The Consummate Etcher and Other 17Th Century Printmakers SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Petite Commande of 1664: Burlesque in the Gardens of Versailles Thomasf
The Petite Commande of 1664: Burlesque in the Gardens of Versailles ThomasF. Hedin It was Pierre Francastel who christened the most famous the west (Figs. 1, 2, both showing the expanded zone four program of sculpture in the history of Versailles: the Grande years later). We know the northern end of the axis as the Commande of 1674.1 The program consisted of twenty-four Allee d'Eau. The upper half of the zone, which is divided into statues and was planned for the Parterre d'Eau, a square two identical halves, is known to us today as the Parterre du puzzle of basins that lay on the terrace in front of the main Nord (Fig. 2). The axis terminates in a round pool, known in western facade for about ten years. The puzzle itself was the sources as "le rondeau" and sometimes "le grand ron- designed by Andre Le N6tre or Charles Le Brun, or by the deau."2 The wall in back of it takes a series of ninety-degree two artists working together, but the two dozen statues were turns as it travels along, leaving two niches in the middle and designed by Le Brun alone. They break down into six quar- another to either side (Fig. 1). The woods on the pool's tets: the Elements, the Seasons, the Parts of the Day, the Parts of southern side have four right-angled niches of their own, the World, the Temperamentsof Man, and the Poems. The balancing those in the wall. On July 17, 1664, during the Grande Commande of 1674 was not the first program of construction of the wall, Le Notre informed the king by statues in the gardens of Versailles, although it certainly was memo that he was erecting an iron gate, some seventy feet the largest and most elaborate from an iconographic point of long, in the middle of it.3 Along with his text he sent a view. -
Evolution and Ambition in the Career of Jan Lievens (1607-1674)
ABSTRACT Title: EVOLUTION AND AMBITION IN THE CAREER OF JAN LIEVENS (1607-1674) Lloyd DeWitt, Ph.D., 2006 Directed By: Prof. Arthur K. Wheelock, Jr. Department of Art History and Archaeology The Dutch artist Jan Lievens (1607-1674) was viewed by his contemporaries as one of the most important artists of his age. Ambitious and self-confident, Lievens assimilated leading trends from Haarlem, Utrecht and Antwerp into a bold and monumental style that he refined during the late 1620s through close artistic interaction with Rembrandt van Rijn in Leiden, climaxing in a competition for a court commission. Lievens’s early Job on the Dung Heap and Raising of Lazarus demonstrate his careful adaptation of style and iconography to both theological and political conditions of his time. This much-discussed phase of Lievens’s life came to an end in 1631when Rembrandt left Leiden. Around 1631-1632 Lievens was transformed by his encounter with Anthony van Dyck, and his ambition to be a court artist led him to follow Van Dyck to London in the spring of 1632. His output of independent works in London was modest and entirely connected to Van Dyck and the English court, thus Lievens almost certainly worked in Van Dyck’s studio. In 1635, Lievens moved to Antwerp and returned to history painting, executing commissions for the Jesuits, and he also broadened his artistic vocabulary by mastering woodcut prints and landscape paintings. After a short and successful stay in Leiden in 1639, Lievens moved to Amsterdam permanently in 1644, and from 1648 until the end of his career was engaged in a string of important and prestigious civic and princely commissions in which he continued to demonstrate his aptitude for adapting to and assimilating the most current style of his day to his own somber monumentality. -
November 2012 Newsletter
historians of netherlandish art NEWSLETTER AND REVIEW OF BOOKS Dedicated to the Study of Netherlandish, German and Franco-Flemish Art and Architecture, 1350-1750 Vol. 29, No. 2 November 2012 Jan and/or Hubert van Eyck, The Three Marys at the Tomb, c. 1425-1435. Oil on panel. Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam. In the exhibition “De weg naar Van Eyck,” Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, October 13, 2012 – February 10, 2013. HNA Newsletter, Vol. 23, No. 2, November 2006 1 historians of netherlandish art 23 S. Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904 Telephone: (732) 937-8394 E-Mail: [email protected] www.hnanews.org Historians of Netherlandish Art Offi cers President - Stephanie Dickey (2009–2013) Bader Chair in Northern Baroque Art Queen’s University Kingston ON K7L 3N6 Canada Vice-President - Amy Golahny (2009–2013) Lycoming College Williamsport, PA 17701 Treasurer - Rebecca Brienen University of Miami Art & Art History Department PO Box 248106 Coral Gables FL 33124-2618 European Treasurer and Liaison - Fiona Healy Seminarstrasse 7 D-55127 Mainz Germany Contents Board Members President's Message .............................................................. 1 Paul Crenshaw (2012-2016) HNA News ............................................................................1 Wayne Franits (2009-2013) Personalia ............................................................................... 2 Martha Hollander (2012-2016) Exhibitions ............................................................................ 3 Henry Luttikhuizen (2009 and 2010-2014) -
The Drawings of Cornelis Visscher (1628/9-1658) John Charleton
The Drawings of Cornelis Visscher (1628/9-1658) John Charleton Hawley III Jamaica Plain, MA M.A., History of Art, Institute of Fine Arts – New York University, 2010 B.A., Art History and History, College of William and Mary, 2008 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Art and Architectural History University of Virginia May, 2015 _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements.......................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: The Life of Cornelis Visscher .......................................................................................... 3 Early Life and Family .................................................................................................................... 4 Artistic Training and Guild Membership ...................................................................................... 9 Move to Amsterdam ................................................................................................................. -
Following the Early Modern Engraver, 1480-1650 September 18, 2009-January 3, 2010
The Brilliant Line: Following the Early Modern Engraver, 1480-1650 September 18, 2009-January 3, 2010 When the first engravings appeared in southern Germany around 1430, the incision of metal was still the domain of goldsmiths and other metalworkers who used burins and punches to incise armor, liturgical objects, and jewelry with designs. As paper became widely available in Europe, some of these craftsmen recorded their designs by printing them with ink onto paper. Thus the art of engraving was born. An engraver drives a burin, a metal tool with a lozenge-shaped tip, into a prepared copperplate, creating recessed grooves that will capture ink. After the plate is inked and its flat surfaces wiped clean, the copperplate is forced through a press against dampened paper. The ink, pulled from inside the lines, transfers onto the paper, printing the incised image in reverse. Engraving has a wholly linear visual language. Its lines are distinguished by their precision, clarity, and completeness, qualities which, when printed, result in vigorous and distinctly brilliant patterns of marks. Because lines once incised are very difficult to remove, engraving promotes both a systematic approach to the copperplate and the repetition of proven formulas for creating tone, volume, texture, and light. The history of the medium is therefore defined by the rapid development of a shared technical knowledge passed among artists dispersed across Renaissance and Baroque (Early Modern) Europe—from the Rhine region of Germany to Florence, Nuremberg, Venice, Rome, Antwerp, and Paris. While engravers relied on systems of line passed down through generations, their craft was not mechanical. -
Open Access Version Via Utrecht University Repository
Philosopher on the throne Stanisław August’s predilection for Netherlandish art in the context of his self-fashioning as an Enlightened monarch Magdalena Grądzka Philosopher on the throne Magdalena Grądzka Philosopher on the throne Stanisław August’s predilection for Netherlandish art in the context of his self-fashioning as an Enlightened monarch Magdalena Grądzka 3930424 March 2018 Master Thesis Art History of the Low Countries in its European Context University of Utrecht Prof. dr. M.A. Weststeijn Prof. dr. E. Manikowska 1 Philosopher on the throne Magdalena Grądzka Index Introduction p. 4 Historiography and research motivation p. 4 Theoretical framework p. 12 Research question p. 15 Chapters summary and methodology p. 15 1. The collection of Stanisław August 1.1. Introduction p. 18 1.1.1. Catalogues p. 19 1.1.2. Residences p. 22 1.2. Netherlandish painting in the collection in general p. 26 1.2.1. General remarks p. 26 1.2.2. Genres p. 28 1.2.3. Netherlandish painting in the collection per stylistic schools p. 30 1.2.3.1. The circle of Rubens and Van Dyck p. 30 1.2.3.2. The circle of Rembrandt p. 33 1.2.3.3. Italianate landscapists p. 41 1.2.3.4. Fijnschilders p. 44 1.2.3.5. Other Netherlandish artists p. 47 1.3. Other painting schools in the collection p. 52 1.3.1. Paintings by court painters in Warsaw p. 52 1.3.2. Italian paintings p. 53 1.3.3. French paintings p. 54 1.3.4. German paintings p. -
OBJECT LIST a Kingdom of Images: French Prints in the Age of Louis XIV, 1660–1715 June 16–September 6, 2015 at the Getty Research Institute GLORY of the KING
OBJECT LIST A Kingdom of Images: French Prints in the Age of Louis XIV, 1660–1715 June 16–September 6, 2015 at the Getty Research Institute GLORY OF THE KING Louis XIV, King of France and Navarre, 1676 Robert Nanteuil (French, 1623–1678) Engraving The Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles (2012.PR.70) Almanac for the Year 1666 (The Royal Manufactory, Established by the Order of His Majesty), 1665 Publishers: Pierre I Mariette (French, ca. 1603–1657) and Pierre Landry (French, ca. 1630–1701) Engraving and etching with letterpress calendar Lent by the Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des Estampes et de la Photographie Almanac for the Year 1682 (Le bal à la françoise), 1681 Unknown printmaker Publisher: Pierre Landry (French, ca. 1630–1701) Engraving and etching with letterpress calendar Lent by the Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des Estampes et de la Photographie Almanac for the Year 1674 (Long Live the King!), 1673 Pierre Lepautre (French, 1652–1716) and unknown printmaker Publisher: Pierre Landry (French, ca. 1630–1701) Engraving and etching with letterpress calendar Lent by the Bibliothèque nationale de France, Département des Estampes et de la Photographie Almanac for the Year 1686 (Louis le Grand: The Terror and Admiration of the Universe), 1685 Unknown printmaker Publisher: Nicolas I Langlois (French, 1640–1703) Engraving and etching with letterpress calendar Lent by a private collection Young Louis XIV Drawing a Portrait of His Father, Louis XIII, ca. 1643 Grégoire Huret (French, 1606–1670) Etching and engraving The Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles (2012.PR.81) The Chariot of Triumph, ca. -
COVER NOVEMBER Prova.Qxd
52-54 Lucy Art March-Aprilcorr1_*FACE MANOPPELLO DEF.qxd 2/28/21 12:12 PM Page 52 OIfN B TooHksE, AErYt EaSn dO PFe oTpHle E BEHOLDERS n BY LUCY GORDAN (“The NIl eMwo nWdoor lNd”o)v bo y Giandomenico Tiepolo, from the Prado, Madrid. Below , bTyh eR eGmirlb irna na dt, fFroramm te he Royal Castle Museum, Warsaw affeo Barberini (1568-1644) became Pope Urban the help of Borromini, Bernini took over. The exterior, in - VIII on August 6, 1623. During his reign he ex - spired by the Colosseum and similar in appearance to the Mpanded papal territory by force of arms and advan - Palazzo Farnese, which had been constructed between 1541 tageous politicking and reformed church missions. But he and c. 1580, was completed in 1633. is certainly best remembered as a prominent patron of the When Urban VIII died, his successor Pamphili Pope In - arts on a grand scale. nocent X (r. 1644-1655) confiscated the Palazzo Barberini, Barberini funded many sculptures from Bernini: the but returned it in 1653. From then on it continued to remain first in c. 1617 the “Boy with a Dragon” and later, when the property of the Barberini family until 1949 when it was Pope, several portrait busts, but also numerous architectural bought by the Italian Government to become the art museum works including the building of the College of Propaganda it is today. But there was a problem: in 1934 the Barberinis Fide, the Fountain of the Triton in today’s Piazza Barberini, had rented a section of the building to the Army for its Offi - and the and the in St. -
The Encounter of the Emblematic Tradition with Optics the Anamorphic Elephant of Simon Vouet
Nuncius 31 (2016) 288–331 brill.com/nun The Encounter of the Emblematic Tradition with Optics The Anamorphic Elephant of Simon Vouet Susana Gómez López* Faculty of Philosophy, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain [email protected] Abstract In his excellent work Anamorphoses ou perspectives curieuses (1955), Baltrusaitis con- cluded the chapter on catoptric anamorphosis with an allusion to the small engraving by Hans Tröschel (1585–1628) after Simon Vouet’s drawing Eight satyrs observing an ele- phantreflectedonacylinder, the first known representation of a cylindrical anamorpho- sis made in Europe. This paper explores the Baroque intellectual and artistic context in which Vouet made his drawing, attempting to answer two central sets of questions. Firstly, why did Vouet make this image? For what purpose did he ideate such a curi- ous image? Was it commissioned or did Vouet intend to offer it to someone? And if so, to whom? A reconstruction of this story leads me to conclude that the cylindrical anamorphosis was conceived as an emblem for Prince Maurice of Savoy. Secondly, how did what was originally the project for a sophisticated emblem give rise in Paris, after the return of Vouet from Italy in 1627, to the geometrical study of catoptrical anamor- phosis? Through the study of this case, I hope to show that in early modern science the emblematic tradition was not only linked to natural history, but that insofar as it was a central feature of Baroque culture, it seeped into other branches of scientific inquiry, in this case the development of catoptrical anamorphosis. Vouet’s image is also a good example of how the visual and artistic poetics of the baroque were closely linked – to the point of being inseparable – with the scientific developments of the period. -
Simon Vouet, Paris, Grand Palais, L’Artiste; Inv
Neil Jeffares, Dictionary of pastellists before 1800 Online edition VOUET, Simon Paris 9.I.1590–30.VI.1649 One of the major French painters of the early seventeenth century, between 1614 and 1627 Vouet was in Rome, where he became president of the Accademia di San Luca in 1624 and married Virginia da Vezzo (q.v.) two years later. On his return to Paris he was made premier peintre du roi. He left a collection of portraits made for Louis XIII (q.v.), whom Vouet also taught, in a medium widely described as pastel: the artist’s posthumous inventory recorded (item 293) “ung livre relié en veau doré et semé de fleurs de lis tout autour, chargé des armes du Roy de Fancs, dans lequel il y a soixante-quatre feuilles tand de J.777.065 Le président de BURY, cr. clr (PC 1987). portraits au pastel que autres choses dudit J.777.1013 [Charles de La Porte, marquis] de LA Lit.: Brejon de Lavergnée 1987, p. 75 n.r. MEILLERAYE [(1602–1664)], cr. clr (PC 1987). deffunt Vouet”, while another 15 heads were J.777.075 DAUPRE, sergent de la Bastille, cr. clr, also bound in a second book (item 294): “un Lit.: Brejon de Lavergnée 1987, p. 75 n.r. pstl, 28.5x20.5 (PC 1982). Lit.: Brejon de J.777.1015 LOUIS XIII (1601–1643), cr. clr, autre petit livre dans lequel y a quinze testes de Lavergnée 1982, fig. 37 ϕ portrais designes par led. Deffunt.” pstl/br. ppr, 27.3x21.1, c.1633 (New York, Some thirty examples surviving from a MMA, inv. -
3. Vermeylen.Indd 138 12/12/2012 11:42:00 AM Rubens and Goltzius in Dialogue 139
De Zeventiende Eeuw 28 (2012) 2, pp. 138-160 - eISSN: 2212-7402 - Print ISSN: 0921-142x Rubens and Goltzius in dialogue Artistic exchanges between Antwerp and Haarlem during the Revolt Filip Vermeylen and Karolien De Clippel Filip Vermeylen (Ph.D. Columbia University 2002) is an Associate Professor at the Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication at the Erasmus University in Rotterdam. He lectures and publishes on various aspects of the economics of art and culture, past and present, and with a particular focus on art markets. Since 2009, he is the director of an nwo-research project entit- led ‘Artistic exchanges and cultural transmission in the Low Countries, 1572-1672: mobility of artists, works of art and artistic knowledge’. His book Painting for the market. Commercialization of art in Antwerp’s Golden Age won the Robert Bainton Prize for Art History in 2006. [email protected] Karolien De Clippel (Ph.D. ku Leuven 2002) is an Associate Professor at the Department of History and Art History of Utrecht University. She specializes in Early Modern painting of the Low Countries, with a particular focus on genre and classical mythology and with a special incli- nation for individual artists such as Peter Paul Rubens and Adriaen Brouwer. Since 2009, she is the co-director of an nwo-research project entitled ‘Artistic exchanges and cultural transmission in the Low Countries, 1572-1672: mobility of artists, works of art and artistic knowledge’. [email protected] Abstract The Haarlem school of painting is considered to be an archetype of the Dutch Golden Age, whereby a quintessential Dutchness is said to emanate from its famous landscape and genre paintings. -
Handbook of the Collections
Bowdoin College Bowdoin Digital Commons Museum of Art Collection Catalogues Museum of Art 1981 Handbook of the Collections Bowdoin College. Museum of Art Margaret Burke Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/art-museum-collection- catalogs Part of the Fine Arts Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bowdoin College. Museum of Art and Burke, Margaret, "Handbook of the Collections" (1981). Museum of Art Collection Catalogues. 5. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/art-museum-collection-catalogs/5 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum of Art at Bowdoin Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Museum of Art Collection Catalogues by an authorized administrator of Bowdoin Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bowdoin College Museum of Art HANDBOOK of the Collections The Bowdoin College Library Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/handbookofcollecOObowd Handbook of the Collections Walter Art Building McKim, Mead & White, architects i8g2-i8g4 Bowdoin College Museum of Art HANDBOOK COLLECTIONS Edited by MARGARET R. BURKE BRUNSWICK, MAINE 1981 COVER DRAWING BASED ON ORNAMENTAL DETAILS OF THE WALKER ART BUILDING BY JOSEPH NICOLETTI TYPE COMPOSITION BY THE ANTHOENSEN PRESS OFFSET PRINTING BY THE MERIDEN GRAVURE COMPANY DESIGN BY JOHN McKEE This project is supported by a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts in Washington, D.C., a federal agency. ISBN: 0-916606-01-5 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 81—66892 Copyright 1981 by the President and Trustees of Bowdoin College All rights reserved the memory ofJohn H.