DOCSLIB.ORG

In the Halesian Summa: a Lonergan Reading

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In the Halesian Summa: a Lonergan Reading THE RELATION BETWEEN UNCREATED AND CREATED GRACE IN THE HALESIAN SUMMA: A LONERGAN READING by H. Daniel Monsour A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Theology of the University of St. Michael's College and the Department of Theology of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology awarded by the University of St. Michael's College Toronto, 2000 O H. Daniel Monsour National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1+1 dcanacia du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services sewices bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rwWdlington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 OnawaON K1AW Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence aiiowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sel1 reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othenvise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. The Relation between Uncreated and Created Grace in the Halesian Summa: A Lonergan Reading by H. Daniel Monsour Doctor of Philosophy in Theology, Faculty of Theology, University of St Michael's College (2000) The terms, gratia increata and gratia creata, emerged in theological reflection in the West in the early thirteenth century as the expression of an understanding that for the first tirne attempted to relate systematically the indwelling of the Divine Persons in human hearts and the new Iife in God that characterizes those who embrace God's saving action in their lives. This dissertation atternpts to outline the movement in theological reflection that led to the introduction of the tenns, to clarify how the relation between the realities to which the ternis are meant to refer was initially understood, and to indicate briefly what in that initial understanding is of permanent theological validity. Initially, the dissertation focuses on methodological considerations. Drawing on Bernard Lonergan's exposition of transcendental method and the concrete generality of its heuristic function, I attempt to specify a set of ideal-types that will be employed in the subsequent historical discussion. Thus, I treat briefly the elements and functions of meaning and the pivotal role these play in constituting the history that is written about, the various differentiations of consciousness and the various correlative Realms and Worlds of meaning, the genetic sequence in which at least some of the differentiations of consciousness are realized in a culture and the consequent stages of meaning of a culture, symbolic apprehension, and continuing contexts and the various kinds of relationship that can exist between continuing contexts. The discussion then turns to an examination of the first extended treatment of the terrns gratia increata and gratia creata in theological literature, found in a set of questions ir: the Summa attributed to Alexander of Hales. The goal here is to provide a prelirninary clarification of the rneaning of the tems that can serve as an anchor and preparation for the subsequent discussion. Little explicit reference is made in this preliminary clarification to the philosophical and theological contexts out of which the terms emerged. An explicit consideration of context, however, does follow in the next two chapten. I distinguish a general philosophical context and a more specific theological context for the emergence of the tenns. The general philosophical context concerns the systematic substructure that facilitated the compounding of the manner in which theological reflection was conducted and the establishment of a new systematic ideal in theological refiection. This compounding of the manner of theological reflection was precipitated in large part by the writings of Aristotle that had become newly available in the West during the twelfth and early thirteenth centuries. Next, in the specifically theological context I distinguish and trace two movements in theological reflection. The first concems developments in the theology of grace and the pivotal role Philip the Chancellor played in that development, in particular his articulation of what Lonergan cal1 the theorem of the supernatural and his forging of the notion of the supernatural entitative habitus. The second concerns the doctrine of divine inhabitation as it developed in the West from its affirmation in the New Testament, through Augustine, and up to its articulation in Peter Lombard. With the prelirninary clarification of the meaning of the tems gratia increata and gratia creata now enhanced and consolidated by an examination of the contexts out of which the tens emerged, the discussion turns in Chapter 5 to a more intensive examination of the relationships between the realities referred to by the terms. In an extended exploration of the issues, I argue that al1 the elements in the Halesian Summa's position can be brought together wherently if one understands it as moving toward the affirmation that the bestowal of gratia gratum faciens is the necessary and sufficient proportionate preparation for human beings to enter into the special presence of the already wholly present three-personed God, and indeed for a presential union with the th ree-personed God , because from gratia gratum faciens originates the operative habitus and operations of charity, the supernatural. reposeful love of God, the complacentia in the summa Bonitas, which as love involves intrinsically the presence of the beloved within the lover, and therefore enables the lover to attajn the three-personed God in direct proportion to the depth of his or her love. Finally, drawing on Lonergan's discussion of the ways of considering truths concerning God. I attempt bnefly to indicate some structural elements in the theological position of the Halesian Summa on this issue that may be of permanent theological validity. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would fike to offer my sincere thanks to Professor Robert M. Doran, rny director, and to Professor Michael Vertin, both of whorn excel in guidance that is gentle and wise, and in encouragement that is constant. I would also Iike to express my gratitude to al1 those connected with the John Charles Beer Travelling Fellowship for Lonergan Studies for financial support during the course of my studies. iii To the memorv of my brother Maurice John(~ofe) Monmur, who died during the early davs of writing the dissertation TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Methodological Considerations 1 Transcendental Method 2 The Heuristic Function of Transcendental Method 3 Heuristic Structures and Historical Studies of Doctrinal Development in Theology 3.1 History end the Eletnents and Functions of Meaning 3.2 Differentiations of Consciousness 3.3 Stages of Meaning of a Culture 3.4 Symbolic Apprehensjon 3. 5 Confinuing Contexts 4 Résumé 2 Gratia lncreata et Creata in the Halesian Sumrna 1 Origin of the Ternis Grafia lncreata and Grafia Cmafa 2 Quid sit gratia secundum nominis rationem 3 Quid sit gratia secundum definitionem 4 Utrum gratia ponat aliquid secundum rem in gratificato 5 Utrum gratia sit res creafa vel increata 6 Gratia creata et increata and the grace of union 3 The General Philosophical Context: Emergence of the Systematic ldeal in Theology 1 Theological Reflection and Dialectic in the Twelfth Century 2 Opposition from the Clausfrales 3 The "Entries" of Aristotle and the Systematic ldeal 4 The More Specific Theological Context for the Ernergence of the Notions of Gratia lncreata et Creata 1 The Emergence of the Notion of the Supernatural Habifus 1. 1 The Psychological lnfetpretation of Grace 1. 2 Diniculties wifh the Psychological lnferpretation of Grace 1. 3 Moving Towards a Solufion 1.4 Breakthmugh: The Theorem of the Supernafural 1.5 Philip the Chancellor and the Notion of fhe Supernatuml Habifus 2 The Special Presence of the Holy Spirit 2.1 The Wifness of the New Testament 2. 2 Augustine's Confribution 2. 2. 1 The Letter to Dardanus 2.2.2 De Tnnifate 2. 3 Peter Lombard's Sententiae 5 The Halesian Summa 1 A Preliminary Clarification of the Issue 2 A Triangle of Relotionships 2.1 The Relationship between Gratia Gmtum Fsciens and the Speciel Presence of the Holy Spirit: The Precise Question 2.2 The Relationship between Gratia Gmtum Faciens and the Repraesentafio of the Procession of the Holy Spirit 2. 2. 1 Final Causality 2.2.2 God as Final Cause of Gratia Gratum Faciens 2.2.3 The lmage of Fnrctus 2.2.4 The lmage of Light and Rays of Light 2. 3 The Relationship between the Special Presence of the Holy Spirit and the Repmesenfatio of fhe Procession of the Holy Spirit 2. 3. 1 Cunningham's Criticism of the Halesian Position 2. 3.2 A Response to Cunningham's Criticism 2.3.3 Love and the Special Presence of the Holy Spirit Conclusion Bibliography vii For there that love is ledere, ne lakked neuere grace William Langland, Piers Piowman ...Face is tied rip with God's lovinggi!of himself to us.... Bernard Lonergan, Method in Theology The study of history has as its primary goal reasonably grounded affinnations of the perspectival reconstructions of intelligence concerning what was going fomvard in the field of human affairs, that is, in the field constituted by the meaningful speech and action of successive rnembers of the various kinds of human communities or groups. at particular tirnes and places. One can distinguish different kinds of historical studies. Thus, in Method in Theology Bernard Lonergan distinguishes basic historical studies, special histoncal studies and general historical studies.' As the name suggests, basic historical studies have a certain priority in relation to special and general historical studies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Institute for Method in Theology, Newsletter 1
    Newsletter 1 International Institute for Method in Theology September 2018 The International Institute for Method in Theology was launched at a colloquium held at Marquette University in March of 2017. The Institute is sponsored by the Marquette Lonergan Project, the Lonergan Research Institute of Regis College in the University of Toronto, and the Faculty of Theology at the Gregorian University, Rome. Representatives of all three institutions were present at the colloquium: Robert M. Doran, S.J., from Marquette, Eric Mabry, Interim Director of the Lonergan Research Institute, and Gerard Whelan, S.J., Professor of Theology at the Gregorian University. In the lecture that he presented at the colloquium, Robert Doran, Emmett Doerr Chair in Catholic Systematic Theology and Director of the Marquette Lonergan Project, narrated how the founding of the Institute is the long-term result of a suggestion that he had made to a Canadian Jesuit Provincial, Reverend William Addley, S.J., in 1984. Doran was living in Toronto at the time, teaching and writing at Regis College in the University of Toronto. The suggestion led to the establishment by Fr Addley of the Lonergan Research Institute. Recent research in the Frederick Crowe Archives at the LRI reveals how this new project of an Institute for Method in Theology was a part of the original vision of the LRI when it was founded. It was put on hold because the principal efforts of the LRI from its inception centered around the publication of Lonergan’s Collected Works with University of Toronto Press and the cataloguing and preservation of Lonergan’s archival papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Lonergan on the Cross As Communication
    Why the Passion? : Bernard Lonergan on the Cross as Communication Author: Mark T. Miller Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/2235 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2008 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Theology WHY THE PASSION?: BERNARD LONERGAN ON THE CROSS AS COMMUNICATION a dissertation by MARK T. MILLER submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosopy August 2008 © copyright by MARK THOMAS MILLER 2008 Abstract Why the Passion?: Bernard Lonergan, S.J. on the Cross as Communication by Mark T. Miller, directed by Frederick Lawrence This dissertation aims at understanding Bernard Lonergan’s understanding of how the passion of Jesus Christ is salvific. Because salvation is of human persons in a community, a history, and a cosmos, the first part of the dissertation examines Lonergan’s cosmology with an emphasis on his anthropology. For Lonergan the cosmos is a dynamic, interrelated hierarchy governed by the processes of what he calls “emergent probability.” Within the universe of emergent probability, humanity is given the ability to direct world processes with critical intelligence, freedom, love, and cooperation with each other and with the larger world order. This ability is not totally undirected. Rather, it has a natural orientation, a desire or eros for ultimate goodness, truth, beauty, and love, i.e. for God. When made effective through an authentic, recurrent cycle of experience, questioning, understanding, judgment, decision, action, and cooperation, this human desire for God results in progress.
    [Show full text]
  • University at Buffalo Department of Philosophy Nousletter Interview with Jorge Gracia
    University at Buffalo Department of Philosophy Nousletter Interview with Jorge Gracia Jorge Gracia is a polymath. He works in metaphysics/ontology, philosophical historiography, philosophy of language/hermeneutics, ethnicity/race/nationality issues, Hispanic/Latino issues, medieval/scholastic philosophy, Cuban and Argentinian art, and Borges. Gracia’s earliest work was in medieval philosophy. His more than three decades of contributions to medieval philosophy were recently recognized by his being named the winner of the most prestigious award in the field in 2011, the American Catholic Philosophical Association’s Aquinas Medal. That put him in the ranks of Jacques Maritain, Etienne Gilson, Bernard Lonergan, Joseph Owens, G. E. M. Anscombe, Peter Geach, Michael Dummett, John Finnis, Brian Davies, Anthony Kenny, Alisdair McIntyre and one Pope, Karol Wojtyla, and now one saint. Even after Gracia redirected some of his intellectual energies into other branches of philosophy, UB was still being ranked by the Philosophical Gourmet Report (PGR) as one of the best schools in medieval philosophy: 13th in 2006 and in the 15-20 range in 2008. If there were PGR rankings for Latin American philosophy or the philosophy of race and ethnicity, Jorge Gracia’s work would have enabled us to be highly ranked in those fields, higher, I suspect, than UB is in any other philosophical specialization. In the 2010 Blackwell Companion to Latin American Philosophy, Gracia was listed as one of the 40 most important figures in Latin American philosophy since the year 1500! Gracia is also one of the leaders in the emerging field of the philosophy of race and ethnicity.
    [Show full text]
  • New Directions for Catholic Theology. Bernard Lonergan's Move Beyond
    JHMTh/ZNThG; 2019 26(1): 108–131 Benjamin Dahlke New Directions for Catholic Theology. Bernard Lonergan’s Move beyond Neo-Scholasticism DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/znth-2019-0005 Abstract: Wie andere aufgeschlossene Fachvertreter seiner Generation hat der kanadische Jesuit Bernard Lonergan (1904–1984) dazu beigetragen, die katho- lische Theologie umfassend zu erneuern. Angesichts der oenkundigen Gren- zen der Neuscholastik, die sich im Laufe des 19. Jahrhunderts als das Modell durchgesetzt hatte, suchte er schon früh nach einer Alternative. Bei aller Skep- sis gegenüber dem herrschenden Thomismus schätzte er Thomas von Aquin in hohem Maß. Das betraf insbesondere dessen Bemühen, die damals aktuellen wissenschaftlichen und methodischen Erkenntnisse einzubeziehen. Lonergan wollte dies ebenso tun. Es ging ihm darum, der katholischen Theologie eine neue Richtung zu geben, also von der Neuscholastik abzurücken. Denn diese berücksichtigte weder das erkennende Subjekt noch das zu erkennende Objekt hinreichend. Keywords: Bernard Lonergan, Jesuits, Neo-Scholasticism, Vatican II, Thomism Bernard Lonergan (1904–1984), Canadian-born Jesuit, helped to foster the re- newal of theology as it took place in the wake of Vatican II, as well in the council’s aftermath. He was aware of the profound changes the discipline was going through. Since the customary way of presenting the Christian faith – usu- ally identified with Neo-Scholasticism – could no longer be considered adequate, Lonergan had been working out an alternative approach. It was his intent to provide theology with new foundations that led him to incorporate contem- porary methods of science and scholarship into theological practice. Faith, as he thought, should be made intelligible to the times.1 Thus, Lonergan moved beyond the borders set up by Neo-Scholasticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Lonergan Gatherings 7
    James Gerard Duffy Words, don't come easy to me How can I find a way to make you see I Love You Words don't come easy1 Introduction Recently I saw the movie “Suite Française” (2014), a drama set in in the early years of the German occupation of France which portrays a developing romance between a French villager awaiting news of her husband and a dapper, refined German soldier who composes music. In the initial half dozen or so scenes they cannot speak to one another, for he is a German officer with a responsibility to follow orders, while she lives under the thumb of her controlling mother-in-law who forbids her to interact with the enemy. But they have already met in a shared love of music and in a few wordless encounters. How, then, are they going to meet, protect, and greet each other? In this essay my aim is threefold. In the first section I briefly comment on my experience of meeting, protecting, and greeting undergraduates and graduate students in the last twenty years in the United States and Mexico. In particular I focus on two questions: “What do you want?” and “What do we want?” In the second section I suggest some ways to implement heuristics in order to ask these two questions patiently and humbly. In the third and final section I respond to McShane’s claim in Lonergan Gatherings 6 regarding ‘the unashamed shamefulness’ of leading figures in Lonergan studies. 1 “Words Don’t Come Easy,” F.R. David. 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Father Matthew L. Lamb
    Fr. Matthew L. Lamb’s C.V. December 2015 Father Matthew L. Lamb Priest of the Archdiocese of Milwaukee Professor of Theology Ave Maria University 5068 Annunciation Circle #203 Ave Maria, Florida 34142-9670 Tel. 239-216-1024 [email protected] [email protected] I. EDUCATION: 1974 Doktor der Theologie summa cum laude, Catholic Faculty of Theology, Westfälsche Wilhelms University, Münster, Germany. 1967-71 Doctoral studies, University of Tübingen (one semester) and Münster (six semesters). 1966 S.T.L. cum laude, the Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome, Italy. 1964-67 Graduate studies at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome. August 14, 1962 ordained to the Roman Catholic Priesthood, Trappist Monastery of the Holy Spirit, Conyers, Georgia; now a Roman Catholic priest incardinated in the Archdiocese of Milwaukee. 1960-64 Theological studies at the Trappist Monastic Scholasticate, Monastery of the Holy Spirit, Conyers, Georgia. 1957-60 Philosophical studies at the Trappist Monastic Scholasticate, Conyers, Georgia. II. TEACHING: A. Marquette University, College of Arts & Sciences 1973-74 Instructor in Systematic Theology B. Marquette University, Graduate School 1974-79 Assistant Professor of Fundamental Theology 1979-85 Associate Professor of Fundamental Theology C. University of Chicago, Divinity School & Graduate School 1980 Visiting Associate Professor in Philosophical Theology. Page 1 of 44 Fr. Matthew L. Lamb’s C.V. December 2015 D. Boston College, College of Arts and Sciences, Graduate School 1985-88 Associate Professor of Theology 1989 - 2004 Professor of Theology E. Ave Maria University, Department of Theology 2004 - 2014 Professor of Theology and Chairman 2015 - Professor of Theology III. GRANTS AND ACADEMIC HONORS: 2016 – Lifetime Achievement Award, American Maritain Association 2014 – Veritas Medal, Ave Maria University 2013 – Robert Bellarmine Award, Pontifical Gregorian University 2009 – Cardinal Maida Chair, Ave Maria University.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Nagel and Bernard Lonergan
    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Theses 2018 A dialogue of traditions on the reality of mind: Thomas Nagel and Bernard Lonergan Robert van Gend Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Publication Details van Gend, R. (2018). A dialogue of traditions on the reality of mind: Thomas Nagel and Bernard Lonergan (Master of Philosophy (School of Philosophy and Theology)). University of Notre Dame Australia. https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/theses/237 This dissertation/thesis is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A DIALOGUE OF TRADITIONS ON THE REALITY OF MIND: THOMAS NAGEL AND BERNARD LONERGAN Robert van Gend A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy School of Philosophy and Theology The University of Notre Dame Australia 2018 Abstract The scientific picture of the world is one of invisible particles and empty space, but this is not the world of our everyday experience. How can we reconcile the scientific view of the world with the view from our ordinary perspective? This thesis puts Thomas Nagel and Bernard Lonergan into dialogue on the question of the mind’s place in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Going Beyond Essentialism: Bernard J.F. Lonergan an Atypical Neo
    “The New Alliance: IISF ISTITUTO ITALIANO PER GLI STUDI FILOSOFICI the Role of the Italian Institute for Philosophical Studies” Ten years after the publication of La Nouvelle Alliance, I can say that a rapprochement between physical sciences and the humanities has been facilitated thanks also to the Italian Institute for Philosophical Studies. The Italian lnstitute for Philosophical Studies is an example of such rapprochement in the name of humanism. The Institute, in fact, studies the traditional problems of philosophy as well as the classical problems of science. In this sense, the Neapolitan Institute plays a very important role in Europe. Let me express a few words of admiration for Avv. Gerardo Marotta. I would like to say how impressed I am by the breadth of his work: seminars, publications, conferences, whose mere enumeration occupies volumes of thick books. It is also the variety of subjects that is so extraordinary: from history and philology to physics and mathematics. Thanks to your enthusiasm, and GOING BEYOND ESSENTIALISM: your generosity, dear Avv. Marotta, the Institute has set an example of what humanism BERNARD J.F. LONERGAN can be today. Your Institute does no longer belong to Italy alone. It is also an intellectual treasure of Europe as a whole. AN ATYPICAL NEO-SCHOLASTIC In the current process of rapprochement of natural sciences and the humanities, I believe Europe has a very special role to play. When I travel the world, whether to the edited by United States or to Japan, I see much interest in science, although in science too often CLOE TADDEI-FERRETTI viewed as a technological, economic, or even military instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Experience According to Bernard Lonergan
    Síntese - Rev. de Filosofia V . 38 N . 122 (2011): 381-398 RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE ACCORDING TO BERNARD LONERGAN (A experiência religiosa segundo Bernard Lonergan) Louis Roy * Abstract: This article purports to introduce readers to Bernard Lonergan’s understanding of religious experience. It contrasts the emphasis placed on doctrine by ancient Christian doctors during premodern times, with a typically modern way of putting a stress on religious experience. It describes Lonergan’s view of human intentionality. It explainlains what he calls ‘realms of meaningmeaning.’ It explicalicates the interrelations between the several components of religious experience. Lastly it characterizes Lonergan’s project as an integration of faith and reason. Keywords: Lonergan, Schleiermacher, religious experience, intentionality, meaning, faith and reason. Resumo: Este artigo pretende introduzir os leitores na compreensão da experiên- cia religiosa proposta por Bernard Lonergan. O texto contrapõe a ênfase posta na doutrina pelos antigos doutores cristãos ao longo da época pré-moderna com a maneira tipicamente moderna de acentuar a experiência religiosa, abordando os seguintes tópicos: (1) a concepção de Lonergan da intencionalidade humana; (2) * Louis Roy, O.P., holds a Ph.D. from the University of Cambridge. After teaching philosophy and theology for twenty years at the Jesuit University of Boston College, he is now Professor of theology at the Dominican University College in Ottawa. He is the editor of the French translation of Lonergan’s Method in Theology , entitled Pour une méthode en théologie (Montreal: Fides, and Paris: Cerf, 1978). Síntese, Belo Horizonte, v. 38, n. 122, 2011 381 sintese 122 - Ok.pmd 381 2/1/2012, 09:30 a noção do que ele chama de “reinos de significado”; (3) as interrelações entre os diversos componentes da experiência religiosa; (4) finalmente, a caracteriza- ção do projeto de Lonergan de uma integração de fé e razão.
    [Show full text]
  • Heythrop, Copleston, and the Jesuit Contribution to Philosophy 1
    1 Heythrop, Copleston, and the Jesuit Contribution to Philosophy 1 JOHN HALDANE Abstract There has been public outcry from philosophers and others at the prospect of the closure of Heythrop College, University of London; yet the nature and history of Heythrop remain little known. It is apt and timely, therefore, as its likely dissolution approaches, to provide a brief account of its origins and development up to and including the period of its entry into London University under the leadership of the most famous modern historian of philosophy Frederick Copleston. Following on from this the idea of a distinctive Jesuit intellectual tradition, and more specifically of the Jesuit contribution to philosophy is explored. If we once make the transition to metaphysical reflection (and nobody can compel us to do this), the immanent direction of the mind or reason to the One asserts itself. … Transcendence, in the active sense of transcending, belongs to man as much as does being in the world. And in my opinion metaphysics can be looked on as man’s appropriation in reflection of his own orientation to the transcendent Absolute. Frederick Copleston ‘Man, Transcendence and the Absence of God’ 2 1 The present essay derives from a lecture given at Senate House London as part of the celebration of Heythrop’s quartocentenary. I am grateful to the then Principal, Michael Holman S.J. for the invitation to contribute to that occasion. I received useful suggestions and comments from Kevin Flannery S.J., Joseph Godfrey S.J. and Patrick Riordan S.J. 2 See Copleston, Philosophers and Philosophies (London: Search Press, 1976) 62.
    [Show full text]
  • LONERGAN STUDIES NEWSLETTER Newsletter 42/2 May 2021
    LONERGAN STUDIES NEWSLETTER Newsletter 42/2 May 2021 Publications McNelis, Sean. “The Eight Enduring Challenges in Housing Studies - on Explanations, an Integrated Comprehensive Heuristic and Implementation: Some Comments on Mark Stephen’s article'.” Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 37, no. 5 (2020): 578-583, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2020.1816571. This article draws on Lonergan’s functional specialties, conceived as eight enduring challenges, to comment on a feature article in Housing, Theory and Society by a UK housing researcher, Mark Stephens, “How housing systems are changing and why: a critique of Kemeny’s theory of housing regimes.” The comment distinguishes three types of linked explanations – an explanatory definition of a housing system; an historical explanation of how a housing system develops; and a critical explanation that critiques the use and abuse of power. It argues that these distinctions are necessary if we are develop an adequate understanding of how housing systems work. The comment then expands on first type of explanation as one which seeks to develop an integrated comprehensive heuristic and notes that the theory of housing-welfare regimes focuses on one particular technological aspect (tenure) of the housing system. Finally, in response to Mark Stephen’s note that “one of the most enduring challenges in housing studies” is to understand “how housing systems function and change”, the comment concludes by summarily expanding this single challenge into eight enduring challenges in housing studies by distinguishing different stages in both research and implementation. Morelli, Mark D. Hegel Inside Out: Essays on Lonergan’s Debt to Hegel. Sherman Oaks, CA: Encanto Editions, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • William P. Loewe Contact School of Theology and Religious Studies
    William P. Loewe Contact School of Theology and Religious Studies Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064 [email protected] Education 1974 Ph.D., Religious Studies, Marquette University 1967 M.A., French, Fordham University 1966 Ph.L., Loyola Seminary 1965 B.A., Classics/French/Philosophy, Fordham University Employment 2017 - Ordinary Professor of Historical and Systematic Theology, Catholic University of America 1980 - 2017 Associate Professor of Historical and Systematic Theology, Catholic University of America 1974 – 1980 Assistant Professor of Religion and Religious Education, Catholic University of America 1973 – 1974 Lecturer, Catholic University of America 1967– 1968 Instructor, The Henle School, Queens, NY 1966 - 1967 Instructor, St. Peter’s Prep, Jersey City, N.J. Publications Books 2016 Lex Crucis: Soteriology and the Stages of Meaning. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. 2002 Theology and Sacred Scripture. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis. Coeditor with C. Dempsey. 2000 Introduçoã à Cristologia. Sao Paulo: Paulus. Translation of The College Student’s Introduction to Christology. 1998 Jesus Crucified and Risen: Essays in Honor of Dom Sebastian Moore. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press. Coeditor with Vernon Gregson. 1996 The College Student’s Introduction to Christology. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press. Articles 2018 “Sebastian Moore, Redemptive Transformation, and the Law of the Cross.” Downside Review 136/3, 178-185. 2014 “Jesus the Christ in Retrospect and Prospect.” In K. Coberg and R. Krieg, eds. Speaking the Truth in Love: The Theology of Cardinal Walter Kasper. Collegeville, Minn.: Liturgical Press, 79-97. 2011 “Continuing Conversations.” In C. Denny and C. McMahon, eds. Finding Salvation in Christ: Essays in Honor of William P. Loewe. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.
    [Show full text]