DOCSLIB.ORG

Towards a Shared Print Collection in UK Research Libraries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Towards a Shared Print Collection in UK Research Libraries BIBLIOTHEK – Forschung und Praxis 2017; 41(3): 367–374 John MacColl* Towards A Shared Print Collection in UK Research Libraries https://doi.org/10.1515/bfp-2017-0048 tannien, um die ‚kollektive Sammlung‘ ihrer Mitgliedsbi- bliotheken zu analysieren und die Implikationen einer Abstract: This paper1 describes a recent project by Re- gemeinschaftlich verteilten Sammlung für die Gemein- search Libraries UK to analyse the ‘collective collection’ of schaft der Zukunft verstehen zu können. Die Arbeit von its member libraries, in order to understand the implica- OCLC Research, die die WorldCat-Datenbank der OCLC für tions for the community of a collectively-managed print ihre Analyse verwendet, wird diskutiert. Dabei werden resource in the future. It discusses the work of OCLC Re- sowohl fehlerhafter Datenabgleich und als auch dessen search in using the OCLC WorldCat database for this analy- Auswirkungen untersucht. Des Weiteren wird im Artikel sis, taking account of inaccurate data matching and its sorgfältig geprüft, wie die RLUK-Analyse durch Jisc lan- effects, and considers how the RLUK analysis feeds in to desweit genutzt wird, um eine ‚National Bibliographical broader work across the UK, led by Jisc, to create a UK Knowledgebase‘ zu entwerfen. Es werden die Ergebnisse National Bibliographic Knowledgebase. It compares the dieser Studie mit einer früheren, ähnlichen Studie über findings of the OCLC Research study to those of an earlier Forschungsbibliotheken in Nordamerika verglichen. Die similar analysis of the collective Association of Research Komplexität der Regierungs- und Forschungsförderung in Libraries collection in North America. The governance and Großbritannien wird beschrieben, die Herausforderungen funding complexity of the UK is described to account for eines nationalen Ansatzes für die ‚kollektive Sammlung‘ the challenges inherent in taking a national approach to werden aufgezeigt und die UKRR wird als ein Beispiel the problems of managing a collective collection. The UK eines gemeinschaftlich verteilten Ansatzes für Drucke be- Research Reserve is described as an example of a shared schrieben, dass in den letzten zehn Jahren nur erfolgreich print approach, thus far only applied to journals, which bei Zeitschriften funktionierte, da diese Initiative es den has over the last 10 years been a successful initiative for a beteiligten Bibliotheken ermöglichte, Zweitexemplare zu number of participant libraries in allowing them to free up entfernen. Überdies wird im regionalen Kontext beispiel- shelf space by removing duplicate holdings. The collective haft die Arbeit der ‚kollektiven Sammlung‘ am ‚White Rose collection work of a subset of RLUK, the White Rose Uni- University Konsortium‘ in Yorkshire, einem Teilprojekt der versity Consortium in Yorkshire, is described as an exem- wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken von Großbritannien, bei plar of an implementation of the findings of the RLUK-wide der Umsetzung der Forschungsergebnisse vorgestellt. study within a regional context. Schlüsselwörter: RLUK; Jisc; OCLC; WorldCat; COPAC; Keywords: RLUK; Jisc; OCLC; WorldCat; COPAC; Sconul; Sconul; UK National Bibliographic Knowledgebase; ‚kol- UK National Bibliographic Knowledgebase; ‘collective col- lektive Sammlung‘; HathiTrust; UK Research Reserve; un- lection’; HathiTrust; UK Research Reserve; union catalo- ion catalogues; White Rose University Consortium; Green- gues; White Rose University Consortium; GreenGlass; e- Glass; E-Books books Auf dem Weg zu einer verteilten Sammlung von Drucken 1 Introduction: Research Libraries in Forschungsbibliotheken in Großbritannien UK Zusammenfassung: Vorliegender Artikel beschreibt ein jüngeres Projekt der Forschungsbibliotheken von Großbri- Research Libraries UK (RLUK) is a membership organisa- tion that consists of 33 of the leading research university libraries, including those of Oxford and Cambridge, the 1 With thanks to my colleagues Janet Aucock (University of St An- four ancient Scottish universities (St Andrews, Glasgow, drews Library) and Rosemary Stenson (University of Glasgow Library) ‘ ’ for their comments and advice. Aberdeen and Edinburgh), the English red brick universi- ties (Birmingham, Bristol, Leeds, Manchester, Liverpool *Kontaktperson: John MacColl, [email protected] and Sheffield), and various of the Colleges of the Univer- Brought to you by | University of St Andrews Scotland Authenticated Download Date | 12/21/18 10:29 AM 368 John MacColl sity of London. It also includes the UK’s three national (2014-17) has as a theme: a collective approach: re-shaping libraries (the British Library, the National Library of Scot- the modern research library collection, and under that the land and the National Library of Wales), and – perhaps objective to work towards a shared approach to the man- oddly – Trinity College Dublin (which is a ‘legal deposit’ agement of print, manuscript and archive collections library under the terms of UK law). There are also some across RLUK. A related objective was coordinate and ratio- newer university members, and the Wellcome Trust Li- nalise digital collections across the UK. brary, a specialised biomedical library. The fit was also appropriate more generally. Jisc com- RLUK has for many years maintained its own catalo- missioned a study which appeared in 2015 to examine the gue (Copac), which aggregates records from its member implications of pursuing specific bibliographic data strate- libraries and some 60 or so other research collections gies. This work was undertaken as part of a set of activity across the UK and Ireland. The service is hosted and man- within Jisc as it adjusted its focus and shape for the future, aged by Jisc, on behalf of RLUK. It currently contains some in the light of reduced government funding. The report 40 m records. As an adjunct service, RLUK has its own recommended that Jisc should focus on ensuring that bib- record supply database. This record retrieval service pro- liographic data services are available and building rele- vides records in MARC21 format and is open to any non- vant partnerships, rather than continuing with the rela- profit organisation. tively labour-intensive task of operating Copac. In its paper summarising the report, it was stated quite boldly that: “The primary focus of future effort should be on 2 Evaluation of UK bibliographic supporting UK academic libraries with collections man- agement. Resource discovery and records delivery are of infrastructure secondary importance”.1 Both Copac and the RLUK Database were subject to review in 2015-16. The aims of the review, agreed jointly between 3 Charge to OCLC Research RLUK, Jisc, SCONUL (the Society for College, National & University libraries) and the British Library were: RLUK commissioned OCLC Research to use the WorldCat ‒ To help inform shared collection management deci- database in order to provide the RLUK community with sions across RLUK. intelligence on its bibliographic profile. OCLC Research ‒ To recognise the implications of an OCLC Research was asked to: analysis of aggregate bibliographic holdings across ‒ Explore the characteristics of the aggregate RLUK bib- RLUK, and understand the preservation fragilities in liographic resource in the context of members’ strate- our collective aggregation. gic priorities. ‒ To compare the RLUK system-wide aggregation with a ‒ Use WorldCat to obtain a multi-scalar perspective on recently completed study of ARL holdings, also con- the RLUK profile, at local, group and global levels. ducted by OCLC Research. ‒ Complement and advance recent work it had done on ‒ To link up with other UK-wide collection management the ‘collective collection’ and shared print.2 work (Jisc’s ’National Monograph Strategy’ and the UK ‒ Refine its analysis via consultation with an RLUK Ad- Research Reserve). visory Group that was established to work with the ‒ To move from piecemeal collection analysis based on OCLC Research team. patchy holdings metadata in WorldCat, to system- wide analysis. Fundamental to the analyses that OCLC Research would ‒ To provide a step towards identifying the ‘long tail’ of conduct was the currency of the data with which they were publications which may have no formal preservation working. As a catalogue of catalogues, WorldCat has great arrangements, and to consider our collective responsi- potential to be used for bibliographic analysis of this type – bility for its preservation. RLUK’s report led to Jisc issuing a tender for what it called 1 Bibliographic data services and the National Monographic Strat- – a ‘National Bibliographic Knowledgebase’ service in the egy next steps (2015). 2 See for example Understanding the Collective Collection: Towards a autumn of 2016. System-wide Perspective on Library Print Collections (2013) and Stew- All of this activity fitted well with the RLUK Strategy – ardship of the Evolving Scholarly Record: From the Invisible Hand to which is currently being refreshed. The previous strategy Conscious Coordination (2015). Brought to you by | University of St Andrews Scotland Authenticated Download Date | 12/21/18 10:29 AM Towards A Shared Print Collection in UK Research Libraries 369 but the picture it provides is only as accurate as the data 71 % of overall distinct works. In contrast, the same study within it. In the UK, the convention for a long period of performed on the Association of Research Libraries group time has been that most libraries upload their own catalo- only accounted for 49 % of that total collective resource. gue records to WorldCat
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supporting Research in Area Studies: a Guide for Academic Libraries Lesley Pitman Librarian and Director of Information Services
    Pitman, L; (2015) Supporting Research in Area Studies: a guide for academic libraries. (First ed.). Chandos Publishing: Oxford (In press). Downloaded from UCL Discovery: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/ 1469352 Supporting research in area studies: a guide for academic libraries Lesley Pitman Librarian and Director of Information Services, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies Library, London, UK Contents Introduction 1. Area studies: the academic landscape 2. Area studies librarianship 3. Area studies collections 1: acquisitions 4. Area studies collections 2: collection management 5. Digital resources for area studies 6. Resource Discovery and Systems: barriers to access in area studies 7. Library support and services for area studies researchers Conclusion References Appendix: List of useful organizations for area studies librarians Introduction In this book I aim to set out the ways in which academic libraries can best support a diverse and challenging community of academic researchers; those working in area studies. In drawing on the latest thinking on research support as part of academic librarianship, I have attempted to show how the distinctive nature of area studies research and area studies librarianship might provide useful examples of good practice when considering how best to support our increasingly international universities. The book is aimed at students studying for a professional qualification, library staff charged with supporting an area studies centre or department, and senior library management considering the implications of supporting research that transcends boundaries between individual countries, disciplines and languages. Although it does not address directly the current debate around the role of subject support in an academic library, it does aim to keep the practical needs and experiences of researchers in the foreground at all times, while bearing in mind the rapidly changing environment for academic publishing and scholarly communication.
    [Show full text]
  • IMAGINE2030 a Library for Our Third Century the University of Manchester Library Is One of the Acknowledged Great Libraries of the World
    The University of Manchester Library National Research Library in the North IMAGINE2030 A Library for Our Third Century The University of Manchester Library is one of the acknowledged great libraries of the world. Originating in 1824, The University of Imagine2030 is one of the most A LIBRARY FOR OUR Manchester Library is the third largest research library system in the significant bodies of activity United Kingdom and sits at the heart of the country’s largest undertaken by The University single-site University. With more than ten million items it is the of Manchester Library in its largest non-legal deposit library, the only National Research Library in long history. As The University the north of England and holds the most extensive digital collections of Manchester moves into its THIRD CENTURY of any academic library in the United Kingdom. third century during the course of Imagine2030, the University Imagine2030 is The University of Manchester Library’s vision and priorities for will reimagine and confirm its the next period of its development. It is intended to engage and inform our status as the home of one of the many communities of researchers, students, visiting scholars, staff and public world’s great libraries. visitors. An operational plan underpins Imagine2030 and delivers our ambitions Professor Christopher Pressler for the Library estates plan, internationalisation, Equality, Diversity and John Rylands University Librarian Inclusion, a collections-led core business, an ideas-led workforce and on our & Director of The University of critical role in supporting the University’s core goals of Research and Discovery, Manchester Library Teaching and Learning and Social Responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • A National Monograph Strategy Roadmap
    A National Monograph Strategy Roadmap 4 September 2014 Author Ben Showers “A National Monograph Strategy Roadmap ” Author Ben Showers © Jisc Published under the CC BY 2.0 licence creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Contents Introduction 4 About this roadmap 4 The Vision 5 Context 6 Background 6 The Monographs Landscape 7 Collection Management and Strategy 7 The Policy Landscape 9 Web-based tools, services and infrastructure 10 In conclusion 10 Aim 11 Benefits 12 Problems 13 The Solution 14 National Monograph Vision 14 The Roadmap 16 1. A National Monograph Knowledgebase 17 2. Measuring the Impact of Monographs 18 3. A Shared Monograph Publishing Platform 19 4. New Monograph Business Models 20 5. A National Digitisation Strategy 21 6. A National License for Monographs 22 7. A Systemic Changes Think Tank 23 The call to action 24 Acknowledgements 25 A National Monograph Strategy Roadmap 4 Introduction Introduction The scholarly monograph - the book-length result of dedicated research - finds itself in a precarious position. As library budgets diminish, and are further squeezed by the increasing costs of journals, there is little left for purchasing monographs. What budget remains is often spent on duplicates of books This roadmap describes a series of practical, doable ideas; that are available at other academic libraries. More unusual ideas that will evolve and respond to changing contexts, or important local collections risk being side lined or user needs and the results of prototypes and pilots. Over undervalued. the next few months the project will begin to develop plans for these potential pilots and prototypes. While the monograph remains a critical part of the scholarly dialogue, especially within the humanities and social But all of this will remain ideas without action: action by sciences, sales are falling and as a result researchers find it us, by you and by anyone who has a stake in, or an increasingly difficult to publish their book-length research.
    [Show full text]
  • Strength in Numbers: the Research Libraries UK (RLUK) Collective Collection
    Strength in Numbers The Research Libraries UK (RLUK) Collective Collection Constance Malpas and Brian Lavoie Strength in Numbers: The Research Libraries UK (RLUK) Collective Collection Constance Malpas Research Scientist Brian Lavoie Research Scientist © 2016 OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ June 2016 OCLC Research Dublin, Ohio 43017 USA www.oclc.org ISBN: 978-1-55653-515-4 OCLC Control Number: 950534748 Please direct correspondence to: Constance Malpas Research Scientist [email protected] Suggested citation: Malpas, Constance, and Brian Lavoie. 2016. Strength in Numbers: The Research Libraries UK (RLUK) Collective Collection. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2016/oclcresearch-strength-in-numbers-rluk- collective-collection-2016-a4.pdf. Cover image: Map depicting the approximate locations of the 37 institutions comprising the RLUK membership. The ten RLUK members located in the London area are represented by a single large dot. FOREWORD Researchers and students all over the world benefit from the collections held by RLUK member libraries. These collections have grown over centuries: through purchases and donations, strategic subject building and happy accident, through collaboration and serendipity, all supported by a robust legal deposit system. We have exceptional individual collections, but we are becoming increasingly interested in the total collection within the UK. We are asking strategic questions about the preservation and storage of print books, the best use of library space, the range and effectiveness of digital surrogacy, and the nature of collecting. Our colleagues at OCLC have harnessed the unique possibilities offered by WorldCat to provide us with a window into what they have coined the “collective collection” across RLUK institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Leeds University Library Annual Report 2018-19
    BE INSPIRED THE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ANNUAL 18REPORT 19 CONTENTS Librarian’s introduction 03 Harnessing technology to transform services 04 Outstanding student opportunities for skills development 07 Students at the heart of our library 10 Helping to increase the impact of research 15 Collections driving scholarship 19 Engaging with communities beyond campus 23 Developing a more effective organisation 26 Esteem factors 30 Statistics 2018–2019 33 Visit our website: library.leeds.ac.uk Librarian’s introduction FROM THE LIBRARIAN The stand-out event of the academic year 2018–19 has been introducing a new library management system, Alma. It was unveiled in July but its preparation dominated work for the previous twelve months. Library management systems are now We have improved our support for research absolutely essential to the operation of funding applications through improved libraries. The library catalogue still sits at literature searching. We continue to find its heart, providing information about the innovative ways to create opportunities books, databases, academic journals and for scholarship within our collections. other electronic resources upon which staff Our galleries have staged a series of thought- and students depend for their learning and provoking and visually stunning exhibitions. 3 research. But modern systems do much, Dr Stella Butler, much more than this. They enable readers We want the Library to be a supportive and University Librarian to borrow from our rich collections or stimulating place to work. Our preparation for and Keeper of download the article or resource they need; the Investors in People standard enabled us to the Brotherton library staff order and purchase books and stand-back and consider how we communicate Collection electronic resources through the system; and collaborate, and examine the values we the library system is also central to how we adhere to and promote.
    [Show full text]
  • University Library Annual Report 2011-2012
    University Library Annual Report 2011-2012 Foreword Academic Year 2011-12 brought with it another period of turbulent change – most of it positive – for the University Library. The major and very tangible difference for our Library users was the arrival of a new and contemporary décor in Level 2 of the Main Library – the entrance level. All of a sudden, a building which had seemed unfortunately trapped in the 1970s was jolted forwards to take on the features of an early 21st century academic library, with a strong emphasis on meeting the expectations and improving the experience of our sophisticated student users. It did so by introducing an increased provision of self-service facilities, a café, contemporary furnishings and fittings and a recognition of the need to provide zones within the building for different types of library user behaviour: a ‘general zone’ on Level 2, where we permit mobile phone use, conversation, and food and drink consumption (within limits), and silent zones on our two upper levels. Space for 150 additional study spaces on Level 2 also helped to cope with the constantly growing demand from our student community, and a raised floor permitted power and data points to populate the space sufficient to cope with the strain placed on it by ubiquitous student mobile devices and the desire for instant connectivity. Even long-belated change can produce nostalgia, however, and there was a degree of regret expressed by some users over the fact that most Library staff were now removed behind partition walls (or downstairs to Level 1) to open out the optimal space to reader use and new facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 and the Digital Shift in Action
    l Covid-19 and the digital shift in action Matt Greenhall Deputy Executive Director, RLUK COVID-19 AND THE DIGITAL SHIFT IN ACTION © 2020 Research Libraries UK Published: July 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Suggested citation: Greenhall, M. (2020). Covid-19 and the digital shift in action, RLUK Report Contact the author: RLUK Room 257, Senate House Malet Street London WC1E 7HU [email protected] COVID-19 AND THE DIGITAL SHIFT IN ACTION CONTENTS Overview: Covid-19 and the digital shift in action 4 Organisational context 7 Skills and leadership 13 Scholarship and collections 17 Physical and digital spaces 22 Moving forward 26 Further reading and useful links 32 Appendices 33 Appendix I List of contributing RLUK members 33 Appendix II Overview of interview process 34 3 COVID-19 AND THE DIGITAL SHIFT IN ACTION COVID-19 AND THE DIGITAL SHIFT IN ACTION This report provides an overview of the experiences of RLUK members in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. In particular, it explores the extent to which the period of the Covid-19 pandemic represented the ‘digital shift in action’ amongst research library services, operations, and collections. This report forms both part of RLUK’s wider work surrounding the experience of its members during the Covid-19 crisis and its activities around the digital shift. OVERVIEW: THE DIGITAL SHIFT The digital shift is used as an umbrella term for the analogue-digital transition of many library services, operations, collections, and audience interactions.1 This work around the digital shift forms part of RLUK’s current strategy, Reshaping Scholarship, and very broadly, relates to the impact of digital technology on the research library: Collections: reflecting the increasing volume of digital collections within research libraries, whether as born-digital archives, digitised content, data, research outputs contained within repositories, or electronic books and journals (e-print).
    [Show full text]
  • MARC Codes for Organizations in the UK and Its Dependencies
    MARC codes for organizations in the UK and its dependencies Last updated: 02 September 2019 Current MARC codes for organizations This table lists current MARC codes for organizations in the UK and its dependencies. It is arranged in alphabetical order by organization name. Active MARC Codes MARC code Normalised form Name Variant or Address Town/City Postcode previous name(s) UkLHu uklhu A. J. Hurley, Ltd. Hurley, Ltd. 119-121 Charlemont London SW17 Rd. UK-AbCCL ukabccl Aberdeen City Council Library Aberdeen City Central Library, Aberdeen AB25 1GW and Information Service Libraries; Rosemount Viaduct Aberdeen Library & Information Services StAbUL stabul Aberdeen University, Library University of Bedford Road Aberdeen AB24 3AA Aberdeen StOlALI stolali Aberdeenshire Libraries Aberdeenshire Meldrum Meg Way Oldmeldrum AB51 0GN Library and Information Service; ALIS WlAbUW wlabuw Aberystwyth University Prifysgol Hugh Owen Library, Aberystwyth SY23 3DZ Aberystwyth, AU; Penglais Campus University of Wales, Aberystwyth; Prifysgol Cymru, Aberystwyth UK-LoALL ukloall Academic Library Limited 20 Cambridge Dr. London SE12 8AJ UkAc ukac Accrington Public Library Accrington UkMbAM-D ukmbamd Adam Matthew Digital Ltd Pelham House, London Malborough SN8 2AA Road UkMbAM ukmbam Adam Matthew Publications Pelham House, London Malborough SN8 2AA Ltd Road StEdAL stedal Advocates Library Parliament House Edinburgh EH1 1RF UkLoJL uklojl Aga Khan Library IIS-ISMC Joint 10 Handyside Street London N1C 4DN Library; Library of the Institute of Ismaili Studies and the Institute for the Study of Muslim Civilisations (Aga Khan University) StEdALDL stedaldl Agency for the Legal Deposit ALDL 33, Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SL Libraries UkLiAHC ukliahc Alder Hey Children’s NHS FT Education Centre, Liverpool L12 2AP Eaton Road UkLAC uklac American College in London, 110 Marylebone High London W1M 3DB Library St.
    [Show full text]
  • Uk Open Access Case Study
    NOVEMBER 17, 2014 UK OPEN ACCESS CASE STUDY PASTEUR4OA PROJECT JISC Mafalda Picarra UK Open Access Case Study UK Open Access Case Study Summary Recent Open Access (OA) policy developments in the United Kingdom (UK) have caused stakeholders such as universities and academic libraries to have to consider how to adapt to distinct funders OA policies and to ensure compliance with those policies. Following an independent study on ‘how to expand access to research publications’, also referred to as the Finch Report, the UK Government adopted a new OA policy and the Research Councils UK (RCUK) revised their OA policy. The newly adopted OA policies require research findings to be made OA through publication in open access or hybrid journals (Gold OA). More recently, the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) announced that its OA policy for the next Research Evaluation Framework (REF) – the system that assesses UK universities research – will require the deposit of research findings in institutional or subject repositories (Green OA). By and large, the two distinct paths being currently promoted by the UK Government and RCUK (Gold OA) and the Funding Councils (Green OA) require that continued efforts be made to ensure that advice and support are provided to universities, academic libraries and researchers. They also require that coordinated efforts endure so that progress towards making research findings freely available online continues. Despite the distinct OA policies adopted by policymakers and national research funders, the UK’s movement towards OA has been a result of stakeholders coordinated efforts and is considered a case of good practice.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Rare Book Librarianship and Historical Bibliography
    9 Rare book librarianship and historical bibliography K. E. Attar Introduction The rare books world saw considerable activity in the years 2011–2015, and, especially through Research Libraries UK (RLUK) initiatives, enjoyed a high profile. Particular emphasis was on digitization, rendering texts available out- side library walls. Concurrently, libraries plunged themselves into ‘engage- ment’ (the buzzword supplanting ‘promotion’ and ‘outreach’ as a traditional core activity of rare book librarianship, and consciously including ‘public engagement’ beyond a library’s main stakeholders), whereby the celebration of printed objects through exhibitions, publications, and teaching emphasized the continued value of the printed artefact. Such activity, alongside acquisi- tions, concern at disposals, and projects to house special collections in new environments, conveyed a clear and triumphant message amidst challenges that rare books and special collections matter. RLUK initiatives A strand on ‘promoting unique and distinctive collections’ within RLUK strategy 2011–2014 gave special collections particular prominence. The purpose was to maximize ‘the potential of these collections in all formats held by RLUK members’, including ‘activity on public engagement, fundraising, promotion, resource discovery and delivery, and digitisation, and … encom- pass[ing] value, impact and staff skills’.1 The main resulting report was ‘Unique and distinctive collections: opportunities for research libraries’, which defined unique and distinctive collections (‘UDCs’),
    [Show full text]
  • Collection Management at Bristol University Library Library Services at the University of Bristol Are Committed to Preserving Ou
    Collection Management at Bristol University Library Library Services at the University of Bristol are committed to preserving our heritage legacy collections and participating actively within an emerging national collection management framework. We also acknowledge the pressures on our library estate as we both respond flexibly to space requirements across the campus, and to further enhance the student experience. This document explains the rationale used to inform how Library Services manage our print collections. Background The relationship between library stock and the space it occupies is dynamic and requires careful management, both day to day and strategically. Student growth has led to significant pressure on library space and there is a need to redefine the nature of spaces within library buildings. As increasing space and financial demands are made on academic libraries, it is no longer practical, or economically possible, to adopt a policy of retaining the last copy of every title on the basis of possible future need. At the national level academic research libraries are working towards the collective management of their low-use print collections. This important work has the potential to transform the definition of a ‘research library’, and to create a more open, reciprocal and cooperative community within Research Libraries UK (RLUK), of which Bristol is a member. Bristol is actively engaged in these discussions, which encompass potential service delivery models, data management models and tools, and working cooperatively to define a shared agenda across institutions. Bristol and the UK Research Reserve (UKRR) Library Services are a member of UKRR. This membership allows us to benefit from participation in a distributed national research collection, and to withdraw lesser-used print journal runs when titles are already held in UKRR, secure in the knowledge that they remain available both locally and nationally.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Academic and Research Libraries As Active Participants and Leaders in the Production of Scholarly Research
    The role of academic and research libraries as active participants and leaders in the production of scholarly research A report on an RLUK scoping study About this report This report presents the findings of a scoping study commissioned by RLUK in partnership with AHRC to investigate the role of library staff as partners and leaders in the initiation, production, and dissemination of academic and scholarly research. June 2021 Acknowledgements l Evidence Base and Associates would like to thank the following: l All the research participants who provided valuable feedback. l All those individuals who helped distribute and promote the survey. l RLUK and the Scoping Study Steering Group for their guidance and support throughout namely: James Baker, Senior Lecturer in Digital History and Archives, University of Sussex Tao Tao Chang, Head of Infrastructure, Arts and Humanities Research Council Lucie Connors, Senior Investment Manager, Skills team, Arts and Humanities Research Council Joanna Dunster, Senior Investment Manager, Heritage and International Research Infrastructures, Arts and Humanities Research Council. Jessica Gardner, University Librarian, University of Cambridge and RLUK Chair Matt Greenhall, Deputy Executive Director, RLUK Masud Khokhar, University Librarian and Keeper of the Brotherton Collection, University of Leeds and RLUK Vice Chair Joseph Marshall, Associate Director of Collections Management, National Library of Scotland David Prosser, Executive Director, RLUK Claire Warwick, Professor of Digital Humanities, University
    [Show full text]