• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Early evolutionary tracks of low-mass stellar objects in modified gravity Aneta Wojnar1, ∗ 1Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Physics, University of Tartu, W. Ostwaldi 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia Using a simple model of low-mass stellar objects we have shown modified gravity impact on their early evolution, such as Hayashi tracks, radiative core development, effective temperature, masses, and luminosities. We have also suggested that the upper mass' limit of fully convective stars on the Main Sequence might be different than commonly adopted. I. INTRODUCTION is, in the so-called mass gap [38]), which merged with a black hole of 23M , provided even more questions for Working on modified gravity does not make one to for- theoretical physics of compact objects. get the elegance and success of Einstein's theory of grav- However, it turns out that there is a class of stellar ity, being already confirmed by many observations [1]; objects, with the internal structure much better under- even more, General Relativity (GR) still delights when stood than that of neutron stars, which might be used to one of its mysterious predictions, such as the existence of constrain theories of gravity. It is a family of low-mass black holes, is directly affirmed by the finding of gravi- stars (LMS) [39{41] which includes such ordinary objects tational waves as a result of black holes' binary mergers as M dwarfs (also called red dwarfs), which are cool Main [2] as well as soon after the imaging of the shadow of the Sequence stars with masses in the range [0:09 − 0:6]M , supermassive black hole of M87 [3] (see [4] for a review). brown dwarfs (stars which failed to join the Main Se- Despite the successes, there are still shortcomings quence, with masses below 0:09M ) [42, 43] or infant which, among many others, the modified gravity com- stars, that is, pre-main-sequence (PMS) stars which have munity is trying to solve by proposing extensions or/and not yet started hydrogen burning [44]. alternatives to GR. The lack of detection of dark mat- LMS are the most common stellar objects - around 70 ter and dark energy sources in order to be in agreement percent of stars in the Milky Way are red dwarfs, evolv- with the cosmological concordance model [5{10], issues ing slowly because of their small size and low masses. with unification with the high energy physics [11, 12] as Their importance becomes clear [45] when one wants to well as existence of space-time singularities [13] are just understand the properties of distant galaxies - a signif- sequent motivations for modified theories of gravity. icant part of baryonic mass is contained in LMS [46]; In order to answer the mentioned ambiguities, some globular clusters, being the oldest objects in the Universe of the extensions of GR propose to consider more gen- with reliable age determination, mainly consists of such eral than Einstein-Hilbert gravitational action (with non- objects [47]. Another, maybe the most important, argu- linear terms of curvature scalars) [18], or to include min- ment for studying LMS is our relationship with the Sun: imally or non-minimally coupled scalar fields [19, 20], the knowledge on its past and future, that is, the evo- to incorporate additional geometric ingredients [21], and lution of a star with dependent planets like the Earth, to treat the physical constants as dynamical quantities crucially determines our fate and survival possibilities. [22, 23], as a few examples. Some of those theories can be There are already many discoveries [48{55] of exoplanets already constrained by gravitational wave observations orbiting low-mass stars whose habitable properties es- [24{29]. sentially depend on star's characteristics, from which the Astrophysics also provides additional constraints (one most important one is its mass. Moreover, these objects of the most exciting is the neutron stars' merger [30]) are also studied in order to test properties of Standard arXiv:2007.13451v2 [gr-qc] 24 Nov 2020 on GR and its modifications [31{33], but also delivers Model particles as well as dark matter candidates [56{ drawbacks. The observations of neutron stars (NS) with 58].There are also works constraining the gravitational masses of two solar ones [34{36] clearly demonstrate how theories using data obtained from the Sun and white much is not understood yet when we try to construct a dwarfs observations [59, 60], such as, for instance, an- NS model with our current knowledge on gravitational alyzing the effect of an additional Yukawa component for interactions and nuclear physics at the extreme densi- gravity in the stellar equilibrium [61], the role of a non- ties. The lack of information on the conditions at the minimal coupling between matter and curvature [62] or NS center, where densities are above the nuclear satura- the effect of an ungravity component [63, 64]. 14 3 tion density ρ ≈ 2:8 × 10 gr=cm , forces to extrapolate The early evolution of low-mass stars has not been yet forms of equation of state (EoS). The recent discovery of examined in the context of modified gravity according to an object of 2:6 solar masses [37] (being above the heav- our knowledge (for a recent review on stellar structure in iest known NS and below the lightest black hole, that modified gravity see [65] while on astrophysical test see [66]. Main Sequence and red giant stars in modified grav- ity were studied in [67{69].). Due to that fact, we would ∗ [email protected] like to answer the questions if modified gravity may have 2 any significant effect on early life of such objects as well It can be shown [18] that one may rewrite the field as what kind of consequences might be carried by the equations as a dynamical equation for the conformal met- positive answer to that issue. Accordingly, we will fo- ric hµν [71, 72] and the undynamic scalar field defined as cus on the simplest example of metric-affine theories of Φ = f 0(R): gravity, that is, Palatini f(R) gravity; nevertheless, the 1 1 analogous analysis can be made for any other theory of R¯µν − hµν R¯ = κT¯µν − hµν U¯(Φ) (6a) gravity which modifies the Newtonian hydrostatic equi- 2 2 librium and related to that stellar equations. The action of Palatini f(R) gravity, which is the sim- ΦR¯ − (Φ2 U¯(Φ))0 = 0 (6b) plest generalization of GR, has the following form where we have introduced U¯(Φ) = RΦ−f(R) and appro- Z Φ2 1 p 4 ¯ −1 S = Sg + Sm = −gf(R)d x + Sm[gµν ; m]; (1) priate energy momentum tensor Tµν = Φ Tµν . It has 2κ been already shown [73{76] that this representation of µν the Palatini gravity significantly simplifies considerations where R = R gµν is the Ricci scalar constructed with the metric g and Ricci tensor built of the independent on particular physical problems. connection Γ.^ Thus the common assumption on g- metricity of the connection is abandoned. Let us notice II. PALATINI STARS that we use the (− + ++) metric signature convention 8πG while κ = − 4 [70]. The variation of 1 with respect to c The stellar structure in the metric-affine theory (for the the metric gµν gives detailed review on that topic see [65]) was studied mainly 1 in the context of spherical-symmetric solutions and mass- f 0(R)R − f(R)g = κT ; (2) µν 2 µν µν radius relation [77{86], the last one given by the modified Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations. Possible issues where Tµν is the energy momentum tensor of the matter and their solutions were discussed in [87{96]. Works on 2 δSm field, obtained in the standard way Tµν = − p . −g δgµν stability problems can be found in [76, 97{101]. Non- Later on it will be assumed to be a perfect fluid. Here, the relativistic stars which are our concern were considered primes denote derivatives with respect to the function's in [102{107]. In what follows, we will use some results 0 df(R) derived in [76, 102{104]. argument: f (R) = dR . The variation with respect to the independent connec- tion Γ^ provides A. Non-relativistic Palatini stars p 0 µν r^ β( −gf (R)g ) = 0: (3) It was demonstrated [102, 103] for the Starobinski ^ We immediately notice that rβ is the covariant deriva- model tive calculated with respect to Γ,^ that is, it is the Levi- 2 Civita connection of the conformal metric f(R) = R + βR (7) 0 that non-relativistic Palatini stars can be described by hµν = f (R)gµν : (4) the following equations A very helpful equation, called the structural equation, dp Gm(~r)ρ(~r) is obtained from the trace of 2 taken with respect to gµν = − ; (8) dr~ Φ(~r)~r2 f 0(R)R − 2f(R) = κT; (5) Z r~ m = 4πx2ρ(x)dx ; (9) where T is the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. 0 For some chosen functional f(R) it is possible to solve wherer ~2 = Φ(~r)r2 and Φ(~r) ≡ f 0(R) = 1 + 2κc2βρ(~r). the structural equation 5 in order to obtain the relation After transforming back to the Jordan frame, taking the R = R(T ). Taylor expansion around β = 0 we may write down the It is a well-known fact, derived easily from 5, that in modified hydrostatic equilibrium equation as the vacuum the Palatini gravity provides Einstein vac- uum solution with the cosmological constant indepen- p0 = −gρ(1 + κc2β[rρ0 − 3ρ]) ; (10) dently of the f(R) form. Moreover, in the case of analytic f(R) functions it was shown [14] that the center-of-mass where g = const is the surface gravity, which can be orbits are the same as in GR while the modifications of approximated on the star's surface (that is, on the pho- energy and momentum which appear in Euler equation tosphere, which is often taken as the surface of a star) are not sensitive to the experiments performed for the so- as lar system orbits so far.

Load more

  11

Copy Link