Circulating Supar in Two Cohorts of Primary FSGS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CLINICAL RESEARCH www.jasn.org Circulating suPAR in Two Cohorts of Primary FSGS † ‡ Changli Wei,* Howard Trachtman, Jing Li,* Chuanhui Dong, Aaron L. Friedman,§ | | | Jennifer J. Gassman, June L. McMahan, Milena Radeva, Karsten M. Heil,¶ †† ‡‡ Agnes Trautmann,¶ Ali Anarat,** Sevinc Emre, Gian M. Ghiggeri, Fatih Ozaltin,§§ || ††† Dieter Haffner, Debbie S. Gipson,¶¶ Frederick Kaskel,*** Dagmar-Christiane Fischer, ‡‡‡ Franz Schaefer,¶ and Jochen Reiser, for the PodoNet and FSGS CT Study Consortia Departments of *Medicine and ‡Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; †Department of Pediatrics, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York; §Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; |Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; ¶Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; **Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Cukurova University School of Medicine, Adana, Turkey; ††Department of Pediatrics, Istanbul Medical Faculty, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey; ‡‡Division of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Laboratory on Pathophysiology of Uremia, G. Gaslini Children’s Hospital, Genoa, Italy; §§Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey; ||Department of Pediatric Kidney, Liver, and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; ¶¶Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; ***Children’s Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York; †††Department of Pediatrics, Rostock University Hospital, Rostock, Germany; and ‡‡‡Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois ABSTRACT Overexpression of soluble urokinase receptor (suPAR) causes pathology in animal models similar to pri- mary FSGS, and one recent study demonstrated elevated levels of serum suPAR in patients with the disease. Here, we analyzed circulating suPAR levels in two cohorts of children and adults with biopsy- proven primary FSGS: 70 patients from the North America–based FSGS clinical trial (CT) and 94 patients from PodoNet, the Europe-based consortium studying steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Circulating suPAR levels were elevated in 84.3% and 55.3% of patients with FSGS patients in the CT and PodoNet cohorts, respectively, compared with 6% of controls (P,0.0001); inflammation did not account for this difference. Multiple regression analysis suggested that lower suPAR levels associated with higher esti- mated GFR, male sex, and treatment with mycophenolate mofetil. In the CT cohort, there was a positive association between the relative reduction of suPAR after 26 weeks of treatment and reduction of pro- teinuria, with higher odds for complete remission (P=0.04). In the PodoNet cohort, patients with an NPHS2 mutation had higher suPAR levels than those without a mutation. In conclusion, suPAR levels are elevated in geographically and ethnically diverse patients with FSGS and do not reflect a nonspecificproinflamma- tory milieu. The associations between a change in circulating suPAR with different therapeutic regimens and with remission support the role of suPAR in the pathogenesis of FSGS. J Am Soc Nephrol 23: 2051–2059, 2012. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012030302 CLINICAL RESEARCH FSGS is an important cause of ESRD in children and – adults.1 3 It can occur as a primary disorder, conse- Received March 22, 2012. Accepted September 26, 2012. fi quent to genetic mutations in speci c podocyte pro- Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at teins, secondary to a wide range of medical problems, www.jasn.org. or as a consequence of adaptive changes to reduced Correspondence: Dr. Jochen Reiser, Department of Medicine, 4,5 . kidney mass. Intensive research for 50 years has Rush University Medical Center, 1735 W. Harrison Street, Cohn focused mainly on genetic, immunologic, and sys- Research Building, Suite 724, Chicago, IL 60612. Email: temic causes of FSGS but the cause of primary disease [email protected] remains elusive. Copyright © 2012 by the American Society of Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 23: 2051–2059, 2012 ISSN : 1046-6673/2312-2051 2051 CLINICAL RESEARCH www.jasn.org In recent years, there has been a great deal of investigation into the role of permeability factors in the pathogenesis of proteinuria and the development of primary FSGS. Proposed candidate molecules include hemopexin, vascular endothelial growth factor, and cardiotrophin-like cytokine-1.6–8 However, the detection of increased levels of most circulating perme- ability factors is generally not specific for a given glomerular disorder, and the activity or expression of these factors may be increased in patients with FSGS and minimal change ne- phrotic syndrome, two disorders with markedly disparate re- sponses to therapy and long-term prognosis.9 Soluble urokinase receptor (suPAR), the soluble form of urokinase plasminogen-type activator receptor, has been report- ed to be elevated in a number of diseases including cancer and infection in a nonspecific manner. However, its underlying mechanism of action in these conditions and its clinical value either in diagnosis or prognosis is still far from clear.10 Recently, Wei et al. reported the molecular identity of a putative perme- ability factor in FSGS.11 Approximately two-thirds of patients with primary FSGS had increased suPAR. Moreover, the circu- lating suPAR concentration was mostly normal in other forms of primary glomerular diseases including minimal change ne- phrotic syndrome, idiopathic membranous nephropathy, or preeclampsia.11 The investigators related the abnormal suPAR level to the pathogenesis of FSGS based on both in vitro and in Figure 1. Serum suPAR levels in distinct primary FSGS cohorts vivo studies, which demonstrated suPAR binding to and, more and control participants. ***P,0.001 for CT FSGS cohort versus importantly, activation of b3 integrin on podocytes. This inter- control, PodoNet FSGS cohort versus control, and CT versus action led to alterations in the morphology (foot process efface- PodoNet. Con, control. ment) and function of podocytes, which resulted in proteinuria and initiation of FSGS.11 The prevalence of elevated circulating suPAR levels in pa- was elevated in 84.3% of FSGS patients in the FSGS CT cohort tients with primary FSGS has not been systematically evalu- compared with 55.3% in the PodoNet cohort. The mean ated in any other large patient cohort. In addition, it is unclear suPAR level was higher in the FSGS CT cohort than in the if the circulating suPAR is modulated by immunosuppressive PodoNet cohort (45886203 versus 34976195 pg/ml; therapy. Therefore, in this report, we detail suPAR levels in P,0.0001). The mean serum creatinine was significantly two discrete well described cohorts of children and young adults higher in patients enrolled into the FSGS CT cohort than in with biopsy-proven primary FSGS—the North America–based PodoNet cohort, which might partially account for the differ- FSGS clinical trial (CT), and the Europe-based consortium for ence of suPAR between the two groups (see below). study of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (PodoNet). C-Reactive Protein in FSGS Patients C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute phase reactant that RESULTS increases 4–6hoursafteraninflammatory trigger, such as viral or bacterial infections. In most cases in which suPAR is pro- Elevated Circulating suPAR Levels in Distinct FSGS posed as a marker of inflammation, CRP and suPAR are pos- Cohorts itively correlated with each other.13,14 In parallel with the Circulating suPAR was measured in 150 control participants, suPAR measurements, serum CRP was determined to assess 70 patients with primary FSGS from the FSGS CT cohort, and the inflammatory status in a randomly selected subset of patients 94 patients with primary FSGS from PodoNet. Control par- from both the FSGS CT and PodoNet cohorts as well as in ticipants were age and sex matched for FSGS patients. Com- controls. The average CRP levels were generally low, indicating pared with control participants, the serum suPAR levels in minimal inflammation, and there was no difference between FSGS patients were markedly increased in both FSGS cohorts controls and FSGS patients (Figure 2A). This is consistent with (Figure 1). We set 3000 pg/ml as a cut-off value, which is based the classification of FSGS as a noninflammatory renal disease. on our own recent dataset11 as well as on a reported normal Moreover, there was no correlation between CRP and respec- mean serum suPAR level of 2710 pg/ml.12 Using 3000 pg/ml as tive suPAR levels in either controls (Figure 2B) or FSGS pa- a threshold level, the baseline circulating suPAR concentration tients (Figure 2C). In addition, serum samples from pediatric 2052 Journal of the American Society of Nephrology J Am Soc Nephrol 23: 2051–2059, 2012 www.jasn.org CLINICAL RESEARCH However, after 26 weeks of trial treatment, the mean suPAR level was significantly higher in patients assigned to CSA compared with the MMF arm (Figure 3A). When ex- amining the alteration from baseline to week 26, suPAR levels were increased in the CSA arm, but decreased in the MMF arm and the changes in suPAR levels between the two arms were significantly different (Figure 3B). These differences remained significant after controlling for age, sex, race, and the baseline levels of suPAR, eGFR, albumin, and Up/c (Table 3). With regard to the relationship