DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on the High Hedges Bill (NIA 15/09) Membership and Powers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on the High Hedges Bill (NIA 15/09) Membership and Powers Committee for the Environment Report on the High Hedges Bill (NIA 15/09) Together with the Minutes of Proceedings, Minutes of Evidence and Written Submissions Relating to the Report Ordered by The Committee for the Environment to be printed 16 December 2010 Report: NIA 07/10/11R Committee for the Environment Session 2010/2011 Third Report Membership and Powers The Committee for the Environment is a Statutory Departmental Committee established in accordance with paragraphs 8 and 9 of the Belfast Agreement, section 29 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998 and under Standing Order 48. The Committee has power to: - • Consider and advise on Departmental budgets and annual plans in the context of the overall budget allocation; • Consider relevant secondary legislation and take the Committee stage of primary legislation; • Call for persons and papers; • Initiate inquires and make reports; and • Consider and advise on any matters brought to the Committee by the Minister of the Environment The Committee has 11 members including a Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson and a quorum of 5. The membership of the Committee since 9 May 2007 has been as follows: Mr Cathal Boylan (Chairperson) 9 Mr Thomas Buchanan 7, 8, 13 Mr Trevor Clarke 15 Mr Willie Clarke 14 Mr John Dallat 5 Mr Danny Kinahan 3, 4 Mr Patsy McGlone (Deputy Chairperson) 6, 9, 10, 12 Mr Alastair Ross 1 Mr George Savage 2, 16 Mr Peter Weir Mr Brian Wilson 11 1 On 21 January 2008, Alastair Ross was appointed as a Member and Mr Alex Maskey ceased to be a Member. 2 On 15 September 2008 Mr Roy Beggs replaced Mr Sam Gardiner. 3 On 29 September 2008 Mr David McClarty replaced Mr Billy Armstrong. 4 On 22 June 2009 Mr Danny Kinahan replaced Mr David McClarty. 5 On 29 June 2009 Mr John Dallat replaced Mr Tommy Gallagher. 6 On 3 July 2009 Mrs Dolores Kelly replaced Mr Patsy McGlone as Chairperson. 7 On 14 September 2009 Mr Adrian McQuillan replaced Mr Trevor Clarke. 8 On 1 February 2010 Jonathan Bell replaced Mr Adrian McQuillan. 9 On 12 April 2010 Mr Cathal Boylan was appointed as Chairperson and Mrs Dolores Kelly ceased to be a Member. 10 On 12 April 2010 Mr Dominic Bradley was appointed as Deputy Chairperson. 11 On 13 April 2010 Mr Brian Wilson was appointed as a Member and Mr David Ford ceased to be a Member. 12 On 21 May 2010 Mr Patsy McGlone replaced Mr Dominic Bradley as Deputy Chairperson 13 On 13th September 2010 Mr Thomas Buchanan replaced Mr Jonathan Bell 14 On 13th September 2010 Mr Willie Clarke replaced Mr Daithi McKay 15 On 13th September 2010 Mr Trevor Clarke replaced Mr Ian McCrea 16 On 1 November 2010 Mr George Savage replaced Mr Roy Beggs Table of Contents Report Executive summary Recommendations 6 Introduction 7 Consideration of the Bill by the Committee 8 Key issues 11 Clause by clause consideration of the Bill 20 Appendix 1 Minutes of Proceedings 25 Appendix 2 Minutes of Evidence 43 Appendix 3 Written Submissions 139 Appendix 4 List of Witnesses 175 Appendix 5 Research papers requested by the Committee 179 Appendix 6 Other papers submitted to the Committee 223 Executive Summary Purpose This report sets out the Committee for the Environment's consideration of the High Hedges Bill. Members sought a balanced range of views as part of their deliberations on the High Hedges Bill and requested evidence from interested organisations and individuals as well as from the Department of the Environment. The Committee made four recommendations having identified the following key issues. Key issues - • Delegated powers of the Bill • Extending the Bill beyond domestic properties (Clause 1) • Definition of 'reasonable enjoyment' (Clause 1) • Protecting established forests and woodland and ancient trees (Clause 2) • Assessing a problem hedge (Clause 2) • Scope of the Bill (Clause 2) • Fees for complaints (Clause 3) • Requiring Departmental regulations to set a cap on fees (Clause 3) • Mediation (Clause 3) • Fixed penalties (Clauses 3 and 9) • Hedge removal (Clause 4) • Protecting biodiversity in remedial notices (Clause 4) • Appeals process (Clause 6) • Powers of entry (Clause 8) • Action by council (Clause 11) • Vacant land (General) • Guidance (General) • Training (General) • Hedges owned by local authorities (General) Delegated powers of the Bill The Committee sought advice from the Examiner of Statutory Rules in relation to the delegated powers within the Bill. The Examiner advised that the Bill contained several powers to make subordinate legislation, all of which provided appropriate levels of scrutiny to the Assembly. Extending the Bill beyond domestic properties (Clause 1) The Committee considered the extension of the Bill to properties affected by a high hedge other than those described as 'domestic'. The Committee was advised that the primary focus of the Bill is to resolve disputes between neighbours over the height of an adjacent hedge. The Committee accepted the Department's rationale. Definition of 'reasonable enjoyment' (Clause 1) A problem high hedge is to be assessed in terms of how it affects the complainant's 'reasonable enjoyment' of their domestic property and 'reasonable enjoyment' refers to the enjoyment of a property by a person having access to light. The Department suggested that it would be legally difficult to provide an exhaustive definition that would encompass every situation and that it will be a matter of judgement for the council to strike a balance between the hedge owner, the complainant and the possible detrimental impact on the individual property. The Committee agreed that it should stress the importance of giving councils certainty with regard to interpretation of 'reasonable enjoyment' and recommends that comprehensive technical guidance is issued on commencement of the Bill. Protecting established forests and woodland and ancient trees (Clause 2) Several organisations were concerned about the impact of the Bill on long-established woodland and ancient trees. The Department advised that subsection 4 of Clause 2 exempts areas of 0.2 hectares or more that are forest or woodland which is in line with the Forestry Act (Northern Ireland). Furthermore, ancient trees tend to be single and deciduous and would therefore be excluded from the Bill. The Committee was content with the Department's response. Assessing a problem hedge (Clause 2) Some individuals were keen for the Committee to establish what factors would be taken into account when a problem high hedge was being assessed. In particular there were concerns about the distance of a problem hedge from a complainant's house, the height differences between the affected houses and the distances between trees that form a problem hedge. The Department stressed that the barrier to light will be the determining factor and the Committee was content with this explanation. Scope of the Bill (Clause 2) Several organisations were disappointed that the Bill would not be covering single trees and other problems associated with hedges and trees such as roots, overhanging branches and fallen leaves. Research and Library Service advised the Committee that even though not all councils recorded high hedge/tall tree complaints a significant proportion of complaints received by councils related to single trees rather than hedges. Having ascertained that single ancient or deciduous trees would not be affected the Committee asked the Department to reconsider the inclusion of single evergreen/semi-evergreen trees in the Bill. The Committee considered the Department's response which indicated it was not willing to extend the scope and agreed to a Committee amendment to include single evergreen and semi-evergreen trees within the scope of the Bill. The Committee also agreed that if this Committee amendment is subsequently ruled out of scope of the Bill, to recommend that the Department should recognise the need for legislation to be brought forward promptly to address the detrimental impact on reasonable enjoyment of properties cause by single evergreen or semi-evergreen trees. Fees for complaints (Clause 3) Several councils were concerned that requiring complainants to pay a fee is against local government practice and contradicts the 'polluter pays principle'. In response the Department stated that any fee levied is entirely at the discretion of the council. The response pointed out that the payment of a complaints fee means that the cost does not fall to wider ratepayers who do not derive any benefit from the council's intervention and stressed that it is not an offence to grow a hedge and there is no innocent or guilty party. Complaints fees are also intended to deter frivolous or vexatious complaints. Members remained convinced that it would be most appropriate for councils to be required to refund fees should a complaint be upheld. The Department stressed that the discretionary power contained within the Bill as drafted allows councils to recover their costs and also to have the effect of deterring frivolous or malicious complaints. The fee would be a payment for a service provided to the complainant and not a penalty imposed on any party. The council, if it wished could choose to waive or reduce the level of fee to take account of the circumstances of the complainant. The Bill also makes provision for the fee to be refunded at the discretion of the council. The Committee recognised however that by simply allowing the council to make a refund to a successful complainant without recouping it from the hedge owner would result in the rate payer bearing the burden of the refund. The Committee was not content for this to be the case and agreed to recommend that the Bill should be amended to make provision for a complaint fee to be passed to the hedge owner in the event of a complaint being upheld. Requiring Departmental regulations to set a cap on fees The Bill includes a power for the Department to limit the level of fees but it indicated to the Committee that it was unlikely to do this unless there was a clear need to do so after the legislation had been operational for some time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Herefordshire News Sheet
    CONTENTS ARS OFFICERS AND COMMITTEE FOR 1991 .................................................................... 2 PROGRAMME SEPTEMBER 1991 TO FEBRUARY 1992 ................................................... 3 EDITORIAL ........................................................................................................................... 3 MISCELLANY ....................................................................................................................... 4 BOOK REVIEW .................................................................................................................... 5 WORKERS EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION AND THE LOCAL HISTORY SOCIETIES OF HEREFORDSHIRE ............................................................................................................... 6 ANNUAL GARDEN PARTY .................................................................................................. 6 INDUSTRIAL ARCHAEOLOGY MEETING, 15TH MAY, 1991 ................................................ 7 A FIELD SURVEY IN KIMBOLTON ...................................................................................... 7 FIND OF A QUERNSTONE AT CRASWALL ...................................................................... 10 BOLSTONE PARISH CHURCH .......................................................................................... 11 REDUNDANT CHURCHES IN THE DIOCESE OF HEREFORD ........................................ 13 THE MILLS OF LEDBURY .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RAOB Directory June 2017.Xlsx
    No. 47 NEW SERIES Issued May 2014 3 R.A.O.B. G.L.E. PHILANTHROPY CONVIVIALITY THE ROYAL ANTEDILUVIAN ORDER OF BUFFALOES DIRECTORY And Official List of Lodges under the Grand Lodge of England Circulated throughout the World Compiled and Published by authority of the Grand Lodge of England By Christopher McMahon Grand Secretary R.A.O.B. G.L.E. Grove House Harrogate HG1 4LA Copyright R.A.O.B. G.L.E. CONTENTS Page No. HOME PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGES ………………………………… 3 - 92 OVERSEAS PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGES …………………………. 93 - 94 LODGES DIRECT UNDER THE GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND ………………………………. 95 - 96 RAOB CLUBS Controlled by PGL's or Minor Lodges …………………………… 97 - 98 Controlled by Independent Committees ………………………… 99 - 100 OTHER GRAND LODGES …………………………………………….. 101 - 127 INDEX OF PLACE NAMES 128 - 136 * Indicates Disabled Access Page 1 The Grand Primo 2014 BRO. BRIAN JOHN FOOT Page 2 PROVINCIAL GRAND LODGES ABERDEEN PROV. GRAND LODGE Sec: G.S. Munro, 87 Gairn Terrace, Aberdeen, AB10 6AY Tel: 07979 697324. Email: [email protected] NO NAME AND ADDRESS MEETING P.G.L. RUA Social Club, 5-7 West Craibstone Street, Aberdeen, 2nd. Wed 8.00 p.m. AB11 6DL (except July) ROH. ASS, RUA Social Club, 5-7 West Craibstone Street, Tues after PGL 7.30 p.m. Aberdeen, AB11 6DL KTS CHAP, RUA Social Club, 5-7 West Craibstone Street 2nd Tues after PGL 7.30 p.m. Aberdeen, AB11 6DL 6952 BON ACCORD, RUA Social Club, 5-7 West Craibstone Street Tues. 8.30 p.m. Aberdeen, AB11 6DL 7174 FAITHLIE, British Legion Club, School Street, Fraserburgh, Mon 7.30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Account of the Antiquities, Family Pictures and Other Notable Articles
    A B RI EF ACCOUNT OF THE A N TI U ITI E S ’ FAM I LY PICT U RES Q , AND OTH ER NOTAB LE A RTICL ES % BBEY E T FLA LEY A , C0 . G LO U C S E R . R F AM ILY U SE A ND P VAT I NF AT COM PI LED FO R I E OR M I ON ONLY . W . 1 1 2 . A . C B . , 9 BRISTOL E . H MMON S . W C , 2, ST STEPHEN STREET . t h se w In the preparation of e notes , the riter is much indebted to his nephew, B . Es . and . M . now Sir Francis H C , John D Pode , q , H artin Gibbs , Esq The death of the late Lord Aldenharn has deprived the family of his unrivalled know- ledge o i all the subjects discussed in this paper . These Notes must be read in Flaxle Cartular 1 88 M emoirs o the connection with the y y, published in 7 , and the f B ve F amil Lon m ans . oe y y ( g , both by the present writer jf lagleg Elbbeg pictures. HE E o f fo r T S pictures consist two distinct groups, which may the present purpose be roughly classified as follows L P s ( ) ortraits and mi cellaneous pictures painted for, or acquired by, the o f Bo ev e erlo d e owners Flaxley Abbey, during the y p , b fore or soon , . 1 6 . after the purchase of the Abbey property, circ 54 I L P fo r ( ) ortraits and other pictures painted , or acquired by, the owners o f 1 the Abbey during the Crawley period, subsequent to 7 26 .
    [Show full text]
  • Medieval Lives in Castleton and Hope
    Medieval Lives in Castleton and Hope Report on the historical research for the Medieval common people in Castleton and Hope villages. Produced as part of the Lives of the Common People project, January 2012 - July 2013. By Di Curtis, Angela Darlington, Kay Harrison, Jeanette Holmes, Patricia Miles, Ann Price, John Talbot and Bill Bevan. Castleton and Hope Historical Societies July 2013 Castleton Historical Society and Hope Historical Society Abstract Angela Darlington The period covered by this document extends over nearly 600 years from the Norman Conquest to the English Civil War. In focusing on the lot of the common people of Castleton and Hope, it provides a backcloth in terms of the land that they occupied, and some of the most important influences in their day-to-day lives. They raised their families in unpredictable circumstances affected by the vagaries of climate and disease. In what was already a difficult existence, they also had to contend with the constraints of forest rule and the onerous burden of taxation. The church and the lead-mining industry both played a central part in these two North Derbyshire communities. The scene is set with William the Conqueror’s great Domesday survey and a discussion of the differences between the two villages in terms of land areas, taxable value and administration as described for 1066 and 1086. At the time of the Norman Conquest Hope was a larger and much more important settlement than Castleton, but within 20 years of the Conquest was apparently declining in economic status whilst Castleton was growing. Hopedale within the Royal Forest of Peak was the home of Hope and Castleton villages and so Forest Law was central to the people that lived and worked there.
    [Show full text]
  • The Visitation of Cheshire in the Year 1580
    329. / H22 Columbia tHniumitp '& intljcCifpofltrtn^ork THE LIBRARIES THE $) tt b 1 1 c a 1 1 o n £ OF %\)t Jlarletan ^octetp. ESTABLISHED A.D. MDCCCLXIX. Volume xmm. culicdngijtfiarcuts af the Smutty ftofottmcot* Clic^tiT //;/•" ;>./•(. 1„j,// /law ' ', i /<•//. Of' J/mrintlin ofJ^ad'fH, I'm.,/.-,//: Stiltsan ck / ,;i id I •i.rn cf/Hn/jiriJ t'l,l :h. I': St I'll '! a/ /.' if// r/ y/'i/i//v"'^t /drill* H /•/ Dunhtun n 7i 7io/>i"it S/ih'ii/u't/ tUi.Ui.am t tiui/>/i'S /}<ivu !•/ i^/viiftiu/ 1,'iVlrll (')' /in 1A1I fill Wsttatton of Cbesfttre IN THE YEAR 1580, MADE BY ROBERT GLOVER, SOMERSET HERALD, foe WILLIAM ELOWER, NORROY KING OE ARMS, WITH NUMEROUS ADDITIONS AND CONTINUATIONS, TNCLUDING THOSE FROM Cijf agitation of CfjcSfjirr MADE IN THE YEAR 1566, BY THE SAME HERALD. WITH AN APPENDIX, CONTAINING CJje Visitation of a part of CJjcsJjtve IN THE YEAR 1533, MADE BY WILLIAM FELLOWS, LANCASTER HERALD, FOE THOMAS BENOLTE, CLARENCEUX KING OF ARMS. AND A FRAGMENT OF Clje Visitation of tjjc City of Chester IN THE YEAR 1591, MADE BT THOMAS CHALONER, DEPUTY TO THE OFFICE OF ARMS. EDITED BY JOHN PAUL RYLANDS, E.S.A. LONDON: 1882. — ; preface- The principal part of the present volume consists of a transcript of two almost identical manuscripts in the British Museum numbered 1424 and 1505 in the Harleian Collection. In the Official Catalogue of the Harleian Manuscripts, printed, in folio, in the year 1808, they are thus described : "1424. r " An Heraldical Book in fol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Composition of the Territorial Air Force 1930
    The Territorial Air Force 1925-1957 – Officer Recruitment and Class Appendix 2 FRANCES LOUISE WILKINSON A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Wolverhampton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2017 This work or any part thereof has not previously been presented in any form to the University or to any other body whether for the purposes of assessment, publication or for any other purpose (unless otherwise indicated). Save for any express acknowledgments, references and/or bibliographies cited in the work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and of no other person. The right of Frances Louise Wilkinson to be identified as author of this work is asserted in accordance with ss.77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. Signature……………………………………….. Date…………………………………………….. Appendix Contents Pages Appendix 1 Officers of the reformed RAuxAF 4-54 Appendix 2 Officers commissioned into the RAuxAF With no squadron number given 55-61 Appendix 3 United Kingdom Officers of the Royal Air Force Volunteer Reserve 62-179 3 Officers of the Re-formed Royal Auxiliary Air Force 1946-1957 The following appendix lists the officers of the Royal Auxiliary Air Force by squadron. The date of commission has been obtained by using www.gazette-online.co.uk and searching the archive for each squadron. Date of commission data is found in the Supplements to the London Gazette for the date given. Where material has been found from other press records, interviews, books or the internet, this has been indicated in entries with a larger typeface.
    [Show full text]
  • Open a PDF List of This Collection
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 MISCELLANEOUS DEEDS CLC/522 Reference Description Dates CLC/522/001 Deeds relating to property on Monkwell 1642 - 1748 [Mugwell] Street The earlier documents refer to Windsor House. Later documents refer to Windsor Court. Included in the bundle are a copy of Fire Court decisions regarding the property, dated 1668, which lists the pre-Fire tenants and their rents. The 1717, 1719, 1739 deeds mention the rebuilding of the site after the Great Fire. The 1717 deed mentions a "Meeting House" being part of the property and in 1748 Windsor Court included "A Publick Place of Worship for Protestant Dissentors" . 1 bundle of 15 items CLC/522/002 Deed of gift of messuages in St Leonards, 1468 Nov 20 Shoreditch and relating to lands and tenements in St Botolph outside Bishopsgate, City of London Described as lying between the land of William Heryot to the north and east, land recently of William Heryot to the south, and the King's highway to the west. Conveyed by John Marny, John Say, William Tyrell de Beches, Robert Darcy, Thomas Cook, knight, John Clopton esq, John Grene, John Poynes esq, Henry Skeet, chaplain, Robert Hotoft, and Richard Chercheman, to John Gadde, sherman, John Marchall, mercer, William Heryot, sherman, and John Weldon, grocer, all of London 1 document CLC/522/003 Abstract of title to leasehold premises situtate in 1804 Liquorpond Street and Leicester Street in the Parish of Saint Andrew Holborn in the County of Middlesex Provides a summary of ownership between 1694 and 1804. In 1694 William Ward bequeathed 5 houses and various leases to his son Alexander Ward, his daughter Elizabeth Cock and her son William Cock.
    [Show full text]
  • Gatcombe, Purton, and Blakeney Walk 4 6 Miles
    Walk Four Walk 4 6 miles (9½ km) Gatcombe, Purton, and Blakeney THE HAMLET OF GATCOMBE (1) has Where the fence ends, bear slightly left long been associated with the traditional across the field to go through a kissing gate fisheries of the River Severn. Start the walk in the far left-hand corner, turning right to Good river views, historic riverside hamlets, and some interesting railway by taking the footpath downstream between follow the fence to another kissing gate. remains. A fairly hilly walk, mostly across fields (may be muddy in parts) and the railway line (2) on your left and a wooded This leads to a dirt track, which you follow along lanes; 19 stiles. slope on your right. Note the old wharf straight ahead. The spire of Lydney Church and the fast-decaying stop boats (3). After can be seen to the left, with the imposing START at the end of the minor road in Gatcombe, reached from the A48 crossing two stiles and a small stream the path house of Lydney Park on the hillside beyond Gloucester to Chepstow road in Blakeney. Please park carefully, leaving space goes up steps to another stile and then into a (10). The track bends left through a gap in for other cars to turn. GR SO 679054. Refreshments: Cock Inn, Nibley; other field. Turn left to follow the field boundary the hedge (with views of the Severn Bridge – facilities (pub, shop) in Blakeney. Bus: 73 (Gloucester–Chepstow) to Nibley. to a stile on the left, which leads to a path see Walk 2) and follows the right-hand field between wire fences.
    [Show full text]
  • Bailey-Britton History and Genealogy
    A WAAGAU.EY BAI LEY-BRITTON HISTORY AND GENEALOGY 0 By T. H. BAILEY Kingsport, T cnncszee 1962 "But strew his ashes to the wind, Whose sword or voice has served mankind, And is he dead, whose glorious mind Lifts him on high? To live in hearts we leave behind, Is not to die." SERVICE, a balm for sorrow. INTRODUCTION Abom 45 years ago some friends and I were talking about things in general, when my friends began to talk about their Ancestry - their grandfathers and great grandfathers. I lis­ tened for a while and finally said, "well, I couldn't tell you my grandfather's name on either side if I had to be shot." One of my friends in surprise. exclaimed, ''What! Did a buzzard lay you on a stump?" I did not take offense, knowing that he was joking, but r hung my head for a moment and said, 'Well, I don't know, but I am going to find out, beginning right now." I began thinking, iust how did r come to be here? Who, where and how did I get here and know so little about it? At that time, my father and mother were dead. I found with some difficulty, that my grandfather died in the Mexican .War in 1848, not long after the surrender of the City of Mexico, when my father was only two years old. ft seems that in those days but few people kept any records of their ancestry, and did not even talk very much about them. Consequently my father knew very little about his people, to pass on to his posterity.
    [Show full text]