receive any com· Nevada-William M. Stewart. munication he may· have to make. 1 2 CONGRESSIONAL RECOR.D-SENATE. DECEMBER 3, ' I am also directed to inform the Sen~te that the Speaker has intention to terminate such arrangement on the 1st day of Jan­ appointed 111r. WILSO~ of West Virginia, Mr. HoLMAN, and Mr. uary, 1895, in the exercise of the right reserved in the agreement REED as the committee on the part of the House. between the two countries. I invite attention to the correspond- .ence between the Secretary of State and the Brazilian minister RECES~, .on this subject. l\fr. GORMAN (at 12 o'clock and 36 minutes p.m.). I move The commission organized under the convention which we had that the Senate take a receSj until half past 1 o'clock. entered into with Chile for the settlement of the outstanding The motion was agreed to; .and at the expiration of the recess claims of each Government against the other adjourned at the (at 1 o'clock and 30 minutes p. m.) the Senate reassembled. end of the period stipulated for its continuance, leaving undeter­ NOTIFICATION TO THE PRESIDENT. mined a number of .American cases which had been duly presented. These clarms are not barred, and negotiations are in progress tor Mr. !IA.RRIS and Mr. MANDERSON, the committee appointed in their submission to a new tribunal. - conjunction with a similar c?mmittee of the ;House of Representa­ Ob the 17th of March last a new treaty with China in further tives to wait upon the President of the Umted States, appeared regulation of emigration was signed · at Washington, and on below the bar, and . August 13 it received the sanction of the Senate. Ratification on Mr. HARRIS said: Mr. President, the committee appointed to the part of China and formal exchange are awaited to give effect wait upon the President of the United States and inform him that to this mutually beneficial convention. a quorum of .the two Houses .has. assembled and that Congress is A gratifying recognition of the uniform impartiality of this ready to receive any commumcation b,e may be pleased to mak~, country toward all foreign states was manifested by the coinci­ have performed that duty, and have-been requested by the PreSl­ dent request of the Chinese and Japanese Governments that the dent to say that he will immediately communicate to each House agents of the United States should, within proper limits, afford pro­ a message in writing. tection to the subjects of the other during the suspension of diplo­ PRESIDENT'S .ANNUAL MESSAGE. matic relations due to a state of war. This delicate office was ac­ At 1 o'clock and 32- minutes p. m. :Mr. 0. L. PRUDEN, one of cepted, and a.misapprehension which gave lise to the belief that the secretaries of the President of the United States, appeared in affording t~s kindly unofficial protection our agents would ex­ below the bar, and said: ercise the same authority which the withdrawn agents of the bel­ Mr. President, I am direqted by the President of the United ligerents had exercised was promptly corrected. .Although the States to deliver to the Senate a message in writing. war between China and Japan endangers no policy of the United The message was received from the secretary a:p.d handed to States, it deserves our greatest consideration, by reason of its dis­ the Vice-President. turbance of our growing commercial interests in the two coun­ The VICE-PRESIDENT. The Chair lays before the Senate the tries and the increased dangers which may result to our citizens message of the President of the United States, which the Secretary domiciled or sojourning in the interior of China. will read. Acting under a stipulation in our treaty with Korea (the first The Secretary (Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BEAN Eatepeaten
    The Weather To-Day: Generally Fair. SECTION 2— Pages 5 to 12. The News and Observer. VOL. XLVIII. NO. Id. RALEIGH. N. 0.. THURSDAY MO(USING, AUGUST 9.1900. PRICE FIVE CENTS. Leads all M©pth(Dar©lmaDaili®s inWews andGimilation Democrat who was associated with This year we have coming to us the might indicate that there were no regu- Ihe great leaders of the party in oth- people who now see. the dangerous lar troops engaged in the assault and er years, the Hon. David Turpie. It tendencies of the Republican party, that the rifle fire spoken of by Mr. Con- is although they did sec those ten- MESSAGE ger might be simply the sniping of dis- NOMINEES BRYAN the wish of every citizen of this SICK OF RANNA AND not A STERN Ktyte that this grand old man may dencies in 1896. We pointed out in gruntled irregulars who were engaged in yet be spared long- to serve bis coun- 1896 that if the Republican party guerilla tactics. try. You are in a city and in a State won it would have to give the trusts a Two dispatches were received during AND STEVENSON whose Democracy is true and is pre- HIS FREEBOOTERS chance to get back out of the people IS SENT Tfl CHINA Ahe day, one from Admiral Remey and pared to take its full part in the win- .the money they had contributed to the other from General Chaffee. Both I ning of the victory this year which the campaign fund. related to the fighting at Peit Sang.
    [Show full text]
  • Diary of William Owen from November 10, 1824 to April 20, 1825 Ed. by Joel W
    Library of Congress Diary of William Owen from November 10, 1824 to April 20, 1825 ed. by Joel W. Hiatt. INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY PUBLICATIONS. VOLUME IV. NUMBER 1. DIARY OF WILLIAM OWEN From November 10, 1824, to April 20, 1825 EDITED BY JOEL W. HIATT LC INDIANAPOLIS: THE BOBBS-MERRILL COMPANY. 1906. 601 25 Pat 14 F521 .I41 114026 08 iii PREFACE. 3 456 Part 2 8 The manuscript of this diary of William Owen has remained in the hands of his only daughter—formerly Mary Francis Owen, now Mrs. Joel W. Hiatt—for many years and its existence, save to a few, has been unknown. It is fragmentary in form. It is possibly the close of a journal which had been kept for years before. Its first sentence in the original is an incomplete one, showing that there was an antecedent portion. The picture of the times is so graphic than the Indiana Historical Society publishes it, on account of its historical value. Mr. Owen was 22 years old at the time of its composition. Diary of William Owen from November 10, 1824 to April 20, 1825 ed. by Joel W. Hiatt. http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbtn.14024 Library of Congress William Owen was the second of four sons born to Robert and Ann Caroline Owen, of Scotland. Their names were Robert Dale, William, David Dale, and Richard. Three of them, Robert Dale, David Dale and Richard are known where ever the sun shines on the world of literature or science. William, who, because of habit or for his own amusement, wrote this diary is not known to fame.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel D. Pratt: Senator and Commissioner
    Daniel D. Pratt: Senator and Commissioner Joseph E. Holliday* The election of Daniel D. Pratt, of Logansport, to the United States Senate in January, 1869, to succeed Thomas A. Hendricks had come after a bitter internal struggle within the ranks of the Republican members of the Indiana General Assembly. The struggle was precipitated by James Hughes, of Bloomington, who hoped to win the honor, but it also uncovered a personal feud between Lieutenant Governor Will E. Cumback, an early favorite for the seat, and Governor Conrad Baker. Personal rivalries threatened party harmony, and after several caucuses were unable to reach an agreement, Pratt was presented as a compromise candidate. He had been his party’s nominee for a Senate seat in 1863, but the Republicans were then the minority party in the legislature. With a majority in 1869, however, the Republicans were able to carry his election. Pratt’s reputation in the state was not based upon office-holding ; he had held no important state office, and his only legislative experience before he went to Washington in 1869 was service in two terms of the general assembly. It was his character, his leadership in the legal profession in northern Indiana, and his loyal service as a campaigner that earned for him the esteem of many in his party. Daniel D. Pratt‘s experience in the United States Senate began with the inauguration of Ulysses S. Grant in March, 1869. Presiding over the Senate was Schuyler Colfax, another Hoosier, who had just been inaugurated vice-president of the United States. During the administration of President Andrew Johnson, the government had been subjected to severe stress and strain between the legislative and executive branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Stjpreme Cotjet of the United States
    ; 1 STJPREME COTJET OF THE UNITED STATES. Monday, October 11, 1915. The court met pursuant to law. Present: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice McKenna, Mr. Justice Holmes, Mr. Justice Day, Mr. Justice Hughes, Mr. Justice Van Devanter, Mr. Justice Pitney, and Mr. Justice McReynolds, Adrian Riker, of Newark, N. J. ; Clarence C. Caldwell, of Howard, S. Dak. ; Alex. Simpson, of Jersey City, N. J. ; Robert Szold, of Chi- cago, 111. ; Leo F. Wormser, of Chicago, 111. ; William S. Haskell, of New York City, N. Y. ; Alfred D. Lind, of New York City ; Edward P. Holmes, of Lincoln, Nebr. George W. Berge, of Lincoln, Nebr.; ; Harold J. Adams, of Buffalo, N. Y. ; Morton S. Cressy, of Chicago, 111. Ralph D. Hurst, of Greensburg, Pa. ; James A. George, of Dead- ; wood, S. Dak.; Harry J. Dingeman, of Detroit, Mich.; Edwin P. Matthews, of Dayton, Ohio; James W. McCarter, of Washington, D. C. ; J. Sidney Condit, of Chicago, 111. ; Edw. W. Everett, of Chi- cago, 111. ; John C. Bane, of Pittsburg, Pa. ; Jeremiah F. Hoover, of Newark, N. J.; Colin S. Monteith, of Columbia, S. C; Frank G. Tompkins, of Columbia, S. C. ; Rush B. Johnson, of Chicago, 111.; of Alphonso C. Stewart, St. Louis, Mo. ; Wiley E. Jones, of Phoenix, Ariz.; Percy Sommer Benedict, of New Orleans, La.; John B. A. Wheltle, of Baltimore, Md. ; Burdette B. Webster, of Baltimore, Md. George W. Lindsay, of Baltimore, Md. George P. Decker, of ; Rochester, N. Y. ; Leslie C. Hardy, of Phoeniz, Ariz.; Martin A. Schenck, of New York City; and Charles K. Wheeler, of Paducah, Ky., were admitted to practice.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present
    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Manuscript Resources
    Young-Sanders Center for the Study of the War Between the States in Louisiana Microfilm Special Collections William T. Shinn Memorial Library ________________________________________________ Manuscript Resources On the War Between the States in Louisiana (Acknowledgement page 148) A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U |V| W | X | Y | Z Acknowledgement A Adams, Israel L. and Family Papers, Mss. 3637, 1813-1890 [Natchez, Adams County, Mississippi; also Arkansas] Location: Reel 1; Confederate Military Manuscripts, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Israel L. Adams (1801-1860) was a merchant and farmer of Natchez, Mississippi. He had six children, Harriet Catharine, Mary Eliza, Franklin Oliver “Frank,” Orlander Percival, Marey, and Laura. Frank Adams and his cousins, James and Theodore, fought in the Confederate Army. The Adams family was associated with the Zingline and Shupan families. This collection consists of 505 items and one manuscript volume. Items include correspondence, bills, receipts, and printed items. Most of the correspondence was written after 1860. Letters written by the Adams children and other members of the Adams, Zingline, and Shupan families describe the Civil War in Arkansas and Mississippi; battles at Baker’s Creek (Champion’s Hill), Atlanta, Georgia, and Vicksburg, Mississippi; local news; illnesses; and deaths. Letters from Orlander P. Adams describe student life at Mississippi College. Other items in the collection include slave bills of sale, Confederate currency, the amnesty oath of Lewis Zingline, home remedies, and papers related to German immigrants. Confederate States Army units documented include the 22nd Mississippi Regiment and the 126th Arkansas Infantry Regiment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Agrarian Protest in Louisiana, 1877-1900. William Ivy Hair Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1962 The Agrarian Protest in Louisiana, 1877-1900. William Ivy Hair Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Hair, William Ivy, "The Agrarian Protest in Louisiana, 1877-1900." (1962). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 722. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/722 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 62-3648 microfilmed exactly as received HAIR, William Ivy, 1930- THE AGRARIAN PROTEST IN LOUISIANA, 1877-1900. Louisiana State University, Ph.D., 1962 History, modern University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE AGRARIAN PROTEST IN LOUISIANA 1877-1900 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by William Ivy Hair B.A., Louisiana State University, 1952 M.A., Louisiana State University, 1953 January, 1962 ACKNOWLEDGMENT _ Many individuals have given generous aid and counsel during the course of my research and writing. A special debt should be acknowledged to Professors Burl Noggle, Edwin A. Davis, and John L. Loos of Louisiana State University, whose professional help and understanding proved vital to the completion of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Law Review Volume 52 2019 Number 1
    Indiana Law Review Volume 52 2019 Number 1 SYMPOSIUM HOOSIER BRIDESMAIDS MARGO M. LAMBERT* A. CHRISTOPHER BRYANT** Indiana proudly proclaims itself the “Crossroads of America.”1 While some northeast-corridor cynics might deride the boast as a paraphrase for flyover country, there is no denying the political significance of the Hoosier State’s geographical and cultural centrality. As one of Indiana’s most celebrated historians has observed, “[b]y the beginning of the twentieth century Indiana was often cited as the most typical of American states, perhaps because Hoosiers in this age of transition generally resisted radical change and were able usually to balance moderate change with due attention to the continuities of life and culture.”2 Throughout the Gilded Age, elections in the state were so closely fought that the winning party rarely claimed more than slimmest majority.3 At the time, Indiana tended to favor Republicans over Democrats, but the races were close with Democrats claiming their share of victories.4 During these years, voter turnout remained high in presidential elections, with Indiana ranging from the eightieth to the ninetieth percentiles, no doubt a product of the closeness of the contests. Such voter turnout substantially exceeded that typical of surrounding states.5 Hoosiers liked to politick. The state’s high voter participation may also have been, in some part, attributable to its relaxed voting laws for adult males during the nineteenth * Associate Professor of History, University of Cincinnati Blue Ash College. ** Rufus King Professor of Constitutional Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law. The authors, proud Hoosiers by birth and Buckeyes by professional opportunity, thank first and foremost Brad Boswell for entrusting us with the opportunity to open the March 29, 2018 Symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • Prominent and Progressive Americans
    PROMINENTND A PROGRESSIVE AMERICANS AN ENCYCLOPEDIA O F CONTEMPORANEOUS BIOGRAPHY COMPILED B Y MITCHELL C. HARRISON VOLUME I NEW Y ORK TRIBUNE 1902 THEEW N YORK public l h:::ary 2532861S ASTIMI. l .;-M':< AND TILI'EN ! -'.. VDAT.ON8 R 1 P43 I Copyright, 1 902, by Thb Tribune Association Thee D Vinne Prem CONTENTS PAGE Frederick T hompson Adams 1 John G iraud Agar 3 Charles H enry Aldrich 5 Russell A lexander Alger 7 Samuel W aters Allerton 10 Daniel P uller Appleton 15 John J acob Astor 17 Benjamin F rankldi Ayer 23 Henry C linton Backus 25 William T . Baker 29 Joseph C lark Baldwin 32 John R abick Bennett 34 Samuel A ustin Besson 36 H.. S Black 38 Frank S tuart Bond 40 Matthew C haloner Durfee Borden 42 Thomas M urphy Boyd 44 Alonzo N orman Burbank 46 Patrick C alhoun 48 Arthur J ohn Caton 53 Benjamin P ierce Cheney 55 Richard F loyd Clarke 58 Isaac H allowell Clothier 60 Samuel P omeroy Colt 65 Russell H ermann Conwell 67 Arthur C oppell 70 Charles C ounselman 72 Thomas C ruse 74 John C udahy 77 Marcus D aly 79 Chauncey M itchell Depew 82 Guy P helps Dodge 85 Thomas D olan 87 Loren N oxon Downs 97 Anthony J oseph Drexel 99 Harrison I rwln Drummond 102 CONTENTS PAGE John F airfield Dryden 105 Hipolito D umois 107 Charles W arren Fairbanks 109 Frederick T ysoe Fearey Ill John S cott Ferguson 113 Lucius G eorge Fisher 115 Charles F leischmann 118 Julius F leischmann 121 Charles N ewell Fowler ' 124 Joseph.
    [Show full text]
  • My First State Convention by ELIJAHA
    My First State Convention By ELIJAHA. GLADDEN A half-century ago (1884) six men who had been selected at a Scott County mass convention as delegates to the Demo- cratic state convention started for Indianapolis from Scotts- burg. They were Jefferson Gladden, Chas. W. Cruson, David M. Hughbanks, Harry Jewett, Mark Storen and Elijah A. Gladden. Of these all have passed away except Elijah A. Gladden, the writer of this reminiscence. On the train, we fell in with Jonas Howard, the nominee for Congress from the old third congressional district, S. M. Stockslager, Col. Tom Hanlon, John Benz and many other active Democrats. At Columbus we fell in with Green Smith, Lincoln Dixon, George Cooper and others. On arrival at Indi- anapolis, we were impressed at the size of the railway station, or rather its lack of size, it being no larger than the Scotts- burg depot. We went north on Illinois Street to Market Street and then east to the Circle which was a small park at that time, the monument being erected several years later. We went to the English Hotel where all six of us were assigned to a commodius room. After dinner we went out to see the city. The court house was the only large building to be found. The state house was built to the third story. The Fletcher building and the magnificent union station were both fairy dreams. We went about town on street cars drawn by mules, the mule cars not being supplanted by electric cars until 1893. We spent a pleasant night at the hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record. 865
    ··1875. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD. 865 The House divided; and the tellers reported-ayes_53, noes 92. By Mr. WHITEHEAD: The petition of citizens of Bedford County, So the House refused to adjourn. _ Virginia., for the establishment of certain post-routes, to the Commit· The Clerk then (at four o'clock and thirty minutes p.m.) resumed tee on the Post-Office and Post-Roads. the readin(J' of the Journal, but before concluding- By Mr. WHITTHORNE: The petition of Bradshaw Gra.nge, Patrons Mr. BUTLER, of Massachusetts. I ask that the reading of the of H nsbandry, Tennessee, for repeal of the tobacco tax, to the Com­ Journal be .suspended that I may move that the House do now ad- mittee on Ways and~ Means. jo~rn. • By Mr. WILLIAMS, of Massa-ehnsetts: The petition of H. 0. The motion was agreed to; and accordingly (at four o'clock and Houghton and others, of Cambridge, Massachusetts, for the restora­ forty minutes p.m.) the House adjourne~ until Monday next. tion of the 10 per cent. reduction of duties made in 1872, to the same committee. · . • PETITIONS, ETC. • The following memorials, petitions; and other papers were presented IN SENATE. at the Clerk's desk under the rules, and referred as stated: By Mr. ALBERT: The petition of Julia M. Colburn, a-dministra­ MoNDAY, February 1, _1875. trix, and Sophia E. Stimpson, for extension of a patent, to the Com­ The .VICE-PRESIDENT resumed the chair. mittee on Patents. Also, the petition of citizens of Elk Ridge, Howard County, Mary­ Prayer by the Chaplain, Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Careers of Six Hoosier Candidates of 1860 by H
    Careers of Six Hoosier Candidates of 1860 By H. S. K. BARTHOLOMEW In the election of 1860, there were six candidates for state offices, three on each ticket, who were destined later to figure conspicuously in national affairs and several of them in state affairs as well. Three of these were to fill the gov- ernor’s chair, five to serve in the United States Senate, one to become president of the United States, and one to be speak- er of the national House of Representatives. The three Re- publicans all of whom were elected in that memorable year, were Henry S. Lane, Oliver P. Morton and Benjamin Harri. son; the three Democrats were Thomas A. Hendricks, David Turpie and Michael C. Kerr. Henry S. Lane and Thomas A. Hendricks were the opposing candidates for governor, and Oliver P. Morton and David Turpie for lieutenant-governor. Benjamin Harrison and Michael C. Kerr ran against each other for reporter of the supreme court. Lane was elected governor succeeding Abram A. Hnm- mond, who was serving out the unexpired term of Ashbel P. Willard, the latter having died in office four months before the end of his term. A few days after Lane was inaugurated, he was elected to the United States Senate and resigned the governorship. Morton, who had been elected lieutenant-gov- ernor, succeeded him and served the full term of four years excepting the few days that had been served by Lane. He is always known in history as Indiana’s war governor. In 1864 he was elected to the governorship and served a little over two years of that term, when he resigned to go to the Senate as the successor of Lane.
    [Show full text]