DOCSLIB.ORG

Management of Cabbage Aphid, Brevicoryne Brassicae L. on Canola Crop Using Neonicotinoids Seed Treatment and Salicylic Acid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management of Cabbage Aphid, Brevicoryne Brassicae L. on Canola Crop Using Neonicotinoids Seed Treatment and Salicylic Acid View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Journal of Phytopathology and Pest Management (Al-Azhar University) Journal of Phytopathology and Pest Management 2(3): 9-17, 2015 pISSN:2356-8577 eISSN: 2356-6507 Journal homepage: http://ppmj.net/ Management of Cabbage Aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae L. on Canola Crop Using Neonicotinoids Seed Treatment and Salicylic Acid M. F. Mahmoud, M. A. M. Osman* Plant protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt Abstract Cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae L. is one of the most important pests on canola worldwide and in Egypt. Field experiments were conducted in the Faculty of Agriculture Farm, Suez Canal University, Ismailia Governorate during 2012/13 and 2013/14 seasons. The efficacy of neonicotinoids seed treatment and spraying salicylic acid (SA) alone or in combination against B. brassicae and their impact on canola yield were investigated. Results showed that canola seeds treated with Gaucho 70% WS, Cruiser70% WS and Actara 25% th WG were not effective for managing of B. brassicae in the late of growing season from 15 st week to 21 week. However, SA application showed significant difference in reduction of infestation compared to control. Data revealed that seed treatment with neonicotinoid insecticides followed by foliar application with SA was associated with enhanced resistance against B. brassicae. Moreover, results showed relatively increase in seed yield/plant (g) and yield/fed. (kg) in this treatment than neonicotinoid insecticides seed treatment alone, or SA alone and control. Key words: Canola crop, cabbage aphid, neonicotinoids seed treatment, salicylic acid. Copyright © 2015 ∗ Corresponding author: M. A. M. Osman, E-mail: [email protected] 9 Mahmoud &Osman, 2015 Introduction option for reducing aphid damage and preventing outbreaks. Neonicotinoids are predominantly used as seed dressings for Canola, Brassica napus L. is one of the a broad variety of crops such as oilseed most important oil crops (Miri, 2007) and rape, sunflower, cereals, cotton, at present, is the third largest source of sorghum, corn and potatoes. vegetable oil all over the world (Kandil Imidacloprid was the first neonicotinoid & Gad, 2012). In Egypt, canola has a seed treatment insecticide used bright future to contribute in reducing oil commercially to protect seeds and deficiency gap between production and seedlings against injury by early season consumption of edible oil; particularly it insects (El-Naggar & Zidan, 2013; Wilde could be successfully grown during et al., 2000). It is effective for controlling winter season in newly reclaimed land many insect pests such as, aphids, thrips, outside the old one of Nile valley to get jassids, mites, wireworms, and true bug around the competition with other crops when used as a seed treatment, as soil occupied the old cultivated area (Sharaan and foliar applications (El-Naggar & et al., 2002). Canola crops are most Zidan, 2013; Marghub et al, 2010; susceptible to damage by a wide range of Naveed et al., 2010; Prasana et al., insect pests from seedling establishment 2004). Thiamethoxam is a second- through to seed development. There are generation neonicotinoid. It provides several insect pests, which attack canola excellent control of a wide variety of crop in Egypt, but aphids are the most commercially important insect pests on a serious of all the insect pests attack variety of crops. After seed treatment, canola (Mahmoud & Shebl, 2014). imidacloprid and thiamethoxam show Cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae is systemic and residual toxicity and known to be the most abundant and interfere with the transmission of stimuli destructive species of aphididae on or impulses in the nervous system of canola crop during the flowering and insect herbivores, and give excellent podding stage (Mahmoud & Shebl, 2014; control against a broad range of Sayed & Teilep, 2013; Aslam et al., commercially important sucking insect 2007). Current management strategies for pests (Zhang et al., 2011). Plants can insects depend largely on chemical suffer from a wide range of abiotic control. Seed treatment with systemic stresses, including drought, flooding, insecticide is an integral part of pest heat, cold, salinity, extreme light management tactics, which is intensity and mechanical damage, as well comparatively less pollutant to the as biotic stresses such as attacks by a environment, cost effective, selective and wide array of pathogens and insects reported to maintain natural equilibrium (Buchanan et al., 2000). Plants possess (Nault et al., 2004). Fast reproduction of an innate cell immunity and systemic B. brassicae represents the most serious signals emanating from infection sites threat to canola crops; effective (Chisholm et al., 2006). Host plant management requires alternative strategy resistance is one of the most promising as neonicotinoid insecticides seed methods to reduce the dependence of treatment and plant resistance as a viable pesticides. Salicylic acid (SA), a plant 10 Mahmoud &Osman, 2015 hormone plays an important role in Neonicotinoid seed treatment: Three induction of plant defense against a neonicotinoid seed treatments were variety of biotic and abiotic stresses tested: Gaucho70% WS (Imidacloprid, 5 through morphological, physiological g a.i /kg seed), Cruiser 70% WS and biochemical mechanisms. It regulates (Thiamethoxam, 3 g a.i /kg seed) and the activities of various enzymes such as, Actara 25%WG (Thiamethoxam, 3.5 g peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase a.i/kg seed). For treatment, canola seeds (PPO), superoxide dismutase (SOD), were taken in a plastic container with phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) etc., little quantity of fine sand. Then 10 ml of which are the major components of water, few drops of gum (sticker) and induced plant defense against biotic and required quantity of neonicotinoid abiotic stresses (Hayat et al., 2010; insecticides were added and stirred Rajjou et al., 2006; Peng et al., 2004). carefully. If necessary more water was The objective of the current study is to added drop by drop and stirred well to evaluate the efficacy of the get slurry. Lid of the container was neonicotinoids seed treatment, Gaucho tightened and shaken for 30 seconds to 70% WS, Cruiser70% WS and Actara get uniform coating of the slurry on the 25% WG and the elicitor Salicylic acid seeds. The seeds were then air dried in for managing Brevicoryne brassicae L. shade overnight and sown next day on canola plants under field conditions, (Jagadish and Gowda, 1994). and their impact on canola yield. Treatments of Salicylic acid: Canola Materials and methods plots were sprayed with Salicylic acid (SA) at the rate of 250 mg-L. SA was Experimental design: The experiment dissolved in a few drops of ethanol and was conducted in Ismailia Governorate, then dispersed in water to give required during 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 rate. Plants were sprayed after 30 days of seasons. Canola, cv. Serw 4 (the most sowing by one week interval for three common cultivar grown in Ismailia times using hydraulic sprayer. Control region) was sown on 20 October 2012 plots applied only with distilled water, and on 21 October 2013; the most each treatment was replicated 4 times. suitable time to become naturally infested with aphids. Plants were thinned to one Cabbage aphid count: The experiment plant per hill; 20 cm between hills to was left for natural infestation; data were insure 27.000 plants/fed. Recommended recorded at weekly interval, from first cultural and agronomic practices were occurrence of pest at the fifteenth week adopted from sowing to harvest. No of plantation till crop harvest (first week insecticide was sprayed in and around the of February to third week of March). experimental fields. The experimental Aphid counts were recorded from each area was divided into eight treatment of the 10 randomly plants on 10 cm areas including the control. Each terminal shoot length from the main stem treatment included four replicates. The in every replicate. A scoring protocol replicates were distributed in a was used to measure both the incidence randomized complete block design. of cabbage aphid in the crop (percentage 11 Mahmoud &Osman, 2015 of main stems affected) and the level of Results infestation (depth of colony in centimeters). The rating system was as There was a significant difference (P≤ follows, with scores averaged as a 0.0000) in the mean number of aphids/10 measure over the whole treatments: cm terminal length stem of plants (Jenkins et al., 2011). between treatments and control throughout the seven weeks of 0 = nil present, 1 = 1.0 cm colony, 2 = investigation in 2013 and 2014 seasons. 2.5 cm colony, 3 = 5.0 cm colony, 4 = 5.0 Data showed that control plots had – 7.5 cm colony and 5 = 10 cm colony or higher numbers of aphids than treated more. Percentage of reduction (% plots. Actara + SA had lower numbers of efficacy) was estimated according to the aphid (0.8, 1.4, 2.6, 5.8, 12.0, 25.2 and equation of Henderson and Tilton (1955). 30.4) and (0.2, 0.5, 1.5, 2.9, 8.8, 13.9 and 19.9), followed by Gaucho + SA (1.0, Yield: At harvest time, ten individual 2.5, 3.4, 8.4, 15.0, 30.2 and 38.5) and plants were chosen at random from the (0.0, 1.2, 1.5, 3.4, 9.8, 16.6 and 27.2) in middle ridge of each treatment in both both seasons during the seventh weeks of seasons and the following data were investigation, respectively (Tables 1 and recorded: seed yield/plant (g) and seed 2). Moreover, results showed that the yield/fed (kg). mean number of aphids increased in control and treatments gradually with Statistical analysis: The formula of investigation time from 15th week till 21th Henderson and Tilton (1955): week in both seasons. Finally, statistical analysis at P ≤ 0.05 level showed highly % population reduction (efficacy) = [1- significant differences between SA, (Ta/Ca × Cb/Tb] × 100.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cabbage Aphid Brevicoryne Brassicae Linnaeus (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae)1 Harsimran Kaur Gill, Harsh Garg, and Jennifer L
    EENY577 Cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae Linnaeus (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae)1 Harsimran Kaur Gill, Harsh Garg, and Jennifer L. Gillett-Kaufman2 Introduction The cabbage aphid belongs to the genus Brevicoryne. The name is derived from the Latin words “brevi” and “coryne” and which loosely translates as “small pipes”. In aphids, there are two small pipes called cornicles or siphunculi (tailpipe-like appendages) at the posterior end that can be seen if you look with a hand lens. The cornicles of the cab- bage aphid are relatively shorter than those of other aphids with the exception of the turnip aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach). These short cornicles and the waxy coating found on cabbage aphids help differentiate cabbage aphids from other aphids that may attack the same host plant Figure 1. Cabbage aphids, Brevicoryne brassicae Linnaeus, on cabbage. (Carter and Sorensen 2013, Opfer and McGrath 2013). Credits: Lyle Buss, UF/IFAS Cabbage aphids cause significant yield losses to many crops of the family Brassicaceae, which includes the mustards and Identification crucifers. It is important to have a comprehensive under- The cabbage aphid is difficult to distinguish from the turnip standing of this pest and its associated control measures so aphid (Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach)). The cabbage aphid that its spread and damage can be prevented. is 2.0 to 2.5 mm long and covered with a grayish waxy covering, but the turnip aphid is 1.6 to 2.2 mm long and has Distribution no such covering (Carter and Sorensen 2013). The cabbage aphid is native to Europe, but now has a world- The cabbage aphid and green peach aphid (Myzus persicae wide distribution (Kessing and Mau 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Abundance of the Cabbage Aphid Brevicoryne Brassicae
    Egypt. J. Plant Prot. Res. Inst. (2020), 3 (4): 1121-1128 Egyptian Journal of Plant Protection Research Institute www.ejppri.eg.net Seasonal abundance of the cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae (Hemiptera : Aphididae) infesting canola plants in relation with associated natural enemies and weather factors in Sohag Governorate Waleed, A. Mahmoud Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. ARTICLE INFO Abstract: Article History Received: 19 / 10 /2020 Canola (Brassica napus L.) is grown in more than 120 Accepted: 22 / 12 /2020 countries around the world, including Egypt, hold the third position oil crop after palm and soybean oils . the cabbage aphid Keywords Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera : Aphididae) is distributed in many parts of the world and is present in Egypt, especially in Brevicoryne brassicae, Upper Egypt. Its damage occurs on the plant leaves and transmit population, canola, plant viruses. The present studies were carried at The Experimental parasitoid, predators, Farm of Shandweel Agricultural Research Station, Sohag temperature and Governorate, Egypt during the winter seasons of 2017/2018 and humidity. 2018/2019 to investigate the population density of the cabbage aphid B. brassicae infesting canola in relation to some biotic and abiotic factors in Sohag Governorate. Data revealed that aphid started to take place in canola fields during the first week of December in both seasons (36 days after planting), then increased to reach its peak in at 20th and 13th February in the two seasons (Between 106 to 113 days after planting), respectively. The parasitism rate by Diaeretiella rapae (MacIntosh) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) simultaneously increased as aphid populations increased in both seasons, also, the highest parasitism percentages were synchronization of the aphid numbers reduction in both seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of the Natural Enemies of Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Northwest Turkey
    Phytoparasitica https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-019-00781-8 Biodiversity of the natural enemies of aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in Northwest Turkey Şahin Kök & Željko Tomanović & Zorica Nedeljković & Derya Şenal & İsmail Kasap Received: 25 April 2019 /Accepted: 19 December 2019 # Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract In the present study, the natural enemies of (Hymenoptera), as well as eight other generalist natural aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and their host plants in- enemies. In these interactions, a total of 37 aphid-natural cluding herbaceous plants, shrubs and trees were enemy associations–including 19 associations of analysed to reveal their biodiversity and disclose Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) with natural enemies, 16 tritrophic associations in different habitats of the South associations of Therioaphis trifolii (Monell) with natural Marmara region of northwest Turkey. As a result of field enemies and two associations of Aphis craccivora Koch surveys, 58 natural enemy species associated with 43 with natural enemies–were detected on Medicago sativa aphids on 58 different host plants were identified in the L. during the sampling period. Similarly, 12 associations region between March of 2017 and November of 2018. of Myzus cerasi (Fabricius) with natural enemies were In 173 tritrophic natural enemy-aphid-host plant interac- revealed on Prunus avium (L.), along with five associa- tions including association records new for Europe and tions of Brevicoryne brassicae (Linnaeus) with natural Turkey, there were 21 representatives of the family enemies (including mostly parasitoid individuals) on Coccinellidae (Coleoptera), 14 of the family Syrphidae Brassica oleracea L. Also in the study, reduviids of the (Diptera) and 15 of the subfamily Aphidiinae species Zelus renardii (Kolenati) are reported for the first time as new potential aphid biocontrol agents in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Pest Control Services Across Spatial and Temporal Scales
    Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 181 (2013) 206–212 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/agee Detecting pest control services across spatial and temporal scales ∗ Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer , Perry de Valpine, Nicholas J. Mills, Claire Kremen Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management, University of California, Berkeley, 130 Mulford Hall #3114, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Natural habitat may deliver ecosystem services to agriculture through the provision of natural enemies Received 14 May 2013 of agricultural pests. Natural or non-crop habitat has strongly positive effects on natural enemies in Received in revised form 2 October 2013 cropland, but the resulting impact on pests is not as well established. This study measured weekly natural Accepted 4 October 2013 enemy (syrphid fly larvae) and pest (cabbage aphid) abundances in Central California broccoli fields for three years. Abundance of syrphid fly larvae increased strongly with the proportion of natural habitat Keywords: surrounding the farm. As the density of syrphid fly larvae increased, weekly aphid population growth Biological control rates slowed, such that aphid densities just prior to harvest were lowest in farms with natural habitat. Brevicoryne brassicae These landscape-mediated impacts of syrphids on aphids were not evident when data were aggregated Ecosystem services into annual averages, a common metric in research on pest control services. We suggest that higher Landscape complexity Syrphidae temporal resolution of data for natural enemy and pest abundance can reveal top–down control that is Trophic ecology otherwise masked by seasonal and interannual variation in environmental factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Response of Adalia Tetraspilota (Hope) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on Cabbage Aphid, Brevicoryne Brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
    J. Biol. Control, 23(3): 243–248, 2009 Functional response of Adalia tetraspilota (Hope) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) A. A. KHAN Division of Entomology, Sher–e–Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (K), Shalimar Campus, Srinagar 191121, Jammu and Kashmir, India. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: A study was conducted to assess the functional response of different life stages of the predacious coccinellid, Adalia tetraspilota (Hope) feeding on various densities of cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) under controlled conditions. It revealed that all stages of A. tetraspilota exhibit Type II functional response curve (a curvilinear rise to plateau) as B. brassicae densities increase and the curve predicted by Holling’s disk equation did not differ significantly from the observed functional response curve. The fourth instar larva consumed more aphids (28.40 aphids / day) followed by adult female (25.06 aphids / day), third instar larva (24.06 aphids / day), second instar larva (21.73 aphids / day), adult male (20.06 aphids / day) and first instar (13.06 aphids / day). The maximum search rate with shortest handling time was recorded for fourth instar larva (0.6383) followed by adult female (0.6264). The results suggest that the fourth instar larva are best suited for field releases for the management ofB. brassicae. However, further field experiments are needed for confirming its potential. KEY WORDS: Adalia tetraspilota, Aphididae, Brevicoryne brassicae, Coccinellidae, functional response, handling time, predation, search rates INTRODUCTION (Type I), decreasing (Type II), increasing (Type III). This could further be simplified in terms of density dependence The cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (L.) as constant (I), decreasing (II) and increasing (III) rates (Hemiptera: Aphididae) is an important worldwide pest of prey consumption and yield density dependent prey of cruciferous vegetables in temperate region.
    [Show full text]
  • Opposing Effects of Glucosinolates on a Specialist Herbivore and Its Predators
    Journal of Applied Ecology 2011, 48, 880–887 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01990.x Chemically mediated tritrophic interactions: opposing effects of glucosinolates on a specialist herbivore and its predators Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer1*, Daniel J. Kliebenstein2, Andrea Chiem3, Elizabeth Morrill1, Nicholas J. Mills1 and Claire Kremen1 1Department of Environmental Science Policy & Management, University of California, Berkeley, 130 Mulford Hall #3114, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; 2Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA; and 3Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Bldg #3140, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Summary 1. The occurrence of enemy-free space presents a challenge to the top-down control of agricultural pests by natural enemies, making bottom-up factors such as phytochemistry and plant distributions important considerations for successful pest management. Specialist herbivores like the cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae co-opt the defence system of plants in the family Brassicaceae by sequestering glucosinolates to utilize in their own defence. The wild mustard Brassica nigra,analter- nate host for cabbage aphids, contains more glucosinolates than cultivated Brassica oleracea,and these co-occur in agricultural landscapes. We examined trade-offs between aphid performance and predator impact on these two host plants to test for chemically mediated enemy-free space. 2. Glucosinolate content of broccoli B. oleracea and mustard B. nigra was measured in plant mat- ter and in cabbage aphids feeding on each food source. Aphid development, aphid fecundity, preda- tion and predator mortality, and field densities of aphids and their natural enemies were also tested for each food source.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatio-Temporal Variation of Predatory Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) and Their Relationship with Aphids in Organic Horticultural Crops in La Plata, Buenos Aires
    Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina ISSN: 0373-5680 ISSN: 1851-7471 [email protected] Sociedad Entomológica Argentina Argentina Spatio-temporal variation of predatory hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) and their relationship with aphids in organic horticultural crops in La Plata, Buenos Aires DIAZ LUCAS, María F.; PASSARELI, Lilián M.; AQUINO, Daniel A.; MAZA, Noelia; GRECO, Nancy M.; ROCCA, Margarita Spatio-temporal variation of predatory hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) and their relationship with aphids in organic horticultural crops in La Plata, Buenos Aires Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, vol. 79, no. 4, 2020 Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, Argentina Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=322064864009 PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Artículos Spatio-temporal variation of predatory hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) and their relationship with aphids in organic horticultural crops in La Plata, Buenos Aires Variación espacio-temporal de sírfidos depredadores (Diptera: Syrphidae) y su asociación con áfidos en cultivos hortícolas orgánicos de La Plata, Buenos Aires María F. DIAZ LUCAS CEPAVE (CONICET – UNLP), Argentina Lilián M. PASSARELI Laboratorio de Estudios de Anatomía Vegetal Evolutiva y Sistemática (LEAVES), Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo de La Plata, Argentina Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, vol. 79, no. 4, 2020 Daniel A. AQUINO Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, CEPAVE (CONICET – UNLP)., Argentina Argentina Noelia MAZA Received: 08 July 2020 Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán., Accepted: 21 November 2020 Argentina Nancy M. GRECO Redalyc: https://www.redalyc.org/ articulo.oa?id=322064864009 CEPAVE (CONICET – UNLP)., Argentina Margarita ROCCA [email protected] CEPAVE (CONICET – UNLP)., Argentina Abstract: Population variations of predatory hoverflies in agroecosystems depend mainly on the resources that crops and wild vegetation provides them as well as death caused by natural enemies.
    [Show full text]
  • Episyrphus Balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae)
    NOTE Eur. J. Entomol. 99: 561-564, 2002 ISSN 1210-5759 Influence of prey host plant on a generalist aphidophagous predator:Episyrphus balteatus (Diptera: Syrphidae) N ic o l a s VANHAELEN*, Ch a r l e s GASPAR and Fr é d é r ic FRANCIS Gembloux Agricultural University, Department ofPure and Applied Zoology, Passage des Déportés 2, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium Key words. Hoverfly, Episyrphus balteatus, Myzuspersicae, Brevicoryne brassicae, Brassicaceae, glucosinolates, tri-trophic interactions, allelochemicals Abstract. Secondary plant metabolites (allelochemicals) play a major role in plant-insect interactions. Glucosinolates (GLS) and their degradation products from Brassica species are attractants and feeding stimulants for Brassicaceae specialist insects but are generally repellent and toxic for generalist herbivores. The impact of these compounds on crucifer specialist insects are well known but their effect on generalist predators is still not well documented. The influence of the prey’s host plant on both development and reproduction of an aphidophagous beneficial, the hoverfly Episyrphus balteatus, was determined using the cabbage aphid, Brevico­ ryne brassicae (a specialist) and the peach aphid Myzus persicae (a generalist) reared on two crucifer plants, Brassica napus and Sinapis alba containing low and high GLS levels respectively. The prey and its host plant differently influenced life history parameters of E. balteatus. The predator’s rates of development and survival did not vary when it fed on the generalist aphid reared on different host plants. These rates decreased, however, when the predator fed on the specialist aphid reared on the host plant with high GLS content plant versus the host plant with lower GLS con­ tent.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphids and Their Host Affinity- Iii: Brevicoryne and Pseudobrevicoryne Spp
    International Journal of Science, Environment ISSN 2278-3687 (O) and Technology, Vol. 6, No 2, 2017, 1542 – 1547 2277-663X (P) APHIDS AND THEIR HOST AFFINITY- III: BREVICORYNE AND PSEUDOBREVICORYNE SPP. 1Y.S. Rathore and 2S.N. Tiwari 1Ex- Principle Scientist, Directorate of Pulse Research, Kanpur 208 026 (U.P.) 2 Professor, Deptt. of Entomology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Udham Singh Nagar 231 345 (Uttarakhand) E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Host plant affinity of 9 species of Brevicoryne and 3 species of Pseudobrevicoryne revealed that B. arctica, B. barbareae, B. jiayuguanensis were monophagous on Brassicaceae; B. fraterna on Salicaceae and B. lonicerina and B. shaposhnikovi on Caprifoliaceae. B. crambe, B. nigrisiphunculata and Brevicoryne sp. were oligophagous, whereas B. brassicae was categorized as polyphagous feeding on 78 plant species. All the three Pseudobrevicoryne species were Brassica feeders. Keywords: Aphids, Brevicoryne, Pseudobrevicoryne, dicotyledons, monocotyledons, lignosae, herbaceae. INTRODUCTION Aphis species which belong to genera Brevicoryne and Pseudobrevicoryne (Aphidini: Macrosiphini) are mostly of palaearctic origin except B. arctica which is found in arctic region of northern Canada. Both the genera are closely related except species of Pseudobrassicae possess short siphunculi, first tarsal segment with 3, 3, 2 hairs and secondary shinaria in apterae [1]. Genus Brevicoryne contains 9 species and Pseudobevicoryne 3 species. These aphid species suck the plant sap from phloem and devitalize the plant, secrete honeydew which adversely affects photosynthesis and some of them act as vector of several viruses. We have tried to study their host relationships based on the information published in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopaedia of Pests and Natural Enemies in Field Crops Contents Introduction
    Encyclopaedia of pests and natural enemies in field crops Contents Introduction Contents Page Integrated pest management Managing pests while encouraging and supporting beneficial insects is an Introduction 2 essential part of an integrated pest management strategy and is a key component of sustainable crop production. Index 3 The number of available insecticides is declining, so it is increasingly important to use them only when absolutely necessary to safeguard their longevity and Identification of larvae 11 minimise the risk of the development of resistance. The Sustainable Use Directive (2009/128/EC) lists a number of provisions aimed at achieving the Pest thresholds: quick reference 12 sustainable use of pesticides, including the promotion of low input regimes, such as integrated pest management. Pests: Effective pest control: Beetles 16 Minimise Maximise the Only use Assess the Bugs and aphids 42 risk by effects of pesticides if risk of cultural natural economically infestation Flies, thrips and sawflies 80 means enemies justified Moths and butterflies 126 This publication Nematodes 150 Building on the success of the Encyclopaedia of arable weeds and the Encyclopaedia of cereal diseases, the three crop divisions (Cereals & Oilseeds, Other pests 162 Potatoes and Horticulture) of the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board have worked together on this new encyclopaedia providing information Natural enemies: on the identification and management of pests and natural enemies. The latest information has been provided by experts from ADAS, Game and Wildlife Introduction 172 Conservation Trust, Warwick Crop Centre, PGRO and BBRO. Beetles 175 Bugs 181 Centipedes 184 Flies 185 Lacewings 191 Sawflies, wasps, ants and bees 192 Spiders and mites 197 1 Encyclopaedia of pests and natural enemies in field crops Encyclopaedia of pests and natural enemies in field crops 2 Index Index A Acrolepiopsis assectella (leek moth) 139 Black bean aphid (Aphis fabae) 45 Acyrthosiphon pisum (pea aphid) 61 Boettgerilla spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Suitability of an Artificial Diet for Rape Aphid, Brevicoryne Brassicae, Using Life Table Parameters
    African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 8 (18), pp. 4663-4666, 15 September, 2009 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB ISSN 1684–5315 © 2009 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Suitability of an artificial diet for rape aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae, using life table parameters A. Balvasi1*, G. R. Rassoulian1, A. R. Bandani1 and J. Khalghani2 1Plant Protection Department, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. 2 Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Iran. Accepted 14 May, 2009 Experiments based on life tables are suitable for the understanding of the population dynamics of insects. In this work, suitability of an artificial diet was studied through age-specific life tables. Development, survival, reproduction rate and population growth parameters of the rape aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (Hom: Aphididae) were evaluated on leaf discs of Brassica oleracea, and a liquid artificial diet enclosed in parafilm sachets under incubator condition. Life parameters of 2 treatments were close to each other. The artificial diet that was used in this study had no significance differences in life table parameters compared with these parameters on leaf of B. oleracea. The results obtained in this study indicated that this artificial diet can be useful for rearing and other tests based on artificial diet. Key words: Life table, artificial diet, Brevicoryne brassicae, survival, fecundity. INTRODUCTION In large measure, the success of entomology over the through a life table approach, because its parameters are past century is founded on our ability to rear insects on good index for study on insect dynamic. artificial diets (Cohen, 2004). Insects that are reared on In this experiment a completely defined synthetic diet artificial diets are used in many programs, as agents of which was suitable for rearing of some other aphids was biological control and sterile insect technologies found that with some changes can support continuous (Knipling, 1979), as feed for other animals (Versoi and culturing of rape aphid.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Trends of Certain Canola Arthropods with Notes of Its Resistance to Some Sap Feeding Insect Pests
    Available online at www.easletters.com Entomology and Applied Science ISSN No: 2349-2864 Letters, 2014, 1, 3:5-12 Population trends of certain canola arthropods with notes of its resistance to some sap feeding insect pests Sobhy A.H. Temerak 1, Tarek M. Abo-ELmaged1 and Safaa M. Amro 2 1Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt 2Plant Protection Research Institute Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt Correspondence: [email protected] (Received: 1-7-14 ) (Accepted:25-7-14) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Canola plantations are considered as an important reservoir of several arthropod pests and natural enemies. Two canola cultivars (Serw and Bactol) were cultivated during 2011/2012 growing season at Assiut Governorate. Sixteen arthropod species belonging to 12 families and 6 orders, rather than the predatory true spider were recorded. The collected species were divided into: 7 phytopahgous; 5 predators; 2 parasitoids and 2 beneficial species. The cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae L.; the peach aphid Myzus persicae (Sulz.) and their parasitoids Diaeretiella rapae (McIntoch) and Praon nicans (Mackauer) in addition to thrips, Thrips tabaci Lind. constituted the most frequent, dominant and abundant species inhabiting canola plantations. The phytophagous group constituted more than 85%, while the predatory one's constituted less than 14%. The abovementioned species were found to be active from the last week of February till harvesting after (April 9). Concerning the aphid parasitism, the first appearance of aphid parasitized mummies by D. rapae and/or P. nicans was recorded in the second half of March. The greatest parasitism percentage was recorded on April 9 with an average of 79.5% and 77.58% on Serw and Bactol cultivars, respectively.
    [Show full text]