Should We Build More Prisons? 1129 Words

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Should We Build More Prisons? 1129 Words Should we build more prisons? 1129 words Pat Strickland Key Issues for the New Parliament 2010 SECURITY AND LIBERTY House of Commons Library Research Does prison work and can we afford it? The prison population has been rising, with an especially sharp increase since the mid 1990s. The Ministry of Justice attributes this to: Should we build more prisons? courts sentencing more offenders to prison each year between 1995 and 2002; Pat Strickland offenders staying in prison for longer, because of longer sentences and a decline in parole rates; and Does prison work and can we afford it? tougher enforcement following release, leading to more recalls for longer periods. Commission on English Prisons Today The prison population has been rising, with Prison population has risen KEY STATISTICS an especially sharp increase since the mid (whose president was Cherie Booth), the sharply since the mid-1990s Prison population in England and 1990s. The Ministry of Justice attributes this 100,000 Prison Reform Working Group (chaired by Wales reached a record level of almost to: Jonathan Aitken), the Conservative Party and 85,000 in April 2010, an increase of the National Audit Office. Questions raised courts sentencing more offenders to 80,000 90% since 1993 include: prison each year between 1995 and 2002; The prison estate has been Could we get better value for money by overcrowded since 1994 offenders staying in prison for longer, 60,000 “reinvesting” some of the money spent because of longer sentences and a decline In 2008/09 it cost an average of on prisons, either in other parts of the £39,600 to keep a prisoner in prison in parole rates; and 40,000 criminal justice system (such as community for a year sentences) or on activities that prevent tougher enforcement following release, The UK has the second highest crime in the first place? leading to more recalls for longer periods. 20,000 incarceration rate in Western Europe Should we have smaller local prisons, Approximately one-half of adult Some argue that increased crime levels in the which may work better by rehabilitating prisoners reoffend within one year of 1980s and high profile cases, such as James 0 offenders closer to home, or larger prisons release Bulger’s murder in 1993, fuelled political 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 providing economies of scale? competition over sentencing. In 1993 Tony Approximately three-quarters of Blair promised the Labour party conference closure of 5,500 inefficient places). Originally juvenile prisoners reoffend within one How can we make justice more responsive that he would be “tough on crime and Somethree argue “Titan that prisons” increased were tocrime provide levels those in the 1980s and high profileyear cases, of release such as James Bulger’s locally? tough on the causes of crime”, while murder7,500 places.in 1993, Following fuelled consultation,political competition five over sentencing. In 1993 Tony Blair promised the Michael Howard told the Conservative party Could restorative justice reduce the need Labourlarge prisonsparty conference each holding that 1,500 he would were be “tough on crime and toughproblem on as the over-reliance causes of crime”, on imprisonment, while for imprisonment? conference that “prison works”. Certainly, proposed, with total capital costs of around there has been a historically large amount of Michael Howard told the Conservative party conference that “prisondrawing works”. resources Certainly, away from there preventive has and £1.2 billion. A maintenance backlog for the rehabilitative work. Should more be done to rehabilitate criminal justice legislation since 1994. Some beenexisting a historically estate may large cost amount a further of £1.2 criminal billion. justice legislation since 1994. Some also suggest that the prisoners serving less than twelve months, also suggest that the criminal justice system criminal justice system – in the parole process, for example – hasSo become is prison more good risk value-averse. for money? The 60% of whom are reconvicted within a – in the parole process, for example – has All three main political parties have proposals purposes of imprisonment are often given year but who often have no access to become more risk-averse. to reduce reoffending and divert those for as incapacitation, punishment, retribution, work or courses? whom prison is inappropriate. Of these, The Labour Government aimed to achieve Key statistics deterrence and rehabilitation. The “prison only the Liberal Democrats argue that they works” argument usually cites incapacitation: So, might the fiscal crisis prompt the kind of an overall net capacity of just over 96,000 would be able to cancel the prison building reassessment which prison reform advocates by 2014, mainly through two major prison Prison population in England and Wales reached a recordprisoners level of cannot almost normally 85,000 incommit April offences programme as a consequence. whilst incarcerated. Others, citing high would welcome? Possibly. However, some building programmes. Its Core Capacity 2010, an increase of 90% since 1993 commentators fear that the need to constrain Programme was to provide 12,500 places For some, the key issue is how to keep rates of re-offending, argue that prison is The prison estate has been overcrowded since 1994 expensive and ineffective. costs will damage efforts to address the by 2012, with capital construction costs pace effectively with the rising population; causes of reoffending, thus creating further In 2008/09 it cost an average of £39,600 to keep a prisoner in prison for a year of around £2 billion and additional annual overcrowding can make rehabilitation more Several substantial reports have recently pressure on prison places. running costs of around £480 million. A difficult as prisoners have reduced access to The UK has the second highest incarceration rate in Westernexamined Europe these issues: see, for example, further 7,500 places were planned through purposeful activity and are moved around Approximately one-half of adult prisoners reoffend withinwork one by year the Justiceof release Committee, the the New Prisons Programme (alongside the more frequently. Others see the fundamental Approximately three-quarters of juvenile prisoners reoffend within one year of release 96 97 .
Recommended publications
  • 'Genocide' in Biafra
    Karen E. Smith The UK and ‘genocide’ in Biafra Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Smith, Karen E. (2014) The UK and ‘genocide’ in Biafra. Journal of Genocide Research, 16 (2- 3). pp. 247-262. ISSN 1462-3528 DOI: 10.1080/14623528.2014.936703 © 2014 Routledge This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/59261/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2014 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. The UK and ‘genocide’ in Biafra By Karen E. Smith Abstract In late August 1968, following a British proposal, Nigeria announced it would allow an International Observer Team into the country to show that it was not pursuing a campaign of genocide in Biafra. This article analyses why the United Kingdom pushed for the creation of the observer team, and shows how the team’s work was incorporated into the government’s justifications for its support of the Nigerian government.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Understandings of Politics in Britain, 1937-2014
    Popular Understandings of Politics in Britain, 1937-2014 Will Jennings Nick Clarke Gerry Stoker Jonathan Moss University of Southampton Paper for the U.K. Political Studies Association annual conference, Sheffield, 2015 . Abstract In a context of apparently recent disenchantment and disengagement from politicians, parties, and elections in Britain and certain other countries, this paper seeks to understand better what and how British citizens have thought about formal politics since the late 1930s. There is widespread alienation and withdrawal from formal politics in many countries at the present time (Hay 2007; Norris 2011; Stoker 2006). However projects to renew democracy have struggled because the causes for political disenchantment and disengagement are not clear. In this paper we use quantitative data (from historical survey data such as Gallup polls and the British Election Study) and qualitative data from the Mass Observation Archive directives on politics, combined in a mixed method approach, to start to develop answers to the following questions: What is the range of popular understandings of politics among British citizens? How have these changed over time? We first summarise longitudinal survey evidence of trends, fluctuations and cycles of public opinion regarding different aspects of formal politics. Secondly, we undertake qualitative analysis of responses to the Mass Observation Archive directives on politics (from 1945, 1950, 1996/7, 2010 and 2014). The findings are then reflected on in light of contemporary research on political disengagement. The current conventional wisdom suggests that citizens are more disaffected with politics, and the practice of politics, than at any point in the post-war era. Some have argued that a ‘perfect storm’ has engulfed Britain’s governing institutions (Richards et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997
    Holders of Ministerial Office in the Conservative Governments 1979-1997 Parliamentary Information List Standard Note: SN/PC/04657 Last updated: 11 March 2008 Author: Department of Information Services All efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this data. Nevertheless the complexity of Ministerial appointments, changes in the machinery of government and the very large number of Ministerial changes between 1979 and 1997 mean that there may be some omissions from this list. Where an individual was a Minister at the time of the May 1997 general election the end of his/her term of office has been given as 2 May. Finally, where possible the exact dates of service have been given although when this information was unavailable only the month is given. The Parliamentary Information List series covers various topics relating to Parliament; they include Bills, Committees, Constitution, Debates, Divisions, The House of Commons, Parliament and procedure. Also available: Research papers – impartial briefings on major bills and other topics of public and parliamentary concern, available as printed documents and on the Intranet and Internet. Standard notes – a selection of less formal briefings, often produced in response to frequently asked questions, are accessible via the Internet. Guides to Parliament – The House of Commons Information Office answers enquiries on the work, history and membership of the House of Commons. It also produces a range of publications about the House which are available for free in hard copy on request Education web site – a web site for children and schools with information and activities about Parliament. Any comments or corrections to the lists would be gratefully received and should be sent to: Parliamentary Information Lists Editor, Parliament & Constitution Centre, House of Commons, London SW1A OAA.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY A. INTERVIEWS Jacob Rees-Mogg MP (London), 9th February 2016. Jesse Norman MP (London), 12th September 2016. Nicholas Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Ann Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Peter Hitchens (London), 11th October 2016. Anne Widdecombe (London), 11th October 2016. Lord Salisbury (London), 12th October 2016. Sir William Cash MP (London), 13th October 2016. Sir Edward Leigh MP (London), 17th January 2017. David Burrowes MP (London), 17th January 2017. Charles Moore (London), 17th January 2017. Philip Davies MP (London), 19th January 2017. Sir Gerald Howarth MP (London), 19th January 2017. Dr. Myles Harris (London), 27th January 2017. Lord Sudeley (London), 6th February 2017. Jonathan Aitken (London), 6th February 2017. David Nicholson (London), 13th February 2017. Gregory Lauder-Frost (telephone), 23rd February 2017. Richard Ritchie (London), 8th March 2017. Tim Janman (London), 27th March 2017. Lord Deben (London), 4th April 2017. Lord Griffths of Fforestfach (London), 6th April 2017. Lord Tebbit (London), 6th April 2017. Sir Adrian Fitzgerald (London), 10th April 2017. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 191 K. Hickson, Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27697-3 192 BIBLIOGRAPHY Edward Norman (telephone), 28th April 2017. Cedric Gunnery (London), 2nd May 2017. Paul Bristol (London), 3rd May 2017. Harvey Thomas (London), 3rd May 2017. Ian Crowther (telephone), 12th May 2017. Iain Duncan Smith MP (London), 4th July 2017. Angela Ellis-Jones (London), 4th July 2017. John Hayes MP (London), 4th July 2017. Dennis Walker (London), 24th July 2017. Lord Howard of Lympne (London), 12th September 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Meaningful Mentoringmeaningful Jonathan Aitken
    B reakthrough Britain Meaningful Mentoring Meaningful Mentoring Jonathan Aitken A policy paper for the Centre for Social Justice April 2014 The Centre for Social Justice 4th Floor, Victoria Charity Centre, 11 Belgrave Road The Centre for Social Justice London SW1V 1RB ISBN: 978 0 9927085 3 5 www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk @CSJthinktank contents Contents About the Centre for Social Justice 2 About the author 3 Acknowledgements 4 Foreword 5 Overview 7 Executive summary 11 1 The reasons and evidence for the principal recommendations 19 2 Unusual examples for mentoring 37 Conclusion 47 Appendix 49 Meaningful Mentoring | Contents 1 About the Centre for Social Justice The Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) is an independent think-tank, established to put social justice at the heart of British politics. Moved by shocking levels of disadvantage across the nation, it studies the root causes of Britain’s acute social problems in partnership with its Alliance of over 350 grassroots charities and people affected by poverty. This enables the CSJ to find and promote evidence-based, experience-led solutions to change lives and transform communities. The CSJ believes that the surest way to reverse social breakdown – and the poverty it creates – is to build resilience within individuals, families and the innovative organisations able to help them. The CSJ’s Fellows Programme Over its ten-year history many exceptional people have contributed their expertise, experience and time to the CSJ. In March 2014, the CSJ set up its Fellows Programme to recognise their contribution and to provide a platform for them and other friends of the organisation to discuss fresh ways of tackling the root causes of poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federalist Society and Movement Conservatism: How a Fractious Coalition on the Right Is Changing Constitutional Law and the Way We Talk and Think About It
    THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY AND MOVEMENT CONSERVATISM: HOW A FRACTIOUS COALITION ON THE RIGHT IS CHANGING CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND THE WAY WE TALK AND THINK ABOUT IT Jonathan Riehl A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the department of Communication Studies. Chapel Hill 2007 Approved by: Advisor: J. Robert Cox Reader: V. William Balthrop Reader: Carole Blair Reader: Sally Greene Reader: Lawrence Grossberg Reader: John Harrison ABSTRACT JONATHAN RIEHL: The Federalist Society and Movement Conservatism: How a Fractious Coalition on the Right Is Changing Constitutional Law And the Way We Talk and Think About It (Under the direction of J. Robert Cox) This study is the first in-depth examination of the Federalist Society, the nation’s preeminent organization of conservative and libertarian lawyers. Founded by a few enterprising young college friends in the early days of the Reagan administration, its participants now number 40,000 lawyers, policymakers, judges, and law students. The Society functions as a forum for debate, intellectual exchange, and engagement between the factions on the right as well as their liberal opponents—hence my use of rhetorical theory. I explore how Federalists have promoted conservative legal theories of interpretation, such as originalism and textualism, and also how have also fueled the broader project of the American right to unmake the liberal consensus on a wide range of legal and social issues from Affirmative Action and race to foreign policy. By serving as a forum for the generation and incubation of conservative legal thought, the Federalist Society has provided an invaluable intellectual proving ground; and with chapters now active at all accredited law schools in the country, the Society is widening its reach and providing a home for aspiring conservative lawyers, whether they seek to go into private practice, public service, or the judiciary.
    [Show full text]
  • R V Charles Elphicke Character References
    5 6 7 05/08/2020 Ref: Mr Charles Elphicke To whom it may concern: My name is Neil Wiggins. I am a 53-year-old company director born in Dover 28/01/1967. I first met Mr Elphicke, who I shall hereafter refer to as Charlie, in 2010 on the day when he took up the seat in Parliament for Dover and Deal, to which he had just been elected for the first time. I had written to him during the election campaign of 2010 with some ideas as to how the then proposed privatisation of the Port of Dover could be successfully countered in such a way as to ensure that the port would either remain as a Trust Port or be transferred into the ownership of its local community in perpetuity. Charlie’s response was to invite my family and I to the Houses of Parliament once he had taken up his position so that I could give him a complete briefing whilst my family were given a tour of The House. On this occasion we spoke for a couple of hours and it was during this meeting that the foundations of what became a successful campaign to prevent the private equity sale of the Port of Dover were laid. Charlie and I worked closely together on this project over the succeeding 2 years and became friends during this time. We met quite often as families with Charlie, Natalie, myself, my wife, and our children ). As with pretty much any type of significant campaign to alter the course of action chosen by a government, our wives and children joined us on Saturday mornings distributing information, meeting with people and talking to them, helping us to deliver leaflets, attending Town Hall and Village Hall meetings and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • 19. the Impact of Arab Culture in the Consolidation-Othman Abdel Rahman
    IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature (IMPACT: IJRHAL) ISSN(E): 2321-8878; ISSN(P): 2347-4564 Special Edition, Mar 2014, 139-148 © Impact Journals THE IMPACT OF ARAB CULTURE IN THE CONSOLIDATION OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS (CASE STUDY: THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN) OTHMAN ABDEL RAHMAN ABDEL LATIF MOHAMED Professor of Islamic Studies and International, Egyptian Kazakh University of Islamic Culture (Noor), Almaty, Kazakhstan ABSTRACT The mission of the research is to put these challenges in front of scientists, researchers and specialists of different their level of social and location and position job or Cultural perhaps contributes to the extent that can keep what's left of our cultural heritage of the great and contributes to the consolidation of international relations between the Arab countries and other highlight of the Republic of Kazakhstan. KEYWORDS: Arab Culture, International Political, Economic, Globalization INTRODUCTION General Introduction, Background, and the Research Problem International relations are relations of looking interaction between peoples and nations in terms of each other, It is also looking at the international interaction at all levels, whether individual or international political or economic, cultural or social or military. There is no doubt that the changes that have lived and experienced human and especially since the beginning of the twentieth century to today, Especially the massive developments that have occurred in the last decade of the last century, which produced a new world and a new humanity, a stage so-called globalization, And which have had the greatest impact on the formation of the challenges of a new kind of impose itself on the reality of Arab life and it was the most useful is the culture because it is the spirit of the nation and its identity (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Living Former Members of the House of Commons
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 05324, 7 January 2019 Living former Members Compiled by of the House of Sarah Priddy Commons Living former Members MPs are listed with any titles at the time they ceased to be an MP and the party they belonged to at the time. The list does not include MPs who now sit in the House of Lords. A list of members of the House of Lords who were Members of the House of Commons can be found on the Parliament website under House of Lords FAQs. Further information More detailed information on MPs who served between 1979 and 2010, including ministerial posts and party allegiance, covering their time in the UK Parliament and other legislatures, can be found in the Commons Library Briefing on Members 1979-2010. Association of Former Members of Parliament The PoliticsHome website has contact details for the Association of Former Members of Parliament. Parliament: facts and figures • Browse all briefings in the series This series of publications contains data on various subjects relating to Parliament and Government. Topics include legislation, MPs, select committees, debates, divisions and Parliamentary procedure. Feedback Any comments, corrections or suggestions for new lists should be sent to the Parliament and Constitution Centre. Suggestions for new lists welcomed. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Living former Members of the House of Commons Note: Does not include MPs who are now sit in the House of Lords Name Full Title Party* List Name Mr
    [Show full text]
  • Jacob C. Lefkowitz When Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser
    BETWEEN A CANAL AND A HARD ALLIANCE Jacob C. Lefkowitz The most critical period of Dwight D. Eisenhower’s tenure as President came in October, 1956 during the Suez Crisis. Less than two weeks before a presidential election, Eisen- hower was faced with an invasion of Egypt by Israel, which was working with France and Great Britain to free the Suez Canal after it had been nationalized by Egyptian President Gamal Nasser. Conventional wisdom holds that Eisenhower’s deft handling of the crisis at the height of the Cold War avoided a third World War in which the United States and the Soviet Union would have supported their respective proxies in the Middle East. This article argues that Eisenhower’s decision-making was short-sighted and ultimately counterproductive to the long-term interests of the United States. Specifically, the au- thor argues that Eisenhower’s decision to act as an “honest broker” between Egypt and the United States’ traditional western allies had lasting negative effects on U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. The article examines the flawed assumptions that underpinned Eisenhower’s approach, including his misapprehension of Soviet aims and intentions, as well as his conviction that the U.S. would gain goodwill in the Arab nationalist world by distancing the U.S. from the “taint” of Western colonialism. In actuality, Eisenhower’s conduct during the crisis had significant repercussions that harmed U.S. interests in the Middle East for decades to come, including elevating Nasser into a Pan-Arab nationalist hero and inciting a wave of radical anti-Western nationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nixon Character Author(S): Jonathan Aitken Reviewed Work(S): Source: Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol
    The Nixon Character Author(s): Jonathan Aitken Reviewed work(s): Source: Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 1, The Nixon Presidency (Winter, 1996), pp. 239-247 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27551562 . Accessed: 05/07/2012 11:37 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Blackwell Publishing and Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Presidential Studies Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org The Nixon Character THE RT. HON. JONATHAN AITKEN, M.P. Nixon Biographer are never Whatever the bad things thatNixon has done in his life, forget that he took in is is so in man. the great moral teachings. That why there much good that see Sometimes the good side of him has been subsumed by political ambition. I could to two that might be going happen but also I have always known that he is guys in one and that the decentQuaker moral side has been there all the time, sometimes creating great tensions1 This perceptive comment on the character of America's thirty-seventh president came from Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Own Personal Judas: the Rehabilitation of Jeffrey Archer." Harnessing Chaos: the Bible in English Political Discourse Since 1968
    Crossley, James G. "Your Own Personal Judas: The Rehabilitation of Jeffrey Archer." Harnessing Chaos: The Bible in English Political Discourse Since 1968. London: Bloomsbury T & T Clark, 2014. 183–209. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 23 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9780567659347.ch-007>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 23 September 2021, 18:37 UTC. Copyright © James G. Crossley 2014. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. Chapter 7 YOUR OWN PERSONAL JUDAS: THE REHABILITATION OF JEFFREY ARCHER 1. Thou Shalt Not Get Caught Despite Thatcherism-without-Thatcher becoming the political norm by the mid-1990s, this period would simultaneously mark a decline of the Conservative Party in British politics, and in no small part due to the ‘toxic’ image that Thatcher had come to represent. Thatcher was brought down in 1990 by a combination of her confrontational style of running cabinet, Michael Heseltine’s leadership ambitions, the long-serving Geoffrey Howe’s devastating resignation speech, and the deeply unpopu- lar Poll Tax. Her apparently consensual replacement, John Major, had surprisingly managed to win the 1992 General Election outright, but it would be downhill for the Tories from then on. The issue of Europe and the EU was ripping the party apart while, among other things, the BSE crisis, recession, and political ‘sleaze’ all but made a crushing defeat in the 1997 election inevitable and one from which they have only just (about) recovered.
    [Show full text]